Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

‘Sacking’ the GeneralbyLt General P.C.KATOCH |

Bureaucratic controls


 How our politico-bureaucratic dispensation hates the military has numerous examples. When General VK Singh was the serving Army Chief, fodder-eating Lalu Prasad Yadav, referring to him, snapped his fingers and said isko masal dena chahiye – squash him! Later under pressure he apologized to the General privately but avoided a public apology.

At a seminar at the IAS academy in Mussoorie some years ago, Major General Ian Cardozo, noting the diatribe against our military by former diplomat TCA Raghavan asked him, “Do you hate us?” His immediate response was, “Of course we do. Don’t you know it?” Possibly Raghavan slept under his cot during his two-year tenure at Islamabad as High Commissioner fearing the Pakistani military.

In 2013, a former defence secretary who had also served as home secretary, said in a speech in Delhi that the Service Chiefs were not delivering as required while the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was professionally doing a fine job (sic). He wouldn’t mention what the Chiefs were not delivering but added that veterans should not write against bureaucrats (scared of exposes?).

Administrations derive arrogance from the politico-bureaucratic-arms mafia nexus. Government permission is necessary to be able to question bureaucrats, so it is never sought and never granted.

No MoD bureaucrat has ever been questioned or indicted despite scores of scams. Successive administrations surrender to the ‘deep state’ described in the 1993 Vohra Committee Report that was not followed up. It is always ‘Votes First’.

In the latest case of seemingly administrative vengeance, Major General Vasu Vardhan, Commandant of the Army Base Hospital in Delhi was unceremoniously ‘sacked’ despite doing an excellent job with extreme dedication in combating the pandemic. Yes ‘sacked’ because his immediate transfer as an OSD to another hospital was just three months short of him hanging up his uniform.

Lt General Satish Dua, former 15 Corps Commander tweeted on May 9: “Commandant of Base Hospital, Maj Gen Vasu Vardhan lost his mother yesterday. He was still helping those who needed help even when performing last rites. A post by Lt Gen Agarwal (R) on whatsapp. Heartfelt condolences and a General Salute.”

Media quotes the Army as saying that Vardhan’s posting is routine. A second follow up Army statement said the posting is to de-stress him. Such postings are dealt by the Director General Armed Forces Medical Services, which is directly under MoD. Then who ordered the Army to issue these clarifications – Brown Saheb (BS), the Defence Secretary, or the CDS?

The bit about “de-stressing” 3-months before retiring is laughable but if the largesse is by the BS-CDS then might as well institute it for the rank and file of the military.

Vardhan’s removal comes at a time when the government wants to engage 400 retired AMC officers hoping the measly terms offered, without even an insurance cover, will get an overwhelming response. As someone said, if you offer peanuts, you only get monkeys.

Ex-AMC doctors don’t idle at home enjoying spoils of service like ex-bureaucrats. Also, the stipulation that only AMC officers who left the service since January 2017 can apply in such desperate times is strange, unless they are also expected to play kabaddi.

One narrative in circulation alleges someone from MoD demanded Remedsvir injections to which Vardhan responded by saying these are needed by patients in Base Hospital. A second narrative has an undersecretary smugly posing like Marlon Brando, allegedly asking for pandemic-related medicines and equipment to be delivered to homes of certain VVIPs. This also was refused. The DRDO’s Covid facility where the defence minister had a photo-op is staffed by the Army, pulling out resources from elsewhere including from the Base Hospital despite being under tremendous pressure.

As Home Minister, the present Defence Minister went all out to alleviate the police forces. That zeal is missing today. He has nothing to say even about the over 5,000 Covid-afflicted military personnel. Incidentally, accolades for the 2-DG drug should go to Dr Reddy’s Labs Private Ltd that manufactured the drug, not to DRDO for facilitating government approval.

The current Chief of Defence Staff had wanted a two front war when he was the Army Chief. Yet, the 2020 Chinese aggression surprised us completely. But it is the BS who is charged with the defence of India and defence policy including in war, the CDS being just another secretary. Had the BS accompanied the Prime Minister to Leh after the Chinese aggression, they may have told him on the return flight, “Brown Saheb, aapne toh hamen marwa diya”.

In 2019, an article by a former Vice Chief of Army Staff, carrying the photo of the then Army Chief (now CDS) appeared in the media. It warned against senior military officers making political statements in the media and cautioned that a politicized military is one that exercises loyalty to a single political party, not the Constitution.

Ironically, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2016 dictum that we cannot progress “with administrative systems of the 19th century” was followed up by the same 19th century bureaucrats. The only change effected was that nine joint secretaries were laterally inducted in different departments under IAS bosses, changing nothing. Some left midway in disgust. So the 19th century babus continue to rule the roost; holding polity to ransom and sniggering at the forces. Arrogance enables acting shamelessly with impunity.

The Army appears overly cautious, perhaps taking a cue from the sinking of a naval submarine running on outdated batteries a few years ago while the MoD sat for 15 months on the case to sanction replacement batteries that were available in India. Nothing happened to the babus who can sit on files endlessly and starve the forces. Private firms must grease palms to move their cases.

Recall the series of orchestrated accidents in the Navy that caused a Naval Chief to resign. And, a Naval Chief was prematurely dismissed because he favoured joint submarine production with South Korea while the deep state wanted the HDW deal – you can guess why? So Vardhan is small fry for them.

Had Vardhan acquiesced and not bothered about patients dying at the Base Hospital, the Brown Saheb (and CDS?) may have ensured a SYSM award for him for exemplary services in a biological war. His sacking raises a terrible stink even though it is just another routine act for the administration and more like this might well follow.

