Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

*KAR CHALE HUM FIDA*…..

Image result for Maj Shaitan Singh Bhati
Today 18 Nov is commemorated by (some in) India as Rezangla Day, in memory of one of the *most stirring battles ever fought*. Last man last bullet is spoken of often but happens ever so rarely. Indian history has Saragarhi and Rezangla among its most well-known. While the former fought in 1897 for the British Indian Army is, perhaps, more remembered because the Brits recognized and spread word about it, the *latter was fought more recently in 1962 against the Chinese, for Independent India, but, alas, remains largely unknown* outside military circles.
http://

Almost the entire lot of people at the post viz. *114 soldiers (of the 120), of the Charlie company of 13th battalion of the Kumaon regiment, died defending Rezangla hill* about 20 km SE of Chushul, Ladakh at a height of 16500 feet and *repulsed the Chinese attack in this sector*. In the dark and depressing overall scenario of the 1962 war (notwithstanding supreme acts of bravery by individuals and units displayed at many places like that by its sister battalion the 6 Kumaon at Walong in the North East or by Jaswant Singh of 4th Garhwal Rifles at Nauranang, in Tawang, whose anniversary was yesterday. 17 Nov) Rezangla was the bright spot that showed the Chinese (and the World) that India was not the pushover they had imagined.
Details of the battle can be easily googled. Or if you please, read a brilliant piece by reputed military analyst and scholar Mohan Guruswamy on his Facebook post today. Suffice to just give some details. *120 (some reports say 123 or 124) Indian soldiers without artillery support, with most antiquated weapons against almost 5000 Chinese with artillery support and modern weapons. Icy cold weather, snow all around, oxygen in short supply, howling winds. And a battle on*.
Chinese soldiers kept advancing wave after wave even before the Indian soldiers could replenish their stocks and reload the machine guns, The Company Commander Major Shaitan Singh and his Ahir boys kept firing even though they were under a constant barrage of artillery. There was no hope and no way of replenishing their ammunition.
Major Shaitan Singh had two options: Fight to the last man and last bullet, or Abandon Post. The soldiers were tired and bleeding. But their morale was high. They chose to fight on. *Not a single man abandoned his post. Not a single man fled the battle*.
Almost all the Indian soldiers were killed in action (114 of them died, 6 were captured as POWs, of whom one died in captivity and one escaped back to Leh and recounted the tale) versus about 1300 Chinese who died. When their bodies were found later, in Jan of 1963, *many were clutching the triggers of their guns. They had died fighting until the last bullet*. Many had even resorted to fighting with bare hands after they could not use weapons or ran out of ammunition.
 http://

 A Rajput company commander Maj Shaitan Singh Bhatti from Jodhpur leading 120 Ahirs (Yadavs) from the plains of Haryana, of the 13 Kumaon regiment, laid down their lives in the cold and barren mountains of the Karakoram Range. *This is an inspiring India story for you*. Legend has it that Major Shaitan Singh did not want the Chinese army to take control of his body or mutilate it. He was mortally wounded in combat. *He ordered his jawans to hide his body behind boulders*. One of his buddies unslung his rifle, used the sling to tie Major Shaitan Singh’s body to his and rolled down the hill. As the brave Major Shaitan Singh breathed his last, his body was hidden behind boulders. Pse read the accompanying tweet of Major Gaurav Arya, a retired Kumaon regiment officer and now a well known military analyst seen frequently on TV.
Defence analyst and media person Gaurav Sawant, who recently anchored a TV episode on this war (India Today TV Channel) and who has written on this war himself recounted in his Facebook post last year, of the stories his father, a retired Army Brigadier told them.  “My father told us stories of how one soldier, a wrestler, crushed the heads of two Chinese soldiers with his bare hands, when he ran out of ammunition. Another soldier flung himself on two Chinese soldiers and took them down with him as they climbed towards the peak. All this is a part of the military folklore’.
What caused this *exemplary display of bravery and fortitude in most treacherous weather where breathing itself was difficult*. As Mohan Guruswamy puts it aptly “At this altitude it took hours to bring a kettle to boil for tea and whatever fruit and vegetables that came were frozen hard”. And let us not forget that 13 Kumaon was not even acclimatized having been *deployed in Chushul on 24 Oct* in the lull of the Indo China war. *Less than a month later* they were in the middle of a no holds barred battle. To quote Gaurav “The epic battle of Rezang La is the story of unparalleled valour, raw courage and victory buried in the crushing defeat in 1962’. Let us leave it to the management schools and other analysts to make sense of this. Let us simply today celebrate the strategic message they sent out.
On 18 Nov in this battle *seven waves of Chinese attacks were repulsed*. On Nov 21, barely 3 days later the war came to a halt. Surely the Chinese would have imbibed the lessons of Rezangla. If they came in again they would do so at their own peril. As the folklore goes, the Chinese stopped at Rezang La to count their dead and tend to the injured. They lost their will to move forward and retreated. The battlefield was covered in snow.
Why do we say legend or folklore in some descriptions? Simply because initially there was disbelief about what the one person who had escaped (or few survivors) had recounted. There was skepticism too.  It was only in 1963 when the snow had melted and a new battalion returned to Rezang La, (some accounts say a wandering shepherd but that should not matter) that they found the brave soldiers *of 13 Kumaon still in their trenches……Frozen. Finger still on the trigger*. To quote Guruswamy “It was as if the very last moment of battle had turned into a tableau”. This was bravery beyond the call of duty, in the line of fire. *And then, 114 bodies were cremated with full military honours in 1963 at those icy heights*. Brig TN Raina (later COAS), the Brigade Commander of 114 Brigade tasked to defend Ladakh and himself a Kumaon officer led the party that recorded the scenes for posterity and gave us a chance to tell our countrymen what happened that Sunday morning (coincidentally today is Sunday too).
The USMC war memorial inscribed after the battle of Iwo Jima in 1945 ‘uncommon courage was their common virtue’ to describe their marines. Perhaps the same can be said of the Rezangla braves. We have however been more deferential to the idea of service and duty and inscribed in their memorial these lines of *Thomas Macaulay “How can man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods.”* And this is the bravery that continues to inspire succeeding generations of Indian soldiers.
Maj Shaitan Singh was awarded the Param Vir Chakra, the highest award for bravery. The battalion also got 8 Vir Chakras and 4 Sena Medals for gallantry. 13 Kumaon got the battle honour ‘Rezangla’. Every man who fought that battle deserved a gallantry award though. *However, save some pockets of Haryana the story of Rezangla remains untold and the heroes unsung*. Of course, there has been some focus on this in the recent past. I can recollect excellent accounts by Shekar Gupta and Gaurav Arya (himself a retired officer of the Kumaon Regiment). And last year on this day, there was fair bit of remembrance. This year too over the last few days and from this morning social networks have been active remembering and recounting this battle. *Even so, this is one story that must resonate all over India. It must be told and retold, ballads sung and stories written*.
To get some sense of the poignancy and tragedy, the desolation and desperation and yet through it all human heroism and dignity, do go to you tube and watch one of the most *moving songs ever written and picturised on this war ‘Kar Chale Hum Fida..’ in, arguably, India’s best war movie ‘Haqeeqat’.* With lyrics by Kaifi Azmi, set to tune by Madan Mohan and sung by Mohammed Rafi, it is guaranteed to move you to tears. If there is just one thing you have to do today, please do this. *Read about the battle or atleast watch this song*.
Either way, before the night fades away and brings us the dawn of another day, before we go back to our worldly woes of money and mice, let us today spare a thought for the Rezangla warriors whose unsurpassed *courage will go down as one of the best and greatest examples of ‘last man, last bullet. Let us never forget Rezangla*.
We must also mourn the passing away, yesterday 17 Nov 18, of *Brig Kuldip Singh Chandpuri*, Maha Vir Chakra, VSM, the hero of the *Battle of Longewala, in 1971*. The movie ‘Border’ was made on this battle with Sunny Deol essaying then Major Kuldip Singh Chandpuri. That battle is another must read, must know, must study in Indian annals. Again, 120 infantry men of 23 Punjab against nearly 5000 Paki forces with an armoured regiment of 45 tanks. Happily in this case (though not for those who passed away) our losses were much less and it was part of a winning campaign. Let us hope our countrymen and children, today and in future become aware of such epic battles.

