Sanjha Morcha

Final OROP instalment to be paid from August: Jaitley

Pension Grievances Cell have been receiving some grievances of the pensioners/family pensioners regarding non-payment of OROP benefits

GN Photo

The fourth and final instalment of One Rank One Pension (OROP) is due for payment from August, union defence minister Arun Jaitley said.
The government had issued orders for implementation of One Rank One Pension (OROP) on November 7, 2015. As on April 30, 2017, a sum of Rs 8,792.01 crore has been released to 21,08,398 defence forces pensioners / family pensioners in three instalments. Fourth and “final instalment is due for payment from August, 2017”, the Lok Sabha was informed.
Some ex-servicemen associations have been demanding changes in methodology for fixation of pension, periodicity of its revision, coverage of future Pre-mature retirees (PMR) cases etc. The government appointed One Member Judicial Committee (OMJC) on OROP to look into anomalies, if any arising out of implementation of OROP on December 14, 2015.
The committee submitted its report on October 26, 2016. An internal committee has been constituted by the government on July 19, 2017 to examine the recommendations of OMJC with respect to feasibility and financial aspects.
Pension Grievances Cell in the department have been receiving some grievances of the pensioners / family pensioners regarding non-payment of OROP benefits and taking up the matter with the  concerned offices e.g. Controller General of defence Accounts (CGDA), Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) and Pension Disbursing Agencies (Banks) for redressal of their grievances in a time-bound manner.

VETERANS DEMAND MAJ GEN SATBIR TO VACATE JANTAR MANTAR ::LETTING DOWN ESM COMMUNITY

BRIG R VINAYAK WRITES IN WHATS APP MESSAGE TO VETERANS
It is a pity Veterans are obsessed with Maj Gen Satbir about JM. Yes he did lead the vocal charge from JM and war cries of Veterans blared at South Block to force Government to announce formally the grant of OROP to us (with certain shortcomings) in Sep ’15 Government also kept a window open for ESM to address their genuine grievances on the anomalies in OROP announced by constituting the OMJC. That was the time to make an honourable exit from JM maintaining cordiality with the Government. Instead Maj Gen Satbir chose get exploited by political opponents of the ruling dispensation beginning with press conference with Ram Jethmalani followed by plunge into political slush in Bihar election, giving stage to Arvind Khejriwal at JM, Punjab election and so on. 
Obviously the Government reacted by ignoring Maj Gen Satbir and excluded him in all discussions chaired by RM. 
Untitled
At the end as expected Maj Gen Satbir has been dumped by even Capt Amrender Singh of Congress. 
So what has been achieved by continuance at JM – “धोबी का कुत्ता,न घर का न घाट का”. 
Maj Gen Satbir has let down the ESM fraternity by losing face. A voice going into deaf ears is of no use. 
Those who chant for JM continuance remind me of the Aazadi Brigade. 
At least I am convinced that Maj Gen Satbir who I had great respect for has been a great let down. 
Looking at the desperate and dirty fight for IESM Election to be conducted under Court orders is unfortunate.
MAJ GEN SPS GREWAL RESPONSE TO ABOVE MESSAGE
Capt Amarinder Singh didn’t exploit Maj Gen Satbir who begged everyone around to arrange his meetings with him.
 He didn’t dump him.
The points he discussed with  CM were already part of manifesto  and the same are in various stages of implementation.
 So there is no need to unnecessary build larger than life image.
 JM must be vacated immediately if we want our ESM not to suffer any further.
 I as member of IESM want more rational leader to lead us.    Ugrewal
  *Maj Gen SPS Grewal*
Ex-SERVICEMEN WELFARE POINTS INCLUDED IN ELECTION MANIFESTO OF PUNJAB CONGRESS IN MONTH OF DEC2016 ITSELF
  There were 24 Points which were discussed in detail at Congress Bhawan in Chandiagrh .The Hard Copy of Points about ESM welfare was handed over to S.Manpreet Badal in month of Oct 2016 by Col CJS Khera ,Gen Sect Sanjha Morcha.
The discussion took place with Manpreet Badal and the following were present
1. Lt Gen TS Shergill
2. Lt Gen JS Dhaliwal
3. Brig JS Jaswal
4. Brig Inder Mohan
5. Col Bhag Singh
6. Col Rs Boparai
7. Col CJS Khera
Congress-Manifesto_Page_001
Congress-Manifesto_Page_110 Congress-Manifesto_Page_111 Congress-Manifesto_Page_112 Congress-Manifesto_Page_113 Congress-Manifesto_Page_001

‘Incident’ took place between Indian, Chinese troops in Ladakh: Govt

'Incident' took place between Indian, Chinese troops in Ladakh: Govt
A file photo of the Pangong Tso (lake).

New Delhi, August 18

India on Friday said it will continue to engage with China to find a mutually acceptable solution to the Dokalam standoff, while confirming that “an incident” did take place between Chinese troops and Indian border guards in Ladakh on August 15.

“We will continue to engage with China to find a mutually acceptable solution,” MEA spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said replying to a volley of questions on the issue.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

He said peace and tranquility in the border areas is an important pre-requisite for smooth development of bilateral relationship.

