Sanjha Morcha

India keeps all options open as China decries ‘trespass’ in fresh warning

DOKLAM Diplomatic efforts are on, parliamentary panel told even as Beijing hardens its stance

NEWDELHI/BEIJING: China has been unusually aggressive in the standoff with India near the Sikkim border, but the two sides are trying to find a solution through diplomatic channels, the government said on Tuesday, hours after Beijing issued a fresh warning to New Delhi.

Indian and Chinese troops have been locked in a face-off in the Donglang or Doklam region at the tri-junction of the boundaries of India, Bhutan and China since June 16. India has said its troops acted in coordination with the Bhutan government to oppose the construction of a road by Chinese troops in the region.

On Tuesday, foreign secretary S Jaishankar briefed the parliamentary standing committee on external affairs headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor. The panel’s members, including Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, posed a series of questions to him pertaining to the dispute.

The foreign secretary referred to the issue as a “standoff” and an “incident”, playing down what he said was ‘media hype’, according to sources who were part of the meeting. While admitting that Beijing was more aggressive than it usually is in such incidents, the top diplomat told the MPs that two countries have put in place mechanisms such as flag meetings and special representative meetings to address issues along the border.

“He explained to the members that India has an understanding with Bhutan which was the reason why the Indian army got involved in the India-Bhutan-Tibet tri-junction in the Sikkim sector after its help was sought when Chinese troops were found building a road in the tri-junction,” a committee member said, requesting anonymity because of the confidential nature of the meeting. Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi asked if the recent face-off was a Chinese tactic to send a message that India would not be able to fulfil its obligations to Bhutan. The foreign secretary, sources said, responded by saying that India factors in “sensitivities” of Bhutan and Thimphu had lodged a diplomatic protest with China.

Gandhi also wanted to know why India’s traditional friends such as Iran are not making supportive statements on Kashmir, another member said. Similar concerns were raised by others members, which included CPI(M) leader Md Salim and TMC’s Sugata Bose.


SC rejects Army appeal against promotion of Major General

The ban on Dalbir Singh was imposed by former army chief and currently a minister of state, V K Singh, during the former’s tenure as 3 Corps commander in Dimapur.
WRITTEN BY PRANAV KULKARNI | NEW DELHI | Published On: September 2, 2015 3:33
AM
Army Chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag (Source: PTI)
In a setback to Army Chief General Dalbir Singh, the Supreme Court has turned down an appeal by the Army against an order to consider promoting a Major General who had held a key position when a disciplinary ban was imposed on Dalbir Singh in 2012.
The ban, imposed by then Army Chief V K Singh, was later revoked by his successor Bikram Singh.
When the ban was imposed, Karun Kumar Sinha was the Major General (General Staff) of Eastern Command, and facilitated communication of such notices to Dalbir Singh.
After notice,Army Chief puts key Lt Gen’s promotion on hold A bench of Justices J S Khehar and Adarsh K Goel found no merit in the appeal filed by the Ministry of Defence, challenging an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) in April this year in favour of Sinha.
In a recent order, the court refused to admit the Army’s appeal against the AFT’s decision and ordered that “compliance (with the tribunal’s order) shall be ensured under all circumstances” by September 15.
The tribunal, while quashing the adverse comments made in Sinha’s ACR by General Dalbir Singh and his predecessor Bikram Singh, had directed the Army to convene a special board to re-consider Sinha’s case for promotion to the rank of Lt General.
The AFT had noted that downgrading the ACR was not only “vitiated by malice in law” but the assessment of Sinha’s performance was also “subjective, inconsistent and not at all justified” since the officer was conferred the Vishist Seva Medal for his duties during the same period between October 2012 and June 2013.
It gave the Army and MoD three months to convene the promotion board and complete the exercise in view of Sinha’s scheduled retirement on October 31.
The ban on Dalbir Singh was imposed by former army chief and currently a minister of state,V K Singh, during the former’s tenure as 3 Corps commander in Dimapur, citing an operation by an intelligence unit under his command.
Sinha’s petition said that immediately after retirement of V K Singh, following which Bikram Singh took over as Army Chief and then Lt Gen Dalbir Singh took over as the Eastern Army Commander, his ACR was downgraded by the two in their capacity as reviewers.
Aggrieved by the AFT’s decision and strictures, the Army and MoD had appealed in the top court, claiming Sinha was not considered for promotion due to his overall performance, relative merit and comparative evaluation. Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, who appeared for the Army and MoD, sought to rebut the charges of bias and subjectivity, saying Sinha’s ACR was adjudged objectively and in terms of the policy.
The bench, however, remained unimpressed with his arguments and said that the AFT decision was well reasoned.