Govt submits Rafale papers SC to take up PILs on court-monitored CBI probe tomorrow

Govt submits Rafale papers

Satya Prakash
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, November 12

Ahead of the November 14 hearing on PILs seeking court-monitored CBI probe into the Rafale deal, the Centre on Monday shared documents with petitioners on the decision-making process for the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France, in compliance with the court’s October 31 order.

The Centre pointed out that during the long period of inconclusive Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) procurement process, “our adversaries inducted modern aircraft and upgraded their older versions. They acquired better capability air-to-air missiles and inducted indigenous fighters in large numbers.

“Further, they (India’s adversaries) modernised and inducted aircraft with advanced weapon and radar capabilities… our adversaries inducted more than 400 fighters (equivalent to more than 20 squadrons) during 2010-15. They not only inducted 4th generation aircraft but also inducted fifth generation stealth fighter aircraft. The combined effect of our own reducing combat potential and our adversaries enhancing their combat potential made the situation asymmetrical and extremely critical.”

The Centre explained the purchase of 36 Rafale Jets (two squadrons) in fly-away condition as “an urgent need to arrest the decline in the number of fighter squadrons in IAF and enhance their combat capabilities.” Rafale fighter jet is a twin-engine MMRCA made by French aerospace company Dassault Aviation.

The top court is seized of petitions filed by advocates Vineet Dandha, ML Sharma and Prashant Bhushan and former Union Ministers Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha. They have sought a court-monitored CBI probe into the deal.

A three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi — which had on October 31 asked the Centre to submit in a sealed cover in 10 days strategic, confidential and pricing details of 36 Rafale fighter jets — will take up the matter on November 14.

On Indian Offset Partners, the Centre said: “The offset contract does not envisage manufacture of 36 Rafale aircraft in India by any public or private sector firm.

As per the contract, the vendor is required to confirm the details of IOPs/products either at the time of seeking offset credits or one year prior to discharge of offset obligation.

“The annual offset implementation schedule… will commence from October 2019. The vendor is yet to submit a formal proposal in the prescribed manner…” Citing the preamble to the DPP, the Centre said, “Defence acquisition is not a standard open market commercial form of procurement and has certain unique features… As a result decision-making pertaining to defence procurement remains unique and complex.”


Boost for IAF’s VIP fleet

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, November 8

Even as a case for procurement of 48 Mi 17-V5 helicopters is underway, the Air Force’s VVIP transport fleet is getting a boost with two more such helicopters being modified for ferrying the nation’s top leaders.

The IAF’s No 3 base repair depot here, responsible for the maintenance of Russian-origin helicopters, has been tasked to convert two V5s, the Mi-17 latest version, from the conventional freighter version to VIP configuration.

The IAF has already modified a few Mi-17s for the VIP transport role, which form part of the Air Headquarters Communications Squadron based at Palam in New Delhi.

The move to induct Mi-17s in the squadron followed the phasing out of the Mi-8 helicopters and plans to induct the Italian AgustaWestland machines falling apart over corruption charges.

Modification of the choppers includes refurbishment, air-conditioning and soundproofing of the cabin, installing passenger seats as in airliners, making provisions for a small toilet and adding other necessary security and communication paraphernalia.

The IAF has projected a requirement to 6-8 Mi-17s for VIP role. While it earlier operated six Mi-8, a deal for 12 Agusta helicopters was signed, out of which three were actually delivered when the controversy erupted.

The numbers notwithstanding, a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General in 2016 had revealed significant under-utilisation of the fleet, with the shortfall in flying training being as high as 65 per cent.

The Air Force has inducted 151 Mi-17 V5 helicopters to replace Mi-8 and older versions of the Mi-17. These were assembled and flight-tested by 3BRD, where technical facilities for their maintenance and overhaul have also recently come up. Of the 48 prospective inductions, 38 would go to the IAF.


Bandi Chhor Divas

Bandi Chorh Diwas is a day on which Guru Hargobind Sahib was released with 52 Kings from Gwalior Prison. The word “Bandi” means “imprisoned”, “Chhor” means “release” and “Divas” means “day” and together “Bandi Chhor Divas” means Prisoner Release Day. It is celebrate with great joy as it was a time when “right” prevailed over “wrong”. The Mughals had held many hundreds of prisoners who were effectively “political prisoners” and were otherwise innocent leaders of their communities. They had been held without trial or any other legal process; jailed by brute force; held against their wishes.

