Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

*_The Indo-China war began on October 20, 1962. A new book states that it was China that decided to go to war._* by Bertil Lintner

Chinese preparations for the war obviously began long before October 1962 – and the November 1961 meeting where Nehru had outlined his Forward Policy. Even if there already were new roads and military camps in the area, tens of thousands of more People’s Liberation Army [PLA] troops and tons of supplies, including heavy military equipment, had to be moved over some of the most difficult terrain in the world. Mao sent altogether 80,000 Chinese soldiers to Ladakh and the eastern Himalayas to attack India. Supply lines had to be established and secured to the rear bases inside Tibet.
Once across the border, it was also apparent that the Chinese had detailed knowledge of the terrain, where the Indian troops were stationed, and how to best attack them. This was well before China had access to satellite imagery. Aerial surveillance from spotter planes would also have been impossible at that time. China depended entirely on human intelligence collected by its agents in the field, which would have taken time in the North-East Frontier Agency [NEFA]’s rough and roadless terrain. But China’s agents would also be confined largely to areas where the local population spoke languages and dialects related to Tibetan. It was nearly impossible for the Chinese to penetrate most parts of the NEFA where the local tribal population spoke other, non-Tibetan languages and dialects.
Consequently, the areas where the Chinese launched their attacks were carefully selected, and contrary to what many researchers, including those from India, have assumed, relatively limited. There is a common misperception that the PLA overran most of the NEFA and reached the lowlands at Bhalukpong, which now marks the state border between Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. Bhalukpong was abandoned and the PLA’s last encounter with Indian troops was at Chakhu, a small town near Bomdila, south of Rupa. In the east, they did not go much farther than Walong, and the incursions into Subansiri and Siang in the central sector were relatively minor.
*_All these areas have one thing in common. They are populated by Tibetan-speaking people or people speaking languages and dialects related to Tibetan._*
They were also areas where human intelligence operations had been possible before the war, and where the Chinese, through their Tibetan interpreters, were able to communicate with the locals who had stayed behind once the PLA crossed into the NEFA. Although the Indian Army had retreated from all its positions in the northeastern mountains, it is significant that the PLA did not venture into areas of the NEFA populated by Mishmis, Apatanis, Nyishis, and other non-Tibetan speaking tribes because no on-the-ground intelligence had been collected from there before the meticulously planned war. Those tribal groups would have been perceived as alien and therefore potentially hostile.
There were also other preparations that the Chinese had undertaken before the attacks in October 1962. Indian brigadier John Dalvi, who was captured alive with some of his men on October 22, 1962 and remained a prisoner of war in China until May 1963, recorded the events in his book Himalayan Blunder: The Angry Truth about India’s Most Crushing Military Disaster. Once captured and taken to the other side, Dalvi was able to observe how meticulously the Chinese had prepared their blitzkrieg against India.
He discovered that the Chinese had erected prisoner of war camps to hold up to 3,000 men and found out that interpreters for all major Indian languages had been moved to Lhasa between March and May 1962. Not only had tens of thousands of troops been redeployed to the area to be acclimatised to the high altitudes of the border mountains well before the attacks took place, but thousands of Tibetan porters had also been recruited and forward dumps had been established all along the frontier. Even more tellingly, Dalvi noticed that the Chinese had built a road strong enough to hold 7-tonne vehicles all the way up to Marmang near the McMahon Line.
*_All this, Dalvi wrote later, “was not an accident and was certainly not decided after 8th September 1962. It was coldly and calculatingly planned by the Chinese.”_*
While it is not inconceivable that the very final order to attack was given a week or so before the PLA swung into action (which would make sense from a tactical military point of view), it is also important to remember that the 1962 War also had nothing to do with the establishment of an Indian Army post in one of the remotest corners of the subcontinent. That could be seen as a pretext, but even then, at best, a rather flimsy one. Even Mao Zedong had told the Nepalese and the Soviet delegations before and after the war that the issue was never the McMahon Line or the border dispute. China thought that India had designs for Tibet, which, in the 1950s, was being integrated into Mao’s People’s Republic.
At a meeting on March 25, 1959, only three weeks after the outbreak of the Lhasa uprising and as the Dalai Lama was on his way over the mountains to India, Deng Xiaoping, then a political as well as a military leader, made China’s position clear: “When the time comes, we certainly will settle accounts with them [the Indians]” And, according to Bruce Riedel, one of American’s leading experts on US security as well as South Asian issues, “[p]robably as early as 1959, Mao decided that he would have to take firm action against Nehru”.
Zhao Weiwen, a South Asian analyst at China’s premier intelligence agency, the Ministry of State Security, wrote after the war in 1962 that “India ardently hoped to continue England’s legacy in Tibet” and that Nehru himself “harboured a sort of dark mentality”. Those factors, Zhao argued, led Nehru to demonstrate an “irresolute attitude” in 1959. And that “dark mentality”, US-China scholar John Garver quotes him as saying, led Nehru to give a free rein to “anti-China forces” in an attempt to foment unrest in Tibet to “throw off the jurisdiction of China’s central government”.
According to Garver, Mao was also present at the same meeting as Deng in March 1959, and the Chairman said that India “was doing bad things in Tibet” and therefore had to be dealt with. Mao, however, told the assembled members of the inner circle of the Chinese leadership that China should not condemn India openly for the time being. Instead, India would be given enough rope to hang itself, quo xingbuyi bi zibii, literally “to do evil deeds frequently brings ruin to the evil doer”.
*_China was waiting for the right moment to “deal” with India. But first, it needed precise and accurate intelligence from across the border._*
Findings by Nicholas Effimiades, an expert on China’s intelligence operations, reveals that the Chinese began sending agents into the NEFA and other areas two years before the military offensive. “The PLA gathered facts on India’s order of battle, terrain features, and military strategy through agents planted among road gangs, porters and muleteers working in border areas.” These agents, Effimiades states, “later guided PLA forces across the area during offensive operations…junior PLA commander – disguised as Tibetans – had reconnoitred their future area of operation.”
‘Two years before the military offensive” began in October 1962 means at least a year before the Forward Policy was conceived, which makes it hard to argue that India’s moves in the area provoked China to attack. Furthermore, the date, October 20, 1962, for the final assault after years of preparations was carefully chosen because it would coincide with the Cuban missile crisis, which the Chinese knew about beforehand through their contacts with the leaders of the Soviet Union. With Soviet missiles on Cuba, the Chinese were convinced that the USA would be too preoccupied to pay much attention to a war in the distant Himalayas.