Doklam standoff: Indian Air Force chief says ready for any eventuality

Image for representation

As India explores diplomatic options to resolve the stand-off between Indian and Chinese troops in the Doklam plateau in Bhutan, the Indian Air Force is ready for any eventuality.

Chief of Indian Air Force Air Chief Marshal B S Dhanoa in an exclusive interview to Indian Today said, “We are ready for any eventuality. The stand-off on the ground continues, diplomatic options are being explored”.

Indian and Chinese troops are engaged in a face-off since June 6 when Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) moved into Doklam Plateau – claimed by both Bhutan and China – demolished bunkers and took away Bhutanese soldiers at gunpoint. India is treaty bound to help Bhutan. The Indian Army moved into Doklam to stop the Chinese from building a road through the disputed area.

Although short on fighters the Indian Air Force is prepared for a “full spectrum” – or a two-front war. “For a full-spectrum war we need a certain number of squadrons which we don’t have immediately.  The government,” he said is “aware of the shortage.”

India has recently bought fighter aircrafts from France and the shortfall is likely to be made up soon, he said. “There has never been a two-front war,” Air Chief Marshal BS Dhanoa said and added the point to ponder is whether the world will allow Pakistan to fight along with China and “world will permit it.

Air Chief Marshal Dhanoa was speaking to India Today to mark the 18th anniversary of Kargil war. The Kargil war – between India and Pakistan – came to end today in 1999. Then commanding a fighter squadron, Air Chief Marshal Dhanoa flew several missions along the Line of Control – the de-facto border between India and Pakistan – destroying Pakistani ammunition dumps and strongholds.

Remembering the Kargil operations, the Air Chief said: “My worst moment was when Squadron Leader Ahuja was killed. Squadron leader Ahuja – who was bomb damage reconnaissance mission – was captured alive and shot dead by Pakistani forces when he ejected after being hit by a missile”.

The IAF could have “knocked off” the Pakistani supply lines and neutralised the Pakistani artillery that was firing into India if the IAF was allowed to cross the LoC during the Kargil war, Air Chief Marhsal B S Dhanoa said.

He was, however, quick to add that “every war is fought to achieve a political motive. The political objective then was to throw out the Pakistani soldiers who had crossed into India. That political objective was achieved”.

Besides, Pakistan was shown as belligerent country. Globally, India was able to take “moral high ground,” he told India Today.


Pak: Considering visa request of Jadhav’s mother

Pak: Considering visa request of Jadhav’s mother
Kulbhushan Jadhav. — File photo

Islamabad, July 13

Pakistan today said it was considering a visa application of Kulbhushan Jadhav’s mother to meet her son, sentenced to death by a military court.External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj had two days back said she had written a “personal letter” to Adviser to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz asking for approval of Avantika’s visa.She also said that Aziz did not even respond to her letter.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)A Pakistan foreign office official said asking for recommendations from Aziz to grant visas was against “diplomatic norms”.Jadhav, 46, was sentenced to death by a Pakistani military tribunal in April on charges of espionage and terrorism. India maintains he was kidnapped from Iran. — PTI


Kargil war: When an IAF Jaguar had Sharif, Musharraf in its crosshairs

In a report titled ‘War no solution to problems, says Nawaz’, the Pakistani newspaper The News, said in its edition of June 25, 1999: “Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif on Thursday reiterated his call for dialogue with India for defusing a war-like situation along the Line of Control (LoC).

 

Pervez Musharraf , Musharraf, Nawaz sharif, Pakistan, Pakistan prime minister, Pak PM Nawaz sharif, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, Pakistan government, world news

Around 8.45 am on Thursday, June 24, 1999, at the height of the Kargil War, an Indian Air Force Jaguar flying close to the Line of Control “lased over” — that is, acquired for bombing using its laser-guided system — a forward base of the Pakistan army. Ultimately, however, the pilot of a second Jaguar that was following close behind — who was supposed to fire the bomb — targeted it “outside the laser basket”; that is, he did not fire it at the military base.