Asked about the incident between Chinese troops and Indian border guards in Ladakh on August 15, the MEA spokesperson said, “Such incidents are not in the interest of either side.”

The incident occurred when land-based patrols of both sides came face to face north of the Pangong Tso (lake) in eastern Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir.

The MEA spokesperson said two border personnel meetings (BPMs) had taken place between Indian border guards and Chinese troops recently.

He said one BPM had taken place at Chushul on August 16 and another one at Nathu La a week before.

‘Haven’t received hydrological data from China’

Asked if China has shared hydrological data with India in the backdrop of floods in Assam, Kumar said there is an existing expert-level mechanism, established in 2006, and there are two MoUs under which China is expected to share hydrological data on the rivers Satluj and Brahmaputra with India during the flood season of May 15 to June 15.

“For this year, we have not received hydrological data from the Chinese side,” the spokesperson said.

However, he added that it was “premature” to link it with the floods in Assam.

He also noted that in view of floods in Bihar, India was closely coordinating with Nepal, both at the Centre and state levels.

Asked about the reported comments of the Japanese Ambassador on Dokalam faceoff and if India welcomes it, Kumar gave a very guarded reaction, saying the remarks speak for themselves.

The Japanese ambassador was quoted in media as saying that no country should use unilateral forces to alter the status of Dokalam.

“We recognise Dokalam is a disputed area between Bhutan and China and two countries are engaged in border talks… We also understand that the India has a treaty understanding with Bhutan that’s why Indian troops got involved in the area,” the ambassador had reportedly said.

Kumar also refused to divulge details of communication by other countries to India on the Dokalam issue. PTI


India, China troops engage in stone pelting, fisticuffs in eastern Ladakh First such incident in Ladakh in several years

India, China troops engage in stone pelting, fisticuffs in eastern Ladakh
A file photo of the Pangong Tso (lake).

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 15

In a serious turn to the existing tensions between India and China, troops of the two sides clashed on Tuesday, with both pelting stones and hitting each other. Men on both sides were injured.This was the first such incident in several years.Sources confirmed that the incident occurred when land-based patrols of both sides came face to face north of the Pangong Tso (lake) in eastern Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir on Tuesday. It is an area claimed by both countries and is one of the spots where the two countries fought pitched battles during the 1962 war.The Pangong Tso, a 135 km-wide glacial-melt lake, straddles both countries. It has boat patrols from either side. The land patrols are different from these.The spurs of the mountains forming the northern bank of the lake are militarily termed as ‘fingers’. On a west-to-east axis, India claims territory till ‘Finger 8’, but is in physical control till ‘Finger 4’. The aerial distance between the two ‘fingers’ is about 15 km. The land north of these mountains is disputed.Land patrols of both sides often come face to face and a drill is followed to disengage. This includes unfurling of a banner, asking each other to withdraw. This is the first step.New Delhi has asked for a report as the pelting of stones is considered a serious matter. It is not clear who started the stone pelting or how it was triggered.A flag meeting could be held between brigade commanders of either side at the Spanggur Gap, the designated meeting point south of the Pangong Tso.


Maj Gen Satbir Singh Reminds Pb Govt for RS Seat:::Sends his Rep & Disturbs GOG Meet of ESM at Jallandhar

IMG_20170802_140119 IMG_20170802_113546 (1) IMG-20170802-WA0075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its rather a Shameful act and height of Ambition with greed of the JM Battalion Leader that he directs his second-in-command Brig JS Sandhu to reach Jallander at a schedule  meeting of GOG (Guardians of Governance) the brain child of Capt Amarinder Singh to employ the trained force of Ex-Servicemen as his eyes and ears in the administration Governance.

The meeting was to be addressed by Maj Gen SPS Grewal, Vice Chairman of GOG Scheme and Chairman cum Managing Director  PESCO ( Punjab Ex-Servicemen Corporation) .

The meeting was to educate the ESM of Punjab from Various Districts regarding the role and responsibility that ESM will have to shoulder to make the GOG a success. The ESM will be State employs  at Village,Tehsil,Districts and State Level and they7 will paid an honorarium in return of their services. The basic aim of Capt Amarinder Singh being an ESM to restore the lost respectability and dignity of ESM in Punjab and utilize their experience in Punjab Administration.