Bandhi Chhor Diwas (Sikh Diwali): A Photo Essay

FORT OF GAWALIOR 

Bandhi Chhor Diwas (Sikh Diwali): A Photo Essay

The Guru had found a way to get 52 of these innocent leaders released from the prison without a battle. However, it had been a long process as the Guru spent many years in custody. However, in the end the unjust government of the day had to “give in” to the Guru’s just demands. An unlikely victory in a period of history when those in power were completely corrupt and injustice was the order of the day. However, the Guru had found a positive way out of an otherwise very dark situation. The lives of 52 local kings had been saved without a single shot and without a battle!

Bandi Chorh Diwas is not Diwali

http://

Bandi Chorh Diwas and Diwali are separate festivals and the events actually fall on different days; however, commonly in the popular calendars, they are celebrated on the same day. For this reason, many people often think of these events as if they are the same. In real terms, the day of release of the sixth Guru with the 52 rajahs (kings) was actually a few days before Diwali in 1619.

These two celebrations represent two quite different events in history. On Bandi Chorh Diwas, the long imprisoned Guru Hargobind was released from Gwalior, taking with him 52 long imprisoned Rajas, whose release was a result of the Guru’s wit.

Diwali (a Hindu festival) was being celebrated on the day when the Guru reached Amritsar. On the arrival of the Guru in Amritsar, the people lit up the whole city with thousands of candles, lights and lamps like they had never done before; there was much celebration and joy.

Bandi Chorh Diwas falls on the night of Amavas in the month of Assu; this actual Bandi Chorh Diwas is celebrated each year at Gurdwara Data Bandi Chor Sahib, Gwalior with much gaiety and joy, a few days before Diwali.

Historic background

During October/November, the worldwide Sikh Sangat (community) celebrates the safe return of the sixth NanakGuru Hargobind from detention from Gwalior Fort in about October 1619. The day of his return to Amritsar coincided with the Hindu festival of Diwali, (“the festival of lights”). This concurrence has resulted in a similarity of celebrations amongst Sikhs and Hindus.

When Murtaja Khan, Nawab of Lahore, noticed that Guru Ji had constructed the Sri Akal Takhat Sahib, ‘The Throne of the Almighty’, at Amritsar, and was also strengthening his army, he informed the Mughal Emperor Jahangir about this. He also, incorrectly, emphasized that the Sikh Guru was making preparations to take revenge for his father’s torture and martyrdom. When Jahangir heard about this he at once sent Wazir Khan and Guncha Beg to Amritsar in order to arrest Guru Hargobind Sahib Ji.

But Wazir Khan, who happened to be an admirer of Guru Hargobind, rather than arresting him, requested the Guru to accompany them to Delhi telling him that Emperor Jahangir wanted to meet him. Guru Sahib accepted the invitation and soon reached Delhi.

Jahangir meets the Guru

On their first meeting when Jahangir saw the Guru, he was completely won over by his youthful charm and holiness. Jahangir asked the Young Guru whether the Hindu or Muslim religion was better. The Guru quoted some lines of Kabir. Jahangir was very impressed with this answer. Deciding to become friends with the Guru he gave him a royal welcoming. Learning that the Guru was also an avid hunter he invited Guru Hargobind to accompany him on his shikars (hunts).

On one of these hunts the Moghul Emperor was hunting a lion which had been terrorizing a small village. Suddenly out of the bush the ferocious beast charged at Jahangir. Gunshots and arrows failed to end the attack of the lion. The beast was almost upon the Emperor when Guru Hargobind jumped between them. Yelling to the lion that he must first deal with him he raised his shield to deflect the lion and with a single stroke of his sword, the lion fell dead.

The appreciative Emperor and Guru Hargobind were now becoming good friends. But Chandu Shah could not bear this. A rich banker with much influence in Jahangir’s court he had once refused, with very derogatory remarks, sugestions that he arrange a wedding between his daughter and the young Hargobind, son of Guru Arjan.

Chandu Shah continues his evils ways

Later when he realized the match could be very beneficial he tried to arrange the wedding. But Guru Arjan, having heard of the unkind remarks by then, refused the proposal. Chandu’s anger and intriques then played a large part in Guru Arjan’s death. Now seeing the growing friendship of the two leaders and still smarting over his rejection by Guru Arjan Dev (his daughter was still unmarried and thus the rotten sore on his ego was still bleeding) he began his intrigues again this time taking aim at Guru Arjan’s son, Guru Hargobind.

While at Agra, the Emperor fell seriously ill. The royal physicians tried their best but they failed to cure him. Chandu Shah now saw his chance, conspiring with the astrologers, he asked them to tell the Emperor that his sickness was due to a bad convergence of the stars.

Jahangir was told that the disease could be cured, only if some holy man would go to Gwallior Fort and continuously offer prayers to the deity there. He suggested that there could be none more appropriate than his new friend Guru Hargobind Ji and that he should be asked go to Gwallior Fort. At the Emperor’s request the Guru readily agreed and left for the Fort with several companions.

In the fort Guru Ji met many Hindu Princes who were detained there due to political reasons. Their living conditions in the fort were very deplorable. With the help of Hari Dass, the governor of fort, the Guru had their conditions improved. The princes soon joined the Guru in his daily prayers. Unknown to Chandu Shah Hari Daas was a Sikh of Guru Nanak and he had become an ardent devotee of Guru Hargobind. When Chandu wrote to Hari Daas telling him to poison Guru Sahib, he had at once placed the letter before Guru Ji.

Mian Mir intervenes

Gurdwara Bandi Chhod Sahib at Gwallior

When several months had passed without their Guru being released, Baba Buddha Ji and a group of Sikh devotees traveled to the fort to meet with the Guru. They told the Guru that the whole of Amritsar, his family, devotees and all the pilgrims who had come, from near and far to visit him, were missing his presence dearly. They were worried that their Guru might never leave the prison.

The memory of his father’s recent imprisonment, torture and death weighed heavily on their hearts. The Guru assured them that they should not worry, he would join them soon. Outside the fort Sikhs gathered and began to carried out Parbhaat-Pheris (singing Gurbani), as they walked around Gwallior Fort waiting for their beloved Guru’s release.

