Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Defence Related News

History of Struggle for Abrogation of Article 370 By Brig Anil Gupta

The political movement headed by Sheikh Abdullah that originated in Kashmir in 1931 (as part of a British conspiracy against the Maharaja) remained to some extent unsuccessful to gain the support of Jammu especially the Hindu dominated areas. Its genesis, growth and ideological moorings made it a suspect in the eyes of the Dogra Nationalists of Jammu who looked upon it as something alien and unacceptable. Pt Prem Nath Dogra led the All Jammu & Kashmir Rajya Hindu Sabha as the main opposition party. It merged with Praja Parishad which was formed in Jammu immediately after the tribal invasion in November 1947. The genesis of the history of struggle for total integration of the state with India began with the birth of All Jammu & Kashmir Praja Parishad popularly known as Praja Parishad. The existence of Praja Parishad as a protest movement opposed the Sheikh’s major policy planks such as abolition of land-lords, anti-Dogra drive, attempts at framing a separate constitution for the Jammu and Kashmir state and a separate flag, emblem etc.

Sheikh Abdullah became the Prime Minister of J&K in March 1948. He abhorred opposition. He wanted to become de facto ruler of J&K and replace monarchy with a dynastic rule. He was an advocate of “One Party State”. He forced Nehru to introduce Article 370 in the Constitution of India to ensure Kashmiri Muslim Domination over Jammu & Ladakh. He was successful in his endeavour and went ahead with his plan of annihilation of the opposition. His cronies chanted slogans like, ‘ek Rehnama, Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, ek Tanzeem National Conference, ek Jhanda, Halwala, ek Manshoor (manifesto) Naya Kashmir’ which created an intriguing situation in Jammu and Kashmir ringing the bells of imminent danger among the pro-integration Dogras of Jammu.

Visionary Pt. Prem Nath Dogra and his colleagues felt this rat-race was dangerous for the growth of democracy as this sentiment of “ek” would lead Sheikh Abdullah to fulfil his ambition of a “Single Party State” leading to totalitarianism. For democracy to prosper in the state and for establishment of true Lok Raj, existence of a strong opposition party was essential. Praja Parishad was expected to foot the bill. Moreover, the policies of Sheikh Abdullah were exclusive confined to the welfare of Kashmiri Muslims and ignored the sentiments and interests of the people of Jammu and Ladakh region. He could not think beyond Kashmiri speaking Muslims of the Valley. His animosity with the Maharaja transformed into hatred for the Dogras of Jammu which was unjust and unfair. Unfortunately, he enjoyed the backing of the ruling party in the Centre and the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.

Though Jammu and Kashmir comprised of three distinct culturally and geographically exclusive regions namely Kashmir, Jammu and Ladakh yet the central leadership did not look beyond Kashmir and Sheikh Abdullah. The Kashmir centric inclination of the central government was a major cause of concern for the people of Jammu. The main task to which Praja Parishad was committed was the full integration of Jammu and Kashmir State with the Indian union, like other acceding states and safeguard the legitimate democratic rights of the people of Jammu from the anti-Dogra stance of Sheikh Abdullah government.

Sheikh’s continued discriminatory policies helped in Praja Parishad becoming popular in Jammu region among all sections including the Muslims. This growing popularity of Praja Parishad created panic in the Abdullah camp and he resorted to strong arm tactics to supress the growth of Praja Parishad since it posed a strong challenge to his political ambitions. Several activists were expelled from the State including the author’s grandfather Advocate Bishan Das Mahajan of RS Pura along with his family.
The leaders of Praja Parishad , considered a threat by Sheikh Abdullah, were put behind the bar in February 1949. Section 3 of Ranbir Penal Code (RPC), which is known as ‘Daffa Tun’ i.e. put in lockup without any trial, was slapped on Pt. Dogra and his colleagues. They were shifted to Srinagar jail to face severe winter cold. The extent of the NC rulers pique towards Praja Parishad could be gauged from the fact that on the jail’s account board the activists were listed as “Enemy Agent”.

