Category Archives: Uncategorized

HC notice to Punjab for allotting ‘barren’ land to war widow

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has issued a contempt notice to the secretary, revenue and rehabilitation, Punjab, on a petition filed by a 1971 war widow alleging allotment of “useless land” to her across the fence on the international border with Pakistan instead of a cultivable land.

The high court bench of justice Rakesh Kumar Jain has sought a reply by October 21 on the petition moved by Jasbir Kaur, wife of Major Kanwaljit Singh, a Delhi resident.

The petition says Kanwaljit was taken into custody by the Pakistan army during 1971 war but was later declared martyred and was awarded Shaurya Chakra.

he high court had in 2015 directed Punjab to allot 10 acres of cultivable land to the petitioner, as per policy of the Punjab government, or in the alternative, to make her payment for the price of the land. The court was told that the revenue department allotted her 10 acres of “useless land”, which could not be cultivated, as it situated across the fence, beyond the BSF check-post, at zero point on the International border between India and Pakistan in Amritsar.

“There is no source of irrigation. Moreover, the authorities don’t permit installation of tubewell. There are many restrictions in approaching the land even during the day. Even a temporary hut for labourers cannot be permitted,” the petitioner had submitted adding that state’s act was in violation of court orders.


Laser weaponry in border blueprint

Mukesh Ranjan

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 28

With Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s keenness to turn India’s land boundary with Pakistan watertight to block any future infiltration bid, NITI Aayog is working on a blueprint to give border policing a “technological edge” consisting of laser precision weapons and fencing.The Aayog, which has been asked to prepare a long-term Vision document for 15 years replacing the five-year plan, has assigned the task of working out a complete chapter on “internal and external” security to its member VK Sarswat, who, in turn, sources said, has been working on “future options” in the light of heightened hostilities between India and Pakistan post the Uri terror attack.Sources also confirmed that NITI Aayog is looking at weapons, which have abilities to launch “no-contact counter offensives”. Such weapons will be based on latest technologies like laser, which is high among the options. Saraswat, who was earlier secretary in Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), is working on identifying laser-based disruptive technologies.Listing out advantages of laser technology for military applications, sources in the NITI Aayog, who are in the know of the development, said such weapons have high precision and rapid on-target. These weapons also have scalable effect, which make sure avoidance of collateral damage caused by fragmenting ammunition, low logistics overhead and minimum costs per firing, they added.Laser weapon systems operate on the basic principle that laser beams are impossible to avoid or detect. They can target both enemy personnel and enemy communications and installations. The US army and navy are most advanced in laser weapons or directed energy weapons research.Experts in NITI Aayog, however, admit that currently a few challenges confront the scientific community in developing such systems, which could be mobile, rugged, cost-effective and functional under a variety of weather conditions. But still they feel, “once developed and put to use” particularly along the Line of Control in Jammu & Kashmir, will prove to be a game changer.


‘New evidence’ of Pakistan’s involvement in Pathankot?

'New evidence’ of Pakistan’s involvement in Pathankot?
Security personnel stand guard next to a barricade outside the Indian Air Force base at Pathankot in Punjab on January 2, 2016. — Reuters

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 29

India will “confront” Pakistan with new evidence it has received from the US pointing to its “involvement” in the Pathankot terrorist strike, sources in the National Investigation Agency said on Monday.

Sources claimed the NIA was compiling a detailed report based on information it received from the US on a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request that it sent.

The information received three months ago has provided new evidence of Pakistan’s “involvement” in the attack, the sources said.

NIA will send a report to the Ministry of Home Affairs. The report will then be sent to Pakistan, sources said.

The development comes within months of NIA Chief Sharad Kumar’s reported statement that the agency had no evidence to point to Pakistan establishment’s involvement in the attack.

The statement, reportedly made in an interview in June, quickly escalated into a controversy between the two rival neighbours, even as the agency claimed Kumar had been “misquoted”.

Some gunmen attacked the airbase in a pre-dawn strike on January 2.  Four gunmen of the Jaish-e-Mohammed — a militant organisation based in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir — and seven security personnel were killed in the standoff that followed.

A five-member Pakistani Joint Investigation Team (JIT), comprising Additional Inspector General of Police (IGP), a Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG), two Lt Colonels and one inspector, from Pakistan had visited India in March to collect, review and document physical evidences and to interview key witnesses and victims through the NIA in connection with the Pathankot attack.