Fire on wheels

Jasmine Singh

Faith, trust or bonding; if you ever start doubting these attributes, well, then you should check out the videos of Shwet Ashw team, the motorcycle daredevils that have set three Guinness Book Of World Records! At the Sukhna lake, on the opening day of the first Military Literature Festival, these daredevils surely proved how one can blindly trust teammates.Power packedThe lake area was cordoned off from both the sides and police made sure the audiences watched from a safe distance. Some of the visitors, all set for a sunset photo-shoot and selfies, were taken by surprise, but they did not mind. With the track Maa tujhey salaam and Yeh shehar hai veer jawaano ka playing in the background, people waited patiently.  And then, the action began! Dressed in red and white tracks, these brave men displayed exemplary stunts on the bike.Ride onMoving together in a parallel position, making a diamond position and then moving on to the figure of eight; balancing in a flower position, swimming or stretching out hands in a Christmas position and doing bhangra; it all happened on the bike! The temple position, reverse sunbath or flying fish… this team led by Naib Subedar Navneen Kumar Tiwari kept the adrenaline pumping. However, the last two stunts — the fire tunnel and breaking the tubelight —fetched a thunderous round of applause. Time stopped as the two daredevils crossed through the tunnel of fire; they raised their hand in victory sign, signalling that the task was accomplished! Sound of clicks drowned in the applause; one wonders how well can we catch the essence of such events in our cameras? Don’t eyes and memory do the job well? 

jasmine@tribunemail.com

 


WhatsApp shares location with friends

WhatsApp shares location with friends

Andrew Griffin

WhatsApp will now tell you friends where you are, so you don’t have to.

