Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

Punjab: ‘What Kind of Government Defines a Martyr on the Basis of a Time Frame?’

Kusum Arora

writer :Kusum Arora

At least 12 families of war heroes have been denied benefits from the state’s Honour and Gratitude Policy for various bureaucratic reasons.

Punjab: ‘What Kind of Government Defines a Martyr on the Basis of a Time Frame?’

Jalandhar: Palwinder Kaur was five months pregnant when her husband Rajinder Singh, a sepoy in 22 Punjab Regiment, was killed while deployed in the Poonch sector of Jammu and Kashmir on November 1, 1998. He was awarded the Shaurya Chakra posthumously.

Four months later, by the time her son had been born, Palwinder’s life had changed. She was a single mother and she was waiting for financial assistance from the Punjab government.

It is now 2020 and Palwinder is still waiting for some sort of assistance from the state government. Her 21-year-old son, Ravinder Singh, has been shuttling between government offices in search of a job. He is not entitled to one because the Punjab government’s Honour and Gratitude Policy bars soldiers martyred on or before 1999 from any government support or job.

“My husband sacrificed his life while eliminating four militants during Operation Rakshak and was awarded the Shaurya Chakra. He is a shaheed (martyr) because he died fighting for the country,” Palwinder tells The Wire from Kalanaur in Gurdaspur district. “Now, when I see my son, Ravinder, running from pillar to post for a government job, I am miserable. Only my husband’s regiment has remained in touch with us since then. We have been conveniently forgotten by all the governments in the state.”

‘Please return my father’

Punjab’s Honour and Gratitude Policy was enacted on August 19, 1999, to benefit the families of those members of the defence forces who have been killed while serving India. Before this, the Punjab government provided a monetary allowance to the families of gallantry award winners such as Param Vir Chakra, Maha Vir Chakra, Vir Chakra, Ashok Chakra, Kirti Chakra and Shaurya Chakra. However, the families of soldiers who were awarded the Shaurya Chakra, the Kirti Chakra and the Vir Chakra were left out of the list of beneficiaries in the Honour and Gratitude Policy.

The policy was amended on June 27, 2000, allowing job benefits for the dependents of those soldiers who had been awarded the Param Vir Chakra, Maha Vir Chakra or Vir Chakra posthumously before January 1, 1999. There have been further amendments to the policy since then, but because the policy specifies a certain time frame, Palwinder’s family is still not entitled to any benefits.

On June 18, 2020, Punjab chief minister Captain Amarinder Singh increased the ex-gratia amount for soldiers killed in action from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 50 lakh. He also said government jobs would be available for the next of kin, but made no mention of a time frame for battle casualties.

Meanwhile, Ravinder Singh is in college, but needs work. “I can’t recall how many times I have fruitlessly visited the office of Defence Services Welfare, Punjab, in Chandigarh,” he says. “It hurts to see such apathy when chief minister Captain Amarinder Singh himself is an army officer. The personnel department recommended an amendment to the policy last year but our case is still pending.”

Also read: On Permanent Commission for Women Officers, the Army Continues to Drag Its Feet

Ravinder’s great grandfather, Ujagar Singh, served in the First British Army. His grandfather, Pooran Singh, a junior commissioned officer, served in 3 Punjab Regiment. His father died for India.

Now the only thing Ravinder can do is administer his Twitter handle, ‘War Widows of Punjab’. He wants justice from the Punjab government for the families of 12 soldiers who died like his father.

Sepoy Raunki Singh from 11 Sikh Light Infantry was killed on August 12, 1997, and received the Shaurya Chakra posthumously. His wife and four daughters received no help from the state government.

“Soon after my husband’s demise, my in-laws threw me out of their home in Jagraon, Ludhiana. My daughters and I settled in Batala, where my parents lived,” says Daljit Kaur, widow of Raunki Singh.“All these years, we remained solely dependent on my husband’s pension, though my husband’s regiment helped me during my daughter’s wedding. But despite having received a gallantry award for my husband’s valour, I remain a war widow on paper only.”

Daljit Kaur’s daughter, Gurmeet Kaur, became a nursing assistant so she could contribute to the family’s budget. “We have been waiting for government assistance for the past 23 years and sent a letter to that effect to the Punjab chief minister this February,” says Gurmeet. “These days, the Punjab government does not even wait for the announcement of gallantry awards; it assists the families of martyrs within a couple of days. But my father’s bravery has been ignored. Je sarkar kuch nahi kar sakdi, ta saade shaheed sanu wapis kar do. Mere papa mainu wapis kar do (If the government cannot do anything for us, please return our martyrs. Please return my father).”

