All posts by webadmin

HONORARY COMMISSION CAPTAIN

ARMOURED CORPS

1 JC242311Y RIS MAJ & HONY LT SUKHBIR SINGH 
2 JC243078H RIS MAJ & HONY LT BALWAN SINGH 
3 JC242645N RIS MAJ & HONY LT NIRMAL SINGH 
4 JC242692L RIS MAJ & HONY LT TULSI RAM YADAV 
5 JC243331Y RIS & HONY LT HARWINDER SINGH 
6 JC242368N RIS MAJ & HONY LT SANTONU GHOSH 
7 JC243137K RIS MAJ & HONY LT AMARJIT SINGH 
8 JC242711L RIS MAJ & HONY LT GOPISETTY VENKATASYAM

REGIMENT OF ARTILLERY

9 JC269426W SUB MAJ & HONY LT ANIL KUMAR SINGH 
10 JC268092A SUB MAJ & HONY LT BAHADUR SINGH 
11 JC267632F SUB MAJ & HONY LT DINESH KUMAR 
12 JC267622X SUB MAJ & HONY LT G RAVI 
13 JC270912A SUB MAJ & HONY LT JAMINI GOSWAMI 
14 JC270204N SUB MAJ & HONY LT JOGI NAGESWARA RAO 
15 JC267736H SUB MAJ & HONY LT MAHADEO ROY 
16 JC269694A SUB MAJ & HONY LT PARTHABA SAHU 
17 JC263378L SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAJENDAR SINGH 
18 JC269525Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAJENDRA BALKRISHNA 
                                                BAWANKULE 
19 JC269523N SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAJESH KUMAR BHARDWAJ 
20 JC270096P SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAMESH KUMAR 
21 JC269668Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAMESH SINGH PAL 
22 JC270433Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT SAMPURAN SINGH 
23 JC269242X SUB MAJ & HONY LT SATENDER KUMAR SINGH 
24 JC216169H SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUBHASH CHANDRA RT
25 JC268628L SUB MAJ & HONY LT VISHNU DATT TIWARI 
26 JC273074F SUB & HONY LT AJAY SINGH 
27 JC275568K SUB & HONY LT CHANDRA PAL SINGH 
28 JC274487X SUB & HONY LT D THANGA RAJ 
29 JC275170P SUB & HONY LT GOPAL DASS 
30 JC278726Y SUB & HONY LT HARI RAM 
31 JC268810L SUB & HONY LT JASVEER SINGH 
32 JC276114H SUB & HONY LT TARSEM SINGH

ARMY AIR DEFENCE

33 JC300023A SUB MAJ & HONY LT KAILASH YADAV 
34 JC299603A SUB MAJ & HONY LT YELAM PALLE VENKATA REDDY
35 JC302368A SUB & HONY LT AUTI BAPU SADASHIV 
36 JC301676N SUB & HONY LT HARMESH KUMAR 
37 JC301722X SUB & HONY LT MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA 
38 JC302512K SUB & HONY LT RAMESH SINGH

ARMY AVIATION CORPS

39 JC269999A SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIKRAM SINGH

 

ENGINEERS


MADRAS ENGINEER GROUP

40 JC308620K SUB MAJ & HONY LT B VELU
41 JC308637X SUB MAJ & HONY LT CHINNALA PAPA RAO
42 JC308602F SUB MAJ & HONY LT CHITHRARANJAN BOSE S
43 JC309025M SUB MAJ & HONY LT HARI KUMAR R
44 JC330710L SUB MAJ & HONY LT HAZRAT ALI SIDDIQUI
45 JC327846K SUB MAJ & HONY LT JOSEPH MJ
46 JC308346X SUB MAJ & HONY LT MANGAL SINGH
47 JC308635M SUB MAJ & HONY LT MA RAVICHANDRAN
48 JC308631W SUB MAJ & HONY LT M PAUL PETER
49 JC309023F SUB MAJ & HONY LT MUKESH KUMAR
50 JC308554M SUB MAJ & HONY LT R JAGANKUMAR
51 JC308603K SUB MAJ & HONY LT SADASHIVA BI
52 JC308600W SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHAIK KALISHAVALI

BENGAL ENGINEER GROUP

53 JC338624P SUB MAJ & HONY LT ARJUN SINGH
54 JC338125A SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIDYADHAR PANDA
55 JC338165F SUB MAJ & HONY LT BRIJ KANT MISHRA
56 JC329800A SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAVI PAL SINGH
57 JC338123P SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHIV PRASAD
58 JC339690K SUB & HONY LT KALAM SINGH

BOMBAY ENGINEER GROUP

59 JC350300W SUB MAJ & HONY LT ABDUL WAHID
60 JC350273X SUB MAJ & HONY LT DUKE SANJAY TRAMBAK
61 JC350204F SUB MAJ & HONY LT HARDEV SINGH
62 JC349720K SUB MAJ & HONY LT JARNAIL SINGH
63 JC330244F SUB MAJ & HONY LT KUNJBIHARI AGRAWAL
64 JC350335M SUB MAJ & HONY LT VISHRAM SINGH GUJAR
65 JC350298K SUB MAJ & HONY LT YADAV SAMBHAJI KASHINATH
66 JC352125L SUB & HONY LT AMRIK SINGH
67 JC351913H SUB & HONY LT INDER BHAN SINGH
68 JC351759P SUB & HONY LT KALASAKAR AVINASH EKANATH
69 JC352219H SUB & HONY LT MOHAMMED ASLAM
70 JC352188N SUB & HONY LT SHENDE RAMKRISHNA VITHOBA

CORPS OF SIGNALS

71 JC370518K SUB MAJ & HONY LT ASHOK KUMAR
72 JC371976M SUB MAJ & HONY LT DEEP RAM SHARMA
73 JC376510N SUB MAJ & HONY LT GODHAN SINGH
74 JC375589P SUB MAJ & HONY LT HARI KISHAN
75 JC376944N SUB MAJ & HONY LT HARI SHANKER YADAV
76 JC376471A SUB MAJ & HONY LT JAI KISHAN
77 JC375591M SUB MAJ & HONY LT JAI NARAIN
78 JC376873X SUB MAJ & HONY LT KAMATA PRASAD DWIVEDI
79 JC376517X SUB MAJ & HONY LT PARITOSH PAUL
80 JC376509Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM PRABHAT TRIPATHI
81 JC376522H SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM PRAWESH PRASAD
82 JC375671K SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM VAKIL
83 JC376994Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT SANJAYA KUMAR MOHANTY
84 JC374961P SUB MAJ & HONY LT SANJOY GHOSH
85 JC371965A SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUNAHARI LAL
86 JC370977H SUB MAJ & HONY LT VINOD KUMAR CHANDEL
87 JC380510L SUB & HONY LT PARDEEP KUMAR
88 JC379311L SUB & HONY LT PARKASH CHAND CHANDEL
 

