Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

Epic Battles: Revisiting Jaswantgarh And Rezangla Of 1962 On Their Anniversaries by Syed Ata Hasnain

The Jaswantgarh war memorialThe Jaswantgarh war memorial
Snapshot
  • Fifty-five years ago, this day, the heroic battle of Jaswantgarh was fought and here’s an account of how 4 Garhwal Rifles along with the Garhwali Bhullas stood up to the aggressor with valour.

17 and 18 November 1962 are two days enshrined boldly in India’s abundant military heritage. These two dates, so close to each other, symbolise valour and sacrifice of the highest order; they relate to the Sino-Indian Border Conflict 1962. As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) fought a largely unprepared Indian Army, thrust into battle at foreboding heights in winter, post after post and defended area after another fell in the way of its advance. Almost a month after the Chinese launched their invasion on 20 October 1962 in NEFA and Ladakh gaining large tracts of territory and forcing the Indian Army to withdraw, two brave units fought an epic battle, each to bloody the Chinese and restore the image of the Indian Army. Coincidentally, one battle was in each of the two theatres of conflict – NEFA (now Arunachal Pradesh) and Ladakh.

A bust of Major Shaitan Singh (Medovar/Wikimedia Commons)A bust of Major Shaitan Singh (Medovar/Wikimedia Commons)

On 18 November 1962, in the forward defences of Chushul in the Eastern Ladakh sector, an Ahir company of 13 Kumaon under the command of Major Shaitan Singh, Param Vir Chakra (posthumous), withstood a series of attacks on its position and imposed heavy casualties on the enemy. This company occupying defences at Rezangla, provided depth to the Chushul Bowl, which was defended by 114 Infantry Brigade. In the morning of 18 November 1962, the Chinese PLA contacted the defences of one of the forward platoons. From then onwards it was a battle of attrition between them and the Kumaonis. Outgunned and outnumbered, the Kumaonis stuck on with the age old doctrine adage – ‘last man, last round’. Inspiring this obstinate stand and refusal to withdrawal was the company commander Maj Shaitan Singh who too was finally martyred. 13 Kumaon lost 114 all ranks and nine were severely wounded. This was a classic case of employment of sound sub unit tactics and it resulted in hundreds of PLA soldiers being killed. 13 Kumaon was bestowed with the battle honour Rezangla, the only honour granted for operations in Ladakh.

The second battle honour of 1962 was bestowed on 4 Garhwal Rifles (Garh Rif), for the heroic performance of the unit at Nuranang now called Jaswantgarh on 17 November 1962. It was the only battle honour won by a unit in the eastern theatre in 1962. 4 Garh Rif is my unit; raised by my father in 1959. I was its 14th Commanding Officer. This write up is not a tactical explanation of the battle of Jaswantgarh. It is simply a rendering of a layman account for public knowledge of what really happened and how the unit stood out so valiantly. It is my dedication to the three officers, four Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs), 147 other ranks and seven non combatant tradesmen who were martyred at the Battle of Jaswantgarh. I knew almost all of them having been a six year old with the unit when it was raised. The unit is celebrating and marking the 55th anniversary of the battle on 17 November 2017, located far into the mountains of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) where this year on Independence Day it was again the recipient of the largest number of honours and awards for its spectacular operation against infiltrating Pakistani terrorists. The operation was quoted to me by none other than Gen Bipin Rawat, Chief of Army Staff (COAS); he described the conduct as a copy book model for counter infiltration operations.

Before going on to provide a non tactical explanation of the battle of Jaswantgarh, it may be motivating for the reader to be aware of what Lt Gen BM Kaul wrote about the unit in his book The Untold Story. Describing the performance of units on the eastern front, he wrote “if more units of the Indian Army had fought the way 4 Garh Rif did, the history of the 1962 War may perhaps have been different”

In mid 1962 the unit was serving at Ramgarh, Bihar, and had just returned from counter insurgency operations in Nagaland. In September, it received its mobilisation orders and moved to Chardwar, near Rangia, Assam. As the Chinese threat increased progressively, the unit moved up from Tezpur and was deployed north west of the Tawang Chhu river. It did extensive patrolling and dominated the Tawang area. C company under its company commander, Maj (later Col) Hasta Bahadur Rai, patrolled the upper reaches of Tawang to prevent any infiltration.

When the Chinese attacked on 20 October 1962, the operations commenced from Thagla on the flank and then moved on to Bumla. The aim was to outflank and get to Tawang at the earliest before resting the front on the Tawang Chhu River to allow road building, move up of artillery and build up of logistics. Maj Rai’s company went out of communication with the battalion HQ and fell back much later as the withdrawal to own side of Tawang Chhu commenced through the bridge of Jang. (Please refer to the not to scale sketch in which most landmarks being referred here are reflected).

Schematic sketch showing the advance of the Chinese to Sela between 20 October and 20 November 1962.Schematic sketch showing the advance of the Chinese to Sela between 20 October and 20 November 1962.

The first phase of the Chinese operations ceased with the fall of Tawang. 4 Garh Rif was not involved in any of the serious fighting till then. It had reinforced Bumla with a company for a short while before operations commenced, but it withdrew on orders well before. With the Indian Army defeated and pushed back behind the Tawang Chhu, HQ 4 Infantry Division under Maj Gen MS Pathania issued orders for the occupation of Sela, the highest pass in the area, and its preparation as the new main position. In order to do this, it was necessary to keep the Chinese reconnaissance parties at bay and prevent them from crossing the Tawang Chhu.

It was also necessary that should the Chinese decide to attack earlier there should be sufficient organised defence ahead of Sela, the new main position where the ultimate battle would be fought for the restoration of the prestige of the Indian Army and the defeat of the PLA. Such a task is performed by what is called ‘covering troops’ by deploying ahead, absorbing the initial weight of the attack and preventing contact with the main defences. 4 Garh Rif was given the onerous task of occupying Nuranang, between Sela and Jang, as a covering position and performed the role of covering troops.