SATBIR CIRCULATED MESSAGE TO ESM PUNJAB AGAINST CAPTAIN AMARINDER THROUGH WHATS APP.NOW SEEKING RS SEAT

Dear Friends,
We have made serious mistake in supporting Capt Amrindger Singh  in the Elections.
The group of some of our own ESM have not advised him correctly.Capt Amrinder Singh had agreed to 13 issues concerning Def Personnel to be part of priority action of his Govt.
Unfortunately,not even one decision has been taken by CM PUNJAB concerning the agreed 13 points.
I had personally stated these 13 agreed issues on 5th Jan2017 at Cong Hq in the presence of Capt Amrinder Singh,CMs of HPand Utterkhand and other Central leaders of Congress and again during ESM Rally at Jalandhar which was attended by Capt Amrinder Singh .I have written a DO letter to Capt Amrinder Singh about 20 days ago conveying our concerns but no reply has been recd from him.
Till such time this group is around Capt Amrinder Singh,no worthwhile Welfare Measures will be taken up  by Punjab Govt for the welfare of Def Family.
I will be writing another letter to Capt Amrinder Singh.I hope he delivers on the agreed issues of Def Pers Once i receive his reply,i will keep you updated.
AIbEiAIAAABDCMjWy4jVi5f4aSILdmNhcmRfcGhvdG8qKGQ4NWQ2MDI3Y2E2Yjk1OWVjMjc3OGJlMTY2YWIyZjVjM2MyM2M2NTAwASU8grXUaNiWZ7rgtDQorzUloimL
Maj Gen Satbir Singh SM
COMMENTS ON GEN SATBIR  MESSAGE :TRUE FACTS
1. NO letter was written by Maj Gen Satbir to Capt Amarinder but did write to Lt Gen Shergill.
2. The claim of 13 points submitted was too late in the month of Jan 2017 ,to be included in the congress manifesto. The 17 Points which had been included in the Manifesto were out of the written 24 points handed over to Manpreet Badal  By SANJHA MORCHA after a detailed discussions in a meeting held in the month of    OCT IMG-20170802-WA0075, Those who were [resent were Lt Gen Shergill,Maj Gen
SPS Grewal, Lt Gen JS Dhaliwal,Brig JS Jaswal,Brig Inder Mohan, Col Bhag Singh,Col RS Boprai and Col CJS Khera and of course Manpreet Singh Badal
 The only point which was emphasized by Maj Gen Satbir was his nomination to Rajiya Sabha from any of the Congress winning State i.e Punjab,Himachal and Uttrakhand. No such agreement or Commitment was made to satbir as all points which may have been handed over to Capt Amarnder in person had already taken care off.
Maj Gen Satbir was not even aware of Punjab ESM Problem and he took assistance of Col CJS Khera to include points in his list.
DECLARES SUPPORTS TO CONGRESS IN PUNJAB,HIMACHAL AND UTTARAKHAND in DELHI JAN 2017
20170105_123259 20170105_120606
SANJHA MORCHA TEAM ABOVE AT DELHI AND mAJ gEN sATBIR WITH SANJHA MORCHA TEAM BELOW AFTER THE SUPPORT
20170105_134245
3.  Maj Gen Satbir did not come even once to Chandigarh/Punjab to
congradulate Capt Amarinder on his llandslide victory in Punjab,rather he sent some Lady to congratulate Capt Amarinder and make him speak with Capt Amarinder. It sounds so funny and egoistic probably MGS thought he is a National Leader of Jantar Mantar fame and Capt Amarinder is a State Leader/
NOW SATBIR  WANTS RAJIYA SABHA SEAT 
Brig JS Sandhu came as an uninvited person in a meeting og GOG which only pertained to ESM of Punjab. It seems all preplanned by Satbir to remind  his so called 13 Points agenda and impress the ESM further take opportunity to lure and convince ESM of Punjab and avail the best opportunity to garner support of ESM Punjab to elect him as Chairman IESM.
IMG_20170802_113628 (1)
However at the end of Briefing by Maj Gen SPS Grewal , On   Brig JS Sandhu pleading he was giving opportunity to speak to ESM not knowing his intentions were to convey message of Maj Gen Satbir and he started his JM Politics to which he was then and there rebuked by the Chief Guest as it was not the  forum to discuss politics but he was reluctant to listen and kept repeatedly demanding Rajiya Sabha seat for Satbir.
However it was clarified to all ESM  Maj Gen SPS Grewal that he is not aware of any 13 Points handed over to Capt Amarinder nor he was party or called in any meeting held by Satbir with Capt Amarinder. Hence he cannot be the messenger of Satbir.
MAJOR GEN SATBIR carrying  WRONG NOTION THAT  HIS SUPPORT TO CAPT AMARINDER IS CAUSE FOR VICTORY.
Its a simple calculation. IESM headed by Maj Gen satbir does not have more than 3000 members in Punjab.  The members are spread over in all Distt of Punjab. Each Distt does not have more than 200 members  approximately . Even if each member has an average of 5 Votes than only 1000 votes an average in each Distt .Further each ditt has min 4 to 14 Constituencies thus average vote share is 250.
Can Maj Gen Satbir claim that 250 votes per candidate has made the victory of candidate win  by 10000 to 50000 votes .Its unfortunate that where ever IESM had the maximum members the Congress candidate got defeated.
Maj Gen Satbir must come down to Mother earth and know the reality and his contribution.
He supported congress in Delhi Press meet in first week of Jan2017 to Punjab,Himachal and uttrakhand.
The only Rally he attended in support of Capt Amarinder was in Jallander in month of Feb 2017 and there also he did not give time to Capt Amarinder to address the ESM but kept harping his slogan of OROP ” Sada Haq ethe rakh” and in the last he told all to  vote for OROP and not a single time he told the ESM to vote in support of Capt Amarinder.
AT Jallandhar Rally L to R–Col CJS Khera,Capt Amarinder Singh and Maj Gen Satbir Singh in picture below
IMG-20170711-WA0047 (1)
The other organisation which were working since Jul 2016 were IESL and Sanjha Morcha etc. Maj Gen Satbir came at the FAG end by  the time 85% of ESM had made up their mind to support Capt Amarinder and 5 % for Akali and 1% for APP 5% undecided and IESM does not figure any where as it did not decide its support till Feb 2017.
 
