Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

Unveiling: Tale of torture of two Indian soldiers by Pak, bid to turn them into spies

HT Correspondent

letterschd@hindustantimes.com

CHANDIGARH : Two Indian soldiers, who went missing in the Mushkoh Valley during the Kargil conflict in September 1999, were captured by Pakistani forces and then tortured to turn them into ‘assets’ to spy on their own country.

The claim has been made in a book titled “Missing in Action: The Prisoners who Never Came Back’’ that narrates the physical and mental torment the two men of the 108 Engineer Regiment — Bathinda native Jagseer Singh and Meerut’s Arif Mohammad Khan—underwent before being given training on espionage and forced to convert to Islam by Pakistan.

Authored by senior journalist Chander Suta Dogra, the book tells how the two were declared deserters by the army and their cases were never taken up properly by the Indian government, with their families leaving all hopes of the return of the missing men.

In Pakistan, the book claims, the two were first taken to the army unit deployed close to the LoC and subjected to third-degree torture before being sent to Chaklala and Rawalpindi. They were put through four stages of indoctrination followed by Mutt and Jeff interrogation techniques, it is claimed.

Then they were given the task of opening civil canteens in the Suratgarh, Lalgarh Jattan, Ganganagar and Bathinda cantonments and to collect intelligence which was to be passed on to Pakistani agents in New Delhi. Funds were to come from Pakistan to their families.

Pakistan kept on denying having any Indian soldiers in its custody.

Meanwhile, Arif’s wife Gudiya got remarried and was pregnant with her second husband’s child till the issue of two missing soldiers cropped up in the media in 2003 when he managed to write a letter to his family that he was in Pakistan Army’s custody.

India then strongly took up the issue with Pakistan, which in 2004 agreed to release the two in exchange of release of a Pakistani soldier captured near the Line of Control (LoC) in 2002 and two civilians.

The two soldiers landed in India via the Wagah border in 2004 and the army intelligence kept them at the military hospital in Amritsar for debriefing.

The book claims the army’s intensive debriefing was intended to find out if theirs was an intentionally executed desertion or an inadvertent straying across the LoC. But intelligence sleuths found Jagseer’s behavior suspicious as he wore a white skull cap and offered namaz five times a day.

The soldiers seemed sullen and refused to talk for the first two days, the author claims quoting some officials.

But then the intelligence team befriended them and after a month they narrated the psychological exploitation, indoctrination and inhuman treatment they faced over five years meted by Pakistan to them turn into spies.

Col Bipin Pathak (retd), who had debriefed the two, is quoted in the book saying, “The two harboured a deep anger towards the army and India for letting them down as deserters. They had been told that if they went back to their units, they will be shot dead or thrown into jail.”

Col Pathak is quoted as saying the army sent them to their units from where they retired. Jagseer later joined the Punjab Police and also worked in the security of now state finance minister Manpreet Badal.

With a foreword by General VP Malik (retd), former chief of army staff, the book also carries stories of Major AK Suri, who came alive five years after he was declared dead and how Indian intelligence deduced that Flight Lieutenant TS Dandoss was not killed in an air crash but was secretly detained by Pakistan.


Chandigarh: Court martial orders woman Major’s dismissal over affair with married officer

The disciplinary proceedings against the two officers began after the wife of the Major complained to the Chief of Army Staff and the Adjutant General about her husband’s ‘affair’ with the woman officer

Chandigarh: Court martial orders woman Major’s dismissal over affair with married officer

An Army court martial has sentenced a woman Major of the Military Intelligence to be dismissed from service on charges of ‘unbecoming conduct’. (Representational Image)

An Army court martial has sentenced a woman Major of the Military Intelligence to be dismissed from service on charges of ‘unbecoming conduct’ for having an affair with a married Major.

The male officer, who belongs to Infantry, has also been been punished by another court martial for ‘unbecoming conduct’ and has been sentenced to be cashiered (stripped of rank and benefits) and given three months rigorous imprisonment.

The two officers faced charges under Section 45 of the Army Act which deals with unbecoming conduct by an officer. While the woman Major’s Summary General Courts Martial (SGCM) concluded in Jammu Sunday, the male officer’s trial gave its verdict in first week of January.

The disciplinary proceedings against the two officers began after the wife of the Major complained to the Chief of Army Staff and the Adjutant General about her husband’s ‘affair’ with the woman officer. The complainant attached several photographs and video clips as evidence of the same.

The lady officer was posted with the Northern Command Counter Intelligence Unit when she was ordered to face the trial. The male Major was serving with a Special Forces unit when the two came to know each other but he was later reverted back to his parent infantry battalion.

While the Supreme Court has ruled that adultery is not a crime, the Army takes a dim view of even consensual relationships between its male and female officers with the view that it affects the fabric of interpersonal relationship and is detrimental to maintaining discipline.

The woman Major had been in news earlier for a botched intelligence operation in Assam in December 2011. It was in the backdrop of this operation, among other issues, that the then Chief of Army Staff, Gen V K Singh, had held Lt Gen Dalbir Singh, then GOC 3 Corps and later Army Chief, responsible for improper handling of 3 Corps Intelligence and Surveillance Unit and had issued a show cause notice for censure just days before proceeding on retirement.

The show cause notice delayed the elevation of Lt Gen Dalbir Singh has General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Eastern Command, and it was only after this notice had been set aside post-retirement of Gen VK Singh, that he was able to assume office.

In 2013, the then General Officer Commanding 3 Corps, Lt Gen S L Narsimhan, had ordered that the woman officer, who was then a Major, and who led the operation in the intervening night of December 20-21, 2011, be tried summarily.


Western Command honours war widows

HT Correspondent

chandigarh@hindustantimes.com

Panchkula : Western Command, Chandimandir, organised a grievance redressal session for 137 war widows from Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali and Ropar at its headquarters on Tuesday.

The event was conducted to make them aware of their entitlements and various initiatives and schemes launched by Armed Forces and central and state governments for their welfare and to resolve their grievances.

Alka Singh, regional president, Army Womens’ Welfare Association, felicitated the war widows and they were presented with financial assistance of ₹15 lakh.

Stalls were established including grievance, pensions and veteran cells, ex-serviceman contributory health scheme (ECHS) stall, and canteen and non-canteen stores department to give the widows a platform to present their problems.


Ropar teacher scripts success story, 60 of his pupils in Army

Coaches students for free, arranges books, stationery for those in need

Ropar teacher scripts success story, 60 of his pupils in Army

Arun Sharma

Tribune News Service

Ropar, February 10

Even as the state government and the Opposition are busy targeting each other over jobs to the youth in the past three years, a government schoolteacher has done what those in power could not do. Sixty of Sher Singh’s students have already joined the Army.

Singh, a Punjabi lecturer at Government Senior Secondary School in Phulpur Garewal village, Kandi area, started coaching poor students in 2014. His aim was to get them jobs.

Singh’s efforts yielded results as 60 of his students got into the Army, 25 of whom were commissioned on Saturday. Many others got jobs in the Police Department and government sector, he said.

Singh, a postgraduate in English and science, doesn’t charge a penny from students. He even arranges books and stationery for those in need.

Three of the 25 successful students, Vir Barinder Singh, Zorawar Singh and Sharanjit Singh, have been able to make it to the technical trade in the Army against the total quota of eight posts allocated to the entire state.

Gurvinder Singh (22), son of a labourer from Rasoolpur village, said he was looking for a job after completing his graduation from Industrial Training Institute (ITI) when he came to know about Singh’s coaching centre. He studied science and mathematics for a month there and was able to crack the examination, said Gurvinder.

Similar is the story of Akashdeep Singh, a Class XII pass out, and Parminder Singh, a graduate, both from the Chamkaur Sahib area.

Singh said he thought of started coaching classes when he noticed that a majority of the students after passing out from schools and colleges roamed aimlessly in the area.

Ropar district was yet to be developed and people had small land holdings here, the youth didn’t have much to do even at home, he said.

First, he started putting up newspaper clippings regarding vacancies at the school gate so that people in the area could notice it and apply for suitable jobs. Then, he started coaching Class XI students, who were physically fit and wanted to join the Army. Soon, others contacted him and the number of students started increasing, he said. A WhatsApp group of job aspirants has been created in which information regarding jobs is shared every day.

It was not easy for students belonging to poor families to reach the school from far-off villages. Many couldn’t afford to spend on books required for coaching, he said.

“Initially, I spent money on books and other stuff, but later those belonging to well-off families started extending help,” he added.


Widows told about welfare schemes

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, February 11

As part of the Army’s efforts towards upliftment of widows of soldiers, including Veer Naris (war widows), a conclave was held at Jadhunath Sainik Institute in Chandimandir today under the aegis of Western Command.

The conclave was attended by 137 widows from Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali and Ropar.

The event was conducted with an aim of ameliorating challenges faced by the widows. The opportunity was also utilised to update them about their entitlements, resolving their grievances and making them aware of various initiatives and schemes launched by the Armed Forces as well as the Central and state governments for their welfare.

Alka Singh, Regional President, Army Wives Welfare Association (AWWA), along with other AWWA members, felicitated the widows and provided them financial assistance totalling a sum of Rs 15 lakh.

A number of stalls pertaining to the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme, Canteen Services Department, pension and veterans issues were set up to provide a platform to address their problems.


WW veterans to get enhanced pension

WW veterans to get enhanced pension

Una, February 11

Veterans of World War II will be getting an enhanced monthly old age pension of Rs 10,000. Widows of World War II veterans will get Rs 5,000 per month as old age pension with effect from September 1, 2019.

Disclosing this, Deputy Director of Una Sainik Welfare department Maj Raghbir Singh (Retd), in a press note issued here today, said the veterans were earlier getting Rs 3,000 as old age pension. He clarified that only those veterans, who were not getting any other pension, had attained the age of 60 years and whose family income was less that Rs 35,000 per year, were eligible for the scheme. — OC


Indian armed forces are at cusp of transformation: Gen Rawat

Indian armed forces are at cusp of transformation: Gen Rawat

New Delhi, February 12

India’s armed forces are at the cusp of transformation, Chief of Defence Staff Gen Bipin Rawat said on Wednesday, noting that proxy war and cross-border terrorism remained the key security challenges facing India.

Gen Rawat also rejected criticism that the armed forces are suppressing the rights of the people in Jammu and Kashmir, saying required steps are being taken considering ground realities and threats of terrorism.

Asked about his controversial comments that India had de-radicalisation camps, he said what he meant was classification of people based on their views and the impact of relentless efforts to de-radicalise young people.

“When I said camps — I meant groups of people,” he said.

In an address at the Raisina Dialogue last month, Gen Rawat had said that de-radicalisation camps are operating in the country as it is necessary to isolate people who are completely radicalised.

Girls and boys as young as 10 and 12 are being radicalised in the Valley, he said, describing it as a matter of concern. “We have got de-radicalisation camps going on in our country.”

Talking about evolving a regional security matrix, Gen Rawat said developments beyond India’s immediate neighbourhood like in West Asia might impinge on the country’s security interests.

“India needs to fulfil a larger responsibility in context of global peace. We have to expand our influence,” Gen Rawat said addressing a conclave organised by a news channel.

Asked whether creation of the chief of defence staff had added another layer of bureaucracy, the former Army chief said it was a long-pending proposal aimed at ensuring greater integration in functioning of the three services.

He said both the CDS and the defence secretary had clear responsibilities and both would work in coordination to bring in transformational changes in the military.

“Indian armed forces are at the cusp of transformation…If we look at the future of warfare, then the military has to grow. Our priority is quality, not quantity,” he said.

Gen Rawat also talked about plans to have an air defence command as well as a separate logistics command.

“The focus will be to ensure better utilisation of resources,” he said.

The CDS also said the armed forces are ready to deal with any challenge along the borders with China and Pakistan. PTI


Teenage daughter kills ex-armyman in Mathura after he opens fire at her

Teenage daughter kills ex-armyman in Mathura after he opens fire at her

Mathura, February 12

A former army personnel was allegedly shot dead by his teenage daughter after he opened fire at her and his wife, injuring them seriously at Mitthauli village in Mathura district.

The incident took place on Tuesday when Chetram, 41, took out his pistol following a heated argument in the family and shot at his 38-year-old wife and 17-year-old daughter.

As he turned the weapon to shoot his 13-year-old son, the injured daughter managed to snatch the weapon from him. She then opened fire, killing the former soldier on the spot.

Chetram had served as a naik in the Jat Regiment and retired six years ago.

Chetram’s wife and daughter are battling for their lives at a private hospital.

Circle officer Alok Dubey said while one bullet scraped past the woman’s right eyebrow, the girl sustained gunshot wounds in the abdomen. Chetram was shot in his chest and abdomen, police said.

His body has been sent for post-mortem.

Police said they were waiting for them to record their statements. The girl, who is taking coaching in Allahabad, had come home two days back. Her younger brother studies in Class 9 in Mathura.

Mathura DIG Shalabh Mathur said the police had recovered a pistol, two magazines, and three live cartridges along with two empty ones from the spot.

He said Chetram was angry over his daughter’s alleged affair with a local youth.

