Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

KARGIL VIJAY DIWAS Artillery guns form core of defence at LoC

Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, July 25

Twenty years after the Kargil conflict, the 168-km wide ‘Kargil’ frontage along the Line of Control (LoC) now has the heaviest deployment of artillery guns anywhere in India, sources in the Army said.

India’s war-time lessons have resulted in the addition of an array of artillery guns. This is backed by layered surveillance systems meshed in with the huge increase in manpower and fire capability.India has the ability to station a division of artillery guns. Some are permanently stationed, others can be sent within a few hours, a functionary said, narrating what has changed in 20 years.

Artillery guns played a major role in the Kargil war. Lt Gen VK Narula (retd), former Director General Artillery, says: “Artillery guns can neutralise the enemy positions allowing the ground forces much easier access. This is what exactly happened in Kargil. The guns had pulverised the enemy at all Pakistani positions other than those behind the mountains.”Nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan had fought the war in May-July 1999 along the 168-km Himalayan ridgeline that forms the Mushkoh-Drass-Kargil-Batalik-Turtuk axis of the LoC. An internal study within the Army points to how future wars could be different, asymmetric and dominated by the use of cyber and space assets.

At a national seminar in Mid-July “20 years after Kargil conflict”, Army Chief General Bipin Rawat spoke of two issues — changing character of warfare and transformation of forces. “In these 20 years, character of warfare and its conduct has changed. Cyber and space have changed the dynamics and both will be fiercely contested,” he said.

Another change for India is the ability of surveillance. The existing layers include UAVs, long range sights that look as far as 25 km, and thermal imagers. During winter, aerial sorties are carried out with high resolution cameras that provide live feed into control rooms. Twenty years ago, the IAF had just Mirage-2000 jets that filmed things in black and white. The tape had to be carried back to the operations room to be studied.

The next addition in this surveillance layer will be ‘quad-copters’ (small drones) and tactical UAVs. Since 1999, the Army has not vacated any posts in those icy heights. Its manpower for the 196-km frontage was a mere ‘3,000’ troops, but now it stands at 12,000 with the ability to airlift acclimatised troops within hours.


10 Things To Know About Updating Details In Aadhaar Card

If the user has Aadhaar registered mobile number, he/she can also check the Aadhaar update history.

10 Things To Know About Updating Details In Aadhaar Card

The UIDAI or Unique Identification Authority of India, the issuer of 12-digit personal identification numbers under the Aadhaar scheme, offers a variety of services online. Through its “self-service portal”, the UIDAI enables users to update address, verify Aadhaar number (UID), email address or mobile number registered with Aadhaar, and lock or unlock the biometrics information associated with Aadhaar, among other facilities. While the address can be updated online using the UIDAI portal, for change in any other details, one needs to visit an “Aadhaar Kendra” (Aadhaar centre).
Here are 10 things to know about updating details in Aadhaar card:
  1. UIDAI enables Aadhaar holders to make changes to the address fed into its database using an OTP- or one-time passcode-based verification method through the person’s registered mobile number. This can be done on UIDAI’s self-service update portal- ssup.uidai.gov.in.
  2. For using online self service update portal (SSUP) for updates, mobile number must be registered with Aadhaar. In case the mobile number is not registered, users are required to visit the nearest permanent enrolment centre with supporting documents.
  3. Subscribers are required to upload a scanned image of either the original proof of address (PoA) or a self-attested copy of the document for making an update/correction request.
  4. In addition to English, one can update/make corrections in address in any of the following languages- Assamese, Bengali, English, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu.
  5. On successful submission of an online address update request, users will receive a URN (Update Request Number) of the format 0000/00XXX/XXXXX. This is shown on screen and also sent via SMS to the registered mobile number. One can use this URN and Aadhaar number to track status of Aadhaar update.
  6. In case the Aadhaar holder doesn’t have documents, he/she can submit a request for address validation letter. This letter contains a secret code sent for validation after the address verifier gives consent for the use of his/her address by the requesting resident. After the request is submitted successfully, the resident will get the Aadhaar validation letter within 30 days from the date of raising request.
  7. For other details updates such as demographic details (name, address, date of birth, gender, mobile number, email) as well as biometrics (finger prints, iris and photograph) in Aadhaar, users are required to visit permanent enrolment center.
  8. For updating mobile number fed into Aadhaar’s database, users are required to visit the permanent enrolment center.
  9. Changing the mobile number registered with the Aadhaar system requires biometric authentication by the person and for this the user has to visit an Aadhaar centre – either an independent Aadhaar centre or one located in either a bank or a post office – in person.
  10. If the user has Aadhaar registered mobile number, he/she can also check the Aadhaar update history. The Aadhaar update history shows details of the updates made in Aadhaar since its generation. It could be any update relating to name, address, date of birth, gender, mobile or email id. Users can log on to UIDAI’s official website, uidai.gov.in, to view Aadhaar update history.