If he recalls his behavior and his dramatic acting he should be ashamed for demanding Rajiya sabha Seat after he circulated message to all members of his mistake in supporting Capt Amarinder.
PROMISED CAPT AMARINDER BUT ANNOUNCED FJP AT ISSURU
At Capt Amarinder Singh Residence after Luch on 13 Aug 2016 and there aftyre backtracked for shifting to APP and Launshed Fauji Janta Party to fight elections, He wanted 25 Seats for ESM in Punjab elections but could not provide name of a single probable Candiate to Capt Amarinder
IMG-20160813-WA0074 (2)
8d6b16e6-51ac-4b96-a131-66e297fca33c
MAJ GEN SATBIR A FRUSTRATED PERSON: ALL OUT TO WIN BACK HIS POPULARITY EVEN IF UNINVITED
  There is no end to human ambition or greed to collect more funds or have control over the massive amount collected in crores in IESM account apart from his illegally withdrwn amoun of Rs 60 Lakhs from IESM account  in 2014 for which was granted bail by High Court,Chandigarh
 SATBIR REACTION TO GOG MEET : BLAMES BRIG INDER MOHAN FOR NO RYME OR REASO0N
Maj Gen Satbir is a frustrated individual and JM fame leader history and  lowering his image day by day.
 
TODAY Non of the Ministry or MP wants to see his face or  it speak to him about OROP.History repeats earlier Mr Anthony did not allow him  for 9 yrs.
 He landed up at Sangrur function where  IESL was  celeberating Golden Jublee  organised by Brig Inder Mohan as uninvited Guest in month of Jul 2017. He created an unpleasant atmosphere by his unwarranted OROP speeches.
It is alleged that he handed over approx Rs 2 Lakhs to Hav Sukhdev Singh as reliably learned to make new members from IESL and break IESL member ship and support him and  bring maximum ESM to Jantar Mantar on 05 Aug 2017.
 
He himself landed uninvited at Golden Jubliee Akhand Path of IESL at Sangrur 
 
 Brig JS Sandhu his 2 IC of JM battalion also came uninvited  to disturb GOG meeting addressed by Gen SPS Grewal,CMD PESCO and Vice Chairman GOG at Jallander to remind Capt Amarinder regarding his demand for Rajiya Sabha seat.
 
Later Brig Sandhu was seen pleading ESM to support Gen Satbir for Chairman elections of IESM.
 
 No doubt Maj Gen Satbir  has lost his balance and started blaming Brig Indermohan who was no where nearby GOG meet.
Gen Satbir writes to Brig Indermohan with unwarranted language/wording
👇
Brig Inder Mohan,
1   When will you grow up and attend to what you wish to do for the Def Family.Stop criticising others.
 
2   Please donot spread false and concocted Information.I donot even know that there was a Meeting of ESM at Jalandhar and the Schedule.I donot even know about Brig JS Sandhu attending any such Meeting.
 
3   What are you talking about RS Seat?I have neither asked any one nor given any brief to Brig Sandhu to speak about me on any forum.
 
4   Brig Inder Mohan,HAVE YOU NOT LEARNT YOUR LESSON OF BEING ARROGANT WITH YOUR CRUSHING DEFEAT IN IESL ELECTION?The other Day,you were boasting of OUT RIGHT WIN.
 
5   Once again,please refrain from talking about me,i have nothing to do with you.
Untitled
REPLY OF BRIG INDER MOHAN TO MAJ GEN SATBIR
Dear Gen Satbir,
 
You are talking of growing up.  I thought we are in the last quarter of our lives.
 
Firstly the names mentioned in the post are all known to you and are your confidants. Hope you understand plain English, I just forwarded the post. Not to your liking doesn’t bother me.
 
How come you are not aware your 2ic is in Jalandhar. You wanted RS seat or not is not my concern. But let me tell you. If there is a queue of RS aspirants, you will be too far behind to be visible. And we know you will not be in the queue also. Your place is in JM please be there.
 
About Punjab IESL election I still command more respect and times ahead will show you. You have done a good job, money distribution coming to light. Lt Col SANGHA realising in three way split Inder Mohan will win hands down surrendered his votes getting only 8. Difference between Col Bhag and me only 5 votes. Then I don’t behave like you. When Col Bhag Singh confirmed he doesn’t want to contest I made him a delegate to support me.  Suffice to say, I do not want to write pages on the betrayal, I would have got grass root elections done in the districts where no open elections have been held. Even now they have no standing. In fact very shamelessly they have divided ESM into SIKH and non SIKH votes. What I am doing you all will know in due course. It doesn’t need any organisation for what I am going to do. My bonding with ESM is good enough. And I don’t need show of strength lest I to am like your strength at JM which can be counted on dinners of two hands. What IESL members and large number of other ESM have given me is beyond your comprehension. Mine is payback time for the rest of my life.
 