‘This policy is wrong’

Over the years, state governments have announced that they will amend the Honour and Gratitude Policy. This includes the SAD-BJP government that had come to power in an earlier state election. So far, however, no changes have actually been made.

Jalandhar resident Gulshan Sandhu, the son of Lieutenant Joga Singh, has also been following up with the Punjab government on this issue. Gulshan’s father was killed while fighting militants in the Uri sector of J&K on October 21, 1998 and was conferred the Shaurya Chakra posthumously.

Sepoy Satpal Singh from 9 Mahar Regiment was killed on November 11, 1994, while fighting militants in Doda district of J&K. His son, Bhupinderjit Singh (31), has completed his elementary teacher training, but was not provided with a government job. Today, Bhupinderjit runs a turban tying shop in Gurdaspur to make his living.

“My father is also a recipient of the Shaurya Chakra but what is the benefit?” he asks.“My case for a government job is still pending with the department of school education and also the personnel department. I was told a decision could be taken only after a cabinet meeting. Some years ago, we applied for a gas agency for war widows, but even that was denied.”

Also read: J&K Militancy Suffers Significant Losses as Security Forces Amp Operations Amidst Lockdown

The families of Jalandhar-based Shaurya Chakra awardee Major H.P.S. Sandhu, who was killed in action during a counter-insurgency operation in 1993 and Vir Chakra awardee Lance Naik Prem Singh from 2 Dogra Regiment, who was killed in Siachen Glacier in 1989 are also hoping that the state government will amend the Honour and Gratitude Policy.

The family of Naib/Subedar Baldev Raj from the 17 JAK Rifles who received the Kirti Chakra posthumously is also a victim of this policy. A resident of Pathankot, Baldev Raj was martyred in Baramulla in J&K in 1992.

His son, Manmohan Singh, who works at a pesticide unit in Kathua, Jammu, said he was just 3.5 years old when his father was martyred.

“We survived on our father’s meagre pension and my mother started sewing to raise me and my two brothers,” he says.“After my graduation, I spent six years approaching the state government for a job, but my request was turned down because of this wrong policy. It is sad that the Punjab government defines its ‘martyrs’ on the basis of a time frame.”

Waiting for an amendment

According to Gurkirat Kirpal Singh, secretary of Defence Services Welfare, Punjab, the organisation has sent a demand to the Personnel Department to amend the policy. Now they are waiting to see what happens.

Brigadier Satinder Singh (retd), director of the Defence Services Welfare, Punjab, says he wrote to the Punjab government for an amendment to the policy two months ago. “I strongly recommended that they add the families of Ashok Chakra, Shaurya Chakra and Kirti Chakra awardees to the policy,” he tells The Wire. “There was an amendment to the policy in 2017, but these families were still left out. I am hopeful that the government will address this issue soon.”


Covid Reporting Procedure For ECHS Beneficiaries .

The procedure for patients with covid 19 symptoms is as follows
1. Report to PC ( Polyclinic) with photocopies of both sides of ECHS Card and Adhar Card.
2. MO examines.
3. MO decides whether it is a Covid suspect case or not.
4. If the patient is a covid 19 suspect, an ICMR form is filled by PC and signed by MO. Also, a regular referral form is prepared and signed by OIC PC and MO.
5. Patient is directed to Report to Central Lab with
a. Copies of Adhar Card both sides, ECHS Card both sides, ICMR form and Referral Form duly signed.
6. Patient should contact Central Lab on telephone, PC will assist.
7. Central Lab fixes a time for taking sample which will be taken at patient’s residence. Patient should handover the documents to lab representative.
8. Results of the test is intimated in 24 hrs.
YOU MAY SHARE THIS WITHIN ESM COMMUNITY PLEASE.


23 YO Gurtej Singh: An Inspiration For Today’s Youth

The India-China stand-off has brought one important thing to the forefront – how the Indian Armed Forces fight on the borders to ensure we stay safe within the country.