Victory Flame’ reaches Leh

‘Victory Flame’ reaches Leh

Army men receive the ‘Victory Flame’ in Leh. Tribune Photo

Leh, July 24

After covering nearly 1,000 km from Delhi, the ‘Victory Flame’ today reached Leh before reaching the final stop at Drass in Kargil district.

At Leh, the ‘Victory Flame’ was received by Lt Gen YK Joshi, GOC, Fire and Fury Corps, from Col Sonam Wangchuk, Kargil war hero and Mahavir Chakra awardee. The flame was kindled at the National War Memorial in New Delhi on July 14 and was lit by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The flame was carried by relay in all major cities and towns in North India before reaching Leh. It will reach Drass on Friday to commemorate India’s victory over Pakistan in the Kargil conflict. It will be merged with the eternal flame at the Kargil War Memorial in Drass.

During the relay, flame-bears crossed major passes, including Rohtang La, Bara-lacha La, Namki La, Lachulung La and Tanglang La. — TNS


Heavy shelling along LoC, one dead in Mendhar

Heavy shelling   along LoC, one dead in Mendhar

The Pakistan army targeted forward locations/posts of the Indian Army. File photo

Our Correspondent

Rajouri, July 20

Amid heavy shelling along the Line of Control (LoC) in Poonch district on Saturday, a man died of heart attack as mortar shells landed near his house, while in another village the deputy sarpanch received splinter injuries and was rushed to the district hospital at Poonch.

The firing and shelling came close to the day-long visit of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Jammu and Kashmir. The Pakistan army targeted forward locations/posts of the Indian Army and many stray mortar shells landed in the villages situated between LoC and the fence.

“Around 9 am, Pakistan initiated unprovoked ceasefire violation with firing of small arms and shelling with mortars along the LoC in the Mendhar sector. The Indian Army retaliated befittingly,” said Lt Col Davender Anand, PRO Defence.

Dr Parvaiz Khan, Block Medical Officer, Mendhar, said Manzoor Hussain (60) of Dheri Dabsi village died due to heart attack when a few shells landed near his house.

Deputy sarpanch of the Kisti Balnoi panchayat Zaffar-Ullah-Khan received splinter injuries in the right hand and was taken to the Poonch district hospital, he added.

 