By mid – 1949 Sheikh imprisoned as many as 294 Parishad workers. In May 1949, Praja Parishad started ‘Satyagrah’ for ensuring the release of Pt. Dogra. Though Abdullah wanted to crush this movement but he could not do so and finally he yielded to the pressure of the ‘Sataygrah’ and was forced to release Pt. Dogra from Jail on 8th October 1949 with the intervention of some nationalist leaders in Delhi. The atrocities of Sheikh on ‘Satyagrahis’ were such that incapacitated many of them including Pt. Dogra.

But this was not an end of the persecution and high handedness of Abdullah government. His hatred against the nationalists was aggravated by the fact that Parishad’s demand for full integration clashed directly with the demand of National Conference for complete autonomy of the state. As many as 15 youths were shot dead and some others injured at various places for hoisting the Indian Tricolour. The agitation launched by Parishad also included the demand for abolishing of permit system for entering or leaving the state.

Many may argue the timing of this article and need for it being written now under the changed circumstances. A reference to the beautifully worded poem of the famous poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow will not be out of place. “Heights by great men reached and kept were not attained by sudden flight but they, while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night.” Now that the full integration has been achieved and Art 370 has lost its relevance, it is imperative for the present generation to know many sacrifices made and struggles launched by their predecessors which acted as the enabler of present landmark achievement.

The party tirelessly tried to unite the people of Jammu with a view to foil the attempts of those who either favoured autonomy or tried to separate the state from Indian Union. By 1951 the Party had become a power to reckon in the areas of Jammu and the only one which was in any real sense the opposition party. Praja Parishad always opposed the setting up of a separate Constituent Assembly for the state. It favoured the application of Indian Constitution.

Despite being opposed to a separate constitution for the state, a special session of the party held on May 8, 1951, decided to contest the elections to the constituent Assembly of the State. Because of the large scale rejection of nomination papers of its candidates and nefarious manipulation of the elections by Sheikh Abdullah, party decided to boycott the elections in protest. The party in spite of its strong support base did not have a single member in the constituent assembly which under Sheikh’s leadership went ahead with framing a constitution that promoted the concept of ‘State within a State.’

National Conference (NC) and its leader Sheikh did everything to ensure that all the members of NC would be there in Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly. Sheikh dubbed the members of Praja Parishad as communal ignoring the fact that many Muslims were also contesting on the ticket of Praja Parishad. Praja Parishad turned into a mass movement and it played a key role in opposing separatist and communal politics in Jammu and Kashmir. Parishad always favoured the complete and total integration of Jammu and Kashmir with India and was opposed to Article 370.

Emboldened by the support he enjoyed from Nehru and after signing of Delhi Agreement, Sheikh started hoisting the National Conference flag in official functions and atop government buildings. However, in keeping with his habit of double-speak he implemented the Agreement only in part to further his agenda of autonomy. On January 15, 1952, Sheikh delivered a speech in an official function at Gandhi Memorial College, Jammu and hoisted National Conference Flag alongside the National Flag asking the students to salute it but the students objected to it. This infuriated Abdullah and he ensured that the students were penalized. This was followed by 38 days of hunger strike by students in 1952. On February 8, 1952 people in Jammu came out in solidarity with the protesting students that further infuriated Sheikh and he imposed curfew and arrested Pt. Dogra. This was followed by intense public pressure that forced Delhi to act and ensure the release of Pt. Dogra and others.

It soon turned into a public movement against the despotic rule of Sheikh and his anti-national activities. The movement found support nationally in form of Bhartiya Jan Sangh which was formed in 1951.

Another mass movement was launched by Parishad in November 1952 against the separatist and communal politics of Abdullah. Jan Sangh President Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee announced in December 1952 to launch a nation-wide agitation for the abolition of Article 370. On May 8, 1953 he decided to enter J&K violating the prevalent permit system and was arrested by Sheikh as soon as he set foot on the soil of the state. Mookerjee intended to lead the ongoing full-blown public agitation in Jammu. The agitation had a powerful slogan: Ek Desh mein Do Vidhan, Ek Desh mein Do Nishaan, Ek Desh mein Do Pradhan, nahin challenegey, nahin challengey. He was jailed and tortured at Srinagar under the despotic rule of Sheikh which led to his mysterious death on 23 June 1953. An estimated 10,000 activists were imprisoned in Jammu, Punjab and Delhi, including Members of Parliament leading to an uproar in India.