INFANTRY


THE BRIGADE OF GUARDS

89 JC403938M SUB MAJ & HONY LT JOGA SINGH
90 JC403813P SUB MAJ & HONY LT LAKSHMI SHANKAR PANDEY
91 JC403626W SUB MAJ & HONY LT RANJIT

THE PARACHUTE REGIMENT

92 JC174040L SUB MAJ & HONY LT BAL RAM DUBEY RT
93 JC412627A SUB MAJ & HONY LT TUKARAM SAKHARAM TALEKAR
94 JC413378Y SUB & HONY LT FAGUWA ORAON,SM
95 JC413276H SUB & HONY LT RANJIT SINGH SM

THE MECHANISED INFANTRY REGIMENT

96 JC420868P SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIKRAM SINGH
97 JC420689P SUB MAJ & HONY LT PAWAR MARUTI SRIPATI
98 JC420022N SUB MAJ & HONY LT SATBIR
99 JC420894W SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUKHDEV SINGH

THE PUNJAB REGIMENT

100 JC429416N SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIKAR SINGH
101 JC429994H SUB MAJ & HONY LT DHARAM CHAND
102 JC429598M SUB MAJ & HONY LT JARNAIL SINGH
103 JC430038M SUB MAJ & HONY LT KULDEEP CHAND
104 JC429782X SUB MAJ & HONY LT KULWANT SINGH
105 JC429761F SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM DASS
106 JC223118X SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUKHVIR SINGH RT
107 JC430319H SUB MAJ & HONY LT TARA SINGH
108 JC430858Y SUB & HONY LT CHARN SINGH

THE MADRAS REGIMENT

109 JC439387X SUB MAJ & HONY LT DAVID VIEGAS
110 JC439662M SUB MAJ & HONY LT GOPAKUMAR V
111 JC439642Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT M ALAGUMALAI
112 JC439812X SUB MAJ & HONY LT R PALANISAMY
113 JC439916Y SUB & HONY LT GEORGE PJ

THE GRENADIERS

114 JC449695L SUB MAJ & HONY LT MOHAN RAM
115 JC450162P SUB MAJ & HONY LT NANDRAM JAKHER
116 JC450335F SUB MAJ & HONY LT SARWAN KUMAR
117 JC450241K SUB MAJ & HONY LT TILAK RAJ
118 JC451328X SUB & HONY LT BIR SINGH BHADAURIA
119 JC450875A SUB & HONY LT SATYAWAN
120 JC450895N SUB & HONY LT VIRENDER SINGH SM

THE MARATHA LIGHT INFANTRY

121 JC459174L SUB MAJ & HONY LT GHAG MAHENDRA GOPAL
122 JC459187H SUB MAJ & HONY LT KARAKAMANDA SHAMEEULLA
123 JC459224L SUB MAJ & HONY LT MALAVIKAR ISHWAR NINGOJI
124 JC459243W SUB MAJ & HONY LT SATISH CHANDRA MISHRA
125 JC459963X SUB & HONY LT BHAURAO PATIL
126 JC459697K SUB & HONY LT SALUNKE DILIP KESHAV

THE RAJPUTANA RIFLES

127 JC469841F SUB MAJ & HONY LT BRIJA NAND SINGH
128 JC470222A SUB MAJ & HONY LT RANJEET SINGH
129 JC471116N SUB & HONY LT BAL SINGH
130 JC470620F SUB & HONY LT BHAGWAN SINGH MERTIYA
131 JC470703M SUB & HONY LT CHHEDA SINGH
132 JC470642A SUB & HONY LT SHRI RAM

THE RAJPUT REGIMENT

133 JC479852F SUB MAJ & HONY LT DEVENDRA SINGH SIKARWAR
134 JC479667N SUB MAJ & HONY LT MOHD MAHROOF,SC
135 JC479701H SUB MAJ & HONY LT VIRENDER SINGH AHIR
136 JC480821N SUB & HONY LT BEERENDRA SINGH
137 JC480541A SUB & HONY LT SURENDER SINGH
138 JC480729P SUB & HONY LT VINOD SINGH

THE JAT REGIMENT

139 JC489412F SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAMPHAL
140 JC490627M SUB & HONY LT AMAR SINGH MODSARA
141 JC490798Y SUB & HONY LT BIRMA RAM KHICHAR
142 JC490768F SUB & HONY LT DHARMENDAR SINGH
143 JC490797W SUB & HONY LT DHOOP SINGH
144 JC490746H SUB & HONY LT JUGENDAR SINGH
145 JC490861H SUB & HONY LT MADAN SINGH KULHARI
146 JC490355X SUB & HONY LT MAHENDRA SINGH SUHAG

THE SIKH REGIMENT

147 JC499606X SUB MAJ & HONY LT HARMINDER SINGH
148 JC499404W SUB MAJ & HONY LT LAKHWINDER SINGH
149 JC499182M SUB MAJ & HONY LT MANJIT SINGH
150 JC499475X SUB MAJ & HONY LT SANTOKH SINGH
151 JC499939K SUB & HONY LT SUKHDEV SINGH

THE SIKH LIGHT INFANTRY

152 JC509412L SUB MAJ & HONY LT AMARJIT SINGH
153 JC509183L SUB MAJ & HONY LT HAKAM SINGH
154 JC509161M SUB MAJ & HONY LT KEWAL SINGH
155 JC510171H SUB & HONY LT AJIT SINGH

THE DOGRA REGIMENT

156 JC520541L SUB MAJ & HONY LT ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
157 JC520494Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT CHAND LAL
158 JC520661K SUB MAJ & HONY LT JAYOTI PARKASH,SM
159 JC520468X SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAJ KUMAR
160 JC521511A SUB & HONY LT RATTAN SINGH SISODIA

THE GARHWAL RIFLES

161 JC530332F SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIRENDAR SINGH
162 JC530926W SUB & HONY LT BHAGWATI PRASAD BHATT
163 JC531043Y SUB & HONY LT KALAM SINGH KANDARI
164 JC531099L SUB & HONY LT RUP SINGH RAWAT
165 JC531055N SUB & HONY LT SOHAN SINGH
166 JC531029M SUB & HONY LT TAJBAR SINGH RAWAT

THE KUMAON REGIMENT

167 JC539657W SUB MAJ & HONY LT OM PRAKASH
168 JC540221X SUB MAJ & HONY LT SURENDRA SINGH
169 JC540555M SUB & HONY LT DHYAN SINGH ADHIKARI, SM
170 JC540517W SUB & HONY LT LALIT SINGH
171 JC540836H SUB & HONY LT RAGHUWAR SINGH MEHTA
172 JC540804A SUB & HONY LT SARVESH SINGH

THE ASSAM REGIMENT

173 JC549387A SUB MAJ & HONY LT MINTU SAHA
174 JC549703N SUB & HONY LT CHANDRA DUTTA
175 JC549459Y SUB & HONY LT MAHENDRA BORO

THE BIHAR REGIMENT

176 JC559732W SUB MAJ & HONY LT PRABHU LAL PRASAD
177 JC559654K SUB MAJ & HONY LT SIYA SHARAN PRASAD
178 JC560603H SUB & HONY LT SANGEET KUMAR
179 JC560602A SUB & HONY LT UMESH KUMAR

THE MAHAR REGIMENT

180 JC569683M SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUKHDEV SINGH
181 JC498285Y SUB & HONY LT HARBHEJ SINGH RT
182 JC570385H SUB & HONY LT KAMBLE MADHAV PANDURANG
183 JC570332K SUB & HONY LT RAMESH BHIMRAO INGLE

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR RIFLES

184 JC580214K SUB MAJ & HONY LT AMARJIT SINGH
185 JC580522K SUB MAJ & HONY LT KULDEEP RAJ
186 JC580359P SUB MAJ & HONY LT MAGHAR SINGH SM
187 JC580583F SUB MAJ & HONY LT NIRAJ KUMAR
188 JC580402L SUB MAJ & HONY LT SANTOSH KUMAR
189 JC580474P SUB MAJ & HONY LT SUDESH KUMAR
190 JC581654K SUB & HONY LT AJAY KUMAR CHHETRI
191 JC581658A SUB & HONY LT DAYAL SINGH

THE NAGA REGIMENT

192 JC590200X SUB MAJ & HONY LT KAMAL KISHOR GHILDIYAL
193 JC590197H SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHRI PRASAD THAPA, SM
194 JC590306K SUB & HONY LT SOORBEER SINGH GUSAIN
 

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR LIGHT INFANTRY

195 JC593468A SUB MAJ & HONY LT ASHOK KUMAR
196 JC593045M SUB MAJ & HONY LT KAMAL SINGH
197 JC593728A SUB & HONY LT LAL CHAND
198 JC593921M SUB & HONY LT PRITAM SINGH
199 JC593628P SUB & HONY LT RAFIQ AHMAD MALIK
200 JC593998P SUB & HONY LT SABAR HUSSAIN
201 JC593534X SUB & HONY LT VIJAY KUMAR

GORKHA RIFLES

202 JC602800P SUB & HONY LT TOP BAHADUR THAPA
203 JC607590K SUB MAJ & HONY LT TOP BAHADUR THAPA
204 JC612664X SUB & HONY LT BAL BAHADUR RANA
205 JC612815L SUB & HONY LT DEEPAK KUMAR THAPA
206 JC617690H SUB MAJ & HONY LT BISNU BAHADUR THAPA
207 JC617739N SUB MAJ & HONY LT MANTRI JANG GURUNG
208 JC623704N SUB MAJ & HONY LT JOSEPH ZACHARIAH
209 JC623996F SUB & HONY LT D B R MAGAR
210 JC629763W SUB MAJ & HONY LT YOB RAJ CHHETRI
211 JC634673Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIKASH RAI
212 JC635071X SUB & HONY LT INDRA KUMAR RAI

ARMY SERVICE CORPS (SOUTH)


213 JC665068M SUB MAJ & HONY LT BHIM BAHADUR THAPA
214 JC664817L SUB MAJ & HONY LT G BALAJI
215 JC665064W SUB MAJ & HONY LT JANG BAHADUR SINGH
216 JC642180M SUB MAJ & HONY LT MADHUSUDAN BISWAS
217 JC664539H SUB MAJ & HONY LT NEMI CHAND KHATI
218 JC664034M SUB MAJ & HONY LT PRITPAL SINGH
219 JC664625N SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM DULARE
220 JC642432N SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHYAMAL KUMAR BISWAS

ARMY SERVICE CORPS (ANIMAL TRANSPORT)

221 JC681299M RIS & HONY LT AWADH KUMAR
222 JC681290X RIS & HONY LT MATTA THAVITI NAIDU REDDY
223 JC681291A RIS & HONY LT NAGENDRA PRASAD
224 JC681324A RIS & HONY LT SUSANTA KUMAR PRADHAN

ARMY MEDICAL CORPS

225 JC696636N SUB MAJ & HONY LT ARVIND KUMAR
226 JC693693K SUB MAJ & HONY LT BACHAN SINGH
227 JC696551X SUB MAJ & HONY LT DHIRENDRA PRASAD RAI
228 JC695949A SUB MAJ & HONY LT GOPAL SINGH
229 JC695897P SUB MAJ & HONY LT JAI KARAN
230 JC696578P SUB MAJ & HONY LT KESHAV SINGH
231 JC695901M SUB MAJ & HONY LT MANGE RAM
232 JC696554L SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAMA KRISHNAN V K
233 JC695747Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT SATBIR SINGH
234 JC696497P SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHRI CHAND
235 JC696500K SUB MAJ & HONY LT SRIBASH SAHA

