Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Defence Related News

Why big businesses want these farm laws

Agriculture is the only sector that is entirely run by small ‘private entrepreneurs’. After all, that is exactly what farmers are. There is a lot of money to be made here through consolidation. Big businesses can indeed take over the share of income made by intermediaries — traders, transporters, wholesalers and retailers. It is also one sector where demand is permanent, especially if your aim is to sell mostly to the urban middle classes.

Why big businesses want these farm laws

Bitter fact: Farm corporatisation has only created a few agri-giants who make huge profits, while farmers have become poorer and food costlier.

Aunindyo Chakravarty

Senior Economic Analyst

Have you ever wondered why India’s big businesses are suddenly so keen on farming? The answer is very simple. They have already exhausted all other options of making mega profits. After all, we know that farm income in India has not kept pace with inflation for at least the past two decades now. So, in real terms, farmers earn less now than they did in the previous millennium. Yet, big corporates find the agriculture sector attractive enough to have lobbied for these new farm laws.

Darbari economists with their fairytale theories will tell you that corporates entering the farm is a win-win for all. Two banal concepts that they like to use here are ‘economies of scale’ and ‘backward and forward integration’.

The fable of the free market goes something like this: Big companies will bring low-cost finance, they will be able to procure seeds, fertilisers and pesticides at discounted prices because they’ll order it in bulk, they will bring new farming technologies to improve yields, they will reduce wastage at harvest, they will set up cold-chain systems to quickly transport grains, vegetables and fruits and they will even sell the produce at lower prices to the final consumer, in their own retail chains, by removing the villainous middlemen.

Such balderdash is forgivable if spouted by your retired uncle in the family WhatsApp group. When mainstream economists and celebrated commentators regurgitate it, one has to wonder about their real intentions. That’s because it is impossible to believe that they are unaware of the facts of corporatisation of agriculture in other parts of the world. Everywhere, without exception, it has created a few agri-giants who have made massive profits, while farmers have become poorer and food has become more expensive.

The real reason why corporates want to enter the farm sector and why their handmaidens in academia and the media are batting for the new farm laws lies in the recent history of our economy. India has always had monopolies, where a few business houses controlled all organised industries. It even entered the popular lexicon where someone who had the airs of being rich would be ridiculed as one “who thinks they are some Tata-Birla.”

From the late 1960s, this came under restrictions by the state when Indira Gandhi decided that the only way she could take on the ‘syndicate’ of entrenched Congress leaders, was to take a left turn. From the mid-1980s, especially after Rajiv Gandhi became PM, many hurdles placed on big corporate houses were gradually removed. The Rao-Manmohan reforms of the 90s lifted what little remained.

The liberalisation years did give some opportunity for new entrepreneurs to compete with established business houses. This was especially true in export-oriented industries and in the new ‘sunrise’ sectors like IT and telecom. Things looked even better for new businesses in the mid-2000s. Easy finance during UPA-1, new political alignments, policy focus on big-ticket infrastructure projects, and the real estate boom opened the door for the emergence of new companies.

All of these credit-fuelled businesses collapsed when the global financial bubble burst in 2008. Many companies, which had investors chasing them in the mid-2000s, became bankrupt, their market capitalisation dropping to a fraction of what it was in 2007.

Every industry witnessed a process of consolidation, where a few big companies, usually those that were already entrenched, gradually bought over others. Some sectors, such as power, were entirely abandoned, leaving it to the government and public sector banks to deal with the mess created by private capital.

Since the Modi government has come to power, monopolies have become even more entrenched. This was partly a legacy of what UPA-2 had left behind. When a credit bubble bursts, it crushes everyone except businesses that have deep pockets, cash reserves and political heft. The Modi government’s initial attempt to clean up the bad loan mess only made things worse for those with big loans, and ended up strengthening big businesses.

However, the slowdown in the rest of the economy and the government’s terrible performance on jobs has caused the mother of all demand problems. So, corporates are making money by cutting costs, sacking people and reducing investments. They are selling less, but spending even lesser. The result is that big companies are spending their profits on buying back shares and rewarding shareholders with bigger dividends. This is the exact opposite of what growing economies need. It is also a vicious cycle which can only lead to increasing contraction. At some point, there will be no buyers left to sell things to and there will be no profits to be made.

In such a situation, monopoly capital has only one place to turn to. And that is agriculture, which is the only sector that is entirely run by small ‘private entrepreneurs’. After all, that is exactly what farmers are. There is a lot of money to be made here through consolidation. Big businesses can indeed take over the share of income made by intermediaries — traders, transporters, wholesalers and retailers.

There are literally millions of small private entrepreneurs in agriculture who can be pushed aside and replaced by big agricultural monopolies. It is also one sector where demand is permanent, especially if your aim is to sell mostly to the urban middle classes. Urban consumers already pay for margins earned by the entire chain of intermediaries who stand between the farm and their kitchen. It is of no consequence to them whether the profits are being made by a million people or one big company.

For big business, agriculture is the last big sector that offers the opportunity for consolidation. It is also the only space where there is a possibility of growth. That is why they are so keen to see the farm laws stay. And that is what India’s farmers have to fight.


Think tank claims over half of 13L Indian soldiers under severe stress, deletes report later

Representational image of Indian Army | PTI

New Delhi: More than half of the over 13-lakh strong Indian Army personnel “seems to be under severe stress”, according to a study published by the tri-services think tank United Service Institution of India (USI). There have been over 1,100 cases of suicide among varous ranks since 2010.

The study, done by a serving Colonel and published on the USI website last month was, however, removed Friday

“Prolonged exposure of Indian Army personnel to CI (counter- insurgency)/CT (counter-terrorism) environment has been one of the contributory factors for increased stress levels,” Colonel A.K. Mor, senior research fellow at the USI during 2019-20, noted in his study.

The Army, the study further noted, lost more personnel every year due to suicides, fratricides and untoward incidents than in response to enemy or terrorist activities.

While sources in the Army have debunked the study due to its small sample size of just 400 personnel, they did admit that stress was an issue.

On 14 January last year, the USI had also organised a presentation by Colonel Mor on the topic ‘Occupational Stress in Indian Army Due to Prolonged Exposure to Counter Insurgency/ Counter-terrorism Environment’.

Welcome remarks were made by Maj Gen Rajiv Narayanan, head, Research and Centre for Strategic Studies and Simulation (CS3) at USI, followed by its Chairman, Brig Narender Kumar, SM, VSM (Retd) and distinguished fellow.

“The Director, USI suggested the scholar to focus on a selected sample size and diagnose the role and impact of stress on the unit,” the think tank had noted.

The study, which has now been completed, underlined that there has been a significant increase in stress levels among Indian Army personnel in the last two decades due to operational and non-operational stressors.


Also read: Covid dampener for Aero India, several foreign players to give event a miss

 ‘Stress management measures haven’t achieved results’

Talking about the steps taken by the Army and the defence ministry, the study also noted that various stress management measures implemented in the last 15 years “have not been able to achieve the desired results”.

It said that while operational stressors are well understood and accepted by Army personnel, non-operational stress factors are perceived as avoidable and resented against.

Indian Army officers, it added, experience much higher levels of stress as compared to the junior commissioned officers (JCOs) and other ranks (Ors).

Some of the major organisational causes of stress among Army officers have been identified as inadequacies in the quality of leadership, overburdened commitments, inadequate resources, frequent dislocations, lack of fairness and transparency in postings and promotions, insufficient accommodation and non-grant of leaves.

The main organisational stressors, as perceived by JCOs/ORs, were delay and denial of leaves, excessive engagement, humiliation by seniors, lack of dignity, zero error syndrome, unreasonable restrictions on the use of mobile phones, poor quality of ration and cooked food, besides lack of recreational facilities and conflict with seniors as well as subordinates.

However, the study added, “the overall job satisfaction and pride in uniform still remains high amongst JCOs/ORs. However, at the same time, it seems to be a growing matter of concern amongst officers, requiring urgent interventions from the highest levels of government”.

The study called for an institutionalised approach to stress prevention and management which should be treated “as a leadership role at Unit and Formation level.”


Also read: Army plans disciplinary action against soldier at farmers’ protest, troops being sensitised

 


Air Cdre V Rajasekhar appointed 3 BRD chief

Chandigarh, January 8

Air Commodore V Rajasekhar has been appointed the Air Officer Commanding, No. 3 Base Repair Depot, here, the largest establishment of the country for repair and overhaul of Russian-origin helicopters.

Commissioned into the Aeronautical Engineering (Mechanical) Branch of the Indian Air Force in September 1988, he is trained in aircraft maintenance and was involved in the induction and formulation of maintenance philosophy of various new platforms.

For distinguished service of a high order, he was awarded the Vishisht Seva Medal by the President of India in 2013. Meanwhile, Jyothi Rajasekhar took over as the president of the Air Force Wives Welfare Association (Local).


Bathinda farmers oppose land acquisition for project

Bathinda farmers oppose land acquisition for project

Farmers protest outside the DC’s office in Bathinda on Friday.

Bathinda, January 8

Residents of six villages are up in arms against land acquisition for the six-lane Ajmer Green Field expressway passing through Jeeda and other villages in the district.

This project of the union government has triggered unrest among villagers after the survey was conducted by the NHAI.

Punjab farmers have started opposing the land acquisition for the expressway from Amritsar to Jamnagar. The farmers from villages in Bathinda district, where the land is to be acquired, gathered and staged a protest today outside the DC office.

They alleged that they did not need the road, and could not give their land. They claimed that the highway would be taken out from the middle of the fields, due to which, their business would be affected, as they depended primarily on farming for their livelihood.

They alleged that their fields would be divided into two parts and they would not be able to use the road.

Jagjit Singh, head, Zameen Bachao Sangrash Committee, said, “If the government tries to take the land forcibly, we will intensify the struggle.”

This highway is expected to cost Rs 30,000 crore. As much as 75 per cent of the highway would be in Rajasthan, farmers said. — TNS


Tractor March of first Republic Day parade will repeat on 26 Jan 2021

जब देश आजाद हुआ था
तब भी 26 जनवरी पर ट्रैक्टर से परेड निकली थी
और हजारों लोग जमा हुए थे परेड देखने के लिए।
इतिहास दोबारा दोहराया जाएगा

tractor march


Half of Army under stress, says military think-tank More dying due to suicides, fratricides and other factors

Half of Army under stress, says military think-tank

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 7

Every year, the Army loses its personnel to suicides, fratricides and untoward incidents. In the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in their stress levels.

Major causes

  • Reports blame “prolonged exposure” to counter-terrorist environment as one of the contributory factors for increased stress levels.
  • Non-combat related reasons add to the operational stress and have adverse effects on health of soldiers.
  • Major causes include inadequacies in the quality of leadership, overburdened commitments, inadequate resources and frequent dislocations.

“At present, more than half of the Army seems to be under severe stress…. this is due to operational and non-operational reasons,” say the findings of the country’s leading think tank, United Services Institution (USI), which is compiling a book from the outcome of a seminar “Prevailing Stress Levels in Indian Army due to Prolonged

Exposure to Counter Insurgency/Counter Terrorism Environment”, which it had organised in October 2020.

Excerpts of the same have been put up on the USI website under ‘strategic perspectives’ for the period October-December 2020. Among the JCOs and jawans, the study identifies reasons, including delay and denial of leave, excessive engagements, domestic problems, humiliation by seniors, lack of dignity, unreasonable restrictions on the use of mobiles, lack of recreational facilities, conflict with seniors as well as subordinates, health problems, inadequacy of train reservation, inefficient administrative support, financial problems, lack of transparency in promotions, delay in crediting of financial claims and poor quality of rations. “There is a need to remove all shortcomings at the earliest.” says the study.


ARMERS’ AGITATION Centre-farmers talks remain inconclusive; govt says it cannot and will not repeal farm laws

http://

Vibha Sharma
Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 8

The eighth round of talks between protesting farmers and the Centre ended inconclusively yet again with Agriculture Minister Narendra Singh Tomar making it clear that the government will not repeal the Acts and ‘jathebandis’ stating that they are willing to settle for nothing less.

The next round has been proposed on January 15 with the government hoping for some resolution at the January 11 Supreme Court hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the three agricultural laws.

This also means the farmers will be celebrating the festival of Lohri at borders of Delhi.

Hardening their stance, unions have also made it clear that “whatever the courts might order they are not going to budge until they secure repeal of the laws and discussion on MSP moves further”.

http://

They have already given a deadline of January 26, the day when they “march into Delhi”. “It is best to leave this to the Supreme Court to decide,” Kavitha Kuruganti of the Mahila Kisan Adikar Manch said quoting Tomar at the meeting, terming today’s proceedings as a “complete breakdown of talks”.

“It is a very sad day for Indian democracy that in middle of talks an elected government, which has constantly been cheating the farmers, now says let us get this resolved through the Supreme Court. The court has already looked at the eviction-related issue and said that it is the democratic right of farmers to protest and passed orders on that,” she said.

Leaders said only “one point was taken up” at the meeting today. While Tomar kept saying they should discuss the three Acts, unions kept insisting the Bills be taken back.

http://

There was no discussion on MSP as leaders made their intentions clear with slogans like ‘ya jitenge ya marenga’ (either we will die or win) and ‘Bill wapsi ghar wapsi’.

They also slammed Punjab BJP leaders for giving ‘gaalis’ (abusing) to farmers and maligning the agitation. “We are not a political party. Only if you return the Bills will we go back,” they said.

Union Ministers and farmers during the eighth round of talks with the Union Government at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi on Friday. Courtesy: Government sources

After Tomar insisted that several unions were agreeable to the laws, BKU leader Balbir Singh Rajewal told him “agriculture was a state subject, still the Centre made laws on it”.

“It is an established fact that you cannot interfere on the subject of agriculture. But you get your secretary and your joint secretary to work on it, and they keep coming up with excuses (to interfere). I have a list of cases in which the Supreme Court’s full Bench has ruled that the Central government cannot interfere on the subject,” Rajewal said.

Union Ministers and farmers during the eighth round of talks with the Union Government at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi on Friday. Courtesy: Government sources

Also read: Ahead of talks, govt says hopeful of resolving farmers’ issues

Farmers leaders arrive to attend the eighth round of talks with the Union Government at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune Photo: Mukesh Aggarwal

Apart from Tomar, Union ministers Piyush Goyal and Som Parkash, who is from Punjab, were also present at the talks with the unions.

Meanwhile, Tomar played down his meeting with religious leader Baba Lakha Singh, a head of the Nanaksar Sikh sect, saying that the government did not approach him for mediation with farmers.

Also read: Will not withdraw from fight against farm laws, Priyanka Vadra tells Punjab Congress MPs

BKU national spokesperson Rakesh Tikait, along with farmers, arrive to attend the eighth round of talks with the Centre at Vigyan Bhawan on Friday. Tribune Photo: Mukesh Aggarwal

 “We have not approached anyone for mediation. There are those who oppose the laws and those who support them, the government gives time to everyone to hear their views.

“Being a religious leader and someone with farmers’ best interests in his heart and pained at their plight in this cold, Baba Lakha Singh wanted to discuss the issue. He spoke of farmers’ perspective while I told him about the government’s point of view. I hope he talked to unions about our discussion. We did not approach him for mediation,” Tomar said.

BKU national spokesperson Rakesh Tikait, along with farmers, at Ghazipur border during the ongoing protest against new farm laws, in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan

Ahead of the eighth round of talks with the Union Ministers, BKU leader Rakesh Tikait has already said the government can try as much as it wants, farmers will not go back home till the three Acts were repealed.

“The government still has time till tomorrow. It can make a law on MSP and take back the three laws and fulfil demands of the agitation. The tractor march was a trailer. The full movie will be shown on January 26 (Republic Day when farmers have planned a tractor parade)” he said.

BKU national spokesperson Rakesh Tikait, along with farmers, at Ghazipur border during the ongoing protest against new farm laws, in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan
Farmers at Ghazipur border during their ongoing protest against new farm laws, in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan
Farmers at Ghazipur border during their ongoing protest against new farm laws, in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan
Farmers at Ghazipur border during their ongoing protest against new farm laws, in New Delhi on Friday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan

No kids under 15, no standing spectators, shorter parade — Covid forces a ‘different’ R-Day

Representational image of R-Day parade | Praveen Jain | ThePrint

Representational image of R-Day parade | Praveen Jain | ThePrint

New Delhi: No children aged below 15 years, less than one-fourth the usual number of participants, and no standing spectators — these are some of the changes the Covid-19 pandemic has brought to the Republic Day parade.

The 2021 Republic Day parade on 26 January will come just days before India completes a year of its battle against Covid-19 — the first coronavirus case in the country was reported last January, and the first fatality recorded in March.

While India is set to roll out vaccines for the disease, Covid-19 continues to infect thousands of people every day. As a result, several restrictions will be in place as India marks its 72nd Republic Day with the annual parade, which is a showcase of the country’s cultural heritage and military might.

Speaking to ThePrint, senior government officials said the 2021 Republic Day parade will be a low-key affair with 25,000 spectators, as compared to 1.15 lakh last year.

The conduct of the parade, the sources added, will be similar to last year, but “social distancing has been factored into all activities”. However, the distance the parade covers will be shorter. While the parade usually goes from Vijay Chowk to the Red Fort, it will end at National Stadium this time, a difference of approximately 5 km.


Also Read: India ‘unlikely’ to have Republic Day chief guest after UK PM drops out — a first in 55 yrs


Covid protocols in place

According to senior government officials, only children aged above 15 years will be allowed at the parade, and there will be no standing spectators.

The usual tiered stands — used for seating the audience during the Republic Day parade and the Beating the Retreat ceremony (29 January) — will be missing as well. Instead, the officials said, chairs will be placed on wooden elevated platforms of three different heights — 3 inches, 5 inches and 10 inches. A suitable number of rows will be arranged height-wise at the venue to ensure physically-distanced seating, the officials added.

Other steps being taken in view of the pandemic include thermal screening at all entry points, and a thorough sanitisation of the premises. The dais, officials said, will be sprayed with anti-viral/bacterial coating.

Masks, gloves and hand sanitisers will be available at the gates.

 Eight isolation/resting booths will be set up at the venue in case anyone is detected with symptoms of Covid-19 during entry. A doctor and a paramedic will be stationed at each of these booths.

26 tableaux this year

There will be 26 tableaux at the parade this year, including from nine central ministries and departments, and 17 states and Union Territories (UTs). Last year’s parade had 22 tableaux.

There will be two special tableaux this year — one from the Ministry of Culture, heralding “75 years of Independence” celebrations (India completes 75 years of Independence in 2022), and another on “New India” (a catchphrase of the Modi government) by the Union Information & Broadcasting Ministry, the sources said.

An expert committee under the defence ministry selects the tableaux from several applications.

A team from the Bangladesh armed forces will also participate in the parade to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.

As many as 23 bands — 18 from the Army, one from the Navy and the IAF each, and three from the Central Armed Police Forces — are scheduled to play 24 music tunes.

Another possible difference this year is the absence of a foreign dignitary as chief guest. India had invited UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson for the parade but he dropped out Tuesday, at the last moment, citing the Covid situation. If this happens, it will be a first since 1966.


lso Read: Should Delhi’s Republic Day parade be held in a state capital every year?