Lt General P.C. Katoch is a veteran of the Indian Army. Views expressed are personal.
 

Transfer of Delhi base hospital's commandant part of larger HR management  plan: Indian Army - The Economic Times

Indus Super Speciality Hospital, Mohali is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Punjab region

Dear ECHS Beneficiaries.

Indus Super Speciality Hospital, Mohali is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Punjab region.

*Following are the 24/7 Clinical Department for our ECHS Beneficiaries*

1. Oncology (Medical, Surgical, Radiation)
2. Cardiac Sciences 
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery                   
4. Orthopedics & Joint Replacement
5. Neurology
6. Neuro & Spine Surgery
7. Nephrology & Renal Transplant 
8. Urology
9. Gastroenterology
10. Gastro Surgery
11. Critical Care & Trauma
12. General Surgery
13. Laparoscopic Surgery
14. Internal Medicine
15. Gynaecology & Obstetrics
16. Pediatrics
17. Psychiatriy
18. Ophthalmology
19. Physiotherapy
20. Radiology
21. ENT
22. Dental

*Apart from this we have 24 Hrs Services of:*

1. Largest ICU facility
2. NICU
3. Lab (NABL)
4. Dialysis
5. Ambulance service
6. Pharmacy
7. Canteen
8. Blood Bank
9. Diet counseling

Indus Super Speciality Hospital provides personal care to all its patients and their relatives, for which we have a dedicated help-line and staff to cater to all the needs of ECHS Beneficiaries.

Contact Person’s :-
Mr Inderdeep Singh (Director) :- 9888110310
Mrs Renuka (Coordinator) :- 9464378167

aras Hospitals Panchkula wishes you a great Health!!

As you must be aware that Paras Hospitals Panchkula is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Panchkula is now empanelled with ECHS

*Following are the 24/7 Clinical Department for our ECHS Beneficiaries*

1. Oncology (Medical, Surgical, Radiation, Ortho Oncology)
2. Cardiac Sciences 
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery                   
4. Orthopedics & Joint Replacement
5. Neurology
6. Neuro & Spine Surgery
7. Nephrology & Renal Transplant (Including Dialysis)
8. Urology
9. Gastroenterology
10. Gastro Surgery
11. Critical Care & Trauma
12. Neurology
13. General Surgery
14. Laparoscopic Surgery
15. Internal Medicine
16. Radiology
17. ENT

Apart from above said services Paras Hospitals is equipped with State of the Art Linear Accelerator (LINAC) Radiation machine. Which is capable of delivering very precise radiation to the tumours and in the process saves normal organ around the tumour.

You can contact Mr. Paras Jagga (Head – Corproate Relations) at 7307731113 and Mr. Gaurav Wadhwa (Asst Manager) at 6284728822 for any related queries.

Stay Safe Stay Healthy

Ivy Hospital, Mohali is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Punjab region.

*Following are the 24/7 Clinical Department for our ECHS Beneficiaries*

1. Oncology (Medical, Surgical, Radiation)
2. Cardiac Sciences 
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery                   
4. Orthopedics & Joint Replacement
5. Neurology
6. Neuro & Spine Surgery
7. Nephrology & Renal Transplant 
8. Urology
9. Gastroenterology
10. Gastro Surgery
11. Critical Care & Trauma
12. Neurology
13. General Surgery
14. Laparoscopic Surgery
15. Internal Medicine
16. Gynaecology & Obstetrics
17. Pediatrics
18. Psychiatric
19. Dental
20. Ophthalmology
21. Physiotherapy
22. Radiology
23. ENT

*Apart from this we have 24 Hrs Services of:*

1. Largest ICU facility
2. NICU
3. Lab (NABL)
4. Dialysis
5. Ambulance service
6. Pharmacy
7. Canteen
8. Blood Bank
9. Diet counseling

IVY provides personal care to all its patients and their relatives, for which we have a dedicated help-line and staff to cater to all the needs of ECHS Beneficiaries.

SGHS Hospital Sohana, Sector 77, Mohali is 400 bed NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital & is having NABL accredited Diagnostic/Laboratory also.

*Having 24X7 Médical Services*

1. Oncology Services.
2. Cardiology Services.
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery.                     
4. Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement.
5. Neuro Services.
6. Nephrology & Dialysis.
7. Urology Services.
8. Gastroenterology.
9. General Surgery.
10. Critical Care &  Trauma.
11. Dermatology & Venereology.
12. Internal Medicine.
13. Respiratory Medicine. 
14. Gynaecology & Obstetrics
15. Pediatrics Services.
16. Psychiatric Services.
17. Dental Services.
18. Ophthalmology Services.
19. Physiotherapy.
20. ENT.
21. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.
22. Emergency Medicine.

*Apart from this, 24X7    Services of:*

1.  ICU/CCU/NICU facility.
2. Lab (NABL).
3. Dialysis.
4. Ambulance service.
5. Pharmacy.
6. Canteen.
7. Blood Bank / Apheresis/ plasmapheresis/ platelet pheresis.
9.Ultrasound/CT/MRI etc.
10. Dietetics.
11. Emergency

SGHS HOSPITAL SOHANA , Sector 77, Mohali provides quality medical services to all patients and care/counselling to their relatives, for which we have a dedicated help-line / counselling staff to cater to all the needs of patients.
Contact : 9814095240

Dear ECHS Beneficiaries.

Indus International Hospital, Derabassi is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Punjab region.