Meanwhile, a case has been registered under Sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC at Naujheel police station on the basis of a complaint filed by the deceased’s brother who alleged that the daughter and her boyfriend had shot dead Chetram because he opposed their relationship. IANS


No OIC meet in Pak: Great Game plays out within Islam by Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (retd)

President Ram Nath Kovind, Prime Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at Rashtrapati Bhavan, February 20, 2019. Photograph: Vijay Verma/PTI Photo

‘The more emphatic denial of any proposal for an OIC foreign ministers meet in Islamabad appears aimed at keeping Pakistan on a leash,’ notes Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (retd).

IMAGE: President Ram Nath Kovind, Prime Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi and Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at Rashtrapati Bhavan, February 20, 2019. Photograph: Vijay Verma/PTI Photo

How can India counter Pak-OIC meet on Kashmir, CAA?

Saudi-Indian bromance: What next?

Saudi-Indian bromance: What next?

At the end of December 2019, there was much hype in Pakistan about a potential Organisation of Islamic Cooperation meeting of foreign ministers in Islamabad in April 2020. It was supposed to be an event in which Kashmir would be one of the main items on the agenda, thus progressing Pakistan’s core ambition of internationalising Kashmir; it would have been a decided diplomatic coup after India had largely staved off the Islamic world from any statements on Kashmir.

The proposed meeting was rumoured to be a sequel to Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud’s rushed visit to Islamabad on December 26, 2019 essentially to thank Pakistan for having pulled out of the Kuala Lumpur summit of Islamic nations.

Now it has been made known that no such OIC conference is in the offing in Islamabad. So what is this game being played within the Islamic world?

Behind this flip flop are the dynamics of competition for power between important nations which form part of the 1.8 billion Muslim population of the world; a Great Game of sorts.

Essentially it is about six nations — Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. A seventh should have been Egypt which earlier under presidents Gamel Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat had assumed a leadership role which could not be sustained after the Camp David Accords in 1978.

Of these six nations, Indonesia is the most populous Muslim nation. Two factors seem to militate against its potential leadership role.

First is that its Islam is an evolved one, much more syncretic and secular. Second is that geographically it is too far distanced from the symbolic core centre of Islam, the holy shrines of Mecca and Medina. Indonesia may improve its economic strength in the future but will yet likely remain outside Islam’s strategic circle.

With Mohammad Mahathir’s return as Malaysia’s prime minister there is a spurt in Malaysia’s ambition. It has a 62 percent Muslim population of a total of 32 million people and a comparatively better developed economy with a reasonable level of technical manpower. Although it too is geographically far placed from West Asia aspirationally it feels it needs to play a more important leadership role in the world of Islam.

Turkey, which first turned its back on West Asia and the Arab world as a legacy of its iconic leader Kemal Ataturk and sought to be a part of Europe, is now turning its back on the latter. Under its leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey has adopted revivalism with a shift towards greater Islamist ideology.

As a nation of 81 million almost wholly Muslim population and a history of leadership delivered through the Ottomans it is powerful enough to re-invent itself to play a more active role in the Islamic world once again.

Currently, it is Saudi Arabia, which by virtue of two major factors, has dominated the proceedings. First is the emotional advantage of custodianship of the holy shrines at Mecca and Medina; the second is the wealth that it enjoys by virtue of its energy resources.

Saudi Arabia hosts the OIC secretariat in Jeddah and plays a leading role in the organisation. The OIC’s mission statement bills it as the collective voice of the Muslim world that works to protect the latter.

With 57 member States from four continents, the OIC is the second largest intergovernmental organisation in the world after the United Nations. Iran is a member of the OIC, but being a Shia nation, the sectarian divide within Islam prevents it playing the role it seeks.

The sixth nation of significance is Pakistan which has always attempted to gain significance although its impoverished economy dilutes its higher political importance within the OIC. In order to pursue a dominant role, Pakistan has always maintained a special relationship with Saudi Arabia through support to the royal family and in recent years in hosting and promoting its obscurantist ideology.

The Saudi-Iran ideological tussle has brought a level of turbulence within the OIC. Iran may pursue a greater role towards assuming the mantle of leadership, but for sectarian reasons this may not fructify.

Yet, it continues to support the one identified pan Islamic cause more energetically than any other nation; the cause of the Palestinians. That gives it a higher moral platform.

To further complicate the dynamics, diluting Saudi power due to economic factors is now leading to other major Islamic powers vying for a more significant role. The most prominent are Turkey and Malaysia.

