Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

Chinese troops yet to return to pre-April positions, Army says LAC disengagement ‘intricate’

File image of Indian soldiers in Ladakh | By special arrangement

New Delhi: India and China have agreed to discuss “complete disengagement” along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Eastern Ladakh, the Army said Thursday.

This comes after the fourth round of talks between the corps commanders of India and China Tuesday, which went on for 15 hours at Chushul.

Multiple meetings were held Wednesday to discuss the outcome of the talks, including by the government’s high-powered China Study Group (CSG) — a panel comprising top civil servants, armed forces and intelligence personnel — that serves as policy adviser to the executive on China.

The meeting was attended by Army Chief General M.M. Naravane and 14 Corps Commander Lt. Gen. Harinder Singh, who has been representing India at all the Corps Commander-level meetings held with South Xinjiang Military District, Major General Lin Liu since 6 June.


Also read: Army plans to buy 350 helicopters over 10 years to modernise its Aviation Corps


‘Intricate, require constant verification’

The Army said in the statement: “The engagement was consistent with the consensus reached between the Special Representatives of India and China earlier, on 5 July, to discuss complete disengagement.”

It added, “The Senior Commanders reviewed the  progress on implementation of the first phase of disengagement and discussed further steps to ensure complete disengagement.”

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

While the Army said the two sides remain committed to the objective of complete disengagement, it added the process would be “intricate and would require constant verification”.

India and China have been engaged in discussions since June through established military and diplomatic channels to address the prevailing situation along the LAC.

The two sides are taking it forward through regular meetings at diplomatic and military levels, the Army said.

According to sources, a review of the ongoing pulling back of troops at Galwan Valley, Hot Springs area and Gogra Post was carried out and the further disengagement at Finger 4 of Pangong Tso was discussed Tuesday.

Pullback of troops have taken place

As reported by ThePrint Wednesday, the disengagement process has been slow and is likely to last several months through the winter.

“For Finger 4 to 8, the claim lines are being discussed further and the future discussions, as decided in the last corps commanders talks, would be on them,” a defence source told ThePrint.

“The current deployment will be withdrawn in a phased manner, and timelines and modalities for various patrol points, such as PP-14, are being worked out,” the source added.

That is because, the source said, while there has been a pullback of troops from most areas, they are yet to return to pre-April positions.

For instance, Indian troops are still not going to certain patrol points as they used to go earlier.

Sources had earlier said while the Chinese troops have retreated from Indian side of the LAC at various locations, the Chinese build-up remains, which is much ahead of their peacetime locations pre-April.

However, there has not been a tangible pullback from Finger 4 at Pangong Tso and Depsang Plains, they said.

Instructions have been given to the troops to avoid any engagement, and ensure adequate distancing between troops on ground and in the lake.

Another source said certain ad hoc or temporary patrol points are being worked out so the troops do not go beyond them.

“Once identified on ground, it will ensure that there is no physical clash of troops,” the source said.

The key takeaways, sources said, were that both countries want resolution in a peaceful manner and want to avoid clashes, which may escalate the situation.


Also read: No additional troops or new tents — what India, China discussed at corps commanders’ meet

 

 


ndian Army will need another division in Ladakh to keep China out, says retd Lt Gen Panag

Lt Gen Panag and his daughter Gul Panag at the launch of his book, The Indian Army, Reminiscences, Reforms and Romance, on ThePrint's e-venue Soft Cover | ThePrint.

Lt Gen Panag and his daughter Gul Panag at the launch of his book, The Indian Army, Reminiscences, Reforms and Romance, on ThePrint’s e-venue Soft Cover | ThePrint.
New Delhi: India will have to deploy another troop division to safeguard the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and prevent China from coming back once disengagement is complete in Eastern Ladakh, Lt Gen H.S. Panag (retd) said.

The former Northern Army commander said additional troops from the Leh-based 14 Corps should be deployed here.

The Army’s 14 Corps has two divisions under it — one which looks after Siachen and the other which is posted along the Line of Actual Control with China.

http://

Each division has about 10,000-12,000 men with artillery and other elements.

Panag also said that in case of a war, the strategic Darbuk-Shyokh-Daulat Beg Oldie (DSDBO) road would be rendered non-operational and even the airfield there would come under Chinese missile attacks.

He was speaking during an interaction for the launch of his book, The Indian Army, Reminiscences, Reforms and Romance, on ThePrint’s e-venue Soft Cover.

Panag said China has been aggressive along the LAC in Ladakh because it believed New Delhi was building all-weather roads through the same route that the Indian Army used in 1962 to reach Galwan Valley, thereby threatening Aksai Chin.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

“While the overall intent of China is to have hegemony over India, make India play the younger brother kind of the role … The Chinese are very sensitive to threats to Aksai Chin,” he said, adding that even in 1962, the discussions of the Chinese politburo centred around India’s plans against China.

“The two reasons cited (back then) was that India wanted Tibet’s freedom, in fact to usurp Tibet, and second was that through the forward policy we are trying to gain more Chinese territory,” he said. “This was the main theme in the politburo discussions.”


Also read: China believes India wants Aksai Chin back. PLA has likely secured 40-60 sq km in Ladakh


Strategic DBO sector wouldn’t count in a war

Talking about the strategic DSDBO road, Panag said the DBO sector has its own inherent weaknesses and there is no point in saying that we have an airfield there.

It would be rendered non-operational for India because the Chinese can easily observe the road from within their own side of the LAC if they sit on the heights. The same also applies to the Advance Landing Ground in DBO, which is less than 15 km from the LAC.

This means that it can be easily targeted by rockets which will render the airfield useless, Panag said.

“The DBO road cannot be used in operations because the Chinese have to just get on to the heights on their top,” he said. “Even in their own side of the LAC, they can observe the road and destroy the bridges and others with their rocket force.”

The airfield is just 15-20 km from the LAC, he said, putting it in the direct artillery range. “It will be rendered useless on the very first day of operations.”

Panag added that one should not talk about taking back lost territory without developing capability, an apparent reference to statements by BJP leaders, including Home Minister Amit Shah, who said that India will take Aksai Chin back.

‘Reasons behind the Chinese moves’

Explaining the strategic reasons behind the Chinese moves, Panag said the DBO is the western approach to Aksai Chin and Kongka La is the southern approach.

“From the area of Hot Springs and Gogra Post, there are two routes,” he explained. “One goes to the east to the Kongka La and from there to almost the eastern edge of the Aksai Chin. There is another route that goes from Hot Spring northwards. This route goes to the source of the Galwan river.”

Giving a historical perspective, he added, “What people don’t realise is that in 1962 when we established the Galwan Post, it was 80 km upstream. And the route that we took was from Hot Springs.

“So from Hot Springs we approached the source of the Galwan river, a little below it and established a post. We actually went and established the post in 1962 behind the Chinese. The direct access to Aksai Chin is from DBO and Galwan and hence the Chinese are very sensitive”.

He said the Chinese observed that India has built the DBO road and is making one in the Hot Springs area northwards, which would have taken Indians to the source of the Galwan river just like in 1962.

“What would be the end result? We will threaten the Galwan river deployment of the Chinese. We will once again get behind it,” he said. “Then the whole of Galwan Valley will be eventually taken by India.”

He said the fact that India was building access to the Galwan river from both sides — Hot Springs and confluence of the Shyok and Galwan — is the real reason why the Chinese have taken action.

He also said the Pangong Tso is being eyed by China because there is another route through Sirijap Post in the area to Aksai Chin.


Also read: Rifles, missiles, ammunition, drones — armed forces on shopping spree amid LAC tensions


China in a tight spot Confrontational politics with US leading to economic difficulties and isolation

China in a tight spot

Under strain: Downslide in relations with America has alarmed China’s leaders.

Jayadeva Ranade

President, Centre for China Analysis & Strategy

China’s leaders are getting increasingly ‘alarmed’ at the rapidly deteriorating Sino-US relations. The Editor-in-Chief of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-owned Global Times, Hu Xijin aptly encapsulated these fears on his Weibo account in May when he said: “Honestly, America today won’t back off before crippling China!”

Many Chinese intellectuals, academics and strategists have warned Chinese President Xi Jinping since 2017 that discarding Deng Xiaoping’s policy of “lie low, bide your time” was premature and that his assertive, and often confrontational, foreign policy, especially with the United States, will lead to economic difficulties and China’s isolation. The coronavirus pandemic precipitated matters generating a huge surge in global anti-China sentiment. The Chinese Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), a think-tank of China’s Ministry of State Security (MoSS), reportedly warned Xi Jinping and the Politburo this April that Beijing faces a wave of anti-China sentiment led by the US and needs to be prepared in a worst case scenario for armed confrontation between the two global powers. It said the US also aimed to undercut the CCP by undermining public confidence.

Higher echelon CCP cadres are, meanwhile, preparing for a sharp escalation in Sino-US tensions. Their thinking is reflected to some extent in a paper by Zhou Li, former Deputy Minister in the CCP Central Committee’s (CC) powerful International Liaison Department and presently senior researcher at the Chongyang Institute of Financial Research of Renmin University and Director of the China-Russia Humanities Exchange Research Centre. It was published on June 29, by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Acknowledging Xi Jinping’s leadership, Zhou Li observed that the pandemic had significantly increased instability and uncertainty and added new difficulties and challenges to economic and social development and resumption of production globally.

Stressing the importance of ideological preparations, Zhou Li listed six measures that China should take to respond to the changes in the international environment. He said China must prepare for “full escalation of the struggle” in Sino-US relations. Enumerating the string of punitive actions taken by the Trump Administration, he anticipated that many more would follow and forecast that ‘decoupling’ is ultimately inevitable. He said the ‘difficulties and challenges China will face will be unprecedentedly complex and unprecedentedly severe’ as the “US ruling authorities continue to impose progressive and omni-directional, multi-disciplinary crackdowns”. He cautioned that it is especially necessary to guard against the US pursuing claims against China.

In a similar vein, he warned of the economic difficulties confronting China and recommended that it accelerate efforts to get rid of the hegemony of the dollar and internationalise and decouple the renminbi from the dollar as the US’s international monopoly on the dollar would gravely threaten China’s next steps. He identified two problems: the diminishing value of US dollar assets as the US Administration prints more dollar bills, and US control over the Global Interbank Financial Telecommunications Association

(SWIFT). The latter could adversely affect monetary transactions with China’s energy suppliers. Pointing out that ‘shutdowns’ and ‘closures of cities’ have resulted in a sharp decline in the demand for intermediate and consumer products, he said China needs to cope with the disruption of industrial and supply chains. Its foreign trade export enterprises have greatly reduced orders, production of upstream and downstream enterprises has stalled and international transportation logistics have been disrupted. Together with the unavailability of raw materials and unreliability in deliveries, this has exerted tremendous pressure on growth and employment. He recommended that China promote infrastructure projects within and compete and cooperate internationally under the ‘new situation’.

Zhou Li anticipated that global food production will drop 30% this year and be further impacted by disruptions in supply, demand and circulation caused by the pandemic. Asserting that China must prepare for the crisis, he said major food-producing countries face large-scale harvest failure due to various factors. Prices of major grains like corn, soybeans and wheat have risen by 30% to 50%, exacerbated by international speculation. Many countries have suspended exports or formulated quotas and strengthened controls on the grain market. He said the food crisis will cause social unrest in more countries. China, as the world’s largest importer of soybeans, will be directly affected and must step up food production. It should increase policy support and subsidies for grain production, improve the grain reserve control system and promote international cooperation in agriculture.

Pointing to the many uncertainties about the development of a vaccine and whether the pandemic can be effectively controlled, he recommended that China remain fully mobilised with reserves of anti-epidemic material, medical support etc. It must revamp the public health emergency management and treatment systems and clean up and reorganise food wholesale markets in large and medium-sized cities to eliminate possible sources of infection.

Finally, he anticipated the resurgence of international terrorism and said China must prepare for it as extremist forces turn to the Internet to promote Islamic extreme religious ideas, anti-China speeches to incite hatred, instigate and plan terrorist and biochemical attacks. Some forces, he claimed, actually cooperated with the US to stigmatise China on the source of the virus and discredit it on issues concerning Xinjiang. Zhou Li suggested that China strengthen international counter-terrorism cooperation, especially with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, ASEAN Regional Forum, and the ‘Global Counter-Terrorism Forum’.

Zhou Li’s paper indicates that growing strains in Sino-US relations have put China under considerable economic pressure. This has the potential to fan popular dissatisfaction denting Xi Jinping’s image and raise questions about the CCP’s legitimacy.


Army Chief reviews ops in border districts Visits formations of Vajra Corps in Amritsar, Ferozepur

Army Chief reviews ops in border districts

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, July 14

Chief of Army Staff Gen MM Naravane today visited formations of the Vajra Corps in Amritsar and Ferozepur and reviewed the operational preparedness along the western border.

During the visit, the Army Chief was accompanied by Lt Gen RP Singh, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command. They were briefed on the operational environment and security situation by Lt Gen Sanjeev Sharma, GOC, Vajra Corps, and the GOCs of Panther and Golden Arrow Divisions.

General Naravane interacted with the troops and lauded them for their high morale and motivation. He also awarded Commendation Cards to individuals for their bravery and devotion to duty.

The Army Chief also commended the efforts of the formations in the ongoing fight against the Covid-19 pandemic and also exhorted all ranks to maintain focus on operational preparedness at all times.

 


Armed forces get special powers for urgent purchases worth Rs 300 crore

Armed forces get special powers for urgent purchases worth Rs 300 crore

The decision will shrink the procurement timelines and ensure placement of orders within six months. File photo

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, July 15

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) has delegated powers to armed forces for progressing urgent capital acquisition up to Rs 300 crore to meet immediate operational requirements of the armed forces.

The decision was taken at the DAC meeting chaired by the Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in New Delhi on Wednesday. An official statement said the decision was taken considering the security environment prevailing along the Northern Borders and the need to strengthen the Armed Forces.

The statement further stated that the decision will shrink the procurement timelines and ensure placement of orders within six months and commencement of deliveries within one year.

Earlier, this month the DAC had accorded approval for capital acquisitions of various platforms and equipment worth Rs 38,900 crore approximately. Focused on indigenous design and development, these approvals included acquisitions amounting to Rs 31,130 crore from the Indian industry.

Also, addressing the long felt need of the Indian Air Force to increase its fighter squadrons, the DAC had also approved the proposal for procurement of 21 MIG-29 fighter aircraft and upgrade of existing 59 Mig-29 aircraft and procurement of 12 additional Su-30 MKI fighters.

While the MIG 29 procurement from Russia is estimated to cost Rs 7,418 crore, the Su-30 MKI will be procured from HAL at an estimated cost of Rs 10,730 crore.


Gujarat woman cop who took on minister’s son says she ‘resigned’ as seniors didn’t support her

Gujarat woman cop who took on minister's son says she ‘resigned’ as seniors didn’t support her

Surat, July 16

Woman police constable Sunita Yadav, who had a confrontation with a minister’s son over lockdown violation which led to his arrest here in Gujarat, claimed she has resigned from service.

Prakash Kanani, the son of Gujarat Minister of State for Health Kumar Kanani, and his two friends were arrested on Sunday for allegedly violating the lockdown and night curfew orders in Surat, a COVID-19 hotspot, a senior police official earlier said.

Also read: Support pours in for Gujarat woman cop who “took on” minister’s son

Yadav, who is being hailed on social media for taking action against the minister’s son, told news channels on Wednesday that she had put in her papers.

“I have resigned because I did not receive support from my superior officers. I was only doing my duty as a constable. It’s the fault of our system that these people (like the minister’s son) think they are VVIPs (very very important persons),” she said.

However, a senior police official here denied that she has resigned.

“She has not given her resignation. The inquiry is still on and technically she cannot resign at this juncture,” Surat Police Commissioner R B Brahmbhatt said.

Yadav’s action had led to the registration of an FIR and arrest of Prakash Kanani and two of his friends for alleged violation of lockdown and curfew norms in Surat city.

The arrests came after a video of a heated exchange between them and Yadav, who pulled up the trio for violation of curfew, surfaced on social media. The trio was later released on bail.

Since the incident, Yadav is being hailed on social media.

While some social media users called her “Lady Singham” (referring to the tough cop in the Hindi film “Singham”), some suggested she contest the 2022 state Assembly polls against Kumar Kanani, who represents Varachha constituency in Surat district.

#i_support_sunita_yadav” began to trend on Twitter after the news of the confrontation spread. PTI

 


India and China remain committed to complete disengagement: Officials on Sino-India military talks

India and China remain committed to complete disengagement: Officials on Sino-India military talks

run Joshi

Tribune News Service

Jammu, July 16

The Indian army on Thursday confirmed that there would be more military and diplomatic-level meetings between India and China to ensure complete disengagement to draw curtains on the standoff once and for all in the near future.

It was the officially acknowledged outcome of the talks held at Commander-level that began on Tuesday morning and concluded in the early hours of Wednesday.

An official statement released by the Army on Thursday while referring to the commander-level meetings in Chushul on the Indian side of the Line of Actual Control — the fourth such round of talks between the Corps Commanders of India and China of their respective regions facing each other, said: “The Senior Commanders reviewed the progress on the implementation of the first phase of disengagement and discussed further steps to ensure complete disengagement.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying, on Wednesday, had said: “The Chinese and the Indian border troops held the fourth round of commander-level talks on July 14. Building on the common understanding reached at the previous three rounds of commander-level talks and corresponding implementation work, the two sides achieved progress in further disengagement between the border troops as well as easing the situation at the western sector of the China-India boundary.”

We hoped that India would work with China to implement our consensus with concrete actions and jointly safeguard peace and tranquillity in the border areas, Chunying added.

This meeting was a sequel to the July 5 deliberations between the special representatives. This meeting on the border question, in which the two sides had agreed to go in for complete disengagement at the LAC, “The two sides remain committed to the objective of complete disengagement. This process is intricate and requires constant verification. They are taking it forward through regular meetings at a diplomatic and military level,” the officials said.

There is a standoff between the Indian and Chinese troops at the LAC since the first week of May.

“The engagement was consistent with the consensus reached between the Special Representatives of India and China earlier, on July 5 to discuss complete disengagement,” officials said on the Sino-India military talks.


Neither East, Nor West, Only China | Opinion

Iran’s proposed long-term alignment with China has domestic opponents, who fear the loss of sovereignty

Iran’s proposed long-term alignment with China has domestic opponents, who fear the loss of sovereignty(AP)

“Neither East, nor West” was Ayatollah Khomeini’s slogan for the reconstruction of a post-revolution Iran. This no longer seems to hold in Tehran, if fresh reports of a wide-ranging strategic pact between Iran and China are any indication. Though neither side has officially confirmed details, the Iranian cabinet has signed off on an agreement that has been in the works since President Xi Jinping’s visit to Tehran in January 2016.

Even if the leaked details are not yet agreed upon, they reveal a direction and scope that should cause major concern to India. Under a 25-year pact, China will invest $400 billion in Iran’s petroleum sector as well as its core infrastructure — banking, telecom, ports, airports, high-speed railways, metro and free-trade zones. Iran will become a crucial pivot of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), linking China to Europe. A military dimension envisages joint military exercises, joint training, joint research and development of weapons. China will get assured supplies of Iranian oil, gas and petroleum products at highly discounted prices.

Iran moving closer to China should not come as a surprise. United States (US) President Donald Trump, on a collision course with Iran, walked out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 between Iran and P5+1 (Germany) and the European Union. The plan had the potential of gradually closing Iran’s nuclear weapons window and reviving its economy through lifting sanctions and de-freezing its assets. Instead, Trump again imposed crippling sanctions and the European signatories — Germany, France and the United Kingdom (UK) — though unhappy with the US withdrawal, showed timid resolve. Iran’s economy, based on petroleum exports, has contracted severely; investments have dried up for fear of sanctions; and the pandemic has taken a heavy toll. Iran clearly needs an economic lifeline as well as international support to counter the US-Israel axis. China is willing to provide both, and in a larger strategic landscape, the two can align interests with Russia. As proof of its intent, and perhaps an indication of the coming pact, China recently opposed US efforts in the United Nations Security Council to extend an arms embargo on Iran and, on July 14, reiterated its support for JCPOA.

However, this proposed long-term alignment with China has its opponents. Former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has led the criticism, and, oddly, found support from Prince Reza Pahlavi, the late Shah’s son; an example of a revolutionary mindset combining with a deep sense of Persian superiority. There are fears that Iran’s valuable natural resources will be mortgaged to an untrustworthy partner. Religious hardliners point to China’s repression of the Uighur Muslims. The Majlis — the Iranian parliament — is now dominated by conservatives; most reformist candidates were disqualified by the regime as it circled the wagons in the face of rising public discontent. These conservative members are likely to react strongly to any suggestion of ceding sovereignty to China for economic gains when the pact is put to them. The Supreme Leader, however, supports the proposed deal. This, combined with the attraction of economic prosperity, makes it difficult to say where this needle will stop.

All of this, however, is only cold comfort to India. China’s increased political and economic influence on Tehran can squeeze us on several fronts.

First, Tehran has watched our growing proximity to the US and Israel with a resentful sullenness. The cutting of oil imports and delays in project implementation have further shown the limits of the bilateral relationship; “civilisational links” can only take us only so far and no more. Iran’s pact with China will strengthen the perception that we are in “the other camp”. Given our energy dependence and large diaspora, great power rivalry would not be our preferred game in West Asia.

Second, China’s influence will facilitate better relations between Iran and Pakistan, already evident in the conciliatory attitude shown by Pakistan to militant attacks from across the border in Balochistan. The two could also narrow their differences on Afghanistan, with a direct impact on India’s interests.

Third, Chinese investment in ports and railways can hamper India’s plans to get access to Central Asia and beyond through Iran. The report that India will no longer be part of the Chabahar-Zahidan railway project foreshadows this scenario. Iran’s ambassador in Islamabad has spoken of a “golden ring” of China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan and Turkey and of a western arm to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)+ that would link Gwadar and Chabahar to China by rail through Pakistan. Further, our own economic limitations and the shadow of US sanctions will make it difficult for Indian companies to compete in Iran, particularly if the hundred proposed projects are aligned to a Chinese economic paradigm.

Fourth, even if the Chinese do not get a major slice of Chabahar, they are keen to participate in the development of Bandar-e-Jask, the port outside the Straits of Hormuz. Iran envisages Jask as its main oil-loading point in the near future; it can then close the Straits without harming its own exports. In a worst-case scenario, Jask could become another Chinese dual-use port and with Gwadar and Djibouti threaten India’s energy and maritime security in the Arabian Sea.

All of this may not happen, but we cannot afford to wait for the Majlis to kill this deal, or for Joe Biden to become US president and wean Iran away from China. Our interests are immediate: A strong outreach to Iran with expedited work on Chabahar and its integration into the North-South Transport Corridor as well as a vigorous follow-up on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s successful 2015 Central Asian visit would be timely initiatives to consider.


‘Disengagement an intricate process, needs constant verification’: Army

The focus of the current round of military talks is to hammer out a consensus on easing tensions between the two armies in the Finger Area and Depsang plains as well as pulling back weapons and equipment from friction points in other sectors.

The government’s high-powered China Study Group (CSG) on Wednesday reviewed the latest developments in eastern Ladakh, with focus on the next stage of disengagement between the Indian and Chinese armies following the 14-hour meeting between senior military commanders.

The focus of the current round of military talks is to hammer out a consensus on easing tensions between the two armies in the Finger Area and Depsang plains as well as pulling back weapons and equipment from friction points in other sectors.(PTI)

India and China remain committed to “complete disengagement” which is an “intricate process” and “requires constant verification”, the Indian Army said in a statement on Thursday, two days after senior military commanders from both sides met at Chushul to discuss the road map for reducing tensions along the contested Line of Actual Control (LAC).

“The senior commanders reviewed the progress on implementation of the first phase of disengagement and discussed further steps to ensure complete disengagement,” army spokesperson Colonel Aman Anand said.

The government’s high-powered China Study Group (CSG) on Wednesday reviewed the latest developments in eastern Ladakh, with focus on the next stage of disengagement between the Indian and Chinese armies following the 14-hour meeting between senior military commanders.

“The two sides remain committed to the objective of complete disengagement. This process is intricate and requires constant verification. They are taking it forward through regular meetings at diplomatic and military level,” Anand said in the statement. He said India and China have been engaged in discussions through established military and diplomatic channels to address the prevailing situation along the LAC.

On the fourth meeting between the senior commanders on July 14, he said the engagement was consistent with the consensus reached between the Special Representatives of India and China on July 5 to discuss complete disengagement.

The CSG, which is the apex policy advisor to the government on China, on Wednesday evaluated the proposals and counter-proposals discussed at the corps commander-level talks before charting out the course for the next round of disengagement that is expected to begin in the Finger Area near Pangong Tso.

The focus of the current round of military talks is to hammer out a consensus on easing tensions between the two armies in the Finger Area and Depsang plains as well as pulling back weapons and equipment from friction points in other sectors.

“The involvement of the CSG reflects a synergised approach and response. India is minutely evaluating all aspects of disengagement, which will be a lengthy and laborious process,” said Lieutenant General Vinod Bhatia (retd), a former director general of military operations.

A fifth meeting between delegations led by Lieutenant General Harinder Singh, commander of the Leh-based 14 Corps, and Major General Liu Lin, commander of the South Xinjiang military region could take place soon to discuss different aspects of disengagement, officials said.

Even as disengagement and de-escalation is being discussed and monitored in the highest echelons of the government, defence minister Rajnath Singh will visit Ladakh for a security review on July 17. Singh will also visit forward areas in Jammu and Kashmir on July 18. Army chief General Manoj Mukund Naravane will accompany the minister on the two-day tour.

The military is keeping a strict vigil on the western front to deter Pakistan from fishing in troubled waters and prevent what could turn out to be a two-front conflict, as reported by Hindustan Times on July 2.

The minister will visit Ladakh two weeks after Prime Minister Narendra Modi made an unscheduled visit to the sector on July 3. The PM then declared that the “era of expansionism” is over, sending a strong signal to China about India’s determination to defend its borders.

The July 14 meeting was the fourth round of talks between the corps commander-ranked officers of the two armies who made previous attempts to reduce tensions along the border on June 6, June 22 and June 30.

Negotiations are expected to be far harder this time as the continued presence of the PLA in the Finger Area and the Depsang sector could be the sticking point in the talks.

In Tuesday’s talks, the agenda included the step-wise withdrawal of weapons and equipment to mutually agreed distances from all friction areas along the LAC and thinning the military buildup in the region.

The military dialogue will be followed by another meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on border affairs. The military commanders set the time-frame and method of disengagement while the WMCC monitors the process.

The disengagement effort involves rival troops pulling back a specified distance from face-off sites, with further retreat taking place in phases as the plan progresses on a verifiable basis on the ground every 72 hours by both sides.

The military build-up in Indian and Chinese depth areas hasn’t thinned, with both sides keeping their guard up. The deployment of thousands of soldiers, fighter jets, helicopters, tanks, artillery guns, missile systems and air defence weapons continues in the region.


Supreme Court directs Centre to make new appointments in AFT in one month

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde also said that the court is inclined to extend by 3 months the tenure of officers retiring on July 22 and 23.

“We will extend the tenure. In the meantime, Union can make regular appointments,” CJI Bobde said directing the Central government to make appointments in one month.

We will extend the tenure. In the meantime, Union can make regular appointments,” CJI Bobde said directing the Central government to make appointments in one month.(File photo)

The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up the Central government for not making timely appointments of judicial members in the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) and directed it to do the same within a period of one month.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde also said that the court is inclined to extend by 3 months the tenure of officers retiring on July 22 and 23.

“We will extend the tenure. In the meantime, Union can make regular appointments,” CJI Bobde said directing the Central government to make appointments in one month.

Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Union of India, suggested giving a time of three weeks to consider names for appointments and said that there will be a huge vacuum in the tribunal as officers are retiring on July 22 and 23.

Pulling up the Attorney General, the CJI said, “When we enabled you to make appointments, you haven’t done anything. Why must we give you directions every time?”

Venugopal, responding to the apex court, said that the same could not be done due to certain difficulties. (ANI)