India has been demanding that Pakistan should allow a team to visit the country for investigations.

Pakistan has denied its involvement in the attack.

The relationship between the two nations has cooled in the past few months over an ongoing unrest in Kashmir. — (With inputs from agencies)


Air Force’s 16-year wait over, Rafale deal done

Rafale deal, air force, indian air force, air force rafale jets, IAF, air force jets, rafale jets, narendra modi, modi, news, latest news, India news, national news, manohar parrikar

ixteen years after the proposal for a replacement fighter jet was first mooted by the Indian Air Force (IAF), and 17 months after Prime Minister Narendra Modiannounced acquisition of 36 fighter jets in Paris, India inked the approximately Rs 59,000-crore Rafale deal with France on Friday.

The inter-government agreement, signed between Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and his French counterpart Jean-
Yves Le Drian, specifies that the first aircraft will be inducted into the IAF within 36 months, and the full complement will be in service within 67 months.

India Signs Rs 59,000 Crore Deal With France To Acquire 36 Rafale Fighter Jets

“Rafale is a potent aircraft for deep strike capabilities. It can move at high altitudes and has potential weapons with the most modern technology. It will add to the capability of the IAF,” Parrikar said.

The induction of these 36 fighters — 28 single-seaters and eight twin-seaters — is expected to bridge the shortfall in the depleting number of fighter squadrons in the IAF.

The IAF currently has 32 fighter squadrons against an authorisation of 42, and this number is expected to come down to 25 by 2022. These 36 aircraft, however, make for only two squadrons. As reported by The Indian Express on September 18, the clinching factor for buying the two squadrons is their use for delivery of nuclear weapons after the French-built Mirage-2000s retire from service.

Top defence sources said the French fighters, equipped with Meteor air-to-air and Mica air-to-land missiles, will be delivered in flyaway condition by Dassault. Moreover, offsets of half the value of the deal will be executed by France in India within seven years. Although Dassault is yet to submit the full details of its Indian offset partners, 74 per cent of the offsets are mandated to be exported from India. Another 6 per cent of the offsets are for technological sharing, which is currently being negotiated by the DRDO.

“We expect export worth Euro 3 billion to happen from India due to offsets as part of the deal. This will take a couple of years to start but it will create jobs and opportunities in India,” sources said.

Although the base version of Rafale remains the same as the one being used by the French Air Force, the Indian version of the fighter jet will have 14 India-specific enhancements. Sources said these include the helmet mounted display, Doppler beam radar, IR search and track, and towed decoy. It is because of these enhancements that the delivery time of the first aircraft cannot be less than 36 months.

In addition, the French are also guaranteeing performance-based logistics support, which means that 75 per cent of the fleet will be airworthy at any given time. According to sources, the airworthiness of the Russian Sukhoi Su-30, the mainstay of the IAF, has reached 55 per cent with great difficulty from 46 per cent two years ago.

As reported by The Indian Express on Wednesday, the deal provides for free training of 10 IAF personnel, including three pilots, estimated to be worth Euro 100 million. The IAF will also get a guarantee for an additional 60 hours for the trainer version of Rafale fighters, and a concession to keep the weapons storage in France for an additional six months without any charge. The French have also agreed to supply spares for a period of seven years at initial cost.

After Prime Minister Modi made the announcement on purchase of 36 Rafale fighters in Paris in April last year, the French had made an offer of Euro 11.8 billion. By January this year, when French President Francois Hollande was the chief guest at the Republic Day celebrations, the French offer had come down to Euro 8.6 billion. The negotiations, however, could not be concluded between the two sides then. In May, the two sides agreed to a price of Euro 7.878 billion, and the deal was formally cleared by the Cabinet Committee on Security in August.

As per the agreement, 15 per cent of the total amount will be paid as advance, 25 per cent in 12-18 months, and the rest on schedule as per delivery, with 5 per cent of the amount being retained till the deal is completed. On questions about the high price of the French fighter, sources said the base price of a single-seat fighter is only Euro 91.07 billion, while for a two-seater it is Euro 94 billion.

“By negotiating the inflation at actual indices, but limited to 3.5 per cent, in comparison to 4 per cent or more in earlier deals, we will save Rs 4,000-14,000 crore over the deal. In addition, the annual maintenance for spares and performance-based logistics is 20-25 per cent of the cost. Besides the initial five years, an additional two years of performance-based logistics is included in the deal,” sources said.

Many experts have compared it with the benchmarked price in the original Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) deal. But Defence Ministry sources said the two prices cannot be compared.

“The price of 18 Rafale flyaway aircraft was different from the 108 which were to be made by HAL in India. Dassault had used a factor of 2.7 for labour cost in India over France, which had raised questions about it being the lowest bidder itself. It also meant that each aircraft would cost Rs 68 crore more due to manpower costs itself. The then defence minister, A K Antony, had noted on the file that he will take a decision after price has been negotiated. That never happened and we don’t even know what their final price would have been,” sources explained.


TRIBUNE SPECIAL Money being pumped into J&K to fuel unrest

Money being pumped into J&K to fuel unrest

Shaurya Karanbir Gurung

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 28

The National Investigation Agency with the help of security forces have found that that the current unrest in Kashmir as well as several other incidents in the last few months can be connected to suspicious transfers to bank accounts of local residents. The NIA explained that these incidents were believed to be fuelled by money placed and siphoned off from bank accounts of Kashmiris in the region. “The NIA’s intelligence wing has found that before and after Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani’s killing, there are six to seven instances where money was distributed just to fuel the unrest. In some cases, the money was transferred just a few days before a stone-throwing incident took place,” said a top NIA officer.Sources in the security forces based in Kashmir have also confirmed that there is an inflow of money which can be linked to the rising agitations. From July 9, a day after Wani’s killing by the security forces, to date in Kashmir there have been 439 non-violent protests and 463 stone-throwing incidents. There are 81 locations where properties of the state and security forces have been destroyed in arson or damaged. “All these incidents cannot take place without money. Money has been pumped into the state to fuel such unrest,” said an official.In relation to the current scenario, the NIA said so far Rs 35 crore had been pumped into at least 25 bank accounts of two banks, including Jammu and Kashmir Bank.“Out of this, a few lakhs have been distributed to fuel incidents of stone-throwing and other such activities of unrest, as per our analysis,” said an NIA officer.These accounts belong to small trading firms and certain individuals whose income as per their professions doesn’t warrant such transactions. For example, two people under the NIA’s scrutiny are a carpenter based in Kupwara and a “small time” businessman of south Kashmir.An NIA team in Kashmir is ascertaining whether the money is linked to militants based in Kashmir or Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. “The possible sources of the funds could be narco terrorism or hawala transactions,” said another NIA officer, adding that individuals under the agency’s scrutiny are being questioned to find out about the procurement of the funds and their disbursal. Another NIA officer explained that the flow of funds in J&K to fuel unrest has been happening since 2009. “From 2009 until Wani’s death, crores of rupees have been pumped into the state to fuel agitations,” said the officer.

Pak involved in funding, Hizb in disbursal

  • Discoveries of funds being distributed to fuel “secessionist” and terrorist activities in J&K has come to light in the NIA’s investigation of two particular cases. One of them was registered in September 2011, wherein from 2008 to January 2011, J&K-based Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists had allegedly disbursed Rs 4.57 crore, received from Pakistan through hawala channels in Delhi, to separatist leaders, Hizb cadre and other terrorist organisations for unlawful activities in J&K.
  • In the second case related to the Hizb frontal organisation, Jammu Kashmir Affecters Relief Trust (JKART), registered in October, 2011, the NIA said the Hizbul Mujahideen is allegedly involved in funding about Rs 80 crore from Pakistan for terrorist activities in J&K and Delhi from 2005 to 2012. The case’s main accused, Shafi Shah, had allegedly spent Rs 10.46 crore, received from Pakistan, on Hizb militants and their families, for marriages of locals.

Under scanner

  • The 25 bank accounts under the NIA scrutiny belong to small trading firms and certain individuals whose income as per their professions doesn’t warrant such transactions.
  • An NIA team in Kashmir is ascertaining whether the money is linked to militants based in Kashmir or Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The possible sources of the funds could be narco terrorism or hawala transactions.
  • Individuals under the agency’s scrutiny are being questioned to find out about the procurement of the funds and their disbursal.
  • The flow of funds in J&K to fuel unrest has been happening since 2009. From 2009 until Wani’s death, crores of rupees have been pumped into the state to fuel agitations and stone-throwing

Serious about punishing Pakistan, says Parrikar

Pakistan wants peace with India. I have gone the extra mile to achieve this… Burhan Wani, the young leader murdered by Indian forces, has emerged as the symbol of the latest Kashmiri intifada… PAK PM NAWAZ SHARIF, addressing the UN general assembly on Wednesday

NEW DELHI: Defence minister Manohar Parrikar dismissed on Wednesday a nuclear threat from Pakistan, describing the neighbour’s provocative statements after the Uri strike as a case of “empty vessels make more noise”.

His statement came hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met his top ministers and military commanders to weigh an effective response to the deadly weekend terrorist attack at the north Kashmir army base that killed 18 soldiers.

“The stronger man doesn’ t make too many arguments,” Parrikar said, responding to a question on Pakistan’s nuclear saber-rattling amid calls for a swift retaliation.

“How to punish, that is for us to work out. We are serious about it.”

It wasn’t immediately known what the Modi-headed cabinet committee on security decided, but he has been under pressure to keep his election promise two years ago to deal firmly with attacks on India from Pakistan. The army has said it will retaliate at a time and place of its choosing.

Something obviously went wrong in Uri, Parrikar said, stressing the government will take steps to prevent such attacks from happening again. He said he believed in the “principle of zero error” and India needed to ensure “wrongs” are not repeated.

What next? Parrikar said he preferred to “execute things” rather than talk. “India is a responsible power but that doesn’t mean I will sleep over this kind of terrorism that is being pushed from across the border,” he said.

Politicians and army veterans have called for a muscular response, including air strikes on training camps in Pakistanoccupied Kashmir.

Despite growing clamour for punishing Pakistan, India is unlikely to act rashly and its moves will be well-calculated, senior military officers said.

Parrikar said: “If required I can have a knee-jerk reaction. Sometimes knee-jerk reaction is required.” He was quick to add he was talking in general terms and not specifically about the Uri attack.

There are expectations that the NDA government will respond strongly, given that its top leaders consistently accused the previous UPA regime of being soft on terrorism. Former army chief General (retd) Bikram Singh believes the political and strategic climate has changed and the government has clearly spelt out a more robust policy on Pakistan.

“The cautious and too idealistic approach of the past has been replaced by more realistic policy,” Singh said. “Pakistan will be paid back in its own coin and spoken to only in the language it understands.”


Depleted arsenal, hollow threat :::::The Pioneer 2016-08-24 18:30

India, Aug. 25 — The Prime Minister has upped the ante against Pakistan. Before that, he should have conducted a reality check of the country’s military power. Pakistan, with China’s support, is ready to go beyond proxy war. India isn’t prepared to respond in an effective manner

In his Sunday column in this newspaper, political analyst Swapan Dasgupta wrote that, “Modi’s expression of solidarity with the people of Baluchistan and Gilgit-Baltistan is highly significant. It constitutes the first tentative step towards reviewing an early doctrine. India may fast be coming to the conclusion that it has no further interest in a stable, unified Pakistan”.

Perhaps he is right. The Prime Minister has announced his objective of getting back Pakistan occupied Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. Since the latter is either under China’s occupation or the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) passes through it, the RSS chief, Mohan Bhagwat, has asked the Government to get back those parts of Kashmir which are with Pakistan and China. But has the Modi Government considered the military perspective that the General Headquarters, Rawalpindi would be mulling over?

With Modi’s unequivocal rejection of Kashmir resolution talks with Pakistan, in Pakistan Army’s assessment, the 26-year-old proxy war into Jammu & Kashmir has run its course. It had two purposes – political and military. The political purpose was to keep the pressure on India to start bilateral Kashmir resolution talks, and to moderate the infiltration levels; they would increase or decrease depending upon the progress of the talks. Pakistan’s former foreign minister, Khurshid Kasuri confirmed this in his book, Neither A Hawk Nor A Dove. He wrote, “We realised fairly early that the peace process with India could not survive, let alone thrive, unless cross Line of Control movement was controlled. It was in this background that in 2005 and 2006, I started hearing in hushed tones at the Presidency and in some high-level meetings that centres had been set up to wean away militants from their past and impart skills to them which would help them integrate better in society”. It is another matter that the Indian Army took credit for zero-infiltration during this phase.

The military purpose was to blunt the Indian Army’s conventional war capabilities. Decades of counter-insurgency operations (CI ops), and the fence on the Line of Control which was erected in July 2004 by the army have achieved that. While the Army leadership asserts that it can re-orient itself for conventional war from CI ops in little time, it is a delusional assessment. And the Pakistan Army knows this. For example, in 1990 when the insurgency broke out in the Valley, and the Indian Army was inducted in large numbers in 1990-92, Rawalpindi was worried. Given the disproportionately massive numbers of the Indian Army in Kashmir, it could be used for sudden attack across the military line. Rawalpindi approached Washington for assurances that India would use its army only for internal stability purposes. This led to the June 1990 Gates Mission for confidence building measures between India and Pakistan.

Today, this situation has altered. Far from fearing the Indian Army, Rawalpindi does not bother much about its capabilities to fight conventional war. The Indian Army lacks war materials, training, mind-set and operational perspective which include joint operations with the Indian Air Force to fight conventional war. This has nothing to do with nuclear weapons since war planning for conventional war and nuclear war are separate in India and Pakistan. The six-lakh Pakistan Army no longer fears the 13-lakh Indian Army since it has lost conventional war deterrence.

According to the ‘Kargil Review Committee Report’ set up after the 1999 Kargil conflict: “Successive Indian chiefs of army staff and director generals of military operations told the committee that bringing to bear (on Pakistan) India’s assumed conventional superiority was not a serious option”. This situation is worse today; on demitting office, Army chief General VK Singh had confirmed in his letter to the Prime Minister which got leaked to the media that the Army was not fit for war.

Moreover, who would have expected the senior-most Jammu & Kashmir theatre commander to make a political statement on the ongoing unrest in the Valley? The GOC Northern Command, Lt Gen DS Hooda recently appealed to all stakeholders including separatists to come together to restore normalcy in Kashmir. Having spent years in Kashmir and having assessed the deteriorating situation, Hooda does not want war. He had, a few months ago, told the media that the Army had ammunition to adopt a proactive stance against Pakistan, but fighting a war would be entirely different – confirming shortage of ammunition and war materials. Overruling Hooda’s appeal, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, while speaking in Jammu, ruled out talks with separatists calling them agitators in cahoots with Pakistan.

The Pakistan military, on the other hand, has achieved inter-operability – the capability to fight together for common mission – with China’s military forces. Joint training between the two Armies and Air Forces started in 2011, months after China declared in December 2010 that it did not have a border with India in Ladakh. Unlike the Indian military, the Pakistan military today has the capability to fight long duration conventional war without resorting to nuclear weapons.

To be sure, China is not particularly happy with Modi’s India. While it will not stop work on CPEC because India objects to it, it may not be averse to helping Pakistan seeking depth to the economic corridor, with unrestricted war supplies. This is where Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar’s recent statement seems bizarre. When asked if the CPEC would militarily have negative effect on the Siachen glacier, he said that the glacier provided Indian Army observation to the CPEC. The truth is the opposite. The CPEC and Chinese forces’ holding heights on the Karakoram Pass would made Indian troops on the glacier extremely vulnerable by providing good observation to Pakistani artillery fire and cruise missiles.

Instead of understanding military power which directly influences the two military lines (with Pakistan and China) too much has been made of India’s proactive foreign policy under Modi. For instance, a Padma Shri-awarded academic recently compared Modi’s style to “a General who likes to get into the trenches and not sit in a war room a thousand miles away”. Just as a General would be a dumb soldier if he were not in his war room modifying theatre war plans depending upon the course of various tactical battles, a nation’s foreign policy is as good as the economic strength and military power supporting it.

Against this backdrop, what would Rawalpindi possibly do? Perhaps raise the level of military confrontation beyond proxy war. It has the means and Chinese support to do it. To be sure, no outside power, however friendly, will come to India’s support. India’s political leadership will do well to conduct a reality check of its own military power before raising the confrontationist pitch any further.

(The writer is editor, FORCE news magazine)


BJP and the Soldiering Community: the Widening Gulf

Major General Mrinal Suman

 It was the month of November 1971. War was imminent and the forces were being mobilised at a frenetic pace. Troops and equipment were being ferried to the forward areas by tens of special military trains every day. For the Westerns sector, Ambala, Ludhiana and Jalandhar were the main hubs as almost all trains passed through these stations.

One still recalls the warm reception the troops got at these stations. Hordes of BJP and RSS workers received the trains with shouts of ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’. Local bands were in attendance playing martial music. The atmosphere was charged with nationalist fervour. Troops were treated with tremendous warmth; honoured with garland; served hot food and tea; and assured of the whole country’s support.

It was an unforgettable experience. BJP endeared itself to the soldiering community. Soldiers’ esteem for the party went up considerably and they have been voting for the party. Modi’s arrival in the last general election further consolidated the bond. 

The above has been recounted here to compare the then prevailing bonhomie with the present state of fast spreading disillusionment with BJP. Modi-euphoria amongst the soldiers is on the wane. Soon, the honeymoon will be over for good. All the goodwill and support assiduously garnered by BJP workers over the years have been frittered away by the short-sighted leadership.

During an informal survey in Punjab, almost all soldiers and veterans expressed their disenchantment with the current government. They are convinced that BJP is an equally self-seeking party, out to garner votes by exploiting neglected soldiers’ gullibility. The general perception is that Manohar Parrikar is helpless due to some inimical elements’ anti-soldier influence on Modi. They hold Modi responsible for letting them down.

The most surprising aspect of the complete phenomenon is that in spite of granting OROP (whatever be the form), Modi government has failed to earn credit for it. On the contrary, there is an acute sense of betrayal amongst the soldiers. Why and how has the relationship reached such a low point? Here are some obvious reasons.

Seeds of distrust were sown during the very first meeting of the then Defence Minister Jaitley with the veterans. His advice to them to lower their expectations came as a bolt from the blue. The veterans were aghast. How could BJP leadership renege on a solemn commitment? To soldiers, it was an act of sacrilege. They felt cheated and used.

The issue of OROP was handled in a most graceless and blundering manner. It took undue long for the government to announce it, denting its credibility. By that time, the soldiering community had lost its patience and faith. Jantar Mantra protest did immense damage to BJP’s standing. Worse, sights of police manhandling aged veterans will remain etched in the minds of all soldiers as a proof of government’s insincerity. No political leader from the ruling party displayed the sagacity to visit the protesting veterans to assuage their hurt feelings. The neglect was seen as a deliberate snub and it compounded distrust.

One wonders at the intelligence of the policy makers who agreed to spend over Rs 8,000 crore but left veterans dissatisfied for a few hundred crores by tweaking the well-accepted definition of OROP. Resultantly, instead of earning gratitude, it forced veterans to go to the courts. Can there be a bigger example of senseless behaviour!

Although the government claims that the National Commission for Ex-Servicemen Bill 2015 has already been drafted, there is no news of its likely introduction in the parliament. Even the draft has not been put in the public domain for suggestions of the stakeholders. Twenty six months is a long period for any ‘government that works’ to have the bill legislated. Apprehensions are being expressed that the proposed commission will be nothing more than a parking slot for the retired bureaucrats.

Approval for the construction of a National War Memorial and a National War Museum near India Gate was granted in October 2015 at an estimated cost of Rs 500 crore. Further progress is not known.

The department to look after the welfare of ex-servicemen remains staffed with personnel whose sole mission in life is to inflict indignity on the veterans. Not a single service officer has been posted to it. Despite Parrikar’s assertions to the contrary, the government continues to contest court orders given in favour of the ex-servicemen with vindictiveness and wickedness.  

With Modi’s reputation for taking bold decisions, it was expected that his government would initiate long overdue reforms in the higher defence management of the country. Nothing has been done and not a single progressive step has been taken. It is apathy as usual. There is no sign of the appointment of Chief of Defence Service. No creation of joint commands. No integration of service personnel in the Ministry of Defence. It will not be incorrect to deduce that the obdurate bureaucracy remains untamed.

BJP’s handling of the issues pertaining to the seventh pay commission is symptomatic of the brazenness of its duplicitous and hypocritical mindset. It has failed to safeguard soldiers’ interests. The least it could have done was to co-opt some service officers with the Empowered Committee of Secretaries. But then, it is too much to expect such a farsighted approach from a blinkered leadership that is hell-bent to shoot itself in the foot by losing the backing of the solid support base of soldiers and ex-servicemen.

 

Even the dumbest of the dumb knows that there is no justification for denying Non- Functional Upgradation to the services. Indiscipline has become rampant in the organisations that are manned jointly by uniformed and civilian officers. As seniority is decided on the basis of pay, every civilian considers himself senior to his service boss. The working environment has got terribly vitiated but the government continues to remain blind. 

   

Modi and his advisors failed to understand the psychology of soldiers. They treated them as a vote bank with false promises. For soldiers, a promise made by the leadership is a solemn commitment without any ifs and buts. They consider it to be a matter of honour. Breach means loss of credibility.

Unfortunately, smug in its unexpected victory in the general elections, BJP considers itself to be invincible. It has failed to appreciate the sensitivities of the soldiers. Despite repeated requests, Modi has not been able to spare a few minutes to meet the veterans during the last 26 months – some arrogance and disdain for the soldiering community.

 

BJP can write off states that have massive soldiering fraternity, like Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand. Punjab is not Assam. In Punjab, almost all families have ties with the services. Time is fast running out for BJP. Even Kejriwal has started appearing more sincere and true to his word than Modi.

 

Somehow, the environment has come to believe that the ruling trio of Modi, Shah and Jaitley hold the soldiers in contempt and intentionally humiliate them through deliberate indifference and downgradation. Haughtiness seems to have gone to their heads. They will do well to remember what Swami Vivekanand cautioned, “Arrogance is the first sign of degeneration.”*****  

 

 

 

 

clip

clip

clip


World’s ‘largest aircraft’ Airlander 10 gets off ground

World’s ‘largest aircraft’ Airlander 10 gets off ground
The Airlander 10 hybrid airship makes its maiden flight at Cardington Airfield in Britain. Reuters

London, August 18

The world’s “largest aircraft” has embarked on its maiden flight, four days after a previous attempt was abandoned due to technical issues.

The Airlander 10 — part plane, part airship — on Wednesday took to the skies amid cheers and applause from crowds gathered at an airfield in Cardington, central England.

The successful flight comes 85 years after another airship — the ill-fated R101 — took off from the same airfield in October 1930 before crashing in France, killing 48 people and effectively ending the development of airships in Britain.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Originally developed for the US Army as a surveillance aircraft, the 92-metre-long Airlander 10, also has potential uses in the commercial sector, such as carrying cargo, according to makers Hybrid Air Vehicles (HAV).

The firm, which describes the Airlander as the “largest aircraft currently flying”, received a British government grant of $3.7 million to develop the project.

The Airlander can fly at up to 4,880 metres and reach speeds of 148 kilometres per hour, according to HAV.

Filled with helium, it can stay airborne for more than two weeks unmanned and up to five days if manned.

Its first flight was delayed on Sunday due to a technical fault, which was resolved in time for the aircraft to take off in clear weather conditions for yesterday’s 30-minute flight.

HAV CEO Stephen McGlennan said the aircraft was cheaper and greener than helicopter technology.

“It’s a great British innovation. It’s a combination of an aircraft that has parts of normal fixed wing aircraft, it’s got helicopter, it’s got airship,” he said.

A project to develop the aircraft for surveillance use by the US military was shelved due to budget cuts. — AFP


Ex-servicemen observe black day, hold march Protest against the incident in which the Central govt used force on protesters last year

Ex-servicemen observe black day, hold march
Members of the Ex-Servicemen Welfare Union, Punjab, protest in Bathinda on Sunday. Photo: vijay kumar

Tribune News Service

Bathinda, August 14

Members of the Bathinda unit of the Ex-Servicemen Welfare Union, Punjab, today submitted a memorandum to the tehsildar, addressed to the President of India.They have alleged that the Punjab Government was meting step-motherly treatment to the ex-servicemen.They have stated that they have not only guarded the border but also fought and won wars with neighbouring countries.They said their long-pending demand for some changes in the sixth pay commission had been hanging fire while the government had implemented the recommendations of the seventh pay commission.They have stated that on August 14 last year, when ex-servicemen were staging a protest at Jantar Mantar, the BJP-led Central government used force on the protesters, which cannot be forgoten. Various foreign countries also condemned this act of the government, they added.Even police officials of Delhi tendered an apology but ministers of the Union government didn’t condemned the incident, they said.In view of what happened, ex-servicemen decided to observe August 14 as black day and took out a protest march in the city.They have demanded that the President should issue instructions to the BJP-led Central government not to use force on ex-servicemen sitting on protest in any part of the country in future.Capt Bhagwant Singh, Joga Singh, Chota Singh, Capt Jeet Singh, Major Singh, Satpal Singh and others participated in the protest.

Demands

  • They said their long-pending demand for some changes in the sixth pay commission had been hanging fire while the government had implemented the recommendations of the seventh pay commission
  • They have demanded that the President should issue instructions to the Centre not to use force on ex-servicemen protesting in any part of the country in future