An inscription at the war memorialAn inscription at the war memorial

In current times you can drive from Tezpur to Tenga, break journey for the night before you start the next day, the arduous but highly picturesque drive to Sela (13,500 feet) via Roopa, Bomdila and Baisakhi. As you descend from Sela towards Jang, approximately 11 km away is a huge memorial, dedicated to the battle for the covering position at Nuranang fought valiantly by the unit. It succeeded in giving the Chinese a bloody nose. The memorial has changed shape and size many times but it has never lost the reverence of the local people, the Monpas nor that of the hordes of travellers who now halt to stretch, photograph, consume glasses of tea and pay obeisance at the virtual shrine which has emerged over a period of time. The shrine next to the memorial is that of Jaswant Baba. It’s a post martyrdom personification giving him great reverence. Jaswant was a rifleman of 4 Garh Rif. He earned a Mahavir Chakra posthumously for his gallant action at Nuranang. In his memory and honour, Nuranang is now called Jaswantgarh; it’s actually the location of the battlefield which is called by that name.

Here is a description of that heroic display by the unit at Jaswantgarh:

After the fall of Tawang, as the unit withdrew through Jang, almost the last unit to do so, the iron bridge over the river Tawang Chhu was finally destroyed as a reserved demolition. Alfa company under the command of 2/Lt (later colonel) S N Tandon was deployed at the current location of the memorial at the plateau which falls steeply towards the road going down to Jang. The battalion HQ, a company and the three-inch mortars were deployed approximately 1.5 km towards Sela, along the track. One company occupied the high ground to the north across the road and beyond the deep depression through which the Nuranang river flows. The fourth company was towards the south and slightly west of the memorial area covering the southern approach.

By 16 November 1962, the defences were in reasonable state although there was little overhead protection. The defences were being constantly shelled by the Chinese who had good observation from across the Tawang Chhu. Our artillery observation post officers also did likewise against PLA deployment. In the interim the CO, Lt Col (let Maj Gen) BM Bhattacharjee, decided to send some patrols to dominate the forward zone. One of these patrols led by 2/Lt Vinod Goswami volunteered to cross the Tawang Chhu by improvised means to ascertain strength and deployment of the PLA and if possible to capture a Chinese prisoner. The patrol moved by stealth, performed its task. While returning it targeted a PLA bunker and captured a sentry alive. Unfortunately, while bringing the prisoner across the Tawang Chhu it became extremely difficult to handle him as he was also wounded. He was finally abandoned believed dead. Goswami led some other daring missions during the run up to the battle at Jaswantgarh.

Finally on the night of 16/17 November, almost in sync with operations at Rezangla, the Chinese commenced phase two of their offensive. Probing actions against Alfa company were made by Chinese dressed as Monpa women but the troops (Bhullas) responded in time. Through 17 November and till the night of 17/18 November the location came under five heavy attacks and all were beaten back. After the third attempt, the Chinese managed to deploy a heavy machine gun (HMG) on the left (southern flank of Alfa company and its fire made it impossible for the Bhullas to fight effectively. This was the crucial moment. A party of three volunteers was formed. It comprised L/Nk Trilok Singh, riflemen Gopal Singh and Jaswant Singh. This party moved first by stealth and then under covering fire. In a hand to hand melee lasting several minutes the HMG was silenced and the crew was killed.

The bold action involved Trilok providing covering fire from a short distance away while Jaswant and Gopal assaulted and beheaded the PLA detachment with khukris. While recovering the weapon and dragging it back, Jaswant was killed by a burst. Trilok similarly died when the Chinese targeted him realising that it was his fire which had enabled the action. Gopal succeeded in returning with the weapon. The area around Alfa company and the slope towards Jang was strewn with a large number of bodies of PLA soldiers. The fourth and fifth PLA attacks were equally ferocious virtually following the tactics of human waves. However, Number 3 Platoon of Alfa company, under Sub Jatan Singh held on tenaciously.

As the battle was enjoined and the Garhwalis were creating history, the Chinese probed the flanks from a wide arc infiltrating self contained troops into the depth areas north and south of Sela. The pass was well stocked for battle and nearing completion of its defences, which were spread on both shoulders. Unfortunately there remained a perception in the mind of senior commanders about the invincibility of the Chinese soldier and an image of them being 10 feet tall, persisted. The masterful resistance by the Garhwalis at Jaswantgarh could not alter that perception.

As reports of Chinese infiltration came into HQ 4 Infantry Division there was panic, and orders to withdraw from Jaswantgarh were issued even as 4 Garh Rif was ready for more. It had sustained very few casualties, in fact, just three killed and a few wounded. Its three remaining companies were largely untouched except for shelling. However, through 18-19 November the unit withdrew on orders and reached Sela. There, the Commander 62 Infantry Brigade, the famous Brig Hoshiar Singh, briefed Lt Col Bhattacharjee. Two columns for the withdrawal to Bomdila were formed one each under the Commander and the CO. Two companies each of 4 Garh Rif formed the protection of each columns, which had many HQ personnel and stragglers withdrawing in panic.

The two columns ran into a series of Chinese ambushes as they tried cross country movements. In one of the ambushes, Brig Hoshiar Singh is reputed to have been wounded and captured. His refusal to submit to his captors is reputed to have enraged them leading to him being killed in cold blood. The Chinese strength of infiltrators far outnumbered the strength of the withdrawing columns. The attrition on the ambushes was intense and the troops dispersed in small groups many crossing into Bhutan on the west and made their way towards the rear, suffering intense cold with many cases of frost bite. Many were taken prisoner, including Lt Col BM Bhattacharjee and the Adjutant Capt Dharam Pal. Major HB Rai, 2/Lt SN Tandon and 2/Lt RP Singh were among the prisoners. 2/Lt VInod Goswami, Lt Hari Kishen Dev and Capt BK Nath(RMO) were killed at unknown places and time during the withdrawal.