Don’t be miserly with disability pensions for faujis by Nalin Mehta

 
For a government that is so invested in its public imagery to promoting the cult of the soldier as the vanguard of the republic, it is strange to see so much soldiering angst over what many in uniform regard as petty bureaucratic moves to curtail their entitlements. The latest flashpoint is the June 24 circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which makes previously tax-free disability pensions, which are paid over and above regular pensions to disabled soldiers, taxable. Only soldiers who are forced to leave service prematurely due to a disability incurred in service are exempt.
It means that other disabled soldiers, like Major General Ian Cardozo (retd) of 5 Gorkha Rifles, who famously amputated his leg with a khukri after a landmine blast in the 1971 war and then went on to become the Indian Army’s first war-disabled officer to command a regiment and brigade, will lose the tax-free status on their disability pensions. All because he soldiered on with one leg to complete service.
Not surprisingly, this has led to much heartburn with several distinguished veterans coming out openly in opposition. To be sure, defence minister Rajnath Singh has assured Parliament that he has sought a clarification from CBDT and emphasised that “under no circumstances” will the government let “whatever conveniences were earlier available in the case of valid disability cases” be reduced.
Equally, Army Headquarters, initially in an unsigned letter tweeted by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, and later directly on its own Twitter handle, has defended the tax move. It says it is concerned about misuse and the rising numbers of those receiving disability pensions for what it calls “lifestyle diseases”. The Army’s official view echoes the CBDT chairman’s justification that disability pensions were being misused. This line of reasoning is problematic. First, if there is indeed misuse and if some senior generals have been using their clout with army doctors to get uncalled-for disability status, then the army must fix its system and give exemplary punishment to those gaming it. Instead, its solution of withdrawing the benefit altogether for the entire fraternity is a callous form of collective punishment. It flies against any notion of natural justice.
As former vice chief Lt General Vijay Oberoi (retd) has written: “This withdrawal of IT exemption trivialises me personally, as having lost a leg in the 1965 India-Pakistan war, when I was a captain, I not only soldiered on and competed with my peers… serving the nation and the army for decades, my disability notwithstanding.”
Second, vague allegations of misuse are dangerous and stigmatising. It would be as absurd as believing that just because some erring soldiers indulged in human rights abuses in some cases, the whole force is responsible and must be punished. Like the army weeds out wrong-doers in those specific cases, it must do so in this case too.
Third, we must be careful about denigrating what are being called “lifestyle diseases”. Those receiving disability pensions are doing so under existing rules, duly certified by professional medical boards. If someone suffers oedema as a result of serving in high-altitude areas in Siachen or hypertension as a result of severe stress in zero-error jobs, should we grudge them their pensions?
Fourth, look at what other big countries do for their soldiers. A global benchmarking done by Col DPK Pillay (retd) and Mrityunjay Dubey at Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis shows that the US, the UK and Russia all pay tax-free benefits for disabilities. In the US, veterans can claim these for secondary disabilities (lifestyle diseases) which may come up long after leaving service. In the UK, veterans can claim tax-free benefits for mental disorders up to seven years after an incident.
Governments the world over, for instance, recognise PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). Indian Army does not publish PTSD numbers but its soldiers serve longer tours of duty (2-3 years) in active areas than their American counterparts (6 months). As lawyer-soldier Maj Navdeep Singh (retd) has shown: “US military currently pays disability benefits to 4.75 million retirees. On the other hand, the number of such beneficiaries in India… is less than 0.2 million.”
Fifth, the amount spent on disability pensions is minuscule. This is why a committee set up in 2015 by the then defence minister Manohar Parrikar had recommended that all appeals pending against disabled soldiers in the Supreme Court — which dismissed about 800 such cases between 2014-17 — be withdrawn immediately.
Kautilya’s 2,000-year-old Arthashastra has a 30-point list of things that may negatively impact an army’s morale. On top of the list: not being given due honours, not being paid and not being healthy. As the government reviews disability pensions, heeding this ancient treatise would be beneficial.

Foundation stone of Guru Nanak varsity laid in Pakistan

Foundation stone of Guru Nanak varsity laid in Pakistan

Pakistan Punjab”s Chief Minister Usman Buzdar laying the foundation stone of Baba Guru Nanak International University. — Video grab

Lahore, July 13

The foundation stone of Baba Guru Nanak International University has been laid in Nankana Sahib, the birth place of founder of Sikhism Baba Guru Nanak Dev, in Pakistan’s Punjab province, more that a decade after its construction proposal first surfaced.

The foundation stone of the university was laid by Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar on Friday and would be completed with an amount of over Rs 258 crore spread over 10 acres.

The government, however, has not yet declared about the tentative period the varsity would be built. 

“The construction of the BGNU will begin once the legal formalities in this regard are met,” an official of the Punjab government told PTI on Saturday.

He said the work on this project will begin soon since Nankana Sahib falls in the constituency of Federal Interior Minister Brig Ijaz Shah (retd). 

“Brig Shah is a powerful minister in PM Imran Khan’s cabinet and on his invitation Punjab CM Buzdar came to Nankana Sahib and laid the foundation stone of the BGNIU,” he said.

Brig Shah recently took over as the interior minister.

During the occasion, Buzdar said various neglected districts like Nankana Sahib will be brought at par with the developed cities.

“Establishment of Baba Guru Nanak University in Nankana Sahib is the part of prime minister’s vision to facilitate students in Nankana Sahib and other adjoining districts,” he said.

The decision to construct the university came after the Sikhs living in Pakistan demanded a university after the name of  the founder of their religion Baba Guru Nanak at his birthplace in Nankana Sahib.

The proposal of the university was first surfaced in the Punjab government of Pervaiz Elahi in 2003.

Two years ago in the government of PML-N, the Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB) gave a final approval to the project.

Then ETPB chairman Siddiqul Farooq said this varsity would help promote religious tourism in Pakistan and also portray country’s good image at international level.

Earlier this year, for the first time a Pakistani university had created the Baba Guru Nanak research chair to promote the message of peace that the Sikh spiritual leader preached.

A motel of the Tourism Development Corporation of Punjab (TDCP) was also inaugurated in Nankana Sahib by the Punjab CM to promote religious tourism.

Buzdar also laid the foundation stone of a road repair project in  Nankana Sahib district that will be completed with Rs 150 million.

“A dual road will also be laid from Gurdawara Tanboo Sahib to Gurdwara Janam Asthaan. The road connecting the Guru Nanak University to Nankana-Warburton Road will also be constructed,” a senior official said. — PTI

 


Six months of Pulwama terror attack: Two households are united in grief, seek relief

Six months of Pulwama terror attack: Two households are united in grief, seek relief

CRPF head constable Vijay Soreng with second wife and children.

Karmela Devi, 40, sounded sad and anguished on Friday while talking about her late husband, CRPF head constable Vijay Soreng.

The 45-year-old was killed when a suicide bomber rammed his SUV into a CRPF convoy in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pulwama on February 14, 2019.

“We haven’t any received any compensation till now,” Karmela said. Revealing that the family was struck by a double whammy, she said, “Hum badi wali [wife] hain, ek chhoti wali [wife] bhi hai, unhonay bhi compensation manga hai.”

The national tragedy, Pulwama terror attack, had received strong reactions nationwide. Karmela got married in 1990 and has a 24-year-old son. Her husband left her after her son was born. She joined Jharkhand police and is a havaldar in its Mahila Wing, a desperate move to earn a livelihood as her husband stopped supporting her and their son.

Though separated, Soreng never legally divorced her. His second wife Vimla Devi choked when she was asked to give details of her marriage to the soldier. She got married to Soreng in 2011 with their families’ consent, knowing that he had left his first wife. She gave birth to four children – three girls and one boy. She said, “My husband left his first wife long ago. He was living with us.”

She also has pictures to support that they had a happy family until the tragedy struck them.

“He loved to spend time with us, he did not get along well with his estranged wife Karmela. My eldest daughter is 13-year-old, and the youngest one is seven. He would send us Rs 12000 for education and household expenditure every month.”

After the February terror attack, the only source of income in the family stopped. The once prosperous family has been getting financial help in “bits and pieces” as they chip in to help the family. Both the wives now claim to be the rightful claimant of the benefits and compensation after the soldier died in the line of duty.

Head constable Vijay Soreng, a soldier of 82 Battalion, who was deployed in Srinagar, died when he was returning from leave to join his team in Kashmir. Suicide bomber Adil Dar struck the convoy in Pulwama, blowing to smithereens, the soldier’s body.

That is the last time the family heard from him. CRPF sources said that they found out the matter only after they handed over the body to his wives and aged parents.

Both the women have now staked a claim for remuneration and benefits, putting the CRPF in a fix.

Soreng joined the force in 1993 and as per documentation, he ought to reveal correctly the status of his marriage. But understanding the sensitivity of the matter, the CRPF is awaiting a decision by the local court to settle the matter for the “right precedent”.