Gurtej Singh

The Galwan valley clash martyred 20 of our soldiers, but they ensured that there is no land grabbing by the Chinese troops. Amongst them was 3 Punjab’s Ghatak Platoon’s, Gurtej Singh. He fought against all the odds and despite losing his own life for it, took down 12 Chinese soldiers. This is his story.
Twenty-three-year-old Gurtej Singh hailed from Beerewala village in Punjab’s Mansa district. He joined the Army in December 2018. He had always been keen to serve the army, and the dream came true when he joined the Sikh regiment.
On the evening of 15 June 2020, the 16th Bihar regiment was posted in the valley and came under immense fire. The 3 Punjab’s Ghatak Platoon was called upon to reinforce the outmanoeuvred fighters. The Medium Arty regiment’s Sikh gunners rushed out to help to carry their customary kirpan and an assortment of sticks, rods and sharp knives only.

Sources from the military state that four Chinese soldiers attacked Singh. He swung around two of them, and as two others tried to pin him down, he dragged all four of them towards the cliff and flung them over. He lost his balance though and slipped. But he got stuck in a boulder that stopped his free fall.

Though he was injured severely in the neck and head, he rewrapped his turban and pulled himself back to the fight. He used his kirpan to fight more soldiers until he could snatch a sharp weapon from a Chinese soldier. He further took down seven Chinese soldiers making the tally to 11 before one stabbed him from behind. But before going down, he killed his final 12th enemy with his kirpan too.
His mortal remains reached home on 19 June 2020 where the final rites were conducted amidst full military honours. Leaders of military and government paid their homage to this braveheart. Slogans of ‘Gurtej Singh Amar Rahe’ and ‘Bole So Nihal Sat Sri Akal’ were heard from the many villagers from in and around his native village.

His father said, “There’s the grief of losing a son, but I also feel proud of the fact that he laid down his life for the country.” He is survived by his father Virsa Singh, mother Parkash Kaur and two elder brothers. He was supposed to attend his brother’s wedding a week prior but decided to stay back at his post as the situation in Galwan valley was tense.

Gurtej Singh might not be there anymore amongst us, but it is inspiring and a lesson for today’s youth. We salute the braveheart for his sacrifice.


The old shepherd you see in the photo was actually the biggest military asset once

.Read the entire post and we cannot but bow down our heads at his feet.*

In 2008, Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw was admitted to Wellington Hospital, Tamil Nadu. He often kept taking a name *Pagi-Pagi*- in his ill-health and semi concious state.The doctors asked one day “Sir, who is this Paagi?”

This is based on what Sam sahib himself narrated….

In 1971 India had won the war. General Manekshaw was in Dhaka and ordered that Pagi be invited for dinner that day. A Chopper was sent. While boarding the chopper, a bag belonging to Pagi remained left on the ground and the chopper was turned back to pick it up.The officers opened the bag before placing it in the helicopter as per the rules and were stunned because it had two rotis, onions and a dish of gram flour (gathiya).One half of the meal was eaten by Sam Sahab and the other by Pagi for dinner.

A border post of *Suigaon* at the International Border region of North Gujarat was named *Ranchoddas post*. This was the first time that an army post was named after a common man as well as a statue of his installed.

Pagi means ‘guide’ , the person who shows the way in the desert.Ranchoddas Rabari,the man in the picture,was affectionately called *Pagi* by General Sam Manekshaw.

Ranchoddas of *Pathapur Gathras*, a village bordering Pakistan in *Banaskantha* district of Gujarat was where he used to rear Sheep, goat and camel. Life changed when, at the age of 58,he was appointed the police guide by the Banaskantha Superintendent of Police, Vanraj Singh Jhala.

The guide’s skill was such that after seeing the footprints of the camel, he used to tell how many men are riding on it. By looking at the footprints of humans,he used to guess their weight, their age and how far they must have gone.His estimations had the exactness of a computer analysis.

In the beginning of 1965 war, Pakistan Army captured *Vidhkot* in *Kutch* border in Gujarat.In this encounter, about 100 Indian soldiers were killed.A 10,000 men Indian Army contingent was mobilised and had to reach *Chharkot* in three days.The need for Ranchoddas Pagi was felt for the first time by the army.Due to his grip on the desert paths, he guided the army to the destination 12 hours before the scheduled time. He was personally chosen by Sam Saheb to guide the army and a special post was created in the army ‘Pagi’ ie the person with knowledge of feet.