The Garhwalis proved heroic in the custody of the Chinese too. They were singled out for maltreatment because of their stiff resistance at Jaswantgarh. Capt Dharampal was tortured and placed in isolated confinement due to his numerous attempts at escape. He was my first CO when I was commissioned in 1974. The strength of martyrs of the unit amounted to three officers, four JCOs, 147 ORs and seven non combatised tradesmen. A very large number became winter casualties. When the unit assembled at Ramgarh, the new CO Lt Col IS Rawat, KC had to virtually carry out re-raising. All citations were sent under his pen after meticulously charting out events from interviews with the men. The unit had lost its war diary and all its property. The citations led to award of two Maha Vir Chakra (MVC), 7 Vir Chakra (VrCs), 6 SMS and a host of other awards. Lt Col BM Bhattacharjee and Rifleman Jaswant received the MVC; among the VrC winners were L/Nk Trilok Singh, Rifleman Gopal Singh, 2/Lt SN Tandon, 2/Lt VINOD Goswami and Subedar Jatan Singh Gusain. The unit was finally awarded the battle honour Nuranang which is colloquially called Jaswantgarh.

Unfortunately the local people have created a myth around the battle of Jaswantgarh, crediting the resistance and heroic action only to Jaswant Singh and two young girls, Nura and Sela, who allegedly helped him resist the Chinese. Local folklore has it that the Chinese finally captured Jaswant Singh and beheaded him, taking his head away as trophy. These tales have their own place and have been written about and romanticised by media; even a film is being made about the myth of Jaswant Singh.

The only truth lies in the historical record of The Garhwal Rifles and the great spoken reputation that the Garhwali Bhullas acquired after the heroic battle of Jaswantgarh. Today, on 17 November, on the 55th anniversary of the battle, we, the members of the community of the Jaswantgarh Battalion bow our heads in reverence to our ancestors and resolve never to let down the reputation and name of the Nation and the Regiment.

This has to end with the war cries of the Garhwalis and Kumaonis.

Kalika Mata Ki Jai! (war cry of the Kumaonis).

Bol Badri Vishal Lal Ki Jai! (victory to the followers of Badri Vishal). Badri Vishal is the personification of Lord Vishnu, the presiding deity of the Garhwalis.

Jai Hind!

The author is a second generation officer of 4 Garhwal Rifles, the unit which fought at Jaswantgarh. He was its 14th Commanding Officer.


Two summits & an agenda by KC Singh

Two summits & an agenda
Big picture: PM Modi must realise the real challenge is without, not within.

KC Singh

THIS week focus returns to Asia as two major summits — Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and East Asia Summit (EAS) — are held in Vietnam and the Philippines, respectively. India is not a member of the first, though desirous of joining it. PM Narendra Modi shall interrupt relentless campaigning in Gujarat to attend the latter on November 12. US President Donald Trump, combining bilateral visits to Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), China, Vietnam and the Philippines with attending both summits, heightens interest, particularly as earlier he was skipping the EAS. Chinese President Xi Jinping, newly endorsed for a second five-year term by the 19th Party Congress, attending the APEC Summit completes the Asian drama. The US State Department announced that Trump’s focus would be on neutralising nuclear threat from the Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK), promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific (euphemism for contesting Chinese corralling of two- thirds of South China Sea, via artificial island building) and reciprocal trade, i.e., balancing the huge US trade imbalances with China, Japan and ROK. Trump is also expected to reassure allies and partners concerned over perceived US retreat from the region. Essentially, the summits this year are a power play between the US and China and a contest between two alternative visions of growth and governance. The Western liberal, democratic and free trade model is posited against the Chinese model, fine-tuned by President Xi, of economic success through centralised and authoritarian management underpinned by  nationalism minus civil liberties and elective government. The 19th Chinese Party Congress has allowed Xi to consolidate power and perhaps become the most powerful leader since Mao Zedong, with allies and followers controlling important institutions. Significantly, no clear successor is visible, thus breaching injunction by Deng Xiaoping, father of the Chinese economic miracle that his successors would only hold two five-year terms. Among the seven-member standing committee of the politburo, the de facto Chinese cabinet, is Wang Huning — professor, ideologue and adviser to all post-Deng presidents. He devised the “Three Represents” of President Jiang Zemin, recommending party reachout to private business and professionals and is now behind “Xi Jinping Thought” embedded in the constitution. He has, over decades, provided intellectual ballast to Chinese rulers’ view that social and economic change can only be accomplished by centralised and authoritarian rule, while freezing political evolution. The Tiananmen Square uprising by students in 1989 was taken by them as confirming its validity. Xi has added an anti-graft edge, thus enhancing his own “legitimacy”, which in Chinese tradition is called the “Mandate of Heaven”. Ensuing public support has enabled him to purge potential rivals or dissenters.At the 19th Congress, President Xi reiterated his “China Dream” to make the nation a “basically modernised nation” by 2035 and a “rich and powerful socialist nation” by 2050. The 21st century continental and maritime Silk Route, called the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is the next step to achieve this. It is imagined as a Sino-centric network for trade and investments to rival, if not supplant, existing post-World War II architecture created by the West under US leadership. The Xi-Trump summit thus assumes importance. China seeking “great power relationship” is nothing but a desire for the US to accept them as the only “other” in a bipolar engagement. Trump has frequently praised Xi in the past, even calling him “King of China”, perhaps in line with his penchant for authoritarian rulers, assuming he can flatter them for a shortcut to strategic compromise. Trump would seek China to compel DPRK to accept nuclear restraint, if not disarmament; balance bilateral trade; and end Chinese predatory trading practices and poaching of intellectual property. Xi will tactically yield some ground but is unlikely to kow-tow fully. Asian neighbours of China, concerned over Trump’s erratic and vacillating policy making, must devise alternative strategies, assuming Trump will, at best, henceforth, be an off-shore balancer. In a Pew Research Centre poll, only 24 per cent Japanese trust Trump compared to 78 per cent giving thumbs up to former President Barack Obama. PM Shinzo Abe is hewing a path by not allowing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) to collapse, inviting 11 members, minus the US which quit, to a meeting before Trump’s visit. He has also resurrected and elevated to political level the 2007 meeting of Australia, India, Japan and the US, dubbed the Quad — a gathering of major regional democracies, expandable to include others later. As a swing power, India must use these emerging China-containing mechanisms as, indeed, alternative groupings, where China and India share space, for instance BRICS, etc. Meanwhile, authoritarianism is spreading globally like a pandemic. Polls in India indicate a vast majority preferring a “strong” ruler. The play book is almost identical, despite differences in political and historical contexts. Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman in Saudi Arabia or President Xi in China or PM Modi in India use anti-corruption crusades to purge rivals, isolate opponents and bolster public image. Trump himself operates beyond the confines of own party and the Congress, sustained by social media. Nationalism becomes the handmaiden to suppress dissent and demoralise, or even silence media. Differences of power use or abuse are obliterated between authoritarian rulers straddling different political systems. An Atlantic Council study predicts Indo-Pacific as globally the most economically dynamic region by 2050. With a fundamental power shift underway, the study concludes a “Trans-Pacific century” has already begun. China’s BRI, advances in Artificial Intelligence, Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank, renewal energy advances and rededication to futuristic industries is its path to growth and rapid power accrual. The BJP-led Modi government, meanwhile, expends energy on eliminating opposition and constant electioneering, implementing ambitious, but poorly conceived schemes like demonetisation and now GST, corralling media, exulting in selective positive economic news and soaring stock market. The bubble may be more than in share prices and reality has been known to prick it inopportunely. PM Modi has a narrowing window to close ranks domestically and realise his challenge is without, not within. Unless he self-corrects soon, like Rajiv Gandhi in 1984 when China under Deng Xiaoping had only a four-year head-start over India, his would be a wasted mandate. The writer is a former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs


China objects to Defence Minister Sitharaman’s visit to Arunachal

China objects to Defence Minister Sitharaman’s visit to Arunachal

Sitharaman on Sunday visited forward army posts in remote Anjaw district of Arunachal Pradesh bordering China to take stock of the defence preparedness. PTI file

Beijing, November 6

China on Monday objected to Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s first visit to Arunachal Pradesh, saying her tour of the “disputed area” is not conducive to the peace and tranquillity in the region.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Sitharaman on Sunday visited forward army posts in remote Anjaw district of Arunachal Pradesh bordering China to take stock of the defence preparedness.

“As to Indian Defence Minister visit to Arunachal Pradesh, you must be very clear about China’s position,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told a media briefing.

“There is a dispute on the eastern section of the China-India boundary. So this visit by the Indian side to the disputed area is not conducive to the peace and tranquillity of the relevant region,” she said in a response to a question.

The Indian side should work with the Chinese side to make contribution to properly revolving the issue through dialogue and create enabling environment and conditions, she said.

“Hope India will work China for the shared goal, seek a solution acceptable to both sides and accommodate our concerns in a balanced way,” she said.

China claims Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet and routinely objects to top Indian officials’ visit to the area.

The Line of Actual Control (LAC) between India and China stretches to 3,488 kms. Both sides have held 19 rounds of talks by the Special Representatives to resolve the dispute.

Sitharaman had visited Nathu La area on the India-China border in Sikkim last month and greeted the People’s Liberation Army soldiers across the border. PTI


Guru Nanak Gurpurab: A Dedication To The Brave Sikh Community by Lt Gen (retd) Syed Ata Hasnain

A Sikh devotee takes bath in the holy sarovar and pays obeisance at Golden Temple in Amritsar. (Sameer Sehgal/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

SNAPSHOT

The Sikh community celebrates the birth anniversary of the first Sikh guru, Guru Nanak, on 4 November this year.

Lt Gen (retd) Syed Ata Hasnain writes about this brave and generous community on the occasion of Gurpurab.

My years in the Indian Army, as an Army brat and an officer, taught me the love and respect I carry for all faiths and ethnicities in India. It’s a part of service life because one has friends, superiors and subordinates from all over India, representing the country’s vast diversity. Most of all, those years instilled in me the realisation that not many nations give their citizens a chance to share their lives with people from a diverse stock. Being a part of the services community was an education in sensitivity and pride in the wider plurality of India. The Army, of course, is a great example of unity in diversity, India’s greatest asset and contribution to humanity.

On Gurpurab, my sincere good wishes to our Sikh friends and indeed to the Sikh people all over the world. I wish to convey to them that they follow a great faith, sensitive in respect for others, rich in its history of sacrifice and unique for its great sense of tolerance for plurality. They are a people famous for loyalty and friendship. To them I doff my hat because they contribute to India’s uniqueness far more in proportion than the numbers they exist in. When a flood hits Kashmir, it is their gurudwaras which contribute food packets in hundreds, all cooked by volunteers. When Muslims do not have a place to offer their Eid namaaz, they offer them the facilities of their gurudwaras. When Rohingyas at the far away borders become refugees, Sikhs offer them solace and relief without asking for anything in return. Is there anything Sikhs do not do to enhance feelings of oneness among human beings?

Once I was invited to a college in Ludhiana to deliver a motivational talk to a group of people. There was a large Sikh presence in the audience – people of all ages and professions. I was clear in my mind about what needed to be spoken. Commencing slowly and softly, I stated that I was a reluctant speaker because I knew I was addressing a great community of people. I told them I had not come to Ludhiana to motivate them because in my opinion the Sikh community needed no encouragement and no motivation; in fact, I had come to be motivated by their collective presence, by their history of courage and fortitude, their passion for life and, most of all, their humility; the followers of the great Guru Gobind Singh needed no one to come and give them lectures in courage and motivation. The tears in the eyes said it all. It’s a memory close to my heart.

How does humility connect with Sikhism? For those who may never have had the pleasure and honour to visit a gurudwara, it’s a visual treat to observe the cleanliness around; volunteers there can put any ‘swachch’ campaign to shame. The devotion is intense, with volunteers undertaking every possible chore to make the community event successful. You won’t ever feel the need to secure your footwear because there will be many people to protect your possessions with their lives. The ‘guru ka langar’ or the community lunch eaten together by devotees, is an exercise in devotion, love and humility. Volunteers cook up a simple fare, but the divine hand of the gurus instills in that fare a taste which you cannot find anywhere. The driest of rotis and the simplest of dals (lentils) combine to give the flavour of the gods. Anyone and everyone are welcome with no questions asked. Stories abound of experiences of people who have stopped at gurudwaras in emergencies and had food served at odd hours, before they could even utter a word about their problem.

