Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Defence Related News

Mohit to play a soldier

Mohit to play a soldier
Historical moment: Mohit Raina

Looks like the entire entertainment industry is inspired to make content on the Battle of Saragarhi! While Akshay Kumar has announced Kesari, Ajay Devgn and Randeep Hooda are also set for films on the same concept. And now, we have a TV show too! In the upcoming show, 21 Sarfarosh: Saragarhi 1897, actor Mohit Raina will be playing the lead. The actor, who was seen playing roles in historical and mythological shows till date, will now be back on screens as soldier Havildar Ishar Singh. Mohit will be seen in his new avatar on Discovery JEET channel, which is scheduled to launch in early 2018. On Friday, the makers released the first look of Mohit as a soldier in the much-awaited show. 21 Sarfarosh: Saragarhi 1897 is a fiction show inspired by the real-life story of 21 brave soldiers of 36th Sikh regiment of the British Indian Army which defended an army outpost at Saragarhi in the North-West Frontier Province against an onslaught by over 10,000 Pashtun and Orakzai tribals in September 1897. 


Indian troops are aggressive along border, says PLA

BOTH THE INDIAN ARMY AND ITBP COMMANDERS HAVE RUBBISHED THE ALLEGATION, SAYING THAT IT WAS THE PLA TROOPERS WHO WERE AGGRESSIVE

NEW DELHI: Despite India and China calling truce along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) after the Special Representative dialogue, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has virtually accused its Indian counterpart of being aggressive although no shot has been fired in 40 years.

The December 22 SR level meeting was the first after the 73-day standoff between India and Chinese PLA was resolved on August 28.

The PLA spokesperson’s statement on Thursday that India should “strictly control” its border troops stems from the August 15, 2017 fisticuffs between the Indian Army and its Chinese counterpart in the Pangong Tso sector.

Before going public, the PLA had made it known through diplomatic channels that its troops had sustained injuries during physical contact with Indian forces during LAC patrolling and claimed that Indian troops were showing undue aggression as if it was “the border with Pakistan”.

However, both the Indian Army and Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) commanders have rubbished the allegation, saying it was PLA troopers who were aggressive and were found to be carrying iron rods and sticks during the Pangong Tso incident.

According to senior officials, Indian troops were sensitive to the requirements of LAC patrolling and were committed to maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border.

The PLA first raised this issue at a Track II dialogue at Chengdu this year, where a senior Chinese Army commander told the participating Indian delegation that New Delhi should not be posting troops “from Pakistan border” to the 3,488-km LAC as they “were found to be very aggressive”.

The commander said the PLA posted its troops to the LAC after sensitising them on the needs of the border with India. He hinted that aggressive troop posturing by Indian commanders could lead to a vertical escalation, which would be detrimental to bilateral relations.

While the PLA statement does not wash with the Indian Army or ITBP, Chinese State Councillor and CCP Politburo member Yang Jiechi was conciliatory with his Indian counterpart and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval during the SR level boundary talks.

According those privy to the talks, the Chinese plate was full with ongoing North Korean and South China Sea crisis and, hence, were all for maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border. The Indian side reciprocated the gesture even though the actual resolution of the India-China boundary is far away.

At the SR level talks, both sides emphasised on the need for the two countries to remain in touch with lines of communication open between the top leadership of India and China and ensure that a Doklam-like situation is not repeated.


Slain soldier’s family hails Army action against Pakistan

Slain soldier’s family hails Army action against Pakistan
Sepoy Pargat Singh.

