Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

…and the faujis are angry by Col Dabby S De mello (Retd)

Ex-servicemen are engulfed by a smouldering disconnect following the inept handling of the OROP issue by the government. In their sunset years, they are being made to feel as if they are a spent force.

...and the faujis are angry
Veteran servicemen at a protest seeking OROP in New Delhi. PTI

Col Dabby S De mello (Retd)In times of war and not before,
God and soldier we adore.
But in times of peace and all things righted,
God is forgotten and the soldier slighted.

—Rudyard KiplingManohar Parrikar apparently is an ardent fan of the legendry poet Rudyard Kipling. Within a month of his swearing in as Raksha Mantri, he has revealed to the country that the nation no more holds the defence services in high esteem. His reason: “These days, people don’t look up to the military in high esteem since there has been no war for so many years.”True, there has been no general war, but just count the horrendous losses suffered in the interim years, battling an insurgency and terrorism, largely the creation of the failed political ideologies, and at times open support to anti-nationals. Coming, therefore, from a Raksha Mantri whose mandate is to uphold the morale of the three services, this statement was most shocking. Parrikar is neither rustic nor illiterate. Nobody becomes an IITian with limited knowledge. All the more reason his disparaging remarks are repugnant. But by saying so, did he bare his party’s mindset towards the faujis or that of the collective conscience of the Indians  as a whole? The revelation, true or false, by  the Raksha Mantri, spoke volumes about the way Defence Services will be treated by the NDA (read BJP). The entire defence fraternity was shocked and felt angry.September 15, 2013, remains a sad day for the exservicemen (ESM) for, on that day, they got carried away by the rhetoric and honeyed words of Narendra Modi, the NDA’s prime-ministerial candidate, during the ESM rally at Rewari. Having seen their stock lowered by the earlier governments, they, rightly or wrongly, allowed themselves to be considered a vote bank by the BJP, a decision they now regret. In his election bhashan, Modi promised to honour the long-pending demand of One Rank One Pension (OROP) in its entirety and true essence, if NDA was voted to power. That it was voted to power with an unexpected majority was also due to the faujis voting en bloc for the BJP, a fact it  should remember. Faujis, for whom an oral commitment is sacrosanct, felt utterly cheated and decided to take an unprecedented step — peacefully protest throughout the country with Jantar Mantar as the pivot. To press home their rightful demands, the ESM, mostly in their twilight years, have been sitting on a relay hunger strike on a footpath near Jantar Mantar non-stop for more than two years. How disgracefully can the government and its leaders behave with the faujis is a new and bitter experience for a disciplined force. And they are angry. 

ESM’s Tiananmen moment

Early morning of August 14, 2015, was the ESM’s Tiananmen moment, when the might of the state pitted itself against peaceful demonstrators; young policemen were allowed to manhandle grey-haired retired soldiers (many of them war-decorated ones) and widows engaged in a peaceful and permitted protest near Jantar Mantar. No one from the government apologised for this shameful behaviour. The faujis have not forgotten that day, and are angry.To break the protest movement, the government even attempted to create an officer-jawan divide by maliciously goading another set of retired jawans to set up an alternate OROP stage a few feet away from the main protest tent at Jantar Mantar. From there, the misguided jawans denounced their officers by reading out the script handed out to them; what sort of government is this that uses such lowdown methods against its own veterans? Fortunately, this misguided lot soon realised its folly and joined the main protest, but the collateral damage it did to the strong officer-man bond which sustains our military, is frightening; a damage which can seriously impair the fighting abilities of our defence forces. The entire fauji fraternity took no time to fathom the design of the establishment and is angry.  Finding far too many anomalies, some very serious, in the notification issued on OROP, the ESM rejected it outright and conveyed it in no uncertain terms to the government. To address the anomalies, the government on December 14, 2015 constituted a one-man judicial committee comprising a retired chief justice and asked for his recommendations within six months, a job which could be done within a month. After five months, the government maliciously extended its term by six months, apparently to tire out the protesting ESM.  The honourable judge finally submitted his report on October 26, 2016, but more than nine months later, the report has not been made public. Maybe the judge was convinced about the genuineness of OROP demands and has recommended in favour of the ESM. If that be so, implementation of his   recommendations can be a win-win situation for the government as well as for ESM. But the govt hasn’t budged from its hardened stand and as a result, the faujis are angry.

