Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

Gen Zorawar Rifle Club to popularise shooting in state

Tribune News Service

Jammu, May 13

Jammu’s first civilian shooting range, General Zorawar Singh Rifle Club, aims to popularise shooting as a sport in the state. The club management had its first meeting today and want to give a platform to budding sportsperson.The club, built in the Dogra Educational Complex, Bari Brahmana, has state-of-the-art facilities constructed with the help of the J&K Rifle Association.Speaking on the occasion, former minister and club president Gulchain Singh Charak thanked Dilbagh Singh, Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), who is also president of the J&K Rifle Association, for granting the club affiliation to promote shooting as a sport in the state.“Local youth are gifted to achieve excellence in sports and this will help them to further hone their skills in this sport,” Charak said.He cited the example of Chain Singh, son of the soil from Doda district, who made his mark in the Asian Games 2014 and he is a big hope for the Rio Olympics.The 10-metre shooting range for pistol and rifle will provide national coaches to train the youth from schools and colleges, in addition to the other civilian population, who can seek membership of the club.


Killing two birds with one stone

The Chabahar Port agreement, which Modi will sign today, fits into his plans for India’s energy and maritime security, writes SHISHIR GUPTA

Atmospherics and verbal commitments may make for great photo-ops but the real litmus test of any foreign policy lies in getting down to brass tacks in terms of implementation. For Prime Minister Narendra Modi, this has been an article of faith. This is why when he took over in 2014, he reviewed India’s commitments to projects in the neighbourhood, particularly in Afghanistan and Bhutan with a view to getting them up and running. Cost over-runs and delays plagued many of them, particularly the Punatsangchu Hydroelectric Project in Bhutan. While the strategic significance of this cannot be underestimated, two other projects hobbled by the same problems caught his eye — the Chabahar Port in Iran and the Salma Dam Project (42 MW) at Herat in Afghanistan.

HT FILEToday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will sign the Chabahar Port contract and a Trilateral Transit Trade Agreement with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani (right) and Afghanistan President Ashraf GhaniSituated 72 km west of the Pakistan-China joint venture Gwadar port and on the mouth of the Persian Gulf, the Chabahar Port made its first appearance on the India-Iran bilateral map during the previous NDA regime in 2003.

The Manmohan Singh government understood the significance of the Chabahar Port. But it was shackled by fear of the US sanctions and its impact on the 2005 civilian nuclear agreement. It approved India’s investment only about a decade later when the Iran-US rapprochement became a real possibility. Modi inherited these impediments when he took office. To complicate matters, the Iranians tried to change the joint-venture partner which had been approved by the UPA.

To get the project moving, Modi set up the NDA government’s first informal group of ministers comprising finance minister Arun Jaitley, transport and shipping minister Nitin Gadkari and petroleum minister Dharmendra Pradhan with the National Security Adviser, Ajit Doval, as its coordinator. Last May, Gadkari sealed the Chabahar Port MoU with the Iran Ports and Maritime Organization, promising $85 million direct investment and $150-million credit for its development.

Today, one year later, Modi will sign the Chabahar Port contract and a Trilateral Transit Trade Agreement with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani. The contract promises an enviable number of benefits from the development and operation of two terminals and five multi-cargo berths at the Chabahar Special Economic Zone. This could become India’s trade, transport and energy hub in the coming decade. Incidentally, Modi will dedicate the Salma Dam Project in Herat next month, which is part of a rehabilitation and reconstruction project announced in 2001.

The Chabahar Port will be a game changer for India because it will provide connectivity to Afghanistan, Iran and Eurasia, strategically outflanking an intransigent Islamabad. It is also a counter to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Foreign minister Sushma Swaraj’s interest in connecting Iran’s Mashhad, near the Caspian Sea, with Zahedan, next to the Afghanistan border, via an India-built 900-km rail line with the Chabahar Port will unlock a new gateway to Central Asia and Europe, bypassing the Pakistan-China arc.

Through a Tripartite Trade and Transport Agreement, India plans to link with the Afghan highway through the Zahedan-Zaranj-Delaram route in Nimroz province to shore up Kabul and also open trade routes with Central Asian (CA) republics, particularly Tajikistan.

During his trip to the five Central Asian republics last year, Modi laid the foundation for India’s entry into the Oman-Iran-Turkmenistan-Uzbekistan Ashgabat Agreement, a multimodal deal, for transporting natural gas to the Chabahar Port, and from there through LNG ships or pipelines for energy-hungry India.

Modi intends to bring back more than the port agreement from Iran. He may also sign a contract to invest more in the Farzad B gas field, which has a potential of 9.7 trillion cubic feet of gas, which could fire the joint-venture urea fertiliser plants in the Chabahar SEZ.

India can also join the North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC) through Mashhad for trade connectivity to Russia and Europe via the Baltic states. According to NSTC studies, this route saves 60% time and 50% cost compared to the traditional sea route from India to Europe.

The Chabahar Port fits as much into Modi’s plans for energy security as with his maritime security grid with the port sitting astride the vital sea lanes of communication that supplies nearly 55% of the hydrocarbon needs of the South-East and North Asian countries, including China and Japan.

Modi’s reached out to US President Barack Obama, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to address India’s maritime security concerns in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, particularly in the contentious South China Sea.

India plans to extend its maritime reach in the area between the Persian Gulf and the Pacific with the proposed development of a deep sea port in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands with Japan’s help and the logistics support agreement with US.

Foreign policy should be the driver for economic development and this is what has been achieved with regional connectivity on India’s eastern board: Last June, New Delhi signed the Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal trade and transport agreement as part of the Saarc connectivity initiatives, even though ties with Kathmandu are yet to overcome the legacy of the previous UPA regime.

The outreach to Pakistan was based on pushing regional connectivity and a trade transit corridor to Afghanistan via the Khyber Pass. But what would have been an economic win-win for both countries has yet to fructify thanks to the fact that Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif ’s decision is still at the mercy of the army and the terror groups it backs.

Public sentiment often drives India’s Pakistan policy. But Modi, unlike his predecessor, grasped the nettle and reached out to Sharif by travelling to Raiwind in Pakistan in December. It was a brave bid to normalise ties. This was done after India supplied four Mi-25 attack helicopters to Afghanistan after mulling over what its ramifications could be for over a decade.

Instead of talking about a pan-Asian trade connectivity, Pakistan is refusing to cooperate on the terror issue.

With the Chabahar Port agreement, Modi has not only engaged with India’s long-term ally Iran but has broken through the strategic encirclement by China and Pakistan. If the future of strategic discourse hinges on maritime trade and security, India is sailing in fairly calm waters for the moment.


Heroes of 1857 revolt remembered

Ambala, May 10

The Jago Yuva Jago Manch today commemorated the sacrifice of the 1857 revolt heroes in Ambala Cantonment and appealed to the state government to start the construction of Shaheed Smarak soon.UV Singh, retired history lecturer from SD College, and a member of the manch, said the revolt started at Ambala Cantonment on May 10, but it was unfortunate that even after many years, the heroes of the revolt were unknown. Chief Minister Manhoar Lal Khattar laid the foundation stone of the Shaheed Smarak in May last year, but the construction had not started yet. He appealed to the government to start it as soon as possible.SP Singh, vice-president of the manch, said: “The school children are being taught that the 1857 revolt started from Meerut, while it has been proved by historians that the revolt started from Ambala. The Centre must take steps to change the course of history in text books.” — TNS


Five militants killed, two Army men injured in Kupwara gunfight

Five militants killed, two Army men injured in Kupwara gunfight
Army men at the encounter site in Kupwara on Saturday. A Tribune photo

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, May 21

Five unidentified militants were killed and two soldiers of the Army’s counter-insurgency units injured in a seven-hour gunfight with militants in north Kashmir’s Kupwara district today.The gunfight erupted at Check Drugmulla in Kupwara, nearly 100 km from Srinagar,  this morning when joint teams of the Special Operation Group of the J&K Police, Army’s 41 and 47 Rashtriya Rifles battalions and CRPF started a search operation after an input about the presence of militants in the area.As the search started, the militants, who were hiding in an abandoned house in the village, opened fire. As the forces retaliated, it triggered a gunfight.“In the seven-hour-long gunfight, five militants were killed. They were most probably from the Jaish-e-Mohammad,” said Deputy Inspector General of Police, north Kashmir Uttam Chand. He said it was being investigated whether the slain militants had infiltrated recently or had been active in the area.Defence spokesman Col NN Joshi said two Army men were injured in the gunfight and there condition was stable. “We recovered five weapons from the encounter site,” he said.Sources said the area was cordoned off on Friday night after an input that a group of recently infiltrated militants was hiding in the village.“The group of militants had infiltrated recently and one of the members was killed in a gunfight in the Zunreishi Chowkibal forest on May 17. They managed to escape that day and we were tracking them. We zeroed in on them at Check Drugmulla, around 25 km from the Zunrerishi encounter site,” the sources said.Kupwara had remained a key infiltration route of militants to enter the Valley. In the recent past, militants had stepped up efforts to sneak into the Valley.There were intelligence inputs that nearly 200 militants had been waiting to infiltrate from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.Sources in the security establishment said around 20 militants had infiltrated into the Valley this year till April. Last year, Union Home Ministry figures stated that 35 militants had infiltrated into Kashmir.The latest infiltration bid was foiled in north Kashmir’s Uri sector on Friday. The sources said a group of militants tried to infiltrate via Kamalkote in Uri, which witnessed a ceasefire violation by the Pakistani army four days ago.The sources said when militants were trying to sneak into the Valley, they were noticed and challenged by the Army. They fled to the Kamalkote sector without opening fire.The Army later recovered some jackets, blankets, rucksacks and other war-like stores from the area. A total of 44 militants have been killed across the Valley this year so far.


Sikh Capt America’ takes on intolerance, hate and Trump

‘Sikh Capt America’ takes on intolerance, hate and Trump
Vishavjit Singh

Washington, May 9

Donald Trump wants to make America great again, but “Sikh Captain America” feels the presumptive Republican presidential nominee is making America hate again.“Donald Trump has certainly been a candidate whose words have been alarming for someone like me, who happens to be at the front lines of bigotry in post-9/11 America,” said Vishavjit Singh, a Washington-born Sikh artist-activist in his mid-40s who occasionally transforms into “Sikh Captain America”.Singh, who is a political cartoonist, on occasions transforms into “Sikh Captain America”, a costumed soldier with a turban who fights bigotry and champions cultural understanding through public appearances and talks.As the film “Captain America: Civil War” plays at theatres, Singh drew a stark contrast between Trump and Captain America’s alter ego, Steve Rogers—two iconic New York characters born in the 1940s.“Captain America as a character would stand in complete opposition to Donald Trump and his candidacy. Today, besides the ISIS, the festering of extreme right-wing and supremacist forces at home will be targets for Captain America’s wrath,” he was quoted as saying by the Washington Post.The artist also creates cartoon campaigns, such as the “Send Sikh Note To Trump” postcard campaign, in which he and some of his fans send Trump a postcard every day “with a message focused on processing our anger inspired by his jingoistic madness into small kernels of humour and compassion”.“He might be full of himself, overstuffed with his achievements with a towering skyscraper of an ego, but even deep inside him resides seeds of benevolence,” Singh said.“I wish him well; I wish him compassion; I wish him to realise the violence of his words; I wish him a landslide loss in the elections for his own good,” he said. Captain America was born in New York during World War II, from the minds of Jewish creators and future comic-book legends Joe Simon and Jack Kirby, who introduced their super-soldier by having him deliver a haymaker to the jaw of a reeling Hitler.“Sikh Captain America” was also born in the Big Apple for socio-political reasons, as Singh was planning to attend his first New York Comic-Con as an exhibitor in the fall of 2011. “Some of my art is informed by my own experience on the streets of America and being targeted as an outsider—at times as a threat just based on my looks,” Singh said. — PTI


India could have gone nuclear as early as 1964: US intelligence

India could have gone nuclear as early as 1964: US intelligence
The 1974 Pokhran blast site being inspected by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi along with top nuclear scientists.

Washington, May 19The US intelligence community had concluded as early as 1964 that India was in a position to develop nuclear weapons, a declassified State Department report said, citing frequent change of the fuel core of the Canada-supplied reactor at Trombay.”The Indians are now in a position to begin nuclear weapons development if they chose to do so. We have no evidence, however, of a weapon research and development programme and would expect to see some if the programme existed,” the State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) said in a report on May 14, 1964.The report along with several others was published yesterday by the National Security Archive and the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Noting that the fuel core of the Canadian-Indian Reactor (CIR) at Trombay was being changed every six months, the US intelligence report had raised questions about India’s nuclear objectives.It said a six-month period was quite short for “normal research reactor operations,” but it was the optimum time for using the CIR’s spent fuel for producing weapons grade plutonium.The report said the Canadians had not established specific safeguards when they made the reactor available to India thus giving the Indians a free hand in using the newly-built Phoenix plutonium separation plant to produce the fissile material.According to the State Department report, “India’s leadership might have had nationalistic motives for building the Phoenix plant but if it wanted a nuclear weapons capability it would seek such a capability”.INR report said it had no “direct evidence” of an Indian weapons programme and believed it was “unlikely” that India had made a decision to build a bomb.Nevertheless, it was “probably no accident” that “everything the Indians (had) done so far would be compatible with a weapons programme if at some future date it appeared desirable to start one”.According to INR, India had taken the “first deliberate decision in the series leading to a nuclear weapon,” which was to have “available, on demand, unsafeguarded weapons-grade plutonium or, at the least, the capacity to produce it.”    The report said that a scholar characterised this as India’s “proliferation drift, the slow but sure moves towards the development of nuclear weapons”. —  PTI


HONOURING A HERO::::MAA TUJE SALAAM

clip

The mother and wife of sepoy Dharma Ram of Mahar Regiment receive Shaurya Chakra (posthumous) from President Pranab Mukherjee at Rashtrapati Bhavan on Saturday. Ram was honoured for saving the lives of two of his colleagues during an encounter with militants in Kashmir. He killed two ultras before succumbing to injuries during the firefight.


Pension hike for pre-2006 IAS retirees

New Delhi, May 18IAS and IPS officers, who have retired before 2006, will get a hike in pension, in addition to the arrears, as the Centre has done away with a provision of 33 years of service for earning full pension.The move comes after the Department of Pensions and Pensioners Welfare decided that the revised consolidated pension of pre-2006 pensioners shall not be lower than 50 per cent of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay even if they had served for less than 33 years at the time of retirement.Necessary orders directing authorities concerned to calculate the revised pensions in respect of Union Government pensioners, excluding retirees of three all India services have already been issued. — PTI


China irked by US official’s remark that Arunachal is an integral part of India

A U.S. official’s remark that Washington regards Arunachal Pradesh as part of India has spurred China to ask U.S. for a verification and clarification on it, reported Press Trust of India. The Chinese foreign ministry in a written response said “intervention of any third party” in the Sino-Indian border dispute will “only complicate the issue.”

On April 28, U.S. Consul General in Kolkata Craig L Hall told Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul that the US government is absolutely clear that Arunachal Pradesh is an integral part of India.

“China and India are wise and capable enough to deal with their own issue and safeguard the fundamental and long-term interests of the two peoples,” China’s foreign ministry said in its rejoinder. It added that the U.S. statement was “completely inconsistent” with the existing fact.

India holds that its 3,488 km-long border with China, called Line of Actual Control (LAC), is entirely under dispute starting from Aksai Chin in the north to Arunachal Pradesh in the east. China, however, has excluded the Aksai Chin area it occupied during the 1962 war, and confined its boundary dispute with India only to Arunachal Pradesh. It claims that the north eastern state as the southern part of its Tibet province.

“The boundary question between China and India bears on China’s territorial sovereignty and Chinese people’s sentiment,” said the ministry. It added that all the third parties must respect the history and reality concerning the boundary question and respect efforts of negotiation.

Last month, the two countries completed the 19th round of border talks by their special representatives National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and his Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi.

India’s long pending boundary dispute with China needs a fair, equitable and mutually acceptable settlement through negotiations, it said. Though the boundary is yet to be officially drawn, peace and tranquillity exists in its border towns — unlike the country’s western borders with Pakistan. This favourable condition has helped both the countries to grow their bilateral relation and development.