Sanjha Morcha

All posts by webadmin

Defence strategy experts need of the hour, says ex-Army chief

Defence strategy experts need of the hour, says ex-Army chief
Union Minister of State for External Affairs Gen VK Singh (second from left) with VC Prof AK Grover and other dignitaries at Golden Jubliee Hall, PU, in Chandigarh, on Saturday. Tribune photo: Manoj Mahajan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, March 26

Indian universities should produce experts in defence strategic studies to guide military personnel not to repeat their old mistakes if any war is fought in the future. Former Army chief and Union Minister of State for External Affairs and Statistics and Programme Implementation (Independent Charge) Gen V K Singh stated this while addressing a seminar on ‘1962 War: an Appraisal’ at Panjab University here today. The event also marked the book release of “1962 The War That Wasn’t” by Shiv Kunal Verma.Referring to the PU Defence Studies Department where courses related to the strategic studies was going on, he said such departments were the need of the hour. He said in other developed countries special departments were created by the government so that specialisation and analysis of history and wars of the country could be done to understand the loopholes. This was done so that their soldiers did not repeat such mistakes in future wars. But in India, defence studies meant what we learn in NCC and nothing else, he said. During his address, he said those who did not learn from history suffered a lot in future.Referring to the 1962 war, he appreciated the courage of the Indian soldiers and said they performed well but the defeat was due to political establishment and leadership at the top of the military which lacked in taking the right decision at the right time. He stressed upon analysing the situation of 1962 war to learn what went wrong so that it should not be repeated by the military in the future.Clarifying the myth that after Independence,  the military was keen to go on war to show their might to the neighbours, he said during the 1962 war, military was not taken into confidence by political heads before taking a final call on the war. The political establishment cheated the military by not actively consulting it.Meanwhile, filmmaker and military historian Shiv Kunal Verma who authored the book “1962 The War That Wasn’t” mentioned that while signing the Panchsheel Agreement, India made concessions to China which was against the advice given by the military leadership. PU VC Prof Arun Kumar Grover called upon the Department of Defence and National Security Studies to reach out to the military leadership and retired military officers and create a think tank.  Gen Kulwant Singh, Maj Gen Rajendar Nath, Brig Amarjit Singh Behl and Brigadier DK Khullar also shared their views.The 1962 war veterans Maj Gen Rajendar Nath, Brigadier Amarjit Singh Behl and Brig DK Khullar were also present. They were given standing ovation by the audience.


At 99, Army tells war widow to get husband’s record from ‘Rangoon’

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC ISSUES NOTICE TO ARMY ON PETITION FROM WIDOW OF WW II VETERAN ASKING FOR PENSION AFTER HUSBAND’S DEATH

CHANDIGARH: More than two years after Army authorities asked Gurdial Kaur, 99, the widow of a World War II veteran, to go to ‘Rangoon’ to get the records of her husband’s service before she could be paid pension after his death, the woman has finally petitioned the Punjab and Haryana high court and the Army authorities have been issued notice for April 12.

Gurdial, the widow of Naik Harnam Singh of the Myanmar (earlier Burma) Army, is entitled to family pension on the death of her husband in 2012, but has not been paid a penny since, with her application lost in the maze of the army’s maze of legalese and bureaucracy.

An instance of this is the army letter to her on October 8, 2013, that asked her to fetch her husband’s service record from Rangoon (the erstwhile capital of Myanmar), even as that country shifted its capital to a new city, Naypyidaw, in 2006.

As things stand now, even the Adjutant General Branch of the Army is not clear on which record office has to process her case. EVEN THE PRESIDENT WAS APPROACHED

When pension was first delayed to her after the death of her husband, she wrote to President Pranab Mukherjee for help who marked her letter to the ministry of defence. The letter then reached the army headquarters. The record offices of Artillery, Punjab Regiment, Bihar Regiment, Parachute and Army Air Defence claimed that they did not have any record pertaining to Naik Harnam Singh.

Finally, the office of Artillery Records who asked her to approach ‘Rangoon’ in Myanmar.

Gurdial then approached the high court in March this year claiming that her case was being kept in abeyance by the army even as there had been extensive correspondence between her and the army. In the petition, she claimed that the army officials had been totally devoid of any empathic approach towards her and had been merely engaged in internal discourse all the time.

She also claimed that her case was languishing from one table to another, from one record office to another, at the behest of the army authorities.

“I have not got anything so far. I can’t go from one office to another at this age,” she said. The last pension her husband got was of around ` 8,400.

After the British annexed Myanmar to the Indian province during their rule, a uniform system of administration throughout the colonial government was established. The system remained even after Myanmar’s separation from British India in 1937; whereby, many Indian nationals continued serving in Myanmar, as in the case of Harnam. He even served with the Myanmar Army during World War II.

As per the Myanmar government, in the event of death of the military personal concerned after retirement, the family pension was restricted to the period remaining up to 10 years from the date of retirement or up to the date on which the concerned personal would have attained the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.

In 2009, the Indian government brought out a policy for paying pension to such employees. Harnam gained from the policy and continued to get pension till his death in 2012.

Soldier found dead at house in Rupnagar

An Armyman died under mysterious circumstances in his rented house on Friday. Naib subedar Gurnam Singh of 24 Punjab regiment, a native of Raipur Munney village near Nurpur Bedi, lived at Gillco Valley Colony and was posted near Srinagar

RUPNAGAR: An Armyman died under mysterious circumstances in his rented house on Friday night here. Naib subedar Gurnam Singh of 24 Punjab regiment, who belonged to Raipur Munney village near Nurpur Bedi, lived at Gillco Valley Colony here and was posted near Srinagar.

Gurnam’s brother, Darshan Singh, said the soldier was due to resume duty on Saturday after a break. He said that around 6.30am on Saturday, house owner Satpal Singh had called him up to say that Gurnam had died of electrocution from a faulty television set. The soldier leaves behind his wife, Manjit Kaur, and a daughter.

Police and forensic experts visited the spot and collected fingerprints and other evidence. The autopsy was done at the local civil hospital. City station house officer(SHO) Pawan Kumar said since the soldier’s family suspected no foul play in the death, police had initiated inquest proceedings under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and they would wait for autopsy report.


