Sanjha Morcha

Expand maritime footprint to check China

China recognises that geography gives India special position in the Indian Ocean but has warned that the ocean is not its backyard. China’s Defence Papers have linked its national security and development interests. China buys most of its oil from the Middle East and access to ports in the Indian Ocean Region is among its economic and security priorities.

Expand maritime footprint to check China

Choppy waters: Traditionally, India has regarded the Indian Ocean as its maritime sphere. PTI

Anita Inder Singh

Founding Professor, Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution

Geography gives India a strategic edge in the Indian Ocean, but that is insufficient to counter China’s growing influence in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), which stretches from Africa to Australia. Sino-Indian rivalry and New Delhi’s wish to balance China largely explain India’s offer to sell arms to countries in the IOR at the inaugural Indian Ocean Defence Ministers’ Conclave, held on the sidelines of the Aero India show in Bengaluru on February 4. More than 20 countries — from Madagascar to Singapore — attended the meeting, which focused on the enhancement of stability and prosperity in the IOR.

As an arms retailer, India will face tough competition from China. The world’s seventh largest arms vendor, China is already the top seller of weapons to several Indian Ocean states, including India’s friendly neighbours like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Myanmar. India ranks 23rd as an international arms seller. So, how realistic is New Delhi’s aim of selling $5 billion worth of arms in five years’ time? That is an open question.

Attempts by India and China to expand their influence in the IOR highlight the strategic and economic importance of the ocean’s international waters to both countries. Traditionally, India has regarded the Indian Ocean as its maritime sphere. Parts of the ocean comprise India’s territorial waters. Most of India’s trade by volume and all its vital oil imports traverse the ocean, so maritime security in the IOR is a strategic and economic imperative.

China recognises that geography gives India a special position in the Indian Ocean but it has warned that the ocean is not India’s backyard. Since 2015, China’s Defence Papers have linked its national security and development interests. The world’s largest oil importer, China buys 40 per cent of its oil from the Middle East, so the openness of the ocean’s seaways, access to ports in the IOR and the acquisition of a stake in them are among China’s top economic and security priorities. Throughout the IOR, China’s presence and influence have increased. Most countries in the IOR have joined China’s Belt and Road Initiative, presenting it with the opportunity to offer them both investment and military gear.

China’s naval strength in the Indian Ocean is greater than India’s. The People’s Liberation Army Navy is bigger than the Indian Navy and it can deploy more sea-based aircraft. India is safeguarding its interests in the IOR. The Indian Navy has significantly increased its deployment of warships, submarines and other assets in the IOR, in an attempt to send across a message to China. The extent to which India is able to deploy advanced technologies will have a bearing on its status as major South Asian and Indian Ocean power.

China’s growing presence in the Indian Ocean reflects its wish to consolidate its role in the IOR and enhance its global maritime power. China has moved submarines, destroyers, special operations forces and guided-missile frigates into the Indian Ocean.

With most states in the IOR, China has strengthened its trade and investment ties. It has developed ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar and enhanced its influence in the region. It has also built its first overseas naval base in Djibouti in north-west Africa. Djibouti is strategically located at the southern entrance to the Red Sea, en route to the Suez Canal. The canal connects Asia to Europe and Africa.

The China factor also represents the most significant challenge to India’s politico-military strategy in the Western Indian Ocean. In recent years, China has strengthened trade ties with Middle East countries. Beijing is a major import-export partner of India’s friend, Israel. It is also Saudi Arabia’s largest trading partner and is helping to finance Riyadh’s ‘Vision 2030’ to help diversify the Saudi economy and transform Saudi Arabia into a major industrial powerhouse and an international logistics hub.