ARMY ORDNANCE CORPS

236 JC725792H SUB MAJ & HONY LT AMBA LAL JANGID
237 JC725661X SUB MAJ & HONY LT BHOORE SINGH
238 JC725858N SUB MAJ & HONY LT BRIJ MOHAN
239 JC726393L SUB MAJ & HONY LT CHANDI PRASAD
240 JC725689X SUB MAJ & HONY LT GOPAL SINGH RATHORE
241 JC725756X SUB MAJ & HONY LT PARBAT SINGH SISODIYA
242 JC724013H SUB MAJ & HONY LT VIJENDER SINGH
243 JC730369M SUB & HONY LT M RAJEN KUMAR SINGH
244 JC727990M SUB & HONY LT PRADIP KUMAR PANDA
245 JC722336M SUB & HONY LT RUKMANI KUMAR TRIPATHI RT

CORPS OF ELECTRONICS AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERS

246 JC762299M SUB MAJ & HONY LT BALWAN SINGH
247 JC757231F SUB MAJ & HONY LT BHIM BAHADUR K C
248 JC756503K SUB MAJ & HONY LT BIR SINGH
249 JC759077M SUB MAJ & HONY LT DEVENDRA SINGH
250 JC757241L SUB MAJ & HONY LT KULDIP SINGH
251 JC763551M SUB MAJ & HONY LT PARVINDER SINGH
252 JC757372W SUB MAJ & HONY LT PURAN CHAND
253 JC757590P SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAKESH KUMAR
254 JC760593N SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM DULAR CHAUDHARY
255 JC757628N SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAM GOPAL SINGH
256 JC760767H SUB MAJ & HONY LT RAMPHAL SINGH KUNDU
257 JC758235K SUB MAJ & HONY LT SANJAY
258 JC757417L SUB MAJ & HONY LT S MARIAPPAN
259 JC757389K SUB MAJ & HONY LT SURJEET SINGH
260 JC759795H SUB MAJ & HONY LT UPENDRA KUMAR NAIK
261 JC760253L SUB & HONY LT ASHOK KUMAR DUBEY
262 JC765150W SUB & HONY LT BHAGIRATH SINGH
263 JC767421F SUB & HONY LT D RAVICHANDRAN
264 JC758853P SUB & HONY LT KRISHAN PAL
265 JC767418F SUB & HONY LT MADHABANANDA SWIAN
266 JC768621K SUB & HONY LT RAJESH KUMAR
267 JC762097L SUB & HONY LT RAM RAJ CHAUHAN
268 JC767300A SUB & HONY LT SHAITAN RAM
269 JC763105L SUB & HONY LT YADAV DHARMENDRA SINGH

ARMY EDUCATION CORPS

270 JC803072W SUB MAJ & HONY LT BINOD BALLABH
271 JC803158P SUB MAJ & HONY LT KAMAL SINGH NEGI
272 JC803069W SUB MAJ & HONY LT NAND LAL ARORA
273 JC803218Y SUB MAJ & HONY LT SHIVA KUMAR SINGH

REMOUNT AND VETERINARY CORPS

274 JC797559L RIS MAJ & HONY LT SURENDRA PAL SINGH

THE INTELLIGENCE CORPS

275 JC810877W SUB MAJ & HONY LT CHUNI LAL SHARMA
276 JC811310M SUB & HONY LT SATISH CHANDER
277 JC811427L SUB & HONY LT YASHPAL SINGH

CORPS OF MILITARY POLICE

278 JC819302H SUB MAJ & HONY LT OM PRAKASH
279 JC819629F SUB & HONY LT BIR BAHADUR YADAVA

THE PIONEER CORPS

280 JC829445W SUB & HONY LT SHISH RAM

DEFENCE SECURITY CORPS

281 JC841406K SUB MAJ & HONY LT NAN BAHADUR
282 JC842683F SUB & HONY LT JAI BHAGWAN
283 JC842767P SUB & HONY LT SUK DHOJ GURUNG

TERRITORIAL ARMY

284 TJ4692M SUB & HONY LT HAWALDAR YADAVA
285 TJ5229H SUB & HONY LT MAHAVIR SINGH RAJPUT
286 TJ5353K SUB & HONY LT NARAYAN LAL
287 TJ5180X SUB & HONY LT SRI AMRIT LAL PATEL


Lessons of Doklam to prepare for the future

hose trying to label it a ‘victory’ for us must be cautioned about what victory involves — that it’s not the end of conflict with China.

At Doklam, the Indian Army took its precautions, didn’t show undue aggression and held its ground in as risky a situation as Nathu-La, allowing New Delhi to execute quiet political handling and deft diplomacy.

 At Doklam, the Indian Army took its precautions, didn’t show undue aggression and held its ground in as risky a situation as Nathu-La, allowing New Delhi to execute quiet political handling and deft diplomacy.

The 72-day Doklam standoff had a vague initiation and an equally diffused termination. That signifies the nature of modern confrontations between nations where the ability to cut through the grey zone is vital to safeguard a nation’s interests. Tracing these issues through the extended logjam would help reach a little more clarity. But it’s also important to acknowledge the mature handling of what could have turned into a very dangerous situation. While this applies primarily to India’s political, military and diplomatic players, in some measure it can also be said for the Chinese. Despite raising the temperature to an unacceptable level, the Chinese too had some pragmatic and reasonable people with a sensible outlook, and their perception did influence the outcome.

The Chinese gambit was possibly intended to pressure India, projecting its supposedly weak military capability, showing the rest of Asia and the world the inability of even a large nation in securing its interests in the face of Chinese intimidation, and forcing India to reassess its emerging strategic relationships with the United States and Japan. The possibility of strategic equations and blocs to counter China has always worried it, not realising that in its quest to seek robust power, there would always be nations whose interests were not served by its blatant intimidation.

The Indian Army moving rapidly into Bhutanese territory to secure Indian interests by preventing the road construction at Doklam would probably have been envisaged by China. However, for this Army to hold on and refuse to budge under intense diplomatic and psychological pressure was probably unexpected. That is how the situation changed, even as the world watched. In this tinderbox situation it needed one spark to change everything — and we had Nathu-La 1967 to fall back on in terms of experience.