Parveen Arora

Tribune News Service

Karnal, December 26

Family members of Sepoy Pargat Singh, who was killed on Saturday in a ceasefire violation in Keri sector in Rajouri district, have hailed the Indian Army action in which three soldiers of Pakistan Army have been killed.They urged the Indian Army and Union government to continue such kind of retaliation to take revenge of the supreme sacrifice of the Indian soldiers.“I have lost my son who had made supreme sacrifice for the country, but I do not want that mothers like me and wives like my daughter-in-law should suffer any more, so the Indian Army and the Union government should continue such retaliatory action till terrorism is uprooted,” said Sukhwinder Kaur, mother of Pargat Singh.Hailing the action taken by the Indian Army, she said, “I appreciate the reply by the Indian forces to Pakistan, but still there is a need of a stringent action.”“The action from our side should be continued. The government should give a free hand and should not stop the Indian Army from taking any kind of action against Pakistan,” she maintained.Raising anti-Pakistan slogans at his residence, Pargat’s son Yuvraj Singh showed his willingness to join Indian Army to take the revenge of his father. “I will join the Army and will take avenge my father’s killing,” said Yuvraj.Pargat Singh’s wife Ramanpreet Kaur said, “I appreciate the retaliation by my solider brothers as Pakistan deserves such kind of action. It understands the language of bullet and not love.”“I am proud of my husband’s sacrifice. He wanted to make Yuvraj a top official. I will send my son to the Army,” she said.


Char Sahibzade to feature in NCERT history books DSGMC gen secy Sirsa had raised issue with Prime Minister

Char Sahibzade to feature in NCERT history books
Children participate in a turban tying competition organised in remembrance of Char Sahibzade in Amritsar. — File photo

Syed Ali Ahmed

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, December 22

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has agreed to consider inclusion of a chapter on Char Sahibzade of 10th Sikh Master Guru Gobind Singh in its syllabi from next year.This was communicated to Manjinder Singh Sirsa, Delhi MLA and general secretary of the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) by the NCERT. Sirsa had raised the issue with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.In a communique written to Sirsa on the issue, Secretary of the NCERT Major Harsh Kumar stated that the Director, NCERT, had appreciated the concern of Sirsa regarding inclusion of a chapter on Char Sahibzade for their unparalleled valour and supreme sacrifice in the country.The secretary informed that new policy of education was in progress which would give direction for development of national curriculum framework, syllabi and curricular material for schools, Sirsa said.Harsh Kumar said Sirsa’s suggestion would be placed before the expert committee before finalising syllabi and curricular material for social science in general and history in particular.Sirsa said his mission was to get the next generation aware of the supreme sacrifice made by four Sahibzade for the nation and humanity. There was no parallel in the world of the sacrifice they made at such a tender age.Sirsa also urged all the education boards of different states to include chapters on history of the supreme sacrifice in their syllabi so that children studying in these states could get acquainted with these incidents of historical importance.


Spectrum, scandals & scams 2G verdict has massive political ramifications

Spectrum, scandals & scams

IN acquitting former Telecom minister, A Raja, Ms Kanimozhi and all other accused in the “2G scam”, the Special CBI court at Patiala House has introduced a spicy flavour to the national political curry. To the extent, 2G had become emblematic of a supposedly corrupt government and a broken down political economy, the Special CBI court verdict is bound to energise the discredited UPA crowd, as also take the bite out of PM Modi’s messianic proclamations against the corrupt. Coming close on the heels of an honourable electoral draw in Gujarat, the political equations are poised to be redefined. Suddenly, the sinners are looking less than sinners and the saints no longer come across so saintly.The CBI has done a shoddy job but it will find its institutional arm twisted to ensure that an appeal got filed against the Special Court’s judgment. Judge Saini’s magisterial dismissal of the prosecution case as nothing more than “rumour, gossip and speculation” goes to the very heart of the infirmities that have come to overload our public institutions. His elaboration that “public perception has no place in judicial proceedings” is a bracing slap across the face of many in superior judiciary who tend to work “national conscience” and similar perceptual constructs into their judicial reasoning.A war of words has predictably broken out between the UPA and the NDA partisans and practitioners over the verdict and its political ramifications. That war among politicians will continue and only intensify till 2019. But there are significant lessons for all those who preside over our institutions. The former CAG, Vinod Rai, ought to be the most chastened man in India. His twisted logic produced a figure of Rs 1.76 trillion loss to the national exchequer. This was only a notional loss but it lodged itself in the national imagination as an act of ethical wrong-doing on a gigantic scale. Arguably, the process was abused by the politician-bureaucratic axis, but Vinod Rai too did not play by the book. He subjected the polity to great convulsions; in the process, the nation got a bad name globally, resulting in huge — unquantifiable — losses in terms of businesses and investment withheld. Many more reputations and myths would come unravelling.