Blinded by his ambition, Sheikh indulged in competitive communalism and worked towards establishment of independent Muslim majority state claiming that India was not secular enough. Parishad opposed it tooth and nail and accused that Sheikh was not Indian enough. Sheikh was finally arrested in August 1953 after he made secessionist speeches at RS Pura on April 10 and on 13 July stating in public, “Kashmir should have sympathy of both India and Pakistan…It is not necessary for our state to become an appendage of either India or Pakistan.”
Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad, who succeeded Sheikh implemented all the provisions of Delhi Agreement thus facilitating greater integration with the Centre. Praja Parishad movement largely subsided after these events. Parishad finally merged with Jan Sangh in 1963 and two years later National Conference merged with Congress.

Ever since then Jan Sangh and later Bharatiya Janata Party has been struggling and agitating for ending the special status of the state which not only promoted separatism, religious militancy and was the major cause of rampant corruption and under development of the state. Re-entry of Sheikh Abdullah in state politics in 1975 under an agreement with then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and subsequent Rajiv-Farooq accord and Rahul-Omar bonhomie gave a new fillip to the demand for greater autonomy and saw rise of jihadi and radical forces in Kashmir.
The historic decision of August 5, 2019 is the result of the struggle and sacrifices of three generations of Praja Parishad, Jan Sangh & BJP workers. BJP as successor of Jan Sangh remained focussed and committed to abolition of Article 370 and full integration of the state with India. Many accused BJP of using it only as an election plank to woo voters in the Hindi heartland but all of them have been proved wrong.

J&K unit of BJP recently held a function to honour the activists and family members of those who were associated with the Praja Parishad agitation. A noble gesture to recognise the sacrifices and contributions of those great men whose dream of full integration of the State has at last been achieved.
My effort at recollecting history will be incomplete without acknowledging the hard work and dedicated effort of Kul Bhushan Mahotra, incharge Library Department of state BJP who has compiled three books which will prove as a treasure for those who want to study in detail the genesis of the Praja Parishad movement and abolition of Article 370.

(The author is a Jammu based political commentator and columnist. The article is based on personal accounts and available literature. He can be contacted at anil5457@gmail)
Brig Veteran Anil Gupta

Hits: 13


FATAH: Pakistan threatens the world with nuclear war

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan addresses the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, on Sept. 27, 2019.Brendan Mcdermid / Reuters

Not since 1956 when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev threatened the West with the infamous words, “We will bury you” have world leaders heard the head of a nuclear state brandish its atomic weapons to intimidate the world.

Almost 60 years after Khrushchev said these words at a reception in Moscow while addressing Western ambassadors, the Islamic State of Pakistan was back at the centre of the world’s attention as its prime minister raised the spectre of a nuclear war engulfing the globe.

Last Friday, Imran Khan rose to address a poorly attended hall of the UN General Assembly and in a not-so-disguised threat said, if the world did not pay attention to his penchant for a jihad against neighbouring India over the Indian state of Kashmir, a nuclear war would ensue and engulf the rest of the world:

“If a conventional war starts between the two countries … anything could happen. But supposing a country [Pakistan] seven times smaller than its neighbour [India] is faced with the choice either you surrender, or you fight for your freedom till death? “What will we do? I ask myself this question … and we will fight. … and when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, it will have consequences far beyond the borders.”

Khan warned of a “blood bath” in Kashmir, where New Delhi has taken steps to fully integrate the territory with the rest of the country by amending the country’s constitution that hitherto had granted greater autonomy to the region than that given to the other 29 Indian states.

The Pakistani prime minister positioned himself as leader of the Islamic world and thus having authority to speak on behalf of India’s Kashmiri Muslims. In a provocative remark, Khan posed a rhetorical question: “Would I want to live like that?” Then answering his own question, he declared, “I would pick up a gun.”

And then to claim plausible deniability, he backtracked to say: “I am not threatening here about a nuclear war; it is a worry. It is a test for the United Nations. You are the one who said Kashmir has the right to self-determination. This is not the time for appeasement like that in 1939 in Munich.”