An irrational PLA commander had then opened fire on Indian troops working on a wire fence to demarcate our perception of the border, causing heavy casualties; in the almost immediate response, our troops inflicted much more damage on the PLA. At Doklam, the Indian Army took its precautions, didn’t show undue aggression and held its ground in as risky a situation as Nathu-La, allowing New Delhi to execute quiet political handling and deft diplomacy. Analyses in the Indian media also took stock of reality, corrected initial perceptions and backed the government.

Standing out in the political arena was external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj’s extremely mature speech in Parliament, which in restrained terms outlined India’s ability to secure its interests and resolve the issue through diplomatic measures and talks. Progressively, it became increasingly clear China was using the standoff for internal political purposes too.

A wrong move would equally upset its carefully crafted strategy. What was most evidently on display was China’s inability to think through to a situation which could put it at advantage should India decide not to be coerced. The PLA, which adopted the doctrine of war under “informationised” conditions 25 years ago, proved it still has much to learn. Its crude attempts at intimidation through extremely unsubtle measures of psychological warfare actually allowed India to gain moral ascendancy. Its live firing demonstrations in Tibet may have caused some concern, but India’s quiet response was the advancing of 33 Corps’ operational alert by a month. If anything was at all proved here, it was that ranting and raving rhetoric doesn’t impress anyone. That could also be a lesson for segments of the Indian media, the majority of which showed a high level of maturity.

The combination of India’s veteran warriors, former diplomats, accomplished academics and experienced media hands choreographed a communication strategy without actually planning one. It just gelled, keeping the nation well informed and the government fully supported. The Opposition did its bit in terms of critique, but did not take it beyond.

I have said this elsewhere, but it needs repetition. The Chinese would probably not have accepted a standdown until the convening of the 19th congress of the CPC in late October-early November in order to prevent any loss of face. But it happened well before, and possibly as a fallout of national security adviser Ajit Doval’s pre-Brics parleys in Beijing.

A major multilateral summit with unresolved tension on the border would not go down well with anyone, including international observers and Communist stalwarts, as it would cast doubt on President Xi Jinping’s abilities as an effective leader. As a clean break from the standoff would show Chinese weakness, India hasn’t objected to the grey projections by the Chinese foreign ministry on the actual disengagement by PLA troops, which isn’t really in doubt.

Face-saving is being done by vague Chinese statements like the PLA continuing to patrol the Donglang (Chinese for Doklam) “area”. When the word “area” precedes or follows a landmark, you know there’s nothing definitive about the swathe of ground the PLA still occupies. While it sets the tone for an amicable visit by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to China for the Brics summit, and saves face for the Chinese, it is creating some concern in some circles within India. Those trying to label it a “victory” for us must be cautioned about what victory involves — that it’s not the end of conflict with China. The Chinese will henceforth wargame situations more seriously as even in their perception while it may not be “victory” for India, it was surely “advantage” India. China won’t be able to stomach that in the pressure cooker international environment, where uncertainty is the name of the game.

So instead of debating the actual Chinese pullout, without which the Indian Army too wouldn’t have stepped back, it’s best if all national security stakeholders in India chalk out a couple of strategic wargames involving comprehensive military, diplomatic, political and logistics issues for a war covering two and a half fronts. One can’t remember when such an exercise was done with full political involvement. That will keep the focus on infrastructure, ground and maritime capability, as well as cyber and air capability for the future.


Sikkim standoff: Bhutan rejects Beijing’s claim that Doklam belongs to China

The government of Bhutan today rejected Chinese claims that it had conveyed to Beijing through the diplomatic channels that the Doklam area was not its territory, news agency ANI reported.

“Our position on the border issue of Doklam is very clear. Please refer to our statement which has been published on the web site of Bhutan’s foreign ministry on June 29, 2017,” ANI quoted its official sources in the Bhutanese Government as saying.

On Wednesday, China’s top diplomat on the border dispute, Wang Wenli, reportedly told a visiting Indian media delegation that Bhutan has conveyed to Beijing through the diplomatic channels that the area of the standoff is not its territory although she did not provide any evidence in support of her claim.

“After the incident, the Bhutanese made it very clear to us that the place where the trespassing happened is not Bhutan’s territory,” Wang Wenli was quoted as saying by news agency PTI.

Wang Wenli further alleged that the Bhutanese find it very strange that the Indian border troops are on the Chinese soil and claimed that her views have been gleaned from Bhutanese state media and legal blogs which have “more convincing information”.

According to ANI, its official sources in Bhutan government have firmly denied Chinese claims by pointing out that Thimphu had clearly stated its stand on this matter in a statement on June 29, 2017 which was also posted on the web site of Bhutan’s foreign ministry.

“Bhutan has conveyed to the Chinese side, both on the ground and through the diplomatic channel, that the construction of the (motorable) road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the (written) agreements (of 1988 and 1998) and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between our two countries,” the Bhutanese foreign ministry statement said.

ANI further quoted its sources as saying that the statement is clear that the agreements of 1988 and 1998 also state that both sides “will refrain from taking unilateral action, or use of force, to change the status quo of the boundary and Bhutan hopes that the status quo in the Doklam area will be maintained as before 16 June, 2017.”

India has also supported the statement issued by the government of Bhutan and pointed out that the construction of the road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the 1988 and 1998 agreements between Bhutan and China and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between these two countries.


Doklam over, India, China disengage Breakthrough ahead of Modi’s BRICS Summit trip

Doklam over, India, China disengage

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 28

India and China today agreed to “expeditious disengagement” of border personnel at Doklam, bringing to an end a tense standoff since June 16 at the plateau located at the Sikkim-Bhutan-China tri-junction.The announcement that the process of disengagement “has since been almost completed under verification” comes ahead of the September 3-5 BRICS Summit in China. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to attend the annual meeting of the multi-lateral grouping.

Edit:Border standoff

Emphasising that India always maintained it is only through diplomatic channels that differences on such matters can be addressed, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said: “Our principled position is that agreements and understandings reached on boundary issues must be scrupulously respected.”(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)The MEA was responding to questions following reports quoting Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying that Indian soldiers and equipment had been pulled back to the Indian side of the border and the Chinese side continued to patrol the Doklam area. “The Chinese side continues to uphold sovereignty and territorial integrity according to the historical convention,” she said.There was no mention by either side whether the construction of the road, which India objected to, would be stopped by China.The dispute leading to a face-off at the border began after Indian troops stepped on to a territory held by Bhutan, preventing a Chinese team from constructing a road near the plateau. While New Delhi said it significantly changed the status quo having “serious security implications” for it, China insisted India must pull back its troops before any discussion.Earlier, India announced that both sides maintained diplomatic communication and during these exchanges, New Delhi was able to express its views and convey its concerns and interests.The MEA said India’s policy remained guided by the belief that peace and tranquility in the border areas was an essential prerequisite to further development of bilateral relationship.Meanwhile, sources in the Indian Army said while its troops disengaged around noon, its “operational alert” across the 3,488-km-long Line of Actual Control (LAC) will continue during the month.Vigil will continue, the sources said, adding that operational moves on the Indian side would continue. China recently created a western theatre.


Concerns conveyed, says New Delhi“In recent weeks, India and China have maintained diplomatic communication in respect of incident at Doklam. We were able to express our views and convey concerns and interests… On this basis, expeditious disengagement of border personnel at face-off site has been agreed to, and is ongoing”— An MEA statementIndia has pulled back: Beijing“On the afternoon of August 28, the Indian side pulled back all Indian troops and equipment to the Indian side of the boundary and the Chinese personnel have verified this… The Chinese side will continue to exercise its sovereignty and uphold its territorial integrity in accordance with historical conventions” — Chinese spokesperson


1,400 km duathlon: A test of grit in memory of martyrs Expedition marks 18th anniversary of Kargil conflict

1,400 km duathlon: A test of grit in memory of martyrs
Members participating in the Victory Run from Delhi to Dras to pay homage to Kargil martyrs on the conflict’s 18th anniversary during their flag-off from Chandigarh by former Army Chief Gen VP Malik on Saturday. Tribune photo: Manoj Mahajan

Expedition marks 18th anniversary of Kargil conflict

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 5

To commemorate the 18th anniversary of the 1999 Kargil conflict and pay tributes to martyrs, a victory run is being organised where 18 soldiers are undertaking a duathlon (run-cycle-run) from New Delhi to Dras in Jammu and Kashmir from July 30 to August 29.The aim is to create a world record for the longest duathlon, covering 1,400 kilometers. It was flagged off on its next leg by Gen VP Malik (retd), who was the Army Chief during the conflict, from the Chandigarh War Memorial here on Saturday.A simple ceremony was held at the memorial, where a wreath was laid in the memory of the martyrs of the Kargil War and the expedition flag was handed over to the team leader, Wg Cdr Paramvir Singh, an ultra-endurance athlete. The team includes a female member, Lt Col Lipsa.The first leg of 574 km from Delhi to Manali via Chandigarh will take 12 days. From Manali, the team will begin cycling and cover 557 km to Leh with a detour to Khardung La – the highest point on the route at 5,358m. Finally, after the only day of rest and acclimatisation at Leh, they will begin running again and cover 270 km to culminate at Dras, where the Kargil War Memorial is located.This would not only be the most challenging duathlon in the world but also the longest duathlon ever, involving steep uphill and downhill gradients, extremely hot and humid weather in the plains to cold temperature in Ladakh and the effects of the high altitude, requiring the highest levels of endurance, both physical and mental.


Law and order top priority ahead of dera chief’s sentencing: Haryana DGP

Law and order top priority ahead of dera chief’s sentencing: Haryana DGP
DGP BS Sandhu. ANI

Chandigarh, August 27

Maintaining law and order will be the top priority for the Haryana Police on Monday, when the quantum of Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s sentence will be announced, state DGP BS Sandhu said today even as the toll in Friday’s violence rose to 38.To ensure there was no repeat of violence that erupted in Panchkula last week when thousands of Dera followers gathered around the CBI court that convicted Singh in a rape case, all routes to the Sunaria jail in Rohtak, where the self-styled godman has been lodged, have been sealed.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Addressing a press conference here, DGP Sandhu said that in Haryana, only Sirsa, where the sect is headquartered, was now under curfew.“The top priority now is to ensure that law and order is maintained when the sentencing of convicted Dera Sacha Sauda chief takes place in Rohtak tomorrow,” he said.The DGP added that the death toll in the violence that broke out in Panchkula and Sirsa after the conviction of the dera chief on Friday had risen to 38.While 32 persons died in the violence on Friday at Panchkula, six others died at Sirsa, where curfew was still in place, he said.The dera chief is now lodged in the Sunaria jail in Rohtak, where the special CBI court judge will be flown from here for the pronouncement of the sentence.On Friday, the court had convicted the dera chief in a rape case.In Rohtak, foolproof arrangements have been made and all routes leading to the jail have been sealed, DGP Sandhu said.Asked about a 35-year-old cameraman of a news channel being attacked today at Sirsa allegedly by dera followers, Sandhu said a case has been registered in this regard.He sought to assure media persons that the police will give them full protection, but urged them to take precautions when they venture out into sensitive areas. — PTI


Ambala martyr’s kin to approach High Court Want gallantry award for him

Nitish Sharma

Tribune News Service

Ambala, August 5

Family members of Major Yogesh Gupta, who sacrificed his life while fighting terrorists in Surankot in Jammu and Kashmir in July, 2002, have decided to approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court if no gallantry award and a road or a chowk is announced after the martyr.Ved Prakash Gupta, farther of the martyr, says, “No gallantry award has been announced for Yogesh though he killed four dreaded terrorists before sacrificing his life. My wife, who struggled for nearly 15 years to keep the name of Yogesh alive in public memory, died on June 13 with her earnest desire unfulfilled. We feel dejected when a gallantry award is presented to the next of kin of other martyrs while Yogesh has been given none”.“We have written numerous letters to the GOC in Ambala, the President, the Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of Defence, local administration, state officials and the MLA over the last 15 years, but to no avail”, he adds.Gupta says, “We just want a road or a chowk to be named after Major Yogesh. After a struggle of 15 years, we got a reply in February this year that according to the government policy, the Deputy Commissioner has the authority to effect the change after considering the matter as and when any gram panchayat or municipal council approaches him with a resolution in this regard”.“It gives us a feeling that a letter from a gram panchayat or a municipal council gets more respect than the martyrdom of an Army Major and the struggle of his parents. It is the duty of the local administration and the government to do the needful instead of the aggrieved family to request people to pass resolutions and approach them,” he adds.The martyr’s father says, “We are not seeking monetary help. It is a matter of honouring a martyr and remembering his bravery. Renaming a road or a chowk will help in keeping his name alive and inspiring the future generation”.“We have written a letter to Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar and sent a reminder to the Ministry of Defence this week. This is our last attempt, as we have been struggling for 15 years now. If no gallantry award is announced or a chowk is renamed after Major Yogesh, we will approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court to seek justice for the martyr,” says Gupta.