This is the backdrop to the decision of both nations joining hands in setting up an Islamic summit in Kuala Lumpur outside the ambit of the OIC with Pakistan, Indonesia and Iran among the important Islamic nations also persuaded to attend the same.

Stung by the first overtly visible political and diplomatic effort to upend its leadership, Saudi Arabia used its diplomatic clout to prevail upon Indonesia and Pakistan to pull out of the summit in December.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan and Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman in Islamabad, February 18, 2019. Photograph: Kind courtesy Arab News/Twitter

IMAGE: Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan and Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman in Islamabad, February 18, 2019. Photograph: Kind courtesy Arab News/Twitter

The Saudi-Pakistan special relationship in recent times has seen the Saudis economically bail out Pakistan from the depths of a serious economic crisis Pakistan seems to find no answers to.

The Saudi foreign minister’s rushed visit to Islamabad was a kneejerk response by Saudi Arabia and the rumoured promise of holding an OIC foreign ministers meeting in Islamabad in April with Kashmir on the agenda too was perhaps an act of desperation not thought through.

Saudi Arabia under Prince Mohammad bin Salman is viewing its future far more pragmatically while evolving plans for 2032 as the cut off year by when an economy independent of dwindling energy resources is aimed to be built.

For that it needs engagement with both China and India who are major buyers of its energy resources, without exclusion of either of them.

For over half a decade it has displayed all the ingredients of developing stronger bonds with India and thus took a decidedly neutral view on Kashmir, terming it India’s internal issue. Yet it needs Pakistan for support within the Islamic world.

Thus, a dilemma of sorts exists for the Saudis forcing them to tread a careful path. The decided advantage that the Saudis have is that financially no other country can bail out Pakistan and support to it is also viewed positively by the US for its Afghanistan strategy and by China which too chips in to economically support and exploit Pakistan.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s recent visit to Kuala Lumpur to make up for his absence at the December 2019 Islamic Summit would surely have had Saudi Arabia’s nod. However, the more emphatic denial of any proposal for an OIC foreign ministers meet in Islamabad appears aimed at keeping Pakistan on a leash lest the unpredictable dynamics at such an event turn the tide against Saudi interests.

For India, this as a positive turn and augurs well towards building upon the obvious value that Saudi Arabia and other Gulf nations such as the United Arab Emirates and Oman attach to their Indian relationship.

Opportunities such as the unfortunate passing away of Sultan Qaboos of Oman, a long time well-wisher of India, must be used to express empathy. By not sending a leader of appropriate status for his funeral, such an opportunity was lost besides displaying a lack of sensitivity towards mutual interests.

The Islamic Great Game is unlikely to find any winners for long. In the bargain, Pakistan will find opportunity to exploit situations to embarrass India for which India needs to be diplomatically prepared at all times.

We have not witnessed the end of Pakistani efforts at internationalising Kashmir.


Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (retd) — former general officer commanding of the 15 Corps in the Kashmir valley — is one of India’s most astute commentators on strategic affairs.


Is Govt & Army’s Argument Against Women Commanders ‘Appropriate’?Opinion

At the outset, there is nothing political in this issue as is usually wont to be interpreted when governments argue for or against a landmark case in the Supreme Court. It is deeply social and professional, as it revolves around the question of giving command assignments to women officers (WOs) receiving Permanent Commission (PC) in the Army. It’s a difficult issue for the layman to understand, so it deserves a start from the basics.

The government announced in September 2019 that with effect from April 2020, it was opening PC for women in the Army in all ten Arms/Services into which they are commissioned. Till then, PC for WOs was restricted only to JAG and Education branches. From April 2020, they will also be eligible for the same in Signals, Engineers, Army Aviation, Army Air Defence, Electronics and Mechanical Engineers, Army Service Corps, Army Ordnance Corps and Intelligence, branches in which thus far, women officers received only Short Service Commission (SSC). This does not apply to lady medical officers who have been receiving PC for many years.

Also Read : Indian Army Inducts First Batch of Women in Non-Commissioned Ranks

What Women Officers Are Demanding

PC is a major achievement in the long battle for gender sensitivity and equality, but it throws up some linked functional issues which become sensitive in the progressive efforts to equate male and lady officers. Do remember that women have not yet been commissioned into any of the combat arms which are Armoured Corps, Mechanized Infantry, Infantry and Artillery — which are all involved in physical contact with the enemy with efforts to subjugate through kinetic means. We do not wish to get mired here in the age old controversies of who is and who is not involved in such activity among the arms.

Thus women in combat roles, which some may wish to veer into, has nothing to do with the issue now under discussion.