At that precise time, Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan Army chief General Pervez Musharraf were present at the base, shows an official document accessed by The Indian Express. The events of what might have been a day of catastrophic disaster have not been made public before.

“On 24 June 1999, Jaguar CLDS [Cockpit Laser Designation System] engaged Point 4388. The pilot had lased over Gulteri across LoC but the bomb did not reach the target as it was released outside the laser basket,” says the document of the Government of India. It then notes, in bold type, that “Later, it was ascertained that the PM of Pakistan, Mr Nawaz Sharif, was present at Gulteri when the target was attacked.”

When the first Jaguar targeted Gulteri base, it was not aware that Sharif and Musharraf were present at the target. An Air Commodore, who was airborne at the same time, however, advised the pilot to not fire the bomb. The bomb was then dropped on the Indian side of the LoC.

Kargil War: When An IAF Jaguar Had Sharif, Musharraf In Its Crosshairs

Gulteri, also called Gultari, a forward administrative base of the Pakistan Army, was at the forefront of providing logistics support to Pakistani soldiers during the Kargil War. It is approximately nine kilometres inside Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) from the LoC, opposite India’’ Dras sector.

On that day, Sharif, accompanied by Musharraf, was on his first visit to forward areas along the LoC in Shakma sector. In a report titled ‘War no solution to problems, says Nawaz’, the Pakistani newspaper The News, said in its edition of June 25, 1999: “Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif on Thursday reiterated his call for dialogue with India for defusing a war-like situation along the Line of Control (LoC). “I invite the government of India to adopt the way of reconciliation,” so that all disputes including Kashmir could be solved through peaceful means, he said while addressing the troops at the height of 11,600 feet here. Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee and the Army Chief Gen Pervez Musharraf, Defence Secretary Lt Gen (Retd) Iftikhar Ali, Hummayun Akhtar, the Chairman Board of Investment, were also present on the occasion.”

Air Marshal Vinod Patney (retd), who was then the Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the IAF’s Western Air Command, and directly responsible for the air operations in the Kargil War, told The Indian Express about the incident of June 24, 1999: “It was a target in Mushkoh Valley, where a logistics dump was seen by the Jaguar aircraft. The first Jaguar lased against the target and the second Jaguar was to fire a laser-guided bomb. When the captain of the lasing aircraft suddenly had a doubt and told him not to fire, he came back and found from the video that it was Gulteri.”

‘Lasing the target’ happens when the laser guidance system locks on to the target, puts the crosshairs on it, and continues to keep it in the crosshairs, which is visible to the pilot on a screen in the cockpit. As the CLDS system was then fitted on trainer Jaguar aircraft which could not carry weapons, the bombing had to be done by a second Jaguar aircraft. Following at a distance of about three kilometres, the second Jaguar would pick up the laser beam from the target using the LRMTS (laser range-finder and marked-target seeker), and deliver the bomb with pinpoint accuracy.

Air Marshal Patney clarified that “I was neither informed nor aware” about Sharif’s presence at Gulteri. In any case, “hitting Gulteri was against the rules”, said the Air Marshal, who is now director general of the Centre for Air Power Studies (CAPS) in New Delhi.

The government of Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had chosen to restrict operations to India’s side of the LoC, and denied the IAF permission to cross the Line while executing missions. Air Marshal Patney’s Air-1 (a senior staff officer) in HQ Western Air Command then, Air Marshal A K Singh (retd), a Jaguar pilot, was airborne in that area during the same time, and was in communication with the pilot of the leading aircraft when this incident occurred. Air Marshal Singh, who was an Air Commodore during the Kargil War, retired as AOC-in-C of the Western Air Command a decade ago, and now leads a retired life in Delhi.

“The time was around 8.45 am. I was also airborne that day in the same area in a Jaguar aircraft, which I had flown from Adampur air base. The flight commander of the leading Jaguar was a Squadron Leader who was my youngster when I had commanded the squadron,” Air Marshal Singh told The Indian Express.

According to Air Marshal Singh, “The flight commander excitedly called me on the radio and said, ‘I have the target in sight. It is a big military camp with a large number of people. I have it on the CLDS.’ I told him not to fire and to tell me whether he was on this side of the river or the other side.”

The flight commander of the first aircraft had lased on to Gulteri while Sharif and Musharraf were there, and the second aircraft was ready to fire the bomb when Air Marshal Singh told them not to fire. The second Jaguar then fired the bomb in Mushkoh Valley on the Indian side of the LoC.