The Guru is released, but refuses to go alone

In the meantime Sai Mian Mir, a noted Sufi Sant and friend of both the Guru and his father, had travelled to the Emperor’s Court to meet with Jahangir asking him to release the Guru. Jahangir, who had fully recovered then ordered Wazir Khan to release Guru Sahib.

Reaching Gwallior Fort Wazir Khan informed Hari Daas of the Emperor’s order to release the Guru. Hari Daas was very pleased to hear this and quickly informed Guru Ji about the message from the Emperor. But the Guru refused to leave the fort unless the 52 princes were released as well.

Emperor agrees but sets a condition

When Wazir Khan informed the Emperor of the Guru’s desire, the Emperor first refused, but finally agreed, after Wazir Khan reminded him of the debt he owed the Guru for his recovery. Not really wanting to free the prisoners the Emperor cleverly added the following condition:

“whoever can hold on to the Guru’s cloak can be released.”

The fifty–two princes who had been detained for political reasons or for defaulting on large sums of tribute owed the Emperor, had suffered in the fort for years. The Guru with his heart full of compassion for the plight of others was determined to get the prisoners freed.

He had a cloak made with 52 corners or tails, the cloak was soon delivered. So, as the Guru walked out of the gate of the fort the fifty-two princes trailed behind, each holding on to his own tail of the Guru’s special cloak. The Guru’s cleverness had trumped Jahangir’s clever condition and liberated the fifty-two princes. Guru Hargobind is therefore also known as Bandi-Chhor (Liberator).

Bandhi Chhor Diwas (Sikh Diwali): A Photo Essay

CHOLA WITH 52 CUTS WHICH WERE HELD BY EACH KING

Bandhi Chhor Diwas (Sikh Diwali): A Photo Essay

Celebrations held at Gurdwara Bandi Chor

Gurudwara Bandi Chor is built at the place where the Guru stayed during his detention. Jahangir advised Wazir Khan to bring Guru Hargobind in his court at Delhi with great honour. Jahangir had realised that he was wrong for allowing the torture and killing of Guru Arjan Dev Ji, who had not committed any crime or offence. Wanting to exonerate himself of any guilt in the death he indicted the crime on Chandu Shah and other officers. So in order to show his innocence he wanted to meet Guru Hargobind Ji. On meeting with the Emperor Guru Ji wasted no time in telling Jahangir that there was no such thing as a bad convergance of the stars.

The Sikhs celebrate this day as Bandi Chhorr Divas i.e., “the day of release of detainees”. So in the evening, illuminations are done with “Deewalee” (earthen oil lamps), candles and fireworks.

The celebrations are held both in the Gurdwaras and in homes.

What do we learn from Bandi-Chhor Diwas?

52 Hindu Princes were freed with Guru Sahib. Guru Sahib could have left the Fort when he was offered the chance. However, Guru Ji thought of others before himself. To the Guru others’ freedom and rights were more important than his own. Guru Ji is always thinking not of his emancipation but everyone’s emancipation. This is the attitude and virtue which Guru Ji filled within his Sikhs, by putting into reality this positive message.

http://

 


#MeToo: Wife of Army Officer Alleges Harassment by Retd Brigadier

The wife of an Indian Army officer has accused a retired Brigadier of harassment and defamation while blaming the armed forces administration for not acting on her complaints.

Refuting allegations of harassment made by Roshni Ajit Kumar against retired Brigadier Jai Singh, the Indian Army on Sunday, 4 November, told The Quint that “Brigadier Singh had never met or interacted” with Kumar, who is the wife of a serving officer in the Army.

“I can make life heaven or hell for you here,” Roshni Ajit Kumar was allegedly told by Brigadier Jai Singh, who had purportedly offered to help her out anytime, “even in the night, if required.” Brigadier Singh was the Station Commanding Officer of the Delhi area at the time of the incident, and is learnt to have retired on Wednesday, 31 October 2018.

According to a Facebook post by Kumar, which has now been removed, the incident dates back to 2014 and took place inside the Army cantonment area in South Delhi.

In her post, Kumar states that Brigadier Jai Singh had stopped her during one of her evening walks and conveyed his “desire to be with her.”

According to Kumar, this was the second time Brigadier Singh had stopped her and made an indecent suggestion while her husband was posted miles away in Nagaland. Kumar’s husband had worked under Singh for two months prior to his posting.

Kumar also claims that Brigadier Singh had made similar suggestions to other women in the residential colony, who, for now, have decided to not speak out about their experiences.

Kumar has not filed a written complaint against Brigadier Jai Singh, and has only spoken about the allegations in her Facebook post.

Survivor Suggests Vendetta by Brigadier Singh

Since Kumar’s husband was posted in the field, the family was required to shift to a smaller accommodation, as is the norm. According to Kumar, Brigadier Singh knew that the couple had asked for an accommodation near Pratap Chowk.

The couple’s daughter was in the Class 12, and Pratap Chowk, their preferred place of residence, would have been a stone’s throw from her school and coaching centres.

After allegedly being subjected to inappropriate suggestions on that particular evening, Kumar had reportedly warned Brigadier Singh that if “he ever stopped me again, he’d have to rewrite the definition of hell and heaven.”

Following this incident, Kumar asserts that her family was not allotted a house in the locality they had asked for. She goes on to assert that Brigadier Singh was well aware of her back issues, but had still allotted the family a flat on the 7th floor of a building.

Kumar’s husband then personally appealed to higher authorities, who allotted the family a different house. But the family still had to write to Brigadier Singh every time they faced any problem within the complex, Kumar says.

A woman living on the floor above Kumar had been allegedly feeding monkeys and dogs from her balcony and at the entrance of the building. This made it impossible for Kumar and her daughter to access their balconies, which had to always be sealed because of the monkeys. This, Kumar says, had “turned their lives into hell.”

‘Brigadier Singh Invented False Charges’: Kumar

Kumar first complained about the lady on the floor above and the monkey menace to Brigadier Singh as he was in charge. When Brigadier Singh didn’t reply, Kumar wrote to higher authorities, following which she claims to have been called by Col APS Negi (Ex Adm Comdt), the officer serving and reporting to Brigadier Jai Singh.