Demonising Soldiers Over Disability Tax Lowers Morale of Entire Army By Lt Gen Hooda

Those unfairly exploiting the system should be given exemplary punishments, but demonising of soldiers and threatening withdrawal of facilities is not good for the morale of the army.

Lt Gen (Retd) DS Hooda |

Updated:July 4, 2019, 9:01 PM IST

On June 24 ,the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a circular withdrawing the benefit of income tax exemption on the disability pension to military veterans who had retired after serving their full term.
The veteran community rose up in protest against one more instance of bureaucratic apathy towards the armed forces and the typical insensitivity in dealing with disability cases. Facing criticism, the defence minister promised in Parliament that he would look into the matter.
The dust kicked up by the finance ministry circular would probably have died down in a few days after the usual Twitter war and television debates. The outcome would either have been a retraction of the order, as has happened in a few cases in the past, or a weary acceptance by the disabled veterans to start paying the income tax.
However, the events that followed a few days later reignited the debate. These events are, in my opinion, much more worrying when viewed within the broader context of our civil-military relations. On July 2, the Finance Minister tweeted an undated and unsigned letter calling it the “response of the armed forces on the issue of taxability of disability pension”. It is evident that this response came after the CBDT circular had already been issued because it quoted the case of Major General Ian Cardozo who had appeared on some television channels and criticised the government’s move.
Even considering that the finance minister’s decision was based on prior recommendations of the army, the alacrity with which the decision was taken is remarkable. Contrast this with the anomalies of the 7th Pay Commission remaining unresolved, the Justice Reddy report on One Rank, One Pension seemingly buried, and the recommendations of the military on Non-Functional Upgrade not being accepted. The last case is being fiercely contested by the government in the Supreme Court.
There is also a more significant issue of the political leadership placing the military in front while taking policy decisions. Having taken a consistent stance in the past that no one should question the military, there is now an attempt by the government to put the onus for this poor decision on the army. However, in a democracy, policy-making should remain firmly in the hands of the civilian government and hiding behind the military has many adverse implications on the future of our civil-military relations.
It is also worrying that the army has willingly lent its shoulder to a decision that goes against its own soldiers. The language in the letter tweeted by the finance minister was in extremely poor taste, but the speed and manner in which the official Twitter handle of the Indian Army reacted was even more shocking.
In retweeting the letter, it sought to justify the decision based on the exploitation of disability benefits by “unscrupulous personnel” and a rise in “personnel seeking disability, even for lifestyle diseases”.
There are many logical and legal infirmities with the justifications given in the letter, but my intention is not to go into these. What is of greater concern is a growing trend in the army to make public comments that paint its own officers and men in poor light. We regularly read about the misuse of hotel stay, canteen facilities, ex-servicemen health benefits, and now disability pension. If there are infirmities in our procedures, they must be ruthlessly plugged and those unfairly exploiting the system should be given exemplary punishments. However, this demonising of the officers and soldiers and threatening withdrawal of facilities is not good for the morale of the army.
There is an accepted ‘Military Covenant’ between the nation and its soldiers. Some countries like the United Kingdom have formally introduced this term in public life, while others look upon it as an unspoken pact, but the meaning of the covenant is clear. Soldiers put the nation above themselves and willingly sacrifice their limbs and lives in the line of duty.
In return, the state has the moral obligation to value, respect, and support the soldiers and their families with commensurate conditions of service. This is a mutual obligation that forms the basis of the relationship between a country and the members of the armed forces, and any weakening of this bond due to suspicion and mistrust does not bode well.
Many respected veterans have expressed the confidence that the decision on taxing the disability pension will be reversed with the intervention of the defence minister. Mr. Rajnath Singh is an ardent supporter of the soldier, and his first visit after taking charge was to the Siachen Glacier. Among those waiting anxiously for his decision will be the soldier who lost his foot to a mine blast while returning after successfully carrying out the ‘surgical strike’ of September 2016.
(The author is former Northern Commander, Indian Army, under whose leadership India carried out surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016. Views are personal.)