*Following are the 24/7 Clinical Department for our ECHS Beneficiaries*

1. Oncology (Medical, Surgical, Radiation)
2. Cardiac Sciences 
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery                   
4. Orthopedics & Joint Replacement
5. Neurology
6. Neuro & Spine Surgery
7. Nephrology & Renal Transplant 
8. Urology
9. Gastroenterology
10. Gastro Surgery
11. Critical Care & Trauma
12. General Surgery
13. Laparoscopic Surgery
14. Internal Medicine
15. Gynaecology & Obstetrics
16. Pediatrics
17. Psychiatriy
18. Ophthalmology
19. Physiotherapy
20. Radiology
21. ENT
22. Dental

*Apart from this we have 24 Hrs Services of:*

1. Largest ICU facility
2. NICU
3. Lab (NABL)
4. Dialysis
5. Ambulance service
6. Pharmacy
7. Canteen
8. Blood Bank
9. Diet counseling

Indus International Hospital provides personal care to all its patients and their relatives, for which we have a dedicated help-line and staff to cater to all the needs of ECHS Beneficiaries.

Contact Person’s :-
Mr Inderdeep Singh (Director) :- 9888110310
Mr Pankaj (Coordinator) :-  9915616187

Dear ECHS Beneficiaries.

Indus Super Speciality Hospital, Mohali is the largest NABH accredited Super Specialty Hospital in the Punjab region.

*Following are the 24/7 Clinical Department for our ECHS Beneficiaries*

1. Oncology (Medical, Surgical, Radiation)
2. Cardiac Sciences 
3. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery                   
4. Orthopedics & Joint Replacement
5. Neurology
6. Neuro & Spine Surgery
7. Nephrology & Renal Transplant 
8. Urology
9. Gastroenterology
10. Gastro Surgery
11. Critical Care & Trauma
12. General Surgery
13. Laparoscopic Surgery
14. Internal Medicine
15. Gynaecology & Obstetrics
16. Pediatrics
17. Psychiatriy
18. Ophthalmology
19. Physiotherapy
20. Radiology
21. ENT
22. Dental

*Apart from this we have 24 Hrs Services of:*

1. Largest ICU facility
2. NICU
3. Lab (NABL)
4. Dialysis
5. Ambulance service
6. Pharmacy
7. Canteen
8. Blood Bank
9. Diet counseling

Indus Super Speciality Hospital provides personal care to all its patients and their relatives, for which we have a dedicated help-line and staff to cater to all the needs of ECHS Beneficiaries.

Contact Person’s :-
Mr Inderdeep Singh (Director) :- 9888110310
Mrs Renuka (Coordinator) :- 9464378167


Don’t overdo leasing of military equipment

When equipment is procured or leased, it is subordinate to the MoD’s overstretched budget due to shrinking outlays and large liability payments for previously acquired materiel. Hence, unbridled equipment leasing will pressure the services’ shrinking capital budgets and impact their revenue budgets which will have to bear the cost of maintaining the leased equipment.

Don’t overdo leasing of military equipment

Indiscriminate: All three services are negotiating to lease varied platforms. PTI

Amit Cowshish and Rahul Bedi

Amit Cowshish, Ex-Financial Adviser, acquisition, MoD & Rahul Bedi, Senior journalist

Beset by a continuing financial crunch, India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and its armed forces have seized upon leasing an assortment of badly needed platforms and equipment from abroad to mitigate enduring operational gaps.

Hyped as an ‘innovative’ alterative, leasing was introduced as yet another procurement category in the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020 (DAP-2020) launched last October.

The DAP-2020 claims that leasing military equipment was ‘advantageous’ as it enabled the armed forces to swiftly acquire assets without incurring large capital expenditure and other administrative costs, besides allaying obsolescence handicaps.

Consequently, all three services had initiated a flood of inquiries and negotiations to lease varied platforms like naval utility helicopters (NUHs), mid-air refuellers, basic training aircraft, minesweepers and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), among other kit.

But in their keenness to haphazardly pursue this unexplored leasing option, the MoD, military, defence analysts and media appear to have disregarded that lease rent and other associated costs have to be disbursed from the existing stressed budget outlay. Besides lease rent payable to potential lessors over pre-determined intervals, the high cost of modifying platforms or equipment to meet the military’s operational requirements and insuring them too would have to be borne by the respective services from their annually shrinking outlays. As, of course, would the eventual cost of rendering the equipment, upon its lease expiry to its original state in keeping with the accepted standard international practice.

Maintaining the equipment to standards stipulated by the lessor too would be the respective services’ responsibility, unless otherwise specified. This cost could even be higher if the equipment were to be serviced and maintained by the lessor as such an eventuality would entail stationing an upkeep crew in India for extended periods.

Principally, however, whenever equipment is procured or leased, it is subordinate to the MoD’s already overstretched budget due to shrinking outlays and large committed liability payments for previously acquired materiel.

Hence, unbridled equipment leasing by the services will not only pressure their shrinking capital budgets but also impact their revenue budgets which will have to bear the expense of maintaining the leased equipment.

In short, the leasing of materiel sounds appealing, but indiscriminate renting, given the MoD’s penurious financial milieu, would be problematic. In the fiscal year 2020-21, for instance, the MoD was allocated Rs 1,24,203 crore towards capital expenditure for all three services against the Rs 2,01,286 crore which they had demanded. Even for operating revenue expenditure, the allocation was Rs 48,298 crore less than what was claimed. This, in turn, led to the Parliamentary Defence Committee cautioning the MoD against the embarrassing possibility of it defaulting on its committed liability payments, as it could reflect on India’s solvency in the global arms bazaar.

On a lighter note, one analyst remarked that the MoD’s prevailing adverse fiscal situation could end up mirroring the dilemma of an indigent, but indulgent, British aristocrat. In his unplanned and financially profligate existence, this worthy had once expansively declared that since he had no money to pay his tailor, he would simply order another suit. In all likelihood, such reasoning would find no takers in the cutthroat armament marketplace.