When it comes to fun and games, none can beat the Sikhs. They know how to laugh at themselves and can out-drink and out-dance anyone. Their boisterousness can be a tad unnerving for a few of those who are more sedate in outlook. Friendships with them come from the oddest of things. During my school days at the hostel, at the beginning of the year I always feared having my bed next to a Sikh friend. For no other reason but that I had to rise 30 minutes earlier to help my young friend to wrap up his turban in that amazing thing called a pooni(wrapped turban cloth). Young Sikh boys wrestling with outsized turbans, was a common sight in days when the patka was still passé and considered highly informal. Today, none of my Sikh friends allow me to help them with the poonibecause they refuse to believe my prowess and experience in this fine art.

Through my growing years, I was fortunate to see many Sikh units in my father’s command and equally many Sikh friends with their families who visited us and we them. The throaty cries of “bole so nihal, sat sri akal” from those days still reverberate in my memories.

In my years as a senior officer, I had my unique way of paying obeisance to Guru Nanak on Gurpurab. First, as much as could be helped, I had one of the Sikh units from my formation mount the residential guard or provide protection to a convoy of vehicles. This allowed me to visit them first thing in the morning and do a matha teko (prostration) at their small gurudwara. Second, I would use a helicopter to visit every Sikh unit of the formation, do a prostration at the unit gurudwaraand present sweets. The round robin would end at the unit deployed at the most difficult location. Guru ka langar would be partaken there with the troops and all devotees of the revered guru; many local villagers would usually join in.

The Army continues to be an institution which consciously promotes India’s unity in diversity through the ‘sarv dharm sthal’ concept; all faiths praying beneath one roof with symbols of every faith together on display. That is why a soldier is comfortable with any religious symbolism, any devotional music and with any sermon being addressed to him. It is because he is uniquely the Indian we all must desire to be.


Rising debt-trap Demonetisation spurred credit card trap

Rising debt-trap

Credit card holders’ collective liability to banks has soared to nearly 60,000 crore by the end of this September, a whop  ping 39 per cent jump in a year. Indeed, it is one of the side effects of demonetisation that was unleashed a year ago. Banks, particularly private ones, took advantage of this cash squeeze to boost credit card use; selling over 60 lakh credit cards in just one year. First time users of the plastic cards were thrilled by the new found power of nearly-unlimited purchase, unaware of its potential to land them in a debt-trap. They did not realise the ease of purchase had an attached cost – exorbitant interest rates of 40 per cent or more with the interest calculated on an average daily balance method. Banks justify the usurious interest rates in order to neutralise the impact of payment defaults. Thus, a credit card may well become an instrument non-performing asset (NPAs) for banks and debt-traps for customers. The credit card is one of the innovative and modern payment options. It is not an evil per se provided one knows how to uses it. A credit card comes in handy in cases of emergencies such as hospitalization or emergency travel. The smart user avails all its benefits including discounts, complimentary insurance, rewards points and special privileges associated with individual cards. To the frustration of banks, a smart user never allows any outstanding to accumulate. But, the temptation of ‘purchase now and pay later’ also encourages conspicuous consumption and some cardholders end up spending more on their ability to repay. Thus the debt-trap is created.Notwithstanding the accumulated arrears, banks aggressively promote their plastic cards. The industry is growing faster especially after last November’s demonetisation. It is intriguing; either the banks are sitting on another NPA bomb or they are minting money by charging high interest rates. This is alarming in either case. The card business needs to be properly regulated. Banks require to acquaint consumers unambiguously about every intricate detail associated with the usage of plastic cards. The RBI too should monitor interest rates charged by banks on credit cards.


Army to build foot overbridge in Mumbai, many wonder why

Army to build foot overbridge in Mumbai, many wonder why
Commuters queue up near the Elphinstone railway station foot overbridge, where a stampede killed 23 persons recently. PTI

Tribune News Service

Mumbai/New Delhi, October 31

The Army has been roped in to build foot overbridges at the Elphinstone road railway station in Mumbai where 23 persons were killed in a stampede a month ago.Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, along with Railway Minister Piyush Goyal and Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, visited the railway station with engineers from the Army this morning. Fadnavis said the new overbridge would be completed by January 31. (Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)The Army would also build foot overbridges at the Currey Road and Ambivali railway stations, Fadnavis said. While Currey station lies in Mumbai city limits, Ambivali lies between Kalyan and Kasara on the outskirts of the city. Earlier, the Railways had floated a tender for the construction of a foot overbridge at Elphinstone station. However, Goyal was told that the new bridge would take a year to complete. “We have decided to take help of the military…  as there is an urgent need to complete the bridges at the earliest. The three stations have been identified as these witness a very high footfall,” Goyal said.Sitharaman said this was the first time that the Army had been called in for carrying out civil work in the country’s financial capital. “The Army conducted a feasibility study to assess whether it could complete the work or contribute to the process,” Sitharaman added.The move, meanwhile, has led to severe criticism.

download

Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh, a 1965-war veteran, said “the Army’s job is to train for war and protect the country’s borders, not to build bridges and clean  roads”. He said there could be serious implications of such misuse of the armed forces by utilising their services for non-emergency civilian jobs.Urging Defence Minister Sitharaman to refrain from diverting critical defence resources to civilian works, he cited what he termed a mistake that Maj Gen BM Kaul, GOC of ‘Red Eagles’ 4th Division, had made before the 1962 war with China. The scandalous misuse by him of military manpower to build accommodation cost the Indian Army heavily during the Sino-Indian war, the Chief Minister said.The Defence Minister, instead of being party to this decision and announcing it with such pride, should have  rejected any such suggestion in the interest of the armed forces, Capt Amarinder said.

Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said the Army was supposed to be called in as a last resort at times of emergencies. “Now, it seems like it is the first number on speed dial,” he said. Congress’ Sanjay Nirupam said “calling in the Army to construct the bridges underlines the failure of BMC. Hope the Army will not be asked to fill potholes here”. 


