Sanjha Morcha

All posts by webadmin

Cadre review in Army under contemplation: Lt Gen Mathson

Our Correspondent

Jaipur, July 19

On the issue of changing the 200-year-old British-established military ranks’ nomenclature, the South Western Army Commander GOC-in-Chief Lt General Cherish Mathson on Thursday said there was a review going on and nothing has been decided yet though “we are all to offer our recommendations to the army”.”It is a process that has started, and as and when its decided, it will be promulgated in Army,” Mathson told media at high tea after inaugurating a two-day “Defence Correspondents Course” here. Asked about cadre review, especially of Colonel to Major General at the time of retirement, he said, “It is just a thought process at this moment. It is under a deliberation state. We are to offer our recommendations. Let it come to a shape.” Recently, in defence circles in Delhi, an Indian Army internal note said the minimum rank for officers at the time of retirement should be Major General. It has suggested the number of regular commissioned officers to be reduced, the rank of Brigadier be done away with while quicker promotions be given to all officers.On Army’s idea of abolishing cantonments mooted recently, the Commander said, “I do not think there would be any problem in it. Many areas in Nasirabad and Ambala have been exercised for the use of the civilians. I am very much in favour-that is what highest level has considered.”On stone-pelting incidents in Kashmir, Lt Gen Mathson said the forces could not reply to stone throwers and it is the civil administration and the government’s responsibility to control this. Though this has been brought under control now, he claimed.On enemy country’s social media warfare against India on borders, he said the younger generation has got an inclination toward such fake news, views or messages. “Very important thing is that we should all identify such fake news affecting us. We need to control it on social media too.”


Kargil war: Pak onslaught on fragile ecosystem

Arun Joshi

My thoughts were thrown back to the Kargil war of 1999 as I stood in front of War Memorial in Drass — the second coldest place in the world after Siberia that had borne the maximum brunt of the nearly two-month-long conflict. An officer of the Indian Army was narrating the tales of incredible valour of the soldiers who sacrificed their “today for our tomorrow”. The Indian Army had scripted a fresh chapter in mountain warfare. Tiger and Tololing hills bear a testimony to that.The Pakistan army had broken an “unwritten agreement” by intruding and capturing the abandoned 400 Indian posts during the winter of 1998-1999 covering a 150-km stretch overlooking critical portions of the Srinagar-Leh highway with the geostrategic objective of cutting off the Indian access to the Siachen glacier — reckoned as the highest battlefield of the world at a height ranging between18,000 feet and 21,000 feet.This is called treachery. But, what happened thereafter is a bigger treachery that Pakistan committed with humankind. The Indian Army was forced to set up a new corps — 14 Corps — and station its troops on the trans-Himalayan heights ranging from 14,000 feet to 18,000 feet. Pakistan also stationed its troops at the heights on their side after facing a humiliating defeat in its misadventure. With so much interference on the Himalayan heights where so many glaciers rested untouched became routes of all-terrain vehicles. The results are there for all to see. The glaciers have receded and the water flow has diminished in rivers.Had the Pakistan army not done what it did, the size and the glory of the glaciers would have stayed as they were in 1999. Pakistan is guilty of unleashing this disastrous situation. And, it sounds absurd when Pakistan leaders accuse India of choking the natural flow of waters to their side.The years since 1999 have taken a toll on the environment. This is a cause-and-effect phenomenon and the climate change worsened the situation. Thousands of toxic smoke-emitting vehicles on both sides of the Line of Control that divides Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan carry arms, ammunition and ration by passing through a fragile ecosystem. Thousands of troops of India and Pakistan now remain stationed at the heights throughout winter. This situation of increased human interference with nature is the creation of Pakistan 19 years ago.Earlier, there was no such interference when nature would replenish the glaciers with heavy snowfall.Pakistan has a lot of explaining to do and also to tell the people of this state that why it undertook that misadventure that led to permanent interference with nature. What is happening on this side of the LoC is happening in Gilgit-Baltistan on the other side of the dividing line, too.The temperatures are unacceptably high. There is a danger of the temperatures going still higher.It is a scientifically proven fact that diesel vehicle emissions are unhealthy for the environment. Its soot and particles pollute the air and damage the forests. It is dreadful to imagine the damage the multiplication of such vehicles has caused to the fragile environment since 1999. It is continuing.All wars are bad, but what Pakistan did in 1999 inflicted environmental disaster on the generations to come. The glaciers are receding in these Himalayan heights, and the day is not far when the whole of Pakistan would curse the architects of the Kargil intrusion. Parched fields and shortage of drinking water have already become a reality.


J&K police tells Supreme Court AFSPA does not prohibit registration of an FIR against Army personnel

An Army officer, Major Aditya Kumar, was named in a complaint over the shooting of three civilians in Shopian in January.

J&K police tells Supreme Court AFSPA does not prohibit registration of an FIR against Army personnel

In an affidavit filed with the Supreme Court on Friday, the Jammu and Kashmir police defended the registration of a first information report against an Army unit over the deaths of three civilians in Army firing in South Kashmir’s Shopian district in January. It contradicted the stand taken earlier by the government of India.

During a hearing before the apex court in March, Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Union government, had said that under Section 7 of the Jammu and Kashmir Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, no FIR can be lodged against Army personnel without the prior sanction of the Union government. The three-judge bench ordered a stay in the investigations, while noting that “Major Aditya is an Army officer and cannot be treated like ordinary criminals by the J&K police.”The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act gives the military sweeping powers to search and arrest, and to open fire if they deem it necessary for “the maintenance of Public Order”, and to do so with a degree of immunity from prosecution.

In its affidavit, the Jammu and Kashmir Police pointed out that the Code of Criminal Procedure calls for the compulsory registration of FIRs in cases of cognisable offences. “No person-specific or class-specific exception is carved out in this principle to exclude any individual or class of persons against whom FIR should not be registered in a case where information of a cognisable offence is prima facie disclosed,” the affidavit said. “The concerned police officer is duty bound to register the FIR.”

Responding to allegations that the police was functioning under political pressure, the affidavit states that no material had been presented that could ascertain the police’s lack of fairness in the probe. “It is false and vehemently denied that the police agencies are influenced by extraneous agencies or political entities or were non functioning or that there was voluntary omission or inaction on part of any civil authority,” it said.

The Shopian shooting

On January 27, residents of Shopian’s Ganowpora village clashed with personnel of the Indian Army after the Army sought the removal of flags associated with the Islamic State from the house of a slain militant.The Army claimed it had opened fire in self-defence. Residents of the village, however, offered a different version of events. They claimed that stone pelting had broken out around 11 am that day, bringing soldiers from a nearby 44 Rashtriya Rifles camp to the spot, and that the soldiers had retreated soon afterwards. Later, residents claim, soldiers returned in greater numbers and resorted to firing from within Army vehicles, killing two civilians. A third man later died of his injuries in hospital.

An FIR filed by the police in January mentioned a Major Aditya Kumar as being head of the unit that opened fire on civilians. The FIR was initially registered under sections dealing with murder, attempt to murder and acts endangering life. After the Army responded with its version of events, the police added sections dealing with rioting with weapons, unlawful assembly, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, mischief causing damage to property, and punishment for attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life, or imprisonment.

The investigation was being conducted by a deputy superintendent of police in Shopian.

Kumar’s father, Karamveer Singh, moved the Supreme Court against the FIR, invoking the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act. The police now “vehemently denies the unfounded and baseless apprehensions and allegations pleaded in the writ petition claiming that justice will not be done”. It said that Singh’s petition was devoid of merit and deserved to be dismissed.

‘Not a determination of guilt’

The affidavit states that the FIR did not arraign Kumar and that an investigation by the police “does not violate any fundamental right of any person, not even that of an accused, much less of a stranger to the investigation proceedings”.

The affidavit also points to observations made by the Supreme Court on Section 7 of the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act in 2012, in the Pathribal fake encounter case. Drawing on that case, the affidavit stated that “even under the AFSPA, the Army Act or under any other law in force, there is no prohibition of registration of FIR against an army personnel or a requirement to seek a sanction prior to registration of a FIR against an army personnel”.

The police also defended its action by arguing: “The registration of FIR is not a determination of guilt against any party. It is merely the starting point of investigation to ascertain the true and correct facts relating to a cognisable offence and to ascertain whether a cognisable offence has actually been committed or not.”

It also argued that not investigating a charges of cognisable offence “would constitute a serious breach of the relevant statutory provisions” as well as violate the victims’ right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Widening the debate

Also on Friday, a separate application filed in the Supreme Court by the Jammu and Kashmir government’s counsel, Shoeb Alam, seeks to make four North Eastern states where the Armed Forces Special Powers Act is in place “parties to the present proceedings”.

“As on date the Armed Forces Special Powers Act is applicable in the states of Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Jammu & Kashmir,” the application said. “Reopening this settled issue and the re-examination of the 2012 Judgment will require the aforesaid states to be heard since the powers of the police in these states in regard to registration of FIR against army personnel involved in cognisable offences will be directly affected. The aforementioned states, thus are necessary parties to the present proceedings.”

It then proceeded to suggest that all states in India may be involved in the discussion, “since the powers of the police of all states in regard to registration of FIR against army personnel involved in cognisable offences may be directly affected”.

Support our journalism by subscrib


Air Force music band performs at CT Institute

Jalandhar, august 10

For the first time in Punjab, 21 members of the Indian Air Force, Adampur, musical band performed patriotic songs in an auditorium at the CT Group of Institutions, Shahpur campus, to mark 72nd Independence Day.Dressed in their professional uniforms, the officers enthralled audience the audience of about 1,000 persons. With various patriotic numbers, the two- hour performance began with the motivational words of the Flight Lieutenant Uday Kiran who was accompanied by Managing Director CT Group, Manbir Singh, Campus Director Dr GS Kalra and Abhishek Soni, Deputy Director, Center for Career, Planning and Counselling (CCPC).Flight Lieutenant Uday Kiran said, “Music has always been a part of the defence culture, strengthening the mood, and inspiring officers to move forward. The IAF has a strong tradition of its own when it comes to military music and musicians. Our band has performed at various places in the country and even in abroad. Today, we performed live for the first time in Punjab.”—TNS


Minister says ‘jointness dear to PM’s heart’. IAF tells us why theatre command not workable

An IAF position paper instead recommends strengthening of joint operations command, says integrated theatre commands will be a strain on resources.

New Delhi: The Indian Air Force (IAF) has recommended the strengthening of the joint operations command (JOCOM) for better synergy among India’s military services, arguing that this would do away with the need for integrated theatre commands (ITC).

The IAF has argued that the integrated theatre commands would strain its resources, according to a position paper read by ThePrint.

This comes days after defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the government wanted the military to move towards creating theatre commands.

“We want a bottom-up approach, create the base and then add layers to it, that way it will not be top-down,” she said at a press conference Friday, adding that the “issue of jointness is very dear to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s heart”.

The IAF position was circulated within the military and the political leadership first in August last year but it has now gained greater currency since a serving navy officer, Rear Admiral Monty Khanna, wrote in a paper for the military think-tank Centre for Joint Warfare Studies (CENJOWS), alleging that the IAF had a “hidden agenda” in opposing theatre commands.

The IAF has taken offence to the paper in which the Rear Admiral, a chief instructor with the Defence Services Staff College in Wellington, has alleged that the IAF was opposing theatre commands as it was intent on keeping avenues for promotions of its senior officers.

While the JOCOM comprises the chiefs of the armed forces or commanders designated by them to synergise operations, an ITC would essentially be helmed by a theatre commander (from any of the three armed forces) and would include within it a land forces component, a maritime forces component and an air component.

In an ITC, operational commanders at the field-level would ultimately report to the theatre commander irrespective of service. The JOCOM would maintain the independence of each service that would continue to report to the respective service chief. 

Only integrated service’

In its position paper against the ITCs, the IAF has argued that it is the only service that is integrated, bottom-up, with each of the other two armed forces (navy and army). It has stated that its assets were always readily available to the other services, including after the terror attacks at the Pathankot Air Force Station in January 2016, and after the Uri attack, when it was involved in the conduct of the September 2016 “surgical strikes”.

The IAF has further argued that since its mandate is to guard India’s territorial integrity and airspace — meaning that it is not essentially an ‘expeditionary’ force (operating way beyond the homeland) such as that of the US— a JOCOM would facilitate the distribution of its limited assets depending on the contingency. The JOCOM technically exists even today but, the IAF has argued, it must meet at least once a month in peacetime and more often depending on the exigency.

One IAF official told ThePrint that its latest Gagan Shakti exercise had tested the concept of distributing assets in three contingencies: a live western border (with Pakistan); a live northern border (with China) and with both borders being live. It swung aircraft and other platforms from the west to the east and to the north.

This was possible because of the very nature of the air force (any air force) that is mandated to guard a largely contiguous territory such as India’s, the IAF has argued. A single Hercules C-130 aircraft has flown the land borders of India in a single day without requiring to land. (It was fuelled in mid-air). “The IAF does not feel that it is constricted by space,” said the officer.

‘Surprised that Admiral went public’

The officer said it was surprising that the Navy Admiral had chosen to go public with what is essentially a “churning and head-banging within the military” on a professional issue of force restructuring and command authority “when there are service rules against doing so.”

The IAF has also repeatedly pointed out that it needs more assets. The 32 squadrons (and dwindling) of fighter aircraft that it currently has is not enough for its mandate. There is a reason why the IAF has been authorised 42 squadrons “and that is to fulfil our mandate”, explained the officer.

“It is because we can decide where and when and which platform to deploy that maintaining integration with the navy and the army at all levels is important to us. We are not against jointness. But we do not favour the imposition of foreign concepts like the ITC (Integrated Theatre Commands) whose operational value in our environment is suspect,” said the officer.

 


Dhyan Chand’s statue faces neglect in Kasauli

Dhyan Chand’s statue faces neglect in Kasauli

Tribune News Service

Solan, August 11

Major Dhyan Chand’s statue in Kasauli cantonment is facing neglect. It seems that the authorities did not have time to fix the damaged hockey stick, which has a white tape around it.Though the structure, named after him in 2015, catches the fancy of visitors, the white tape looks like a blot.An inscription bearing a brief history about this three-time Olympic gold medal winner has also been placed below the statue.“It is appalling to note that the authorities have no time to repair the hockey stick. Rather they have chosen to undo the damage,” said Raman Aggarwal, a tourist. He said this was an insult to the iconic player who had brought laurels to the nation through his legendary game.Junior engineer, cantonment board, Satish Kumar, said it would be rectified soon as it had not been brought to their notice, adding that the statue was installed to give respect to the hockey player who was also an Army Major.The cantonment board has undertaken a slew of measures to beautify the town by installing plaques of about 12 Param Vir Chakra awardees from Major Dhyan Chand Chowk till the Sunset Point on the upper Mall.


Firearms on file A database for gun licences is needed

Firearms on file

THE Centre’s move to launch a National Database of Arms Licences is a positive step in curbing the misuse of arms. It would assist law enforcement agencies in identifying weapons used for criminal activities as well as those involved in so-called “accidental” shootings like celebratory firing. Such incidents have become more common in the recent past. Firearm ownership is a privilege in our country and with it comes the responsibility to take care of the weapon, ensure its security and that of the people. Indeed, getting an arms licence is always a tough task. India has the distinction of having some of the most stringent gun laws in the world, but lack of a shared database made it difficult to keep track of licensed weapons, or to identify one if it is used in a crime. The issuance of unique identification numbers to gun owners, and the centralised, computerised database would streamline the process of tracking the ownership of weapons. The lead time given to gun owners is sufficient, and the system should be able to roll out by April next year. India has the notable distinction of being one of the toughest nations to get a gun licence in. This has allowed the country to keep a check on owners of licensed weapons, even as the security forces fight to keep illegal arms under check. While the authorities are required to establish the need for a gun before issuing a licence, there have been cases of persons of dubious character being issued gun licences. The unique identification number assigned to gun owners and the simple fact of all the data being computerised and available will also help in weeding out undesirable elements. Civilised societies do not need gun-wielding citizens. If some are licensed to carry arms, they must be open to scrutiny and checks by appropriate government agencies.


Pakistani polls, India’s stakes by Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain

Pakistani polls

The growing clout of deep state, coupled with a debt-ridden economy, spells doom for Islamabad

India and Pakistan observe each other’s national elections with much interest because national government formation means policy review and reformulation, which, in their mutual context, involve the handling of the none-too-peaceful relations between the two countries. Pakistan has the advantage because of India’s transparent, tested and respected democratic process through which transition occurs and yet brings near-continuity in policy. For India, there is nothing predictable or transparent about Pakistan with even the outcome of the electoral process contingent upon the Pakistan Army’s interests. With the upcoming elections on July 25, 2018, there should be much interest among Pakistan-watchers as the juncture is critical, with several events and trends occurring simultaneously.

Interestingly, in less than two weeks of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey-listing Pakistan, Hafiz Saeed, the head of Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) has made it known that a couple of hundred candidates owing allegiance to JuD will participate in the election. His earlier attempt at political legitimacy by forming the Muslim Milli League (MML) had come a cropper as it was turned down by the Pakistan Election Commission. He has now entered into an agreement between MML, the front group, and Allah-O-Akbar Tehreek, an Islamist party on whose back MML will ride. Almost on the day of the FATF meeting, Pakistan also removed Muhammad Ahmed Ludhianvi, the head of Ahl-e-Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ), from the designated terror list, clearing it hereafter to also participate in the elections. The ASWJ is another front for the Sipah-e-Sahaba, a virulently anti-Shia group, which is banned and was targeted under Operation Radd-ul-Fasaad. Historically, the Pakistani electorate has never inclined itself towards supporting any of the radical Islamic groups in the past. Is there a change in the offing? There has been little commentary in India on the orientation of Pakistan’s civil society which is known to be extremely weak, pliable and incapable of dictating any discourse for the future. Judging by the turn out at various sit-downs to paralyse the government in the recent past and the quality of people who thronged there, it did appear that the ghost of Mumtaz Qadri (the radical Islamist killer of late Punjab Governor Salman Taseer) continues to rule the roost. A different result at the polls could thus be on the cards. That could also be at the behest of the Pakistani Army and possibly even the higher judiciary.

How has the above situation come to be? It was clear that the Generals were unhappy with former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif whose agenda of peace with India and promotion of trade was not in congruence with the Pakistan Army’s intent. The latter’s ambition and aim since 1977 (the coming of Zia-ul-Haq) has been to seek retribution against India through means foul or fair. Pakistan-friendly terror organisations such as the LeT (JuD) have been and continue to remain strategic assets that calibrate a hybrid proxy war against India especially in J&K, with intent to wrest the latter. The two mainstream parties, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) may have earlier played ball with the Army but have usually been reluctant partners. The infamous ISI and a pliable higher judiciary ensured Sharif’s downfall and eventual ban. Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) even without a national presence is now willing to play along with the Army in the next experiment. The shortfall in national political mainstream footprint is being probably attempted through fillers such as the radical political parties. Husain Haqqani puts it across as – “Their approach is similar to the one used to advance Sharif’s career against Benazir Bhutto in the late 1980s and early 1990s”.

Pragmatic political assessment points at a potential victory of PML-N with reduced numbers but various other activities on the political canvas of Pakistan appear to point towards an Army-assisted PTI victory. Imran Khan is willing to bend over backwards to arrange that. The Pakistani media, otherwise splendidly pro-active and critical, has been under intense pressure. The leading newspaper Dawn has been banned from various military garrisons.

Government and commercial advertising has also been withheld from many media houses, under pressure.

So what should India expect? First, whatever be the election results, it will be the Pakistani army in charge, even more than ever before. In India we had assessed a Qamar Bajwa-led Pakistani army being more rationale and setting the stage for a better environment; the much-touted Bajwa Doctrine. Instead, Pakistan is set to become a basket case; the second borrowing of a billion US dollars from China has just been done to bail it out from the financial mess it finds itself in. Earlier at least, Sharif somewhat resisted the Army pressure and recently even questioned the reasons why Mumbai was attacked and its chief perpetrator not prosecuted. With Imran Khan, the radicals and the Pakistan Army/ISI in the deep state will find new constituents and sink to even greater depth. How much backing this has from China is not known but it will surely be unhappy to see the entry of more radicals and a greater instability, although debt-trap diplomacy is almost assured over the China Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Hare-brained and crazy ideas have emanated from Pakistan in the past even when mainstream political parties with a semblance of political control existed. Now with a potentially deadly combination guiding the nation’s future, Pakistan appears headed for hara-kiri both externally and internally. The US should be worried, as should be Russia and Iran. Entrapped in debt, Pakistan will be vulnerable to manipulation by the Saudis who internally may project new moderation but externally the hemming of Iran from the East through radical Sunni ideology is too tempting. J&K in turmoil, fuelled by radical ideology, remains vulnerable with more violence on the cards. The one hope on which sanity can still rely is the feasibility of free elections under the Pakistan Election Commission and the choice of the Pakistani electorate remaining what it always was, non-radical parties; notwithstanding the popularity of the army. In a real world that is hoping against hope.

The author commanded the 15 Corps in Jammu and Kashmir. Views expressed are personal.


IAF Recruitment 2018: Apply online for 192 Short Service Commission Officer posts on afcat.cdac.in

ndian Air Force has invited online applications for recruitment of IAF Short Service Commission Officer posts. Interested and eligible candidates can apply to the IAF Recruitment 2018 online on afcat.cdac.in.

IAF Recruitment 2018 at 192 SSC Officer posts; Image Credits: careerindianairforce.cdac.in

IAF Recruitment 2018 at 192 SSC Officer posts; Image Credits: careerindianairforce.cdac.in

Indian Air Force Recruitment 2018: Indian Air Force has invited online applications for recruitment at IAF Short Service Commission Officer posts. The courses for grant of Short Service Commission in Flying branch and permanent commission and SSC in Ground duty, technical and non-technical branches. Also, interested and eligible candidates can apply to NCC special entry scheme and Meteorology branch on the official website, afcat.cdac.in. Steps and direct link for the same have been given below. The last date to apply to IAF Recruitment 2018 for SSC officer posts is July 15, 2018. Online examination will be conducted on 18 Aug 18 and 19 Aug 18 for AFCAT exam.

There are 76 vacancies available in Ground duty, technical department, 42 posts in Flying branch, 40 posts in non-technical Ground duty. For NCC special entry, 10 per cent seats out of CDSE vacancies for Flying branch are available. 24 non-technical ground duty posts are available in the Meteorology branch. Direct link to the official AFCAT notification has been given here.

Check Instructions for AFCAT 02/2018 here. The training programme is scheduled to begin in the first week of July  2019 for all courses at Air Force Academy, Dundigal, Hyderabad. The duration of training for  Non-Technical Ground Duty Branches is 52 weeks and that of Flying and Technical  Ground  Duty Branches is 74  weeks at Air Force Training Establishments. PAN Card and an account in SBI or a nationalised bank are compulsory at the time of joining Indian Air Force Academy. Also, Aadhaar Card is mandatory at the time of registration.

 


Gangsters ‘could target’ Op Bluestar veterans

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, July 2In what could pose a threat to several retired Army officers, gangsters in Punjab are reportedly looking to kidnap or target those who participated in Operation Bluestar in June 1984.Intelligence agencies have informed the Army that some of its officers who were part of the operation—launched to flush out armed militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar—could still be serving. In the past few years, names of several gangsters have cropped up in Punjab Police records of having links with foreign-based organisations.General AS Vaidya, who was the Army Chief during Operation Bluestar, was gunned down near his house in Pune in 1986. Lt Gen KS Brar (retd), who was then (as a Maj Gen) leading the operation, survived a knife attack by youth in London in October 2012. Four people have been convicted for the same.Another senior officer who was part of the operation, Lt Gen Ranjit Dyal, the then Chief of Staff, Western Command—died of age-related causes in January 2012. The local gurdwara in Panchkula refused to conduct his final prayers and the Army then provided a Sikh priest at his home. Gen K Sundarji, former Army Chief who was then the Western Army Commander, died in 1999.Some of the Army officers who were young Lieutenants or Captains in 1984 are still serving while a majority of officers have retired. Some of them have been provided security by the local police whereever they live. Others just maintain a low profile and don’t discuss their role in Operation Bluestar even in private.Former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, during whose tenure the operation was carried out, was killed by her guards in October 1984. In December 1999, her daughter-in-law and then Congress president Sonia Gandhi visited the Golden Temple and expressed ‘deep anguish’ and regretted the 1984 happenings. Each year in June, a ‘Ghallughara (meaning massacre) week’ is observed.