US President Donald Trump said on Monday that Russia and Ukraine “will immediately start negotiations” toward a ceasefire and an end to their three-year-old war, speaking after he held a call with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.
Advertisement
“Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine will begin immediately,” Trump said in a Truth Social post following his call with Putin, which lasted two hours.
After the call, Putin said efforts to end the war were “generally on the right track” and that Moscow was ready to work with Ukraine on a potential peace deal.
“We have agreed with the president of the United States that Russia will propose and is ready to work with the Ukrainian side on a memorandum on a possible future peace accord,” Putin told reporters near the Black Sea resort of Sochi.
There was no immediate comment from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the statement that talks would begin immediately. A source familiar with the matter earlier said Zelenskyy spoke “for a few minutes” with Trump before the US leader’s call with Putin.
Kyiv has said it is ready for a ceasefire now while Moscow has said conditions must be met first.
US Vice President JD Vance earlier repeated a warning that Washington could walk away from the peace process.
Putin said the memorandum would define “a number of positions, such as, for example, the principles of settlement, the timing of a possible peace agreement.”
Putin said, “The main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis”. He is likely referring to Crimea, the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, and the regions of Kherson and Zaporozhye, which voted in favor of joining Russia in referendums in 2014 and 2022.
Putin was speaking from Russia’s Black Sea resort of Sochi while Trump was in Washington. Shortly before the call, Vance told reporters that Washington recognised there was “a bit of an impasse here”.
He said, “We’re going to try to end it, but if we can’t end it, we’re eventually going to say: ‘You know what? That was worth a try, but we’re not doing any more.’”
TWO developments in the last 10 days — first, the swift punishment to Pakistan in Operation Sindoor and India’s diplomatic measures earlier; second, the recall of high tariffs by the US on China — will affect global realignments.
India met the strategic objectives of the operation, which included the destruction of Pakistan’s terrorist infrastructure; setting up a new deterrence against terror attacks; inflicting considerable damage to Pakistan’s key airbases and establishing military superiority and ability to strike wherever it wanted.
Without crossing the LoC or the International Border, India launched missiles and drones on May 7 at Pakistan’s nine terror bases, some deep inside the country, in a calibrated, measured and responsible manner, hitting its targets with few civilian casualties.
Pakistan’s Air Defence (AD) system failed to intercept the missiles. More than 100 terrorists, including some top leaders of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed and Hizbul Mujahideen such as Abu Jundal, Hafiz Muhammed Jameel, Khalid and Mohammed Hassan Khan, were killed in the strikes. Their close links with the Pakistan army were visible as senior army officials attended their funeral.
When Pakistan tried to launch missile and drone attacks against Indian airbases on the night of May 7-8, the multi-layered Indian AD system comprising the indigenous Akashteer, Akash missiles, air defence guns, Russian S-400 and Israeli Barak 8 easily neutralised Pakistan’s Chinese, Turkish and indigenous missiles and drones.
As a result, the Indian airfields, logistic installations and military infrastructure remain largely unaffected by the enemy’s retaliation.
The ISRO’s 10 satellites working round the clock played a stellar role in informing the Indian armed forces about the enemy’s positions, military infrastructure and bombing attempts.
India’s Brahmos missiles were able to bomb the Sargodha airport near Rawalpindi by confusing its radars with pilotless aircraft. It sent shockwaves in the neighbouring Kirana hills that house Pakistan’s nukes and the Pakistan army headquarters in Rawalpindi.
The Indian satellites could see the blind spots in the Chinese and American AD systems, including radars, and Indian missiles struck those positions with pinpoint accuracy. That is when Pakistan got alarmed and contacted its American friends and the Chinese ‘iron brother’.
The Brahmos caused massive damage to a number of other Pakistani airbases, too, including those at Chaklala, Bholari and Jacobabad (near another nuke site in Chagai Hills), destroying a Pakistani AWACS parked at Bholari. Indian military officials have shown satellite images of these damages in public briefings.
Pakistan, China and American lobbies have made considerable efforts to portray the success of the Pakistani bombing efforts by alleging that Pakistan had hit five Indian fighter aircraft, including three Rafales, one Mirage and one Sukhoi, in its initial raids, but they have not been able to present any corroborating evidence.
India dominated the air space and maritime theatre, with aircraft carrier Vikrant and other accompanying ships positioned at a comfortable distance from the Karachi port.
After the ceasefire, PM Narendra Modi told Pakistan that Operation Sindoor had only been paused. Any further terror attack by Pakistan would be considered an act of war by India and India would retaliate at a time and place of its choosing. He added that India would not accept Pakistan’s nuclear blackmail and the Indus Waters Treaty would remain in abeyance till Pakistan ceased cross-border terrorism against India.
India can draw multiple lessons from this operation. First, that future wars will be more technology driven and India must stay ahead of its adversaries in the adoption of new technologies, training and networking of different platforms. Second, Pakistan’s nukes are no barrier to a conventional war. Three, India must send more satellites for full scanning of the military infrastructure of its adversaries and establish a robust GPS.
China plans to send 300 satellites by 2030 in low orbits for high-resolution images. India must become more atmanirbhar in every field by pursuing research, innovation and new technologies.
The West and China do not want Pakistan to go under. They will continue to play Pakistan against India and India against China to weaken both India and China. The Quad has limited relevance. Initially, the USA extended some support to India. But later, it became neutral, treating both India and Pakistan equally, notwithstanding that India was a victim of Pakistan’s terror attack.
Regarding the other important development that happened during this period — the US recalled the high tariff of 145 per cent on Chinese imports and reduced the tariff to 30 per cent and China reduced the 125 per cent tariff on imports of American goods to 10 per cent.
The Trump administration reduced the tariff as the American GDP declined by 0.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2025. Plus, Goldman Sachs predicted last week that the US inflation could double to 4 per cent by the year-end. China was also concerned as it witnessed a steep drop in its exports of goods to the US. Also, its manufacturing sector started contracting at its fastest pace in April 2025.
But the US blinked first, without getting any concessions from China on its “unfair economic practices”, making many wonder about what Trump had achieved from imposing high tariffs except global ridicule.
The US’ global leadership has considerably weakened with a transactional, isolationist and mercantile President. Russia has rebuffed Trump’s attempts at mediation, except on its own terms.
Israel is going ahead with the elimination of security threat from Hamas. The experiences of China, Canada and others indicate that a tougher approach works better with the Trump administration.
Meanwhile, India’s hi-tech military operation against Pakistan will boost its military preparedness against China as most of the equipment used by Pakistan in the recent standoff was of Chinese origin.
India will be hedging more by establishing closer ties with its traditional partners rather than any special relationship with the US.
Many countries of Asia, Europe and the Global South will now partner with India for joint research and innovation, learning from its military experiences and buying more defence equipment.
Yogesh Gupta is former Ambassador to Denmark and ex-High Commissioner to Zambia.
Why the world ignored role of Turkiye in Indo-Pak conflict
THE four-day intense standoff between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor was marked by violations and aerial assaults along the International Border, redefining red lines and pushing the two countries to the brink of war. Amid the fog of mounting tensions, an unexpected actor emerged to strengthen the Pakistani hand — Turkiye. Pakistan and Turkiye have long had close relations, with Ankara regularly supporting Islamabad on Kashmir. But this time, the proximity was far more specific, and, more importantly, hostile to India.
With drone warfare becoming a defining feature of the conflict, Ankara’s fingerprint on Islamabad’s Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos became harder to ignore. Indian military briefings confirmed that Pakistan had launched nearly 400-500 drones into the Indian airspace. As many as 350 of them were reportedly of Turkish origins. They reportedly include Bayraktar TB2, a medium-altitude long-endurance tactical UAV, Byker YIHA III kamikaze drones, and Asisguard Songar-armed drones.
What makes the Turkish role more concerning is the inclusion of the Songar-armed drones in Pakistan’s aerial toolkit. Unlike the Bayraktar TB2 or YIHA kamikaze drones, which were recorded in Pakistan’s arsenal in 2022 and 2023, respectively, there is no public record of the Songar being transferred to Pakistan. Songar is Turkiye’s first indigenously made armed drone system and it has been with the country’s military since 2020. Media reports of 2022 suggest the drones were sold to three unnamed countries in the Asia-Pacific and Africa regions.
However, publicly available data about Pakistan’s UAV inventory does not specifically mention the Songar, suggesting that this sale was likely fast-tracked in the brief window between the April 22 Pahalgam attacks and the May 7 Operation Sindoor launch.