China mulls 1,000-km tunnel to carry Brahmaputra water

Beijing, October 30

Chinese engineers are testing techniques that could be used to build a 1,000-km long tunnel, the world’s longest, to carry water from the Brahmaputra in Tibet close to Arunachal Pradesh to the parched Xinjiang region, a media report said today.The move, expected to “turn Xinjiang into California”, has raised concerns among environmentalists about its likely impact on the Himalayan region, a Hong Kong-based daily reported. The proposed tunnel, which would drop down from the world’s highest plateau in multiple sections connected by waterfalls, would provide water in China’s largest administrative division, comprising vast swathes of deserts and dry grasslands.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)The water would be diverted from the Yarlung Tsangpo river in southern Tibet, which turns into the Brahmaputra once it enters India, to the Taklamakan desert in Xinjiang. China’s longest tunnel is the 85-km Dahuofang water project in Liaoning province, while the world’s longest tunnel is the 137-km main water supply pipe beneath the city of New York.India, a riparian state, has already flagged its concerns to Beijing about various dams being built by it on the Brahmaputra, which is known as Yarlung Tsangpo in China.  Beijing has been assuring India and Bangladesh, which is also a recipient of the waters from the river, that its dams were of the run of river projects and not designed to storing water.Wang Wei, a researcher who helped draft the latest Tibet-Xinjiang water tunnel proposal, said over 100 scientists formed different teams for the nationwide research.  The team suggested to drain Brahmaputra at Sangri county in southern Tibet. — PTI

Commanders meet

  • Military commanders of India and China met at the Bum La (pass), north of the historic monastery town of Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh, on Monday
  • The Indian delegation was led by Brig MP Singh and the Chinese delegation by Sr Col Liu Jiang Xun
  • A defence spokesman said thaw in the relations was evident during the meeting as both delegations interacted in a free, congenial and cordial environment TNS

Hot pursuit: What India could learn from Russian history

Hot pursuit: What India could learn from Russian history

Adolphe Yvon. Marshal Ney supporting the rear guard during the retreat from Moscow (1856)

Adolphe Yvon. Marshal Ney supporting the rear guard during the retreat from Moscow (1856)

As India gains prominence on the global stage, it must emulate the Russian strategy of being ruthless towards its enemies.

As large, prosperous countries, Russia and India don’t covet foreign territory and rarely initiate wars. On the contrary, each has been subject to numerous invasions over the centuries. Both countries have fought cataclysmic wars that have shaped their geography as well as history. However, they differ not only in the conduct of their wars but also in the policy of hot pursuit, which is the undeniable right of the defending side.

While Russians usually decimate their attackers, ensuring that the enemy will think thrice before repeating his misadventure, India seems overly keen to offer the olive branch when destroying the enemy and taking the war into his heartland would have been the sensible decision.

The following case studies from both ancient and modern history offer a peek into the nature of war fighting in Russia and India. Hopefully, the next generation of Indian political leadership will not fritter away the gains made by the soldiers on the battlefield.

Semiramis and her tragic mistake

One of the earliest recorded attacks on India was by Semiramis, who ruled the Assyrian Empire during the years 811-806 BCE – or nearly 500 years before the invasion of Alexander of Macedon. According to the accounts of ancient Greek historians Diodorus and Ctesias, the warrior queen “resolved to subjugate the Indians on hearing that they were the most numerous of all nations, and possessed the largest and most beautiful country in the world”.

For two years preparations were made throughout her whole kingdom – modern day Iraq, Egypt, Turkey and parts of Central Asia. In the third year she collected 3,000,000 foot soldiers, 500,000 horsemen and 100,000 chariots. Beside these, 100,000 camels were covered with the sewn skins of black oxen and fitted with fake movable trunks in order to trick the Indians into believing that she had a large elephant corps as well.

According to Greeks accounts, Stabrobates, the king of the Indians, awaited the Assyrians on the bank of the Indus with an even larger force gathered from the whole of India. (Due to the peculiar Greek orthography we’ll probably never know his actual name. Perhaps Satyabrata. Indian records, if any, are lost.)

When Semiramis approached, Stabrobates sent messengers to meet her with the complaint that she was making war upon him though he had done her no wrong. In his letter he reproached her licentious life, and calling the gods to witness, threatened to crucify her if victorious.

Semiramis read the letter, laughed, and said that the Indians would find out her virtue by her actions. The fleet of the Indians lay ready for battle on the Indus. “Semiramis caused her ships to be put together, manned them with her bravest warriors, and, after a long and stubborn contest, the victory fell to her share. A thousand ships of the Indians were sunk and many prisoners taken.”

Stabrobates, pretending flight, led his army back from the Indus, but in reality he wished to induce the enemy to cross the river. When the massive Assyrian army passed over the Indus, Stabrobates wondered how they had procured so many elephants. The mystery was soon solved when some defectors from the enemy side told the Indians these were decoys.

In the ensuing battle, the soldiers of Semiramis resisted only a short time before the Indian elephants caused an immense slaughter. The Assyrians left their ranks and fled, and the king pressed forward against Semiramis. His arrow wounded her arm, and as she turned away his javelin struck her on the back. The wounded Semiramis escaped over the bridge to the other side of the Indus. “The Indians was warned by signs from heaven and their interpretation by the seers not to cross the river.” After exchanging prisoners Semiramis returned. She had lost two-thirds of her army.

Tragedy at Tarain

Arabs had been trying to invade India since the year 638 CE. However, it took them nearly seven decades to defeat the small, nearly barren and outermost kingdom of Sindh and that happened because of dissension in the Indian kingdom. Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad in his ‘Humanity at Death’s Door’ and Maulana Nadvi in his ‘Indo-Arab Relations’, write that between 638 CE and 711 CE, the Arabs launched as many as 15 attacks against Sindh by land and via sea. And it was only the last by Mohammed Bin Qasim in 711 that succeeded.

The Indian heartland continued to resist the Islamic armies for centuries. However, that was about to change.

In 1191 CE, Mohammad Ghori, the ruler of Afghanistan, invaded India but was defeated after a fierce battle in Tarain, near Delhi, by Prithviraj Chauhan, the ruler of Ajmer. Ghori was captured and should have been put to death for bringing death and destruction to India but Prithviraj, against the advice of his commanders and ministers, magnanimously let him go.

The Afghan returned in 1192 with an even bigger army, but Prithviraj did not treat the matter as urgent. He refused to recall his main army which was fighting in Bengal – a thousand miles to the east. The Indian king said he would lead his auxiliary army himself, instead of recalling his two leading commanders – who had defeated Ghori the previous year – from Bengal.

In the Second Battle of Tarain, Prithviraj initially had the upper hand but as per Hindu tradition he ordered his army to cease fighting after dusk. This saved the Muslim army from being slaughtered yet again, and they used the reprieve to launch a sneak attack at night. After defeating the Indians they captured and blinded Prithviraj, ending Hindu dominance over north-western India for the next 700 years.

Battling the British the wrong way

It can rightly be said about the British that they lost every battle in India except the last one. Their wars with the major Indian kingdoms such as the Marathas and Sikhs comprised three wars. The British would invariably lose the first two because of superior Indian bravery, numbers and tactics. The British would sue for peace when facing ruin.

J.C. Stadler. Battle of Assaye (1815)J.C. Stadler. Battle of Assaye (1815)

After each war the British would do the following: One, try and divide the Indian commanders. Two, bribe key generals to stay out of the next battle. Three, learn the weaknesses of the Indian armies. Four, acquire fresh troops from England and Scotland. Five, reverse engineer captured Indian weapons and return with new improved versions to use against Indian armies.

Like dominoes, the Indian kingdoms fell one by one. Alliances rarely lasted. Nobody except the Marathas thought fit to build a navy. Even the Maratha navy, which was undefeated by the Dutch, British, Portuguese and French, fell victim to the machinations of the Marathas commanders who feared the rise of a competing navy.

No forward policy

Examining just these three case studies, one gets the picture that Indian armies rarely if ever chased the enemy back into his territory. It is clear that Indians are brilliant in battle and irresponsible at war.

Despite five centuries of invasions (from around 638 CE to 1191 CE which resulted in huge casualties and enslavements of hundreds of thousands of Indians) no expeditionary army was assembled by a coalition of kingdoms to strike at the enemy in his nest. Had India conducted pre-emptive raids into Central Asia and Persia, these bordering regions would have never have become launch pads for invasions.

Well-known lawyer and former Law Minister Ram Jethmalani writes about this lack of forward policy among Indians. About the invasion of Sindh, which again is a stark example of a victorious Indian kingdom refusing to the eradicate the enemy before he came dangerously close, Jethmalani says that after Sindh finally fell to the Arabs in 711 CE and despite the horrendous destruction that ensued, the Indian kingdoms to the east did not come together to free their Sindhi brethren:

“Rest of the Indians across the borders of Sindh were doubtless aware of the Arab conquest. It produced not a ripple on the quiet waters of their placid existence. Life went on as usual. There was neither a sense of territorial loss, nor an understanding of the nature of the new menace. The conquest of Sindh was dismissed as one more dacoity. Nearly 500 years elapsed before Mohammed Ghori and his marauding hordes descended on India in 1192 A.D. The whole of northern India was made a tributary to the Ghor Dynasty. Muslim power in India had come to stay. Five centuries went by, but the country did not wake up or prepare to do or die. It is a shameful and tragic tale.”

Jethmalani explains the causes of this inertia: “Afflicted by a debilitating pacifism, corroded by the idea of nonviolence, Indians seemed to have left it to professional soldiers to fight the invaders. The rest of the people lifted not one finger to defend their homeland. Invaders who thirsted for the tremendous wealth of India and its delicate and beautiful women never met the resistance that the nation could have generated. The only strong resistance that was offered came from the proud Rajputs, the descendants of the invading Huns of the earlier days. But even this heroic resistance proved temporary and collapsed by reason of internecine rivalry – a perennial disease of Hindu India, ancient and modern.”

Russian way: Making them eat horsemeat

From the defeat of the dreaded Mongols to Alexander Nevsky’s “Massacre on Ice” of the Swedes, there are numerous instances of Russian overthrow of the foreign yoke. But let’s look at more recent victories.

Following the rejection of his Continental System by Tsar Alexander I, French Emperor Napoleon ordered his Grande Armee into Russia. This enormous army numbered 680,000 soldiers, half of them French and the other half comprising Germans, Poles and several other nationalities of the French Empire.

As Napoleon was a brilliant commander and a genius strategist, the Russian generals knew that in a head-on clash the superior Grand Armee would simply roll over the less experienced Russian army. The Russians therefore resorted to “strategic retreat”.

Adolph Northen. Napoleon's retreat from MoscowAdolph Northen. Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow

After a few minor defeats on the border, the Russian army fell back while the Cossacks were given the task of burning villages, towns and crops. This scorched-earth policy was intended to deny the invaders the option of living off the land. Starvation and privation compelled French soldiers to leave their camps at night in search of food. These men became easy targets for roving bands of Cossacks.

The Russian army retreated into the vast country for almost three months before agreeing to fight one of history’s most indecisive battles. The Battle of Borodino, which took place west of Moscow, was a Pyrrhic victory for the French as they lost 49 irreplaceable generals and tens of thousands of soldiers, although the Russians lost more men.

As the Russian army resumed its old tactic of strategic retreat, the French entered Moscow only to see the Russians had abandoned their spiritual capital after setting fire to it. It left Napoleon with only one option.

The French retreat was anything but orderly. It became disastrous when a cleverly timed Russian attack forced the Grand Armee to veer into the corridor stripped of food by both armies. It suffered continual harassment from the Cossacks, peasants and a merciless Russian army.

The fording of rivers became an especially hazardous activity for Napoleon’s troops as Russian forces would converge on them during these crossings. Thousands died due to cold and hunger. It is said only 27,000 soldiers were still standing when the once mighty Grand Armee re-entered France. Of these, only 16,000 would ever fight again.

During their retreat, the French cavalry had ceased to exist because horses had become food. When General Kutuzov had taken command of the Russian army during the middle of the war, he had promised Russia: “I made the Turks eat horsemeat. Give me some time, and the French shall too! Take my word for it, I’ll make them eat horsemeat!”

Hitler’s fatal mistake

A hundred and twenty nine years later, German Chancellor Adolf Hitler decided he would succeed where Napoleon couldn’t. In 1941 he invaded Russia with a German Army in excess of 3.8 million battle hardened troops. After suffering heavy early losses, the Russians counterattacked, ending Hitler’s dream of global domination.