Was Imran Khan equating the world’s largest democracy India with Nazi Germany? Was he making a parallel between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler?

Outrageous as it may sound, but, yes the man known as ‘Taliban Khan’ did accuse the Indian leader of being a fascist just as Pakistani-Americans on the streets of New York roamed around with posters showing Mr. Modi as Hitler, chanting “Allah O Akbar” as they attacked and browbeat anti-Jihadi exiles from Balochistan and Sindh who were protesting human rights violations inside the Islamic State of Pakistan.

The threats of nuclear war by Imran Khan were met with a calm response from Indian diplomat Vidisha Maitra. Addressing the General Assembly in her right of reply to Khan, she said: “Prime Minister Imran Khan’s threat of unleashing nuclear devastation, qualifies as brinksmanship, not statesmanship. Even coming from the leader of a country that has monopolized the entire value chain of the industry of terrorism, Prime Minister Khan’s justification of terrorism was brazen and incendiary.”

And in response to the Pakistan Prime Minister’s declaration that “There is no God, but Allah,” the Indian diplomat said: “Unfortunately, what we heard today from Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan was a callous portrayal of the world in binary terms. Us vs Them; … Muslims vs Others. A script that fosters divisiveness at the United Nations. Attempts to sharpen differences and stir up hatred, are simply put – hate speech.”


Massive China police drill raises fears in Hong Kong

VEILED THREAT? Footage shows thousands of cops tackling mock protesters in hats and face masks

BEIJING/HONGKONG: Thousands of Chinese riot police staged a drill just across the border from Hong Kong, in what appeared to be a thinly veiled warning from Beijing about its ability to end two months of protests in the global financial hub.

AFP■ Photo taken on Tuesday shows Chinese paramilitary police officers taking part in a drill in Shenzhen, across the border from Hong Kong.

The exercise, which took place on Tuesday in Shenzhen – a city in southern China that borders the semi-autonomous city – instantly attracted online attention given the close resemblance between the drill and the ongoing clashes in adjacent Hong Kong.

The footage showed squads of police facing down “protesters” dressed in construction hats and face masks – reminiscent of demonstrators in Hong Kong.

As the crowd attacked police with long, wooden poles, officers pushed back with riot shields and deployed tear gas.

“All police forces in Shenzhen are always ready!” Shenzhen police wrote in an online post about Tuesday’s drills, which it said involved 12,000 police officers.

CHINA: BIGGEST CRISIS SINCE 1997 HANDOVER Hong Kong is facing its “most severe situation” since its handover from British rule in 1997 following weeks of demonstrations and the central government is considering what measures to take next, the head of Beijing’s Cabinet office responsible for the territory said on Wednesday.

Zhang Xiaoming was speaking to Hong Kong residents attending a seminar in the mainland city of Shenzhen.

The protests are having “an increasingly broad impact on society”, Zhang told the 500 attendees, who included members of the Hong Kong and central government legislative and advisory bodies. “It can be said that Hong Kong is facing the most severe situation it has faced since the handover,” Zhang said.


Nuclear weapons not made for war-fighting, says Indian army chief Bipin Rawat

NEW DELHI: Indian army chief General Bipin Rawat and Indian air force head Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria last week once again threatened Pakistan with strikes, whipping up war-hysteria over occupied Kashmir.

According to a report by Indian daily The Times of India, the top Indian commander said that Indian troops would go across the Line of Control, referencing a controversial strike in Balakot that Pakistan claims only shelled some trees.

In response to a question about the use of nuclear weapons, General Rawat said that nuclear weapons were not weapons of war fighting, and that those proclaiming they would use them in conventional warfare were not in a right state of mind.

“They are not weapons for war fighting. I find it difficult to comprehend when someone proclaims he will use them for conventional war fighting or if he is attacked. Will the world community ever allow you to use nuclear weapons like this?,” he questioned, according to TOI.

Earlier in September, Indian air force chief Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria had said that the Indian air force was ready for action against Pakistan and had purchased the new Rafale aircraft in this context.

“Rafale is a very capable aircraft, once we induct it, it will be a game-changer in terms of our operational capability. It will give us an edge over Pakistan and China,” Bhadauria told Indian media after taking over as Indian air force chief last month.


Pak downgrades ties, India unfazed Suspends trade | Partially closes air space | No word on Kartarpur corridor

http://

Sandeep Dikshit

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 7

India opted not to respond to a series of measures announced by Pakistan on Wednesday as a fallout of Parliament approving the reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories. Pakistan has asked India to withdraw its High Commissioner Ajay Bisaria and, for now, decided not to send its new High Commissioner to take up his India posting.

Late in the evening, Pakistan ordered changes in routes by Indian flights through its airspace. India, on its part, issued a security alert at 19 airports and deployed additional security personnel apart from regular deployment at airports. Sources said the closure of one air corridor requiring a maximum of 12 minutes of diversion would not really affect airlines.

After the second meeting in a week of the National Security Committee comprising top Cabinet Ministers and Pakistan Army officers, Pakistan today suspended bilateral trade and decided to step up diplomatic outreach, including approaching the UN and UN Security Council over Kashmir.

Sources said Pakistan was off the mark in taking these measures and that Pakistan had no locus standi to interfere in what was entirely India’s internal matter.

Reacting to reports of UN-blacklisted terrorist Hafiz Saeed’s conviction, the sources said they were trying to ascertain details. “We have to know if he was really convicted and on what charges. We also have to find out the appeals process and whether he will be let off during the pendency of the appeal.”

Pakistan will also review bilateral arrangements and observe its Independence Day on August 14 in solidarity with the “brave Kashmiris and their just struggle for their right of self-determination”. India’s Independence Day on August 15 will be observed as a “Black Day”, resolved Pakistan’s National Security Committee. There is, however, no word on the fate of Kartarpur corridor.

The Pakistan PM has directed that all diplomatic channels be activated to launch a broadside against India.

Pak’s 5-pt offensive

  • Downgrades diplomatic ties
  • Suspends bilateral trade
  • Reviews bilateral measures
  • To go to UN Security Council
  • Aug 14 as J&K ‘solidarity day’

Letter to President

The All-Party Action Committee, Kargil, on Wednesdaywrote to the President, seeking immediate restoration of Article 370, 35-A, describing the Centre’s decision a “coup against India’s Constitution”

Mufti asks PDP MPs to resign 

  • Former CM Mehbooba Mufti has asked the two PDP members to resign from the Rajya Sabha
  • PDP’s Mir Fayaz and Nazir Ahmed Laway were on Monday physically removed from the House after they tore a copy of the Constitution, expressing their anger against the government move to scrap Article 370

Army officer reviews security arrangements in forward areas

Army officer reviews security arrangements in forward areas

Western Army Commander Lt Gen RP Singh along with GOC Golden Arrow Division during a visit to forward area.

Our Correspondent

Ferozepur, September 29

The Western Army Commander, Lieutenant General RP Singh, yesterday visited the forward areas under the command of Golden Arrow Division to review the operational preparedness of the Army.

Major General Amit Loomba, GOC, Golden Arrow Division, and other senior officials of the formation briefed the GOC-in-C.

While interacting with the senior officers and troops, Lieutenant General Singh asked them to remain prepared to respond to any challenge at any time. During his visit to the station, the Army Commander appreciated the development works and multifarious measures undertaken by the division for the welfare of troops. He complimented the efforts put in by the division for addressing the long-pending issues of ex-servicemen and “Veer Naaris”. He urged all ranks to continue to maintain highest standard of operational preparedness and training in sync with the legacy of the division. Senior officials from the command and Vajra Corps accompanied him.

 


Air Commodore Tejbir Singh takes over as AOC, 12 Wing

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh takes over as AOC, 12 Wing

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh (right) after taking over as the Air Officer Commanding, 12 Wing, from Air Commodore S Srinivasan in Chandigarh on Monday. Tribune photo

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 5

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh assumed charge as the Air Officer Commanding (AOC), 12 Wing, here today. He takes over from Air Commodore S Srinivasan, who has moved to the Western Air Command Headquarters.