Meanwhile, the Indian Navy — presently operating INS Chakra, its second nuclear-powered attack submarine leased from Moscow and with a replacement boat similarly agreed upon — is the first of the three services to have fast-tracked leasing. Late last year, it had leased two non-weaponised Medium-Altitude Long-Endurance (MALE) MQ-9B Sea Guardian UAVs from the US to monitor for one year. These UAVs have been operating from INS Rajali in Tamil Nadu, but their leasing terms remain classified.

And, last month, the Navy had invited responses from overseas vendors by June 18 regarding its planned five-year lease of 24 NUHs and related support equipment to replace its fleet of legacy licence-built Chetak helicopters, inducted into service since the 1960s.

The Navy’s April 15 Request for Information to original equipment manufacturers, authorised leasing firms and government-sponsored export agencies stated that five-ton rotorcraft were needed to execute search and rescue and medical evacuation missions from ships at sea and to perform communication tasks and low-intensity maritime operations by day and night. The proposed helicopters — to be delivered to the IN within two years of the contract being signed — would need to have a residual service life of 15 years at the commencement of the lease. The lessor would also be responsible for training the rotorcraft’s air and technical crew in keeping with the delivery schedule.

The MoD is also in advanced negotiations with the French Government to lease one Airbus Defence and Space A330 multi-role tanker transport aircraft for the Indian Air Force (IAF) for training purposes. The proposed tanker that would be operated by the IAF, but maintained by the French Air Force, would in all likelihood be succeeded by leasing five more A330s to augment the reach and, hence, combat capability of the force’s combat aircraft.

The A330s have been under consideration after these tankers, operated by the French and UAE air forces, had refuelled 21 Dassault Rafale multi-role fighters to India from France since July 2020. The IAF’s remaining 15 Rafales will also be similarly refuelled by the A330s. The IAF is also considering leasing 20 basic trainer aircraft to make up for the existing shortages.

In January, the Indian Army (IA) leased four Israel Aerospace Industries MALE UAVs in response to the continuing face-off with China’s People’s Liberation Army that began last May. Proposals for additional equipment for the IA are anticipated.

In conclusion, while there is no argument regarding critical equipment voids in the military or about selectively filling them via leasing of equipment, opting indiscriminately for this conduit will adversely impact the MoD’s already pressured kitty. Fiscal and force planning remain critical.


Covid-19: 99-year old veteran donates Rs 1 lakh to Army in Jalandhar

The soldier visited the Sub Area Headquarters in Jalandhar

Covid-19: 99-year old veteran donates Rs 1 lakh to Army in Jalandhar

99-year old veteran donates Rs 1 lakh to Army. — Tribune Photo

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, May 19

A 99-year-old former soldier, from the British times, has donated Rs 1 lakh to the Army for fighting the Covid-19 pandemic.

The soldier, Lance Naik Kesho Lal Verma, visited the Sub Area Headquarters in Jalandhar on Wednesday, and handed over a cheque to senior Army officers.

According to available details, he had served in the erstwhile Royal Indian Army Service Corps, and was deployed with the British Army’s South East Asia Command.


22 bodies found in Arabian Sea, 53 still missing

A massive search operation is on for the past 48 hours

22 bodies found in Arabian Sea, 53 still missing

he first lot of rescued people from the sunk barge reach Mumbai on Wednesday.

Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, May 19

Twenty-two bodies have been found in the Arabian Sea and are possibly of the persons who were on board the ill-fated barge ‘P305’ that sunk on the night intervening May 17 & May 18.

Two more survivors have been found, taking the number of those rescued from the barge to 186. Still, 53 persons are missing at sea.A DNA match of the victims would reveal their identity. A DNA sample has been collected, as part of protocol, of those working on oil rigs and at the sea.

The barge was working at the Heera oil rig, part of the Bombay High oil rigs, 70 km south-west of Mumbai. It was part of six separate vessels that had been adrift at sea since Monday following the Cyclone Tauktae. All were connected with oil-drilling work or new projects at Bombay High.

Also, the number of persons on board the ill-fated barge ‘P305’ has been down, revised from the 273 announced earlier to 261. The Navy had initially said 273 were on board the barge and this was based on the first SOS message.

The Oil and Natural Gas Commission clarified that the number on board the barge was 261. The Navy too has confirmed the figure.  A massive search operation is on for the past 48 hours.

The first lot of rescued men arrived in Mumbai on board INS Kochi, the Indian Naval warship. Three other warships, planes and helicopters continue their search for those missing at sea. INS Teg, INS Betwa and INS Beas are at the location.

Maritime reconnaissance plane P8I, fitted with sharp sensors, is scanning the area. Helicopters with sensors too are at the location. All the copters can land on decks of the available ships at sea.

The tugs of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) are towing the drill ship Sagar Bhushan and barge ‘Support Station 3’ to harbour. Food and drinking water have been provided to crew onboard these vessels by the Indian Navy copters. Both are carrying 297 men on board.

All the 137 personnel on barge GAL Constructor were rescued on Tuesday by the Navy and the Coast Guard.

Also read: 

Below are the helpline numbers shared by the Navy:

AFCONS Helpdesk and Support Team:

Karandeep Singh: +919987548113, 022-71987192

Prasun Goswami: 8802062853

ONGC Helpline:

022-2627 4019

022-2627 4020

022-2627 4021

Multiple rescue ops

  • P305: Barge sinks near oil rigs, 183 rescued by 7.30 pm on Tuesday, ops on to trace 90 persons
  • Gal Constructor: Runs aground 90 km off Mumbai, all 137 safe
  • Support Station-3: 196 on board, being towed to harbour
  • Sagar Bhushan: 101 on board, being towed to harbour
  • Deshbhakt, Greatship Aditi: 45 crew on both vessels, propulsion restored on Deshbhakt, Aditi being towed to harbour

Lt Gen Ata Hasnain*. It shows in unambiguous ways that the *Indian Army is the highest example of true secularism*

Lt Gen Ata Hasnain*.
It shows in unambiguous ways that the *Indian Army is the highest example of true secularism*. This is a must read piece.