POWs in Pakistan

Amritsar: On the anniversary of the 1971 India-Pakistan war, veteran BJP leader Laxmi Kanta Chawla has asked the Narendra Modi government to make public the exact number of Indian Prisoners of War (POWs) in Pakistan and reveal their identity. She said the Indian forces had won a historic battle by capturing about 1,00,000 soldiers of Pakistan in the 1971 war. The then Indian Government had released all those soldiers and sent them back to their native country.  She said all Indian leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, celebrated Vijay Divas with pride.  However, the country had failed to bring back the Indian POWs till date, she remarked. She called upon the government to make public the exact number of POWs in Pakistani jails. TNS

THE FORGOTTEN 54 –

As we celebrate the 45th anniversary of a landmark event in modern history,  there are 54 families for whom the war and the waiting never ended. The agonizing wait goes on to this day. These are the families of the 54 Indian prisoners of war (PoW) who were never released by Pakistan after the war. Their names are as follows:
Indian Army
1.       Major SPS Waraich IC-12712 15 Punjab
2.       Major Kanwaljit Singh Sandhu IC-14590 15 Punjab
3.       2/Lt Sudhir Mohan Sabharwal SS-23957 87 Lt Regiment
4.       Capt Ravinder Kaura SS-20095 39 Med Regiment
5.       Capt Giri Raj Singh IC-23283 5 Assam
6.       Capt Om Prakash Dalal SS-22536 Grenadiers
7.       Maj AK Ghosh IC-18790 15 Rajput
8.       Maj AK Suri SS-19807 5 Assam
9.       Capt Kalyan Singh Rathod IC-28148 5 Assam
10.   Major Jaskiran Singh Malik IC-14457 8 Raj. Rifles
11.   Major SC Guleri IC-20230 9 Jat
12.   Lt Vijay Kumar Azad IC-58589 1/9 G R
13.   Capt Kamal Bakshi IC-19294 5 Sikh
14.   2/ Lt Paras Ram Sharma SS-22490 5/8 G R
15.   Capt Vashisht Nath
16.   L/Hv. Krishna Lal Sharma 13719585 1 JAK RIF
17.   Subedar Assa Singh JC-41339 5 Sikh
18.   Subedar Kalidas JC-59 8 JAKLI
19.   L/Nk Jagdish Raj 9208735 Mahar Regiment
20.   L/Nk Hazoora Singh 682211303
21.   Gunner Sujan Singh 1146819 14 Fd Regiment
22.   Sepoy Daler Singh 2461830 15 Punjab
23.   Gnr Pal Singh 1239603 181 Lt Regiment
24.   Sepoy Jagir Singh 2459087 16 Punjab
25.   Gnr Madan Mohan 1157419 94 Mountain Regiment
26.   Gnr Gyan Chand Gnr Shyam Singh
27.   L/Nk Balbir Singh S B S Chauhan
28.   Capt DS Jamwal 81 Field Regiment
29.   Capt Washisht Nath Attock
Indian Air Force
 30.   Sq Ldr Mohinder Kumar Jain 5327-F(P) 27 Sqn
31.   Flt Lt Sudhir Kumar Goswami 8956-F(P) 5 Sqn
32.   Flying Officer Sudhir Tyagi 10871-F(P) 27 Sqn
33.   Flt Lt Vijay Vasant Tambay 7662 –F(P) 32 Sqn
34.   Flt Lt Nagaswami Shanker 9773-F(P) 32 Sqn
35.   Flt Lt Ram Metharam Advani 7812-F(P) JBCU
36.   Flt Lt Manohar Purohit 10249(N) 5 Sqn
37.   Flt Lt Tanmaya Singh Dandoss 8160-F(P) 26 Sqn
38.   Wg Cdr Hersern Singh Gill 4657-F(P) 47 Sqn
39.   Flt Lt Babul Guha 5105-F(P)
40.   Flt Lt Suresh Chander Sandal 8659-F(P) 35 Sqn
41.   Sqn. Ldr. Jal Manikshaw Mistry 5006-F(P)
42.   Flt Lt Harvinder Singh 9441-F(P) 222 Sqn
43.   Sqn Ldr Jatinder Das Kumar 4896-F(P) 3 Sqn
44.   Flt Lt LM Sassoon 7419-F(P) JBCU
45.   Flt Lt Kushalpal Singh Nanda 7819-F(N) 35 Sqn
46.   Flg Offr. Krishan L Malkani 10576-F(P) 27 Sqn
47.   Flt Lt Ashok Balwant Dhavale 9030-F(P) 1 Sqn
48.   Flt Lt Shrikant C Mahajan 10239-F(P) 5 Sqn
49.   Flt Lt Gurdev Singh Rai 9015-F(P) 27 Sqn
50.   Flt Lt Ramesh G Kadam 8404-F(P) TACDE
51.   Flg Offr. KP Murlidharan 10575-F(P) 20 Sqn
52.   Sqn Ldr Devaprasad Chatterjee
53.   Plt Offr Tejinder Singh Sethi
 Indian Navy
54.   Lt. Cdr Ashok Roy
Every single name that you read here is a soldier who fought for India. They were captured in action and spent the rest of their lives rotting in Pakistani jails. Can you imagine the type of mental agony that they must have undergone there? They must have lived in hope that one day they will be released and slowly the hope faded away. It has been 45 years. How many of them will be alive and in what condition? What kind of miserable existence they must have endured over there? What kind of physical and mental torture they must have endured there?
Imagine a loved one from your family in that position. What do you feel? Multiply that feeling a thousand times over. That is what these 54 families have felt every day for the last 45 years.