A ceremonial parade was held at the Air Force Station, Chandigarh, to mark the change of guard.

Commissioned into the Indian Air Force (IAF) on December 17, 1988, Air Commodore Tejbir Singh is an alumnus of the National Defence Academy.

He has earlier commanded Air Force Station, Yelehanka, and is the Commodore Commandant of a premier flying squadron. He has been decorated with the Ati Vishisht Seva Medal and the Vishisht Seva Medal for distinguished services.

 


Don’t tinker with special status: Parties

http://

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, August 4

Cautioning the Centre against tinkering with the special status given to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, the all-party meet (APM) today resolved that any move to abrogate Articles 370 and 35A or trifurcation would be seen as aggression against Kashmir.

This was stated by the National Conference (NC) president Farooq Abdullah after chairing the APM which was called to discuss the prevailing situation in the Valley. At the end of meeting a statement, termed Gupkar declaration, was released which said that all parties would be united in their resolve to protect the special statuts of J&K. The valley has been on the edge for the past few days after New Delhi rushed additional forces to the state and told Amaranth pilgrims and tourists to leave Kashmir.

“It was unanimously resolved that all parties would be united in their resolve to be protect and defend the identity, autonomy and special status of the JK against all attacks and onslaughts whatsoever,” Abdullah told reporters after the meeting which was attended by former chief ministers Mehbooba Mufti, Omar Abdullah and PDP patron Muzaffar Beg, chairman Peoples Conference Sajad Gani and various senior leaders, including Taj Mohiuddin, Shah Faesal and MY Tarigami.

“That modification, abrogation of Articles 35A, 370, unconstitutional delimitation or trifurcation of the state would be an aggression against the people of Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh,” Abdullah said.

The APM delegation would also seek audience with the President, Prime Minister and leaders of other national parties in this regard.

“We will apprise them of the current situation and make an appeal to them to safeguard the legitimate interests of the people of the state with regard to constitutional guarantees given to the state in the Constitution of our country,” Abdullah said. “They will also apprise them of the unwholesome consequences bound to follow the unconstitutional violation of these guarantees.”


The Pakistan game plan by Vivek Katju

The Pakistan game plan

LOST CAUSE: No country will attempt to invoke the UN path on J&K, except in meaningless multilateral resolutions such as those of the OIC.

Vivek Katju
Ex-secretary, Ministry of External Affairs

OVERSHADOWING the seemingly positive interaction between India and Pakistan on the Kartarpur corridor and difficulties in working out the modalities for consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav are Pakistani attempts at shifting the global narrative from its involvement in terrorism to the Kashmir situation following PM Imran Khan’s Washington visit last month. Pakistan obviously feels that President Trump’s offers to mediate or arbitrate on J&K and his comments on the violence in the state have provided it an opportunity to turn the spotlight to India’s internal policies and actions in the state as well as its refusal to engage it in a comprehensive bilateral dialogue.

An insight into Pakistan’s perspective of how India has succeeded in managing the narrative and also indicative of what it believes it is up against was provided in foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s comment at a media briefing in Islamabad last week. Qureshi said, ‘We saw how after 9/11 India very cleverly and expertly started painting the right to self-determination movement with a hue of terrorism,’ adding that ‘how India with its new alignment [in the region] and market position was able to have the other countries look the other way.’

There is no doubt that the attraction of the Indian market is a factor ensuring that many important countries do not want to tread on India’s toes. Aware that India will never countenance mediation in J&K, international players either carefully avoid offering it or emphasise that their offer is contingent on both India and Pakistan accepting it. That, of course, is a no-brainer, for the pre-requisite of any mediation is the voluntary acceptance of the process by the parties concerned. Despite the somewhat dramatic nature of Trump’s offer, the US establishment has emphasised that both countries must accept it. Thus, while Pakistan will routinely call for mediation, it will have to live with disappointment.

It is also significant that the US State Department was quick to stress — and this aspect has not received the attention that it deserved — that Kashmir is a bilateral issue. In its very first statement after Trump’s July remarks, it noted, ‘While Kashmir is a bilateral issue for both parties to discuss, the Trump administration welcomes Pakistan and India sitting down and the United States ready to assist.’ The important word is ‘bilateral’. It puts paid to consistent Pakistani attempts to portray it as an international issue to be resolved in accordance with the UN resolutions. No country will attempt to invoke the UN path on J&K, except in meaningless multilateral resolutions such as those of the OIC.

Pakistan will keep harping on these themes but its real focus to change the narrative will be to highlight the situation in the Valley in the context of human rights and India’s refusal to engage in a serious dialogue to address outstanding issues. Its entire thrust will be to persuade the international community that India’s stand of no talks as long as terrorism continues is only a ruse to continue its non-engagement approach. In addition, it will and, indeed, already is reverting to its old position of its inability to pay sufficient attention to its western border because of tensions along its eastern one. Since Imran Khan’s visit it is gearing itself to go all out in these directions.

At this stage, America desperately needs Pakistan to quickly get out of the Afghan mess. Hence, Pakistan will be indulged with soothing messages. India should simply shrug them off as it should any interlocutor who seeks to suggest how India should address the situation in the Valley. Also, it should dismiss those who may advise that an India-Pakistan dialogue should take place with reiterating its reasonable demand that Pakistan should end terrorism. Interestingly, this is a point that the US is also indirectly making.

What India has to actively promote is that Pakistan’s sponsorship of terror on Indian territory shows it to be an irresponsible state; no nuclear state has ever acted so with any other nuclear state. In this context, it must also emphasise the doctrine of pre-emption spelt out immediately after the Balakot strike. That doctrine correctly asserts that escalation towards the possibility of armed conflict that can assume dangerous proportions begins not with a kinetic response to a terrorist strike but is embedded in the sponsorship of terror itself. And Pakistan’s traditional warning against India’s use of conventional armed force under a nuclear overhang is only a pretext for continuing to use terror as part of its security doctrine.

In order to counter the international community’s sentiment that it should end the use of terror, for the new Indian approach of using kinetic force makes it much too dangerous, Pakistan is in the process of shifting arguments. It is now distinguishing between skirmishes and limited wars. It has started arguing in private settings that its nuclear threshold is not so low as to be activated in skirmishes such as seen after the Pulwama attack.

Clearly, the Balakot developments have made Pakistan feel that it can handle skirmishes so long as they do not develop into limited wars. Unlike in the past when its approach was predicated on India refraining from kinetic action after an unacceptable terrorist attack, it now feels that skirmishes will be contained and is therefore likely to project that they do not carry the risk of nuclear escalation.

Indian security managers and diplomats must take note of emerging Pakistani thinking. The unmistakable lesson is that for all its professions of taking two steps forward to India’s one, the Pakistani establishment is showing no evidence of shedding its hostility towards India or its confrontationist approach; the use of terror is an inherent part of that approach.

 


Rasoolan Bibi, widow of ’65 war hero Abdul Hamid dies at 95

VARANASI: Rasoolan Bibi, the 95-year-old widow of Havildar Abdul Hamid who was posthumously awarded the Param Vir Chakra for his contribution to the 1965 India-Pakistan war, died at her home in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghazipur district on Friday after a brief illness.

HT ARCHIVE■ Rasoolan Bibi with Army Chief General Bipin Rawat in Dhamupur village of Ghazipur, UP, on September 10, 2017.

Her grandson, Jamil Alam, 34, said she was on medication but her condition suddenly deteriorated around noon on Friday and she passed on.

She was taken to a doctor in Dhamupur village a week ago after she fell ill, Jamil said. “He prescribed some medicines and advised her to consult a physician in Varanasi. We wanted to take her to Varanasi for treatment but she refused to go.”

People from nearby areas thronged their home as news of her death spread. Two years ago, Rasoolan Bibi made headlines when she said army chief General Bipin Rawat was like her son.

The occasion was the 52nd anniversary of Abdul Hamid’s martyrdom, during which Gen Rawat felicitated Rasoolan Bibi and touched her feet. His gesture was cheered by the audience.

Later, Gen Rawat had said, “I felt as if I was felicitating my mother.” During the event, Gen Rawat had saluted her as she presented him a memento and blessed him.