Army on standby, more para forces arrive

Army on standby, more para forces arrive
Sirsa Deputy Commissioner Prabhjot Singh (extreme right) and SSP Ashwin Shenvi review security arrangements at a police naka on Wednesday. Photo: Manoj Dhaka

Geetanjali Gayatri

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 23

The state has been put on “high alert” with prohibitory orders being clamped in 10 districts, including Panchkula, Sirsa and those bordering neighbouring Punjab, ahead of the verdict in a rape case against Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh.The state government, which is on tenterhooks with regard to the law and order situation, has intimated the Army to be prepared to step in, if and when needed. The possibility of curfew is not ruled out.As many as 2,500 more police personnel have been mobilised by way of rationalisation to keep vigil till the verdict in the case is out.Even as 18 more companies of paramilitary forces arrived in the state taking the total number of companies available to 53, the Manohar Lal Khattar-led BJP government deputed 10 senior IPS officers and 10 HCS officers to monitor the law and order situation in Panchkula.The government has also notified temporary prisons in various districts and two drones have been pressed into service in Panchkula to keep an eye on the dera followers camping in the city.Haryana Roadways buses would ply normally on their regular routes in the state over the next two days but will not enter Ambala and Panchkula as a precautionary measure.While social media is being closely monitored in all 10 “sensitive” districts, sources in the government said it was not averse to the idea of suspending internet services, if needed. “All content on social media is being closely scrutinised at the district level and internet services could be suspended if the situation turns volatile,” sources claimed.Declaring a three-day holiday in educational institutions, including government, private, government-aided and BEd colleges and universities of the state from August 23 to 25, as per a notification of the Higher Education Department, the government cancelled leave of field officers and police personnel while ordering all medical and paramedical staff to remain on duty till August 30. Closure of schools, however, has been left to the respective Deputy Commissioners.Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Ram Niwas, said the situation in the state was dynamic and the government would employ all measures to maintain law and order in view of the changing situation.


Govt weighs options

  • With followers of Dera Sacha Sauda chief streaming into Panchkula and at the dera headquarters in Sirsa as a build-up to the August 25 verdict of the CBI court in the rape case against him, the government is learnt to be weighing various options to deal with the fluid ground situation in the state even as uncertainty surrounds the appearance of the dera chief in the court.
  • Though the government is hopeful that the Dera chief will show up in the court, the top brass spent the day reviewing security arrangements and weighing its options during various rounds of meetings.
  • Sources said there was a possibility that the judgment in the case could be delivered via video-conferencing with the dera chief in Sirsa if there seemed a possibility of the situation turning volatile. Further, the government could move an application in the CBI court seeking deferral of the verdict if there is a threat to the law and order situation.

Dera followers told to hide identity Hisar: Dera Sacha Sauda followers are being guided on ways to hoodwink security forces and reach Panchkula. At Naam Charcha Ghars, ‘premis’ are gathering and being told to reach Panchkula by all means and keep their identities hidden. At the Naam Charcha Ghar in Gangwa village in this district, it was announced through a mike to take Haryana Roadways buses or any private vehicle to reach Panchkula. ‘Premis’ have been told not to take the pendant with a photo of the dera head along. “Instructions are being issued to the followers via Whatsapp groups,” a source said, adding that they were advised not to proceed in groups.—TNS


Our restraint has a bottom line, China warns India on Doklam

Beijing releases ‘facts’ on Indian troops crossing border into its territory

BEIJING: China on Friday warned its restraint has a “bottom line” and demanded that India immediately withdraw its troops from Doklam to end a military standoff near the Sikkim border that is currently in its second month.

AP FILEChinese troops hold a banner in this 2013 photo, saying, ‘You’ve crossed the border, please go back’, in Ladakh. China insists India withdraw its troops before talks can take place to settle the most protracted standoff in recent years between the two nations.A statement issued by its defence ministry said “goodwill has its principles and restraint has its bottom line”, adding the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) showed a high level of restraint.

This was the latest in a string of strongly worded Chinese statements that put the onus of ending the face-off in the Doklam region on India. New Delhi has said both sides should pull back their troops before talks can begin.

The statement said Indian troops illegally crossed the border into Chinese territory on June 18 and obstructed road construction work on the Chinese side. “China has shown utmost goodwill and sought to communicate with India through diplomatic channels to resolve the incident. Chinese armed forces have also shown a high level of restraint with an eye to the general bilateral relations and the regional peace and stability,” defence ministry spokesman Ren Guoqiang said.

The statement was released a day after India’s external affairs ministry said peace along the border constituted an important prerequisite for the smooth development of bilateral relations.

The Chinese statement rejected India’s view and said this was a delaying tactic.

“Ren urged the Indian side to give up the illusion of its delaying tactic, as no country should underestimate the Chinese forces’ confidence and capability to safeguard peace and their resolve and willpower to defend national sovereignty, security and development interests,” it said.

Ren added that China’s armed forces will resolutely protect the country’s territorial sovereignty and security interests.

China has repeatedly blamed India for the Doklam impasse, accusing Indian soldiers of trespass and preventing Chinese soldiers from building a road in the region, which is under Chinese control but claimed by Bhutan.

Beijing has also said the two sides can open talks only after the Indian troops are withdrawn. New Delhi says the road, if built, will have serious security implications and alter the status quo.

“The defence ministry’s statement pointed out that China has shown tolerance. But that doesn’t come without principles,” Wang Dehua, from Shanghai Municipal Centre for International Studies, told Hindustan Times.

“The bottom line is the boundary line (in Sikkim), which has already been settled. India should withdraw all intruders immediately without any condition,” Wang added.

It is in India’s interest to withdraw, said Shanghai-based military expert Ni Lexiong.