The evidence

There is ample evidence for the existence of these 54 prisoners in the Pakistani jails. Consider some of the evidence:-
·         Then on December 26, 1974, R.S. Suri received a hand-written note dated December 7, 1974 from his son. The letter contained a slip in which his son had written, “I am okay here.” The covering note read, “Sahib, valaikumsalam, I cannot meet you in person. Your son is alive and he is in Pakistan. I could only bring his slip, which I am sending you. Now going back to Pak.” Signed M. Abdul Hamid. In August, 1975, he received another missive postmark dated ‘June 14/15/16, 1975, Karachi.’ The letter said, “Dear Daddy, Ashok touches thy feet to get your benediction. I am quite ok here. Please try to contact the Indian Army or Government of India about us. We are 20 officers here. Don’t worry about me. Pay my regards to everybody at home, specially to mummy, grandfather – Indian government can contact Pakistan government for our freedom.” The then Defence Secretary had the handwriting confirmed as Ashok’s and changed the official statement from “killed in action” to “missing in action”!
·         Maj AK Ghosh’s photograph was published in Time Magazine dated 27-12-1971 The photograph is proof that Maj AK Ghosh was in Pakistani custody when the war ended on 17 December 1971. He did not return with the POWs in 1972 at the time of the Simla agreement. He may have died in the interim period in a Pakistani jail. Surely there must be some record of that. The Indian and Pakistan governments can work together to find out what happened to such men. Why were some names not included in the POW list is again a moot point.
·         Mohanlal Bhaskar repatriated on 09.12.1974 writes “Main Bharat ka jasoos tha” or “ I spied for India” Mohanlal Bhaskar, who was in a jail between 1968 and 1974 and repatriated on 09.12.1974 wrote a book in Hindi ( I was a spy for India) and gave a signed affidavit stating that he met a Col Asif Shafi of Second Punjab regt of Pakistan and a Maj Ayaaz Ahmed Sipra in Fort of Attock imprisoned for conspiring against Bhutto in the infamous “Attock conspiracy” . The Pakistani Major Ayaaz Ahmed Sipra spoke of his befriending a Gill of the Indian Air Force and a Captain Singh of the Indian Army as well as mentioning that there were around 40 Pows of the 1965 and 1971 wars in that jail who had no chances of release
·         In the Attock Conspiracy, several officers of Pakistan’s army and air force were arrested on March 30, 1973, on charges of conspiring to overthrow the government of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. The detainees included Major Farooq Adam, Major Nadir Pervez (who later became a federal minister in the Nawaz Sharif government), Brigadier Wajid Ali Shah, Colonel Hamdani, and Major Ayaz Sipra, and a total of 59 officers were declared conspirators. The case is well known as the Attock conspiracy. Fifteen army and four air-force officers were found guilty of conspiracy and were handed jail terms ranging from three months to life. In this conspiracy, 15 officers were sentenced to terms in prison – among them Maj Ayaaz Ahmed Sipra and Col Asif Shafi. Others such as Farooq Adam (a Gallian, i.e. from Lawrence school, Ghoraghali) were also sentenced in the Attock conspiracy. Ayaaz Ahmed and Shafi later apparently moved to the US where Shafi was again traced by Manish Jain (son in law of Sqn Ldr Jain, another Indian officer missing and believed to be in Pakistani jails since the 1971 war) and Shafi confirmed to Jain unofficially that he had met Wg Cdr Gill in Attock in 2000 in a telephonic conversation.
·         A Pakistani General, General Riaz, Governor NWFP who subsequently died in an accident informed Mr Ashwini Kumar, then IG of the Border Security Force as a personal favour to him at the Munich Olympics in 1972 that Major Waraich was being held in Dargai jail, NWFP.