The location and approximate number of 1200 Pakistani soldiers hiding at the Indian border was revealed based only by their footprints, and that was enough for the Indian Army to win that front.

Along with the guidance of the army in the 1971 war, getting ammunition to the front was also part of Pagi’s work. Pagi’s role was important in the victory of the Indian tricolor on the *Palinagar* city of Pakistan. Sam Sahib himself gave a cash prize of ₹ 300 from his own pocket.

Pagi also received three honors for his contribution in the 65 and 71 wars – * *Sangram Medal*, *Police Medal* and *Summer Service Medal*!

Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw died on 27 June 2008 and in 2009 Pagi also took ‘voluntary retirement’ from the army. Pagi was 108 years old then! Yes, you read it right … ‘voluntary retirement’ at the age of 108! Pagi died in 2013 at the age of 112.

Even today his exploits are a part of Gujarati folk songs. His gallant saga will be sung for ages. Ranchoddas Rabari i.e. our ‘Pagi’ has become immortalized forever in Indian military history due to his patriotism, valor, bravery, sacrifice, dedication and decency.


Army chief Narvane visits forward areas along IB in Pathankot-Jammu region

During the visit, the Army chief reviewed the security situation and emphasised on ‘zero tolerance’ against ceasefire violations by Pakistan and infiltration attempts.

Army Chief General MM Naravane (2nd R) during his visit along along the border in Jammu, Samba and Pathankot region

Army Chief General MM Naravane (2nd R) during his visit along along the border in Jammu, Samba and Pathankot region | PTI Photo
Jammu: Army Chief Gen M M Naravane on Monday visited forward areas along the International Border (IB) and reviewed the security situation and operational readiness of the troops deployed on ground in the Jammu-Pathankot region, a defence spokesperson said.

He visited areas falling under the operational command of the Rising Star Corps, including Kathua, Samba, Jammu and Pathankot, to review the security situation.

The Chief of Army Staff was received here by Lt Gen R P Singh, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, Lt Gen Upendra Dwivedi, GOC Rising Star Corps, Maj Gen V B Nair, GOC Tiger Division and Air Commodore A S Pathania, Air Officer Commanding (AOC), Air Force station Jammu, the spokesperson said.

Gen Naravane was briefed by Lt Gen Dwivedi on the operational preparedness, upgradation of security infrastructure and the internal security matters.

The Army chief, accompanied by GOC Tiger Division, reviewed operational preparedness in the forward areas, the spokesperson said.

He interacted with the field formation commanders and troops on ground during the visit.

Gen Naravane also visited the forward areas of Gurj Division and was briefed by Maj Gen Y P Khanduri, GOC Gurj Division, he added.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

He reinstated the fact of ‘zero tolerance’ against ceasefire violations by Pakistan and infiltration attempts by terrorists.

He further highlighted that all agencies of the services and government are working together relentlessly and will continue to do the same to defeat the nefarious design of proxy war being fuelled by our adversaries.

The Army chief addressed all ranks of the Western Command through video conferencing and lauded the morale of the troops.

He expressed confidence in the Indian Army’s capabilities to thwart any misadventure by the enemies of the country and handle any situation.

He also commended the efforts of all the formations of the Western Command in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic by supporting the ongoing ‘Op Namaste’.


Also readIndia’s credibility will be hit if our posture on China doesn’t match new realities at LAC


India planning to order Heron drones, Spike anti-tank guided missiles from Israel

A Heron 1 UAV in flight

A Heron 1 UAV in flight | Representational image | Commons
New Delhi: Engaged in a boundary dispute with China in eastern Ladakh, India is planning to enhance its surveillance capabilities and firepower by placing orders for Heron surveillance drones and Spike anti-tank guided missiles from Israel under the emergency financial powers granted by the government. The Heron unmanned aerial vehicles are already in the Air Force, Navy, and the Army and are being used extensively at the moment by both Army surveillance and Target acquisition batteries and Air Force in the Ladakh sector.

“There is a need for acquisition of Heron UAVs to add to the existing fleet of these drones for meeting the requirements of our Air Force fleet. We are planning to place orders for these UAVs,” government sources told ANI here without specifying the numbers to be procured.

The Heron has been in service with the three defence wings for several years now and can fly continuously for more than two days at a stretch providing reconnaissance from an altitude of more than 10 kilometres.