The chat app is introducing “Live Location”, a feature that lets people give out their location in real time to their friends. None of the information will be public, and it’s intended only to be used for a short amount of time.

So if you’re going to meet someone and are not sure where they are, you can show them on a map, for instance.

It’s used by heading to a WhatsApp chat, clicking on the “add” button, press on Location and switch it on. It can be used with just one person or in group chats, where everyone will get access to your location and everyone in the chat will be shown on one map.

The feature will be rolling out on both Android and iOS “in the coming weeks”, WhatsApp said. Some people claim to already have access to it.

A number of apps have recently run into trouble over location services. Snapchat, for instance, recently added a feature that allows people to see precisely where people are — and those people might not even know they’re being tracked.

But WhatsApp will only enable the feature with explicit consent, and will let people do so for a specific amount of time if they choose.

The app has allowed people to share their location for some time. But until now it was only static, so that you could send your current location but it wouldn’t then be updated.

The new feature is similar to one offered in iMessage, but only for people who are using Apple products. From a chat, you can click the little “i” button in the corner, and opt to share your location forever or just for a short while.

— The Independent

 


MILITARY LITERATURE FESTIVAL Memsahibs and their musings

There are paeans dedicated to Indian Armymen, but their wives remain the unsung heroes. A handful of books take in their perspective and examine their stories

Aradhika Sharma

While taking oath, a soldier swears that he will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and honestly and dutifully protect the country, even to the peril of his life, there is an unwritten oath that the woman who weds an armyman takes as well. They pledge to commit to a life of constant ‘postings’, long separations and fears and non-salubrious climes and living quarters. No wonder, most army wives are pragmatic and have developed a sense of acceptance and humour. These women have their own code of conduct — almost as strict as that of their husbands. There are protocols in place that must be adhered to at all times. So while the Army marches ahead with its rank and file; spit and polish; cavalry, artillery, infantry et al, the indomitable ladies do their part by committing to the lives they have chosen to live, representing the softer side of an establishment that is essentially warlike. While some of these ladies have penned down their personal experiences, others have given journalistic and historical accounts in the form of books and articles. All of these works examine different angles of domestic and social lives of soldiers and their spouses and provide a significant sociological commentary on one of the most important institutions of society down the ages. The British Victorian ladies, who came to India in the halcyon days of the Raj, chronicled the lives in those times in the forms of sketches and letters. Though not an army wife Emily Eden (sister of Governor General George Auckland) wrote Up the Country: Letters From the Upper Provinces of India in 1867 . This is a collection of letters that Emily wrote to her sister Fanny. Emily’s wry and caustic style has been compared to that of Jane Austen. Her travels provide insights into the life at the top as well as her brother’s catastrophic policy in Afghanistan.A comparatively modern work on the lives of the Indian Army wives is The Memsahibs: The Women of Victorian India by Pat Barr (1979). It is a wonderfully witty account of British women who came to India as soldiers’ wives, fiancés and sisters in the 19th century and set up a sub culture that the ‘brown memsahibs’ (up to an extent) follow till date. Pat Barr established a reputation for herself as a popular historian. Award-winning journalist Tanya Biank wrote Under the Sabers (2006) and Army Wives (2007). Both books explore the unwritten, complex codes of military marriages. Western literature is overflowing with novels, stories, handbooks, how-to books by army wives. Some of the titles by the western authors are: Homefront Club: The Hardheaded Woman’s Guide to Raising a Military Family. It examines the actualities and challenges of being married to a military man, “from keeping a marriage together and raising good kids to maintaining some semblance of normalcy.”Portraits of the Toughest Job in the Army: Voices and Faces of Modern Army Wives by Janelle H. Mock, who explains, “It’s hard to explain to people that your husband wants to go to war, but he does. He wants the experience. That is what he is trained to do.” Today’s Military Wife by Lydia Sloan Cline is a handbook on how a wife can prosper in a service milieu. She gives information on family-friendly programmes, coping with periodic separations, managing a separate career, living overseas, raising a family, while fully participating in the military social life. Faith Deployed: Daily Encouragement for Military Wives by Jocelyn Green is a ‘collection of devotions that addresses the challenges wives face when their husbands are away protecting freedom.’There’s even A Family’s Guide to the Military for Dummies by Sheryl Garrett and Sue Hoppin and Married to the Military: A Survival Guide for Military Wives, Girlfriends and Women in Uniform by Meredith Leyva (founder of CinHouse.com, a community for army spouses). Surprisingly, Indian Army wives haven’t been writing much. Although some brave better halves have ventured into the field of literature, this category of publication is sadly in the deficit. Fin Feather and Field by Simren Kaur (also the author of childrens’ books: Ladakh: Mountains of Adventure, Mystery of the Missing Relic) is the account of 40 years of her life in the armed forces with her husband. A Soldier’s Love Story by Sonia Kundra Singh (an army officer’s wife) is more about a traumatic love tale than an account of the army life. Soldier and Spice: An Army Wife’s Life by Aditi Mathur Kumar is another foray by an army wife into writing novels. It is the story of Pia who gets married to an army officer Arjun. After she gets married regular life is a thing of the past. She is now an army wife, a memsahib. Considering that the Indian Army is one of the largest in the world, surely there is space for recounting the complex personal challenges of keeping your love alive during deployments, adjusting to  constant moves, understanding how to maximise the salaries and benefits, juggling your own career and kids and the confusing protocols and roles demanded by the institution. 