DIVIDED ON THE HEIGHTS

FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 2016 BY INDIANDEFENSE NEWS
Geographically, Siachen is an integral part of Jammu and Kashmir as the “undivided” territory thereof spans from 72.5 degree East to 80.2 degree East longitude (west-east axis) and 37.1 degree North to 32.4 degree North latitude (north-south axis). Today’s ground position, however, is that Jammu and Kashmir is a “politically divided” territory and stands as “shared” geography between India and Pakistan. The Indian position, nevertheless, stands on professed political and legal provision, making Jammu and Kashmir one of India’s 29 states that constitute the Indian nation as defined, prescribed and described by Article 1 of the Constitution of India. In fact, the accession of Jammu and Kashmir (under which falls Siachen) to the Indian state on October 26, 1947 pre-dates the birth of the Republic of India on January 26, 1950. Thus prima facie, the scenario is this: geographically, Siachen (indisputably) stands within, and hence is part of, Jammu and Kashmir, and the latter is an integral part of the Republic of India. Hence Siachen is part and parcel of India.
Now, what is the exact location and position of Siachen? How does one get there? Theoretically, the access route lies through Drass, Kargil, Saraks, Turtuk (just north-west of Turtuk heights is Gulshan-e-Kabir under Pakistan) and further north to Siachen, which can be approached through one of the most deadly and difficult high altitude terrains of Diskit, Hunder, Sumur and Panamik leading to Siachen. That places Siachen – which is one of the largest glaciers outside of Polar region, with a length of more than 70 kilometre -in eastern Karakoram Himalayas between 35.2 degree North and 35.6 degree North latitude and 76.8 degree East and 77.3 degree East longitude with an elevation ranging between 4,000 metre to more than 7,000 metre above mean sea level. To make things clear further, it must be understood that the Siachen ‘valley glacier’ is one to eight kilometre wide and is fed by several tributary glaciers, the two most important being Teram Sher and Lolofond. The Nubra river, which constitutes part of the Indus drainage system, has its origins in the Siachen glacier.
Thus the location of Siachen gives it an indisputable and clear-cut position – under legal, geographical, constitutional and bona fide reasons -within the territorial jurisdiction of Jammu and Kashmir, which is one of the 29 states of “India, that is Bharat”. Understandably, therefore, the main interest, both tactical and strategic, for a nation like India has to be the spot – read Siachen – that is the highest point where India, China, Pakistan and Afghanistan meet. Hence, when India wrested Siachen on April 13, 1984, Pakistan could not complain. Being used to resorting to unprovoked violence and ceaseless aggression on its neighbour’s territory since October 22, 1947 Islamabad, for a change, was paid back in its own coin as India ensconced itself at the advantageous height overlooking adjacent areas in spite of the hazards and weather.
The question now is why is Pakistan so keen to see India withdraw from Siachen, which happens to be part of India’s legal territory? The answer lies in the fact that Islamabad sees Siachen as “un-demarcated”, which means an area that cannot be held or claimed by anyone without first defining the Line of Control beyond NJ-9842, which still stands “un-described, un-defined and un-demarcated”. Accordingly, Siachen lies outside the formally agreed LoC in Jammu and Kashmir but is an integral part of Pakistan’s Northern Areas. It is situated in an area over which Pakistan has “continuous administrative control since 1947”. If one were to use Pakistan’s logic of “continuous administrative control since 1947”, India’s claim over the Kashmir valley, Ladakh and Jammu is foolproof since this area, too, has been under India’s “continuous administrative control since 1947”.
The reality is that in 21st century geopolitics, there cannot simply be any no-man’s land in a land-locked terrain. It has to be a ‘either-yours-or-mine’ scenario. If it is not with India, Siachen would be taken by Pakistan. Remember Kargil 1999? Indian troops had deliberately moved away from the higher altitude to the lower terrain, thereby creating a ‘no-man’s land’ during winter. What happened thereafter? Pakistan filled the vacuum on the sly. India woke up from its slumber but how many did its soldiers die? Today we take pride in Kargil Day. It was victory no doubt but a pyrrhic victory after a monumental command failure that no one talks about these days. Do we want a repeat of Kargil 1999?
It must be kept in mind that although Siachen is a forbidding and difficult terrain, history compels India to station its armed forces there and hold on to the heights. When the 1963 Sino-Pak exchange of territory took place to cause disadvantage to their ‘common enemy, that is India, Jawaharlal Nehru had rightly uttered a word of caution in the Lok Sabha on March 5, 1963: “Pakistan’s Line of actual control… reached the Karakoram pass”. What would be the distance, ‘as the crow flies’, between Siachen and the Karakoram pass connecting China with Pakistan through which the $46 billion China-Pakistan economic corridor will run? One just has to go through a standard geographical atlas to understand the importance of Siachen and the inherent tactical advantage of the ‘heights’ in an area where four countries meet in a forbidding landlocked terrain.
Some forgetful Indians, who have read history but refuse to learn from it, must remember that India’s north-west has been penetrated at least 40 times by foreign invaders. Again it needs to be understood that no sooner than August 15, 1947, when India became independent, it started facing invasion from October 22, 1947. There has been no respite in the invasions that continue unabated to this day.
For India today, holding on to Siachen is not a choice but a compulsion in order to face the eternal reality of an external enemy and the perennial fury of nature. A third enemy seems to have cropped up within – corruption. Only the other day, it was reported that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agents have penetrated the Indian system and are operating through a few men of the establishment, including senior army officers who, because of their corrupt ways, have thus jeopardized the lives of their comrades-in-arms. In this connection, a news report of March 14, 2008 comes to mind. It said that five personnel, including a brigadier, have been charge sheeted by the Jammu and Kashmir Police for allegedly replacing kerosene and diesel in tankers meant for troops in Siachen with water. One feels ashamed to refer to this report but in the light of the death of 10 soldiers of 19 Madras Regiment and the recent corruption cases against army generals, one sincerely hopes that India’s brave soldiers in Siachen will not have the misfortune of facing the enemy both within and without.

Army agrees to return state land by March 31

Army agrees to return state land by March 31
Governor NN Vohra during a meeting in Jammu. A Tribune PHOTO

Tribune News Service

Jammu, March 17

The Army today agreed to hand over vast lands under its possession to the state government before March 31.The decision in this regard was taken during a meeting between Governor NN Vohra Northern Command Chief Lt Gen D S Hooda here today.During the meeting, the Governor reviewed implementation of decisions taken in earlier civil-military liaison conferences in respect of all land matters relating to the Army.After discussions it was agreed that the Northern Command Headquarters would hand over 16.30 acre of state land held by it adjoining the Jammu University campus, 212 acre at the Tatoo Grounds, Srinagar, 456.60 kanal at High Grounds, Anantnag, land held by it at lower Khurba Thang in Kargil to the state government before March 31.Restoration of land under Army’s possession to the state was one of the major points in the “Agenda of Alliance” of the erstwhile PDP-BJP coalition government.In case of land at the lower plateau of Khurba Thang, it was agreed that the matter would be taken up before March 31 when Chief Secretary BR Sharma visits Kargil.The Chief Secretary has been named as the chairman of the committee set up to deal with all Army key location plan matters.Regarding the Tatoo Ground, the Governor and the Army commander will jointly visit the site before March 31 and discuss certain proposals regarding its utilisation.

Governor reviews security

  • Governor NN Vohra on Thursday reviewed internal and external security management issues during a meeting involving civil, police, Army and central Intelligence agencies here. The Governor was informed about the redeployments undertaken to strengthen security management in the aftermath of the Pampore terror attack. The meeting also discussed various important issues relating to the effective enforcement of the counter infiltration and counter terrorism grids along the international border and LoC in the Jammu and Kashmir regions.

Indian Army agrees to vacate large portions of land in Kashmir

Jammu: In a significant development, the Indian Army on Thursday decided to vacate huge portions of land held by it close to civilian habitations in Jammu and Kashmir and hand over the possession to the state government.

An official statement issued here said that “in extensive discussions” with Northern Command chief Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda at Raj Bhavan on Thursday, Governor N.N. Vohra reviewed the implementation of decisions taken in earlier civil military liaison conferences on all land matters relating to the army.

It was agreed that the Northern Command would hand over 16.30 acres adjoining the Jammu University campus, 212 acres at Tatoo Grounds in Srinagar, 456.60 kanals at High Grounds in Anantnag, and also land held at lower Khurba Thang in Kargil.

The land at Khurba Thang would be taken over before March 31 when the chief secretary visits Kargil.

“Regarding the Tatoo Ground land, the governor and army commander will jointly visit the site, before March 31, to also discuss certain proposals regarding the utilisation of this land for creating a park, recreational facilities for youth etc.,” the statement said.

The governor directed that the committee headed by the chief secretary will visit Jammu University, Kargil and Anantnag to fulfill all formalities on the spot and take over the sites.

Vohra also arrived at an understanding with the army commander over the location of high altitude warfare school (HAWS) in Gulmarg. He will have a further meeting with Hooda.

“The meeting also discussed issues relating to the notification of firing ranges at various places. It was decided that the chief secretary shall pursue the pending issues with the ministry of defence, particularly regarding the enhancement of the scales of rent payable for the required areas of land.”

The demand to vacate these lands was high on the list of PDP president Mehbooba Mufti to pave the way for her heading the PDP-BJP coalition government in the state.


Defence Services: whipping boy for the merchants of falsehood

I am not ideologically aligned. I am also not much enthused by the two extremes of the national and anti-national debate since the foundations of India can hardly be shaken by polarized views at both ends. I am not against human rights activists since checks and balances, arguments and counter arguments, make any system more robust. I am even not impressed by retired officers of the military shouting out loud about the ‘sacrifices’ of our uniformed personnel as if other professions have no role to play in the largest democracy. I would say that the milkman who rings your bell every morning is playing an equally important role.

But then, this piece by Kavita Krishnan with a shrill headline talking of ‘Systematic Sexual Violence by the Army’ still makes me queasy. And it is not a random write-up but a drop in a series of such propaganda.

Never the one to defend wrongdoing by uniformed men and women, even by my harsh standards, this tirade mainstreams stray incidents of the past. It broad-brushes an entire organization based on individual aberrations. Should it mean, and I asked this on social media, that tomorrow if a university professor is involved in a theft, we blast off with lines like “Systematic Theft by Teachers”. Or if a Chartered Accountant is involved in an economic offence, “Systematic Fraud by CAs”? No end to such senseless overstretching of logic! How loosely has the word ‘systematic’ been used, where is the data? Where is the empirical backup?

Strange also is the bogey raised time and again by some members of the intelligentsia that the Defence Services let off lightly their personnel accused of crimes. In fact, the opposite is true. Constitutional Courts have time and again reprimanded the Defence Services for awarding punishments that are disproportionate to the offence. We ourselves feel that at times charges are trumped up and exaggerated and a single offence broken up into multiple charges. We have, on the contrary, raised a voice that military law does not meet Constitutional or international norms under the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights for separation of powers. And we say this since we find that though discipline is paramount for the forces, the basic judicial norms are hazy in the military leading sometimes to excessive punishment and a much higher incidence of conviction and punishment than normal rates, arguably in order to ‘set examples’. Military Justice hence needs to be rationalized, but not since it lets off people scot-free as is being wrongly propagated, but since, it, at times, results in harsher punishments than warranted.

Any person who has served in uniform, especially of the Defence Services and the Central Armed Police Forces, would be able to say with certainty that much of the officers’ time in operational areas is spent on sensitizing troops on dealing perceptively with the elderly, women and children. Not just in India, but almost in all democracies. Black sheep, just as they exist in our society, are bound to be found in the uniformed forces, being the extension of the same society.

My request to Ms Kavita Krishnan would plainly be not to scandalize the very delicate issue of crime against women. Such baseless headlining not only results in painting a wrong picture of our forces but also trivializes the very grave matter of sexual violence by giving it a backdrop of falsehood. The only thingsystematic here is the careful surgical maligning of our forces in an irresponsible and unethical manner. Our forces are being projected as some ragtag militia from the middle ages.

But more than that, it demoralizes our men and women in uniform, who are serving in trying circumstances away from their families, but who, unlike Ms Krishnan, rather unlike all of us, do not have the luxury of effectively voicing their opinion or issuing rebuttals or writing opinion pieces and participating in debates. In fact, bound by service regulations, they have no voice at all, which makes them an extremely soft target.

India believes in defence services, not offence services, as some would try to fallaciously project. Do not make them your whipping boy.

Posted by Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singh at 10:02 PM

 

Govt of India issues guidelines on recovery of excess amount from employees

The issue of recovery of excess amount from pensioners and employees has remained quite vexed since the past many years. The problem was compounded with the Supreme Court taking a varied view in various decisions.

Going into great detail of the subject, the Supreme Court in December 2014 however laid down the law quite clearly inStateof Punjab Vs Rafiq Masih wherein certain guidelines were postulated for such cases.

To the credit of the Central Government, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has today issued a universal circular implementing the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in the ibid case.

The circular is significant since it is probably for the first time that a department has floated a universally applicable pro-employee circular in this regard. Though departments are quick in circulating decisions of High Courts and Supreme Court rendered against employees, it is rarely that a similar exercise is conducted when law is laid down in favour of employees or retirees.

The said Office Memorandum issued today, detailing the cases where recovery is impermissible, can be accessed and downloaded by clicking here.

blog pic
Major Navdeep SIngh

Army casts net, villagers cry foul Sirhind canal exercise leaves residents without water; to be removed soon

Army casts net, villagers cry foul
Farmers stand outside the DC office after submitting a memorandum in Bathinda on Tuesday. Tribune photo: Pawan Sharma

Tribune News Service

Bathinda, March 8

About 18 villages here today heaved a sigh of relief after getting an assurance from the Army that it would remove a net from the Bathinda distributary of the Sirhind canal that passes through the Bathinda cantonment.Residents of villages were at loggerheads with the Army in the cantonment that had placed the net in the Bathinda distributary of the Sirhind canal.Panchayats of villages, including Gehri Buttar, Jodhpur Romana, Gehri Bhagi, Mehta, Shergarh, Bhagwangarh, Gurusar Sainewala, Phullomitthi, Sangat Kalan, Jassi Bagh Wali, Kishanpura, Naruana, Jai Singh Wala, Baho Sivian and Meeya today gathered here and approached the Bathinda Deputy Commissioner for the second time to get the issue sorted out.Hamir Singh, sarpanch, Jai Singhwala village, said: “The villages at the tail end, including Jai Singh Wala, Phullow Mithi, Sangat, were facing too much issues as there was no water for irrigation. Shortage of drinking water was also being faced by residents. We have earlier approached the executive engineer but to no avail. However, today the DC had assured to address our grievance.”Executive Engineer (Irrigation) Upkaran Singh said: “Farmers approached us two months ago and we had written a number of times to the Army and had even held meetings with them in this regard but today with the intervention of the DC, the matter has sorted out.”After the Pathankot terror attack, the Army in the Bathinda cantonment put up the net in Bathinda distributary, which used to get blocked after a few hours following waste and weeds gathering around the net. The cleaning of the Sirhind canal is not being done by the Irrigation Department due to lack of funds. However on Tuesday, Bathinda Deputy Commissioner Basant Garg met the GoC, Army Sub Area, Major General Jaggi, who assured to remove the net from the distributary.“I met Maj Gen Jaggi today and discussed the matter. The flow of water was halted due to the waste collected around the net and residents faced problems due to the same. However, Army officials had assured us to remove the net from the canal,” the DC said.


Army erects pontoon bridge for Art of Living extravaganza

NEW DELHI: The Indian Army, which has built a pontoon bridge on the Yamuna for the Art of Living Foundation’s upcoming World Culture Festival, is likely to build one more to ease movement of lakhs of people who are expected to attend the controversy-ridden mega event.

The development came even as there was criticism from some quarters, including the social media, about using Army to build the floating bridge for such an event.

“Lakhs of people are expected to turn up. There is a question of law and order and also fears of stampede. Permission has been granted by concerned authorities to host the event. If a permission has been given, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure everything is run smoothly,” highly placed defence soures told PTI.

They said the organisers had approached the defence ministry seeking six such bridges but the Army was asked to erect only one. A second bridge has been erected by the PWD.

“The Delhi Police has now given a report saying that there are fears of stampede and hence the Army might build another bridge,” the sources said, adding that a Minister from the Delhi government has also written to the Ministry highlighting the need for such bridges.

The sources said defence minister Manohar Parrikar had asked the defence secretary to look into the issue. During his interaction with the Army, the force wondered whether their personnel should be used to help a “private event”.

“The minister was of the view that since permission has been granted, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure everything was fine. The Army, which has the expertise, was asked to step in keeping the larger good of people in mind,” the sources said.

They added that the Army has been used during Kumbh Mela and even the Commonwealth Games.

Told that the event has come under the scanner of the National Green Tribunal, which looks after the environmental issues, sources said the Army is only helping people and it is up to the concerned authorities to grant permission or withdraw it.

President Pranab Mukherjee will not be attending the festival in the wake of controversy over holding the three-day cultural function on the Yamuna flood plains beginning here this Friday.

 Mukherjee had earlier agreed to attend the valedictory ceremony on Sunday.
 While the organisers of the function expect lakhs of people to attend the function, concerns have been raised by experts about the damage to the environment that may be caused as the three-day event was being held on flood plains of the river in east Delhi.
 The National Green Tribunal is hearing a petition which has claimed that the organisers will release ‘enzymes’ into 17 drains that flow into Yamuna for cleaning the river. A judgement is expected tomorrow.

Plans of creating a leaner Indian military sends ripples among the armed forces

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar said Friday that India, with the third largest military in the world (with over 1.3 million soldiers), needs to “cut flab.”

The Indian Army will be the first to adopt the leaner force plan, since it has the largest manpower in the armed forces. “I have asked the Army to identify the areas, it will take time and cannot be done overnight,” Parrikar said, NDTV reports.

Clearing misconceptions following the recent Union Budget 2016, where the defence outlay was not part of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s presentation, Parrikar revealed that the total allocation for defence in the budget was Rs 3,41,000 crore, including defence pensions. Pensions were allocated at Rs 82,000 crore, and for new equipment purchases the Ministry of Defence gets Rs 70,000 crore.

He noted that due to “ill-management” $3 billion was lying unused in an account with the US government for the government-to-government deals between India and US. Parrikar claimed that the ministry “re-calibrated” it and has since brought down the unspent money.

He also added that about Rs 13,000 crore of unspent capital funds will be returned.

Meanwhile, Parrikar’s statement of making the armed forces leaner has created ripples among the jawans, according to The Telegraph.

The report cited senior military officials as saying that armed forces can cut down the manpower but only after induction of new technology. The obsolete technology has increased the workload of the armed forces, pressuring the infantry battalions.

When asked about the Rafale aircraft negotiations, Parrikar called himself a “tough negotiator” who does not reveal his cards. The defence minister cryptically said that he will “cross the bridge when the time comes.”


hero speak

Even for OROP, we didn’t respond like Jats. We are armed forces. We are nationalists and we are not destructive.

Vinod Nebb,

Wing Commander (retd)

Anything against the country is not welcome. These days, superfluous and contrived definitions are in vogue.

BK Bishnoi, Air Vice-Marshal (retd)