The forces are also working towards inducting an armed version of the UAV, as well as upgrading the existing fleet into combat UAVs under the ambitious ‘Project Cheetah’ spearheaded by the Indian Air Force.

On the other hand, the Army is planning to place orders for more Spike anti-tank guided missiles which were received by it last year from Israel under the emergency financial powers granted to the services in the Post-Balakot air strikes scenario.

Last time, the Army had gone in for 12 launchers and 200 Spike missiles.

“We are planning to acquire more of these anti-tank missiles for tackling any threat from the enemy armoured regiments,” the sources said.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

In the meanwhile, DRDO is working towards developing the indigenous Man-Portable Anti Tank Guided Missile (MP-ATGM) which will meet the bulk requirement of over 50,000 of these missiles needed by the Infantry units.

The defence forces have also initiated requirements for acquiring Spice-2000 bombs, assault rifles, ammunition and missiles, and some platforms for meeting the requirements in case the situation escalates further on the Line of Actual Control.

China has done massive build up along the LAC with the deployment of 20,000 troops and its heavy weaponry and fighter aircraft since May 5 and India has also responded in equal measure to the Chinese force mobilisation.


Also readHAL ties up with Israeli firm & Dynamatic Technologies to manufacture drones


Domestic arms makers say Army plan to reorder SIG rifles from US setback to ‘Make in India’

Army’s fresh order for SIG assault rifles would mean over 1.4 lakh rifles will be bought off the shelf from US despite a domestic industry that manufactures a range of assault rifles.

Image: An indigenous rifle by SSS Defence | Ramandeep Kaur | ThePrint

An indigenous rifle by SSS Defence | Ramandeep Kaur | ThePrint
New Delhi: The Army’s decision to go ahead with a second order of 72,000 SIG 716 assault rifles from the United States is yet another “setback” to the private small arms industry in India, and sharpens focus on the government’s inability to kickstart the AK 203 production factory in Amethi.

When the order for the SIG assault rifles is placed ⁠— under the option clause of the original contract signed for 72,400 rifles ⁠— it would mean that over 1.4 lakh 7.62×51 mm rifles in total will be bought off the shelf from abroad without a ‘Make in India’ initiative.

The domestic industry said the Army’s decision isn’t surprising, but is indeed a setback to them and doesn’t align with the government’s aatma nirbharta (self reliance) push. For now, domestic manufacturers are placing their bets on the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), special forces and the state police, besides the export market for their range of assault rifles.

Defence sources said the SIG assault rifles procurement had to do with a weapon already in service with troops. The fact that an option clause was part of the deal means the plan was always to buy more rifles, depending on the feedback and necessity.

On the ‘Make in India’ initiative, a source said it was being promoted through the AK 203 manufacturing factory, which is expected to be the mainstay of the armed forces. The source added that there are several other tenders in the works in which private domestic players are participating.

The Indian Army had been trying to replace their standard INSAS assault rifles for many years but has been unable to so due to varying factors.

The second batch of SIG rifles will arrive after the delivery of the first order this year, which was placed through the Fast Track Process (FTP). The option clause allows the Army to reorder the rifles for the same price within a similar delivery time-frame.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

The new rifles will go to troops in the Northern Command and other operational areas, while the rest of the troops will be equipped with AK 203.

However, the SIG order draws attention to the fact that the government has not been able to start production of AK 203 rifles, chambered to fire 7.62×39 mm ammunition (same as the AK-47), at the Amethi factory that was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi last March.

The Indo-Russia Rifles Private Limited, established between the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB), Kalashnikov Concern and Rosoboronexport, the Russian state agency for military exports, has seen a delay in starting production.

Earlier this year, the defence ministry had formed a committee to work out the cost of the AK 203 since the Russian partner and OFB are yet to arrive at an agreed price.


Also read: Indian Army deploys US-, Italy-trained snipers with deadly new rifles along LoC


Domestic industry unhappy

A source in the defence industry said that when the Army suddenly decided to acquire AK 203 under a government-to-government initiative in 2018, it was the first blow. The SIG rifles deal was also a “setback” for private manufacturers.

“The Army’s decision to order for another tranche of rifles from the US is not surprising but is indeed a setback. A number of companies in India have come up with their own rifles and other systems or tied up with foreign companies and set up manufacturing facilities,” the source said.