·         In her biography of Benazir Bhutto, British historian Victoria Schoffield reported that a Pakistani lawyer had been told that Kot Lakhpat prison in Lahore was housing Indian prisoners of war from the 1971 war. They could be heard screaming from behind a wall, according to an eyewitness within the prison.
·         Pakistani media outlets have also alluded to the men’s existence. The shooting down of Wing Commander Heresen Gill’s Mig 21 on 3 December 1971 was followed that day by a radio broadcast in which military spokesperson claimed that an ‘ace Indian pilot’ had been captured.
·         An American general Chuck Yeager also claimed in his autobiography that during the 1971 war, he personally interviewed Indian pilots captured by Pakistan. The airmen were of particular inertest to Americans because at the height of the cold war the men had attended training in Russia and were flying Russian designed and manufactured aircraft.
·         The families also claimed that on the two occasions when they were allowed to visit the Pakistani jails, the jail guards privately attested to the men being alive – before being ushered away by the prison authorities.
Why?
The question is – Why were these men not released by Pakistan? Was it because Pakistan wanted to extract some sort of revenge for the loss in the 1971 war? Was it because these men had come to know of some secrets that Pakistan did not want the world to know? Did Pakistan want to use them as a bargaining chip of some sort for the future?
Maybe it is all of the above reasons. But the biggest reason is that India forgot them. These men are the forgotten 54 of India. The ruling elite and the bureaucracy of the nation did not find it fit or suitable to keep these men and their release on their agenda. It was because this was not an issue strong enough to dictate the political, professional or financial fate of any politician or bureaucrat. Nobody in the decision making echelons had time for them.
Who is responsible?
What sort a nation are we that forgets it’s soldiers after the war is over? Was it not the collective responsibility of the nation to pressurize the governments to take this issue more seriously? After all, these PoW are somebody’s sons, brothers, husbands and fathers. Every nation and society is morally obliged to ensure that those fighting for it’s independence are looked after well in their hour of need. There can be no need more urgent than being released from the inhuman captivity of an enemy like Pakistan.
After the war the ruling class and he elite got busy trying to ‘improve relations’, they very conveniently swept this issue under the carpet. Over the years the self appointed elite that has dictated the agenda of the nation has all but deleted this issue from the collective consciousness of the nation. We are too busy trying to prove that ‘art has no borders’ ‘sports has no borders’ and such nonsense that will never find any reciprocity from across the border. To uphold such thrash, issues like the prisoners of war had to be forgotten and they were forgotten.
The military top brass too should have followed up more aggressively on this issue with the government. They were and are in a position to exert pressure on the government for this. Agreed, there were other pressing issues but this issue too is equally pressing and urgent.
All in all, the entire nation is responsible for this and this is an unforgivable fault. Nothing can be done for these 54 now except making Pakistan acknowledge that such a thing has happened. But we can and must ensure that such a thing never happens again.
Please do this
Share this as much as you can till the entire nation knows about it. Share it till the 54 are no longer forgotten. It’s probably already too late.

