Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Defence Related News

Terrorist infiltration in 2018 highest in five years: MHA

Press Trust of India

letterschd@hindustantimes.com

New Delhi : Pakistan-based terrorist groups made 328 bids to sneak into Jammu and Kashmir from across the border in 2018 and were successful in 143 of these attempts, the highest in the last five years, according to the home ministry’s annual report.

The report of the ministry for 2018-19 made available on Friday said 257 terrorists and 91 security personnel were killed in Jammu and Kashmir last year, the highest number of casualties in the state in the last five years.

Thirty-nine civilians were also killed during this period, it said.

As per the report, there were 328 infiltration attempts by Pakistan-based terrorist groups into Jammu and Kashmir from across the border in 2018, of which 143 were successful.

In 2017, there were 419 cross-border infiltration attempts, of which 136 were successful. In 2016, there were 371 infiltration attempts, of which 119 were successful, it said.

A total of 121 infiltration attempts were in 2015, of which 33 were successful. In 2014, there were 222 infiltration attempts, of which 65 were successful, the annual report said.

“The ongoing military in Jammu and Kashmir is intrinsically linked with infiltration from across the border both from the International Border (IB) and the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir,” it said.

A total of 257 terrorists, 91 security personnel and 39 civilians were killed in 614 terror incidents in Jammu and Kashmir in 2018, as per the report.

The casualties of both security personnel and the terrorists and the number of terror incidents in 2018 were highest in the last five years in Jammu and Kashmir, it said.

In 2017, 213 terrorists, 80 security personnel and 40 civilians were killed in 342 terror incidents in the state, the report said.

In 2016, a total of 150 terrorists, 82 security personnel and 15 civilians were killed in 322 terror incidents, while in 2015, 108 terrorists, 39 security personnel and 17 civilians were killed in 208 terror incidents, it said.

A total of 110 terrorists, 47 security personnel and 28 civilians were killed in 222 terror incidents in Jammu and Kashmir in 2014, the report said.


Passage to peace Kartarpur corridor can offer a fresh beginning

PROVIDING a silver lining in the otherwise dark cloud of India-Pakistan relations, the two countries have signed a historic agreement on the Kartarpur corridor that will allow Indian pilgrims to undertake visa-free visit to the shrine of the Sikh religion’s founder Guru Nanak in Pakistan, fulfilling a long-pending wish. People in the two countries, Punjab in particular, have always viewed Partition with a sense of wistfulness. The loss of home and hearth in spite of the linguistic and cultural similarities continues to scar bilateral ties, the willingness to trust held back by a nagging negativity, rooted in the mindless violence of 1947 and subsequent skirmishes. The agreement, however, is  a positive development, showing political will on both sides of the Radcliffe line. Disagreement over visa fee remains, though other modalities have been worked out.

While there are misgivings about separatist groups using the facility to their own advantage, especially in view of Pakistan’s tacit backing to militancy in Punjab, in keeping with its philosophy of ‘bleeding India with a thousand cuts’, it may well offer an opportunity to dispel that notion, depending on how Pakistan handles it. The past is, however, not a positive indicator. Indian High Commission officials have been denied permission to meet the Indian pilgrims, leading to misgivings, but Pakistan has continued to allow the visits. An unconventional Prime Minister in Imran Khan, a cricketer, has not helped, and India will have to keep the safeguards in place, for the Pakistan army has always created a web of lies to justify its predominance over civilian governments.

Guru Nanak preached unity of mankind and symbolised values that have stood the test of time. His 550th birth anniversary will be an occasion to redeem commitment to our secular fabric. The irony is hard to miss. Pakistan, created on the basis of religion, is now trying to find a unifying force in religion. The future will be determined by whether they are able to build on the positivity brought about by this bridge-building.


Kartarpur: Dera Baba Nanak on road to progress

SPEED BREAKER Volatile India-Pakistan ties come in way of border town seeing business boom; this is set to change now

Surjit Singh

surjit.singh@htlive.com

DERA BABA NANAK (GURDASPUR) : The opening of the Kartarpur Corridor next month has catapulted the hitherto sleepy town of Dera Baba Nanak, 65 km from Amritsar, as a port of trans-border pilgrimage, giving a fillip to the local economy and raising hopes of brighter days for the battle-battered border belt.