A second source said, “The arms manufactured by India have to go through multiple tests. From summer trials to winters to high altitude and desert. However, under the FTP model, the foreign manufacturer shows off the ability in their own factory and is selected under emergency clause.”

A third source said, “The talk now is of ‘Make in India’ and ‘Atmanirbartha’. But when domestic industry is offering world-class rifles, the focus is still on procuring from abroad. Do note that the 1.4 lakh rifles from US will be straight import without any Make in India or technology transfer.”


Also read: Two new Israeli assault rifles Arad and Carmel now set to be manufactured in India


Domestic manufacturers up their game

One of the early companies to set up an arms manufacturing plant in India was PLR Systems in a tie-up with Israeli Weapons System (IWI).

Under the deal, the companies began producing weapons like Tavor series, the mainstay of the special forces in India, along with others like the Galil sniper rifle, Uzi Pro submachine gun, Masada pistol and the Negev Light Machine Gun (LMG) with indigenous content ranging from 40-60 per cent.

In case of a repeat order, though, it is sent to IWI directly instead of the local manufacturing unit since there will be a change in the name of the firm.

“This means that there will have to be fresh trials even when it is the same rifle manufactured in India with a large indigenous component,” a third source said.

Bengaluru-based SSS Defence is another company in the domestic market. The company manufactures a sniper, assault rifle and light machine gun.

The rifles are completely indigenously designed, with SSS Defence holding the Intellectual Property Rights for its design.

Bharat Forge of the Kalyani Group also works in the small arms market and has tie-ups with a foreign player for indigenous manufacturing for an Army contract bid.


Also read: AK 203 and Kamov delayed, India and Russia aim for missile deal ahead of Modi visit


Army’s quest for assault rifles

In 2011, the Army issued a global tender for procurement of assault rifles wherein Colt of United States, Beretta of Italy, IWI of Israel and Ceska of Czeck Republic participated.

However, this attempt failed since only the IWI weapon qualified the trials and was declared the resultant single vendor.

The Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE), DRDO and OFB also tried to design and develop assault rifles to replace the INSAS. However, none of their weapons made the cut.

Yet another Request for Proposal (RFP) for procurement of assault rifles was issued in 2017 with assurance of a floating RFP in 2018.

Given the situation, it was felt that a certain quantity of rifles needed to be procured on an urgent basis for the frontline troops.

Accordingly, the Indian Army planned to procure 72,400 assault rifles of Calibre 7.62x51mm through the Fast Track Process route.

Later, the Army backed the idea of manufacturing AK rifles jointly with Russia, a project that the Russians had been pushing for a while.


Also read: Militant snipers add grisly new chapter to Kashmir insurgency with three kills


India-China corps commanders talks today to focus on Pangong, to be toughest round yet

India-China corps commanders talks today to focus on Pangong, to be toughest round yet

A file photo of Pangong Lake in Ladakh | Visharad Saxena | Special arrangement

A file photo of Pangong Lake in Ladakh | Visharad Saxena | Special arrangement

New Delhi: The fourth round of corps commander-level talks between India and China, scheduled for Tuesday at the Chushul-Moldo meeting point, may prove the toughest yet as they will focus on disengagement at Pangong Lake and the Depsang Plains, where both sides have serious differences.

The meeting will be led by 14 Corps Commander Lieutenant General Harinder Singh and his Chinese counterpart Major General Lin Liu, commander of the South Xinjiang Military District, who also conducted the earlier rounds of military talks on 6 June, 22 June, and 30 June.

Like the third round of military dialogue, the meeting Tuesday will also be held on the Indian side, which, sources said, means India will have the first say. The first two meetings were held on the Chinese side of Chushul-Moldo.

The talks Tuesday are likely to last long, the sources added even as they remained tightlipped about the exact agenda points of the meeting.

India and China have been engaged in a series of military and diplomatic dialogues to ease the stand-off along several points of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Ladakh — the Galwan Valley, Hot Spring, Depsang Plains and Pangong.

The standoff began in May, and saw the countries engage in their deadliest clash in decades — the Galwan Valley face-off that led to the death of 20 Indian soldiers and an unconfirmed number on the Chinese side. It was triggered by Chinese refusal to adhere to mutually agreed disengagement terms.

In light of subsequent talks, the countries began a second attempt at disengagement in Ladakh last Monday.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

One of the sources said the meeting Tuesday will involve discussions on “disengagement in other areas, besides Galwan Valley and the Hot Spring area, which includes the Gogra post”.

