All posts by webadmin

Srinagar-Leh highway reopens

Srinagar-Leh highway reopens
An Army convoy passes through the Zojila Pass on Friday. Tribune Photo: Yawar Kabli

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, May 12

After remaining closed for over four months, the Srinagar-Leh national highway was thrown open to vehicular traffic here today.The 434-km-long highway serves an important link between the people of Ladakh and Kashmir and thousands of soldiers stationed in the Ladakh region. The highway traverses through the Himalayas at Zojila pass and then the Zanskar Mountain Range at Fatula to enter into Ladakh.“The challenge was to identify the road alignment when there was huge accumulation of snow,” an officer said.The highway was closed on January 3 and was open today by GOC of the Srinagar-based 15 Corps Lieutenant General JS Sandhu and GOC of the Leh-based 14 Corps Lt Gen PJS Pannu in Zojila. Lt Gen Sandhu complimented the Border Roads Organisation personnel for clearing the highway.


Dagshai school boy tops state in NDA exam

Dagshai school boy tops state in NDA exam
Sameer Sharma

Tribune News Service

Solan, June 19

Sameer Sharma has done the Army Public School, Dagshai, proud by securing the second position in the All-India rankings of the National Defence Academy (NDA) released by the UPSC recently. Sameer, who passed out from the school this year, cleared the NDA in his first attempt.He has also topped among all schools of the state and all Army Public Schools in the NDA. His performance in the Class XII board examination has also been excellent in which he scored 95.2 per cent marks to top the school and he scored a perfect 100 in physics and 98 in IP.The NDA entrance exam was held in September last year and nearly 5 lakh Class XII students had appeared in it.Son of JWO (IAF) Lalit Kumar Sharma, Sameer hails from Mohali. His mother Seema Sharma owns a saloon.He was enrolled in Class VIII of the school. He has won many accolades and prizes of proficiency during his stay. He was also adjudged the Best Student of the Year 2016-17.Principal SK Mishra while terming it as a proud moment for the school said the school had a special cell which not only encouraged students to appear in the NDA but also arranged special classes.Ravi Sharma, in-charge, NDA classes, said a sense of respect and admiration was imbued in the students so that they could join the armed forces.


A Modi show that wasn’t Sandeep Dikshit South Asia satellite — a case of too little, too late

A Modi show that wasn’t
NOT THE ONE: Chinese micro satellite startups seem to have an edge.

IDEALLY, Prime Minister Narendra Modi should have hoped that last week’s launch of the South Asia satellite had the trappings of the ceremony on May 26, 2014, in the forecourt of Rashtrapati Bhavan when, for the first time, most SAARC heads of government came for the swearing-in of an Indian Prime Minister. Contrary to the media buildup, the India-funded and built South Asian satellite might have come too late in the day. The neighbours, with no exception, are wary of South Block’s foreign policy currently supervised by a medley comprising dyed-in-the-wool diplomats, kin of high officials in the Modi government and nominated individuals from the RSS.On the technical side as well, the satellite has too few frills in its antennas to encourage the South Asian heads to once again head to Delhi for a joint photo session with Prime Minister Modi. The satellite’s limited technical specifications (equipped only with Ku band transponders that are good for videos and photos) are further weighed down by the absence of freedom to download whenever or whatever they want to because India is yet to put up satellite ground stations on their respective soils. This means the countries will have to request ISRO for specific images and video feeds. Or the participating countries must work out a sharing protocol with ISRO. This is much like their existing arrangements with commercial satellite companies offering similar services except that the partnership of South Asian countries with ISRO is free of cost but may bring bureaucratic red tape in its wake.The satellite is being touted as a Narendra Modi initiative. Facts tell a slightly different story. It began as a UPA project after the country’s external intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), sounded a series of warnings in late 2012 about the inroads being made into the South Asian space segment by China. If anything, the UPA should be faulted for letting time slip by after the Joint Intelligence Committee weighed the issue in February 2013 and urged ISRO to accelerate its marketing and persuasion efforts. Chinese space companies have started setting up offices in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, the two SAARC countries (besides Pakistan) that are likely to be big consumers of satellite services.Pundits have drawn attention to the geopolitical symbolism of this project in which Pakistan is the only sour note. In other words, they are indirectly admitting that the satellite might not be of much help to the SAARC countries. But its launch does display a unity of purpose in space that has eluded the South Asian neighbours on the ground despite Narendra Modi’s best efforts. India’s pan South Asia barrier-free road travel project first ran aground on Pakistan’s refusal to buy into it. Islamabad’s opposition inadvertently excluded another SAARC member, Afghanistan, from the project because all terrestrial links from India (as well as Bangladesh, Nepal and Bhutan) must go through Pakistan. When Narendra Modi tried to push through the truncated SAARC Motor Vehicles Agreement — renamed BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal) — eternally-loyal Bhutan jumped the ship. Its Parliament refused to endorse the BBIN agreement on the grounds that unruly Indians with their badly maintained vehicles and poor driving skills will cause havoc and pollution on their serene roads. Another major country, Sri Lanka, will also have limited use of the South Asian satellite’s offerings because China has made substantial inroads and is well poised to be Colombo’s premier partner in the space segment. Bangladesh too is unwilling to be tied to the Indian coat-tail in cutting edge areas — nuclear plant, submarines, as also space.This leaves just Bhutan and Maldives who will substantially gain from the satellite but will be modest users. Even Afghanistan currently utilises an old Indian satellite with assistance from the French.Why hasn’t ISRO, which rewrote the world record for simultaneously launching the maximum number of satellites in one go and sent the cheapest-ever mission to Mars, unable to make breakthroughs like the Chinese companies? Is the much-vaunted ISRO expertise concentrated in a narrow segment? The reason may lie in the aftershocks of the Antrix-Devas affair. The latter is the marketing arm of ISRO and it has to pay heavy penalties to the private company Antrix for backing out of a joint venture. The government cancelled the Antrix-Devas contract after the Comptroller and Auditor General found a number of procedural violations. The controversy even claimed the scalp of the then ISRO chairman, Madhavan Nair.ISRO now stands in danger of losing its global preeminent position of being the most cost-effective launcher of micro satellites as Chinese start-up companies are already actively scouring the world for opportunities. ISRO is likely to be attractive only to customers who have security issues with Chinese companies. This means the Western block, and they too have existing tieups for the large satellites where ISRO still has no capability. The problem lies in the Modi government’s inability to come up with a revamped Satellite Communications Policy to replace the 20-year-old version that has licence-permit raj written all over it. Three years after it took power, there is no word whether the BJP government is interested in taking a look at the draft policy left behind by the UPA government. The Chinese are snapping at ISRO’s heels and data rates for satellite communication in India is many times costlier than the tariffs in the US. The time to bite the bullet may well pass India by.From a national security perspective too, India is yet to integrate different policies for space communication, security and remote sensing. The Prime Minister has often spoken of an integrated space in all aspects of policy making. The Joint Doctrine of the armed forces is an example of deeds following words. But it is easier for governments to make the armed forces do its bidding than breaking down walls between civilian departments.That is why South Block is still struggling with an integrated transport policy. But India cannot afford to allow its various users of space to work in silos when the worldwide trend is of integration. The neighbourhood policy is also in disarray. The accent on Hindutva might have made neighbours with a different religious disposition wary of their domestic audience perceiving them as being in too close an Indian embrace. What could have been an occasion to highlight pan-South Asianism has turned out to be a missed opportunity. 


Centenarian ex-serviceman felicitated

Centenarian ex-serviceman felicitated
Capt Jawala Singh Grewal, who turned 100 in April, being felicitated by Major-General Harvijay Singh, Directorate-General of Signals, Army Headquarters, Delhi, in Ludhiana on Sunday. Tribune photo

Tribune News Service

Ludhiana, June 18

Capt Jawala Singh Grewal, who celebrated his 100th birthday on April 1, was enrolled in the Army (Corps of Signals) on February 19, 1937, and he retired from service on April 1, 1972.To felicitate the centenarian, senior officer Major-General Harvijay Singh, Directorate-General of Signals, Army Headquarters, came from Delhi and presented him with a token amount of Rs 1 lakh on behalf of the Indian Army at a small ceremony organised at his residence at Punjab Mata Nagar, Pakhowal Road, in Ludhiana today.On the occasion, the local Army officers also interacted with him and he, in turn, recounted his days in the Army and gave advice on various issues. He expressed satisfaction on various facilities being made available to ex-serviceman and thanked everyone present for the felicitation.The Major-General assured the veteran and his family of all help from the Army and the Corps of Signals fraternity.


India, US officials discuss maritime security cooperation

India, US officials discuss maritime security cooperation
Last month, US Pacific Command Commander Admiral Harry Harris had emphasised on increasing cooperation in between the two countries in the maritime security area. File photo

Washington, May 11

Top Indian and American officials discussed ways to strengthen maritime security cooperation during the two-day India-US Maritime Security Dialogue in Rhode Island.

The officials also reviewed the implementation of the decisions taken at the first Maritime Security Dialogue between the two countries.

According to an official readout of the meeting that ended on Wednesday, “The two sides exchanged views on maritime developments in the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region and considered steps to further strengthen bilateral maritime security cooperation.”

The Indian delegation was led by Joint Secretary (disarmament and international security affairs) Pankaj Sharma while the American delegation was led by David Helvey, the Acting Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian and Pacific Security Affairs.

The next round of the dialogues will take place in India.

Last month, US Pacific Command Commander Admiral Harry Harris had emphasised on increasing cooperation in between the two countries in the maritime security area. — PTI


Infiltration, best countered by Lt Gen (Retd) Syed Ata Hasnain

8

Pakistani militants are fervently trying to gain access through Uri. This is a warning bell to step up counter-terror ops, intelligence — and outreach to Kashmiris

At the best of times, it is difficult to make sense of events in Kashmir as these go from street turbulence and stone-throwing to LoC duels and attempts at infiltration. The last two weeks have witnessed infiltration bids all along the LoC in the Valley zone — in fact, more than I can remember anytime in recent years. The Jammu region is quiet in comparison, with a few exchanges of fire across the LoC in Naushera and Krishna Ghati.

The focus of the infiltration seems to be in the Uri area, followed by the Naugam (Lipa) sector and Machil. This is a pattern witnessed years ago — in 2010, when the street agitation was at its height, efforts were made by Pakistan to infiltrate terrorists to give impetus to the movement, through high-profile acts in the hinterland. There was also an attempt to induct maximum leaders as terrorists without leadership are easy fodder for security forces.

The sudden recourse to infiltration attempts has many reasons. To understand these, a brief explanation of the Pakistani concept is necessary. Those who keep recalling the goodwill of the ceasefire, the four point formula, the peace process with Pakistan, need to shelve all that — the Pakistan we see today is driven by a perception that it has never been strategically stronger — and the situation in Kashmir was never so much in its favour.

However, while the streets may erupt at its bidding, through social media instigation and separatist rabble-rousing, boots on the ground are deficient. The terrorist strength in the hinterland bestows the capability to execute acts which tie the army and other security forces down — and make news. Of the less than 300 terrorists estimated in the Kashmir hinterland, more than half are locals. Pakistan’s handlers have little faith in the capability of local terrorists, Burhan Wani notwithstanding: Emotional fervour when a local terrorist is neutralised is fine — but banking on the passion of locals is something the Pakistani controllers have never relied upon.

In 1991, they infiltrated mercenaries from the Afghan conflict of the 1980s, followed by more Pakistani terrorists after 1996. The generational change, with the rise of new militancy in 2013-16, passed the mantel to local Kashmiri youth, Pakistan’s control slipping marginally.

In 2014-16, Pakistan focused on Jammu, high-profile terror acts, trans-LoC firing and infiltration. Terror acts from within the Valley were of a lower order and the attrition was high. The separatist movement has also virtually come to be localised to just the Valley. The Jammu region and areas north of the Chenab have been peaceful for most of this time.

India’s initial assessment, that a new military leadership in Pakistan may see a change of tone towards the positive, has been belied. In Pakistan under General Qamar Bajwa, the emphasis appears to have returned to the Valley, the centre of gravity, where Pakistan intends to support ongoing street turbulence with hit-and-run operations, small-scale ambushes and terrorist acts. That explains the multiple attempts at infiltration through non-traditional areas. It is also deemed essential to fill up the Valley before the Amarnath Yatra, which offers maximum scope to execute high-profile acts.

Counter-infiltration is one of the most difficult operations — it demands 24×7 vigil and far more troops. It is not just a question of securing the LoC fence, but also of securing our posts against possible rogue actions from border action teams (BATs), responsible for ambushes on some of our patrols. In 2002, the Army inducted thermal imagers for night surveillance. Renewal of this equipment is essential as this is in its last cycle. The more of this equipment, in good shape, the better our counter-infiltration will be.

Intelligence networks deliver quantum results. Even the most mundane information must never be held back: It must reach where it is needed by the fastest means with senior commanders seriously monitoring the response of ground troops.

The Uri sector is witnessing a surge of infiltration efforts through areas which have been quiet for years. The recent discovery of suicide vests on five terrorists killed in the South Jhelum area is a repeat of what was seen with two or more terrorists in the Naushera sector of the Jammu division. This is an interesting development because the proxy conflict has seen many other shades of typical Islamic terrorism the world over — except suicide bombing.

This method will need rabidly radicalised individuals: Pakistan cannot rely on Kashmiris for that, whatever the state of radicalisation in the Valley. However, it can find enough volunteers from its jihad factories. Thus, the importance of effective counter infiltration to prevent a new threat.

Uri offers multiple choices for targeting. The distance, of 46 km to Baramulla, has several army camps, labour sites, the National Hydro Power Corporation campus and frequent army convoys — all these offer lucrative targets. In December 2014, a terror attack on an artillery gun position at Mohora, on the Jhelum road, led to large-scale casualties. Infiltrated groups can travel further inwards, along routes which are difficult to monitor, and reach Rafiabad, where they become part of the Sopore and Baramulla terror grids.

Much depends on the successful ability of the counter-infiltration grid to prevent a surge. There will be leakages, however strong the grid, because there are human and terrain factors which cannot all be countered. Thus, along with these efforts, the outreach and engagement with the people and counter-propaganda efforts must be professional and continuous to make a difference in the campaign to mainstream Kashmir with the rest of India.


In Pak’s civilian-army standoff, it’s roar versus silence

The only thing scarier than the boys at war with the civilians is the boys at war with themselves. Do both sides know how to navigate this new world of the non-takeover and set new rules?

In Pak’s civilian-army standoff, it’s roar versus silence
Bridging the gap: Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif with the army chief Qamar Bajwa. The only thing that divides Pak’s civil and military is India and Afghanistan. Reuters

IT will eventually settle down. Nobody’s taking over, no one’s going home, the original sin wasn’t big enough to justify the ultimate.But the kerfuffle that exploded into crisis has landed us in a new place. And it’s a tricky place all right. Forget the silliness of a chief cornered into lashing out, to prove to his own that he is one of theirs and not beholden to a civilian. To anyone keeping score, the new chief had already begun to walk the path of the decider, not the follower.Civ-mil can be spun many ways, but it really comes down to two things: India and Afghanistan. There’s other stuff that matters, sure, but either the differences aren’t vast or civ and mil have figured out how to share. Like with the US and China. Sure, there’s some chafing and a lot of grumbling and always some elbowing and gouging, but civ and mil aren’t poles apart.They both want Chinese and American largesse, attention and acceptance. Just as importantly, the US and China have figured out how to divide their attention between the civ and mil sides enough to prevent the whole thing from blowing apart. The only thing that really divides civ and mil is India and Afghanistan. And have a look at Bajwa’s record already.On India: Kulbhushan, regular trips to Kashmir, angry speeches and a door kept firmly shut. On Afghanistan: an early, month-long border closure; a new fierceness towards Kabul; and a matter-of-fact acceptance that the Afghan Taliban need to be accommodated. From a policy perspective, Bajwa was already on his way to joining the pantheon of the boys’ heroes.There has been one mistake though, which ended up creating a myth and obscuring a deeper problem. In style at least, Bajwa has cast himself as the anti-Raheel. The predecessor had concentrated power — giving rise to the legend of the Gang of Three, or possibly Five — and embraced a cult of personality.To move away from that the new chief did two things: he lowered his public profile and has allowed more freewheeling — or what passes as freewheeling among the boys — debate and conversation.That inadvertently created the myth outside the military of a chief who may somehow be compromised. It was a silly idea, but it also obscured a more dangerous problem. Beyond a point you don’t want to open up debate, inside the military or about the military. As long as the debate is about putting corrupt politicians in their place and the like, it’s fine. Par for the course in this place, really, and nothing too harmful.But debate has a funny way of wandering off in dangerous, unpredictable directions. What starts off as a harmless demand for corrupt politicians to be kept on a tight leash can end up questioning the theoretical legitimacy of democracy.Or the ideological foundations of the state. Or the physical boundaries and zones of influence of the country. There’s enough kooky ideas out there to suggest that you don’t want folk outside the democratic arena thinking they’re free to suggest and debate the fringe stuff. In a way, thankfully, the chief’s tweet by proxy has reversed much of that.The only thing scarier than the boys at war with the civilians is the boys at war with themselves. The chief’s tweet by proxy has clarified: he’s theirs, he’s the boss and he means business. But the tweet has exposed a new problem. Call it the non-takeover problem. The more upright the chief, the more of a straight shooter, the more his-only-business-is-the-boys kind of chief, the more he’s liberated from the suspicion of harbouring greater ambitions. And being liberated from the suspicion of harbouring greater ambitions means he can say exactly what’s on his mind. Like he did in the Tweet by proxy.Crisis triggered. But then there’s the other side of the non-takeover problem: the civilian knows that too. If one side is liberated to speak its mind because it knows that takeover is not an option, is the other side free to ignore the liberated speaker because it knows takeover isn’t an option? And so the spectacle of the past week — what had been rejected had not been reissued. Just stony silence.And that’s where it gets tricky. Do both sides know how to navigate this new world of the non-takeover and set new rules? In some ways, a draw has already been achieved. One side roared, the other side didn’t blink. Both have something to carry off to their constituencies and mollify the ego. The boys have their new king, the civilians have their survivor — maybe a bit messy, but messy is what we do best.If the draw is accepted, it could be a new rule of sorts — but a highly unstable one. Roar versus silence can work the first time round. But a draw the first time round will affect the next round — there’ll be pressure for the roar to be louder and a draw not to be settled for.On the other side, there could be a temptation to provoke a louder roar or to retaliate when roared at. Silence is the hardest move of all. The other option is to accept that a highly public draw was a bad idea — that one side should not have roared and that the other side should not have poked. But if they knew how to cooperate, we wouldn’t have civ-mil to begin with. The thought of a four-term Prime Minister and a year-and-a-half-old chief with this mutual baggage is an unsettling one.By arrangement with the Dawn.


Muslims flay Pak for killing Indian soldiers

Muslims flay Pak for killing Indian soldiers
Muslims, led by the Nayab Shahi Imam of Punjab, Maulana Usman Rehmani, burn an effigy of Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in Ludhiana to condemn the beheading of Indian soldiers by the Pakistani army in Jammu and Kashmir. Tribune Photo: Himanshu Mahajan

Our Correspondent

Ludhiana, May 5

Condemning the brutal and dastardly act of Pakistani army against Indian soldiers, a large number of Muslims, led by the Nayab Shahi Imam of Punjab, Maulana Usman Rehmani, raised slogans against the neighbouring nation and burnt an effigy of Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.Speaking on the occasion, Rehmani said the mutilation of dead bodies of Indian Army jawans by the Pakistani army, had exposed the real face of Pakistan and its evil designs to create instability in India, especially Jammu and Kashmir. “Pakistan cannot get away with this kind of inhuman acts. Indian army will give a befitting reply to this provocative action,” he said.The Nayab Shahi Imam urged the Government of India to stop all kinds of dialogue with the neighbouring country and go for army action. “Talk to Pakistan in the language that it understands,” Rehmani stressed.He said members of the Muslim community would stand by their Hindu, Sikh and Christian brethren at this critical juncture. “We might have some political differences with the government, or for that matter members of other communities but, when it comes to solidarity and unity of India, we are all one,” he added.Rehmani asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to teach Pakistan a lesson for mutilating dead bodies of the India soldiers, which was more important. The issue of ‘triple divorce’ (teen talaq) could be sorted out later, he said.

Cable operators can be taken to task for airing Pak channels

New Delhi, May 5

The Centre today said the local administration in Kashmir had the right to confiscate the equipment of cable operators allegedly airing unauthorised Pakistani channels and take action against them.Stating that the government had sent an advisory, Union Minister Rajyavardhan Rathore said such advisories were regularly sent by the Centre on unauthorised channels.“Whenever such news comes up, it is our duty to ask for a report. Action is being taken in the matter,” he said.Rathore said it was the responsibility of the local administration to monitor unauthorised channels in their area and they had the right to take action against such channels.“In Kashmir, the district collector or the authorised government official can confiscate the equipment and take action against cable operators,” he said while speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an event here.The minister was responding to reports that over 50 Saudi and Pakistani channels besides Zakir Naik’s banned ‘Peace TV’ and others indulging in ‘anti-India’ propaganda were allegedly running without necessary clearances via private cable networks in Kashmir. — PTI


Ultras strike in Op Clean-up Civilian killed, 2 soldiers hurt in Shopian; locals resort to stone-throwing

Ultras strike in Op Clean-up
Army personnel take position during a search operation in Shopian and Pulwama on Thursday. Tribune Photo: Mohd Amin War

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, May 4

Militants attacked an Army patrol at Kellora village in Shopian today, leaving a civilian dead and three personnel injured, hours after the security forces had concluded a massive search operation in the district to flush out militants believed to be holed up inside homes.Hizbul militants opened fire on a patrol of 62 Rashtriya Rifles. “A civilian (driver) and two Army personnel were injured. The driver, Nazir Ahmed, died later in hospital,” a police official said. The militants struck when the troops were carrying out a “reverse sweep” of Chowdari Gund and Kellora villages this evening. “Reverse sweep” is a term used by the Army to describe a surprise check of a location combed earlier.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Engaging 3,000 police, Army and CRPF personnel, the forces carried out searches in 20 villages of Shopian district, including Turkwangam and Sugan, where militants have recently been seen moving around freely.“Operation Clean-up”, launched after a spate of militant attacks in the area, and perhaps the biggest in more than a decade in the troubled Kashmir valley, was launched at 3 am, with forces on the ground backed by helicopters and drones. It ended at 2 pm. Door-to-door searches, a practice stopped in the late 1990s, were conducted. Villagers were asked to assemble at a common place and their houses thoroughly searched. There were reports of locals attacking policemen with stones in Turkawangam village. Jawans retreating after the searches too were stoned at various places.“Searches were carried out in areas where militants have been sighted shooting videos to lure local youths to militancy. Recently, a video showing 30 militants armed with rifles was shot in the area,” said a security officer. Post Hizb commander Burhan Wani’s death in an encounter last year, Shopian has witnessed several  violent incidents. In February this year, militants ambushed an Army patrol, killing three soldiers and wounding five. 


Beheading warrants unequivocal response, India tells Pakistan

Pak rejects India’s claim on beaheading, says will respond to any misadventure

Beheading warrants unequivocal response, India tells Pakistan
Naib Subedar Paramjit Singh From Tarn Taran in Punjab and (R) BSF Head Constable Prem Sagar From Deoria in Uttar Pradesh

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, May 2

Army Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) Lt Gen AK Bhatt on Tuesday told his Pakistan counterpart Maj Gen Sahir Shamshad Mirza that mutilation of bodies of Indians warranted unequivocal response.Using the word ‘unequivocal’, which means unambiguous, was like a warning to Pakistan that India would respond. On Monday, two Indian soldiers, one from the Army and one from the BSF, had died and their bodies mutilated in a military action by Pakistan in the Krishna Ghati sector along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Lt Gen Bhat termed the mutilation (beheading) as a dastardly and inhuman act. “It is beyond the norms of civility and merits unequivocal condemnation and response.”Lt Gen Bhat told the Pakistan DGMO that “full fire” support was provided by Pakistan Army located in the vicinity.He rejected claims made by Pakistan Army on Monday which had said that its troops were not involved in mutilation of Indian soldiers.“Pakistan troops targeted Indian Army patrol on the Indian side of the LC (military usage for LoC) and mutilated bodies of the Indian soldiers,” Lt Gen Bhat told his counterpart in Pakistan. The Indian Army tweeted the full text of the statement.He also spoke about presence of border action team training in the vicinity of the LoC.On Monday night, local commanders’ level hotline contact was established at Rawalkot-Poonch sector on the LoC.

Pak rejects India’s claim on beheading, says will respond to any misadventure

Meanwhile Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) issued a statement from Rawalpindi saying, “The DGMO, Pakistan Army, Maj Gen Sahir Shamshad Mirza rejected baseless and unfounded Indian allegations of mutilation of Indian Army soldiers’ bodies by Pakistan Army.”The DGMO asked for actionable evidence and cautioned his Indian counterpart saying any misadventure from India would be appropriately responded at a place and time of its own choosing.The issue was discussed during a hotline contact between the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of Pakistan and India this morning to defuse the tension.Pakistan DGMO Maj Gen Sahir Shamshad Mirza told his Indian counterpart Lt Gen A K Bhatt that neither ceasefire violations occurred in the Sector (pointed out by India in the mutilation allegation), nor crossing of the LoC by Pakistanis troops have taken place.The Pakistani statement said the DGMO, Pakistan Army, highlighted that Pakistan Army is a professional military outfit and upholds the highest standards of conduct.“Allegations of mutilation are India’s attempt to divert the attention of world from situation in the Valley,” it said.