India must contend with the hard fact that it cannot take even friendly neighbouring countries for granted. Take the case of Sri Lanka. On January 15, about 10 days after External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar visited Sri Lanka, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared that because of regional security considerations — implying India’s suspicions of China’s clout in Sri Lanka — India’s Adani Ports company and its Japanese partners would build the East Container Terminal of Colombo port. But on February 2, Sri Lanka made the shock announcement that Adani Ports would not be allowed to develop the terminal because the “foreign company” did not agree to its proposals and because of opposition from trade unions. Some Indian officials see Chinese prodding behind Sri Lanka’s volte face. News of its U-turn came a few days after Sri Lanka received free anti-Covid vaccines from India. Good vaccine diplomacy is clearly not intertwined with success in port diplomacy.

China’s strengthening influence in the Indian Ocean goes against the Indian vision of an IOR where security rests on the balance of power rather than dominance by any single country — whether that is the US or China. This is a major reason why New Delhi has signed logistics agreements with the US, France and Australia to counter China’s naval presence beyond India’s immediate maritime neighbourhood. But to counter China successfully in the choppy waters of the Indian Ocean, arms sales, military strength and partnerships must be accompanied by more economic investment and trade with countries in the IOR.


No longer farmers’ stir alone: Unions

http://

Kuldip Bhatia

Jagraon (Ludhiana), Feb 11

Not just farmers, but people from all walks of life attended Punjab’s first “kisan mahapanchayat” here on Thursday. Women too participated in large numbers. Enthused by the massive turnout, Sanyukt Kisan Morcha leader BS Rajewal claimed that the determination shown by farmers camping at Delhi borders had shaken the Modi government, “which is now trying to find a face-saving formula to wriggle out of the mess it created through the agri laws.”

Ready to amend laws, if need be: Centre

The Union Government is ready to discuss the new laws with farmers’ leaders with an open mind and to amend these, if necessary, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said on Thursday.

He said the agitation had “awakened” the entire nation and the global community too was keenly watching the developments in India. “The government is out to disband the mandi system by allowing free trade of foodgrain so as to leave the farmers at the mercy of big business houses,” Rajewal alleged.

He said farmers would hold candlelight marches on February 14 to pay tributes to the Pulwama martyrs and observe February 16 as “kisan-mazdoor day” in memory of Sir Chhotu Ram. Other leaders, SS Dharamkot, KS Sandhu, Manjit Dhaner, Nirbhai S Dhudike, HS Lakhowal and JS Ugrahan, vowed to take the agitation to its logical conclusion. Dhaner claimed it was no longer a farmers’ struggle. “With a majority of people backing the farmers, it has become a mass movement,” he said. Ugrahan exhorted the people to prepare for a long battle. “The government is trying to impose a globally failed model of agricultural system on the farmers. Over 80 per cent farmers, especially small cultivators, will lose their landholdings to corporates because of the laws” he claimed.

A series of ‘mahapanchayats’ have been held in Haryana against the farm laws.Three of these were addressed by BKU leader Rakesh Tikait, who has been spearheading the protest at the Ghazipur border for over two months.


Tikait to address kisan mahapanchayat in Maharashtra on February 20 Yavatmal has earned the dubious distinction of being the hotspot of farmers’ suicides

Tikait to address kisan mahapanchayat in Maharashtra on February 20

Rakesh Tikait. PTI file

Nagpur, February 12

Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait will hold a kisan mahapanchayat and a public rally in Yavatmal district of Maharashtra on February 20, an office-bearer of Samyukta Kisan Morcha has said.

Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) is an umbrella body of 40 farmer unions protesting at various Delhi border points against the three farm laws.

Its Maharashtra coordinator Sandip Gidde told PTI that Tikait, Yudveer Singh and several other leaders of the SKM would hold the mahapanchayat and public meeting at Azad Maidan in Yavatmal.

“Tikait wants to start the kisan mahapanchayat in Maharashtra from Yavatmal, which has earned the dubious distinction of being the hotspot of farmer suicides,” he said.

Farmers from Vidarbha and parts of Maharashtra are expected to participate in the mahapanchayat, for which permission has been sought.

A police official from Yavatmal said the organisers had sought permission for the event. PTI

 


Modi has ceded India’s land to China: Rahul The Congress leader was addressing a press conference

http://

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, February 12

A day after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told Parliament that India had not lost any territory in the LAC standoff in Eastern Ladakh, the Congress on Friday alleged that the government had ceded land to China saying the Indian territory between Fingers 3 and 4 had been ceded to China.

In a press conference at the AICC headquarters before leaving for his tractor rally in Rajasthan, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accused the government of compromising the previous demand or status quo ante as of April 2020.

“There are a couple of things that need to be made clear. The government position at the beginning of the LAC standoff was status quo ante as of April 2020. Now, sheepishly the Defence Minister comes and makes a statement and we find that the Indian troops are going to be stationed at Finger 3. Indian territory was till Finger 4. Why has the PM ceded the land between Fingers 3 and 4 to the Chinese?” Gandhi asked accusing the PM of cowardice and of not being able to stand up to China.

Gandhi asked why the Chinese had not withdrawn from the Depsang Plains and the Gogra and Hot Springs areas.

Attacking the PM for not protecting Indian land, Gandhi said, “Why have the Indian troops after all the hard work they did capturing Kailash Ranges been asked to move back? Why have the Chinese not withdrawn from strategic areas?”

Gandhi said India didn’t have any strategic advantage during LAC discussions and the only proof of any advantage was when the Indian troops captured Kailash Ranges.

Even that had been lost, said Gandhi, asking the PM to explain the position and accusing him of betraying the valour of Indian troops.


Farmers’ protest: Unions to hold ‘kisan mahapanchayats’ across country in coming days

Farmers’ protest: Unions to hold ‘kisan mahapanchayats’ across country in coming days

Farmers at Ghazipur border during the ongoing protest against Centre’s new farm laws in New Delhi on Thursday. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan Bhui

New Delhi, February 11

The Samkyukta Kisan Morcha, an umbrella body of protesting farmer unions, on Thursday announced that ‘kisan mahapanchayats’ will be organised across the country in the coming days against the Centre’s three agri laws.

The morcha made it clear that it will not call off the ongoing protest until its demands to repeal the laws and bring legal guarantee for minimum support price on their crops are met.

In a statement, the protesting farmers’ body said its teams are planning the programmes of the state-wise mahapanchayats.

The move comes a day after it announced a four-hour nationwide ‘rail roko’ (rail blockade) on February 18 to press for their demands.

Protesting farmer leader Darshan Pal said a mahapanchayat will be held in Moadabad (Uttar Pradesh) on Friday, followed by Bahadurgarh bypass (Haryana) on February 13, Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan) on February 18, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan) on Februrary 19 and Sikar (Rajasthan) on February 23.

Thousands of farmers, mostly from Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh, have been camping at the three Delhi border points — Singhu, Tikri and Ghazipur — for over 75 days.

In a statement, Pal alleged that the government is not serious to fulfil the “fair and genuine” farmers’ demand of ‘karza mukti, pura daam’.

The unions also claimed that the Haryana government has proposed to install CCTV cameras at the Tikri border protest site.

Meanwhile, Swaraj India leader Yogendra Yadav, who has been actively involved in the agitation, issued a statement terming as “baseless” the allegation made by Congress member Ravneet Singh Bittu blaming him for the Republic Day violence in the national capital.

Speaking in the Lok Sabha on February 9, Bittu claimed that Yadav had incited the farmers which lead to the violence on January 26.

At the Singhu border protest site, the unions have begun strengthening the infrastructure by installing CCTV cameras for enhanced security, electric fans to beat the heat in the coming months, and laying separate optical fibre line for wi-fi facility in case there is another internet shutdown.

These are some of the measures taken by the agitating farmers to prepare for a long haul as a resolution of the stalemate over the new farm legislation seems unlikely anytime soon.

“We are strengthening our communication and other infrastructure to continue the agitation for a long period,” said Deep Khatri associated with managing logistics at the Singhu Border protest site.

To increase security measures and keep miscreants at bay, 100 CCTV cameras with digital video recorders are being installed at the main stage used by the Morcha and also at some identified spots across the protest site’s stretch on the GT Karnal Road.

The protesting farmer unions have been alleging that the laws will weaken the minimum support price mechanism and end mandi system.

But the government says the new legislations offer more options to farmers to sell their crops, and will help raise their incomes. PTI


Laws will destroy mandis, help corporates: Rahul Says entire country backing farmers’ protest

Laws will destroy mandis, help corporates: Rahul

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, February 11

In a stinging attack on the Narendra Modi government, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi today accused it of destroying mandis and promoting hoarding to “benefit a couple of corporate friends”. He spun around an old family planning slogan “hum do hamare do” to make his point.

“The nation is being run by four persons,” said Rahul.

Rahul Gandhi, Congress leader

‘Hum do, humare do’

Rural economy will be destroyed and the country will not be able to generate employment. This is not the first time PM Modi has tried to benefit hum do, humare do. He first did it with demonetisation and then GST.

He did not name anyone, saying everyone knew who he was talking about. His comments resulted in a virtual bedlam in the House, with allegations flying against his (Gandhi) family and Union Minister Anurag Thakur, accusing him of “telling lies” and coming unprepared to speak on Union Budget.

“The PM has given us three options — hunger, unemployment and suicide,” said Rahul, amid repeated disruptions and requests by Speaker Om Birla to restrict his speech to the Budget. Rahul did not take their names but Union Minister Pralhad Joshi, who raised the point of order and asked him to prove his claims, ended taking the names of two corporates.

“Let me tell what will happen when these laws are enacted. Small farmers and traders will be wiped out and only ‘hum do hamare do’ will run the country,” said the Congress leader.

“Do not think it is farmers’ agitation alone. It is the agitation of the entire country. Farmers are showing way to the country, which is rising against ‘hum do, hamare do’….Let me give you in writing. Farmers will not move back an inch. You will have to take back the three laws,” warned the Congress leader.


A school for ragpickers, poor bringing a lot of cheer in Ghazipur

A school for ragpickers, poor bringing a lot of cheer in Ghazipur

Nirdesh Singh, a social activist, talking to children at Savitribai Phule Pathshala at the Ghazipur border farmers’ protest site, in New Delhi. Tribune photo: Manas Ranjan Bhui

Vinayak Padmadeo
Tribune News Service

Ghazipur, February 10

Mata Savitribai Phule Mahasabha (MSPM) tent is attracting a lot of attention from the crowd in Ghazipur.

Over 30 children, mostly rag pickers and children of guards from the nearby colonies and a few from farming families sitting in protest are making a big ruckus as they repeat numbers and alphabets in chorus.

The noise quotient is bringing a number of curious onlookers to the tent.

The Savitribai Phule Pathshala has been running at the Ghazipur protest site since January 22.

The pupils — their numbers fluctuate from 30 to 60 daily — started off with a great difficulty as the Andolan Committee weren’t keen on having a school at a protest site.

The indifference notwithstanding, the school is not only prospering, it is bringing a lot of change in the lifestyle of these young students in terms of their keenness to learn and also towards their personal hygiene.

“Initially we couldn’t see the colours on their clothes. They were all covered in dirt,” said Nirdhesh Singh, who runs the school along with three other teachers.

“Now they have all started to work towards cleanliness and personal hygiene. Nowadays they troop in well before the start of the school,” Singh, who had to initially lure these children with candies and other treats to bring them anywhere near a white board, said.

“Madam I haven’t got my notebook yet. You have to give me two books as well,” Shabbo, who is seven, asked Limdevi Maurya, who took the class on Tuesday.