Excerpts:

As Muslims, both my spouse and i invariably led the puja of our army unit in its temple every other Sunday…Personally, I come from a regiment which is purely Hindu and has a regimental deity in *Lord Badri Vishal*, the personification of *Lord Vishnu* at the Badrinath shrine. As the head of the regiment i have invoked the blessings of Lord Badri Vishal by personally travelling to the shrine many times for the opening puja of the season after winter. As a senior commander in Kashmir some of *my most satisfying moments were those when i did a round robin of all gurdwaras of the units on Guru Purab*, ending with langar with the unit usually deployed in the most difficult area.

Once in a Muslim Grenadiers unit, its *Hindu company commander* put me to shame when i saw that he was *keeping all 30 rozas with his men and even reading all five namaz* which he knew perfectly.

When *my fauji father* was questioned during Partition about his choice of armies, he said: *“While the nation formed on basis of faith will celebrate now but won’t last forever, the nation formed on basis of respect for every faith will have a difficult beginning but will always celebrate.”* He remained with the Indian Army and *rose to be its first Muslim GOC*. When India has doubts about itself and the future course of inter faith relations it should *just turn to its army for inspiration;* there nothing changes, it only becomes better.
==============
*JAI HIND*
*जय हिंद*


CHINESE PLA EXERCISING IN ITS DEPTH AREAS OPPOSITE LADAKH

PM Modi and Chinese Dictator Jinping during happier times
NEW DELHI: More than a year after the Chinese army displayed aggression on the northern front, the People’s Liberation Army is carrying out an exercise in their depth areas near the Eastern Ladakh sector.
The Indian armed forces are also fully alert this year despite the Covid-19 pandemic and keeping a close watch on all these movements of the Chinese forces there.
“The Chinese have been coming to these areas for many years where they hold their exercises in summer time. Last year also, they had come to these areas in the garb of exercises and diverted from here towards Eastern Ladakh aggressively,” sources told ANI.
The Chinese troops are well within their traditional areas with distances at some places ranging from 100 km and beyond, they said.
Sources said the development is important as the two sides are still discussing issues related to existing friction points including hot springs and Gogra heights after the mutual withdrawal of troops from the Pangong lake area by both sides.
The Indian side has also seen summer deployment of troops at forward locations in eastern Ladakh and other sectors.
Senior officials from the forces deployed on the front have also reviewed security situation in forward areas recently and are keeping a close watch on the situation there, the sources said.
The forces deployed by the Indian side in Ladakh include the Indo Tibetan Border Police, Indian Air Force, and Indian Army which is now at the forward most locations in the sector.
The Chinese after diverting from their traditional exercise areas had come to the eastern front and the two sides have been engaged in a military standoff since then.
There was hope that the Chinese would go back to their original locations but they have remained at forward locations since then.
The Chinese have also been seen doing construction of bunkers in their territory and have been working to fortify their structures, the sources said.
India has also fortified its positions and prepared its troops for a long haul there as deployments of additional forces and rotations have been going on. Both Indian and Chinese Armies have a large number of troops deployed at the border since last year.
The formations of Mathura-based One Strike Corps have also been reoriented towards the Northern borders while one of its Armoured formations would continue to be with it. The deployment of formations and troops in the Sugar sector, Central sector, and the north-eastern borders have also been strengthened.
Due to the Indian tactical operations along the southern bank of Pangong Tso, the Indian Army managed to secure disengagement from the Finger area, the two sides are continuing to hold talks for further disengagement and de-escalation from other friction points in the area.
India is demanding disengagement at the Gogra, Hot Springs, and Depsang plains area by the Chinese Army. The Chinese have been maintaining the presence of their long-range air defence batteries including the HQ-9 which can hit targets at over 200 km ever since the stand-off started along with their fighter nets at Hotan, Ngari Gunsa and Kashgar.
India has also ensured that its guard remains up in view of the Chinese posturing and maintained a large number of troops in these areas along with frequent deployment of frontline aircraft such as the Rafale fighter jets there.