What the women officers are now asking is that having been granted PC, they should be allowed to take the natural career route which male officers take; that is, being tested in sub-unit command (called criteria command) for eventually assuming the responsibility of the command of a unit, so that they too can make further career progression. Readers would have often heard a common saying that the Indian Army is a ‘command-oriented Army’. That is an important statement in itself.

Also Read : #GoodNews: In a First, the Indian Army Is Recruiting Women Jawans

Permanent Commission for Women Officers

Command responsibility commences right from the time an officer out of the Academy reports to his unit, and at the unit level, finally devolves upon the  Commanding Officer (CO) on whose shoulders rest most execution of tasks.

It’s a revered assignment which must be experienced adequately and be tested if an officer is to aspire for higher command at brigade, division, corps or field army level. Also remember that sub unit command does not devolve the kind of responsibility that a CO of a unit handles, as the buck stops at his level; he is responsible for everything good or bad in his unit, including mistakes or achievements of his sub unit commanders.

The CO’s appointment is tenanted only by those officers who have been cleared for command by a promotion board which meticulously examines performance in command of a sub unit (criteria command).

Now if you have understood the basic difference between command of a unit and that of a sub unit along with their responsibilities, let us progress further. Even before PC came into play, while WOs received only SSC, some did command sub units, based upon their efficiency and capability at the discretion of COs, but they were never considered for the appointment of CO because their service contract terminated before the service level required for a CO. Also, SSC officers, by the terms and conditions of the commission, do not get assignments as CO. However, things have now changed with women officers getting PC in these ten Arms/Services; they will therefore serve 30 years and more.

Also Read : Troops Not Schooled to Accept Women in Command Posts: Govt to SC

Women Officers Must Be Treated As Equals

There are two options for their career management with the changed circumstances which the Army would surely be examining.

First is to treat them akin to male officers, give them criteria command of sub units, test them, hold a promotion board and promote the eligible ones to appointment of CO; that would be a major policy change and that is what is being demanded by WOs.

The Army and the government are both arguing against this option in the Supreme Court, reports of which have appeared in the media.

There is a second option emanating from the existing policy on different ‘command and staff’, and ‘staff only’ streams which are based upon assessed individual capability and cadre restriction at senior levels. The Army cannot stop the career progression of WOs above rank of Lt Col, even with embedded terms and conditions. Legally this would be thrown out at the first instance by a court. For the sake of debate, career progression in ‘staff only’ stream would be tenable if a certain number of higher vacancies are reserved in staff appointments up the chain for WOs. However, do remember that this will open up a Pandora’s Box because male officers in ‘staff only stream’ can be promoted only one rank higher — and that too with very limited chance due to vacancy restriction — the cake as usual going to ‘command and staff’ stream.

Time Has Come for Assigning Command to Women Officers

The very few who are experienced in personnel management issues would agree with me that the time has come for assigning command as CO to WOs, at least in the Services (ASC, AOC & EME), JAG, Education and perhaps even in the Intelligence Corps. It is not as if every WO will meet the stringent criteria which must be exactly the same as it is for male officers; no dilution of standards would be acceptable.

Through my long service I have come across WOs who would meet my confidence to undertake such an onerous responsibility; capability being the only criteria, nothing else.Regarding WOs with PC in the balance arms, that is, Signals, Engineers, Army Aviation, and Army Air Defense, certain experimentation by assigning command to selected WOs in peace locations, must be carried out to determine future policy which will eventually move towards finally granting command in these arms too.

Inapplicable Arguments by the Army

Arguments such as subordinate male soldiers being unwilling to take orders from WOs in command, flies in the face of some very creditable performance by a percentage of WOs. I have personally witnessed WOs as convoy commanders in Kashmir and the Northeast, detachment commanders of plant detachments constructing tracks at the LoC and the like. I found them equal to the task with no insubordination by male soldiers.

The other arguments employed by the Army are inapplicable here. Threats faced in the field are equally applicable to WOs who are not in command. Future women COs would be motivated and mature individuals and would generally be at age levels of 38 and above. Certain non-discriminatory terms and conditions for their assignments in command can always be drawn up in consultation with them to ensure that there is no impingement on effectiveness of their units; that of course remains the bottom line, because unlike all other professions where gender equality is being sought, the Armed Forces are the only ones where life and death, and the safety of the nation, are at stake.

(The writer, a former GOC of the Army’s 15 Corps, is now the Chancellor of Kashmir University. He can be reached at @atahasnain53. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)