Karthik, 10, whose father is a guard in the nearby Gaursons apartment, was in attendance.

Kunal Pradhan, 8, a student of Balvidya Public School, said, “Sir mera school lockdown se band hai, isliye aata hun (my school is shut since lockdown that’s why I come).”

Young Jamshed, whose father Jawaid is a rickshaw puller, has been a regular attendant.

“Bahut accha lagta hai (It feels really good),” he says.

Nirdhesh, who is also the national president of MSPM, said the organisation works for the poor and downtrodden in Uttar Pradesh and when they joined the protest only then this idea of running a school came about.

“We run a campaign for de-addiction and suggest to take up education to prosper,” she explained.

“Nobody is bothered about the lifestyle of poor. So it was important for us to show these children that they are also a part of our society. And that’s how this school came into being,” she added.

Besides pupils, the school has also started to attract attention of teachers like Limdevi, who has travelled all the way to the protest site from Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

“I came here yesterday,” Maurya said.

“Today was my first day. I enjoyed it thoroughly. And it helped that these children already know the numbers and alphabets,” she added.


My statement on LAC transgressions was distorted: VK Singh

My statement on LAC transgressions was distorted: VK Singh

Union Minister and former Army chief General VK Singh. File photo

New Delhi, February 10

Union Minister and former Army chief General VK Singh (Retd) on Wednesday said his statement on transgressions by the Indian troops on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) was distorted that gave China a platform to try and “cover their own aggressive tracks”.

Singh’s comment about Indian troops crossing the LAC had sparked a war of words between the two countries prompting Beijing to blame New Delhi for the military tension at the borders.

The minister also lashed out at the newspaper ‘The Indian Express’ for carrying out a sustained campaign against him.

“For almost a decade, ever since I was the COAS, the Indian Express has launched a sustained campaign against me. A misinformation campaign that sometimes bordered on the bizarre, as was the case with the now infamous coup story, have repeatedly hit the headlines,” he said.

Singh was referring to a news article carried by the daily on April 4, 2012 titled ‘The January night Raisina Hill was spooked: Two key Army units moved towards Delhi without notifying Govt’.

Clarifying his remarks in Madurai on Sunday, the minister said he was purported to have said “India has been transgressing the LAC with China, five times to everyone ingress of theirs”.

“This distortion could not be further from the truth. I had simply stated the established fact that the borders along the LAC have not been demarcated and until that is done there will always be differing perceptions,” Singh tweeted.

The minister also added that the fact is that the People’s Republic of China has refused to settle the border as part of the bullying tactics they have adopted.

He said that Indian side is aware of these tactics and any aggression will be responded to with equal or greater level as was the case in Galwan.

Singh pointed out that in the race to create sensational headlines, newspaper editors must verify what was said and what is reported.

“The distortion of my statement/reply has needlessly given the Chinese a platform to try and cover their own aggressive tracks and shift the blame on India,” he said.

In Tamil Nadu’s Madurai on February 7, Singh, while addressing the media at a Circuit House, had said that China has transgressed into India many times over the years with its own perception of the LAC.

“But none of you come to know how many times we have transgressed, as per our perception. The Indian government does not announce it, while the Chinese media does not cover it,” he said.

“Let me assure you, if China has transgressed 10 times, we must have done it at least 50 times,” Singh claimed.

China reacted to Singh’s statement and its foreign ministry called it “an unwitting confession”.

According to the statement published on the Chinese foreign ministry’s website on February 8, spokesperson Wang Wenbin reacted to Singh’s statement and blamed India for the ongoing border conflict along the LAC in eastern Ladakh.

“This is unwitting confession by the Indian side. For a long time, the Indian side has conducted frequent acts of trespass in the border area in an attempt to encroach on China’s territory and constantly created disputes and frictions which is the root cause of the tensions at the China-India border,” said the Chinese foreign ministry. — IANS