“They will also review the disengagement that has taken place in these locations (Patrol Point or PP 14 in Galwan, and PP 15 and PP 17 in Hot Spring),” the source said.

A second source said the main point of discussion is the Pangong Lake, where the Chinese have come in by 8 km since May, besides the Depsang Plains, where the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) have a huge build-up of artillery, tanks and soldiers.

While disengagement in Galwan and Hot Spring involved the two sides moving back from the face-off sites, the situation in Pangong Lake and Depsang Plains is different, sources said.

“This round of talks would be tough. In Galwan and Hot Spring, there was more understanding at the local level on the LAC. However, it varied a lot in Pangong and Depsang Plains,” the source added.

“The Chinese have intruded deep into the Indian side of the LAC. The Chinese will have to move back,” a third source said.

The sources said there is no possibility of Indians moving back from these areas since they are well within their own territory — territory, they “controlled and not just patrolled”.


Also Read: Why the serene Pangong lake lies at the heart of India-China border dispute in Ladakh


Disengagement in progress

The disengagement that began last week has seen China’s presence “thin down” at Finger 4 in the Pangong Lake, although the PLA continues to dominate the position.

At Depsang Plains, meanwhile, India and China have both increased deployment. According to Army sources, the PLA has deployed additional tanks and moved them slightly forward from their usual positions, but they are still away from the LAC.

However, inputs suggest Indians are unable to reach Patrol Points 11, 12 and 13 at Depsang Plains, an area located close to the strategic air base Daulat Beg Oldi that has witnessed Chinese incursions in the past too.

Both India and China have pumped in over 30,000 troops, besides artillery, tanks, fighters, gunship helicopters and other equipment at Ladakh since the stand-off first began on 5 May following a clash at Pangong Lake.


Also Read: Fresh satellite images from Galwan and Depsang raise concerns of Chinese troop build-up


Trade interests behind China’s outreach to India

Trade interests behind China’s outreach to India

The partnership with China has inflicted irreparable financial loss on India since 1999. Where, then, is the gain for India in the lofty growth ‘partnership’? Indeed, the Dragon’s keen intention to have New Delhi as a ‘development partner’ has compelled the latter to incur a whopping Rs39,000-crore expenditure on the import of Russian Sukhoi-30 and MiG-29 combat aircraft at a time when the Chinese virus is ravaging Indian economy.

Abhijit Bhattacharyya

Commentator and Author

SUN Weidong, the Chinese Ambassador to India, has said that India and China should seek common development as partners rather than as opponents or adversaries. However, a segment of the Ambassador’s statement overshadows the so-called ‘partnership’: “The right and wrong of what recently happened in the Galwan valley is very clear. China will firmly safeguard sovereignty and territorial integrity, and ensure peace and tranquillity in the border areas.” Whose ‘sovereignty and territorial integrity’ is China referring to? Obviously, not India’s. China is categorically stating that it will ‘firmly safeguard’ the Galwan valley.

Hence, without an iota of remorse or regret, it’s the implied justification for killing 20 soldiers and injuring more than 175 men and officers. The unequivocal and irreversible threatening tone and tenor of the Communist Party of China (CPC) are both visible and audible. The epithet, ‘diplomat wolf warriors’ of China, at its transparent best again.

The objective of the CPC is loud and clear: ‘Sovereignty and territorial integrity’ is a one-way, non-negotiable street for China, not for India. The CPC’s unilateral perception, nay conviction, is unaltered and unalterable. Remote, hallucinatory claim of ‘ownership’ doesn’t turn it into a bona fide and legal physical ‘possession’ or ‘occupation’, the prerequisite for any property, especially immovable, like land, in international relations also.

The area which China claims to reclaim through threat, blackmail and force, from all historical and legal points of view, belongs to and is in actual possession of India, and not that of China as the Ambassador would like us to believe — colloquially referred to as ‘psychological (psy) war’.

Just have a relook at Maharaja Hari Singh’s ‘accession to India’ document of October 26, 1947. The language is clear, the picture vivid. Especially this paragraph: “Now, therefore, I, Shriman Indar Mahandar Rajrajeshwar Maharajadhiraj Shri Hari Singhji Jammu Kashmir Naresh atha Tibbet adi Deshadhipathi, Ruler of Jammu and Kashmir State, in the exercise of my sovereignty in and over my said State do hereby execute this my Instrument of Accession…”

As per the document, at least a part of Tibbet (Tibet) did fall in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Hence, once J&K acceded to India, the whole thereof became an indivisible and inalienable part of the territory of sovereign India in 1947 itself. Much before the CPC’s forced occupation in 1950!