DON’T OVERDO LEASING OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT

When equipment is procured or leased, it is subordinate to the MoD’s overstretched budget due to shrinking outlays and large liability payments for previously acquired materiel. Hence, unbridled equipment leasing will pressure the services’ shrinking capital budgets and impact their revenue budgets which will have to bear the cost of maintaining the leased equipment
by Amit Cowshish and Rahul Bedi
Beset by a continuing financial crunch, India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and its armed forces have seized upon leasing an assortment of badly needed platforms and equipment from abroad to mitigate enduring operational gaps.
Hyped as an ‘innovative’ alterative, leasing was introduced as yet another procurement category in the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020 (DAP-2020) launched last October.
The DAP-2020 claims that leasing military equipment was ‘advantageous’ as it enabled the armed forces to swiftly acquire assets without incurring large capital expenditure and other administrative costs, besides allaying obsolescence handicaps.
Consequently, all three services had initiated a flood of inquiries and negotiations to lease varied platforms like naval utility helicopters (NUHs), mid-air refuelers, basic training aircraft, minesweepers and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), among other kit.
But in their keenness to haphazardly pursue this unexplored leasing option, the MoD, military, defence analysts and media appear to have disregarded that lease rent and other associated costs have to be disbursed from the existing stressed budget outlay. Besides lease rent payable to potential lessors over pre-determined intervals, the high cost of modifying platforms or equipment to meet the military’s operational requirements and insuring them too would have to be borne by the respective services from their annually shrinking outlays. As, of course, would the eventual cost of rendering the equipment, upon its lease expiry to its original state in keeping with the accepted standard international practice.
Maintaining the equipment to standards stipulated by the lessor too would be the respective services’ responsibility, unless otherwise specified. This cost could even be higher if the equipment were to be serviced and maintained by the lessor as such an eventuality would entail stationing an upkeep crew in India for extended periods.
Principally, however, whenever equipment is procured or leased, it is subordinate to the MoD’s already overstretched budget due to shrinking outlays and large committed liability payments for previously acquired materiel.
Hence, unbridled equipment leasing by the services will not only pressure their shrinking capital budgets but also impact their revenue budgets which will have to bear the expense of maintaining the leased equipment.
In short, the leasing of materiel sounds appealing, but indiscriminate renting, given the MoD’s penurious financial milieu, would be problematic. In the fiscal year 2020-21, for instance, the MoD was allocated Rs 1,24,203 crore towards capital expenditure for all three services against the Rs 2,01,286 crore which they had demanded. Even for operating revenue expenditure, the allocation was Rs 48,298 crore less than what was claimed. This, in turn, led to the Parliamentary Defence Committee cautioning the MoD against the embarrassing possibility of it defaulting on its committed liability payments, as it could reflect on India’s solvency in the global arms bazaar.
On a lighter note, one analyst remarked that the MoD’s prevailing adverse fiscal situation could end up mirroring the dilemma of an indigent, but indulgent, British aristocrat. In his unplanned and financially profligate existence, this worthy had once expansively declared that since he had no money to pay his tailor, he would simply order another suit. In all likelihood, such reasoning would find no takers in the cutthroat armament marketplace.
Meanwhile, the Indian Navy — presently operating INS Chakra, its second nuclear-powered attack submarine leased from Moscow and with a replacement boat similarly agreed upon — is the first of the three services to have fast-tracked leasing. Late last year, it had leased two non-weaponised Medium-Altitude Long-Endurance (MALE) MQ-9B Sea Guardian UAVs from the US to monitor for one year. These UAVs have been operating from INS Rajali in Tamil Nadu, but their leasing terms remain classified.
And, last month, the Navy had invited responses from overseas vendors by June 18 regarding its planned five-year lease of 24 NUHs and related support equipment to replace its fleet of legacy licence-built Chetak helicopters, inducted into service since the 1960s.
The Navy’s April 15 Request for Information to original equipment manufacturers, authorised leasing firms and government-sponsored export agencies stated that five-ton rotorcraft were needed to execute search and rescue and medical evacuation missions from ships at sea and to perform communication tasks and low-intensity maritime operations by day and night. The proposed helicopters — to be delivered to the IN within two years of the contract being signed — would need to have a residual service life of 15 years at the commencement of the lease. The lessor would also be responsible for training the rotorcraft’s air and technical crew in keeping with the delivery schedule.
The MoD is also in advanced negotiations with the French Government to lease one Airbus Defence and Space A330 multi-role tanker transport aircraft for the Indian Air Force (IAF) for training purposes. The proposed tanker that would be operated by the IAF, but maintained by the French Air Force, would in all likelihood be succeeded by leasing five more A330s to augment the reach and, hence, combat capability of the force’s combat aircraft.
The A330s have been under consideration after these tankers, operated by the French and UAE air forces, had refuelled 21 Dassault Rafale multi-role fighters to India from France since July 2020. The IAF’s remaining 15 Rafales will also be similarly refuelled by the A330s. The IAF is also considering leasing 20 basic trainer aircraft to make up for the existing shortages.
In January, the Indian Army (IA) leased four Israel Aerospace Industries MALE UAVs in response to the continuing face-off with China’s People’s Liberation Army that began last May. Proposals for additional equipment for the IA are anticipated.
In conclusion, while there is no argument regarding critical equipment voids in the military or about selectively filling them via leasing of equipment, opting indiscriminately for this conduit will adversely impact the MoD’s already pressured kitty. Fiscal and force planning remain critical.


Gaping holes in Israel’s ability to crush Hamas

The New York Times (May 13, 2021) reported that Israel believes that Hamas has about “30,000 rockets and mortar projectiles stashed in Gaza”. The question is why is Israel not able to detect where Hamas stores such rockets? Is it not better to bomb those targets instead of causing civilian deaths?

Gaping holes in Israel’s ability to crush Hamas

Innocent suffering: The present Israeli- Palestinian clash has claimed 130 lives, mostly civilians. Reuters

Vappala Balachandran

Ex-Special Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat

The present Israeli-Palestinian war was anticipated in April 2015 by Moshe Ma’oz, a leading Israeli academic, in a Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung paper. The clash so far has claimed 130 lives, mostly civilians on the fifth day (122 Palestinians, including 31 children and eight Israelis).

Yet, leading powers like the US and Germany are only speaking about the “Israeli right for self-defence”. Only the United Nations and the global media are highlighting the war’s disastrous effects on Palestinian children.

Additionally, serious communal riots have broken out within Israel due to the factors mentioned by Ma’oz, Professor of Islamic and Middle Eastern studies, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. He had warned of the possibility of serious clashes between Jews and Palestinians on the issues connected with the Temple Mount/Al-Haram Al-Sharif (Al Aqsa) and the East Jerusalem/Al-Quds Al-Sharif. He had feared that this would spiral out of control, far beyond East Jerusalem.https://26b01b080003c4722a882087f6ae42fe.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

For this, he had blamed right wing leaders, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, for flagging emotive issues like the Jewish sanctity of the Temple Mount for political reasons and on the inability of Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas in controlling the fears of his people on the alleged Jewish intentions to destroy the holy Al-Aqsa mosque.