Masquerade: The Life and Times of Deborah Sampson, Continental Soldier by Alfred F. Young. Vintage.

IMA’s pride

IMA’s pride
Commandant Lt Gen SK Jha with Mr IMA Tarun Vasudevan. Tribune photo

Dehradun: The IMA Ball, one of the eagerly-awaited social events, for the Autumn term was held at the Indian Military Academy. The evening of joy, merriment and nostalgia was commenced by Lt Gen SK Jha, Commandant, IMA. The highlight of the evening was the selection of Mr IMA and Miss IMA. Meenakshi Chaudhary was adjudged as Miss IMA and Gentleman Cadet Tarun Vasudevan was declared as Mr IMA. The IMA Ball is held towards the end of each term to mark the culmination of the rigorous training schedule. tns


India has upper hand over Pak by G Parthasarathy

India has upper hand over Pak
SHADOW BOXING: Maleeha Lodhi was ridiculed for holding up a fake picture. TWITTER

G Parthasarathy

MALEEHA LODHI, Pakistan’s ambassador to the UN, is known among her friends and admirers in Pakistan and elsewhere as being high profile, ambitious and loquacious. Lodhi is regarded as being close to the military establishment since her days as an editor in Islamabad. She was also close to Benazir Bhutto in the 1990s, but at loggerheads with Nawaz Sharif during his first two terms as Prime Minister.  Insiders believe that Nawaz agreed to her appointment as ambassador to the UN in his third term, after “persuasion” by the military. Having served twice as Pakistan’s envoy to Washington, as a close friend of the India-baiting Robin Raphael, Lodhi evidently thought that she would crown her tenure in New York by getting the issue of J&K back on the UN agenda, with the support of her many friends and admirers in Washington.Lodhi persuaded Pakistan’s interim Prime Minister, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, to launch a broadside against India in New York. Abbasi resorted to the usual rhetoric about alleged violations on human rights in J&K and references to antiquated UN resolutions, whose texts have long been thrown into UN waste paper baskets. Pakistanis, however, never speak of the Simla Agreement, while in New York! Not surprisingly, India’s External Affairs Minister, Sushma Swaraj, responded sarcastically, drawing attention to Pakistan’s record as a state sponsor of terrorism. She noted that while India is building institutions that are “the pride of the world”, Pakistan has only “produced terrorists and terrorist camps” of groups like the Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Hizb-ul-Mujahideen and Haqqani network. But, what appears to have got under Lodhi’s skin was the description of Pakistan as “Terroristan” by a young Indian First Secretary, Eenam Gambhir. An irate Maleeha became a subject of ridicule internationally and was blasted even in the Pakistani media when she displayed a photograph in the General Assembly of a young Palestinian girl wounded by Israeli pellets, bizarrely claiming that this photograph exposed Indian excesses in Kashmir.How then does one deal with a Pakistan which faces growing isolation, when ruled by a government deprived of its elected leader Nawaz Sharif, following a farcical trial, where the investigators included members of the military intelligence services, with the judiciary dancing to the tune of the military? It is evident that the military has no intention of permitting Nawaz to return to power. The Generals are determined to see that a supine judiciary disqualifies him from participating in the 2018 general elections. In the meantime, the Intelligence Bureau, which reported to Nawaz, is seeking to hold the ISI responsible for backing terrorist outfits. In the meantime, Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves are falling sharply and the IMF has thus far shown disinclination to bail it out. Pakistani economists are warning about the long-term problems posed by the China’s “One Belt, One Road” project, where Pakistan has to soon commence repaying Chinese loans of over $50 billion at near-commercial rates of interest. This, while Japan provides India long-term loans, requiring negligible interest payments.American academic Ashley Tellis, who undertook his graduate and post-graduate studies in Mumbai’s St Xavier’s College, is a highly regarded analyst on sub-continental strategic studies in Washington. In a recent study he published, Tellis clinically argues that routine calls for a “continuous India Pakistan dialogue” are “misguided” and “counterproductive”. Tellis notes that differences between India and Pakistan are fuelled by “Pakistan’s irredentism, its army’s desire to subvert India’s ascendancy as a great power, seeking revenge for past Indian military victories”. He adds that the Pakistan army has “aspirations to be treated on par with India, despite their huge differences in capabilities, achievements and prospects”. Senior officials, particularly in the Pentagon and White House, share these views of Tellis.Even influential and previously pro-Pakistani Senators like John McCain are stating that their patience is wearing thin with Pakistani duplicity. The fact that US Defence Secretary General Mattis visited India and Afghanistan and deliberately bypassed Pakistan, speaks for itself. But, given the propensity of President Trump to change his stance suddenly on foreign policy issues, India would be well advised not to be overly dependent on consistency in Trump Administration policies. Significantly, almost immediately after the Mattis visit to India and Afghanistan, Pakistan’s army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa led a military delegation to Kabul to meet Afghan President Ashraf Ghani. It is clear that General Bajwa and the ISI will decide how relations with Afghanistan and India will be conducted. The emasculated civilian leadership in Pakistan, under a cloud legally and preparing for elections, will merely be spectators, carrying out the wishes of the military.New Delhi now has to undertake a concerted diplomatic effort to take advantage of current developments.  No effort should be spared to make Pakistan pay a heavy price for its errant conduct. Dialogue, if any, with Pakistan, should be almost exclusively focused on terrorism. India has to simultaneously take measures to engage people and organisations across Pakistan who seek better ties with it, while meeting humanitarian needs of people, particularly children, in Pakistan requiring medical treatment in India, as External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj has consistently demonstrated. Indian diplomacy should have a humane dimension. There are sections of people in Pakistan who are tired of the country’s domination by the army.Diplomatically, India should make common cause with Afghanistan, insisting that Pakistan does not just put all its terrorist outfits temporarily in cold storage to win American “understanding”, but defangs and dismantles them. These range from the Talban and Haqqani network, active in Afghanistan, to the Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, operating against India. China should be reminded to fulfil its obligations, agreed to during the BRICS Summit, to pressuride Pakistan to act against designated terrorist groups. The international community and multilateral financial Institutions like World Bank should be asked to link development funding for Pakistan to action against terrorism. President Trump will, hopefully, take up these issues when he visits China. But, ultimately much will depend on the ability of the Afghanistan government to develop an internal political consensus and effectively address issues of corruption, national security and economic development.Winter snows will soon close Himalayan mountain passes in Kashmir. India should be ready with effective covert, pre-emptive and proactive measures to respond effectively to infiltration across the LoC, when the snows melt in 2018.


Pakistan’s General Problem.

How Pakistan’s Generals turned the country into an international jihadi tourist resort BY Mohammad Hanif
(Mohammed Hanif is the author of A Case of Exploding Mangoes(2008), his first novel, a satire on the death of General Zia ul Haq)
What is the last thing you say to your best general when ordering him into a do-or-die mission? A prayer maybe, if you are religiously inclined. A short lecture, underlining the importance of the mission, if you want to keep it businesslike. Or maybe you’ll wish him good luck accompanied by a clicking of the heels and a final salute.
On the night of 5 July 1977 as Operation Fair Play, meant to topple Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s elected government, was about to commence, then Army Chief General Zia ul Haq took aside his right-hand man and Corps Commander of 10th Corps Lieutenant General Faiz Ali Chishti and whispered to him: “Murshid, marwa na daina.” (Guru, don’t get us killed.)
General Zia was indulging in two of his favourite pastimes: spreading his paranoia amongst those around him and sucking up to a junior officer he needed to do his dirty work. General Zia had a talent for that; he could make his juniors feel as if they were indispensable to the running of this world. And he could make his seniors feel like proper gods, as Bhutto found out to his cost.
General Faiz Ali Chishti’s troops didn’t face any resistance that night; not a single shot was fired, and like all military coups in Pakistan, this was also dubbed a ‘bloodless coup’. There was a lot of bloodshed, though, in the following years—in military-managed dungeons, as pro-democracy students were butchered at Thori gate in interior Sindh, hundreds of shoppers were blown up in Karachi’s Bohri Bazar, in Rawalpindi people didn’t even have to leave their houses to get killed as the Army’s ammunition depot blew up raining missiles on a whole city, and finally at Basti Laal Kamal near Bahawalpur, where a plane exploded killing General Zia and most of the Pakistan Army’s high command. General Faiz Ali Chishti had nothing to do with this, of course. General Zia had managed to force his murshid into retirement soon after coming to power. Chishti had started to take that term of endearment—murshid—a bit too seriously and dictators can’t stand anyone who thinks of himself as a kingmaker.
Thirty-four years on, Pakistan is a society divided at many levels. There are those who insist on tracing our history to a certain September day in 2001, and there are those who insist that this country came into being the day the first Muslim landed on the Subcontinent. There are laptop jihadis, liberal fascist and fair-weather revolutionaries. There are Balochi freedom fighters up in the mountains and bullet-riddled bodies of young political activists in obscure Baloch towns. And, of course, there are the members of civil society with a permanent glow around their faces from all the candle-light vigils. All these factions may not agree on anything but there is consensus on one point: General Zia’s coup was a bad idea. When was the last time anyone heard Nawaz Sharif or any of Zia’s numerous protégés thump their chest and say, yes, we need another Zia? When did you see a Pakistan military commander who stood on Zia’s grave and vowed to continue his mission?
It might have taken Pakistanis 34 years to reach this consensus but we finally agree that General Zia’s domestic and foreign policies didn’t do us any good. It brought us automatic weapons, heroin and sectarianism; it also made fortunes for those who dealt in these commodities. And it turned Pakistan into an international jihadi tourist resort.
And yet, somehow, without ever publicly owning up to it, the Army has continued Zia’s mission. Successive Army commanders, despite their access to vast libraries and regular strategic reviews, have never actually acknowledged that the multinational, multicultural jihadi project they started during the Zia era was a mistake. Late Dr Eqbal Ahmed, the Pakistani teacher and activist, once said that the Pakistan Army is brilliant at collecting information but its ability to analyse this information is non-existent.
Looking back at the Zia years, the Pakistan Army seems like one of those mythical monsters that chops off its own head but then grows an identical one and continues on the only course it knows.
In 1999, two days after the Pakistan Army embarked on its Kargil misadventure, Lieutenant General Mahmud Ahmed gave a ‘crisp and to the point’ briefing to a group of senior Army and Air Force officers. Air Commodore Kaiser Tufail, who attended the meeting, later wrote that they were told that it was nothing more than a defensive manoeuvre and the Indian Air Force will not get involved at any stage. “Come October, we shall walk into Siachen—to mop up the dead bodies of hundreds of Indians left hungry, out in the cold,” General Mahmud told the meeting. “Perhaps it was the incredulousness of the whole thing that led Air Commodore Abid Rao to famously quip, ‘After this operation, it’s going to be either a Court Martial or Martial Law!’ as we walked out of the briefing room,” Air Commodore Tufail recalled in an essay.
If Rao Abid even contemplated a court martial, he probably lacked leadership qualities because there was only one way out of this mess—a humiliating military defeat, a world-class diplomatic disaster, followed by yet another martial law. The man who should have faced court martial for Kargil appointed himself Pakistan’s President for the next decade.
General Mahmud went on to command ISI, Rao Abid retired as air vice marshal, both went on to find lucrative work in the Army’s vast welfare empire, and Kargil was forgotten as if it was a game of dare between two juveniles who were now beyond caring about who had actually started the game. Nobody remembers that a lot of blood was shed on this pointless Kargil mission. The battles were fierce and some of the men and officers fought so valiantly that two were awarded Pakistan’s highest military honour, Nishan-e-Haidar. There were hundreds of others whose names never made it to any awards list, whose families consoled themselves by saying that their loved ones had been martyred while defending our nation’s borders against our enemy. Nobody pointed out the basic fact that there was no enemy on those mountains before some delusional generals decided that they would like to mop up hundreds of Indian soldiers after starving them to death.
The architect of this mission, the daring General Pervez Musharraf, who didn’t bother to consult his colleagues before ordering his soldiers to their slaughter, doesn’t even have the wits to face a sessions court judge in Pakistan, let alone a court martial. The only people he feels comfortable with are his Facebook friends and that too from the safety of his London apartment. During the whole episode, the nation was told that it wasn’t the regular army that was fighting in Kargil; it was the mujahideen. But those who received their loved ones’ flag-draped coffins had sent their sons and brothers to serve in a professional army, not a freelance lashkar.
The Pakistan Army’s biggest folly has been that under Zia it started outsourcing its basic job—soldiering—to these freelance militants. By blurring the line between a professional soldier—who, at least in theory, is always required to obey his officer, who in turn is governed by a set of laws—and a mujahid, who can pick and choose his cause and his commander depending on his mood, the Pakistan Army has caused immense confusion in its own ranks. Our soldiers are taught to shout Allah-o-Akbar when mocking an attack. In real life, they are ambushed by enemies who shout Allah-o-Akbar even louder. Can we blame them if they dither in their response? When the Pakistan Navy’s main aviation base in Karachi, PNS Mehran, was attacked, Navy Chief Admiral Nauman Bashir told us that the attackers were ‘very well trained’. We weren’t sure if he was giving us a lazy excuse or admiring the creation of his institution. When naval officials told journalists that the attackers were ‘as good as our own commandoes’ were they giving themselves a backhanded compliment?
In the wake of the attacks on PNS Mehran in Karachi, some TV channels have pulled out an old war anthem sung by late Madam Noor Jehan and have started to play it in the backdrop of images of young, hopeful faces of slain officers and men. Written by the legendary teacher and poet Sufi Tabassum, the anthem carries a clear and stark warning: Aiay puttar hatantay nahin wickday, na labhdi phir bazaar kuray (You can’t buy these brave sons from shops, don’t go looking for them in bazaars).
