All posts by webadmin

Raipur, July 31

A CRPF jawan was killed in an improvised explosive device (IED) blast triggered by Naxals in Bastar district of Chhattisgarh on Wednesday, officials said.

The blast took place around 6 am near a camp of 195th battalion of the Central Reserve Police Force at Pushpal in Bastar when one of its patrol teams was on its way back, they said.

A constable-rank jawan was trapped in the blast, the officials said. PT

Paramilitary personnel pay respects to martyrs at the ITBP headquarters. tribune photo: Vishal kumar

ITBP personnel participate in a run for martyrs in Amritsar on Tuesday. tribune photo: Vishal kumar

Amritsar, July 23

Paramilitary personnel commemorated the victory of the nation in the Kargil war by holding a number of programmes here.

A 5-km race titled ‘Run for martyrs’ was organised by 52 Battalion, Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), at New Amritsar. Apart from ITBP officials, civilians also took part in it.

Baljit Singh, Commandant, 52 Battalion, ITBP, said the run started from the New Amritsar market and concluded at the ITBP camp. The BSF held a blood donation camp as a part of a week-long Kargil war commemoration programme.

As many as 127 volunteers donated blood. As many as 59 BSF personnel and 68 civilians were among the donors at the Attari joint checkpost. Visitors, who had come to witness the Retreat ceremony, also donated blood.

JS Oberoi, DIG, BSF paid floral tributes to the martyrs.

Rajouri, July 6

After a lull of fortnight, the Pakistan army on Friday night resorted to unprovoked heavy firing and shelling in the Baba Khori area of Rajouri.

According to reports, two soldiers suffered splinter injuries and were taken to Army Hospital. They have been identified as Sepoy R Gautam and Naik K Singh.

“At 9 pm, Pakistan initiated unprovoked ceasefire violation with small arms followed by shelling with mortars along the Line of Control in the Nowshera sector. The Army has retaliated beffitingly,” said Lt Col Devender Anand, PRO Defence (Jammu).

During the last six months, the Pakistan army has violated the truce 1,248 times on the LoC and four soldiers have attained martyrdom, including three in March and one in June.

On June 10, a soldier was killed while three others, including a BSF constable, were injured in Poonch. On June 16, two minor girls were injured in the Shahpur area along with an Army porter. On June 17, a BSF constable was injured in Poonch. — OC

The move to tax disability pensions awarded to superannuated soldiers upset serving and retired members of the armed forces, who pointed to veterans like Major General Ian Cardozo, who, during the 1971 war, amputated his own leg to prevent the setting of gangrene

The Army’s reaction was also set out in an unsigned letter, shared on social media by Nirmala Sitharamam

NEW DELHI: 

The Indian Army today endorsed the government’s decision to tax pensions given to personnel superannuated from the service.The government, however, said it will not tax pensions paid to soldiers who suffered disabling injuries in the line of duty. In a series of messages posted on social media, the Army criticised “personnel seeking disability, even for lifestyle diseases” for tax-exemption purposes and said it highlighted a worrying trend in the face of “security challenges to the nation”

The Army’s reaction was also set out in an unsigned letter, shared on social media by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharamam, in which it said “some veterans feel that the courage and valour displayed by soldiers wounded in battle should be compensated for by mere financial remuneration”.

“Over the years broad-banding and compensation awarded for disability with income tax exemption, have led to a rise in personnel seeking disability, even for lifestyle diseases. The trend is worrisome and that too when the security challenges to the nation are on the rise,” the Army said in a tweet.

However, the Army, in its letter, reminded its veterans that “Maj. Gen. Ian Cardozo (Retd), #IndianArmy is a highly respected gallant soldier of 1971 war whose deeds exemplify true ethos of soldiering. As a living legend he has never let disability come between profession & military rigours.”

“… remuneration alone cannot compensate for disabilities. The service must continue to provide them necessary support through their career in the Army and post their superannuation. This aspect is being exploited by unscrupulous personnel who have gained from disability benefits provided by the government to disabled soldiers,” the letter continued.

In a circular issued on June 24, the Central Board of Direct Taxes said pensions drawn by personnel who retired under normal circumstances would be taxed. It also clarified that disability pensions, which are additional payments, measured by rank, made to personnel who suffer disabling injuries in the line of duty, would remain tax free.

The centre has been criticised for its decision to tax disability pensions, with Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury raising the issue in the Lok Sabha last week.

As soon as Mr Chowdhury raised the issue, Congress members rushed the well and raised slogans like “Sena ko nayay do‘ (give justice to Army)” and ”sena ke naam pe vote mangana band karo‘ (stop asking votes in the name of Army)”.

In response, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said, “I will look into the issue. The ministry is gathering information and will get back with details to the House.”

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, June 30

Even as the process to re-equip soldiers with a new contemporary assault rifle drags on, the Army is moving to modify the AK-47 rifles in its inventory with new accessories to meet its emerging operational requirements.

A process has been initiated for acquiring “weapon speciality kits” that includes items like tactical flashlight, fiber reinforced pistol grip, swing swivel attachment, polymer rails, rubberised pistol fore front grip, cheek rest, pointing grip, extendable butt stock and side mount that can be attached to the rifle in the field as and when required.

“Due to change in scenario and change in tactics being adopted by terrorists, there is a need to modify the AK-47 with arrangements to mount night sight, holographic sight, flash light and laser beam for early engagement of targets and to increase operational efficiency of troops,” states a request for information (RFI) floated by the Amy this week.

While the indigenous INSAS rifle is the Army’s standard weapon, units deployed for counter-terrorism or other specialist tasks are equipped with different versions of the AK-47 for providing greater fire power that is needed for such operations. The Army wants to replace the INSAS which has not only become obsolete but is also prone to glitches.

The weapon speciality kit comprises parts which can replace the existing parts of Rifle AK-47, thereby enhancing the utility of the weapon and at the same time make the firer comfortable and increase the chances of align engagement, the RFI adds.

The items will not require any tool to fix on to the rifle and the exercise can be undertaken in field conditions during operations without the need to refer to a workshop or a skilled technician.

The Army’s desire to procure new assault rifles has been bogged down for years due to financial constraints and red tape, with some reports indicating that only the infantry and some other arms will get new rifles. In February, a deal was signed to procure 72,400 Swiss SIG-716 assault rifles. A deal with Russia is also in the works to procure 6,50,000 Kalashnikov AK-103/203 assault rifles.

Enhancing utility

A process has been initiated for acquiring ‘weapon speciality kits’ that includes items like tactical flashlight, fiber reinforced pistol grip, swing swivel attachment, polymer rails, rubberised pistol fore front grip, cheek rest, pointing grip, extendable butt stock and side mount that can be attached to the rifle in the field as and when required

The onus is on the Army to continue with the practice of swift and stern action against dereliction of duty or negligence which is a risk to security and lives. Any dilution or compromise on such action will only give a handle to the government to intervene in military matters.

Maj Gen Amrit Pal Singh (Retd)
Military commentator

MILITARY command and its intangibles/variables are starkly different from heading a government department or an office. The recent reports of the government having communicated its recommendation to the Army regarding action to be taken against the senior leadership in command of the Uri brigade, Sunjuwan miltary base and the Nagrota Cantonment are glaring in their inability to recognise this basic difference. The government’s recommendation suggests that the commanders put in their resignation papers and retire prematurely. Thirty-six soldiers were martyred in the three attacks — Uri and Nagrota (2016) and the Sunjuwan base (2017).

The Army conducts internal inquiries and after-action reports are made to analyse all incidents such as IED attacks on convoys and counter-terror operations in the hinterland. In all cases, lapses are identified, lessons drawn out and standard operating procedures suitably modified at all levels from the battalion to divisional and higher to improve defensive and offensive aspects of operations. These lessons are imparted to battalions inducting into the disturbed areas in the battle schools where troops and commanders are trained. The lapses also reveal individual or collective failures; strict action, either disciplinary or administrative, is initiated against those responsible. Lapses could be of omission or commission and both are considered for award of corrective and exemplary punishment. The armed forces are arguably the swiftest and surest in the initiation of inquiries and the meting out of punishment which have sometimes resulted in cashiering and discharge from service.

Command of troops and combat decisions are unique. The forces take ‘command responsibility’ very seriously as command of troops is a sacrosanct duty, the dereliction of which invites strict and swift action. The fact that a wrong command or directive can lead to the loss of life and limb is ingrained in the training and grooming of young officers and JCOs right from their commissioning. It is also well known that the services have a steep pyramidical structure and officers rise to higher ranks by selection and merit which always factor in the command potential and failings of the officers at each level of promotion. Command reports of officers and JCOs are of two types — command in peace stations and ‘field’ areas. Command in field areas, where there is direct contact with the enemy or terrorist actions, is given more weightage and there is focus on moral and physical courage along with tactical and operational acumen. Unlike the other central services where officers get promoted as a batch, here, the failings and recorded field reports are given primacy so that no act of command failure or lack of courage — both moral and physical — goes unnoticed.

Earlier this year, the Cabinet secretariat and the Central Vigilance Commission had reportedly initiated identification in various departments of corrupt, non-performing officers and those with questionable integrity for compulsory retirement. In the case of the bureaucrats who were fired in mid-June, there have been grievous and repeated cases against them; the sacking has evoked a seemingly positive response from bureaucrats in general. There seems to be a tilt of the bureaucrats towards culling unproductive and corrupt members of their flock rather than accept lateral entries who, they argue, could also fall prey to corruption and inefficiency. The armed forces, on the other hand, have a continuous weeding-out process in their selection of higher commanders. Corruption and lack of leadership qualities top the list of the ‘reject criteria’. The selection process is different and so are the service conditions. In such a situation, the same yardsticks must not apply to military commanders.

The Pakistani establishment, and the Pakistani army in particular, is focused on using border action teams of special troops, sometimes with a mix of terrorists, to attack posts and bases along the Line of Control (LoC). Many such attacks are thwarted with heavy loss to the enemy but these don’t make the news. In areas where enemy and terrorist actions are imminent, there are multiple layers of command that come into play in a single action. The firefight starts at the machine gun-post or sentry-post level and quickly escalates to the company commander and base commander levels. Various detachments swing into action and there is urgency to seal the breach even in the face of lack of information which sometimes leads to casualties. In attacks that happen at nighttime and during the wee hours, troops are resting in the barracks while sentries man the perimeter posts. Detachments are also returning from night patrols and ambushes at the same time. There are elaborate procedures to identify friend or foe, but the chances of terrorists sneaking in dressed in similar uniform are very high, especially if a distraction has been created just before the incursion. All posts and bases have well-set drills which the commanders review and change frequently to avoid the enemy from using deceit and new tactics. 

The corrective actions taken by the internal systems of the armed forces have been applied. In some cases, commanders have been removed from command, which in itself is the biggest humiliation a commander can face. The implementation of the government’s recommendation will tantamount to double jeopardy as corrective disciplinary and administrative actions have already been taken. The reports suggest that earlier too the government had attempted action against commanders. However, the military has resisted these attempts in the interests of operational effectiveness. Let’s hope that the system takes cognisance of the peculiar and operational differences of military command in counter-terror and conventional operations from that of a case of corruption, inefficiency or departmental failure. Equally, the onus is also on the Army to continue with the practice of swift and stern action against dereliction of duty or negligence which is a risk to security and lives. Any dilution or compromise on such action will only give a handle to the government to intervene in military matters.

Tribune News Service

Jammu, June 21

Gen Bipin Rawat, Chief of Army Staff, accompanied by Northern Command chief Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, visited troops on the Line of Control (LoC) to review the prevailing situation and operational readiness of the units of the White Knight Corps.

The Army Chief was briefed and updated by Lt Gen Paramjit Singh, General Officer Commanding, White Knight Corps, and ground commanders. He reviewed the mission readiness of units, response mechanism to ceasefire violations, measures adopted to deal with Pakistan proxies, counter-infiltration posture and preparation to deal with violent actions on the LoC.

In addition, the Army Chief was also briefed on the strategy to deal with inimical elements who are attempting to revive terrorism south of Pir Panjal, misguiding youth and attempts to radicalise the innocent youth.

Interacting with soldiers deployed on the LoC and for counter-terrorism operations, General Rawat commended them for their unwavering dedication to duty, selfless devotion and high standard of professionalism.

He was appreciative of the measures and standard operating procedures instituted by the units to ensure secure environment, synergy with the civil administration, and mission readiness.

Conveying his satisfaction on the state of operational readiness, he assured material and moral support for enhancing the Army’s capabilities.

He exhorted all ranks on the need to remain vigilant to counter the nefarious designs of the enemy and anti-national elements.

During the visit to the forward areas, he rewarded the soldiers for gallant actions on the LoC.

For too long, lip service has been paid to the modernisation of the forces. Maritime security has been particularly neglected. The immediate replacement of obsolete/obsolescent weapons and equipment must be addressed by Rajnath to ensure qualitative upgrade of combat capabilities for tomorrow’s battlefields.

Gurmeet Kanwal
Former Director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi

Rajnath Singh has taken over as the Defence Minister at a time of strategic uncertainty and growing regional instability. The country faces multifarious threats and challenges in both conventional and sub-conventional fields of conflict. Besides, non-traditional vulnerabilities to contend with such as cyber war and defence of assets in outer space are emerging on the horizon.

While the resolution of the longstanding territorial disputes with China and Pakistan and the latter’s proxy war as well as internal security issues will doubtlessly engage his attention, defence preparedness and higher defence management must be given an equally high priority.

First, the minister must address what a former Army Chief, Gen VK Singh, had termed as ‘critical hollowness’ in defence preparedness: insufficient units in some fighting formations (according to authorised scales), large-scale ammunition deficiencies and inordinate equipment shortages.

For too long, lip service has been paid to the modernisation of the forces. Maritime security has been particularly neglected. The immediate replacement of obsolete/obsolescent weapons and equipment must be addressed to ensure qualitative upgrade of combat capabilities for tomorrow’s battlefields.

Better combat capabilities require more funds than being provided presently. The current defence budget, pegged at less than 1.5 per cent of the projected GDP, is grossly inadequate to support the modernisation of the forces. The ratio of revenue to capital expenditure, which is approximately 60:40 (for the Army, it is 80:20) shows that the bulk of defence expenditure goes towards salaries, rations, ammunition, transport and other day-to-day necessities. The capital budget is utilised mainly to service committed liabilities (previously purchased weapons system being paid for in annual instalments), leaving little or no funds for new acquisitions for modernisation.

India has the lowest per capita defence expenditure among major powers and a very low citizens-to-soldier ratio. Successive Parliamentary Standing Committees for Defence have recommended that the ratio of defence expenditure be raised to 3 per cent of the GDP.  To begin with, it must be raised to at least 2 per cent in the current year.

Five-year Defence Plans are not being given the committed budgetary support, which leads to notional planning. A rolling, non-lapsable defence modernisation fund, linked with the Consolidated Fund of India, is needed. The NDA government had instituted such a fund in the interim budget of 2004-05, but the proposal did not find favour with the UPA government that followed.

Long-term defence planning is being neglected and is marked by haphazard single-Service growth. Defence planning is the responsibility of the National Security Council, which seldom meets. The Defence Minister should consider recommending the formation of a national security commission. The commission should formulate India’s national security strategy, after conducting a long overdue strategic defence review.

Defence reforms are urgently needed. A Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)/ permanent Chairman COSC should be appointed. This step should be followed a few years later by reorganising single-Service commands into integrated theatre commands for better synergy in joint operations. Tri-Service aerospace, cyber, special forces and integrated logistics commands are necessary to meet emerging challenges.

For a better civil-military interface, it is necessary to undertake a comprehensive integration of the Ministry of Defence and the armed forces HQ; it is nominal at present. To ensure rapid indigenisation of defence production in line with the Prime Minister’s call to ‘Make in India’, the minister must expeditiously review the defence procurement procedures so as to streamline them and eliminate the remaining red tape.

A holistic review of the functioning of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is called for so that the private sector and universities are usefully involved in research and development. Similarly, the privatisation of most of the ordnance factories and the defence PSUs has been discussed for long but not implemented. Besides improving functional efficiency, such an exercise will result in considerable savings.

Analysts have commented that India lacks a strategic culture. The minister must involve himself in the raising of strategic consciousness in the country. The establishment of the National Defence University has been long delayed and must be taken up immediately. The Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) and the think tanks established by the armed forces — CLAWS, NMF, CAPS, and CENJOWS —must be given greater encouragement and funding support. Their analyses and recommendations should be given due weightage in decision-making.

The softer issues affecting the morale of the armed forces must not be neglected. While the National War Memorial has at last been constructed to honour personnel who made the supreme sacrifice in the service of the nation, the issue concerning the pay and allowances and the welfare of serving soldiers as well as veterans continues to be ignored. The anomalies of the Sixth and Seventh Pay Commissions are yet to be resolved. The shortage of ‘married accommodation’ in peace stations is excessively high. The MoD continues to indulge in excessive litigation against soldiers.

In fact, the present state of civil-military relations is far from healthy. Distrust does not result in smooth functioning. Armed forces personnel are desirous of the restoration of their post-Independence status vis-à-vis civilian employees. While that may not now be possible, an acceptable solution can be found.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has a great deal on his plate. Not all the issues listed above can possibly be resolved satisfactorily in one five-year tenure. Surely, the new minister will prioritise wisely, decide quickly and implement his decisions resolutely.