Ma’oz had said that the Zionist-Jewish campaign which began in the late 19th century had also included purchasing Arab lands in Palestine and thus, indirectly, evicting Arab peasants. This trend was exploited by Hajj Amin Al-Husayni, the grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who was the first to allege that the Jews were conspiring to destroy the Temple Mount mosques and rebuild their ancient Solomon temple of 957 BCE.

All these factors had vitiated the atmosphere and had led to the 1929 riots which started at the Western Wall and spread throughout Palestine, killing more than 300 people. On the other hand, moderate voices in both communities wanted only peaceful coexistence. Moderate Jews only demanded to control the Western Wall as a historical national symbol.

The 1936-37 “Palestine Royal Commission”, led by Lord William Robert Peel, grandson of the legendary creator of “Bobbies” had recommended that Palestine should be divided into three areas: one for Arabs, another for Jews and a neutral territory, including Jerusalem, under British control as “holy territories” for the three religions.https://26b01b080003c4722a882087f6ae42fe.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

The United Nations Resolution 181 passed by the UN General Assembly in 1947, which was accepted by the Jewish leadership followed this principle of dividing Palestine into three areas: Arab and Jewish states and the city of Jerusalem declared as a corpus separatum (Latin for “separate entity”) to be governed by a special international regime. The UN map shows these three areas in different colours.

In 1948, Jordan captured the eastern portion of the city of Muslim Jerusalem during the Arab-Israeli War. Under the Jordanian regime, Jews were barred from entering the Old City till June 10, 1967 when Gen Yitzhak Rabin (later Prime Minister) captured it during the Six-Day War, allowing Israel’s control of the Al-Aqsa compound.

There are three immediate reasons for the present crisis: It started with daily clashes for nearly a month between the Israeli police and Ramzan worshippers while controlling some of Palestinian gatherings outside Al-Aqsa. Unfortunately, this coincided with the efforts of Zionist “nationalists” to celebrate “Yom Yerushalayim” (Jerusalem Day) on May 9-10 when East Jerusalem was captured by Israel in 1967.

Another reason was the recent ruling by a Jerusalem district court evicting several Palestinian families living for years in the Sheik Jarrah neighbourhood of East Jerusalem which were claimed to have been purchased originally by the Jews before 1947. The matter is now before the Supreme Court which has delayed hearing that case. This has severely agitated the Palestinians who feel that the Jews are now evicting Muslims even from East Jerusalem.https://26b01b080003c4722a882087f6ae42fe.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

Hamas elevated the tension from May 10 onwards through rocket attacks on Israel in support of the 300 Arabs who were alleged to have been injured during clashes with Israeli police and right-wing “nationalists” outside Al-Aqsa.

The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) responded by missile attacks on pinpointed targets claimed to be Hamas military and intelligence centres. The IDF has now massed ground troops for action if necessary.

Israel had tried the same strategy in 2009 and 2014, but failed. The Guardian (UK) said that Hamas had fired 8,500 rockets into Israel in 2009 and Israel retaliated with an air strike every 20 minutes. During the 2014 war, Hamas fired 4,000 rockets into Israel. On both occasions, Israel could not locate where the Hamas had stored its rockets. Instead, they bombed apartment complexes and police stations.

The New York Times (May 13, 2021) reported that Israel believes that Hamas has about “30,000 rockets and mortar projectiles stashed in Gaza.” The question is why is Israel not able to detect where Hamas stores such rockets? Is it not better to bomb those targets instead of causing civilian deaths?

There are many reasons for this, including misjudgement and capability. On January 1, 2009, famous pianist-conductor Daniel Barenboim wrote an Op-ed piece in The Guardian (UK) that Israel had encouraged Hamas to weaken Yasser Arafat. Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman confirms this by quoting former Chief of AMAN (military intelligence) Amnon Lipkin-Shahak: “In a certain sense, the Shin Bet grew the jihadist.”

In 2011, Prime Minister Netanyahu was forced to order the humiliating “Gilad Shalit” exchange in which a lone Israeli soldier, kept hostage by Hamas since 2006, was exchanged for 1,027 Hamas prisoners. This was because Israeli intelligence agencies, despite their legendary technical prowess, could not locate Shalit, although Gaza is only 365 square kilometre in area (one-fourth of Delhi’s area).

Bergman quotes another instance of 1992 how a wrong decision by the IDF chief Ehud Barak (later Prime Minister) to clandestinely expel top 200 Hamas operatives to Lebanon in December 1992 had paved the way for Hamas getting closer to Shia extremist group Hezbollah and then to Iran for rocket technology.

These examples would indicate gaping holes in Israeli capability of vanquishing a diehard enemy like Hamas. As a result, innocent civilians are suffering. 


Israel-Hamas violence fuelled by emotive triggers

Israel will have to introspect. Its hard-line, extreme-right approach is pulling it into a black hole. The prospects of Hamas East and West, Hezbollah to the North and restive Palestinians within the country do not bode well for the long-term security and prosperity of its populace. When asymmetric entities engage in conflict, outcomes are unpredictable. Rocket salvo attacks by Hamas have broken through the Israeli Iron Dome, challenging its invincibility.