CSIO develops indigenous avionics test rigs for IAF

CSIO develops indigenous avionics test rigs for IAF
High-tech: Scientists demonstrate the use of the test platform at the CSIO in Chandigarh on Saturday. Tribune photo

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, December 16

All fighter squadrons of the Indian Air Force as well as the Navy will have indigenous test rigs for the calibration and post-flight analytics of head-up display (HUD) units installed in the cockpit of combat aircraft. This will reduce the costs significantly and save the time involved in getting the same work done from foreign vendors.The technology for the test rig, christened Military Aviation Head-Up Display Test Platform (MAHTP), has been developed by the Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIO) here. It was transferred today to defence public sector undertaking Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) for its commercial production at its Panchkula unit.The system has been certified by the DRDO’s Regional Centre for Military Airworthiness, Chandigarh, and will also be installed at repair and overhaul depots as well as aircraft manufacturing centres. The comprehensive aviation test platform provides visual inspection, system health monitoring, automated testing, fault debugging and repair and maintenance besides calibration and semi-automated evaluation of optical parameters like parallax error, binocular disparity, photometric characteristics, field of view and camera focus.According to CSIO scientists, each operational fighter squadron would require one set of MAHTP and Bore Sighting System (BSS), also developed by CSIO earlier. The estimated foreign exchange saving is about Rs 50 crore per aircraft. The production of these two systems will also provide revenue generating opportunities to smaller industries.


China’s Troops at Doklam This Winter Is Just Strategic Messaging BY LT GEN SYED ATA HASNAIN

The 72-day-long Doklam standoff between India and China may have ended but its effects will be felt for some time. When relationships at the border deteriorate, all kinds of issues become triggers, not necessarily for a show of arms but more for the purpose of strategic communication.

Also Read: Doklam Standoff Explained: Who’s Involved & Why’s India Bothered?

Is China Anticipating a Threat from India?

The recent crash of an Indian drone on a reconnaissance mission, somewhere along the India-Tibet border in the state of Sikkim, has upped the Chinese propaganda in the state-controlled media. The incident gave enough leeway for China to unleash its propaganda machinery and information warfare, all of which, in modern parlance, is referred to as communication strategy. The intent is to pick up such issues and browbeat India in order to curb initiatives from our side, thus granting China moral ascendancy.

Interestingly, alongside the incident of the crash of the Indian drone, there are media reports suggesting the presence of 1,800 soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) camping at Doklam for winter, something never done in the past. China has improved infrastructure by constructing two helipads and many store sheds and prefabricated huts for winter accommodation.

Roads in the area are also reported to have been improved. Is China anticipating an Indian threat or attempting to intimidate the Indian Army and the Indian political leadership?

Also Read: Lessons from Doklam: Not China, Not India, But Bhutan’s the Winner

Is This Merely ‘Advance Winter Stocking’?

India’s patience in dealing with Doklam received international praise. In military terms, India advanced the dates for the annual operational alert of the Siliguri-based 33 Corps.

The Advance Winter Stocking (AWS) as part of the annual logistics exercise continued except for a precautionary increase in vigil. Barring the additional troops being staged forward, nothing else seems to have been done. This appears to be the correct strategy.

The presence of less than a regiment (brigade in PLA’s parlance) of the PLA in an encampment mode, no doubt, with improved infrastructure should not necessarily intimidate the Indian Army. Of course, the issue need not be trivialised to presume that all is well, because Doklam remains a serious issue between the two neighbours who are perceived to be competitors for power in their own right.

What India should be aware of and competent to deal with is the level of intimidation by China, both politically as well as militarily. In this politico-military domain, it needs to be understood that the Chumbi Valley is not necessarily the most suitable area for China to optimise its operational capability for a major showdown.

Encampments and increased troop presence do not necessarily mean a higher optimisation of war-based capability. There is a big difference between the tactically deployed troops and the encamped ones.

Also Read: China Hints at Keeping Sizeable Troop Presence Near Doklam 

Muscle-Flexing at Doklam

The PLA’s continued presence in winter at Doklam, against normal practice, is more a political ego issue. China probably perceives that the BRICS summit at Xiamen (China) 0n 7 Sep 2017 and the 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in Oct 2017 prevented China from being able to play out the Doklam standoff as per its strategy.

While India too played down the termination of the standoff and did not make any intimidating statements, the final status probably did not satisfy the Chinese. A full withdrawal of Chinese resources from Doklam would have communicated an abdication of its intent and in its perception, given India an unacceptable psychological strategic advantage.

It would probably also communicate that India was morally correct, something extremely difficult for China to accept, especially with the run of events in Asia in general.

Nations engaged in a dispute with China will take a cue from Doklam and flex their muscles, a situation that is unacceptable to Beijing. In light of this, reinforced military presence in the Doklam area would convey that China had not abandoned its quest to build the road in an area it claims its own and that the world has not seen the last of Doklam.

Also Read: Army Moves Troops of Sukna-Based 33 Corps to India-China Border

Strategic Engagement with China

For India, there is a need for both political and military circumspection as well as close synchronisation to read the indicators. China’s characteristic vitriol has been slightly toned down but this is likely to increase as the summer of 2018 approaches. Our military activity needs to be calibrated to the extent of being balanced with no unnecessary intimidation; we need not be overly defensive either. However, political engagement with China needs to be enhanced with specific reference to the Doklam standoff.

The circumstances post the disengagement at Doklam did not give sufficient opportunity for focused engagement as both sides parried the issue. Diplomatic niceties alongside a few barbs have continued but if Doklam is not to become a thorn once again, a more considered strategic engagement with China – political, diplomatic and military – might be needed.

To an extent, it is already happening, as is evident from the type of strategic seminars being organised in Delhi marked by the presence of Chinese academics. India’s messaging needs to be clear; there are enough border protocols for resolution of the border issue and India will abide by these – but military intimidation aiming to cause strategic disadvantage, as was attempted in Doklam, is not something India will accept.

Also Read: Do 1,800 Chinese Troops in Doklam Indicate a Permanent Presence?

(The writer, a former GOC of the army’s 15 Corps, is now associated with Vivekanand International Foundation and Institute of Peace & Conflict Studies. He can be reached at@atahasnain53. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)


Muktsar woman shows mettle, makes it to Australian air force

Muktsar woman shows mettle, makes it to Australian air force
Manjit Kaur has been recruited into the RAAF.

Archit Watts

Tribune News Service

Muktsar, December 9

Manjit Kaur (36) from Muktsar has been recruited as an aircraftwoman in the medical wing of Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). Before her recruitment, she underwent a three-month physical training there.She hails from a family of a marginal farmer of Bhala Saryamalwala village in Ferozepur. Manjit married Roop Singh Sandhu of Muktsar in 2002. He is employed with the Australian government and drives a truck.Manjit, along with her husband, went to Australia on a study visa in 2009. At that time, she had two daughters. She got the PR in 2013.“Our maternal uncle, who retired as a Colonel from the Indian Army, was Manjit’s inspiration to serve the armed forces,” said Manjit’s brother Gursahib Singh, an employee in the judicial courts of Gidderbaha.“She cleared the physical test twice to get selected in the RAAF. She got success on December 6,” he said.About Manjit’s job, Gursahib said she would be attending to Air Force personnel suffering from medical conditions.“Manjit has worked at a community welfare and disability centre in Brisbane. She has done some study in this field as well. These things helped her get the job,” he added.