During this period, several interactions between Turkiye and Pakistan were recorded. Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was in Turkiye on the day of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. On April 27, as tensions began escalating along the Indo-Pak border, a Turkish C-130 Hercules jet reportedly landed in Karachi. While Turkiye has dismissed it as a routine refuelling stop and categorically denied the use of the plane for sending arms, the timing and parallel Turkish support for Pakistan through this conflict have raised significant doubts. This was followed by the visit of a high-level delegation led by Turkish intelligence chief to the Pakistan air force headquarters on April 30. Finally, the TCG BUYUKADA, a Turkish naval warship, arrived at the Karachi port on May 5 and remained docked till May 7.
These developments suggest that the Turkish support went beyond the symbolic messaging of solidarity from the leadership and was a deliberate effort to bolster Pakistan’s military capability and deterrence against India.
However, a report by India Today published after the ceasefire has added a concerning layer to the Turkish involvement. The report, quoting unidentified sources, suggests that two Turkish military operators, who helped Pakistan coordinate drone attacks on India after May 7, were reportedly killed
While neither Turkiye nor Pakistan have confirmed this, the embedding of Turkish military advisers in a combat operation reveals an alarming edge of their military partnership and compels New Delhi to review Ankara’s role in the recent standoff and recalibrate its approach.
Turkiye’s ability to bolster Pakistan’s military posture without direct accountability reflects a broader involvement in their global engagements. Both countries have managed to straddle competing power blocs for their own interests. Nowhere is this more visible than in the two countries’simultaneous engagements with the US, China and Russia.
Islamabad and Ankara have long leveraged their geographical positioning in South Asia and West Asia to become indispensable assets in varying engagements of these superpower rivals.
Pakistan became a key player for the US in 2001 with its operations in Afghanistan. Since then, the US has provided Pakistan with military equipment, including tanks, surveillance radars, fighter jets, missiles and drones. When the US halted defence sales to Pakistan, China emerged to fill the vacuum. As Islamabad’s all-weather ally, Beijing has expanded Pakistan’s arsenal with a steady supply of weapons, many of which were used in the recent standoff against India.
Turkiye, a NATO member, is a major American partner in the region, housing strategic American military bases and receiving key military equipment, including fighter jets, tanks, ships and other hardware. At the same time, Turkiye has managed to diversify its military partnerships by getting its hands on the Russian S-400, a sophisticated surface-to-air missile system. Finally, Turkiye is also a member of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and a part of the “Silk Road Economic Belt” route that travels through Central Asia, Iran and Europe.
Due to these parallel engagements, many argue that the US-Turkiye partnership had hit an all-time low, but with Donald Trump back at the White House, this partnership has received a new impetus.
Despite Turkiye’s overt role in the Indo-Pak standoff, Washington has reaffirmed its defence ties with Ankara by announcing a $350-million missile sale just days after the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. This should definitely be a cause of concern for New Delhi, especially in light of the growing military cooperation between Turkiye and Pakistan.
Operation Sindoor has not only bared the depth of the Turkiye-Pakistan military partnership but also shown that global powers, even while backing India diplomatically, may turn a blind eye to this partnership to suit their own strategic calculi.
Aishwarya Airy is a researcher at Centre for Land Warfare Studies.
Col Sofiya Qureshi and her husband are proud #IndianArmy Officers. Military tradition comes to Sofiya naturally as her father fought in Bangladesh Liberation War.
Her grandfather also served in Indian Army and
her great grandmother fought alongside Rani Jhansi in 1857. 🇮🇳
Via Brig Hardeep Singh Sohi (R) on X
Supreme Court rejects apology by MP minister Vijay Shah; orders SIT probe against him
Rejecting the apology by Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Kunwar Vijay Shah, the Supreme Court on Monday ordered an SIT probe against him over his controversial remarks against Col Sofia Qureshi – the face of India’s press briefings on ‘Operation Sindoor’.
“We are constituting an SIT with three IPS officers and one should be of the rank of IGP. All of them should be from outside the state. It’s a litmus test and we want the state to submit the SIT report to us. We would like to have a very close watch,” a Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh ordered.
It directed the Madhya Pradesh Director General of Police to constitute the Special Investigation Team (SIT) by Tuesday.
The Bench, however, stayed Shah’s arrest and ordered the minister to join the probe. It also issued notice to the state of Madhya Pradesh on Shah’s petition challenging the high court’s order for registration of an FIR against him.
Asking the SIT to submit a report to it, the Bench posted the matter for May 28.
“The kind of crass comments you made, completely thoughtless…We don’t need this apology,” Justice Kant said, terming it an attempt to wriggle out of the legal consequences of his statement.
“Meanwhile, you think how you will redeem yourself…Entire nation is ashamed of… We are a country that firmly believes in the rule of law,” Justice Kant said.
“You (Shah) are a public figure…a seasoned politician. You should weigh your words when you speak. Should we display your video here?Media people are not going into depth of your video…you were at a stage where you were going to use abusive language, very filthy language…but something prevailed on you and you stopped. This is an important issue for the Armed Forces. We need to be very responsible,” the Bench said.On behalf of Shah, senior counsel Maninder Singh submitted that the minister has publicly apologised for his remarks.
“What kind of apology? What’s that apology? Sometimes people apologise to wriggle out of legal liabilities. Sometimes crocodile tears. What kind of apology is yours?” Justice Kant asked.
“The kind of crass comments you made, completely thoughtlessly. What prevented you from making a sincere attempt? We don’t require your apology. We know how to deal with it as per the law…Your apology – we are not ready to accept. It’s only to wriggle out of legal liability. We have rejected your apology. You have said “if somebody is hurt…”. You are not even ready to take responsibility,” Justice Kant said, rejecting Shah’s apology.
It also questioned the state of Madhya Pradesh for not doing enough in the matter. “People expect the state action will be fair… The High Court has done its duty, they thought suo motu action was needed. You (State of Madhya Pradesh) should have done something more by now,” the Bench noted.
Earlier, terming Shah’s controversial remarks against Col Sofia Qureshi as “irresponsible”, “unacceptable” and “insensitive”, a Bench led by CJI BR Gavai had on May 15 said persons holding constitutional positions should exercise restraint in their public utterances.
Onus on political leadership to decry trolling of civil servants
The government has not tried to identify the trolls and take action against them, nor has it publicly expressed any solidarity with Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri.
It would have been a high-level political decision for official briefings on Operation Sindoor to be led by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, with the participation of Col Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh. Misri, Qureshi and Singh were calm and professional during the briefings. They were to-the-point and faultless regarding the diplomatic and military aspects of Operation Sindoor, reflecting the firm resolve of the nation in combating terrorism at its source. All three did the country proud.
It is therefore profoundly sad that two of the three — Misri and Qureshi — have been targeted by the bigoted and the ignorant. Sections of the media, civil society, a few civil service associations, the National Commission for Women and some Opposition political parties have risen up against the vicious trolling of Misri and his daughter. At the same time, the Madhya Pradesh High Court took the strongest objection to a minister (Vijay Shah) in the MP government making a remark about Qureshi and ordered that a FIR be filed against him. Subsequently, the MP Chief Minister and the BJP state head pulled up the minister, who apologised for his remark.
But in all this time, no minister of the Union government has still uttered a word at the outrageous trolling of Misri nor the remark against Qureshi.
As a former member of the Indian Foreign Service, which Misri currently heads — as the Foreign Secretary is traditionally the head of the Foreign Service cadre of serving officers — I cannot but feel dismayed, hurt and diminished that he has been so abusively trolled. I feel all the sadder because his daughter has also been trolled. This is a new low in India’s public life. It can be argued that the trolls are ignorant but ignorance is neither a defence in law or common decency and propriety.
The ruling dispensation states that the nation is entering Amrit Kaal when it will make unprecedented progress and dharma will prevail. Will such trolling of civil servants and their families be a characteristic of Amrit Kaal and will no action be taken against the trolls? This question is not unreasonable, for the government has not only not tried to identify the trolls and take action against them, it has not even publicly expressed any solidarity with Misri.
Is this behaviour a part of the practice of the Indian political class — that it lets civil servants take the flak for policies and actions they have ordered or sanctioned and approved, but may not be liked by the public? Domestic civil service officers, now retired like me, have told me that while the Misri episode may be new for the IFS — an officer having to face intense anger for a decision he has not taken, but is only conveying to the public — it was not so for them.
These officers have told me about many personal experiences where a political leader remained silent or simply slipped away, when people were demonstrating against a decision he had taken, but was being implemented by bureaucrats. One retired civil service friend went so far as to say that a politician told him that his political colleague was in trouble, because he had stood by civil servants when the police went after them in a corruption case.
In the light of this practice, perhaps it isn’t so surprising that neither Misri nor his daughter have received any support from the ruling dispensation. But by not doing so, I wonder if the government is allowing a precedent to be set that may come to haunt it in different and unforeseen ways? Many of our children, including those of our politicians, are studying and living abroad — surely, nobody wants a new front of trolling to be opened against them.
Misri’s daughter was trolled because she had written once for The Wire, a news and opinion portal which the ruling dispensation views as hostile. She was also ‘accused’ of providing legal assistance to the Rohingya community. Now Misri’s daughter is a lawyer in her own right and lawyers assist all kinds of persons. Besides, even if her thinking is at variance with that of the government, that cannot be held against her father or the work he’s doing. Moreover, as a citizen in a functioning democracy, she has every right to have her views of her own.
In the tradition of the IFS, Misri has maintained a stoic silence. This is also in keeping with the man and his Foreign Service training honed over the experience of decades in trying assignments.
But while his junior colleagues will take heart from his conduct in this matter, some of them may feel that the least that they can expect is that the political leadership condemns the trolls. This could be, in particular, an expectation from the political head of the MEA, for he has been a professional diplomat who also served as Foreign Secretary. Can such an expectation said to be unreasonable?
Vivek Katju is former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs.
Manish Tewari cites Kishore song to declare he will travel with govt delegation on Op Sindoor outreach
Even as the Congress kept its leaders guessing over its stand with respect to the government nominees in the delegations finalised for global outreach on Operation Sindoor, Chandigarh MP Manish Tewari cited a Kishore Kumar song to announce his acceptance for the tour.
After Shashi Tharoor, former minister Tewari becomes the second Congress leader who has conveyed his acknowledgment for the government invitation to be part of the group that will present the Indian position on Pakistan sponsored terror to the world.
Tewari, like Thatoor, hasn’t been nominated by the Congress, though both are on the government list.
Taking to X today, Tewari said:
“A song from the movie ‘Akraman ‘ 1975 sung by Kishore Kumar for Rajesh Khanna reminds us as how to answer the call of the nation
Even as the Congress kept its leaders guessing over its stand with respect to the government nominees in the delegations finalised for global outreach on Operation Sindoor, Chandigarh MP Manish Tewari cited a Kishore Kumar song to announce his acceptance for the tour.
After Shashi Tharoor, former minister Tewari becomes the second Congress leader who has conveyed his acknowledgment for the government invitation to be part of the group that will present the Indian position on Pakistan sponsored terror to the world.
Tewari, like Thatoor, hasn’t been nominated by the Congress, though both are on the government list.
Taking to X today, Tewari said:
“A song from the movie ‘Akraman ‘ 1975 sung by Kishore Kumar for Rajesh Khanna reminds us as how to answer the call of the nation
Maa na kahe ke mere beteDekho Veer Jawanon Apne Khoon Pe | Kishore Kumar | Aakraman 1975 Patriot….”
Tewari’s X post came hours after Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said the party was leaving it to the conscience of MPs who are not on the official list of the party to decide whether they would participate in the government outreach.
Last night though Jairam had in a statement said the MPs would “of course go.”
Other Congress leaders named by the government but not by the party are Salman Khurshid and Amar Singh.They are yet to formally announce their decision on whether they will travel.
Anand Sharma is the only official Congress nominee the government has included in its delegation. The other three Congress nominees are Gaurav Gogoi, Nasir Hussain and Raja Brar.
These three have not found a place in government panels.
A song from the movie ‘Akraman ‘ 1975 sung by Kishore Kumar for Rajesh Khanna shows us as how to answer the call of the nation
“Dekho veer Jawaanon apne Khoon pe yeh Ilzaam na aaye Maa na kahe ke mere bete Waqt pada to kaam na aaye “
Tewari’s X post came hours after Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said the party was leaving it to the conscience of MPs who are not on the official list of the party to decide whether they would participate in the government outreach.
Last night though Jairam had in a statement said the MPs would “of course go.”
Other Congress leaders named by the government but not by the party are Salman Khurshid and Amar Singh.They are yet to formally announce their decision on whether they will travel.
Anand Sharma is the only official Congress nominee the government has included in its delegation. The other three Congress nominees are Gaurav Gogoi, Nasir Hussain and Raja Brar.
These three have not found a place in government panels.
Ashoka University professor challenges arrest in Supreme Court
Arrested for “endangering India’s sovereignty, unity and integrity” by his alleged comments on Operation Sindoor, Ashoka University associate professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad on Monday moved the Supreme Court challenging his arrest.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned his petition before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai for urgent hearing.The CJI agreed to take up the matter on Tuesday or Wednesday.
The professor was arrested on Sunday after two FIRs were lodged against him.
The Haryana State Commission for Women had recently sent a notice to him questioning his remarks.
Mahmudabad had said that his remarks were “misunderstood”.
4,000 volunteers have been identified for the initiative
The Jammu and Kashmir Government has approved a proposal for deploying former military personnel to safeguard vital infrastructure across the Union Territory, an official said on Saturday.
Terming it a unique collaboration between veterans and civil authorities, the official said 4,000 ex-servicemen volunteers have been identified for the initiative, and their role is “non-combatant”, focusing on static guard duties, presence-based deterrence, and local coordination.
“In a major step towards strengthening community-based security and harnessing the capabilities of former military personnel, the Sainik Welfare Board of Jammu and Kashmir had moved a proposal for mobilising Ex-Servicemen (ESM) to safeguard vital infrastructure across the Union Territory.
“This proposal has now been formally approved by the Jammu and Kashmir government, setting the stage for a unique collaboration between veterans and civil authorities,” officials said here.
According to the approved plan, 4,000 ex-servicemen have been identified, and among them, 435 possess licensed personal weapons, significantly enhancing the capacity to respond effectively to localised security situations, the official said.
“The ex-servicemen will be employed for the protection of critical infrastructure in all 20 districts of Jammu and Kashmir, including power stations, bridges, government installations, and other vulnerable points,” he said.
The initiative builds upon the previous success during the Covid pandemic, where 2,500 ex-servicemen volunteered to support the administration. The increase to 4,000 reflects both the growing spirit of service among veterans and the trust reposed in them by the government and local populace.
As outlined in the proposal, these volunteers will serve under the overall coordination of the respective District Sainik Welfare Officers. They will function in close coordination with the district administration and local police.
“Uniforms and basic equipment will be provided through the Sainik Welfare Board with administrative support from district authorities, while training and orientation programmes are being planned to ensure standardised conduct and efficiency,” the official said.
This initiative not only utilises the discipline, experience, and commitment of the ESM community but also represents a model of inclusive and participatory security, they said.
State Stalwarts
DEFENCES FORCES RNKS
ARMY, NAVY, AIRFORCE RANKS
FORMATION SIGNS
FORMATION SIGNS
ALL HUMANS ARE ONE CREATED BY GOD
HINDUS,MUSLIMS,SIKHS.ISAI SAB HAI BHAI BHAI
CHIEF PATRON ALL INDIA SANJHA MORCHA
LT GEN JASBIR SINGH DHALIWAL, DOGRA
PATRON ALL INDIA SANJHA MORCHA
MAJOR GEN HARVIJAY SINGH, SENA MEDAL ,corps of signals
.
.
DARING FEMALE OFFICERS
COL SOFIA QUERESHI ,Wg Cdr VYOMIKA SINGH
PRESIDENT DISTT LUDHIANA : ALL INDIA EXSERVICEMEN SANJHA MORCHA
BRIG SS GILL ARTY
PRESIDENT PANCHKULA HARYANA UNIT SANJHA MORCHA
BRIG DALJIT THUKRAL (Retd) BENGAL SAPPERS
PRESIDENT DISTT MOHALI :ALL INDIA SANJHA MORCHA
COL BALBIR SINGH , ARTY
SECY (HONY) NRI’s ESMs , ALL INDIA SANJHA MORCHA
SUB AVTAR SINGH
+1(647)501-8112
INDIAN DEFENCE FORCES
DEFENCE FORCES INTEGRATED LOGO
FORCES FLAGS
15 Th PRESIDENT OF INDIA SUPREME COMMANDER ARMED FORCES
Droupadi Murmu
DEFENCE MINISTER
Minister Rajnath Singh
CHIEF OF DEFENCE STAFF (2nd)
General Anil Chauhan PVSM UYSM AVSM SM VSM
INDIAN FORCES CHIEFS
CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF(29th)
General Upendra Dwivedi, PVSM, AVSM (30 Jun 2024 to Till Date)
