Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

LIVES ON THE LINE, BY DAY & BY NIGHT

Soldiers along the Line of control are in the thick of a nerve­wracking battle after the surgical strikes in september altered the rules of the game. Hindustan Times spent time with army troops on the border to understand the challenges the men are up aga

THE SOLDIER WILL HAVE TO STAND AT HIS POST AS THE SNOWS PILE UP TO 20 AND 30 FEET AND TEMPERATURES FALL TO MINUS 20. EACH POST IS CUT OFF FROM THE OTHER FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY…

Imagine standing at attention for a full 120 minutes. Imagine scanning the ridges and valleys, looking for trees that may have been cut overnight. Imagine straining your ears each time the leaves rustle. Imagine being glued to an automatic weapon, finger constantly on the trigger. Imagine an icy wind sweeping your face and the snow collecting at your feet. Imagine a life constantly on the edge.

Soldiers along the 740-km Line of Control (LoC), that demarcates India and Pakistan, are in the thick of a nerve-wracking battle. The surgical strikes following the suicide attack on an army camp in Uri on September 18 that killed 20 soldiers have drastically altered the rules of the game. The ceasefire agreement of 2003 is in tatters and the daily dose of mortar and artillery fire, have the jawans on their toes.

Lives are now on the line, by day and by night. The LoC is not an easy place to get to but HT got permission to go to the forward posts. The first briefing by Colonel MB Singh, commanding officer, 20 Rashtriya Rifles, left little room for doubt. “The place where you’re standing is within enemy range and can be pounded. In case that happens, you need to take shelter,’’ he said, pointing to his right, where sandbags cover an underground bunker. His men know the drill. Bunkers have come up next to every post and that’s the only safe place, provided you have the time to respond and run. Six to eight soldiers can crouch for safety in freshly-made bunkers that have been constructed after the surgical strikes on September 29.

Safety, however, is one thing that is not guaranteed. The soldiers, who are on full alert for 120 minutes, after which they rest their taut nerves for the next two hours, are now not just looking for infiltrating terrorists. They are also guarding against sniper attacks from Pakistani rangers and the battle action teams (BATs) comprising jihadis from the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammad. In the unequal proxy war that has become sharp and intense, leaves have been curtailed and commanding officers are up all night and in constant touch with their company commanders. Leading from the front in the time of escadetect, lation and ‘near-war’ – as one officer put it – is of utmost importance.

A NEW NORMAL

India cannot afford a breach along the LoC or along the 221-km stretch of the international border between Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan. The bloody attack in Uri in September and the audacious three-day stand-off at the air force base in Pathankot in January are painful reminders of what a breach can result in. “We now constantly practise anti-fidayeen and counter BAT drills,’’ says Bhaskar Kataria, commanding officer, 19 Maratha. His unit is responsible for roughly 38 km of the LoC but even though his posts are ‘’dominating Pakistan’’ because they are at a higher height, that’s not solace enough. His troops get a daily reminder of what DIE stands for: identify, eliminate. The identification is of utmost importance. In the dead of night – when the troops have to be on maximum alert – the danger of shooting one of your own has to be factored in and the orders are strict: do not fire till you have established the identity of a militant with a weapon.

In the precipitous heights that range from 9,000 to 14,000 feet, danger is manifold. Up until the attack in Uri, the army could monitor infiltration routes selectively and focus on areas identified through surveillance radars and intelligence inputs but the surgical strikes on ‘launch pads’ (areas where the Pakistani army keeps trained terrorists just before they’re pushed across the LoC into India) have also changed the vocabulary of the officers tasked with guarding the line once referred to as ‘the most dangerous place on earth’ by former US President Bill Clinton.

“We are dealing with a ‘new normal’,’’ one officer tells us. What’s the ‘new normal?’ we ask. The answer is as simple as it is stark. It is visible on a daily basis: killing of civilians (eight in a single day on November 1), heavy mortar shells whistling through the treacherous mountains, scaring civilians into migrating, artillery pounding of each other’s positions, stealth attacks that leave soldiers’ bodies mutilated.

After the ceasefire in 2003, the Indian army was able to fence large parts of the Line of Control. Attempts at putting up the anti-infiltration obstacle system (AIOS) were made earlier too but were met with constant firing from Pakistan. The rolls of concertina wire that make up this fence had helped bring infiltration levels down but the figures are spiking once again. Determined and highly-motivated terrorists are attempting to cross the line again and 2016 has already seen 70 attempts (up to September) as compared to 30 in 2015. “The fence is constantly under the gaze. It cannot be protected at every step but the troops return to the same spot, under their guard, every 30 minutes, to see if anyone has attempted to cut it,” an officer explains.

But scores of Indian posts lie ahead of the fence and these are extremely vulnerable. Sepoy Mandeep Singh, the young 28-year-old jawan whose body was mutilated, was at one such location when he came under attack from the battle action teams on October 28. Officials privy to the attack say – but only off the record – that he was beheaded just like Hemraj was three years ago, in the Poonch sector. The BATs retreated as quickly and stealthily as they had entered, secure that their masters in the Pakistani army would help them by providing cover fire. In a similar action, five days earlier, Surat Singh, from 22 Grenadiers, was amongst those who noticed some movement in the bushes. Was it a Pakistani infiltrator or a panther? That’s a question they have to contend with often. Soon, Singh saw infiltrators coming towards them with grenade launchers. He was hit by shrapnel and fell to the ground.

The border is at its most volatile. India has shrugged off its self-imposed restriction of opening up its artillery weapons and the verbal messaging from the political masters is unambiguous: fire ten mortars in return for one; don’t ask for flag meetings to lower tensions.

MULTIPLE ENEMIES

The surgical strikes, owned politically by the Narendra Modi government, have buoyed the troops on the ground but unlike the past, the officers know that this winter is going to be a turbulent one. Heavy snowfall makes for a formidable trek across the LoC but admits Lt Gen Satish Dua, Corps Commander, 15 Corps, “We expect a more difficult winter because of the heightened state of alert after the surgical strikes and are prepared for any misadventure from Pakistan.”

A heightened state of alert through the winter is a mind-boggling exercise, unimaginable till you visit the forward posts. The ridges were covered with snow in the last week of October and the temperatures had dipped to minus six degrees Celsius. And that’s just the beginning. The soldier will have to stand at his post as the snows slowly pile up to 20 and 30 feet and temperatures fall to minus 20. Each post is cut off from the other from October to February and each has to be stocked with enough ration and fuel so that the jawans can sustain themselves. For those who need to move, ropes are tied to winter route markers to help them slither to and fro. “We are fighting more than one enemy,’’ says Kataria. Twenty RR’s Singh adds, “Each soldier needs 2.3 kg of ration and while earlier we could stock by day, this time we are doing it after light fades so we are not visible to the enemy.’’

Soon, the platoon hawaldar will also be checking the feet of each solider to ensure he’s not showing early signs of chilblains. But as the days shrink, the nights become longer and the infiltrators prepare to infiltrate in snow suits, the most challenging of all is casualty evacuation. It is difficult for helicopters to land in thick fog and snow blizzards but the injured must be rushed. Surat Singh, injured by splinters, was carried on the shoulders of his colleagues because the ‘hepter’ couldn’t make it despite the pilot’s best attempts.

Lives are on the line and there is little room for leisure. Brigadier Zubin A Minwalla in Kupwara’s Pharkian Gali area had organised a cake-cutting for one of his officers, Vaibhav Fauzdar’s wedding anniversary. Before they could gather at 5pm, came news of Surat’s injury and the news that the infiltrators had managed to flee.

On the Line of Control, birthdays and anniversaries can provide a few minutes of relief and motivation, if at all. Too much is at stake. The beauty of the white mountains is treacherous. The snowcapped heights belie the daily battle of life and death


2 IAF units to receive President’s Standard on Nov 10

Ambala, November 4

The 501 Signal Unit and 30 Squadron will receive the President’s Standard from President Pranab Mukherjee for their exceptional and dedicated services at the Air Force Station here on November 10.Western Air Command AOC-in-C Air Marshal SB Deo informed this at the Air Forces Station here today.The 30 Squadron, based in Pune, was raised on November 1, 1969, while 501 Signal Unit, based in Barnala, was raised in 1964. The Air Marshal expressed pride over the selection of the units and said: “The President’s Standards are given to units of the armed forces which render exceptional and dedicated service over a period of time. The President himself selects the unit after a lot of deliberation and it is the most valuable achievement for a unit.” —TNS


MPs may soon get 100% salary hike

MPs may soon get 100% salary hike
The PMO is believed to have agreed to revise not only parliamentarians’ salary but also their allowances. File photo

New Delhi, November 2The central government has decided to give a 100 percent raise to members of parliament from their current Rs 50,000 a month.The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is learnt to have agreed to consider a proposal by the Joint Committee on Salaries and Allowances of Members of Parliament, which is headed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Yogi Adityanath.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

The PMO is believed to have agreed to revise not only parliamentarians’ salary but also their allowances.The government is also considering an increase in President’s salary from current Rs. 1.5 lakh a month to Rs. 5 lakh and the governor’s salary from current Rs. 1.10 lakh to Rs. 2.5 lakh. — ANI


Kasauli Literary Festival & Visit to Jammu on Infantry day

I attended the Kasauli Literary Festival on 15-16 Oct and was involved in two great sessions. The first with Lt Gen Mohinder Puri, former GOC 8 Mtn Div during Kargil operations in 1999. We reviewed the operations keeping his great book Kargil : Turning the Tide, recently published by Lancer. Along with us was Lt Gen KJ Singh, former GOC in C Western Command.

A day earlier I appeared on a panel on Nationalism, with Kanhaiya Kumar, Madhu Kishwar and  Gul Panag to discuss Nationalism. It proved to be the high point of the Fest leading one of the high profile journalists Achana Masih  from Rediff, who was there too, to write this piece for rediff.

I dressed very casually for the fest keeping in mind the prevailing environment of informality.

Incidentally I was trolled all over social media with advice that I should not share the panel with Kanhaiya. I made sure I did.
The second piece below is a commentary on my visit to Jammu on 27 Oct  , the 69th anniversary of the arrival of the Indian troops in Srinagar (1 SIKH, to be precise). I attended a seinar organized by the Jammu Citizen’s Forum and spoke extensively there on some ideas on breaking the impasse over Kashmir. The suggestions, as yet not concrete were made to test the waters and seems they went down well. They now need to be executed and we are working on that.

Yeh Hai Indian Army!’

‘Those who say the Indian Army is persecuting Kashmiris… I will tell them the reality is that the Kashmiri loves the fauj and what all the Indian Army has done.’

India

IMAGE: A soldier marches past the national flag in New Delhi. Photograph: Adnan Abidi/Reuters

“Jai Hind! Let’s start with a good Jai Hind!” Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (retd) says energetically as he takes the lectern on a pleasant afternoon in Kasauli.

With him on stage is former JNU students union president Kanhaiya Kumar, actress-activist Gul Panag (her father Lieutenant General H S Panag is in the audience) and academic-activist Madhu Kishwar.

As expected, it turns out to be a crackling debate on nationalism conducted mostly in Hindi, a nice departure from English language dominated lit fests.

Kanhaiya Kumar, the first speaker, stresses that India’s nationalism must be based on multiculturalism and ultra nationalism should be confronted and defeated.

“We should be careful about a particular kind of nationalism,” he says, “being generated based on hatred towards a particular community — being manifested in the form of cricket nationalism, cinema nationalism and army nationalism.”

“You can say that you will not allow Fawad Khan to work in India, but when you don’t allow Nawazuddin Siddiqui to act in a Ramleela that means your nationalism is not based on the identity of this country, but hatred towards a community,” Kanhaiya Kumar says to a round of applause.

“There is another nationalism — army nationalism. 16 men from my family are in the paramilitary. A debate is being portrayed that you cannot say anything against the army,” he adds. “We are not against the army, but against the misuse of the army for political goals.”

Lt Gen Hasnain, Actress Gul Panag, Academic Madhu Kishwar and Kanhaiya Kumar

IMAGE: General Hasnain, Gul Panag, Madhu Kishwar and Kanhaiya Kumar.

Sitting beside him is a general and a general’s daughter, a testament to the free flow of thoughts unfolding on stage on day two of the Khushwant Singh Literary Festival.

Doffing a hat to the army man sitting beside her, Gul warmly acknowledges her father, the former Army commander in charge of Jammu and Kashmir and the entire Line of Control, in the audience when it is her time to speak.

She says she had wanted to join the infantry, but the Indian Army had not started recruiting women at that time.

“I am a nationalist, but that doesn’t mean I am blind to India’s faults. There is a tendency to narrow the definition of nationalism to almost mean pro-government. Being anti-government does not mean anti-national,” she says to a round of applause.

“All of us have the right to speak for what we think will make a better India and not be cowed down because we believe our opinion will be the only one.”

General Hasnain comes to the podium with the robust Jai Hind! and picks up with a point that Kanhaiya Kumar has made to begin his spirited talk on nationalism, most debated in India these days.

The general takes on Kanhaiya Kumar’s critique of the army and gives us an assessments of the Indian Army based on his experiences. One that is best understood in his own words. Rediff.com‘s Archana Masih reports:

Lt Gen Hasanain

IMAGE: General Hasnain signs an autograph for a school boy at the Kasauli Lit Fest.

“I reacted to what happened to Nawazuddin Siddiqui in a Times of India middle.

In the army, in my unit mandir, the prayer was led by my wife and me and as you know I am a Muslim (Applause).

That is what motivated me to write that article (on Nawazuddin).

Anywhere you go to in the Indian Army you will find a sarv dharm sthal.

If your idea of nationalism is multiculturalism, then you just have to go to the Indian Army.

In the J&K Light Infantry, the MMG gun has been transformed to ‘Mandir, Masjid, Gurdwara’ (Applause).

On the day of Eid, if the maulvi is not there, the granthi can lead the namaaz.

Yeh Hai Indian Army!

Kanhaiyaji, on the misuse of the Indian Army for ultra nationalism — I want to say stop defining nationalism and patriotism because a lot of time will pass and you won’t find that definition.

It is better to come to demonstrative nationalism.

I am a second generation officer. In 1947 when Partition happened, my father was with his unit in Peshawar. He was the only Muslim in an all Hindu unit. We are both from the Garhwal Rifles which is a purely Hindu regiment.

My father’s commanding officer asked him that Partition has happened and as the only Muslim officer what had he decided.

My father said: ‘Jo mulk mazhab ke naam pe banega who shuru mein celebrate karega par zyada din nahi chalega.’

Par woh mulk jo har mazhab ke saath banega, shuruat mein mushkiliat aayengi, par woh mulk har samay ke liye celebrate karega.’ (Applause).

(A nation which is constructed on the basis of religion will celebrate, but will not exist for a long time.)

(But a nation that takes all religions along will experience difficulties no doubt, but will celebrate for all times to come.)

I too joined that regiment and we both became general officer commanding of the Indian Army. That is demonstrative nationalism.

On social media when I said I will be with Kanhaiya Kumar on a panel, people started asking me, ‘Why?’ ‘You are nationalist,’ they said.

I said Kanhiaya is also a nationalist, but I want to say some things to you (the general says, looking at Kanhaiya)

I invite you to come with for seven days with the Indian Army to the Kashmir valley. I’ll take you to some areas in the valley that will change your mind.

I will take all 16 members of your family that serve in the military because they have not been made to understand what patriotism and nationalism is (Applause).

Those who say the Indian Army is persecuting Kashmiris… I was called the People’s General. I will tell them that the reality is that the Kashmiri loves the fauj and what all the Indian Army has done, but if you listen to propaganda by Pakistan and other extranational forces, then you will speak with such thoughts.

India is only 70 years old — for the next 170 years these issues will continue because this country is evolving.

Attempts will be made to take this nation off its track, but this nation will always remain on the correct track.

It will be what its destiny is meant to be — it will be a great nation. Jai Hind!

Archana Masih / Rediff.com in Kasauli

Lt Gen Ata Hasnain lends credence to Jammu’s vital role
Jammu has strength, power to mould dimensions of K issue
10/27/2016 10:31:01 PM
Early Times Report

Jammu, Oct 27: In what has lent credence to the fact that Jammu has vital place and role while addressing the complex Kashmir issue, Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain today minced no words in saying that it is only Jammu which has the power and strength to mould the dimensions of the problem as it is only people of this place who comprehend it well besides understanding the psychology of Kashmiris in essence.
It was neither a TV debate or discussion on Kashmir issue over which it has become a fad for everyone to speak and opine. Lt-Gen Hasnain, who has , commanded an Army Corps in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir and spent quite a reasonable time on this assignment in Kashmir said this while participating in a seminar in Jammu today. Having understood the nerve of the various dimensions of Kashmir issue closely, Lt Gen Hasnain said it expressly to drive home the point that notwithstanding a plethora of so called Kashmir experts having emerged lately, the real people and place which understand the nuances of the issue completely is Jammu, this region having watched and felt the developments very closely than any other place.
While this is being seen as a new thought and dimension to the issue in terms of dealing or handling with the complex K issue, Lt Gen Hasnain’s assertion on it has given further credibility to the fact that Jammu is the key player for many vital aspects for Kashmir, the opinion from an Army officer carries weight as his comprehension of each and every development that takes place in Kashmir is considered to be well meaning, realistic and reliable.
The senior Army officer was even unhesitant in saying no one outside Lakhanpur actually knows what the Kashmir problem is all about nor could there be anyone other than people of Jammu who can suggest ways and means to bring people of Kashmir out of morass. While the successive governments have failed to comprehend it properly, there could be no military solution either to the vexed issue.
Lt Gen Ata Hasnain’s assertion was the whole issue needed to be seen and understood not merely involving Kashmir instead as one that of entire J&K. His thrust was also suggestive that solution to the issue will ultimately emerge from Jammu which has the power and capacity to change the dimension, be at the level of leadership, businessmen or even at the level of common people.
“I will continue to emphasise on this issue that it is every institution of Jammu and it is every citizen of Jammu who must realize that he is the most important citizen in this county today because he understand this problem. He is the stakeholder in this entire issue”, Lt Gen Hasnain said while stating this with conviction that Jammu and its people were important over and above any other stakeholder.

 

 


Outrage over mutilation, gloom in Haryana village

Kurukshetra/Jammu, Oct 29

It was his (Mandeep’s) duty, he has done it. He sacrificed his life. We should give a befitting reply to Pakistan. — Mandeep’s father

The barbaric incident at the Line of Control in Kashmir in which the body of an Army jawan was mutilated after being killed by terrorists, aided by the cover fire by Pakistan army, sparked an outrage today even as a pall of gloom descended on his native village in Haryana.Union Minister Jitendra Singh condemned the mutilation of the soldier’s body as “atrocious”, while senior Congress leader Manish Tewari called it “depraved behaviour”.At Sepoy Mandeep Singh’s Antehri village in Kurukshetra, his family demanded that Pakistan be taught a lesson for harbouring terrorists while former Army officers expressed their sadness. His brother Sandeep Singh demanded  10 Pakistani heads for the price of one.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)“These are acts of cowardice and are happening at a time of desperation on the part of the Pakistan army as well as Islamabad,” minister Jitendra Singh said.“I am very sad being a soldier. It is a very sad mentality to take your anger on an injured or dead person,” said Maj Gen BC Khanduri (retd).Former Army Chief General JJ Singh (retd) said it reflected the “barbarism” of the Pakistan army. “India should tell the whole world what Pakistan is doing. Particularly with India, we honoured their fallen soldiers who they had abandoned. They should be grateful to us forever. How uncivilised they are…” he said. — Agencies

Army says 4 Pak posts destroyed in massive assault

SRINAGAR/NEW DELHI: The Army said on Saturday it destroyed four Pakistani posts in a “massive” assault across the Line of Control in north Kashmir’s Kupwara district amid mounting tension over the mutilation of an Indian soldier’s body by militants.

“Four Pakistani posts were destroyed in a massive fire assault in Keran sector,” an army official said. Heavy casualties have been inflicted on the Pakistani side, he said, without elaborating. The Indian strike is seen as a retaliation to ceasefire violations by Pakistani troops in the Keran sector earlier in the day.

The de-facto border with Pakistan has remained tense since a militant attack on an army camp at Uri in Jammu and Kashmir in September left 19 soldiers dead. India retaliated by carrying out “surgical strikes” across the LoC to destroy several militant launch pads in Pakistanoccupied Kashmir. NEW DELHI: Amid continuing ceasefire violations by Pakistani troops along the LoC, home minister Rajnath Singh on Saturday assured the nation that security forces were giving “befitting reply” to firing from across the border and that the country will not bow down before anyone. “I want to assure the nation that the security forces are giving befitting reply to the firing from Pakistan. We will not bow down before anyone,” he told reporters here.

JeM backed by Pak army may be behind jawan’s mutilation

NEW DELHI: Intelligence agencies suspect Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) militants, backed by Pakistani Army, to be behind the killing and mutilation of 17 Sikh battalion sepoy Mandeep Singh at Machhil sector on Friday evening, even as high alert has been sounded along the Line of Control (LoC) for more BAT action by terrorists for the remaining of 2016.

Sepoy Singh of 53 Independent Brigade was part of a patrol that left its base in Machhil sector at 4pm on Friday and was ambushed around 7.45pm by the JeM terrorists with Pakistani army providing fire cover for nearly four hours, sources said.

The Pakistani army pounded Indian positions from 4pm and continued till 8pm to facilitate BAT action by JeM terrorists. A Pakistani terrorist was gunned down by the Indian forces in retaliation but his body has not been recovered.

Top government sources said some 250-300 terrorists of both JeM and largely Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) are waiting deep beyond the launching pads to infiltrate across the LoC.

Indian security establishment has discussed the possibility of a BAT action by Pakistani terrorists along the LoC after September 28-29 surgical strikes by Indian special forces in PakistanOccupied Kashmir (PoK).

Indian army chief Gen Dalbir Singh had alerted the Northern Command on the possibility of such action.

Post the surgical strikes, one army trooper, three BSF soldiers and three civilians have been killed in cross border and LoC firing and mortar shelling by Pakistani Army.

Nineteen personnel of the security forces and 41 civilians have been injured in the unprovoked firing and shelling that has affected more than 150 villages along the international border in Jammu.

The Pakistani focus on 125 Hindu-dominated villages in Jammu has killed one person and injured another nine from the minority community.

Home ministry reports indicate all the 101 BSF/army posts have been targeted by Pakistani army since September 28-29 with Uri and Machhil sector being pounded by enemy mortars since the surgical strikes. The Pakistani army is firing across the IB and LoC with heavy machine guns and 82-inch mortars to facilitate infiltration by pinning down Indian security forces.


Do You Know Your Defense Forces? FAQs: On the Constitutional Status of Defense Forces?

Do You Know Your Defense Forces? FAQs: On the Constitutional Status of Defense Forces?

 Question No 1. Military veterans seems to be always agitated on issues like pay, pension and allowances. Why is it? Are they depressed or greedy? 
Answer.
Military veterans vocal on electronic, print and social media or agitating on Jantar Mantar airing their concerns on many issues concerning military, are neither depressed nor greedy. Soldiers of Indian army give more preference to service to nation and democracy than money. There are certain pressure points which govts after govts have not only ignored since 1973, but are creating more reasons for agitations.
As for as public is concerned, in independent India it is happening for the first time, that in last 5-6 years military veterans have taken the course of agitation on key issues in public domain creating ripples in minds of common man creating such false impressions. The issues are pending with govt since 1973 and now the patience of soldiers is at breaking point.
Question No 2. But why shall Govt show such apathetic attitude towards soldiers? Soldiers defend nation and render great service and politicians, babus and govt are surely aware of it? 
Answer
It puzzles solders too. Why such apathetic attitude towards soldiers? Serving soldiers do not have unions or lobbies like civilians. They always had blind trust in govt but in 1973 they were delivered a serious blow when their status, pay, pensions and allowances were reduced drastically by 3rd pay commission and that of civilians raised.  It created serious imbalance and that too once soldiers had delivered an unprecedented and historic military victory in 1971 war.  Instead of award, soldiers were punished. It never happens like that. It is a sure way of killing the high moral of a victorious army setting a wrong precedence.
Soldiers have a system of reporting their problems to their commanding officers, who then report the matter to services HQ at Delhi. Military Chiefs then take up matter with the govt. Soldiers followed the same system and had trust in the ability of their chiefs and Govt. Naturally such serious imbalance created by 3rd pay commission were reported to Govt through proper channels. Then PM Indra Gandhi assured Military Chiefs of resolution of their problems but it never happened.
Since 1973. chiefs after chiefs have kept reporting the matter to Govt. Govts after Govts have kept assuring soldiers about resolution of their problems but without any solution in sight. Rather various political parties have used frustration of soldiers for petty vote bank politics. It has now created a situation wherein soldiers have lost trust in ability of military chiefs to get solution and started doubting the intentions and seriousness of Govts to deliver justice forcing them to came on street and social media bringing matters into the notice of public. After in all in democracy people are supreme. It is surely not a healthy sign for the democracy. It has also created problem within military where abilities of top leaderships to effectively communicate with govt are now being questioned?
Question 3. Still why is Govt not serious? Soldiers on street in democracy is a frightening scene? 
 
Answer. 
It is surprising for soldiers too. Why is govt not serious? Why are political parties only interested in using frustration of soldiers for votes? Ignoring the problem without giving any justification is like adding the fuel to fire. Unfortunately, such apathy is creating impressions that corrupt politician- babu nexus has no time for serious issues of the nation and soldiers demand for justice is no exception. Look around, justice system has collapsed, govt administration is totally rusted, corruption rules everywhere, parliament has become defunct, proxy govts rule, no political party has internal democracy, funding channels are kept secret, banking is overburdened with NPAs, gap between poor and rich are widening, farmers are committing suicide. A situation of hopelessness exists. It looks politics has become a profession of employment for failed people who are only interested in loot and plunder. Babus, banks, judiciary, some crony businessmen and temple priests, have joined hands with corrupt politicians to create a mafia. Naturally such mafia has no time and sensitivity for soldiers and justice or what else could be the reason?
Indian soldiers are sensitive, committed to constitution and responsible people. Soldiers know that in the given situation of hopelessness, if they also come on street, as it happens in other countries, it will deliver a death blow to the nation. Naturally so, military veterans have taken the responsibility to communicate with “we the people” who are supreme in democracy, keeping the threshold of agitation well below acceptable limits so that the situation doesn’t explode.
Questions 4. What are the major demands of soldiers? 
 
Answer 
 
The major demands of soldiers are:
1. Status of soldiers as given in the constitution be respected.

2. Accordingly, serious imbalances and disparities between compensation model of soldiers and other govt civil employees be removed based on best HR practices taking into account the average career earnings including pension  benefits.

Question 5.  What are the constitutional provisions for the executive authority of the military? 
Answer
Constitutional military executive authority of the soldiers comes out of the following articles:
1. Article 18;- respects the “Title of Ranks” of Soldiers even after his death. Soldiers never retire. Title of Ranks never die.
2. Article 34:- Gives military a political executive authority to intervene by declaring martial law only to restore democracy.  In India parliamentary democracy is supreme. This article makes Indian military as soldiers totally committed to democracy and “we the people”. There may be situation where state fails to govern as per constitution or parliament is unable to function due to any reasons or rise of a civilian dictator endangers democracy or external/ internal aggression endangers it . In such situations constitution makes obligatory on military authorities to intervene to protect and restore democracy. Baba Saheb Ambedkar was a very wise man. He could sense that in independent India, probability of rise of civilian dictators are more than rise of a military dictator. He therefore under this article, entrusted military a role of silent and invisible custodian of Indian democracy.  History of independent India is testimony to the fact that Baba Saheb was right. Military has been loyal to constitution and we the people whereas Indra tried to become dictator declaring unconstitutional emergency. Military did play its role to protect democracy, when then Army Chief cautioned Indra to remain within limits of constitution. In fact emergency was lifted as all three chiefs wrote a top secret letter to Indra Gandhi advising her to lift emergency and call for elections. Probably this is right time the content of this letter shall be disclosed to public.
3. Article 52 read clubbed with Article 74:- The sovereign authority of govt is vested in the President who wears two distinct hats. One of being head of civil political govt and other of supreme commander of defense forces. These two roles of the president are independent. Under this article the hard and soft national powers are identified and constitutionally divided. While the democracy under the pre-dominance of soft power functions under the leadership of Prime Minister and his cabinet, the total command authority over the hard power of military is denied to him/her. Baba Saheb was a visionary and had deep knowledge of Indian history. He wisely so separated national hard power from the national soft power. Baba Saheb knew if PM or defense minister are given total command authority over military it will give rise to many civilian dictators.  Therefore under this article if read clubbed with article 74, the political direction to military comes from cabinet headed by PM, administrative support comes from ministry of defense and military retains the authority and freedom to take military executive decisions and that is the reason precisely military is an attached organisation to the political govt. Constitutionally, military can not be subordinate to PM and his cabinet as President who is senior to PM is its head and also PM is not given command of military. In Indian democracy where PM exercises executive political authority and President is constitutional head of military, services HQ can only be integrated with civil govt and can not be merged as is the case in USA.

4. Co-relation of Article 34 on Article 52 and 74. Articles 52 and 74 do not take away the authority as vested in supreme commander of defense forces and military commanders as Silent and Invisible Custodians of Indian Democracy. There could be situation where advice of PM (aspiring to become a dictator) and his cabinet to President could be detrimental to democracy. Under article 52 and article 74, president is left with no choice except to accept their advice after one review however under article 34 supreme commander of defense forces or military commanders can exercise military authority as vested in them only to defend constitution and democracy.

Question 6. Constitutionally, what are the roles of the defense forces? 

Answer

If seen in the backdrop of above constitutional provisions, the roles of Indian Defense Forces are:

1. Primary Role. To defend Indian Constitution and democracy against any of the following threats:

a. Any external aggression or threat in any form on the geo-political and economic interests of India, territories under the political control of Indian Govt and Indian constitution. The external threat may not be always in form of military invasions. It may appear in form of externally abetted political assassinations,  cyber or economic wars, threatening geo-poltical alliances or posturing etc.

b. Any internal threat endangering functioning of the constitution and democracy which may be in forms of armed rebellion or political takeover by a civilian dictator.

2. Secondary Role. To assist civil administration in maintenance of law and order and in case of natural calamities, disasters and disturbances only when requisitioned.

Please note that defenses forces can act in their secondary roles only when requisitioned. However for preforming their primary roles, no such orders or requisition are required. However as long as an elected political govt under parliamentary democracy is functioning, defense forces will always seek their political directions before any action. In case such govt seize to exist or nuke attacks have obliterated such govt or a civilian dictator has taken over violating constitution or any state govt has rebelled or any armed rebellion has seized any part of territory/ govt administration, defense forces will act under the military authority as vested in them to protect constitution and shall not wait for any political directions.

Question 7. What are the constitutional provisions for the status and service conditions of the Defense forces?

Answer
Chapter 14 of the constitution deals with “Services of the Union and States”. Though defense forces are created under articles 34 and 52, but their service conditions are constitutionally governed under this chapter. Relevant article are as under:
1. Article 309 empowers parliament to make legislation for the service conditions of various public services including defense forces.
 2. Article 310 Makes provisions for the tenure of all commissioned officers of the defense forces personals and civilian gazetted officers to be at pleasure of president. This article mentions various govt services in order of their seniority in terms of constitutional status. Officers of the defense forces are first in the seniority even ahead of civil services of the union (discontinued after independence) and All India Services (IAS, IPS, IRS, IFS etc).
Articles 311- 323 under the chapter deal with various safeguards provided to civil services and forming of Public Service Commissions.
Legal provisions for withdrawal of Pleasure of President in respect to officers of the  defense forces differ from the civil officers which  for defenses forces are further given in respective services acts, rules and also regulations.
Under article 309, various civil services acts for giving various service conditions in details like IAS acts and rules or IPS acts and rules have been framed. However in relation to defense services Govt and Parliament has chosen to remain silent and adhocism has been created. Absence of act and rules for service conditions of defense forces in detail as mandated under article 309, is the root cause of soldiers grievances. Present Defense Acts and Rules deal more with the discipline aspect of forces. The defense regulations are customs of Monarchy. India is a democracy and defense forces shall not be administered under adhoc regulations.
Question 8.  How are officers in defense forces appointed and how does their oath differ from a civil servant?
Answer

Officers of the defense forces in addition to being gazetted, are also commissioned officers. The word “commission” is mentioned in the parchment given to them at the time of their commissioning wherein they take oath of allegiance not only to the constitution as taken by civil officers but also to obey lawful command of their superior officer up in the chain of command after due observations to it being a lawful in accordance with laws of regular army.

Under this observed obedience of lawful command, duty to defend the constitution is inherent. Civilians including PM and Govt Ministers take oath of allegiance to the constitution and not to defend constitution? Few key aspect which shall be noted in appointments of defense officers are :

1. The parchment of commission is given under the printed signatures of the President authenticated by a Military General and not by any civil officer.
2. In parchment of commission, the President uses the word “ME” and not “MY GOVT” as he uses in Parliament, because the authority of military command is absolute in nature and is vested in him as supreme commander of the defense forces. Such power legally can not be delegated to any other authority. Provisions of article 74, therefore do not apply on military authority and chain of command. Army laws make nature of command legally very clear.  In case of confusion of political directions for military between President and PM, defense forces are obliged to follow orders of supreme commanders of defense forces and not PM.
3. Officers of defense forces take oath to serve anywhere in world and space, where ever they could be send by land, air and sea beyond the territories of India and where even the Indian laws do not apply? They enforce the sovereign authority of the state not only within national territories but beyond.
4. Officers are suppose to follow such orders of command which are lawful in nature. Legal validity of orders are decided by officer himself interpreting these under the law. Commissioned officers are therefore expected to use their judgment to decide legality of the orders and all illegal orders he is expected to disobey. In case commissioned officers obey illegal orders, they carry liability of criminal prosecution.
5. Officers of the defense forces by virtue of being commissioned officers, are vested with following powers
a. Military executive authority not only to impose its will using military force on any entity but also to the extend of forming govts. Military Govt in India were formed in Hyderabad, Goa and Junagarh once these were liberated and also in Bangaldesh and Jaffna Sri Lanka.
b. Judicial powers to not only give punishments to the extend of death sentence, but in certain situations confirm and execute it without any reference to any court, govt and president.
c. Powers of Magistrates are exercised by defense forces in aid to civil authority. Officers of the rank of NCOs and above  exercise such powers. Whereas in case of civil these are not below gazetted officers.
d Military Authority to command troops. Military functions based on unique concept of command.
e. Administrative powers like any civilian officers.
It could be seen from above that all functions of state for which a civil govt has different organs, in case of military are vested in commissioned officers.
Question 9. It seems somewhat confusing? General Impressions are that constitutionally IAS officers are Masters of Indian Destiny and they are even superior than other sister services like IPS, IRS and IFS? 

AnswerIf seen in backdrop of article 310, that is not correct. Over a period of time IAS officers have taken advantage of their certain appointments and closeness to politicians. Corrupt, greedy and insecure politicians have obliged them, as in elections IAS officers are appointed returning officers responsible to check validity of their nomination papers, their election canvassing activities and spending of funds. In fact it is this appointment which makes them a kind of masters of Indian Elections. It is the IAS officer as DM, who announces results of vote counting. When in multi corner elections where victory margins are thin, such officers naturally can oblige politicians. It is this relationship between politicians and IAS officers which has given unjustified advantage to IAS. In most of the democracy. No civil servant is given the responsibility of being a returning officer. In US, civil servants only oversee checks over political spending, in Pakistan, these are judicial officers who are nominated as returning officers. The present practice is harmful to Indian Democracy and parliament must take note of it? 

Nevertheless constitutionally, following shall answer the question about the correct position on the standing of officers of defense forces with officers of IAS and other All India Services :

Comparison of Constitutional Status of Defense Officers and IAS including Officers  of All India Services

1. Sovereign Executive Military Authority is an exclusive domain of military officers exercised through powers and chain of command. Under such authority nations are destroyed or made. Political directions for military actions at macro levels are given by elected govt in a functional democracy. Under article 34 defense forces have been made silent and invisible custodian of Indian democracy with a responsibility to keep it intact. No such powers in civil domain to any civil officer.

2. Authority to form political Govt is an exclusive domain of political civil Govt in a functional democracy on mandate of ‘we the people’. However in certain situations with approval of elected civil political authorities and if it doesn’t exist then own its own, officers of the defense officers form a political govt in any external captured territory and anywhere within the country. Examples are when military formed Govts in Haydrabad, Goa and Junagarh within the country and in Bangladesh and Jaffna; Sri Lanka abroad. Such govt can be led by any military officer or any other person so authorized by responsible military commander.  Adjutant General of the Army HQ is responsible for the subject. Only officers of the rank of Brigadier and above are authorized to declare formation of such govt. That is the reason rank of Brigadier was and should be equated with the appointment of secretary of Govt of India. Same is the practice world over in most democracies. No such authority is vested in any of the officers of all India services. All civil officers serve under the command of military commanders under the military govts.

3. Judicial Powers Any commissioned officer can be nominated to the military court as a Judge. Military officers of the rank of Captain and above exercise judicial powers of a session judge and can give death sentences.  In case of SGCM, an officer of the rank of Captain and above can nominate himself as judge and can give death sentence in a summary trial. He in this case can also confirm the sentence given by himself on behalf of president and give orders for its execution without reference to any court and civil authority. No right of appeal is given to the accused. Military Laws can be made applicable to civilians either by notification by central govt or under martial laws. Legal validity of the courts formed under martial laws has the sanction of Supreme Court. No such powers or authority is held by any officer of the all India services.

4. Powers of Magistrate.   Powers of magistrate is more of a civilian concept when a civilian officer is given part of executive authority of the state by virtue of he/her holding an appointment or given for a period. Military works on the concept of command where executive powers of state are inherent in powers of command of Military officers by virtue of holding commission or authority to exercise such powers. In case of military, powers of command are given down to NCO levels. In aid to civil authority military Non Commissioned Officers, has the powers to order fire.  Such orders in case of civil can only be given by a Civil magistrate. These powers are not inherent as is the case of military officers. IAS officers exercise powers of magistrate as returning officers for an election. It is this appointment which gives advantage to them to illegally oblige politicians and makes them powerful over others.

5. Administrative Powers   Exercised as authorized by defense officers as well as officers of all India services.

Please note,  IAS officers or other officers of all India services exercise executive powers of state only when they have powers of magistrate or holding a specified appointment where as executive authority of the state are inherent to all commissioned officers by virtue of they holding  commission on behalf of President. Nature of job of officers of all India services is more as administrative whereas in case of defense officers it is pre-dominantly executive. That is the reason article 310, puts officers of defense forces in senior most order than officers of all India services and other civil services. Yes it is also true constitutionally that IAS officer have no legal standing to claim seniority or preference over IPS, IRS or IFS. They present superior status is illegal and has been created with help of politicians as they are the only one who can become returning officers to conduct elections.

Question 10. The word defending the constitution are neither mentioned in Oath and Nor in commission parchment, then how are officers of the defense forces responsible for the defending the constitution?

Answer 
 
Oath of President of India has two key words. One “upholding the constitutions” and other defending it?  President takes the oath to defend constitution as supreme commander of the defense forces and the only means to defend constitution, he has are the defense forces. He therefore passes his authority to officers of the defense forces in form of commission. It is through this commission the officers of defense forces become responsible for defending the constitution by military force following lawful command. Article 34 also makes it obligatory on part of the defense forces to defend constitution.
Question 10. Civil Political Govt has authority and freedom to decide what shall be status of the defense officers and how shall they be paid? Why shall defense officers and soldiers crib?
 
Answer
 
Govt of the day is formed and functions under the broad constitutional framework. No govt or babu is above constitution and they are expected to work within the space as provided. Since 1973 govt are taking certain unconstitutional decisions and downgrading status and compensations of the the defense forces. The same is highly objectionable. Defense forces have been so far maintaining the decorum and trying to argue reason with the govt. Unfortunately the same is not yielding the result and no answers are coming from the govt?  That is main reason military veterans have taken to social media and streets.
Questions 11. Why shall Govt give answers to the military? It is communicating its decisions? Where is the problem in it? 
 
Answer
 
India is a democracy and not autocracy. Govts are answerable to the people and parliament. In case of military they need to explain reasons as by law military is not expected to obey unlawful orders. Soldiers have certain of their fundamental rights restricted it doesn’t mean they lose all other rights of a being Indian citizens? Govt carry a responsibility to reason out their grievances? It is demand of democracy.
Question 12. Why is military not going to court? After all it is an attached organisation to the govt and maintains its own identity? 
 
Answer
Defense forces surly have such options open but not exercising showing respect to democracy and hoping  that some day wisdom will prevail. After all military going against an elected govt in court might cause serious problems to the democracy. Yes some serving officers and military veterans are taking some lead but the same is also not a healthy sign.
Question 13. What are the main grievances? Can same be elaborated? 
Answer
 
Same were explained above in answer to question 4. The same is again elaborated here:
1. Considering various articles 18, 34, 52, 309 and 310 of the constitution and their authority, powers of command, roles and functions, officers of defense forces have a constitutional status and the same is superior to the senior most civil services that is IAS. Article 310 makes it very clear. Equating commissioned officers inferior to police and higher than homewards is surely humiliating. Since 1973 defense forces are actually under systematic attack from political establishment for marginalizing them. The same is likely to create a serious imbalance in power structure of the country in total violation of constitution which is fraught with serious consequences.
2. On the eve of Independence, first Govt under PM Nehru in fact had realized the problem and on recommendations of a committee, respecting constitutional status of the defense officers, certain principle of parity were laid down. The same were:
a. The status of officers of defense forces will be superior to civil services; IAS.
b. Seniority protocol between commissioned officers and IAS shall be decided based on length of service and not on the basis of rank of defense officers.
c. Compensation packages in terms of total average career take home including pension of defense forces shall be higher than civil. In case of defense officers more than IAS.
3. The above thumb rule as made under Nehru govt, respected the constitution. It was in 1973, in lust to be a dictator, Indra Gandhi tweaked above policy and cut their status and compensation drastically. The process which she started is still continuing? Now the situation is that in terms of status, defense forces are being equated to Grade B civil officers and their average career take homes are less than police and above home guard?
4. The real unrest is not OROP or some allowances here or there. Real issue is question of disparity and serious imbalances in total disregard to constitutional status of the soldiers. If a MP is respected as MP, if president is respected as president, if judges are respected as judges all as per status given in constitution than why are soldiers not being respected their constitutional status? Degrading soldiers in total disregards to constitution is nothing but direct attack on Constitution.
Question 14. PM Modi seems to be serious in resolving the issues, then why are soldiers still agitating?
 
Answer
 
Soldiers had lots of hope in Sh N Modi as he looked sincere but actions of his govt doesn’t speak the same story. Following may please be noted:
1. BJP promised a white paper on the problems and also formation of a military commission. In last 2 years nothing has happened on it?
2. After BJP formed govt, their defense minister clearly said “OROP” can not be given. Soldiers are asking salary for life. That triggered agitation. Then their Home Minister tried to break the agitation using force. A RSS leader in their first ever political darbar in Delhi, in fact as reported passed instructions to present Defense Minister in a very derogatory manner “Give them something and make them quite’?   It further aggravated problem.
3. Govt has accepted recommendations of the VII pay commission which has given a very humiliating treatment to soldiers, cutting them further in status and compensations. There are issue pending since IV, V and VI pay commissions. Nothing was addressed, rather more cuts have been implemented. It has happened for the second time, while the civilians have been given their dues, soldiers are still struggling. It is the first time in the history of India, where three services chiefs have polity declined implementation of VII pay commission till major anomalies are resolved.
4. On issue of disability govt has created yet another controversy.
5. Now fresh controversy over status parity has erupted in MOD, where civil officers of the Grade B are being treated much superior than commissioned officers.
6. On all these issues, one can notice deliberate leaks and motivated article  to defame soldiers? In VII pay commission report, an attempt has been made to put down soldiers and show them as greedy.
7. A new fund has been created for public to donate money giving and impression that as govt has no money for soldiers as nation is poor, public must pitch in donations.
Question 15. India is poor country surly she cant not pay soldiers lavishly? 
 
Answer
 
Who is asking that? India is a poor country then why to pay civilian govt employees so lavishly? Soldiers are asking to remove imbalances and restore their status maintaining the principle of parity in line  of constitutional status. Nehru Govt did make the rules.
Question 16. If govt doesn’t address the problem as seen by soldiers and tries to resolve its own way then what are the consequences? 
 
Answer
 
At first place govt shall not do that. The constitution is supreme. If govt still wishes to go ahead then better amend constitution. Make defense minister as supreme commander of defense forces, abolish article 34 and article 52 II. Amend article 310 to make defense forces junior to police forces. Make NSA as Chief of Defense Staff and stop giving commission to defense officers. Where is the problem? We live in a democracy where constitution and will of people are supreme.
But if not done, then respect the present constitution. In any case, since independence a situation has been created now where trust of soldiers in govt as the its lowest. It is a dangerous situation. A soldier who is low in his self esteem and doesn’t trust govt will have no trust in cause of his mission and moreover he will be more worried about future, safety and security of his family? Such soldiers can only deliver defeat.  Choice is of the govt and we the people.
Question 17. What is the way out? 
 
Answer
 
Well the way out is known to the govt. BJP did promise a white paper and standing military commission. In fact Supreme Court has been suggesting same to govt. Twice it has happened that SC has ordered Govt to form a standing commission and then withdrawn its orders on promise of the govt. Let this commission first publish a white paper and then take a comprehensive approach to restructure the whole model keeping constitution in mind. The real issues are only two. 1. Treating soldiers as per their constitutional status and 2. accordingly structuring a compensation model.

 


3,000 youth appear for Army exam

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, October 23

The Army said today that more than 3,000 local youths appeared for the common entrance examination (CEE) for recruitment in the Army, thus defying the separatists’ protest calls.According to an Army statement : “After successful recruitment rallies in south Kashmir’s Anantnag and north Kashmir’s Bandipora districts from September 21 to October 3 in which 3,000 candidates appeared, the last phase of the CEE was held at Anantnag in south Kashmir today in which 412 candidates from different parts of Kashmir and Ladakh appeared.”The Army said the youths had proved that they wanted to serve the nation. The Army had assisted the aspirants to prepare for the CEE by conducting their pre-recruitment training across many parts of Kashmir.


CBI registers FIR against NRI arms dealer in Embraer deal

CBI registers FIR against NRI arms dealer in Embraer deal
It is alleged that payoffs were routed through Austria and Switzerland

New Delhi, October 21

The CBI has registered an FIR against a UK-based arms dealer for allegedly taking kickbacks worth over USD 5.7 million from Brazilian company Embraer in the 2008 three-aircraft deal.CBI sources said a case had been registered against a UK-based NRI whose name had also figured in another defence deal probed by the agency.They said the kickbacks were allegedly paid in 2009 through subsidiaries of Embraer via a Singapore-based company owned by the middleman.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

It is alleged that payoffs were routed through Austria and Switzerland.They said the agency, which had registered a preliminary inquiry in September, had converted it into a regular FIR as enough prima facie material had been found by it to proceed in the case.The deal for three aircraft, which were to be used by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) for air-borne radar systems, was inked in 2008 with Embraer. A Brazilian newspaper had alleged that that the company had taken the services of middlemen to clinch deals in Saudi Arabia and India.According to defence procurement rules of India, middlemen are strictly barred in such deals.Leading Brazilian newspaper ‘Folha de Sao Paulo’ had reported that the company allegedly paid commissions to a UK-based defence agent to finalise the deal with India.The DRDO had purchased three aircraft from the company in 2008 and customised them for serving air-borne radar system known as airborne early-warning and control systems or AWACS for the Indian Air Force.The company has been under investigation by the US Justice Department since 2010 when a contract with the Dominican Republic raised the Americans’ suspicions, the report said.Since then, the investigation has widened to examine business dealings with eight more countries.After the PE was registered, Embraer had issued a statement saying, “Since 2011, Embraer has publicly reported that it has been conducting an extensive internal investigation and cooperating with the authorities on investigations regarding alleged violations of the FCPA.“The company voluntarily expanded the scope of the investigation, systematically reporting the progress of the case to the market.”“The company is not party of the legal proceedings in Brazil. Therefore, it does not have access to the information contained therein,” it had said. PTI


Post-strike excitement Invocation of Israel may fritter away gains

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been unsparing in his efforts to imbed in the country’s consciousness political ownership of the army’s action to avenge the Uri strikes. As part of that drive, the government and the BJP have shouted down any suggestions to the contrary despite occasional spanners like the Foreign Secretary’s reported admission to a Parliamentary Committee of such strikes having been carried out before.  A clarification skirted the Foreign Secretary’s main assertion and emphasises on India’s first-ever admission of such an operation. No government can pass up the opportunity to capitalise on a military operation on its watch. But the Modi government has moved on two fronts.Political appropriation of the strike is a work-in-progress but it is time to examine the government’s channeling of vast amounts of energy and resources to internationally isolate Pakistan. It didn’t require a Chinese report to mention what has been obvious. Instead of inviting SAARC to the BRICS summit, India opted for BIMSTEC that doesn’t have Pakistan.  But Modi may have queered the pitch by giving an Israel-like spin to the Indian army attack. Israel’s ways and methods of security management have always held the political Hindutva devotees in thrall. But large sections of the world see Israeli tactics as an impermanent solution that it is fated to repeat over and over again.Surely the Prime Minister’s intention was not to equate the Indian armed forces with the trigger-happy Israeli army. Israel’s military actions have created a permanent sore the world over and motivate generations of Palestinians to settle scores with a much superior enemy. It has also provided the fuel for faith-based mobilisation that we today know as political terrorism. Bangladesh, despite its overt political reliance on India, may have started feeling queasy over the Israel comparison.  As the BRICS joint declaration showed, in an era of ultra-violence, the world doesn’t really pay heed to border skirmishes.  The domestic dividend of the surgical strikes will be known in the coming assembly elections. But intemperate statements have already started diminishing the efficacy of the efforts to isolate Pakistan.


Memorials sans upkeep futile: Capt

Memorials sans upkeep futile: Capt
Pradesh Congress Committee president Capt Amarinder Singh joins party workers in cleaning the statue of Subedar Nand Singh at Fauji Chowk in Bathinda on Wednesday. PTI

Tribune News Service

Bathinda, October 19

Punjab Congress chief Capt Amarinder, whose book “Lest We Forget” has a detained mention of Subedar Nand Singh, lambasted the Badal government for “failing” to maintain his statue here.He along with party workers and leaders took upon himself the task of cleaning the statue of Victoria Cross and Maha Vir Chakra decorated Subedar Nand Singh of the 1st Sikh Regiment.He expressed anguish over the pitiable condition of the statue installed at Fauji (Shaheed) Chowk. He said there was no point in setting up memorials and installing statues if the government could not ensure their proper maintenance. He urged the Indian Army to take over the upkeep of such properties to prevent their degradation. “Our martyrs deserve no less,” he said.Himself hailing from the 1st Sikh Regiment, Amarinder described the condition of the statue as “yet another glaring instance of how little the Badals care for martyrs and their memorials.”Amarinder today met farmers at Gidderbaha, Muktsar, Bathinda and Faridkot on the third and last day of the Kisan Rath Yatra. Meanwhile, the PPCC chief claimed that there was no plan yet to enter into an alliance with the CPI.‘Will resign as MP after poll’Gidderbaha: PCC chief Capt Amarinder Singh today made it clear that he would not resign as MP for contesting the state assembly elections. “I will resign only after the results of the elections. This is the convention and I had even contested the Lok Sabha elections from Amritsar while being the MLA Patiala,” he said.