Which portion of Tibet was that? North of Bhutan, north-west of Burma, land proximate to the Mount Everest, or the area adjacent to Ladakh? Obviously, the latter, where the CPC is repeatedly trying to lay its hands on, through its army.

That was the territorial part, now referred to as ‘divergence’, which the Chinese aren’t keen to resolve. Rather, sweep it under the carpet.

This insoluble territorial problem helps the other factor called ‘convergence’ in the form of trade which helped China reach where it is today. At the expense of all, including India, which plays a minuscule, subservient role with a humongous trade deficit, thereby handing over its market, industry, banking and core sectors to China on a platter. Hence, the Dragon’s keenness, bordering on desperation, to have India on board, once again, as ‘partner and not rival’. Business as usual, implies Beijing’s profitability, as usual. Because, the strategic aim and purpose of showing an ‘inferior’ India has been achieved — by inflicting serious injuries on 200-plus soldiers, included 20 fatalities.

The CPC had the last laugh in May-June. A small price to pay in the international arena because it is , after all, a victory for China without war. Now, therefore, it extends the olive branch to show how ‘well-intentioned’ the Dragon is towards India.

So, now comes trade back in the guise of ‘partnership’, a partnership which has already inflicted irreparable financial loss on New Delhi and brought incredible gains to the Dragon since 1999. It’s understandable. In 1999-2000, India had a trade deficit of $743.85 million with China. In 2001-02, India’s loss mounted to $1.084 billion. By 2005-06, it was minus $4.108 billion. The 2006-07 gap shot up to $9.153 billion.

By 2013-14, India’s deficit stood at $36.21 billion; in 2017-18, it touched an unprecedented $63.047 billion. For 2019-20, India’s exports to China were to the tune of $16.6 billion, while the imports were at $65.3 billion. Where, then, is the gain for India in the lofty growth ‘partnership’ with China?

Indeed, the Dragon’s keen intention to have New Delhi as a ‘development partner’ has today compelled the latter to incur a whopping Rs 39,000-crore (around $5.2 billion) expenditure on the import of Russian Sukhoi-30 and MiG-29 combat aircraft at a time when the Chinese virus is ravaging the Indian economy.

And, finally, the Chinese eagerness to have India as a partner factors in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor which (CPEC) has blatantly violated India’s territorial integrity and constitutional sovereignty for years.

Therefore, the Chinese envoy’s plea is fine from the CPC’s point of view. It’s undeniably picture-perfect for the dedicated, devoted band of aspiring Communist princelings out to prove themselves ‘more loyal than the king’, to help conquer, and attain the numero uno status in the world, with the right political noise on Twitter and other platforms of electronic media. But does this address India’s concerns? Or does it repeat the CPC’s view of world affairs through its own prism? A make-believe portrait of the Middle Kingdom with peripheral princes attending to the ‘Dragon Durbar’ of the Forbidden City, for favour preceded by the classical/traditional kowtow?

One hopes before re-accessing India’s market, and the continuous, uninterrupted pie in her industry, banking, trade, commerce, finance, telecommunication and transport, the CPC stops killing and injuring Indian soldiers, and ceases trampling upon India’s core national and sovereign interests. If it is ‘Wo men shi hao peng you’ (we are good friends), then the Dragon should also remember that ‘Wo bing buxiang shanghai ni de ganqing’ (I do not want to hurt you). That’s a two-way process, it simply cannot be compulsory for India and optional for China.

 


Army man ends his life

Army man ends his life

Ambala, July 14

An Army man allegedly committed suicide by hanging himself in the bathroom of his rented accommodation at BC Bazaar in Ambala Cantonment last night. The deceased has been identified as Deepak, who was a Naik. He was a native of Kerala. He was found hanging by his family members.

Ambala Cantonment SHO Vijay Kumar said, “Information about the suicide was received this morning. No suicide note has been recovered. He is survived by his wife and two daughters. Deepak was living with his family in Ambala for the past few months. His post-mortem will be conducted tomorrow and his family’s statement will be recorded.” — TNS