And yes, unlike you who are always in financial controversies,  with less than Rs 12000 received in subscriptions from new members in  three years, I leave behind Rs 136000 more than I took over. How?  I did not spend a rupee on any expenditure on self. My cars,  my fuel. How about you? One course when donating money between  Jun – Sep 15 gave a cheque of Rs 175000 to IESL Punjab. They knew money in your hands is gone. 30000 in cheque from my Regt officers. 10000 from another offr in Ludhiana and 1000 from an NCO in Tamil Nadu. That’s all. IESL Hq Delhi gave Rs 150000 for travel to  jcos ncos for Anna Hazare really in Delhi,  all paid to 250 participants on 26 Jul 15 I think.
 
The day you imbibe my leadership qualities you would not be running around for getting support for JM.
Just for your Info, visiting Baba Bakala tomorrow to meet Amritsar group for our next venture. We are no more interested in JM or any activity related to begging for better future of ESM. We will show the way to not only ESM of Punjab but the entire country.
 
Got another feed back from some ESM. They are being asked to become members of iesm to vote  for you in your elections. Good luck.
Rest time will tell.
Untitled
Inder Mohan Singh
EARLIER POST REPLIED BY BRIG INDERMOHAN
 [11/10 14:09] Brig Indermohan Ldh:
Gen Satbir, after 20 years I may have erred in your appointment as a brig. That you stayed in a house ahead of the corps HQ  is not forgotten by me. I stand by my visit to your house and your query on your son’s choice. Why do you think I would be lying. Anyway what happened in babina is too fresh to be forgotten.
Problem is with you GEN Satbir. You first split IESM with GEN Kadyan. You lost election Signalman sheoran and recreated a new IESM at Pune.
You didn’t account for a huge sum of money, over ten lakhs, and are in bail now. Somewhere mentioned another case filed for collection at jm last year. Your colleague in the money case has deposed against you. Your correspondence with col ANIL KAUL  is in the open. What more you want to know.
Coming to your service career one thing you missed to mention that JM is a fertile ground for reaping benefits at the cost of ESM.
You think people came to JM because of you. If so what was the result in the 2008. We all were not keen on RHS but only you knew how to garner funds through RHS. 
Yes I whiled away my time. Just to tease you. In 1971 I was the youngest armoured corps officer with three months service in war, without YOs, as a tank commander, in the best performance of the Indian Army in all wars in East Pakistan. Though from armoured corps served in 14, 15 and 16 corps. Was selected in the first lot for UN mission when these recommenced after Gaza in 1988. Attended 14 Army courses, topped three, in top three in the others. I didn’t while away time drinking coffee in IDSA. 
Be careful you may be charged for keeping records of 42 lakh telephones and misusing them. Must have got it from your political benefactor in Punjab and we know who he is.
Finally you have been rewarded well for JM. Given a choice you would keep the money machine running. You have learnt this mantra well. 
Good wishes cannot come from you because I am one who takes you head on, starting last year. I will not wish you well in Punjab take it from me.
Inder Mohan
JANTAR MANTAR A BUSINESS HUB AND VOTE FOR CHAIRMAN
Message from Brig R Vinayak.        
Dear friends,
There is no doubt that Maj Gen Satbir Singh’s efforts in steering the OROP to see the light of the day (even in the present incomplete / deficient from) is unquestionable and credit goes to him.
It is surprising that mostly especially officers are up in arms to defend any criticism against Maj Gen Satbir. How many of us still remember or acknowledge Col BK Sharma who spearheaded the Maj Dhanpalan 4 CPC Rank Pay Case which benefited large number of us to some extent of the other. Even just recently RDOA won a disability pension percentage (rounding off) case which those affected may know better.
I happen to meet a Col (wouldn’t like to name him as he prefers to be low profile and not go public) Prez of an ESM Org that has also been closely associated with ESM affairs and equally involved in negotiating OROP with Government, I asked him why don’t you and other ESM heads including Maj Gen Satbir come on one platform? He laughed and said – Gen Satbir will never join anybody as he has always had political ambitions.
The IESM General Body affairs have also been messed up because of personal squabbles and towering egos of Chairman and claimed to be Chairman.
He vied for political appointment even with BJP pre-2014 Parliamentary elections and when nothing happened he negotiated with opponents of BJP in Bihar Assembly elections and with Congress in 2017 Punjab elections. He also allowed AAP to use JM forum against ruling dispensation. This is the truth of IESM JM faction.
Because of political indulgence of Maj Gen Satbir he has been ignored and sidelined by the Government and not made party to any meeting held in MOD for discussion on 7 CPC / OROP.
Even the Government is delaying implementation of One Man Judicial Commission (OMJC) Report on OROP because of JM activities and their political indulgence with political opponents.
I have been one to one prevailing upon Maj Gen Satbir (whom I still have regard for) to suspend JM agitation but he is adamant not to do so despite my best efforts.
Lot of pushing has been done to resolve the issues of 7 CPC  and is being done without any publicity on social media else it becomes counter productive.
Even the googly of discontinuance of entitled rations in kind for officers in peace stations amongst others is being represented against by Service HQ as well as close group of ESM in the interest of our serving brethren.
Even the Government is being pushed by Service Chiefs and a few ESM who can influence a political decision on OMJC by overruling  bureaucrats who are trying to scuttle it somehow or the other.
Under these circumstances I think Maj Gen Satbir is doing more harm to the ESM now. One has to move ahead rather than bask on past glories of Maj Gen Satbir and hero worship him.
I know his blind worshipers are bound to troll me on this post.
 Good luck. Happy shooting.
 Regards,
 Brig R Vinayak, VSM
OROP CELEBRATED BY MAJ GEN SATBIR AT JM THEN WHY HOLDING TO JM
New Delhi: Ex-servicemen break their fast to withdraw their hunger strike following government's decision to implement 'One Rank One Pension' (OROP) scheme, at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Sunday. PTI Photo by Subhav Shukla(PTI9_6_2015_000087B)
New Delhi: Ex-servicemen break their fast to withdraw their hunger strike following government’s decision to implement ‘One Rank One Pension’ (OROP) scheme, at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Sunday. PTI Photo by Subhav Shukla(PTI9_6_2015_000087B)