Following this complaint, Kumar says she “was called and in presence of my upper house lady, her 16-year-old son and another officer Col Sohi, I was humiliated, cornered and threatened, stating if I write any complaint letter again, it will be torn and throw into dustbin. Also it will be seen that I am shifted out of this area with immediate notice (sic).”

On 5 March, a day after she was “humiliated and threatened,” Kumar again wrote to Brigadier Singh, who, she claims, remained silent on the matter.

After failing to get any response from Brigadier Singh, Kumar’s husband finally wrote to the GOC, Delhi Area, requesting a “a Court of Enquiry for threatening and humiliating his wife.”

In its e-mailed response to The Quint, the Army has not spoken about this incident, as alleged by Kumar.

Rattled by the GOC complaint, Brigadier Singh, Kumar claims, found a new way to needle the family. This time, they were accused of overstaying at an Army property.

“Brig Jai Singh (who also held the post of judge EO Court) immediately on 20 March 2015, exactly after my first complaint, sent a show-cause notice stating we have to pay Rs 2.70 lakh towards overstay at a government house. An overstay that we never did. Our vacating document from MES to my husband has stated Nil. Neither were we ever sent any show-cause notice ever before till we rightfully vacated and shifted here. We were approached to settle the matter and the amount shall be excused but then we opted to pay and fight it legally…”
Roshni Ajit Kumar, Survivor

Family’s Stay at Bungalow Was Unauthorised: Indian Army

Reacting to Kumar’s allegation that her family had never overstayed, the Indian Army told The Quint that after Kumar’s husband was posted to the field, the family was offered a separate accommodation, which they kept declining.

According to the Army, the officer (Kumar’s husband) “insisted on staying in bungalow type accommodation which is not permissible beyond two months on being posted out.” The Army believes that by refusing to shift to a different apartment, the family had overstayed in an “unauthorised manner.”

As per the procedure, the unauthorised occupation was referred to Estate  Officers’ Court and the officer was fined amount of Rs 2,71,190 for unauthorised occupation. “The issue was deliberated and the fined amount was halved by the competent authority,” the Indian Army Added.

Kumar,on the contrary, claims that an Army officer had approached her husband, and offered to settle the case by waiving the cost the couple had paid, for allegedly overstaying at the government house. However, she has not been able to offer any evidence in this regard.

The case is presently on at Patiala House Court, New Delhi.

Complainant ‘Quite Possibly ‘Overreacting’: Brigadier’s Letter

Kumar claims that in order to seek revenge for Kumar and her husband’s complaint to the higher authorities, Brigadier Singh wrote to all commands questioning the mental condition of “the lady” (Kumar) and said that her accusations should not be taken seriously as it was “quite possible” that she was “over exaggerating and overreacting.”

The letter, provided to The Quint by Kumar, says Kumar’s husband had “stated that his wife was undergoing Neuro treatment in R&R (Army Research and Referral hospital), as the mental condition of the lady is not anomalous.” Kumar claims her husband never made such a statement and the entire charge was fabricated by Brigadier Singh.

A copy of the letter written by Brigadier Singh to multiple Army commands.
A copy of the letter written by Brigadier Singh to multiple Army commands.
(Photo: The Quint)

Kumar also claims in her post that Brigadier Singh, in the same letter, had accused her husband of sedition. Accessed by The Quint, the letter says that the complaint written by Kumar’s husband to the GOC is “seditious in nature.”

This reporter had sent a detailed questionnaire to the Army PRO, asking how Brigadier Singh was allowed to place sedition charges. While the Army claims that Brigadier Singh never met Kumar, it has not answered the specific question as to why Brigadier Singh had called the letter written by Kumar’s husband ‘seditious.’

Army Inquiry Found Kumar’s Charges ‘Untrue’

Kumar claims that she had first complained to the Army Women’s Welfare Association, but they too remained silent. The Delhi Commission for Women headed by Swati Maliwal was approached, but it too did not act on the matter, alleges Kumar.

In her Facebook post, Kumar claims she had written to the National Human Rights Commission, but the Army’s response to it came only after a gruelling wait of three-and-a-half years. Her post adds that in that report, the Army said the charges levelled by Kumar against two of its officers were untrue. The Army said it did not find any substance in Kumar’s allegation that she was humiliated by Col APS Negi (Ex Adm Comdt), the post claims.

According to the e-mailed response by the Indian Army, Kumar had filed two written complaints, one with the NHRC and the second with the Chief of Army Staff. The Army then asked her to withdraw one of the two complaints, so as to “facilitate the inquiry by the Army.” However, the Army claims that there was “no response from her (Kumar).”

The Army has not clarified exactly how it found the charges levelled by Kumar to be untrue. It has confirmed that Brigadier Singh retired on 31 October 2018 and added that further information will be made available after contacting him.

“He’s actually managed to make my life hell,” says Kumar, as she looks back at that unpleasant evening. She says that not only has the Army denied her true justice, but it has also remained silent on how Brigadier Jai Singh was allowed to call her mentally ill and accuse her husband of sedition.

(The Quint is now on WhatsApp. To receive handpicked stories on topics you care about, subscribe to our WhatsApp services. Just go to TheQuint.com/WhatsApp and hit the Subscribe button.)


Sanctity of the Military Ranks Beyond Equivalence By Narender Kumar

Former President of the United States, Mr Barack Obama once saw police officers in Ferguson armed with military grade weapons. He asked the Homeland security who authorised these weapons to the police. As a result, he, as the President of United States, issued an executive order in 2015 prohibiting the transfer of a host of equipment, including armored vehicles, grenade launchers, high-caliber weapons and camouflage uniforms over the “militarization” of the police. He was aware of the significance to maintain sanctity of military status as highest in the state. It is blasphemous to compare soldiers with another profession because the soldiers earn the glory for the nation by spilling their own blood. Soldiers in battle never seek a written order to lay down their lives in the line of duty.
Sanctity of military ranks and placing them above all services is not a creation of rank conscious Indian military but a convention that has become a law across all nations. The Lord Jesus Christ Himself recognized that power of Pontius Pilate “which has been given from above” (Jn. 19:11): the power of the sword, to kill and to defend a state from its enemies rests with the soldiers. The legislation, government, judiciary and the farmers can function if the state is defended by powerful armies. That is why the profession of arms was considered the most valued profession by almost every scripture- Gita, Bible and Quran; and a soldier was placed at highest pedestal in a state and society.
Not many people know that the military ranks have been sanctified by tens of names of martyrs and hundreds of nameless martyrs. These ranks have not been picked up at random but from those who laid down their lives in defending their respective nations. Idea was that every time you address a solider by his rank you actually honour the martyr by remembering him. The respect given to the profession of arms was such that no one could become a king or shepherd of a church without serving in the military.  The importance of serving in the military was so significant that those who refused to serve in the military could never become part of the body of the Church and member of the court of the king. Thus the profession of the arms was and will continue to remain above all other professions in spite of the fact that there has been constant conspiracy to erode it. Even today the British Crown Prince is required to serve in the military.
A court official no matter how high he was not given the power to kill but it was and is vested with the soldiers. In the battlefield a soldier could kill, injure or even spare the life of an enemy and the authority rests with the soldier to decide as per his conscience. All other government functionaries can be prosecuted for killing another human. Supremacy in status was accorded to military personnel not only in Hindu scriptures but across all religions, faith and empires from Europe to Asia.
In the recent past a debate has been raging about the status of the soldiers and their leaders. One has to be completely out of sync to believe that a bureaucrat or file pusher can be equated with the soldier. How can a support staff be superior to the one whom they are supposed to be supporting? It means that the support staff in an operation theatre is even more important than the surgeon who conducts the operations over the patients. Try and tell the surgeon that henceforth he would follow the command of the man who is responsible to maintain the operation theatre and its cleanliness. Will the surgeon take orders from the support staff to conduct surgery? It is completely absurd to even imagine that sectorial or support staff as equal or even superior to the military whom they are employed to support.
What makes a soldier sacrifice his life in the line of duty? It is sense of honour and dignity of being the elite and chosen one. Why the two professions cannot be compared is because a civilian can work at leisurely pace without any irreversible loss to the self and the nation. But if a warrior does things at a leisurely pace he will not only lose his life but will also lose honour of the nation and the loss could be irreversible. Churchill had said that the military must not suffer fools or those who are incapable of understanding the art of war. Patton said while addressing the political leadership, either lead me or get out of my way to let me do things as per my ability. Civilian control is not bureaucratic control and military must resist to become subordinate to bureaucracy. It would be great disservice to the nation if the military allows itself to become subordinate to bureaucracy. If the military starts behaving like the bureaucracy, the first casualty will be warrior ethos of ‘sweat together to bleed together’ and second will be the moral contract to ‘train together to fight together”. A General must have courage to say no to the unjust orders especially that affect morale, national interest and erode the elitism among the soldiers.
There is a need to look at the larger picture. There seems to be a systematic approach to keep military engaged in fighting with the system so that it is unable to focus on maintenance of morale and its ability to prepare to fight future wars. If a Chief and his DGMO are fighting bureaucracy to protect the rank and status of soldiers, who do you think will plan for military operations at a juncture when the Indian Army was almost forced to go to war over border standoff with China? The Indian Army does not need Doklam to go to war. There is Doklam happening every day in the form of status of the forces, unresolved pay anomalies of 7 CPC, NFU, OROP and modernisation of the army. Chanakya had said, to defeat a big army fight it from within and you need no enemy to defeat biggest of the armies. Imagine the impact of the equation and reduction of the status of armed forces with the support and secretarial  staff on the officers and men? So far every officer and soldier is told there is no one equal to you in status and that’s why you are chosen to lead your men unto death.
The President of India is the Supreme Commander and a soldier serves with the pleasure of the presidential decree. No other services enjoys such a status but the question is whether the Supreme Commander should continue to remain silent over the issues that are ultimately eroding the morale and operational edge of the armed forces or use his executive powers to thwart any attempt to dilute the status of the armed forces vis a vis civilian counterparts and secretarial  staff. In fact if the rank and the status of the military is reduced, it is an insult to the office of Supreme Commander under whom the armed forces are supposed to function and warrant of precedence is issued.
Political leadership should judge whose interest it will serve if the morale of the military is eroded by creating internal dissensions. Thus it is time to identify those who are acting as enemy to fight from within the system against the last pillar of the state. Current and future governments have to decide whether they want an Army that is capable of winning future and current wars or an army that is weakened by constant attack on its stature? The current trajectory appears to be going in a direction that may create insubordination in the services headquarters because it will put military officers subordinate to support and secretarial  staff. But if the government wants to use the lowering of states of armed forces officers to group B to deflect the ire of the court against the denial of the NFU and declare Armed Forces as group B services than there cannot be greater misfortune where a government will engage and fight against its own armed forces.
No matter what happens to the overall debate, one thing is sure that the military is conscious of its rank not because it gives them status but because the rank carries the names of known and unknown martyrs. System and bureaucracy may attempt to insult the martyrs but the men who carry their ranks can’t afford to insult those who laid down their lives to protect the honour of the nation. I had written in an earlier article that the significance of salutation and what it means to a soldier when he salutes his superior, it means “sir I am ready to carry out your command” and an officer returns the salute by acknowledging that “I will lead you till last breath”. That is why an old soldier never saluted a civilian irrespective of his position because a civilian cannot lead a soldier to war and he is in no way equal to the profession of arms. If the services chiefs accept willful erosion of status of military vis a vis support and sectorial staff, they will not only do injustice to past, present and future generation of soldiers but will also insult martyrs. Soldiers do not fight for cash awards but take and give lives for the flag and colour of the ribbon. One may recall that first thing soldiers did on reaching Tiger Hill was not to wash their wounds and count their martyrs but raised the Tri Colour under the barrage of enemy artillery fire. That is why soldiers cannot be compared to any other profession because they seek glory under the shadow of the swords.

itharaman visits Rafale manufacturing facility in France

Sitharaman visits Rafale manufacturing facility in France

French Defence Minister Florence Parly receives her Indian counterpart Nirmala Sitharaman at the Hotel de Brienne in Paris on October 11. AFP

Paris, October 12

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday visited a production facility of French aerospace major Dassault Aviation near Paris where the Rafale jets to be supplied to India are being manufactured, official sources said.