With India and Pakistan signing the agreement on Thursday to allow 5,000 Indian pilgrims a day to undertake visa-free visit to Gurdwara Darbar Sahib, notwithstanding the chill in bilateral ties over Kashmir, local residents and entrepreneurs, particularly in the hospitality and travel sectors, are seeing the economic spinoff as a godsend.

There is a hitch though given the volatility of Indo-Pak ties. The corridor may have opened up opportunities and led to the tripling of real estate prices but the enthusiasm is yet to translate into land deals in the town that has remained in the shadow of neglect after being the theatre of two Indo-Pak wars in 1965 and 1971. The uncertainty in relations with the neighbouring country is to blame.

ONLY QUERIES, NO DEAL

“People wanting to buy land along the highway have contacted me since I’m in the revenue office. They check the price and seek advice but not a single case of sale of land has come to me so far,” says Kuldeep Singh, the tehsildar of Dera Baba Nanak.

Suba Singh, a farmer who owns 70 acres along the highway near Chandu Nangal village on the town’s outskirts, says, “Every two days, prospective investors come visiting. Some parties are even from Delhi and Mumbai. Most want to open hotels but nothing has been finalised. Both buyer and seller are reluctant. For instance, a landlord sought Rs 80 lakh per acre from a party but a few days later, another party offered him Rs 1.2 crore an acre. The price of the land has not been fixed yet.”

Suba Singh says there are fears that a wall may be built along the highway which would negate the purpose of building hotels there.

“It’s wait and watch. We are waiting to assess the response. We’ll know how much time pilgrims spend in town and if retail traders will benefit. The time for entering and exiting Pakistan through the corridor will be fixed so we don’t know if they stay here or leave. It will take a few months to understand things,” says Sukhdeep Singh Bedi, a descendent of Guru Nanak Dev and social worker.

TRADERS NEED STABILITY

Amritsar-based hotelier Surinder Singh says, “We are interested but there are doubts. Instances of the Samjhauta Express, Delhi-Lahore bus service and Indo-Pak trade being suspended after the tension in Kashmir are concerns. Will the corridor also be affected? Investors are in double mind.”

“A Delhi company wants to set up a tent city for pilgrims but investors are hesitant. They fear the money may go in vain given the situation”, he says.

Perneet Singh Bedi, the president of the local municipal council, says, “People think the atmosphere is cordial for opening the corridor on the occasion of the 550th Parkash Purb of Guru Nanak Dev, but things may get worse due to tension between the two countries. In such a situation, where do we go after investing crores?”

Sukhdeep Singh says, “At this stage, nobody knows how much land is to be acquired. A lot needs to be done as part of the corridor project. For instance, the land will have to be acquired for residential flats for employees of departments such as Customs, Border Security Force, army, intelligence agencies and immigration bureau. The land acquisition for these tasks is pending”.

“Secondly, this town has hardly got 10 such people who have enough to spend on commercial outlets or hotels. Of them, some are not interested or are not cut out for entrepreneurship. Unless an investor comes from outside, the town’s growth is not be possible,” he says.

CITIES TO BENEFIT

“The government has closed both sides of the highway to pave the way for the corridor. So nobody can go on or get off the highway from its sides. The investors have no option other than selecting a site at the point from where the highway starts and roads from Amritsar, Gurdaspur and Batala meet,” says the municipal council president. These cities are 55 km, 35 km and 20 km away from Dera Baba Nanak.

The sangat (pilgrims) visiting Kartarpur are less likely to stay in Dera Baba Nanak due to the online system of seeking permission. The hoteliers in Amritsar, Batala or Gurdaspur are likely to benefit.

He urged the government to open a manual permission application counter at Dera Baba Nanak.

Ashok Manan, who owns a transport firm that runs buses from Amritsar to Dera Baba Nanak, said he is willing to increase the number of buses on the route but it is up to the state government to allot permits.


India needs to amend its nuclear doctrine by Lt Gen Harbhajan Singh (retd)

Lt Gen Harbhajan Singh (retd)
Military Commentator

Our nuclear doctrine suffers from serious infirmities. It only deals with a nuclear conflict scenario. It does not get meshed with territorial security, which is the main Indian concern vis-a-vis China and due to which India went nuclear. India’s strategy has to be to deter/dissuade China from embarking on any large-scale offensive.

India needs to amend its nuclear doctrine

Strategy: To deter China, India needs to include the use of TNWs.

 

India suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of China in the short war of October-November 1962. On October 16, 1964, China carried out its first nuclear test. This added a new dimension to the threat to India’s security and provided the impetus to India for developing nuclear weapons as a means of deterring Chinese aggression. Consequently, India tested its first nuclear device on May 18, 1974.

Pakistan began the process for developing nuclear weapons in January 1972 after losing East Pakistan as a result of the 1971 war. It, perhaps, secretly tested its nuclear devices in China in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Pakistan carried out the first nuclear test openly on May 28, 1998, a few weeks after India’s second nuclear test. Since then, it has made noteworthy strides in the areas of nuclear weaponisation and missiles.

Therefore, it needs to be realised that India developed nuclear weapons primarily to deter China from any military adventure across the Himalayas.India’s nuclear doctrine of the NFU (No First Use) and CMD (Credible Minimum Deterrence) was made public in August 1999. In 2003, the Cabinet Committee on Security debated the 1999 doctrine, but no changes were promulgated. However, it is not essential to publicise a nuclear doctrine. Mere signals resulting in ambiguity can also serve the required purpose, ie information warfare.

India has developed a Nuclear Triad capability (ability to launch nuclear missiles from the air, ground and submarines) in order to survive and retaliate with nuclear weapons against a first use nuclear strike, as part of its CMD doctrine. India also has Agni missiles which have ranges covering territories much beyond China. This prevents China and Pakistan from nuclear-blackmailing India.China is the only other nuclear nation in addition to India that professes to follow the doctrine of NFU. However, Chinese sources have made statements that their NFU commitment is not applicable to the areas which Beijing claims. Also, they have mentioned some red lines, which if crossed, would invite a nuclear attack. In this context, it is relevant to point out that China lays claims to Arunachal Pradesh and certain areas along India’s border with Tibet.

Pakistan’s nuclear doctrine is India-specific and stipulates deterrence by “guaranteeing an immediate massive retaliation by nuclear weapons” against a ground and air attack which crosses certain red lines. To counter India’s Cold Start Doctrine, Pakistan has added the use of TNWs (Tactical Nuclear Weapons) against Indian troops.

India has set up an elaborate nuclear command and control organisation with alternative command post, communications and Triad to absorb the first strike. This makes the Indian doctrine quite potent.

However, our nuclear doctrine suffers from some serious infirmities. The current nuclear doctrine only deals with a nuclear conflict scenario. It does not get meshed with the territorial security of the nation, which is the main Indian concern vis-a-vis China and due to which India went nuclear. China has become much stronger in conventional forces. India’s strategy has to be to deter/dissuade China from embarking on any large-scale offensive. This cannot be achieved by increasing ground and air forces. Also, due to the strategic nexus between China and Pakistan, India will have to keep considerable forces on its western front.

The Indian strategy to deter China must, therefore, include using our comprehensive military potential, including the use of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs).

Escalation leading to MAD scenario

  • India’s doctrine envisages using ‘massive nuclear retaliation’ in case an adversary resorts to first use of any kind of nuclear device, even a TNW.
  • It implies that if Pakistan uses a sub-kiloton nuclear weapon to wipe out an offensive Indian Army division/brigade in the desert of Rajasthan, India would immediately drop a number of strategic nuclear bombs on Pakistan cities and strategic targets. And it is implicit that in return, Pakistan would nuke Delhi, Mumbai, Jodhpur, Chandigarh etc.
  • Whatever the doctrine, in practice, the moment Indian troops are attacked by a TNW, there would be intense diplomatic pressure on India to not retaliate with nuclear weapons. Certainly not with strategic weapons and escalate the situation. The Indian leadership is most likely to succumb to such international pressure. A graduated nuclear response with TNWs is likely to be tolerated, though.
  • Also, in such a scenario, will the Indian political leadership have the courage to bear the consequences of creating a situation for MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction)? This is highly doubtful.
  • In view of the above, such a theoretical nuclear doctrine, which envisages raising the stakes from a tactical to a strategic level suddenly, seems “less of deterrence and more of pretence.”
  • The adversary’s leadership is unlikely to bite it and hence it does not have the required deterrence value.