From 1941 to the end of World War II in May 1945, the Germans lost 5,318,000 soldiers. Of these, 80 per cent died on the Russian front. Around three million German prisoners of war (POWs) were captured by Russia. The POWs were marched through the streets of Moscow, Kiev and other Soviet cities. This treatment not only broke the spirits of these soldiers but also satisfied the local population which was thirsting for revenge at the wanton death and destruction caused by the invaders. These POWs were employed as forced labour in the Soviet wartime economy and post war reconstruction.

Depending on which side you believe, between 350,000 and one million German Army POWs died in NKVD camps. According to Russian historian Grigori F. Krivosheev, 2,733,739 German POWs taken and 381,067 died in captivity. British historian Richard Overy estimates 356,000 out of 2,880,000 German prisoners of war died in labour camps. For instance, of the 91,000 soldiers of the Sixth Army that surrendered after the Battle of Stalingrad, only 6,000 of them lived to be repatriated after the war.

A wounded German POW taken at the Battle of Stalingrad.A wounded German POW taken at the Battle of Stalingrad.

Did these POWs deserve better treatment? Why don’t you decide. Of the 5,000,000 Soviet soldiers captured by the German armies, the majority did not make it home. The Nazis deliberately starved 3.1 million of the prisoners to death.

When the Red Army soldiers liberated their territories, they were overcome with rage at seeing their once beautiful country turned into a wasteland. As many as 1700 towns and 70,000 villages had been razed. As many 16 million Soviet civilians were killed in addition to the 10 million who died in uniform. The scale of barbarity of the Germans is unparalleled in modern history.

In order to make Germany pay, Stalin took its eastern half and turned it into a communist state. According to historian David Glantz, he created a system of buffer and client states which included Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia to insulate Russia from any possible future attack. Russia’s action ensured that Germany would never be a threat to Europe.

Inexplicable tolerance

Compare Stalin’s strong actions with how India treated the 97,000 Pakistan Army soldiers captured during the 1971 war. These soldiers had surpassed the Nazis in killing efficiency. While it took the Germans 12 years to murder six million Jews, the Pakistan Army killed three million of its own Bengali citizens in just eight months. And yet when the Indian Army liberated Bangladesh, not one of these war criminals was brought to trial.

On the contrary, they were housed, fed and protected from the anger of the Bengali people. This BBC clip shows 25,000 Pakistani soldiers in Dhaka being “guarded from possible Bengali vengeance by the men with whom less than a fortnight ago they were at war”.

Instead of being held accountable for their crimes before Bangladeshi tribunals, the Pakistani soldiers were transported in heavily guarded trains to India. “At every step they were protected by Indian soldiers had it proved necessary. The Bengalis are not pleased to see their enemies go home apparently scot free.”

India’s top commander Sam Maneckshaw personally visited these POWs, enquiring about their welfare and comfort. When one of them hesitated to shake hands, saying he was a humble toilet cleaner, Manekshaw replied, “We are both soldiers,” and grabbed the Pakistani soldier’s hand.

The Indian political leadership committed a huge strategic blunder by letting the enemy off the hook without extracting a price. That 97,000 Pakistani troops were languishing in India was a huge dent to its pride. It was the opportune time to settle the Kashmir issue in India’s favour. Just like Stalin fixed post-war European boundaries in favour of Russia, Poland and Czechoslovakia at Germany’s expense, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi should have told Pakistan to surrender all claims to Kashmir.

Instead, not only were the POWs allowed to return home on vague assurances of peace by Pakistani Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto, but 58 Indian soldiers believed to be in Pakistani POW camps were not repatriated. Islamabad, however, refuses to acknowledge these Indian soldiers were ever lodged in its jails.

War is a dirty business. One way to prevent it is to let your enemies know you will make them pay a heavy price for it. Soft targets lead to 1965, 1971, Kargil, Mumbai, Uri, Pathankot. The list will go on as long as India shows the other cheek.


HEADLINES PRINT MEDIA NEWS :::::06 OCT 2017

ADVANCING NATIONAL CAUSES ARE FINE BUT THE ARMED FORCES’ PRIMARY MISSION IS TO SAFEGUARD THE NATION. BY LT GEN H S PANAG 

CLEARING GARBAGE IS NOT THE JOB OF ARMY BY LT-GEN HARWANT SINGH (RETD)

NOT IN A FAUJI’S NAME….BY BRIG GURINDER SINGH (RETD)

IAF: READY FOR TWO-FRONT WAR CHIEF: CAPABLE OF STRIKING PAK TARGETS

IAF CHIEF WARNS PAK: CAN LOCATE, FIX, STRIKE TARGETS

PLA widens road near Doklam, no strategic impact says India

500 CHINESE SOLDIERS PRESENT WHERE ROAD BEING BUIL

PAK WARNS INDIA AGAINST SURGICAL STRIKES ON ITS SOIL

AKHNOOR: TERROR STRIKE AVERTED

CHINA MAINTAINING SIZEABLE TROOPS NEAR DOKALAM: SOURCES

SLUGGISHNESS IN ECONOMY PM’S MID-COURSE CORRECTION

Democracy, ‘darr’ can’t go together, says defiant Sinha

NO PROTESTS AT JANTAR MANTAR FROM NOW: NGT


Major killed, 3 hurt as BMW car hits tree

Major killed, 3 hurt as BMW car hits tree
The mangled remains of the car.

Tribune News Service

Jammu, October 4

A Major was killed and three others were injured when the BMW car they were travelling in met with an accident at Akhnoor at about 3.30 am today.The police said four Army personnel were travelling in the BMW car (UK06B-9000) when it hit a tree at the Thati area on the Jammu-Poonch highway, resulting in death of one passenger.“In preliminary investigation, it looks like the vehicle went out of control as it was being driven at a high speed. It hit the tree, resulting in death of one person,” Munish Kumar, SDPO, Akhnoor, said.The deceased has been identified as Major Ashish Tawari of the 10th Division of the Army. His body was shifted to the Military Hospital, Akhnoor. The three injured persons have been identified as Colonel BK Jha, Majors Mandeep Singh and Sandeep Singh. All have been taken to the Military Hospital, Satwari, where their condition was said to be stable.An FIR regarding the accident has been registered at the Akhnoor police station.