They said during her visit to the plant in Argenteuil, Sitharaman spoke to officials of the Dassault Aviation, the makers of Rafale, and took stock of progress in production of the fighter jets whose delivery to India will begin in September next year.

Sitharaman arrived in Paris Thursday on a three-day visit in the midst of a massive controversy over the procurement of 36 Rafale jets under a Rs 58,000 crore government-to-government deal between India and France.

Last evening, Sitharaman held wide-ranging talks with her French counterpart Florence Parly on ways to deepen the strategic and defence cooperation between the two countries.

The talks were held under the framework of the annual Indo-French defence ministerial dialogue which was agreed to during the summit meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron in March.

Official sources said the two defence ministers held a one-on-one meeting followed by delegation-level talks, covering a range of bilateral, regional and global issues of mutual interests.

They said both the sides deliberated on co-production of military platforms and weapons by the two countries besides expanding cooperation between their armed forces, particularly in the maritime domain.

It was not immediately known whether the Rafale deal figured in the talks.

Sitharaman’s visit to France came in the backdrop of a fierce political backlash between the ruling BJP and Congress over the procurement of the jets.

In a report Wednesday, French publication Mediapart said Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of Rafale, had to choose Ambani’s firm Reliance Defence as its offsets partner in India as a trade-off for getting the deal.

When asked about the allegations, Sitharaman said that offset obligations for the deal are mandatory but not the names of the companies.

In a statement, Dassault Aviation said it has “freely chosen to make a partnership with Reliance Group, as it rejected the report by French publication Mediapart”.

The latest report followed former French President Francois Hollande’s comments last month that France was given “no choice” on selection of the Indian partner for Dassault and the Indian government proposed the name of the Indian company.

Hollande was the French president when the Rafale deal was sealed.

The Congress has been alleging massive irregularities in the deal, saying the government was procuring each aircraft at a cost of over Rs 1,670 crore as against Rs 526 crore finalised by the UPA government when it was negotiating the deal.

The Congress has also been targeting the government over selection of Reliance Defence as an offset partner for Dassault.

The government has vehemently rejected the allegations and asserted that it did not have any role in the selection of Reliance Defence. — PTI

Nirmala Sitharaman Visits Rafale Facility In France Amid Controversy

Nirmala Sitharaman arrived in Paris Thursday on a three-day visit in the midst of a massive controversy over the procurement of 36 Rafale jets under a Rs. 58,000 crore government-to-government deal between India and France.

Nirmala Sitharaman Visits Rafale Facility In France Amid Controversy

PARIS: 

HIGHLIGHTS

  1. Nirmala Sitharaman took stock of progress, spoke to Dassault officials
  2. She arrived in Paris on a 3-day visit over procurement of 36 Rafale jets
  3. Her France visit comes amid political backlash over the Rafale deal

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday visited a production facility of French aerospace major Dassault Aviation near Paris where the Rafale jets to be supplied to India are being manufactured, official sources said.

They said during her visit to the plant in Argenteuil, Ms Sitharaman spoke to officials of the Dassault Aviation, the makers of Rafale, and took stock of progress in production of the fighter jets whose delivery to India will begin in September next year.

Ms Sitharaman arrived in Paris Thursday on a three-day visit in the midst of a massive controversy over the procurement of 36 Rafale jets under a Rs. 58,000 crore government-to-government deal between India and France.

Last evening, Ms Sitharaman held wide-ranging talks with her French counterpart Florence Parly on ways to deepen the strategic and defence cooperation between the two countries.

The talks were held under the framework of the annual Indo-French defence ministerial dialogue which was agreed to during the summit meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron in March.

Official sources said the two defence ministers held a one-on-one meeting followed by delegation-level talks, covering a range of bilateral, regional and global issues of mutual interests.

They said both the sides deliberated on co-production of military platforms and weapons by the two countries besides expanding cooperation between their armed forces, particularly in the maritime domain.

It was not immediately known whether the Rafale deal figured in the talks.

Ms Sitharaman’s visit to France came in the backdrop of a fierce political backlash between the ruling BJP and Congress over the procurement of the jets.

In a report Wednesday, French publication Mediapart said Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of Rafale, had to choose Ambani’s firm Reliance Defence as its offsets partner in India as a trade-off for getting the deal.

When asked about the allegations, Ms Sitharaman said that offset obligations for the deal are mandatory but not the names of the companies.

In a statement, Dassault Aviation said it has “freely chosen to make a partnership with Reliance Group, as it rejected the report by French publication Mediapart”.

The latest report followed former French president Francois Hollande’s comments last month that France was given “no choice” on selection of the Indian partner for Dassault and the Indian government proposed the name of the Indian company. Mr Hollande was the French president when the Rafale deal was sealed.

The Congress has been alleging massive irregularities in the deal, saying the government was procuring each aircraft at a cost of over Rs. 1,670 crore as against Rs. 526 crore finalised by the UPA government when it was negotiating the deal.

The Congress has also been targeting the government over selection of Reliance Defence as an offset partner for Dassault.


S-400 can launch 72 missiles simultaneously, engage 36 targets at a time

S-400 can launch 72 missiles simultaneously, engage 36 targets at a time

The signing of the deal assumes significance as China, too, has signed a deal with Russia to procure the same missile system. Reuters file

New Delhi, October 5

The S-400 Triumf air defence system deal, inked by India and Russia on Friday notwithstanding the US pressure of sanctions, can engage up to 36 targets at a time and simultaneously launch 72 missiles.

The long- and medium-range air defence missile system, which Air Force Chief B S Dhanoa said will provide a much-needed “booster” to the Air Force, is designed to destroy air attacks, including stealth aircraft and any other aerial targets.

“The sides welcomed the conclusion of the contract for the supply of the S-400 Long Range Surface to Air Missile System to India,” a joint statement released after the delegation-level talks between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladmir Putin said.

The delivery of the missile systems, tipped to be over USD 5 billion, will start 24 months from the signing of the contract.

Acquiring the missile system will help repulse the air attacks by India’s adversaries, especially Pakistan and China.

The signing of the deal assumes significance as China, too, has signed a deal with Russia to procure the same missile system.

“This is the most lethal weapons system in the world and it provides four different types of layered air defence,” Air Vice-Marshal (retd) Manmohan Bahadur told PTI.