Babus vs faujis

The establishment continues to pit the bureaucracy against the defence services, resulting in systematic degradation of the services. An  undesirable and unhealthy civil-military equation exists today.  The faujis are not oblivious to the step-brotherly treatment meted out to them vis-a-vis the bureaucrats and are very angry.Due to the inept handling of the OROP issue, and indifferent attitude of the establishment on many other matters, including the warrant of precedence, a smouldering disconnect has engulfed these men who once were sentinels of our borders during their prime years, but are now considered a dispensable and a spent force. Their collective protest has been on for 27 months, but none from the establishment has bothered to discuss a way out with them. The faujis have started feeling that they are being treated unfairly and are angry. By now, the Pradhan Sevak knows too well that the one-time raise given to the military pensioners is not the OROP approved by the two parliamentary committees; yet he mocks the ESM by repeatedly misinforming the countrymen from just about any platform, “Hamari govt ne fauji bhaiyon ko ek rank-ek pension de di hai!” What an emotional assault on the naïve veterans! No fauji, whether in or out of uniform, remains emotionally unmolested by the government’s highhandedness and indifference, and is angry.There are more counts on which the faujis are angry, the manifestations of which have not gone unnoticed by the BJP thinktank. Their appeasement has commenced and is gathering momentum to bring them back, yet again in good humour. But there is a saying that you cannot fool everyone all the time. The vote bank it created in 2013, and successfully milked in 2014, can’t be left unamused. 2019 is not far and 4.91 crore voters make a formidable electorate. All media is put in high gear to woo the ESM by cosmetic gestures. Courtesy the BJP, faujis are no more apolitical or gullible as in 2014. They know their vote will make a difference, like it did in 2014. The faujis are angry and not without reason. Let us not forget that this patriotic lot of Indians also includes the soldiers in uniform guarding the borders in most adverse conditions. Populist measures of the state to keep their morale to the optimum will never be enough. The cumulative anger of these forgotten soldiers needs to be addressed the soonest in national interest. In military parlance, it is the captain of the ship that must bear responsibility for the errors of his command, no matter who lower in the chain, may have been responsible. Whether by design or by default (heeding to biased advice from biased advisers), whatever, the Pradhan Sevak is responsible for the current state of affairs. PS. Let the statesmanship prevail over ego and faujis be also taken along in the Sab ka Saath venture. Far too many elections have been won on the name of the fauj, faujis and “surgical strikes”. It’s high time the BJP won their hearts by giving the ESM their rightful due. By staging a countrywide peaceful protest, they are only reminding the Pradhan Sevak to fulfil the promise he made to them at Rewari. Can the BJP risk antagonising this large vote bank, if their promises are not fulfilled? I am not too sure. Jai Hind. Jai Hind ki Sena. JaiHind ki Bhootpoorv Sena. 


Live To Fight Another Day: That Is What The Mutual Withdrawal From Doklam Means by Lt Gen Syed Ata Husnain

Live To Fight Another
Day: That Is What The Mutual Withdrawal From Doklam Means

SNAPSHOT

What should make us all happy is that the Prime Minister is going to BRICS Summit without having to be worried about the borders.

After all it’s always good to live to fight another day; where and how soon, only time will tell.

Authorised media in both India and China has announced that both nations have been in diplomatic engagement, as a result of which there is mutual agreement to disengage troops from the Doklam Plateau. The latter landmark, with which much of the Indian public now appears familiar, lies at the eastern edge of the Chumbi Valley and is a territory belonging to Bhutan.

In June this year, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) decided to construct a road through the plateau, which it claims as its legitimate territory, to bring its logistics reach nearer the Indian post of Doka La near the tri-junction, where the boundaries of India, Bhutan and China meet. By doing this the PLA was in effect also improving its operational and logistics capability to threaten India’s highly strategic and vulnerable sliver of territory called the Siliguri Corridor. This corridor provides India the only land access to its seven north eastern states. The PLA activated this front after an interval of time through this road construction.