During the Cold War, the Warsaw Pact Forces had a marked superiority in conventional forces over NATO and, hence, were expected to overrun vital areas in Europe in a short time. America, therefore, deployed thousands of TNWs with a view to deter the superior Soviet-led conventional forces.In due course, it was realised that the use of TNWs in populated areas would result in colossal damage to the European population and so, they were discarded. As far as India is concerned, our area along the border with Tibet, by and large, has very little habitation and the above-mentioned constraint for the use of TNWs there and in the deserts of Rajasthan is, therefore, not relevant.

Keeping in view the superiority of China in conventional forces, the use of TNWs in our own territory, say in Tawang, Walong or Chushul, against any offensive Chinese forces is a credible and cost-effective option. India cannot mount any worthwhile conventional counter-offensive due to constraints posed by the very high altitude terrain and long lines of communications. Feeling gung-ho as a result of exercises is a different kettle of fish as compared to the actual shooting war.

Keeping in view the threat of TNWs from Pakistan, the Indian nuclear doctrine should state that their first use by an adversary will be responded to in kind and with much greater intensity.

As far as diplomacy and world opinion are concerned, the answer is: there is nothing offensive in the proposed doctrine. It is a defensive doctrine to safeguard India’s territorial integrity. The TNWs are planned to be used only in our own territory.

With such a doctrine, India can certainly deter/dissuade China and Pakistan and reduce some Army formations and costly air assets. Thus, it can devote greater financial resources towards economic development and alleviating poverty.

In the context of wars that India is likely to get involved in, talking about MAD seems a mad idea.


RECRUITMENT RALLY Over 3,000 appear for 32 posts in TA

Over 3,000 appear for 32 posts in TA

Candidates at an Army recruitment rally in Jammu on Monday.

Our Correspondent

Jammu, October 21

Over 3,000 youths from Jammu turned up for 32 posts in the Territorial Army’s recruitment rally in the Bari Bramnah area of Jammu on Monday.

Amid complaints of large-scale unemployment in Jammu and Kashmir, the candidates expressed their gratitude to the Army for carrying out the recruitment rally to provide them some sought of livelihood.

The Army’s 157 Infantry Battalion (Territorial Army) (Home and Hearth) (Sikh) has been organising recruitment rally between October 21 and 25 at Bari-Bramnah, Jammu.

On the day one, candidates from RS Pura, Akhnoor, Bishnah and Nagrota tehsils of Jammu district took part in the recruitment rally, whereas candidates from Bari Brahmana, Vijaypur and Ramgarh tehsils of Samba and Teryath, Paoni and Reasi will participate in days to come. There are 32 posts of Soldier (General Duty) and two of Housekeeper.

“We have been witnessing a huge rush of youth willing to join the Army. This is an open recruitment rally for the areas specified in the notification. The candidates will undergo physical fitness tests, medical examination and other procedures during the recruitment rally,” an officer said.

 


The day paradise was lost by Tilak Devasher

Tilak Devasher

It is vital to sensitise people, especially the Kashmiri youth, who may not be aware of the history of the event and of the brutality their forefathers were subjected to at the hands of Pakistan. Silence is no longer an option.

The day paradise was lost

Ultimate Betrayal: The real enemies of the Kashmiris are across the border, for they destroyed the unity of Kashmir and permanently damaged its social ethos.

Tilak Devasher
Member, National Security Advisory Board

October 22, 1947, is perhaps the most critical date in J&K’s history. It was on this date that Pakistan-sponsored tribal ‘raiders’ invaded the state to forcibly annex it to the newly created country. The Maharaja of Kashmir had entered into a standstill agreement with Pakistan on August 12, 1947, under which Pakistan had undertaken not to unilaterally disturb the status quo i.e. continue to treat J&K as an independent state. Pakistan deliberately broke the agreement and invaded an independent state. The raiders, as is well known, indulged in an orgy of looting and violence and were ultimately repulsed by the Indian Army.

While Pakistan failed to forcibly annex the state, it did succeed in appropriating the entire narrative on Kashmir. On the one hand, it managed to mask its violation of the agreement and its 1947 invasion, and on the other, it succeeded in diverting the narrative by claiming that the accession of J&K to India was bogus and the entry of Indian troops in Kashmir on October 27, 1947, was illegal. Such a narrative has been bolstered by Pakistan observing for decades this day as ‘black day’.

Unfortunately, India has conceded this space and the narrative to Pakistan by not contesting it. There is a need to make a substantive push for observing the anniversary of the October 22 invasion as the real ‘black day’ in the history of Kashmir. This will sensitise people, especially the Kashmiri youth, who may not be aware of the history of the event and of the brutality their forefathers were subjected to at the hands of Pakistan. They need to be educated, if not reminded, that this was the day when the entire history of Kashmir was irreversibly distorted, how the princely state became an ‘issue’ and a ‘question’ and how historical facts were twisted to advance the Pakistani agenda. 

PoK author Mohammad Saeed Asad in his book Yaadon ke Zakhm (wounded memories) has collated a series of eyewitness accounts of the tribal invasion, especially in Muzaffarabad and its environs. These accounts are a brutal revelation for those who have forgotten the events or view Kashmir through tinted glasses.

The accounts underline the tolerant and peaceful nature of society in J&K before the tribesmen were unleashed upon the unsuspecting populace. Muzaffarabad had all three religious communities — Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs, with the Muslims being in a majority. All communities lived in harmony and interaction among them was of a very high order. The communities were not just friends, but their contact extended to all aspects of existence, including festivals, marriages and funerals. As one eyewitness put it, the interaction was far more amicable than the relationship among Muslims these days. 

The ransacking of Muzaffarabad by the raiders was comprehensive and devastating. The properties of Hindus and Sikhs were burnt and they were slaughtered. Their bodies lay in their homes or on the street for days. Many were thrown into the river. While they looted, the raiders hardly distinguished between Muslim and non-Muslim property. Thus, Muslim shops were equally ransacked and no Muslim home was spared from this tribal plunder. In places, even the holy Quran was desecrated. All the looted stuff was loaded onto trucks and sent to the Frontier.

According to an eyewitness, there wasn’t a village or hamlet on the way that the raiders didn’t plunder and ravage. While men were slaughtered, they would grab the jewellery belonging to women, irrespective of religion. If any woman dared protest, they would either yank the jewellery off or chop the body part with the jewellery. Many women read the kalma and pleaded for their lives but the raiders took no heed. Many women were taken back to the Frontier and sold to the highest bidder.

In India, Jehangir’s couplet about Kashmir being paradise is famous. Across the border, there is a somewhat comparable saying. Whenever poets, writers and intellectuals crossed the Kohala bridge over the Jhelum and entered J&K, they would instinctively exclaim in Farsi, ‘Man khuda rah deedum aah jabey hijab’ (I have witnessed God here in his full glory, uncovered).

That paradise was ripped apart on October 22, 1947. For the wounds to heal, those Pakistanis responsible for the original sin of the tribal invasion would have to be publicly identified, shamed and tried in the court of time. They are the real enemies of the Kashmiri people. Their action destroyed the unity of Kashmir and permanently damaged its social, religious, cultural and civilisational characteristics.

It is a tragedy of colossal proportions that Pakistan has gone unpunished for its crimes in Kashmir. Worse, it has managed to cloak its evil deeds from public gaze and in a sleight of hand, transferred the blame on to India. It is only when events are organised about what really happened then that the full extent of Pakistan’s culpability for the situation in Kashmir will be known to the people of Kashmir themselves. Silence and apathy are no longer options.

Pakistan had signed a similar standstill agreement with the Khan of Kalat on August 4, 1947, assuring that it would be an independent country. Like in the case of Kashmir, Pakistan broke that agreement, too, in March 1948 and forcibly annexed Kalat. Pakistan’s subsequent history shows a continued disdain for its international commitments, emboldened, no doubt, because it has never been held accountable.

 


The tattered Naga peace accord under lens by Maj-Gen Ashok Mehta (retd)

Maj-Gen Ashok Mehta (retd)

Between the signing of the NFA in August 2015 and now, the NSCN IM has issued statements contradicting the government’s claim that it had accepted the Indian Constitution. On the contrary, it has been saying that it wants a separate Constitution, flag and integration of all contiguous Naga-inhabited areas under Nagalim (Greater Nagaland).

The tattered Naga peace accord under lens

Impasse: The NSCN-IM says that the government is trying to backtrack on its commitment to a solution embedded in the Naga Framework Accord.

Maj-Gen Ashok Mehta (retd)
Defence commentator

Last Saturday, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM), the dominant Naga armed rebel group engaged in the 22-year-old peace process with the Centre, held yet another round of talks, this time presumably with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval on board in New Delhi to break the impasse. The NSCN-IM said the government was trying to backtrack on its commitment to a solution embedded in the Naga Framework Accord of August 3, 2015 by using a group of Nagas who do not represent the Naga people. This critique of the Centre by the NSCN-IM is a significant development unravelling the NFA.

Additionally, the defanging of Article 370 has sown seeds of doubt and uncertainty among some north-eastern states about the government’s commitment to special powers allocated to them. Worse, it has brought the tom-tommed NFA to a cul de sac. After the success of nullifying Article 370, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had ordered special interlocutor RN Ravi to bring to fruition the NFA by October-end. Nagaland was the first state after J&K to be covered by the 13th Amendment of 1962 which granted it special powers in respect of its identity, culture and social practices — almost akin to J&K — under Article 371-A of the Constitution. In 1963, it was granted full statehood.

The report of the Parliamentary Select Committee attached to the Home Ministry of July 2018 laid in the Rajya Sabha stated that the NSCN IM had agreed to a political settlement within the Indian Constitution with special status. Between the signing of the NFA in August 2015 and now, the NSCN-IM has issued several statements contradicting the government’s claim that it had accepted the Indian Constitution. On the contrary, it has been saying that it wants a separate Constitution, flag and integration of all contiguous Naga-inhabited areas under Nagalim (Greater Nagaland). Ravi has articulated that the first two demands — Constitution and flag — were never on offer. But the Nagas have been saying that their merger with the Union of India could never happen. Instead, the Nagas will co-exist as two entities. The Nagas do not accept the Constitution of India, but the Nagas and India will share sovereignty. So, did the government sell a lemon to the country in August 2015?

On August 24, 2019, NSCN-IM Chairman Q Tuccu and General Secretary Muivah wrote a letter to Modi, stating that there cannot be an honourable solution to the Naga peace process without a separate flag and Constitution, two symbols of special status that were first to go in J&K. Muivah said that the Centre had misinterpreted the term ‘inclusive’ in the NFA, adding that it does not mean the Nagas will be included in the Union of India. ‘We have never been in the Union of India and we will never be,’ the Nagas are saying. So close to a solution and yet so far.

A round of talks was held on August 1 at NSCN-IM headquarters at Mount Hebron which apparently did not go well and broke up in discord. This was immediately after Ravi was promoted to Governor of Nagaland. The Naga Army of NSCN-IM which is technically confined to Mount Hebron was involved in at least five cases of armed clashes and confrontation with security forces this year. Ravi has claimed that all substantive issues in the NFA have been resolved — nothing is left — and assured the Nagas that Article 371 A, which is a solemn commitment and not impermanent like Article 370, will not be repealed. He explained that there is no similarity between Articles 370 and 371 A, adding that the Centre is trying to make it more than 371 A and there is no question of diluting it. Ravi said the intended solution recognises the Nagas’ unique history and the settlement is on the basis of power-sharing and peaceful co-existence. He asserted that the Centre has accepted the integration of Naga areas, adding the red herring that it is the legitimate right of the Naga people to pursue and achieve integration through democratic and political process. 

The government might allow a pan-Naga Assembly if it is restricted to culture, religion and tribal practices, after the BJP-ruled states like Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam, where the Nagas reside, show the green flag. Craftily, Ravi has also been negotiating with seven other former Naga rebel outfits with which he signed an agreement in November 2017 which has upset the NSCN-IM which claims to be the sole representative of all Naga people.

Last month, Home Minister Amit Shah, attending the North Eastern Council meeting said that Articles 371 A to G will not be touched. Sikkim, covered by Article 371 F, was also worried and the new state government has decided to support the BJP at the Centre. The Parliament cannot legislate to alter special status granted to states covered by Article 371 without the concurrence of the Legislative Assembly, a constitutional imperative the Centre fraudulently overcame in the case of the J&K. Still, people in the North-East are restive after the introduction of the National Register of Citizens (NRC). Chief Minister of Nagaland Neiphieu Rio said at the NEC that the Centre should act north-east, before acting east.

The biggest gainer of the imbroglio of NFA, in a sense, is its mastermind and interlocutor Ravi who was Special Director IB in 2012, then chairman JIC before he was elevated to Deputy National Security Adviser, followed by the Governor Nagaland. The Americans would describe a person of his Sputnik-like rise as a ‘water-walker’. He is now the constitutional head of a state and his added role as negotiator in talks with the Naga people would be questionable. More questionable is the fate of the NFA: more fiction than fact? Or, so close and yet so far? The NFA has become make-believe.

 


Knowing Central Armed Police Forces

Knowing Central Armed Police Forces

There are seven main divisions of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF): Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), Assam Rifles (AR), National Security Guard (NSG) and Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). Of these, recruitment to first five is done by the UPSC through Central Armed Police Forces (ACs) Examination. Let’s know about these five forces in detail.

Border Security Force

The Border Security Force (BSF) is the border defence organisation of India, alias first line of defence. Established on December 1, 1965, it was raised in the wake of the Indo-Pakistan War. The main role of the BSF is to keep a watch over international borders against intrusion during peacetime and preventing transnational crime. It guards the Indian borders shared with Pakistan and Bangladesh and is deployed both on the International Border (IB) and Line of Control (LoC).

Strength: The BSF has grown 186 battalions with a sanctioned strength of 257,363 personnel including an expanding air wing, marine wing, an artillery regiment, and commando units.

Central IndustrialSecurity Force

Raised in 1969 after the recommendations of Justice B Mukherji, its role is to monitor the Central Government industrial complexes. However, the CISF is no longer a PSU-centric organisation. Instead, it has become a premier multi-skilled security agency of the country, mandated to provide security to major critical infrastructure installations of the country. It is currently providing security cover to nuclear installations, space establishments, airports, seaports, power plants, sensitive government buildings and many heritage monuments. A unique feature associated with CISF is that it has a fire wing, which provides assistance during major fire outbreaks.

Strength: Its current active strength is 1,48,371 personnel. In April 2017, the government raised the sanctioned strength from 145,000 to 180,000 personnel.

Indo-Tibetan Border Police

Raised on October 24, 1962, in the wake of Sino-India War, the ITBP personnel monitor the borders and also stop smuggling and illegal immigration. The ITBP also has a water wing, which guards the riverine borders of the Himalayan region which includes Pangong Lake, the Brahmaputra region in Arunachal Pradesh, and the Indus in Jammu and Kashmir.

Strength: The ITBP, which started with four battalions, has since restructuring in 1978 has undergone expansion to a force of 60 Battalions with 15 Sectors and 5 Frontiers as of 2018 with a sanctioned strength of 89,432.

Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)

Established in 1963, the SSB guards the Indo-Nepal and Indo-Bhutan borders. It was only in 2014 that the government approved the recruitment of women as combat officers in SSB. Formerly known as the Special Service Bureau, their job is to control anti-national activities.

Strength: As of 2017, it has 76,337 active personnel in 73 battalions.

Central Reserve Police Force

Established in 1939, its main role is to assist the state police or UT police in maintaining law and order. It is deployed in every part of the country, actively looking after the internal security. The CRPF contingents are also being deployed in the UN missions. CRPF also plays a major role during the General Election. The Mahila Battalion (88th Battalion of CRPF) commissioned on March 30, 1986, is the world’s first paramilitary force comprised entirely of women. CRPF is further bifurcated into two units: Rapid Action Force (RAF) and Commando Battalion for Resolute Action (COBRA)

Strength: With 239 battalions and various other establishments, the CRPF is considered India’s largest paramilitary force and has a sanctioned strength of more than 3,00,000 personnel as of 2017.


Militants trying to infiltrate from other routes: Lt Gen Ranbir Singh

Militants trying to infiltrate from other routes: Lt Gen Ranbir Singh

Lt Gen Ranbir Singh

Amir Karim Tantray

Tribune News Service

Bhaderwah (Doda), October 11

Infiltration from the Pakistani side is not confined to the Line of Control (LoC) and International Border (IB) in Jammu and Kashmir. The militants are now trying to infiltrate through other borders outside the state. This was disclosed by Northern Command chief, Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, today during an interaction with the media after inaugurating ‘Sangam’ youth festival at the Bhaderwah campus of the University of Jammu (JU) here.

“There have been several reports regarding infiltration by terrorists into J&K. However, as far as the counter-infiltration grid is concerned, it is very strong and we are able to thwart the infiltration bids at the LoC itself. It is a multi-tier grid and if militants try to sneak in by breaching the first grid, the second grid will catch them. But if they manage to breach the second grid also, they are eliminated by other grids,” he said.

“There are reports that infiltration is taking place but since the grid is strong on the LoC, we have reports that infiltration is taking place from other borders and from there onwards, they try to come to J&K through Lakhanpur and other areas. But be assured that we will be able to stop the infiltration in the best possible manner,” he added.

The Army commander said terror camps and launching pads inside Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) were active and around 500 terrorists were always present there. “In J&K, 200 to 300 terrorists are active and around 500 terrorists are present in launching pads and terror camps across the LoC. But the number is approximate and keeps changing,” he said.

He said militants in the state were facing a shortage of weapons. “It is the reason they are attacking police stations and snatching rifles from SPOs,” he said.

Speaking on the Kashmir valley, he said the situation was improving since the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A.

 


We begin a new chapter in our ties: PM Modi to Xi

We begin a new chapter in our ties: PM Modi to Xi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the luxury Taj resort Fisherman’s Cove in Mamallapuram. PTI

Sandeep Dikshit
Tribune News Service
Mamallapuram, October 12

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday said that their second informal summit here heralds the start of a new era in India-China relations. The ‘Chennai vision’, he hoped, would build on the first informal summit between India and China last year in Wuhan that had given fresh stability and momentum in bilateral relations.

Strategic communication between the two countries has led to increased stability, he underlined in his opening remarks at the beginning of delegation-level talks. PM Modi and XiJinpinghave met 17 times at structured summits and two informal summits, including the one in Mamallapuram. He recalled that at the Wuhan meeting, the two leaders had decided not to allow differences to fester into disputes.

PM Modi began the second day of the informal summit by “plogging’’ on the beach behind his luxury hotel. He was televised picking up trash from the beach while exercising and taking in the scenery. With no one present on the entire beach and a couple of TV cameras for company, the PM was dressed in a black tracksuit and picked up the trash with bare hands.

Later he paced in the foyer of the beach resort while waiting for Xi to arrive and then sat next to the driver in a battery-operated vehicle while XI and the interpreters sat behind him as they drove down to a retreat at the resort for nearly 45 minutes of one-to-one talks, picking up the threads from Friday’s five hours of discussions between them, including at a sumptuous dinner which stretched late into the night.

The Chinese President will leave for Nepal after wrapping up talks with PM Modi. He had met Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, invited at China’s request, two days before leaving for India.

Xi, however, was circumspect in his opening remarks. “I may follow up on the proposals and issues discussed yesterday. I will make some responses. I’m sure that our discussions today will further bring forward our relations,’’ he observed.

The leaders then broke for delegation-level talks. Besides PM Modi, the Indian side included National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale.

Xi was more forthcoming on the Indian hospitality, stating that he was “really overwhelmed’’ and the trip to South India was a memorable experience for me and us [the delegation].’’

The two leaders had met on Friday evening and toured the temples of Mamallapuram that was followed by a cultural programme and dinner. In a late night briefing, Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale said the two leaders discussed bilateral issues and their respective national visions. Today, he said, they will touch on regional and international issues.