However, the deal comes under the purview of Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which targets Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

India has conveyed to the US its necessity to procure this air defence missile system.

In 1999, the system was demonstrated for the first time at the Kapustin Yar practice range (the Astrakhan Region) to then defence minister Igor Sergeyev. The trials of the most advanced air defense missile system were carried out in the 2000s.

The missile system has been in service since April 2007.

The S-400 is based on the S-300PMU2 air defense missile complex.

The air defence missile system comprises a combat control post, a three-coordinate jam-resistant phased array radar to detect aerial targets, six-eight air defence missile complexes (with up to 12 transporter-launchers, and also a multi-functional four-coordinate illumination and detection radar), a technical support system, a missile transporting vehicles and a training simulator, experts said.

The S-400 system can also additionally include an all-altitude radar (detector) and movable towers for an antenna post, they said.

The target detection range of this system is up to 600 kilometres and its tactical ballistic missile destruction range varies from 5-60 kilometres. PTI


In a first, Attari border pips Jallianwala Bagh in tourist footfall

AMRITSAR: For the first time, the Attari-Wagah border joint check post (JCP) has pipped Jallianwala Bagh in terms of tourist footfall and has become the second most-visited destination in Amritsar after the Golden Temple.

SAMEER SEHGAL/HTVisitors during beating the retreat ceremony at the Attari­Wagah border in Amritsar. The ceremony is being jointly followed by the two countries since 1959.As per the state tourism department, nearly 15,000 people witness beating the retreat, a flag-lowering ceremony, at the border check-post everyday. However, the number is around 25,000 on Saturdays and Sundays. Beating the retreat has been jointly followed by the two countries since 1959 with the Border Security Force (BSF) jawans and Pakistani Rangers displaying aggressive posturing and foot-stomping.

District tourism officer Gursharan Singh said, “Around 10,000 people visit Jallianwala Bagh daily and around 15,000 people witness the retreat ceremony everyday.”

“On weekends, the rush increases to more than 25,000. We are now considering the border as second most-visited tourist site in the city.”

Though the retreat ceremony starts at 5:30 pm, hundreds of people can be seen standing in queues from 2pm daily at the JCP. This is regardless of the scorching heat in summer.

NEW DEVELOPMENTS AT THE BORDER

Looking at the increasing footfall, a newly upgraded spectator gallery was constructed at the JCP at a cost of Rs 32 crore.

As per BSF officials, the old gallery could accommodate only 5,000 people but the new gallery gives space to around 25,000 viewers.

The new U-shaped gallery,

which seems to complement the one on the Pakistan side, has 32-meter height (equivalent to a nine-floor building). The 22 dooms constructed atop the gallery give it a heritage look.

The gallery has a conference hall, 140 public toilets, nine barracks for jawans, a medicalaid room, a meeting hall, a dining hall, a kitchen, an army weapon exhibition room and a souvenir shop.

Satinder Mahajan, owner of the gallery’s construction company said, “For security, we have installed 60 high-definition

imported cameras in the gallery, along with a high-quality fire-fighting system. We have also constructed a museum inside the gallery which is yet to be started. The museum will depict the glorious history of BSF, its achievements and weapons, among other things”.

“A big LED screen is also installed outside the gallery. When the entire gallery is packed on Saturday and Sunday, people see the retreat ceremony live on the screen by standing outside the gallery”, he added.

Mahajan said they spent Rs 21 lakh to install a new gate at the Indian side. “The new gate provides better view to Indian spectators to look across the border. A similar gate has also been put up at the Pakistan side”, he said.

As the sun sets, both the gates at the border are opened and the flags are lowered simultaneously.

The district tourism officer said since the new gallery was constructed, the border is attracting more tourists.

Though the BSF makes people sit inside the new gallery, it

is yet to be inaugurated.

On Wednesday, the gallery was to be inaugurated by BSF’s DG KK Sharma, but the ceremony was postponed till further date on Tuesday night.

GENERATING MORE JOBS

As the footfall at the border is increasing, there have been more opportunities of employment for people. Dozens of new eateries have opened near the border and it is like a fair every evening, outside the JCP.

Hundreds have been given

employment at the JCP to sell tricolor flags, umbrellas, cold drink, water and other food items to tourists.

Kulwant Singh, who sells junk food at the gallery said, “More than 200 workers of the Attari and nearby villages have recently been employed here.”

Harish Sharma, a local taxi driver, said, “I belong to Chandigarh and I get around 15 to 20 customers in a month for the Attari border itself. Around 1,000 taxis can be seen parked daily here. After Golden Temple, this site has generated employment for us.”

INSTILLS PATRIOTISM

Before the actual ceremony begins, women and children can be seen dancing to patriotic Bollywood songs at the border.

“It was my first visit to Amritsar

and also to watch the Retreat ceremony here. I have never experienced this in my life. The 25-minute spectacle touched my soul and instilled patriotism in me. I feel every Indian should come here once,” said Sanjeev Kumar, a tourist from Delhi.


Badnore gives nod to policy for transfer of society flats Major relief for those living in over 10,000 dwelling units in city

Badnore gives nod to policy for transfer of society flats

Chandigarh, September 28

In a major relief for thousands of people living in over 10,000 flats of group housing societies in the city, Punjab Governor and UT Administrator VP Singh Badnore has approved the new policy for transfer of flats.

The new policy will allow residents to become owners by getting the conveyance deed executed, which was stopped after the Administration started the process of framing the new policy. The Administration had started the process to review the policy for the transfer of flats six months ago.

The last transfer policy was announced in 2016. Under the current procedure, the sale/purchase was allowed on the basis of a conveyance deed, which had to be executed on the payment of stamp duty at the prevailing collector rates and after getting a no-objection certificate from the society concerned.

Sources said the Governor had given relief to residents by giving a one-time relaxation in the proposed unearned profit charges and the subsequent stamp duty. The sources said the Administration would not impose unearned profit charges on those who applied under the scheme in the next one year.

The Administration is likely to make public the details of the relaxations and other conditions soon. The residents got worried after the unearned profit charges clause was included in the policy.

The proposal for imposing unearned profit charges was included in the draft policy for transfer of flats. Unearned profit is the difference between the price paid by the original allottee and the market value of the site/building at the time of permission for the transfer. The Administration has proposed to charge 1/3rd of the unearned profit.