“I was very sure that he was across the LoC as I had overflown that area earlier myself. I also knew the flight commander personally who was excitable and known for his impetuousness. As it was on a riverbank and with a large number of people, the base could only be Gulteri,” Air Marshal Singh said.

“I then told the flight commander, ‘let me fix the position’. It means that my aircraft had to come to a position where I could physically see his aircraft. When I did that, I saw that he was 10-12 kilometres to my right, clearly in Pakistani territory,” said Air Marshal Singh. But Air Marshal Singh refused to fully blame the pilot, ascribing it to “the aircraft equipment which was so inaccurate in terms of border marking and the maps; and where you were, you could not be sure.”

When Air Marshal Singh and the flight commander returned to base and saw the video recorded by CLDS, it was confirmed that the target lased by the Jaguar was indeed Gulteri. The large number of men seen at the post in the video were listening to the speech being delivered by Sharif.

Was it pure luck that a disaster was averted? “It was purely coincidental that I was airborne at that time,” Air Marshal Singh said. “Else, once a pilot is in the air, acquires a target and confirms it, he has orders to bomb it.” In this case, the target of the bombs would have included Nawaz Sharif and Pervez Musharraf, in the middle of a war between two nuclear-armed neighbours.

When contacted by The Indian Express, the IAF spokesperson said, “The IAF would not like to comment on any operational details.”

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App


Ex-soldier working as priest killed

Abohar, July 10

An ex-serviceman, who had been working as priest in Hanuman Mandir near the bus stand in Nagrana village in Hanumangarh, was found killed on Sunday.Preliminary investigation indicated that Surmukh Singh, formerly of the Sikh Regiment and native of Manupur village of Samrala sub-division in Ludhiana district, had deserted the Army following the 1984 riots. After court-martial proceedings, his services were terminated.In 1995, he took over as priest at the Hanuman Mandir and was known as Pujari Somgiri. Yesterday, three youths found his blood-stained body on a bed in the open at the temple complex and informed the police. His mobile phone was missing. When a constable dialled his phone number, a person responded and confessed to having killed the priest. He said that 20 persons, including the priest, were witness to his accident in 2012, but none helped him.“I have decided to kill all of them,” the man reportedly warned. — OC


Sikkim standoff: Army ready for long haul in Doka La Soldiers pitch tents, stock up supplies

Sikkim standoff: Army ready for long haul in Doka La
A Chinese soldier (L) next to an Indian soldier at the Nathu La border crossing between the two countries in Sikkim. — AFP file

New Delhi, July 9

The Indian Army is ready for a long haul in holding onto its position in Dokalam area near the Bhutan tri-junction, notwithstanding China ratcheting up rhetoric against India demanding pulling back of its troops.

The Indian soldiers deployed in the disputed area have pitched tents, in an indication that they are unlikely to retreat unless there was reciprocity from China’s PLA personnel in ending the face-off at an altitude of around 10,000 feet in the Sikkim section.

A steady line of supplies is being maintained for the soldiers at the site, official sources said, signalling that the Indian Army is not going to wilt under any pressure from China.

At the same time they sounded confident of finding a diplomatic solution to the dispute, citing resolution of border skirmishes in the past through diplomacy.

Read: India pushes troops in Doka La

Chinese envoy terms situation ‘grave’, rules out compromiseChina issues safety advisory for its citizens in India

Though China has been aggressively asserting that it was not ready for any “compromise” and that the “ball is in India’s court”, the view in the security establishment here is that there cannot be any unilateral approach in defusing the tension.

Both the countries had agreed to a mechanism in 2012 to resolve border flare ups through consultations at various levels.

The mechanism has not worked so far in the current case as the standoff near the Bhutan tri-junction, triggered by China’s attempt to build a road in the strategically important area, has dragged on for over three weeks.

New Delhi has already conveyed to China that such an action would represent a significant change of status quo with “serious” security implications for India. The road link could give China a major military advantage over India.

Doka La is the Indian name for the region which Bhutan recognises as Dokalam, while China claims it as part of its Donglang region.

China and Bhutan are engaged in talks over the resolution of the dispute in the area. India argues that since it is a tri-junction involving the three countries, it also has a say in the issue, especially in the backdrop of 2012 agreement between special representatives of the two countries, that have till now held 19 rounds of talks.