However, Indian troops crossed over to Bhutanese territory and prevented further construction of the road. A 72-day standoff ensued which has had both countries and much of the international community on tenterhooks. It was a strange military standoff, where both sides maintained their balance, did not resort to any physical shootouts and apart for the initial jostling between the troops (and on India’s Independence Day a more serious exchange of stones, sticks and fisticuffs in a different area) only continued to attempt staring each other down. That was on until the announcement on 28 August 2017 that mutual disengagement had been agreed upon.

A few more issues of the background may be relevant for full public comprehension. This standoff was not anywhere on the un-demarcated Line of Actual Control (LAC) of which perceptions differ and which leads to transgressions into each other’s perceived territory. This was on a third country’s territory and India has the 2007 agreement with Bhutan for mutual assistance in the event of threats to each other’s security.

The PLA has gradually increased its activities of transgression over the last 15 years or a little more. There have been standoffs in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh too, but none have had this kind of vitriolic backing of crude psychological warfare through the instrument of the official media in China; both Global Times and People’s Daily carried typical government drafted messages without any subtlety and Chinese television channels included commentaries by some analysts in terrible English. That the standoff has ended is a reflection of maturity on part of the two countries despite the fact that China had made it clear that there was no way its troops would leave the Doklam area.

It has happened before the BRICS Summit coming up early next month in the Chinese city of Xiamen, where Chinese President Xi Jinping will play host to the important club of middle powers. One of the reasons for the mutual disengagement appears to be the potential embarrassment to Xi Jinping in his stewardship of the summit. That obviously is the whole reason. I did appreciate that the standoff would probably continue at lower level of displayed energy right through to the 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party where Xi Jinping’s future power and status will be decided.

Quite obviously, the PLA’s gambit had not worked and although it adopted the concept of war under ‘informationised’ conditions over two decades ago, its crude handling of psychological warfare proved ineffective. If anything, it hardened India’s resolve to risk what may be called ‘sticking it out’.

The standoff moved through some interesting strategic moments. While China expected India to withdraw forthwith due to a perception of the latter’s supposed weak military disposition, it did not have a ‘Plan B’ ready that would cater for the eventuality of India deciding to stick it out. Fresh from its perceived strategic success in the South China Sea, and after defying the ruling of the international tribunal, China possibly felt it could ride rough shod over India. It hoped to appropriately send India a message by embarrassing it in a military confrontation; that message was equally for nations with whom India is in potential league for strategic partnerships, Japan in particular.

As the standoff progressed into a long stalemate, the advantage appeared to shift to India creating a situation, where a mutual disengagement through diplomatic negotiation would end to India’s moral advantage. The inability of an adversary to achieve its strategic aim is long considered a victory by the other side. However, care needs to be taken not to call this disengagement a victory for India.

The term ‘victory in conflict’ (and the conflict spectrum does classify this standoff as a conflict) is one of the most debated terminologies in military parlance. The management of victory isn’t the easiest even for the most seasoned diplomatic corps or military because it has negative spinoffs which can hardly be perceived immediately. Thus the situation may well be termed as ‘advantage India’ without spelling out the domain, diplomatic or military. While many may contest this and hawks would like to project victory for various reasons, they need to be cautioned because this is not the end of Sino-Indian confrontation. The likelihood of needling and triggering similar or near similar situations through ‘walk-ins’ across the LAC in other areas such as Ladakh, Barahoti and Arunachal Pradesh, would remain live.

India’s strategic analysts must not be drawn into the victory defining game and would do much more justice if they pressurised the government to ensure that the long-pending and slowly-progressing border infrastructure is hastened as much as the acquisition of hardware and ammunition for which sizeable recent financial allocations have been made. It must not return to business as usual in these crucial fields. What is even more important is not to be led away to believe that only quiet diplomacy succeeds.

In future situations, the possibility of the intense need for a developed and well thought through communication strategy may be a virtual compulsion. How is this to be done and which body, institution or organisation has the professional expertise to undertake this is a question mark. This time China did not use its force multipliers such as cyber warfare but possibly tested some models in the live environment. The next time this will be a crucial domain and India must step up its expertise in this through a combination of military cyber and information capability, largely manned through civilian intake. That will deliver permanence and specialisation at the cutting edge, while uniformed personnel can lend it a military orientation.

One of the earliest analyses of the Doklam standoff done by me suggested a line that China would keep India engaged at the land boundaries through unresolved border disputes and frequent standoffs. The purpose of these operations would be to lend weight to India’s obsession with continental security. The urgency with which India needs to ramp up its maritime capability cannot be over emphasised. That will have China worried especially if strategic partnerships with the US, Japan, Australia, Vietnam and South Korea are established in the maritime domain, and Malabar-type exercises get progressively enhanced in scope. After all, as they say, China is still a landlocked country; its access to the Pacific does not give it the advantage it seeks. It is the Indian Ocean that it looks at. The Indian Ocean has a distinct Indian advantage and China’s worries about its energy security and trade stem from that.

At the end of the day what should make us all happy is that the Prime Minister is going to BRICS without having to be worried about the borders. After all it’s always good to live to fight another day; where and how soon, only time will tell.


Marshal of Indian Air Force Arjan Singh passes away in New Delhi at 98

Marshal of Indian Air Force Arjan Singh passes away in New Delhi at 98
Marshal of IAF Arjan Singh. File photo

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 16

Marshal of the Indian Air Force Arjan Singh passed away at the Army Research and Referral Hospital here on Saturday, according to the reliable sources. However, an official confirmation still awaited.He was 98. He was promoted to the five-star rank in 2002.

Arjan Singh is the only officer of the Indian Air Force to be promoted to five-star rank, equal to a Field Marshal, to which he was promoted in 2002.

He was Chief of the Air Staff (CAS) from August 1, 1964 to July 15, 1969, and was awarded the Padma Vibhushan in 1965.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

He became the first Air Chief Marshal of the Indian Air Force to be upgraded to the position of Air Chief Marshal from the rank of Chief of the Air Staff in recognition of his Air Force’s contribution in the 1965 war.He took retirement from services in 1970 at the age of 50.In 1971, he was appointed as the Indian Ambassador to Switzerland. He concurrently served as the Ambassador to the Vatican.


DC was left to fend for herself Injured young officer pressed Army into action to avoid Jat stir repeat

DC was left to fend for herself
DC Gauri Parasher Joshi surrounded by security personnel in Panchkula on Friday. TRIBUNE PHOTO: RAVI KUMAR

Nitin Jain

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 26

It could have been a repeat of the unprecedented Jat agitation violence that had rocked Haryana in February 2016, if Deputy Commissioner Gauri Parasher Joshi had not pressed the Army into action when violence and arson reigned supreme in Panchkula on Friday.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)After being outnumbered by the thousands of rampaging dera followers, the local police had fled the spot, leaving the young officer to almost fend for herself.It was her experience of having served in the Naxal-affected district of Kalahandi in Odisha that helped the 2009-batch IAS officer from Odisha cadre, who is on deputation to Haryana, not only to save her life but also to save the situation from totally slipping out of control.The Panchkula violence and arson left at least 32 dead and more than 250 persons injured, besides damaging property worth crores of rupees.As the mob turned violent on hearing the news of the conviction of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, the 36-year-old District Magistrate faced stone-throwing by the rampaging dera followers, who had swarmed Panchkula for the past couple of days, for some time by herself, as the police force beat a hasty retreat (read fled the spot).During the ensuing violence and arson, this mother of an 11-month-old suffered injuries and even her clothes got torn. Left alone with a single PSO, she then decided to go to her office and issue an order to hand over the situation to the Army, which helped avoid further deterioration of the situation.In the chaotic situation, she again returned to the field. “It was the concern for the city, which was on the boil, that remained uppermost in my mind,” said the bureaucrat.On Saturday, Gauri reached home at 3 am but not before going around every nook and corner of the city and seeing for herself that the situation had been brought under control after dispersing the rioters. After spending a few hours, she left again for the field.During the violence on Friday, the injured DC continued to boost the morale of the district machinery. “When I reached home in the wee hours, the family was shocked to see my blood-soaked clothes,” shared the journalist-turned-bureaucrat, an English Literature postgraduate from Delhi’s St Stephen’s College.“She, however, still refused to go to hospital, saying that the hospital resources were too stretched and did not want to dislocate their work for her relatively less serious injury,” recalled her 2003-batch IAS officer husband Ajit Balaji Joshi, who is the Deputy Commissioner in Chandigarh.