07Fir10-11.qxp BL07_13_OROP_2537888f ex-servicemen-celebrate-1441609530081 ex-servicemen-celebrate-14416095300769 colonel-pushpendra-singh-celebrates-with-his-family-member-14416095300976

 CONCLUSION
1. Maj Gen Satbir is all out to be elected as a Chairman of IESM and have control over huge funds in crores.
2. He is self centered and have no love lost for any ESM especially the JCo’s or OR.
3. He has never helped any widow or their children inspite of accumulating crores on person from the donations.
4. Till date he has yet tro visit any Martyrs residence of Punjab or contribute towards any financial assistance to Widow family.
5, JM is the only place he has for self generated employments.
6. The bodies of Martyrs soldiers have been coming via Delhi but he has never ever cared to pay homage to the brave hearts.
7. He will leave Jantar Mantar if elected as Chairman.
8. JM has become a business hub and he has his own Security staff sitting over the Dharna .

Major, jawan killed in encounter with militants in Kashmir’s Shopian

Major, jawan killed in encounter with militants in Kashmir’s Shopian
Major Kamlesh Pandey and jawan Tanzin Chhultim. Image credit: Army

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, August 3

An Army Major and a jawan were killed while two others were injured in an overnight gunfight in south Kashmir’s volatile Shopian district, the police said.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)The militants attacked an Army patrol at Zadipora  Shopian, some 55 kms from Srinagar when joint teams of  forces were laying a cordon in the area at around 2 am following an input about militant presence.”Four Army men, including a Major, were injured in the attack. The injured Army men were shifted to 92 Base Hospital in Srinagar, where the officer and another jawan succumbed to injuries. The condition of the other injured is also stated to be critical,” sources said.SP Shopian, A S Dinkar, confirmed two Army fatalities.Soon after the attack, forces launched an operation in the area. The anti-militancy operation is still underway in the village bordering Shopian and Kulgam. However, sources said the militants managed to escape taking advantage of the darkness.Meanwhile, two militants were killed in an overnight gunfight at Gopalpora Kulgam, over 75 km from Srinagar.Police sources said that the gunfight broke when militants were challenged by joint teams of forces when they were moving in area.”The militant opened fire triggering a gunfight which ended with the killing of two militants,” sources said, adding two AK 47 rifles were also recovered from the encounter site.A police spokesman in Srinagar said that one of the slain militant was involved in killing of five policemen and guards of bank van at Pambay Kulgam in May.


Live To Fight Another Day: That Is What The Mutual Withdrawal From Doklam Means by Lt Gen Syed Ata Husnain

Live To Fight Another
Day: That Is What The Mutual Withdrawal From Doklam Means

SNAPSHOT

What should make us all happy is that the Prime Minister is going to BRICS Summit without having to be worried about the borders.

After all it’s always good to live to fight another day; where and how soon, only time will tell.

Authorised media in both India and China has announced that both nations have been in diplomatic engagement, as a result of which there is mutual agreement to disengage troops from the Doklam Plateau. The latter landmark, with which much of the Indian public now appears familiar, lies at the eastern edge of the Chumbi Valley and is a territory belonging to Bhutan.

In June this year, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) decided to construct a road through the plateau, which it claims as its legitimate territory, to bring its logistics reach nearer the Indian post of Doka La near the tri-junction, where the boundaries of India, Bhutan and China meet. By doing this the PLA was in effect also improving its operational and logistics capability to threaten India’s highly strategic and vulnerable sliver of territory called the Siliguri Corridor. This corridor provides India the only land access to its seven north eastern states. The PLA activated this front after an interval of time through this road construction.

However, Indian troops crossed over to Bhutanese territory and prevented further construction of the road. A 72-day standoff ensued which has had both countries and much of the international community on tenterhooks. It was a strange military standoff, where both sides maintained their balance, did not resort to any physical shootouts and apart for the initial jostling between the troops (and on India’s Independence Day a more serious exchange of stones, sticks and fisticuffs in a different area) only continued to attempt staring each other down. That was on until the announcement on 28 August 2017 that mutual disengagement had been agreed upon.

A few more issues of the background may be relevant for full public comprehension. This standoff was not anywhere on the un-demarcated Line of Actual Control (LAC) of which perceptions differ and which leads to transgressions into each other’s perceived territory. This was on a third country’s territory and India has the 2007 agreement with Bhutan for mutual assistance in the event of threats to each other’s security.

The PLA has gradually increased its activities of transgression over the last 15 years or a little more. There have been standoffs in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh too, but none have had this kind of vitriolic backing of crude psychological warfare through the instrument of the official media in China; both Global Times and People’s Daily carried typical government drafted messages without any subtlety and Chinese television channels included commentaries by some analysts in terrible English. That the standoff has ended is a reflection of maturity on part of the two countries despite the fact that China had made it clear that there was no way its troops would leave the Doklam area.

It has happened before the BRICS Summit coming up early next month in the Chinese city of Xiamen, where Chinese President Xi Jinping will play host to the important club of middle powers. One of the reasons for the mutual disengagement appears to be the potential embarrassment to Xi Jinping in his stewardship of the summit. That obviously is the whole reason. I did appreciate that the standoff would probably continue at lower level of displayed energy right through to the 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party where Xi Jinping’s future power and status will be decided.

Quite obviously, the PLA’s gambit had not worked and although it adopted the concept of war under ‘informationised’ conditions over two decades ago, its crude handling of psychological warfare proved ineffective. If anything, it hardened India’s resolve to risk what may be called ‘sticking it out’.

The standoff moved through some interesting strategic moments. While China expected India to withdraw forthwith due to a perception of the latter’s supposed weak military disposition, it did not have a ‘Plan B’ ready that would cater for the eventuality of India deciding to stick it out. Fresh from its perceived strategic success in the South China Sea, and after defying the ruling of the international tribunal, China possibly felt it could ride rough shod over India. It hoped to appropriately send India a message by embarrassing it in a military confrontation; that message was equally for nations with whom India is in potential league for strategic partnerships, Japan in particular.

As the standoff progressed into a long stalemate, the advantage appeared to shift to India creating a situation, where a mutual disengagement through diplomatic negotiation would end to India’s moral advantage. The inability of an adversary to achieve its strategic aim is long considered a victory by the other side. However, care needs to be taken not to call this disengagement a victory for India.

The term ‘victory in conflict’ (and the conflict spectrum does classify this standoff as a conflict) is one of the most debated terminologies in military parlance. The management of victory isn’t the easiest even for the most seasoned diplomatic corps or military because it has negative spinoffs which can hardly be perceived immediately. Thus the situation may well be termed as ‘advantage India’ without spelling out the domain, diplomatic or military. While many may contest this and hawks would like to project victory for various reasons, they need to be cautioned because this is not the end of Sino-Indian confrontation. The likelihood of needling and triggering similar or near similar situations through ‘walk-ins’ across the LAC in other areas such as Ladakh, Barahoti and Arunachal Pradesh, would remain live.

India’s strategic analysts must not be drawn into the victory defining game and would do much more justice if they pressurised the government to ensure that the long-pending and slowly-progressing border infrastructure is hastened as much as the acquisition of hardware and ammunition for which sizeable recent financial allocations have been made. It must not return to business as usual in these crucial fields. What is even more important is not to be led away to believe that only quiet diplomacy succeeds.

In future situations, the possibility of the intense need for a developed and well thought through communication strategy may be a virtual compulsion. How is this to be done and which body, institution or organisation has the professional expertise to undertake this is a question mark. This time China did not use its force multipliers such as cyber warfare but possibly tested some models in the live environment. The next time this will be a crucial domain and India must step up its expertise in this through a combination of military cyber and information capability, largely manned through civilian intake. That will deliver permanence and specialisation at the cutting edge, while uniformed personnel can lend it a military orientation.

One of the earliest analyses of the Doklam standoff done by me suggested a line that China would keep India engaged at the land boundaries through unresolved border disputes and frequent standoffs. The purpose of these operations would be to lend weight to India’s obsession with continental security. The urgency with which India needs to ramp up its maritime capability cannot be over emphasised. That will have China worried especially if strategic partnerships with the US, Japan, Australia, Vietnam and South Korea are established in the maritime domain, and Malabar-type exercises get progressively enhanced in scope. After all, as they say, China is still a landlocked country; its access to the Pacific does not give it the advantage it seeks. It is the Indian Ocean that it looks at. The Indian Ocean has a distinct Indian advantage and China’s worries about its energy security and trade stem from that.

At the end of the day what should make us all happy is that the Prime Minister is going to BRICS without having to be worried about the borders. After all it’s always good to live to fight another day; where and how soon, only time will tell.


DC was left to fend for herself Injured young officer pressed Army into action to avoid Jat stir repeat

DC was left to fend for herself
DC Gauri Parasher Joshi surrounded by security personnel in Panchkula on Friday. TRIBUNE PHOTO: RAVI KUMAR

Nitin Jain

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 26

It could have been a repeat of the unprecedented Jat agitation violence that had rocked Haryana in February 2016, if Deputy Commissioner Gauri Parasher Joshi had not pressed the Army into action when violence and arson reigned supreme in Panchkula on Friday.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)After being outnumbered by the thousands of rampaging dera followers, the local police had fled the spot, leaving the young officer to almost fend for herself.It was her experience of having served in the Naxal-affected district of Kalahandi in Odisha that helped the 2009-batch IAS officer from Odisha cadre, who is on deputation to Haryana, not only to save her life but also to save the situation from totally slipping out of control.The Panchkula violence and arson left at least 32 dead and more than 250 persons injured, besides damaging property worth crores of rupees.As the mob turned violent on hearing the news of the conviction of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, the 36-year-old District Magistrate faced stone-throwing by the rampaging dera followers, who had swarmed Panchkula for the past couple of days, for some time by herself, as the police force beat a hasty retreat (read fled the spot).During the ensuing violence and arson, this mother of an 11-month-old suffered injuries and even her clothes got torn. Left alone with a single PSO, she then decided to go to her office and issue an order to hand over the situation to the Army, which helped avoid further deterioration of the situation.In the chaotic situation, she again returned to the field. “It was the concern for the city, which was on the boil, that remained uppermost in my mind,” said the bureaucrat.On Saturday, Gauri reached home at 3 am but not before going around every nook and corner of the city and seeing for herself that the situation had been brought under control after dispersing the rioters. After spending a few hours, she left again for the field.During the violence on Friday, the injured DC continued to boost the morale of the district machinery. “When I reached home in the wee hours, the family was shocked to see my blood-soaked clothes,” shared the journalist-turned-bureaucrat, an English Literature postgraduate from Delhi’s St Stephen’s College.“She, however, still refused to go to hospital, saying that the hospital resources were too stretched and did not want to dislocate their work for her relatively less serious injury,” recalled her 2003-batch IAS officer husband Ajit Balaji Joshi, who is the Deputy Commissioner in Chandigarh.


Sirsa DC orders attachment of Dera’s assets

Sushil Manav

Tribune News Service

Sirsa, August 27

Deputy Commissioner Prabhjot Singh on Sunday ordered assets of Dera Sacha Sauda to be attached, following the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Friday order.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

The high court had ordered the sect to pay for the losses of property caused by its followers after its head Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh was found guilty of rape on Friday.

Thirty-six people died and hundreds were injured in clashes that broke out after Singh was held guilty of sexually assaulting two female followers in 2002.

A court will announce Singh’s sentence on Monday.


27 yrs on, retired colonel gets 5-yr jail in disproportionate assets case

CHANDIGARH: Twenty-seven years after a retired colonel was booked for corruption, a special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court awarded five years jail to him on Tuesday.

Colonel BS Goraya (retired), 75, has been held guilty under Sections 13(1) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The CBI court has also imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh on him, for acquiring properties disproportionate to his assets. It was among the oldest cases at the Chandigarh district courts.

“Being a senior army officer, he was having a responsibility to keep a watch over the conduct of his subordinates,” stated the judgment. “Instead of becoming a role model for society and bring pride for the nation, he grossly misused his high position and committed criminal misconduct to accumulate huge wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income by illegal means.”

Between January 1, 1987, and August 8, 1990, Goraya, a Sector-9 resident, and some of his family members — wife Parveen Goraya, daughter Manveen Goraya and one Guninder Singh — acquired properties valued at ₹82.6 lakh. Of these, they could not account for properties worth ₹72.7 lakh, the CBI had claimed. However, while pronouncing the order, the court of Gaganjeet Kaur said assets worth ₹66.94 lakh were disproportionate to his known sources of income.

A case was registered against the Colonel General Staff (engineer headquarters, Western Command) in August 1990.

During the hearing on Tuesday, Goraya pleaded for leniency in sentence, stating that he was 75. He said his wife was 72 and a heart and diabetes patient, hence dependant on him.

In February this year, the court of chief judicial magistrate (CJM) Akshdeep Mahajan had sentenced Goraya to two-year rigorous imprisonment for selling his agricultural property that had been attached in Punjab.

The CBI had also pointed that Goraya had not paid any property returns, except in 1987, after joining the army. In March this year, the HC dismissed Goraya’s plea challenging the trial court decision of not allowing examination of additional witnesses.

Senior public prosecutor Pawan Dogra and public prosecutor KP Singh represented the CBI.

The defence plans to move the high court as early as this week.

UNEXPECTED, SAY KIN

Goraya’s family members, including his daughters, son and grandson, were present in court the entire day. The former army officer,who was seen lifting his family’s spirits before the quantum was pronounced, looked equally grim after the order.

Disturbed by what they called “unexpected”, family members were seen consoling each other as Goraya requested cops to let him talk to his daughter in private.

A LONG DELAY

The FIR was registered on August 6, 1990, post which Col Goraya was put under suspension on August 17,1990, and dismissed from service on March 19, 1993

The challan in the corruption case was filed by the CBI in 1993, as the inquiry was pending all this while

The cross-examination and recording of evidence by investigating officer Makhan Singh alone took seven years. It was carried out through video-conferencing from the PGIMER as Col Goraya developed a serious heart ailment The defence got seven months to present witnesses

According to defence counsel SPS Bhullar, who especially summoned the senior superintendent of police (SSP) when the case was registered, SSP Negi did not give clear answers during cross-examination. He stated he didn’t remember most of the facts during the investigation

The retired colonel didn’t engage a lawyer initially and was “forced” to appear in person. He deposed in court on Tuesday that only towards the “fag end of the case, was he able to engage a lawyer”

As per judgment, the convict stated that he appeared in different courts (including high court and Supreme Court) over “500 times” and never sought a single adjournment or missed any hearing