Bhutan has no diplomatic ties with China. As a close friend and neighbour, Bhutan enjoys diplomatic and military support from India.

Of the 3,488-km-long India-China border from Jammu and Kashmir to Arunachal Pradesh, a 220-km section falls in Sikkim. PTI


Northern Command chief reviews security

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, July 7

With Kashmir on alert ahead of Hizbul Mujahideen militant Burhan Wani’s death anniversary, Northern Command chief Lt Gen D Anbu reviewed security situation in the Valley today.The Northern Command chief along with Chinar Corps Commander Lt Gen JS Sandhu also called on Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti and discussed the prevailing security situation in the Valley with her, an Army spokesman said.Lt General D Anbu also visited the areas in north and south Kashmir and reviewed the overall security.“During his visit, he reviewed the security situation and measures put in place for ensuring peace and calm in the region,” the spokesman said.The Army commander interacted with the troops on ground and complimented them for their dedication and displaying highest standards of professionalism, the spokesman said.Security forces have been put on alert ahead of Burhan’s death anniversary. Security forces have taken all necessary preventive measures to ensure peace.The Army, the police and the CRPF are working in close coordination to meet any security challenge. While the police and the CRPF are deployed in strength to handle law and order situation, the Army is maintaining area domination in rural areas. There are inputs about possible militant attacks in the coming days and security around the sensitive installation has been enhanced.


Army jawan in J-K deserts unit, alert sounded

Army jawan in J-K deserts unit, alert sounded
Zahoor Ahmed Tokar

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, July 6

A Kashmiri Army man deserted his unit in north Kashmir and fled  with arms and ammunition on the intervening night of Tuesday and Wednesday.While there is no confirmation whether the jawan, hailing from Sirnoo village in volatile Pulwama district of south Kashmir, has joined militancy, an alert has been sounded. There have been instances in J&K where policemen have joined the militant ranks, but this is the first incident when a Kashmiri soldier has deserted the Army ranks.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Sepoy Zahoor Ahmed Tokar was posted in 173 Territorial Army (Engineering) at Gantmulla Baramulla. He went missing, along with an AK rifle and three magazines. He had been posted at the Gantmulla base since he joined the Army two years ago. Major General AK Singh of the Army’s counter-insurgency unit Kilo Force said the desertion by the jawan was a “one-off incident.”Tokar had visited his home for Eid and joined back after two days. A police officer said, “There is no active militant from Tokar’s village though a few militants are active in the neighbouring villages.” Zahoor Ahmed Tokar Majid Jahangir Tribune News Service Srinagar, July 6 A Kashmiri Army man deserted his unit in north Kashmir and fled  with arms and ammunition on the intervening night of Tuesday and Wednesday. While there is no confirmation whether the jawan, hailing from Sirnoo village in volatile Pulwama district of south Kashmir, has joined militancy, an alert has been sounded. There have been instances in J&K where policemen have joined the militant ranks, but this is the first incident when a Kashmiri soldier has deserted the Army ranks. (Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd) Sepoy Zahoor Ahmed Tokar was posted in 173 Territorial Army (Engineering) at Gantmulla Baramulla. He went missing, along with an AK rifle and three magazines. He had been posted at the Gantmulla base since he joined the Army two years ago.  Major General AK Singh of the Army’s counter-insurgency unit Kilo Force said the desertion by the jawan was a “one-off incident.” Tokar had visited his home for Eid and joined back after two days. A police officer said, “There is no active militant from Tokar’s village though a few militants are active in the neighbouring villages.”


Take the golden mean KC Singh

Take the golden mean
Pins & needles: China is, time and again, trying to build pressure points on India.

 THE Sino-Indian standoff in the Doklam area, near the tri-junction of the borders of Sikkim, Bhutan and China is assuming a serious dimension. The facts known so far are that on June 16 a PLA construction party entered Bhutanese territory in the Doklam area to construct a road. Bhutan lodged a protest with China that this intrusion was in violation of their agreements of 1988 and 1998. India, in coordination with the Bhutanese government, let its personnel — who were “present at general area Doka La” — help with the interception. The forces are facing-off, not eyeball to eyeball but in close proximity. These facts were revealed by India in a press note of June 30, 2017. On June 26, the Chinese ministry of foreign affairs, answering a question, asserted that because the Sikkim-China border has been delimited by historical agreements i.e. Convention between Great Britain and China Relating to Sikkim and Tibet (1890), the Indian side has “unilaterally stirred trouble”. The Chinese ministry of defence on June 29, more acerbically, called earlier statements of the Indian Army Chief as “extremely irresponsible” while alleging that “Indian border guards” had transgressed Chinese territory. The Indian side underplayed the fracas calculating that India and Bhutan unity and the terrain and deployment in the area favouring India, it was best to allow China to let off steam. The fact that PM Narendra Modi set forth on a leisurely three-day sojourn through Israel prior to the G- 20 meeting in Germany, South Block seems convinced that Chinese rhetoric will blow over. But Chinese ambassador in New Delhi re-stirred the pot calling the situation “grave”. India had to resolve the issue as, he argued, it neither had the right to interfere with China-Bhutan boundary talks nor make territorial claims on behalf of Bhutan. This may be diplomatic bluster and South Block’s unwillingness to speculate on Chinese motives justified, but the events did occur against the background of the Modi-Trump summit on June 26. It is possible that the PLA was routinely attempting to improve its position in the Doklam area as occupation of the plateau and linking it by road would provide deployment advantage. It is equally likely that the Chinese, by intruding into Bhutanese territory, were testing the weaker party of the India-Bhutan alliance to see if it could be browbeaten. Had India not aided the outnumbered Bhutanese, stopping the Chinese ingress, Bhutan would have been entitled to question Indian reliability. Furthermore, it is also possible that the Chinese simply miscalculated the salience of the Trump-Modi summit. The India-US joint statement leaves little scope for doubt that China is the unnamed threat to a rule-based international order, freedom of the seas and Asian security. Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and transactional deal with China at Mar-a-Lago may have erroneously lulled Chinese President Xi Jinping into assuming that the US was no longer willing to wager its military resources to contain China, directly like President Barack Obama or indirectly by joining ranks with “democratic stalwarts” of Asia. Having consolidated its hold on the South China Sea, China may have been looking to build pressure points on India to obtain assurances on curbing the Dalai Lama’s role or Indian objections to the OROB. Unnoticed by China something seems to have turned off Trump’s dalliance with it. It could be Chinese unwillingness or inability to curb the Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK) in its pursuit of deadlier missile and nuclear weapon capability. A successful test now of an intercontinental ballistic missile by DPRK, with the possibility of reaching the US mainland, would further embarrass Trump. His disappointment earlier emanated from the death of US student Otto Warmbier after repatriation by DPRK in a coma, the cause of which remained mysterious. While before assuming presidency Trump blamed China for DPRK behaviour, he changed that after a 10-minute chat with Chinese President Xi Jinping in April. Some Chinese reports let it be known that Xi was irritated by periodic phone calls from Trump about DPRK as Xi was hardly the desk officer for that country. Trump’s tweet on June 21, after Warmbier’s death, noted that while he appreciated “the efforts of President Xi and China to help with North Korea, it has not worked out”.It is possible that the timing of Modi’s visit worked to India’s advantage as Trump may already have been having a rethink on his China policy. The aggressive patrolling of the South China Sea by US ships partially confirms a modified US approach to China. This may again be a tactical shift to be replaced with equal alacrity by Trump-Xi hand-holding at the G-20. The moral of this story is that with a whimsical US President, India and China would be grievously erring to base border policy on his anticipated conduct. Modi and Xi are attending the G-20 summit in Germany. Xi is preceding it with a swing through Russia and a bilateral Germany visit. Modi arrives there after his three-day Israeli sojourn. If they do not meet, there would be speculation that the Chinese are upset over India stymieing them at Doklam. If they do meet, they would be compelled to address the standoff and seek a solution that allows both to keep face. Xi now finds himself between a reassertive US, just having conducted a joint missile exercise with the Republic of Korea, and a resolute India unwilling to relent on its redlines in the crucial Doklam tri-junction area that abuts India’s vital arterial link to its Eastern states. The two nationalistic leaders need an honourable way out of the crisis. Xi needs moral ascendancy approaching the crucial five-yearly party congress which will decide the leaders to rule China over the next five years and beyond. Modi cannot back-off to maintain his image as defender and protector of ‘Bharat Mata’. It is not the 1962 moment of national shame or the 1987 Operation Falcon opportunity to restore honour lost. It is certainly time for both leaders to reassess the way forward for a safer, securer Asia. But both must remember it took one bullet to trigger World War I. The writer is a former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs