Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

LOOKING BACK 1971 WAR Riding the waves of bravery

The Navy contributed significantly to India’s win during the war. The bombing of the Karachi port and sinking of Pakistan submarine Ghazi, PNS Muhafiz and Khaibar and merchant ship Venus Challenge turned the tide in our favour

Vijay Mohan

Aircraft carrier INS Vikrant’s Hawker Sea Hawk bombed several coastal towns in East Pakistan, neutralising the Pakistan Air Force’s capability to retaliate

The bombing of the Karachi port and its surrounding areas by the Indian Navy during the opening days of hostilities was the most striking aspect of the naval operations during the 1971 War. The destruction of Pakistani submarine, PNS Ghazi, in Indian waters and the sinking of the Indian warship, INS Khukri, were among other key naval incidents of the war. This war also saw the Indian maritime force transform itself into a multi-dimensional force making a significant contribution to the war effort from its virtually non-existent role in the 1965 India-Pak War.The Indian Navy executed a series of covert operations on the Eastern seaboard in the last months of 1971 and effectively undertook a naval blockade in the Bay of Bengal that isolated East Pakistan and bottled up the Pakistan Navy and eight foreign merchant ships in ports.On December 4, aircraft carrier INS Vikrant was also deployed near East Pakistan and its Sea Hawk aircraft bombed several coastal towns, including Chittagong and Cox’s Bazar, which also neutralised the Pakistan Air Force’s capability to retaliate. Bombing operations were carried out over several days, hitting ships, fuel dumps and other port facilities.Pakistan had deployed the American-origin Ghazi, its only submarine capable of operating in the Bay of Bengal. It had been tasked to destroy INS Vikrant, but could not trace it. As an alternative, the submarine approached Vishakhapatnam to mine the approaches to its port. The Indian destroyer INS Rajput was deployed to counter submarine Ghazi, which reported underwater disturbances and launched depth-charges to counter it. Controversy still shrouds the submarine’s destruction. While official history claims that the submarine was sunk by the Indian Navy, some people have contended that it was destroyed due to an internal explosion while laying mines.The sinking of Ghazi was a huge setback to Pakistan, severely diminishing its ability to carry out effective operations in the Bay of Bengal and eliminating the threat posted to the Eastern Naval Command. The Indian Navy therefore decided to carry out an amphibious landing at Cox’s Bazar with the aim to cut off the line of retreat for Pakistan Army troops. On 12 December, an amphibious battalion aboard INS Vishwa Vijaya sailed from the Calcutta port and on the night of 15/16 December it landed at Cox’s Bazar.Simultaneously, on the western seaboard, the Indian Navy launched Operation Trident against Karachi on December 4, which, being the headquarters of the Pakistan Navy as well as the hub of Pakistan’s maritime trade, was a prime target and hence well defended. The strike by Indian missile boats was hugely successful, resulting in sinking of the minesweeper PNS Muhafiz, destroyer PNS Khaibar and the merchantman MV Venus Challenger which was carrying ammunition for Pakistan, while the destroyer PNS Shah Jahan was totally damaged. The missile ships also bombed the Kemari oil storage tanks of the port which were burnt and engulfed causing massive loss to the Karachi harbour.A second attack on Karachi, Operation Python, was launched on December 8, which resulted in the Panamanian vessel Gulf Star and the British ship SS Harmattan being sunk and Pakistan Navy’s Tanker PNS Dacca being heavily damaged. Most of Karachi’s oil reserves were destroyed and warehouses and naval workshops destroyed, inflicting a severe blow to Pakistan’s logistics as well as economy.On December 9, INS Khukri was lost with194 sailors, including its captain, Captain Mahendra Nath Mulla, to a Pakistani submarine off the coast of Gujarat. This is the Indian’s Navy’s only ship to have been lost in combat. In retaliation to the December 4 attack, Pakistani aircraft hit Okha harbor, damaging fuelling facilities, jetties and shooting down an Alize aircraft.India had established complete control over the sea route from the Persian Gulf to Pakistan, whose major ships were either destroyed or forced to remain in port. The Indian Navy was able to block the Karachi port and merchant traffic to and from Karachi ceased.At the end of the war, the damage to the Pakistani Navy was the loss of two destroyers, one submarine, seven gunboats, one minesweeper, three patrol crafts, 18 cargo and supply vessels, that accounted for over a third of its force, besides large-scale damage inflicted on the naval base and docks of Karachi. Three merchant ships and 10 smaller vessels were also captured.


Kashmir will be a ‘long war’, warns outgoing Northern Army chief

NEW DELHI: On his last day in office, Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda said he didn’t see an easy solution to end the Kashmir conflict, calling it a “long war” that would require a “long-term approach”.

His comments are significant as government sources predict that the conflict with home-grown militants will end soon.

A day after seven soldiers were killed in the Nagrota strike, Hooda said the situation along the LoC was not cooling down anytime soon. He warned against calling “the first shot fired against a garrison” a security lapse, saying 100% success each time in preventing attacks reflected “little understanding of the battle the army is fighting”.

“I wish we could have prevented the Nagrota strike but some setbacks have to be accepted…and we learn our lessons. We have to move on, rather than let one incident set the discourse for overall national security,” he said.

Sixty soldiers have died in J&K this year. Hooda said the army was ruthless about finding ways to minimise casualties. “We understand this more than anyone else because our lives depend on it.” On the alleged lapses that may have led to the attack, he said, “Two officers deliberately put themselves in the line of fire to rescue women and children. Let us respect that rather than sitting in peaceful areas and mouthing criticism.” He added that alleging lapses before carrying out a detailed analysis “dilutes what soldiers are doing on the ground”.

Hooda said the army moved swiftly to kill the militants who attacked the Nagrota base or else it could have been worse than the Uri attack in which 19 soldiers were killed. He rubbished reports about actionable intelligence being available on the Nagrota attack. “We launch hundreds of operations in J&K daily on the basis of intelligence inputs. In this case, we had no specific inputs.”

He said there was an urgent need to tap smart technologies for perimeter protection of military bases to complement human effort.


Kanpur train mishap: Kin seek martyr’s status for lieutenant

Ravinder Saini

Tribune News Service

Jhajjar, November 22

Mortal remains of Lieutenant Sandeep Chahar (24), who died in the Kanpur train mishap, were consigned to flames at his native Silani village today with full military and police honour.Jhajjar SDM Pradeep Kaushik and DSP Rajiv Kumar attended the last rites to pay tributes to the martyr.Pradeep Chahar, Sandeep’s younger brother, lit the pyre in presence of a significant number of people from surrounding villages.Earlier, Sandeep’s body was brought to Silani village by Army personnel in an ambulance from Delhi.Talking to mediapersons, Honorary Captain (Retd) Jagdish Chahar, Sandeep’s grandfather, demanded the state government to accord a status of martyr to his grandson, stating he was on duty when the mishap took place.Dharampal Chahar, Sandeep’s father, said, “We want nothing but respect for our son which is given to a martyr.”


Northern Command bids farewell to Gen Hooda

Northern Command bids farewell to Gen Hooda
General Officer Commanding-in-Chief (GOC-in-C), Lt Gen DS Hooda

Tribune News Service

Jammu, November 29

The Northern Command today bid adieu to its General Officer Commanding-in-Chief (GOC-in-C), Lt Gen DS Hooda, who retiring after an illustrious career of 40 years. The General had taken over the command of the prestigious Northern Command on July 1, 2014.In his farewell address, the General paid rich tributes to the martyrs who have laid down their lives in the service of the nation and exhorted all ranks to continue to work with the same zeal and motivation to overcome the numerous challenges of combating terrorism, proxy war and external threats.General Hooda stressed upon the concept of “unlimited liability” associated with the profession of arms and the subtle difference of military profession from others. He emphasised the need to strengthen military ethos and stressed upon the increased responsibility that officers have towards the men they command.He appreciated efforts of all ranks for their immense professionalism and dedication in carrying out their tasks in trying conditions at the LoC/LAC and in counter-terrorists operations. He highlighted the immense contribution and cooperation of the IAF while carrying out various operations in the command theatre. He also complimented and thanked the civil administration and CAPF for the excellent synergy with the Army in pursuit of common goal of establishing “peace and tranquillity” in J&K.The General laid a wreath at Dhruva War Memorial to pay his tributes to the brave martyrs of the Northern Command.The Northern Command PRO said all officers, JCOs and men in Northern Command and the entire Indian Army would remember him fondly as an illustrious intellectual General.


IAF assesses how sleep deprivation hits fighter pilots

NEW DELHI: The Indian Air Force is experimenting with the sleeping pattern of its fighter pilots to find out how fatigue affects flight performance in an unforgiving environment.

AP FILEA study conducted on 40 fighter pilots reveals significant deviations in performance due to lack of sleep.

A sleep deprivation study conducted on 40 fighter pilots has revealed significant deviations in their performance and now the IAF will kick off field studies on a larger scale, officers familiar with the research told Hindustan Times.

Insufficient sleep can lead to increased error rates, decreased levels of alertness and lapses in judgment.

The experiment is being conducted by the IAF’s Institute of Aerospace Medicine and Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences.

Several international air forces including those of US, UK and Germany have conducted such studies to improve flight safety and come up with countermeasures for fatigue.

“Subjects are not allowed to sleep when they normally do and tested on various flight parameters. And then they are tested again in a well-rested state,” said an IAF officer, involved in the study.

“We have observed noticeable deviation from optimal flight performance.

The IAF is using a monitoring system developed by IIT Kharagpur to assess how fatigue impairs performance.

The system is similar to psychomotor vigilance task monitor used globally for measuring reaction time of pilots under different stages of sleep deprivation, said an aviation medicine specialist.

“We want to develop a system that allows us to quickly assess if a pilot is fatigued during the morning briefing. Fighter pilots have to stay sharp at all times,” said a senior IAF officer.

The scope of the IAF study will also cover the effects of “go pills” and “no-go pills” that Indian fighter pilots are authorised to use during training for specific combat missions.

The IAF allows its fighter pilots to use Modafinil, a “go pill” that helps them stay alert and focused during long sorties.

They can also pop Zolpidem, a “no-go pill” used to promote sleep after demanding day-night missions.

“The idea is to send a fully alert fighter pilot to the cockpit and be aware of his sleep pattern and the effects of pills on his performance,” said Air Marshal Pawan Kapoor, who heads the IAF’s medical wing.

4 Army men injured as Pak violates truce

Jammu, November 20

Four Army jawans were injured as the Pakistani army resorted to heavy cross-border firing in Rajouri sector of Jammu and Kashmir tonight, in third ceasefire violation since yesterday.”The Pakistani army resorted to heavy cross-border firing in the Rajouri sector, in which four of our soldiers have been injured,” an Army officer said.He said the Army was giving a befitting response to the Pakistani fire and the exchange of fire was going on till the last reports came in.Today’s violation of the ceasefire came a day after a BSF jawan and a woman were injured when Pakistani troops targeted Indian posts and civilian areas in Nowshera and Sunderbani sectors of Rajouri. — PTI


‘LIKELIHOOD OF PAK USING N-WEAPONS HAS INCREASED’

NEW DELHI: Former national security adviser (NSA) Shivshankar Menon has warned that the likelihood of Pakistan using tactical nuclear weapons against India has increased, which has given rise to the possibility of an all-out nuclear war between the neighbours.

Menon told a TV channel that power to use tactical nukes would be devolved to lower ranking officers in the Pakistani Army that is “increasingly religiously motivated and less professional”. He said the Pakistan Army had “consistently produced rogue officers staged coups against its own leaders”.

He indicated the use of tactical nukes by Pakistan could lead to a full-fledged nuclear conflict when India decides to mount a massive retaliation of its own.

Commenting on defence minister Manohar Parrikar’s questioning of India’s ‘no first use’ policy, Menon said the minister didn’t have a right to articulate his personal opinion on nuclear policy in public, particularly when it contradicted the country’s official policy.

He said Parrikar’s suggestion would not be in India’s interest, adding that threatening a nuclear response to a terror strike from Pakistan would be like “threatening to kill a mosquito with a shotgun”.

Menon, who was India’s foreign secretary when the 26/11 Mumbai attack took place, said he was all for “immediate visible retaliation of some sort” after the attack. He said he had pressed for action against “LeT in Muridke or their camps in PoK or against the ISI, which was clearly complicit”.

Men on said he then believed that retaliation would be “emotionally satisfying” and also go some way toward “erasing the shame of the incompetence that India’s police and security agencies displayed.” He said then foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee seemed to agree with him but didn’t reveal then PM Manmohan Singh’s response.


Here’s All You Need To Know About Gen Bajwa, The New Pak Army Chief by Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain –

Here’s All You Need To Know About Gen Bajwa, The New Pak Army Chief

SNAPSHOT

Pakistani Army chief General Raheel Sharif’s exit brings General Qamar Javed Bajwa to the hot seat, and therefore, throws up yet another challenge for Indian analysts, to predict what course the new boss will follow.

So, finally Pakistani Army chief General Raheel Sharif did decide to go home. An extension would have given him two or three years more in uniform. Outside the uniform, he can aspire for much more, perhaps even a political career. Seldom has a Pakistan Army chief worked so assiduously on his personal image and used all elements of state to project that. His achievements were plastered all over the media and the Inter-Service Public Relations pulled out the stops; it led to Gen Raheel’s posters being pasted even behind Karachi’s rickshaws, in a city he helped partially clean up of its criminal and terror mess.

His exit brings General Qamar Javed Bajwa to the hot seat, and therefore, throws up yet another challenge for Indian analysts, to predict what course the new boss will follow. Predictably, analysts on our side are already reading far more than is evident. Predictions of being Nawaz Sharif’s man, who helped him survive the attempt by Imran Khan to conduct a civilian coup, are doing the rounds. Much weightage is being given to the Kashmir record because of the current impasse along the Line of Control (LoC), and the possibility that he will follow a very proactive approach towards Kashmir.

All the above are furthest from the truth. The Pakistan Army is professional and extremely strategic in its orientation. Its prime concern is itself and its power. It is not going to give a woolly-headed Prime Minister the space to rejig himself into a dominant position to dictate to the generals. So, Gen Bajwa is nobody’s man, but his own and that of the Pakistan Army. Right from 1977, when Gen Zia ul Haq spelt out his diabolical plan for retribution against India, the core of Pakistan Army’s existence, it has always been in the dominant position that must be occupied in Pakistan’s polity, either directly or indirectly.

Gen Pervez Musharraf assumed full power and later restored civilian rule. His successors have been refining the hold of the Pakistan Army over the country’s polity and governance; projecting diluted control and in actual effect assuming more power. The master of this was Gen Raheel Sharif. To assume that Gen Bajwa will roll it all back is a figment of someone’s imagination. Yet reasonable space could be accorded to him to view the situation with rationale.

A little about the new incumbent. The Pakistan media hardly delves into personal details, but we know that Gen Bajwa is a second-generation infantryman from Baluch Regiment, like three previous chiefs, Yahya, Aslam Beg and Kayani. The general is called apolitical by the Pakistan media which is also being repeated by the Indian media; the assumption is beyond reason. He is from the October 1980 batch of the Pakistan Military Academy, Kakul. The same as Gen Zubair Hayat, who has been appointed the chairman of joint chiefs of staff committee, except that he is junior in number. Gen Hayat was the Director General of the Strategic Plans Division, which oversees Pakistan’s nuclear assets from the military angle, an appointment far more important than the one held by Gen Bajwa (Inspector General Training and Evaluation, virtually the DGMT of the Pakistan Army). He later became the Chief of the General Staff as a Principal Staff Officer having the DGMO under him, and therefore has experience in the handling of operations at the strategic level. Academically, the two general officers have matching profiles; Gen Hayat being a graduate from Staff College Camberlay, UK and Gen Bajwa from Staff College Toronto, Canada. The latter later attended the Naval Post Graduate School at Monteray Bay, US. Internationally too, he has greater experience having commanded a Pakistan Army Brigade in South Kivu in Congo as part of the UN mission there.

Given his international experience, good academic record with exposure abroad and the record of service in Kashmir, Gen Bajwa was a natural choice as Chief for the Pakistan Army. The general has had three tenures in Pakistan’s 10 Corps; as Chief of Staff at the Headquarters, GOC Force Command Northern Areas, which also looks after Pakistan’s glaciated terrain opposite our deployment in Siachen and Saltoro ridge, and as GOC 10 Corps (Pakistan’s Kashmir Corps). However, the recent crop of senior officers of the Pakistan Army have all been blooded in serious battles with Islamic radical terrorists in the North West or in other internal security duties.

Gen Bajwa does not have that experience but is reputed to believe that the threat from radicals is far more serious than from India. That is in the same mold as Gen Kayani and Gen Raheel Sharif. However, no Pakistan Army senior officer is going to blatantly talk of targeting India except as reaction. Gen Raheel Sharif has been using some very aggressive language off late as his date for departure approached. Gen Bajwa could be forced to follow suit considering that the temperature at the LoC is extremely high. The Indian media’s remarks that the Pakistani Army is virtually suing for peace after the heavy crunch of response through fire assaults by the Indian Army, will not be helpful. Maturity of a general is displayed, when he does not play to the galleries. Watching former Indian Army Chief General Bikram Singh praise his earlier subordinate in the UN mission in Congo and accepting the reality that he needed to work for his nation’s interests was display of what may be called military respect and magnanimity. Rhetoric is something which has become so common place in the India-Pakistan narrative that one would like to see Gen Bajwa change the tone and tenor. If he does, he probably will give indicators of what will form the essence of his doctrine at the LoC.

Gen Raheel Sharif’s positive legacy has been the manner in which he went after the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) and TTP even as he embarked on cleaning up Karachi. These organisations are not down and out and would be looking to rearing their heads again. They would be assessing the commitment, understanding and energy that Gen Bajwa brings to the appointment. Any leeway and they would seek to exploit. In the light of this situation, the reported shifting of forces (two divisions worth) to the eastern front may not sound so prudent. Yet, Gen Bajwa cannot be as bold as to rescind an order of his previous chief. Those decisions will all be respected.

General Bajwa takes over an army far more experienced in hybrid operations than it was a few years ago. Gen Raheel Sharif did bring his imposing personality to the arena of irregular operations and took some robust decisions. His successor will follow suit by the sheer kinetic energy set in motion by Gen Raheel. However, Gen Bajwa comes at a time, when equations and axes are also changing.

First, the Chinese are increasingly looking at the China Pakistan Economic Corridor with a more serious intent. They would not want Gilgit-Baltistan in greater tension, neither Baluchistan. But if the current tensions with India only get worse India is going to play both cards; diluting of tension in J&K is therefore in Pakistan’s interest.

Secondly, the US appears to be ignoring Pakistan as its strategic interests shift. With President-elect Donald Trump’s likely isolationist policy, Pakistan’s significance will further dilute. It is only nations with whom economics and business will be strong, that US is likely to strengthen relations and India is one of them. Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan is not improving and the Taliban in Afghanistan are under no one’s control. That means continuation of Pakistan’s dwindling strategic space and India’s continuing influence.

Thirdly, the positive on the horizon is the improving relationship with the Russians and feasibility of some weapons and equipment from that source. The Russians too may not be too happy to see their weapons in use against India with whom it still has a strong strategic relationship.

Thus from every count an improvement in relationship with India is called for. It won’t happen with loss of any pride to the Pakistan Army. Gen Bajwa may after initial briefings and unbiased review realise the above. If offered tactical escape routes without loss of pride we could yet see the LoC tension drawing down. The need may be to reduce rhetoric from our side too to allow this to take place.

Usually machismo may demand false military notions of domination etc and some robust trans-LoC exchanges as the new Pakistan Army chief takes over. It would be in everyone’s interest if some time is given to Gen Bajwa to make his assessment, send messages through the hotline that Pakistan may wish to re-appraise its policy vis-a-vis the LoC and await response. I think there may be a chance that Gen Bajwa may just turn out to be different. The experience as GOC 10 Corps may have tempered him into the futility of the breaches of ceasefire. To expect anything on the sponsorship of proxy war may be a little too much; one step at a time will be a good policy.

Lastly, rumours that an Ahmadiya connection of a remote relative almost scuttled Gen Bajwa’s chances can be dismissed as mere speculation. Pakistan has had Ahmadiya generals before although Gen Bajwa is far from being one.

8

The writer is a former GOC of India’s Srinagar based 15 Corps, now associated with Vivekanand International Foundation and the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.

Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM, SM, VSM and BAR, is one of India’s most decorated military officers. He retired in 2013 as the Military Secretary, after 40 years of service in the Indian armed forces. Prior to that, he had been specially inducted back to Srinagar to command the strategic 15 Corps to restore order when the three-year agitation in the streets went out of order. In his long career, he has served in Sri Lanka with the IPKF; in Punjab, during the heyday of militancy; in India’s North-eastern states, and in seven tenures of duty in Jammu & Kashmir. He also commanded his unit in Siachen Glacier. 


No Indian submarine chased out by Pak warships: Navy

No Indian submarine chased out by Pak warships: Navy
Thinkstock photo, only for illustrative purpose

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, November 18

Indian Navy on Friday dismissed reports that its submarines were chased away by Pakistan warships, as some reports by the neighbour’s media had claimed.

Indian Navy spokesperson Capt DK Sharma said that none of its submarines was in Pakistan’s waters and, therefore, there was no question of being driven out.

A Pakistan Navy spokesman said the Indian submarines were detected near Pakistan’s territorial waters but had been pushed back.

“The Indian Navy, in order to fulfil its nefarious designs, was deploying submarines. The Pakistan Navy, alert and using its extreme skill, prevented Indian submarines from entering Pakistani waters,” the Pakistan Navy spokesman said in a statement. “Pakistan Navy fleet units detected the presence of Indian submarines in the southern parts of Pakistani waters…and restricted their activity.”

Territorial waters are defined as 12 nautical miles (22.2kms) from shore. (With inputs from PTI)

Pak says it ‘drove out’ Indian sub

New Delhi denies claim as tension between neighbours reaches Arabian Sea

Pak says it ‘drove out’ Indian sub

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, November 18

The India-Pakistan tension today shifted from Jammu and Kashmir to Arabian Sea where Islamabad and Beijing have been conducting a naval exercise. Pakistan claimed to have “detected” an Indian submarine, which had “violated the sea limits” and said it was “driven back”, a claim New Delhi vehemently denied.   The Indian Navy refused to accept that its submarine had entered the territorial waters of Pakistan-that is 12 nautical miles (some 22 km) from the shore.Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) realised a video and pictures of a diesel-electric powered submarine while “breathing” or “snorting” (showing its periscope and masts above sea level even when the vessel is submerged and charging its batteries). The pictures and video indicate that the shots were from an infra-red camera or sensor, signifying these were captured at night from either a warship or a low-flying drone.This, Pakistan claimed, was an Indian submarine, which had entered Pakistan’s waters.  India operates two varieties of the diesel-electric submarine-Russian-origin Kilo class and German-origin HDW. India’s nuclear-powered submarine INS Chakra would not need to “snort” as a nuclear vessel need not charge its batteries at sea.ISPR said, “(Indian) submarine was deployed within Pakistani waters to secretly sneak into Pakistani limits; however, it was successfully traced”.  Meanwhile, the Pakistan-China navy exercise would enter its ‘marine drill phase’ tomorrow. 

Pakistan claims it ‘blocked’ Indian sub, New Delhi denies

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Navy said on Friday it had “blocked” an Indian submarine from entering the country’s territorial waters, though officials in New Delhi described the claim as “blatant lies”.

AFP FILEThe Pakistani Navy said the submarine was detected “south of the Pakistani coast” on Monday.

“The Pakistan Navy once again proved its vigilance and operational competence by detecting and blocking an Indian submarine from entering in Pakistani waters,” an official statement said.

“The unsuspecting submarine was detected and localised south of Pakistani coast on November 16. Thereafter, despite submarine’s desperate efforts to escape detection, it was continuously tracked by Pakistan Navy fleet units and pushed well clear of our waters,” the statement said. The detection of the Indian submarine reflected the Pakistan Navy’s anti-submarine warfare capabilities, it added. The navy also released footage and photographs of what it was said was the submarine trying to enter Pakistani waters.

In New Delhi, Indian Navy officials described the Pakistani claim as “blatant lies” and said none of its vessels were in that area. Security analyst Admiral (retired) Tasnim Ahmad told the media the submarine had been in Pakistani waters for more than four days. He said the vessel left Pakistani waters after being detected. Earlier this week, the Pakistan Navy announced that the first cargo containers for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) were safely escorted in the Arabian Sea towards their destinations in Middle Eastern and African countries.

It said the success of the CPEC and Gwadar port project was linked to a safe and secure maritime environment in the Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea.


Army truck mows down 12-yr-old girl

Tribune News Service

Ambala, November 26

Gunjan(12), a resident of Mahesh Nagar, was mowed down by an Army truck at Parshuram Chowk in Ambala Cantonment today. The victim was reportedly returning home from school along with her cousins, when their motorbike was hit by the truck. She died on the spot. The truck driver fled the spot.Later, kin of the deceased kept the body on the road and tried to block the Ambala-Jagadhri road. They alleged the police were trying to protect the accused as the truck belonged to the Army.They lifted the road blockade after seeing a copy of FIR. Deputy Superintendent of Police Suresh Kaushik said the truck driver had been booked under sections 279 and 304A of the IPC. He said the Army officials concerned had been informed about the situation and efforts were being made to nab the driver.