Israel-Hamas violence fuelled by emotive triggers

Conflict: This time, in an ominous departure, the Arab population within Israel has raised its hand. Reuters

Lt Gen Sanjiv Langer (retd)

Former Deputy Chief, Defence Staff

Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdsmen and thy herdsmen; for we be brethren. — Abraham, Old Testament

RAMZAN’S Laylat al Qadr, the Night of Destiny, catapulted Israel and Palestine to a crescendo of violence. With more than 200 killed in Gaza and at least 10 in Israel, the battle has entered its second week. Hamas, having fired about 3,000 rockets in salvos, and relentless Israeli air, land and sea bombardments on hundreds of targets are edging the protagonists towards an expanded conflict.

The combat comes at a time when Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas are both in political quicksand. Netanyahu may gain a lifeline as his opponent Yair Lapid is unable to engineer support. President Abbas will, however, sink deeper, ceding vital space to Hamas. Al Fatah and Hamas took birth in the Palestinian Intifada of 1987. While Fatah and Arafat took centre stage in the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), Hamas unrelenting, fundamentally divergent, bided its time. Post elections in 2006, Hamas expelled Fatah from the Gaza Strip, resulting in a fractured Palestinian Authority: Hamas in Gaza and Fatah in Palestine territories, to the East of Israel.

The conflict between Hamas and Israel is endemic, manifesting itself in the wars of 2009 and 2014. The present firestorm was preceded by a slow but definite burn. Stoking the fires of Palestinian resentment have been the US-supported declarations on Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and the ill-conceived Trump ‘Deal of the Century — Peace Plan’.

The night of May 8 was nestled in an unfortunate convergence of emotive triggers: Heavy Israeli hand in crowd management for Ramzan; Israeli celebrations of their 1967 victory and capture of East Jerusalem; and Israeli Court permitting the eviction of four Palestinian families from Sheikh Jarrah (suburb of Jerusalem) for Jewish settlers.

Consequently, this time, in an ominous departure, the Arab population within Israel has raised its hand. This explains the violence in the areas of Bat Yam, Lod, Sheikh Jarrah and the West Bank. While the move for eviction impacts 700 Palestinian families, the court order is seen as a precedent. The incendiary role and active precipitation by Hamas is, however, writ large in the fire. Hamas repeatedly threatened violence, treating Israeli actions in the vicinity of the Al-Aqsa Mosque as a Red Line.

Hamas, equipped by Iran, modelling itself on the Lebanese Hezbollah, seeks supremacy in the Palestinian affairs. Its mass appeal is enhanced by its ability to confront the Israeli forces and take casualties. Civilian deaths are an unfortunate but necessary consequence of ‘The Struggle’. Violence works to its political advantage and diminishes the political signature of Fatah.

Israel faces tough choices. Standoff attacks have a limited deterrence since Hamas cadres welcome death. Hamas has embedded its facilities deep into the civilian habitation. Enormous casualties are on show. The present targeting by Israel of the HQ, leaders and military facilities orchestrates casualties. Israeli polity is in turmoil. Sections of the resident 21 per cent Palestinian population are inflamed. They have challenges on both sides of the border. The Gaza Strip is one of the densest urban entities in the world. Concrete rises and spreads with little gaps. It is a nightmare for the land forces. Past land interventions have caused high casualties and had had no enduring gains.

The Indian response has been nuanced. With a history of support to the Palestinian cause, a multi-dimensional robust, flourishing relationship with Israel since 1992, this is mandated. While Israeli centrality is unambiguous, India is autonomous on the larger issues. This has been echoed in the response of TS Tirumurti, Ambassador of India to the UN: deep concern over all clashes and violence, with specific reference to Hamas rocket attacks and violence on Temple Mount; concern over evictions in Sheikh Jarrah; insistence on maintaining status quo; adherence to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which stigmatises Israeli settlements, calls them flagrant violations; and commitment to the Two-State Solution.

While India has stayed its hand on Hamas in the UN, the present specific reference to its rocket attacks is also due to the fact that Hamas initiated the violence as an act of war.

Historic Indian commitment to the region also included a large presence in the UN Mission, UNEF I from 1956 to 1967. The mission had illustrious Indian Force Commanders — Generals PS Gyani and Inderjit Rikhye. While the mission was largely deployed in Gaza, Indians were a welcome presence in the region, as they continue to be today, in the UN Mission UNIFIL, Lebanon.

It also bears mention that India’s support to the Palestinians has been unfailing and since 2018, the Indian contribution to them has been quadrupled to $5 million a year. The assistance has been sharpened with project-based interventions. Indian outreach is both in Gaza and the Eastern Palestinian territories.

Hamas military spokesman Abu Ubaida has threatened: “…we have prepared for your kind of deaths that would make you curse yourselves…” Hamas may have chosen the moment well, but the Israelis will not oblige it. Israeli institutions are strong, their crisis response is outstanding and defence and security capabilities have a wide spectrum and bleeding edge.

Hamas, undoubtedly, has an eye on the impending Palestinian elections, which President Abbas has postponed. This conflagration will possibly give electoral margins to Hamas for realising its dream of control over all territories.

Israel will have to introspect. Its hard-line, extreme-right approach is pulling it into a black hole. The prospects of Hamas East and West, Hezbollah to the North and restive Palestinians within the country do not bode well for the long-term security and prosperity of its populace.

When asymmetric entities engage in conflict, outcomes are unpredictable. Rocket salvo attacks by Hamas have broken through the Israeli Iron Dome, challenging its invincibility. There is a blurring of focus for Israel, with the incidence of domestic violence.

Hamas is presently poised for political gains. Israeli military superiority will not transcend to assuage damaged psyche and heal emotional wounds. Hamas is on track, while Israel will have to review its existential challenges. We must pray for the innocent victims. We must also, in time, assist them to pick up the threads of their lives.