Sirsa DC orders attachment of Dera’s assets

Sushil Manav

Tribune News Service

Sirsa, August 27

Deputy Commissioner Prabhjot Singh on Sunday ordered assets of Dera Sacha Sauda to be attached, following the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Friday order.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

The high court had ordered the sect to pay for the losses of property caused by its followers after its head Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh was found guilty of rape on Friday.

Thirty-six people died and hundreds were injured in clashes that broke out after Singh was held guilty of sexually assaulting two female followers in 2002.

A court will announce Singh’s sentence on Monday.


27 yrs on, retired colonel gets 5-yr jail in disproportionate assets case

CHANDIGARH: Twenty-seven years after a retired colonel was booked for corruption, a special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court awarded five years jail to him on Tuesday.

Colonel BS Goraya (retired), 75, has been held guilty under Sections 13(1) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The CBI court has also imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh on him, for acquiring properties disproportionate to his assets. It was among the oldest cases at the Chandigarh district courts.

“Being a senior army officer, he was having a responsibility to keep a watch over the conduct of his subordinates,” stated the judgment. “Instead of becoming a role model for society and bring pride for the nation, he grossly misused his high position and committed criminal misconduct to accumulate huge wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income by illegal means.”

Between January 1, 1987, and August 8, 1990, Goraya, a Sector-9 resident, and some of his family members — wife Parveen Goraya, daughter Manveen Goraya and one Guninder Singh — acquired properties valued at ₹82.6 lakh. Of these, they could not account for properties worth ₹72.7 lakh, the CBI had claimed. However, while pronouncing the order, the court of Gaganjeet Kaur said assets worth ₹66.94 lakh were disproportionate to his known sources of income.

A case was registered against the Colonel General Staff (engineer headquarters, Western Command) in August 1990.

During the hearing on Tuesday, Goraya pleaded for leniency in sentence, stating that he was 75. He said his wife was 72 and a heart and diabetes patient, hence dependant on him.

In February this year, the court of chief judicial magistrate (CJM) Akshdeep Mahajan had sentenced Goraya to two-year rigorous imprisonment for selling his agricultural property that had been attached in Punjab.

The CBI had also pointed that Goraya had not paid any property returns, except in 1987, after joining the army. In March this year, the HC dismissed Goraya’s plea challenging the trial court decision of not allowing examination of additional witnesses.

Senior public prosecutor Pawan Dogra and public prosecutor KP Singh represented the CBI.

The defence plans to move the high court as early as this week.

UNEXPECTED, SAY KIN

Goraya’s family members, including his daughters, son and grandson, were present in court the entire day. The former army officer,who was seen lifting his family’s spirits before the quantum was pronounced, looked equally grim after the order.

Disturbed by what they called “unexpected”, family members were seen consoling each other as Goraya requested cops to let him talk to his daughter in private.

A LONG DELAY

The FIR was registered on August 6, 1990, post which Col Goraya was put under suspension on August 17,1990, and dismissed from service on March 19, 1993

The challan in the corruption case was filed by the CBI in 1993, as the inquiry was pending all this while

The cross-examination and recording of evidence by investigating officer Makhan Singh alone took seven years. It was carried out through video-conferencing from the PGIMER as Col Goraya developed a serious heart ailment The defence got seven months to present witnesses

According to defence counsel SPS Bhullar, who especially summoned the senior superintendent of police (SSP) when the case was registered, SSP Negi did not give clear answers during cross-examination. He stated he didn’t remember most of the facts during the investigation

The retired colonel didn’t engage a lawyer initially and was “forced” to appear in person. He deposed in court on Tuesday that only towards the “fag end of the case, was he able to engage a lawyer”

As per judgment, the convict stated that he appeared in different courts (including high court and Supreme Court) over “500 times” and never sought a single adjournment or missed any hearing


Ration for defence officers, a matter of dignity, pride & honour. It shouldn’t be stopped

Ration for defence officers doesn’t just mean bread and butter. It is considered to be a dignified privilege given to the soldiers who have dedicated their lives to the motherland, irrespective of the field or the peace area . It is a matter of dignity , pride and honour of an soldier. No amount of money can substitute it. Stopping  ration is a disrespectful move and demoralizing the armed forces. Any amount of money in lieu of ration is  against the ethics and ethos of a defense personal.

Please sign my petition to show your respect for the defence personals.

RATION SHOULD BE CONTINUED FOR ALL THE DEFENSE PERSONALS.

JAI HIND!!!


OUTPOURING OF A VETERAN.

Respected Veterans,

Jai Hind.

  1. While I greatly appreciate Gen SG Vombatkere being an intrepid crusader with indomitable spirit, zeal & enthusiasm in fighting for the poor, the underprivileged & the down-trodden, the Question is: Who cares? Do his articles really make a difference? NO. Sad, but that is the truth. To the middle class, and that includes you & me, it hardly matters as to what happens to others. Tomorrow, if I am mugged and killed in broad daylight, will it make a difference? NO. Not even a handful of Veterans would attend my cremation. We, Bharathvasis are a bigoted lot; especially Ex-Servicemen, ably led by retired Officers.
  2. There are over 4000 retired Officers of the Army, Navy & Air Force at Bangalore; and how many of them show up at the National Military Memorial on Kargil Diwas (26 July) and Vijay Diwas (16 Dec) to pay Homage to their brethren? Hardly, 25-30 of them. What about others? Don’t ask me as to what they do. All that I know is, there is a galaxy of retired Lt Gen, Air Marshals and Vice Admirals settled down at Bangalore; not to mention officers of the rank of Maj Gen, Rear Admiral and Air Vice Marshal. If I have not mentioned Officers of the rank of Col, Capt (IN) and Gp Capt and below, it is just that they are a whole horde, to whom words like ‘Welfare of Ex-Servicemen’ and ‘Loyalty to your Men, even after retirement’ are mere buzz-words; and they mean nothing to awaken their collective conscience, if they still have one.
  3. And, it is the same WE retired Officers who are in the forefront to ask for anything & everything FREE. WE retired Officers are a selfish and greedy lot. The less said the better; for even a full page would not be enough to recount the ‘virtues’ of retired officers. The very same retired officers who do not find time to attend the Commemoration Ceremonies at the National Military Memorial, Bangalore, are present in hundreds, guzzling chilled beer, bottle after bottle; and voraciously hogging chicken roast and mutton Biryani, when invited for the Veterans Day Lunch at RSI.
  4. WE Bharathvasis, have everything to be proud of: our Culture and our Heritage. But do we really display any pride in ourselves or our Culture & Heritage? NO. WE Bharathvasis, are a corrupt lot. To cheat is part of our DNA. We are cowards. With such sterling qualities in us; I wonder at times: Do WE really have a right to exist as a Nation? Over a period, our collective conscience has become NUMB. 70 children have lost their lives in UP due to negligence by Doctors and the supervisory staff. Does it really bother anyone? NO. Due to inadequate monsoon, acute water shortage and famine in the interiors are staring us. Cattle are going to die in thousands. Who is going to face the brunt? It is village folks all over the Country. Who cares?
  5. When WE talk of ‘izzat’, ‘honour & dignity’ I find these words sound hollow and are mere rhetoric. When we talk of ‘Welfare of Ex-Servicemen & their families’; it means nothing. It is just lip service. Starting with the Chiefs; and, Mil Fmn Cdrs down the chain, they have absolutely no say in the selection & appointment of retired Officers of the rank of Brig/Col as Director Sainik Welfare in various states; and retired officers of the rank of Lt Col as Dy Directors at the District level. Just to cite an example: The Dircector Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement in Kerala is a retired Sergeant. How did a Sergeant get appointed against a post meant for a retired Brig? Simple. He got appointed when ‘Saint’ Antony was the Defence Minister. And mind you, not one incl the Mil Fmn Cdr concerned raised his voice saying that such an appointment is highly irregular and unacceptable. As I said earlier, when it comes to Welfare of Ex-Servicemen, who cares?
  6. I do not know as to what happens to Officers after their retirement? Just two examples of past Directors Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement, Karnataka. The first, a Brigadier. During his tenure he got a few plots of land from the BDA under the pretext of allotting them to Kargil Widows. Very noble thought. And he was equally noble in his action! On being made available plots of land by the BDA, he promptly allotted two plots to his Mother-in-Law, who I am told is mother of a Lt Gen, who retired as the Dy COAS. And a few more such illegal allotments. A few years down the line, the Brigadier’s misdemeanor comes to light. An FIR is filed by the Police. The Brig goes to the Court and has the FIR quashed on technical grounds!! Que-serai-serai.
  7. Directorates of Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement in all States are sitting on huge piles of cash by way of Fixed Deposits of Flag Day Fund to the tune of hundreds of crores. Amounts can be invested by Govt Depts as Fixed Deposits only in SBI or in other Public Sector Banks and NOT in Private Banks. Yet, a Director Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement had invested over Rs. 28 crores of Flag Day Funds with numerous Private Banks at different rates of interest, in clear contravention to Govt orders on the subject. Any action taken against the Officer, even after the misdemeanor came to light and brought to the notice of the Govt and the local Military Formation? NONE. Que-serai-serai.
  8. In case we are serious about Welfare & Re-settlement of Ex-Servicemen & their families, we need to have serving Officers of the Rank of Brig posted as Director Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement, in all States. When we can have officers of the rank of Maj Gen/Brig as Addl/Dy DG NCC in all States, then why can’t we have serving Officers of the rank of Brig posted as Director Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement, in all States? NCC no doubt is important; but to my mind, far more important is Welfare & Re-settlement of Ex-Servicemen & their families. Veteran Lt Gen SK Bahri and I had met the then Vice COAS in his office in April 2013, in this regard; and, impressed on him the urgent & inescapable of requirement of having serving Officers of the Rank of Brig posted as Director Sainik Welfare & Re-settlement, in all States. But who cares?
  9. I must however say that, there are a few refreshing exceptions. One such is Lt Gen RK Anand, GOC Dakshin Bharath Area, Chennai. He has designated all Officers incharge of CSD Canteens, all over the five southern states, as ‘Executive Director Veterans Welfare’; with instructions that they will attend to all problems concerning welfare of Ex-Servicemen & their families. Not only that, he has instituted a Report to be submitted to him, every Monday morning, as to the number of cases handled by each Executive Director during the preceding week, with details thereof.
  10. To take interest or take part in Politics after retirement, is my fundamental Right. And one should not shy away from Politics under the misplaced notion that Military Veterans should remain apolitical.
  11. Let us NOT be blind to happenings around us. We Veterans, as Citizens have a duty to perform, in raising our voice and protest against any wrong doing by the Govt or the society at large.
  12. By criticizing our Hon’ble PM or the BJP we DO NOT become lackeys of the Congress Party or Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi; or, we end up condoning corruption by Lalu Yadhav & his ilk. If General Elections are held tomorrow, I have no hesitation in stating that I shall be voting for MODI once again; for want of a better option. I voted for MODI with a lot of hope.
  13. It is time for Veterans to think and ponder as to whether we should be mute spectators to the happening around us; or, stand up for what is right and raise our voice against any injustice or persecution or display of lethargy & apathy by the Govt.
  14. Let us remember, “Silence is no doubt a Virtue; but, there can be no greater SIN than to remain mute and silent in the face of tyranny or wrong doing by the Govt in power or for that matter, anybody”.
  15. To end, I salute Veterans like Gen SG Vombatkere and Gen PG Kamath for expressing their views, without fear or favour.

Regards,

colRajan

Col Rajan

Bangalore, 9449043770

17 Aug 2017


In I-Day address, Pak PM blames India for impasse Hoists ‘largest’ national flag on 400-ft pole at Attari-Wagah border

In I-Day address, Pak PM blames India for impasse
A Pakistani Ranger (top) on Monday unfurls the national flag at the Wagah border to celebrate the country’s Independence Day. AFP

Islamabad, August 14

Pakistan’s new Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi today blamed India for the impasse in bilateral ties, saying New Delhi’s “expansionist designs” was the “main hurdle” in constructive relations between the two neighbours.Addressing the nation on its 70th Independence Day, Abbasi said Pakistan “desires positive and constructive” relations with all countries based on sovereign equality.Indo-Pak ties nosedived after a series of attacks last year, including the Uri strike, carried out by the Pakistan- based terror outfits. Following the attacks, India boycotted the SAARC Summit, which was scheduled to be held in November last in Pakistan.“Our government has invariably made efforts to initiate the process of meaningful dialogue and adoption of peaceful means to resolve the issues but unfortunately the expansionist designs of India have remained the main hurdle in this regard,” Abbasi said.Pakistan’s national flag today flew at 400 ft, the highest in South Asia, at the Attari-Wagah border with India to mark the country’s 70th Independence Day.The 120×80 ft flag is also the largest in the history of the country, the Pakistani media reported.Pakistan Army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa hoisted the flag near the border after midnight, kicking off the Independence Day celebrations across the country.The flag is said to be the highest in South Asia and the eighth highest in the world.Gen Bajwa said: “Some 77 years ago, Pakistan resolution was passed in the same city (Lahore). Pakistan came into being on the night of 27th Ramadan. Today, the country is progressing on the path of law and constitution. All institutions are working properly. We will make Pakistan the country of Quaid-e-Azam and Allama Iqbal.”He enunciated the many challenges Pakistan faced, but also tried to drum up the nationalistic sentiment.“We have rendered many sacrifices — we will never forget our martyrs. We will execute each and every terrorist in Pakistan. I want to tell our enemies, whether they are in the east or in the west, that your bullets will end but not the chests of our jawans,” he added.“I assure you that we will never let you down. Any power that will aim to weaken Pakistan, the Army and all other institutions will foil their attempts,” he said.Other speakers at the event also paid tributes to those killed during migration to Pakistan. — PTIOur friendship stronger than steel: Wang  Islamabad: Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang, “special guest” at Pakistan’s Independence Day celebration, said on Monday that the two countries have always stood by each other and their friendship was “stronger than steel and sweeter than honey”. Wang, a member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of China’s ruling Communist Party, is among the country’s top leaders. He arrived in Islamabad on Sunday on a two-day visit. AFP


Pakistan hoists ‘largest’ national flag to mark Independence Day

Pakistan hoists ‘largest’ national flag to mark Independence Day
Sweets being exchanged at the Wagah-Attari border. ANI

Lahore, August 14

Pakistan on Monday hoisted a 400-ft-high national flag, the largest in its history, at the Attari-Wagah border with India to mark the country’s Independence Day.Army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa hoisted the flag at the border after Sunday midnight, kicking off the celebrations for the Independence Day across the country.The flag is said to be the highest in South Asia and the eighth highest in the world.Made in Pakistan, it is 400-ft-high and 120 feet by 80 feet in size.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Gen Bajwa said: “Some 77 years ago, a Pakistan resolution was passed in the same city (Lahore). Pakistan came into being on the night of 27th Ramadan–it was a blessed night.“Today, the country is progressing on the path of the law and the Constitution. All institutions are working properly. We will make Pakistan the country of Quaid-e-Azam and Allama Iqbal.”Gen Bajwa enunciated the many challenges Pakistan faced but also tried to drum up the nationalistic sentiment.“We have rendered many sacrifices–we will never forget our martyrs. We will execute each and every terrorist in Pakistan. I want to tell our enemies, whether they are in the east or in the west, that your bullets will end but not the chests of our jawans.”“I assure you that we will never let you down. Any power that will aim to weaken Pakistan, the Army and all other institutions will foil their attempts.”Other speakers at the event also paid tributes to those killed during the migration to Pakistan. PTI