While Sindhis and Balochis have mostly composed songs of rebellion, Punjabi popular culture has often lionised its karnails and jarnails and even an odd dholsipahi. The Pakistan Army, throughout its history, has refused to take advice from politicians as well as thinking professionals from its own ranks. It has never listened to historians and sometimes ignored even the esteemed religious scholars it frequently uses to whip up public sentiments for its dirty wars. But the biggest strategic mistake it has made is that it has not even taken advice from the late Madam Noor Jehan, one of the Army’s most ardent fans in Pakistan’s history. You can probably ignore Dr Eqbal Ahmed’s advice and survive in this country but you ignore Madam at your own peril.
Since the Pakistan Army’s high command is dominated by Punjabi-speaking generals, it’s difficult to fathom what it is about this advice that they didn’t understand. Any which way you translate it, the message is loud and clear. And lyrical: soldiers are not to be bought and sold like a commodity. “Na  awaian takran maar kuray” (That search is futile, like butting your head against a brick wall), Noor Jehan goes on to rhapsodise.
For decades, the Army has not only shopped for these private puttarsin the bazaars, it also set up factories to manufacture them. It raised whole armies of them. When you raise Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish Mohammed, Sipahe Sahaba, Sipahe Mohammed, Lashker Jhangvi, Al- Badar Mujahideen, others encouraged by the thriving market place will go ahead and start outfits like Anjuman Tahuffuze Khatame Nabuwat and Anjuman Tahuffuze Namoos-e-Aiyasha. It’s not just Kashmir and Afghanistan and Chechnya they will want to liberate, they will also go back in time and seek revenge for a perceived slur that may or may not have been cast by someone more than 1,300 years ago in a country far far away.
As if the Army’s sprawling shopping mall of private puttars in Pakistan wasn’t enough, it actively encouraged import and export of these commodities, even branched out into providing rest and recreation facilities for the ones who wanted a break. The outsourcing of Pakistan’s military strategy has reached a point where mujahids have their own mujahids to do their job, and inevitably at the end of the supply chain are those faceless and poor teenagers with explosives strapped to their torsos regularly marched out to blow up other poor kids.
Two days before the Americans killed Osama bin Laden and took away his bullet-riddled body, General Kiyani addressed Army cadets at Kakul. After declaring a victory of sorts over the militants, he gave our nation a stark choice. And before the nation could even begin to weigh its pros and cons, he went ahead and decided for them: we shall never bargain our honour for prosperity. As things stand, most people in Pakistan have neither honour nor prosperity and will easily settle for their little world not blowing up every day.
The question people really want to ask General Kiyani is that if he and his Army officer colleagues can have both honour and prosperity, why can’t we the people have a tiny bit of both?
The Army and its advocates in the media often worry about Pakistan’s image, as if we are not suffering from a long-term serious illness but a seasonal bout of acne that just needs better skin care. The Pakistan Army, over the years, has cultivated this image of 180 million people with nuclear devices strapped to their collective body threatening to take the world down with it. We may not be able to take the world down with us; the world might defang us or try to calm us down by appealing to our imagined Sufi side. But the fact remains that Pakistan as a nation is paying the price for our generals’ insistence on acting, in Asma Jahangir’s frank but accurate description, like duffers.
And demanding medals and golf resorts for being such duffers consistently for such a long time.
What people really want to do at this point is put an arm around our military commanders’ shoulders, take them aside and whisper in their ears: “Murshid, marwa na daina.”

Mrs India Earth wants to work for war widows

Mrs India Earth wants to work for war widows
Sonika Sharma being crowned Mrs India Earth 2017.

Vikram Sharma

Tribune News Service

Jammu, October 16

Sonika Sharma, 40, Mrs India Earth 2017 has expressed her desire to work for addressing the miseries of the war widows of Bhadurgarh, Rajasthan.Wife of an Army officer Colonel Yogesh Sharma and mother of 12-year-old daughter and 8-year-old son, Sonika said before competing for the pageant, she had a vision to do something for war widows, but now she owns the responsibility to be with them for their betterment.“The Army supports war widows to all extent, but still they remain struggle while completing the formalities, which adds to their miseries. I want to be with them and help them secure their life,” Sonika added. She informed that Bhadurgah village in Rajasthan was a place where most of the war widows live as almost every household in the village had a male serving in the Army.“Many Army officers of the village have lost their lives while performing their duties in different conflict zones. I have a great yearning to be among these widows, listen to the heroic acts of their men and help them in all possible ways,” she said.Sonika clinched the coveted trophy after competing with 48 other finalists drawn from India and abroad as well. The pageant was conducted by Ritika Vinay Asia Pacific while Bollywood celebrities Mahima Chaudhary and lyricist Sameer were the judges.Sonika wore a Dogri dress in the traditional round of the Mrs India Earth pageant. She is actively involved in environmental control activities and has been working for the handicapped and underprivileged children. Besides, she is a fitness freak and runs up to 50 km in a week. She has also taken part in three premium half marathons representing Jammu.Sonika is the principal at Akhnoor Army School. She is also into fashion designing and has produced great quality fashion outfits for women.


भूतपूर्व सैनिक बनवायें अपना NEW ECHS CARD पुराना कार्ड होगा रद्द जानें क्यों 16 Nov,( 2017 Order)

http://