Even if the Indian military has initial advantages in case of hostilities in terms of geography, climate and deployment, the Chinese military will be able to overcome difficulties, Lexiong said.

“India does not have its own system of defence industrial production, and when having a comprehensive war with China within the scope of conventional war, even if the beginning can be well, it will soon be unsustainable,” Lexiong added.


Tales from two Punjabs : Old rulers, new challenges by KC Singh

Tales from two Punjabs
Rajmata Mohinder Kaur has passed on to her son, Capt Amarinder Singh, a part of the republican and Akali tradition

KC Singh

TWO events affecting the chief ministers in the two Punjabs on the opposite side of the Indo-Pakistan border remind one of William Wordsworth’s The Solitary Reaper: “For old, unhappy, far-off things; And battles long ago”. One was the passing away of the Punjab Chief Minister, Capt Amarinder Singh’s mother and the last recognised Maharani of Patiala, Rajmata Mohinder Kaur nee Mehtab Kaur. The other is Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s ouster in Pakistan on the vacuous ground of his conduct lacking “ameen” and “sadiq”, words implying undefined piety, inserted in the Pakistani constitution by the late President Zia-ul-Haq from Islamic jurisprudence, simply because he concealed the unpaid chairmanship of a free trade zone company in Dubai. Nawaz is likely to be replaced by his brother, Shahbaz Sharif, the current Chief Minister of Pakistani Punjab. Both events have provenance that merits recalling.The Rajmata was married at 16 and became the Maharani of Patiala a year later, on the death of her colourful father-in-law, Maharaja Bhupinder Singh. She has now left amidst all the pomp that the mother of the current ruler of Punjab, not just Patiala, automatically begets. Both my family and that of my wife flourished under the last two rulers of the Patiala state. My wife’s grandfather, Lt-Gen Balwant Singh, rose to head the Patiala state forces before retiring in 1948. My grandfather, Capt Waryam Singh, was In-charge of Deodi i.e. comptroller of household in the 1920s, serving a young Bhupinder Singh.My debt to Patiala is thus indirect and distant, although the past, bits of which one learnt in one’s youth, is worth recalling. This is also a way of condoling for those who are neither friends of Captain Sahib nor courtiers, and yet are more than passing acquaintances; protocol and inaccessibility rule out a personal visit. The first wife of Maharaja Yadavindra Singh was Rajkumari Hem Prabha Devi of Saraikela, now in Orissa, from the family of Singhdeos. She passed away unheralded in 2014, aged 101. The stated reason for the Crown Prince remarrying was the first marriage being issueless. Actually the truth is more complex.Alongside the freedom movement agitation began in states run by local rulers for greater political rights and civil liberties. The Panjab Riyasti Praja Mandal was formed in 1928, aligning itself with the national All India States People’s Conference. The initiative in Punjab came from Akali workers, self-confident after succeeding at gurdwara reform. At their first meeting at Mansa on July 17, 1928, they appointed Seva Singh Thikrivala as president. In 1929 they produced a report titled “Indictment of Patiala” against Maharaja Bhupinder Singh and sent it to the Viceroy. Despite this the Maharaja, as the sitting Chancellor of the Chamber of Princes was the sole representative of rulers at the Round Table Conference in November 1930. The Praja Mandal stepped up the agitation and Thikrivala, who had been once released, was jailed again in 1933, where he died in 1935.The father of the Rajamata, Harchand Singh Jaijee, was a close aide of Thikrivala. That is why despite the family belonging to Patiala, the Rajmata was born at Ludhiana, a part of British India and out of Maharaja Patiala’s reach. In 1936 Patiala state signed an agreement with Akali leader Master Tara Singh, splitting the Praja Mandal movement. The marriage of Sardar Jaijee’s daughter to the heir apparent Yadavindra Singh in 1938 thus tied into this appeasing of Sikh sentiments. In fact, stories circulated that Akali leaders wanted the future ruler of Patiala to marry in a Sikh family so as to beget genuine Sikh heirs. Ironically, having got their wish in the birth of Capt Amarinder Singh, Akalis now discover that he has become their main Congress challenger in Punjab, as the Bluestar taint does not stick on him.Thus Captain Singh inherited both a regal lineage through his father but also a republican and Akali tradition through his mother. As an inheritor of this fusion it was not surprising he walked away from the Congress in 1984 over the Army entering the Golden Temple during Operation Bluestar. I remember as Deputy Secretary to President Zail Singh in 1984, when PM Indira Gandhi’s office was desperately trying to locate and dissuade Captain Sahib the argument in Rashtrapati Bhavan was that his maternal Jaijee family had incited Captain Singh. The Rajmata herself showed the same streak when throwing her lot with the Morarji Desai Congress, due to her rumoured friendship with Asoka Mehta, one of the founders of the trade union movement and INTUC.  Thus the Rajmata’s death closes this chapter of Indian and Punjab history where she bridged the divide between effete royalty and Sikh and republican traditions, as indeed the conflict within the Congress between its past freedom movement camaraderie and subservience to one family.In Pakistan it is again a concerted attempt by the military and its allies like Imran Khan to end Nawaz Sharif’s attempt to perpetuate family rule. Shahbaz, I have on authority of a former aide to the then PM Nawaz Sharif, was in the PM’s house in 1999 when Nawaz decided to sack the Army chief, Gen Perevz Musharraf, during an official visit to Sri Lanka. General Musharraf indirectly confirmed this recently saying he thought Shahbaz was his friend. Nawaz’s family had convinced him that Shahbaz and Musharraf were plotting against him. So he never consulted his own brother before his foolish move. Shahbaz is obviously more acceptable to the military than Nawaz’s daughter, Mariam, who was the designated heir. He also has had working relations with Jehadi outfits, having used the carrot and the stick to control them in Punjab. There will be continuity and change, the nature of which will determine Indo-Pak relations. Similarly, the Modi government is not only impaling Lalu Yadav but his entire line of heirs with money laundering charges. Corruption, money-laundering, Panama Papers, benami deals are the new weapons which those in power in the subcontinent are using to corner political rivals and their families. But like the Akalis in Punjab, the BJP may find that clearing the cluttered Opposition leadership stable may actually open space for new leaders who could become the real challenge. The BJP and the Pakistani Army must remember the Chinese curse: “May all your wishes come true”. The writer is a former Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs