Sanjha Morcha

Corps Commander to raise Galwan violence with China & seek status quo in Pangong, other areas

The meeting between Lt Gen. Harinder Singh and his Chinese counterpart began Monday morning at Chushul-Moldo meeting point on the Chinese side of the LAC.

File image of Indian soldiers in Ladakh | By special arrangement

New Delhi: Lieutenant General Harinder Singh, the 14 Corps Commander, will Monday raise the issue of the brutal violence by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) last week in Galwan Valley, Ladakh, and also seek restoration of status quo in Pangong Lake, the Hot Spring area, among others, where the Chinese have intruded.

The meeting between Lt Gen. Singh and his Chinese counterpart Major Gen. Lin Liu, the commander of the South Xinjiang Military District, began at 11.30 am at Chushul-Moldo meeting point on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

Sources in the know said Lt Gen Singh will raise the issue of the “premeditated and planned action” that led to the death of 20 Indian soldiers and injuries to several others.

China has still not confirmed the casualties on their side, but sources said “a number” of PLA soldiers suffered fatal casualties and injuries in the attack.

While the incident happened on Indian territory, the Chinese have gone back into their territory in the Galwan Valley.

This is the second meeting at the Corps Commander-level since the tensions broke out in early May.

Also read: India uses AIR Chinese service to broadcast commentary on Galwan ‘transgression’ by China


Restoration of status quo ante

Sources said another issue that will be discussed is the restoration of status quo ante in areas, which have witnessed transgressions by the Chinese, especially along Pangong Lake where the Chinese have come to Finger 4 from their base in Srijap.

For India, the LAC is at the Finger 8 after the 1962 war when the Chinese captured Srijap that was earlier controlled by India. The restoration of the status quo as of early April is the only way to reduce tensions.

As reported by ThePrint, the government has changed the rules of engagement at the LAC and the new rules do not bind the security personnel from using force, including firearms in exceptional situations, to counter the Chinese aggression and transgressions.

India has moved in over two division strength-level additional men and equipment into eastern Ladakh, which includes artillery and mechanised columns.

The Indian Air Force has also brought in Apache attack helicopters, Chinook heavy-lift choppers, besides increasing Combat Air Patrol.

While the Navy has moved additional warships into the Indian Ocean as a precautionary measure, sources said the Navy’s long-range surveillance aircraft, P8I, has also been deployed to carry out recce in the region.


Also read: China’s on India’s side in Pangong, Hot Springs. ‘Difference in perception’ line suits it


 


How Indian troops chased the Chinese for a kilometre over LAC in Galwan on 15 June night

Representational image | Soham Sen | ThePrint

New Delhi: It was a combination of “treachery” and breaking the terms of an agreement by the Chinese that led to the violent face-off in the Galwan Valley on the night of 15 June that left 20 Indian soldiers dead and several injured, ThePrint has learnt.

However, it was not a one-sided battle and the night witnessed an over 1-kilometre-long chase by the men from 16 Bihar Regiment and other units as the Chinese ran back to the safety of their units posted just across the Line of Actual Control (LAC), sources said.

ThePrint has spoken to a number of individuals in the know and has been able to construct a sequence of events that eventually ended with the Chinese being pushed back from the Indian territory that they briefly intruded into by a kilometre at the mouth of the Galwan Valley.


Also read: Galwan Valley has been & will always be India’s, says grandson of explorer it’s named after


Before 15 June: A military agreement

The events of last Monday night occurred along the Galwan River, which originates from Aksai Chin, and reaches the Shyok river, also known as the river of death. There is a particular point at which the Galwan river takes a sharp turn left and later meets the Shyok.

Patrol Point 14 (PP 14) is just ahead of this confluence of the Shyok-Galwan river.

Indian troops have traditionally patrolled till PP 14 but has never built a camp or any structure in accordance with the understanding between the two sides at the local level.

Similarly, the Chinese also patrol up to PP 14 from time to time. This is also the spot where the two sides meet to talk.

Early May, a Chinese tent was spotted at PP 14. This is deemed to be in Indian territory and the Indians challenged this construction in May itself and also confronted a group of Chinese soldiers who were attempting to trek down to the Shyok river.

Sources said that the Chinese later dismantled its tent and went back to their side beyond PP 14.

However, both sides had built up troops and were literally in a stand-off at PP 14.

After the 6 June meeting between 14 Corps Commander Lt Gen. Harinder Singh and his Chinese counterpart Major General Lin Liu, commander of the South Xinjiang Military District, it was decided that both sides will fall back by about 2 kilometres from their current positions at PP 14.

Accordingly, Indian troops moved behind and the Chinese did too.

However, sources said that a few days later, India found that the Chinese had reneged on the agreement and erected two fresh tents on a slope, including one which was suspected to be an observation point.

The Chinese were repeatedly asked to remove them and Indian troops forcefully dismantled one of the two tents and set it on fire on Sunday, 14 June.


Also read: Want to help Indian soldiers at LAC? Stop spreading assumptions about Galwan clash


On 15 June: The big fight

On 15 June, the Commanding Officer of the 16 Bihar Regiment, Col Santosh Babu, held talks with his Chinese counterpart at PP 14. It was decided that both sides would strictly adhere to the 6 June decisions, which would also mean that the Chinese would have to remove the structure on the slope.

At around 7 pm that night, as reported by ThePrint, Colonel Santosh along with a small group of officers and personnel went up to PP 14 to check if the Chinese had kept up their end of the agreement.

This is where the account blurs. Some sources say initially a Major and some non-commissioned officers (NCOs) had gone to PP 14 and were taken hostage, but others say it was Colonel Babu who went.

What is confirmed is that Col Santosh had about 40 other personnel with him, including officers and unit videographers, when he neared PP 14.

Seeing the tent still present, the CO asked his men to remove the tent. A small group of Chinese soldiers then came forward and began a verbal spat.

Sources said this slowly turned into pushing and shoving. At this time, the Indians outnumbered the Chinese.

This continued for about half an hour, and during the melee, the temporary structure was dismantled.

However, a larger group of Chinese soldiers came to the spot armed with iron rods, stones and even sticks with nails and barbed wires on them.

The Chinese had the tactical advantage here in terms of numbers, weapons and the geography.

The Chinese attacked the Indian soldiers and the Commanding Officer (CO) was hurt since he was at the forefront.

He fell in the icy cold waters of the Galwan River below even as the soldiers fought back with the sticks they were carrying.

The attack on the CO fired up the soldiers, who managed to wrangle the weapons being used by the Chinese away from them and turned it on them. They even fought with sheer physical force, the sources said.

“This was treachery by the Chinese. The attack on the Indian team was planned. The CO had gone there with his men in good faith because talks were held in a positive atmosphere during the day,” a source said.

Sources said that since the fight was happening over a ledge, many soldiers from both sides fell into the icy cold river water.

They added that of the 20 dead on the Indian side, about eight died directly as a result of hypothermia because they had injured themselves by falling on the rocks in the river below. It was Tuesday morning by the time a rescue was possible.

As the Indian side found out about the fight breaking out, back up was rushed in. This included troops from the 16 Bihar and other units that were posted in the area due to the stand off.

The names of these unit are not being disclosed for security and tactical reasons.

While more Indian soldiers armed with sticks rushed in, the Chinese threw stones and rolled down bigger stones onto the Indian team.

In the hand-to-hand combat, many Chinese soldiers were grievously injured, the sources said.

Such was the confusion at this point that each side pelting stones was also hitting their own soldiers.

“The area of the main fight was very narrow. In the melee, at one particular section, the Chinese were again overwhelmed by the Indian troops and they ran off to the main area of PP 14 behind which there was Chinese build up,” a source said.

A group of Indian soldiers chased them and crossed over what is the Line of Actual Control (LAC), an undrawn line.

It is here that 10 Indian soldiers were held captive since the Chinese had a bigger build-up, sources said.

The fight continued for several hours into the darkness till it subsided with both sides pulling apart.


Also read: Galwan clash is a turning point as Indian soldiers give Chinese a bloody nose


16 June: The morning after

In the morning, both sides decided to halt the fight and rescue the injured and take away bodies.

Some of the soldiers who ended up in custody on the other side were returned following the Major General level talks near PP 14.

Both sides made sure that the injured were taken care of.

However, it was only on Thursday that the Chinese returned the 10 who had crossed over the LAC in the chase.

“It was a clash that began with Chinese treachery. It was a clash of great heroism of the troops posted there who fought back the Chinese and taught the Chinese a lesson not to mess with India,” a source said.

Since the Monday clash, the Chinese have withdrawn from the Indian territory at PP 14 and have gone back to their side in accordance with the decisions taken on 6 June.

The Indians too have gone back but have maintained a strict vigil. The future talks, including the one held on 22 June, will focus on more de-escalation and will follow a policy of specifying how many troops will be at what distance from the LAC, besides new patrolling tactics.


Also read: China has an Achilles’ heel. India must take the battle there from LAC


India & China agree to step-wise de-escalation in eastern Ladakh, including Pangong

Indian and Chinese soldiers during a military exercise in Meghalaya last year | Representational image | ANI

New Delhi: India and China have agreed on “step-wise mutual disengagement” from all areas of friction in Eastern Ladakh, including the main point of concern at Pangong Lake, ThePrint has learnt.

The decision was taken following Monday’s nearly-11-hour talks between 14 Corps Commander Lt Gen. Harinder Singh and his Chinese counterpart Major General Lin Liu, commander of the South Xinjiang Military District.

According to sources in the Army, the Corps Commander-level talks between India and China at Chushul-Moldo were held “in a cordial, positive and constructive atmosphere”.

“There was a mutual consensus to disengage. Modalities for disengagement from all friction areas in Eastern Ladakh were discussed and will be taken forward by both the sides,” one of the sources said.

Speaking to ThePrint, another set of sources said the disengagement will be step-wise and take place over a period of time.

“There would be gradual de-escalation that would take place. The forces will move back a particular distance in all areas of friction. This would be different for each location,” a source told ThePrint.

This, the source said, means that disengagement numbers will vary with place and time.

“At an X date, both sides will have to reduce the number of personnel by an X amount and go back by an X distance. This cycle would be done again according to the schedule agreed,” the source added.

Army sources said that more meetings will be held at levels below that of the corps commander to ensure that disengagement takes place smoothly and according to schedule. The sources remained tight-lipped about the exact withdrawal schedule, saying it was a matter of operational secrecy.


Also Read: Xi has thrown the gauntlet at Modi. He can pick it up like Nehru, or try something new


‘No repeat of Galwan’

According to sources, Lt Gen. Singh raised the issue of the Galwan clash last Monday that led to the death of 20 Indian soldiers and injuries to several others. Sources said steps will be taken by both sides to ensure such an incident is not repeated.

The meeting between the two Corps Commanders started at 11.30 am and ended only around 10.30 pm.

Sources said the two commanders were assisted by a number of officials who thrashed out details for specific points.

The meeting was held at the Chushul-Moldo point on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC). It was the second one at this level since tensions began early May. There has been massive mobilisation of troops and firepower on both sides since.

Sources said the disengagement plan included the Pangong Area, where the Chinese have come in by about eight km until Finger 4, which is in Indian territory. The LAC lies at Finger 8.


Also Read: 1954 Panchsheel pact to Galwan Valley ‘violence’ — India-China relations in last 7 decades

 


Havildar killed in Pakistan shelling

Havildar killed in Pakistan shelling

Our Correspondent

Rajouri, June 22

An Army Havildar was killed in heavy shelling by Pakistan troops along the Line of Control (LoC) in the Kalal area of Nowshera sector in Rajouri district today.

Havildar Dipak Karki, who was guarding a forward post, was critically injured and later succumbed to injuries. He is the fourth soldier to have lost his life in truce violation by Pakistan along the LoC this month.

The Pakistan army resorted to unprovoked shelling using mortars on Indian forward posts and civil areas around 3.30 am. Sources said artillery fire was used to target forward posts.

“The intensity of shelling was very high and people had to run for cover,” said Ramesh Choudhry, sarpanch of Deeing-Kalal.

The Pakistan army also initiated unprovoked shelling in Krishna Ghati (Poonch) this morning. “At both places, the Indian Army retaliated befittingly. Havildar Dipak Karki, who suffered critical injuries later attained martyrdom,” said Defence PRO Lt Col Devender Anand.


China dismisses questions on its casualties in Galwan Valley clash Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said: “I have no information to offer.”

China dismisses questions on its casualties in Galwan Valley clash

China has summarily dismissed all questions on casualties it suffered in the clash with India. Image only for representational purposes

Arun Joshi
Jammu, June 23

China has summarily dismissed all questions on casualties it suffered in the clash with India in Galwan last week and has maintained that it has no information on the matter.

In contrast, India had given out the number and names of the 20 soldiers it lost, including a Commanding officer, hours after the incident that broke decades-old protocol at LAC.

Also read: Army chief to visit Ladakh today to assess LAC situation

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian, at his routine press briefing on Monday, dismissed the question of Chinese casualties, saying, “I have no information to offer.”

Replying to a question on the Chinese casualties in the clashes, he said: “China and India are resolving the issue on the ground through military and diplomatic channels. I have no information to offer.”

This two-sentence long statement reflects the Chinese reluctance to spell out its casualties. It is now more than a week since the incident and China has not acknowledged the number of deaths and injuries of its soldiers. This is line with the country’s tradition of keeping casualties under wraps, fearing public outcry and the damage to the image of the ‘strong leadership’ that claims to lead the country.

The military commander-level talks at Chushul–Moldo led by Indian army’s 14 Corps Commander Lt. Gen. Harinder Singh and Chinese Commander Major General Lin Liu were underway at the time of Lijian’s briefing.

This statement came at a time when reports suggested that 43 Chinese soldiers and a commander died in the clashes.

Hu Xijin, editor of Global Times, a mouthpiece of Chinese Communist Party, had tweeted on June 16: “Based on what I know, the Chinese side also suffered casualties in the Galwan Valley physical clash.”

Xijin’s comments were understood as an admission of the casualties on the Chinese side.

Hu, however, added: Chinese side didn’t release the number of PLA casualties in the clash with Indian soldiers. My understanding is the Chinese side doesn’t want people of the two countries to compare the casualties number so to avoid stoking public mood. This is goodwill from Beijing.”

 


CRPF man, 2 militants killed in south Kashmir gunfight The encounter is still under way

CRPF man, 2 militants killed in south Kashmir gunfight

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, June 23

A CRPF jawan and two militants were killed in a gunfight in south Kashmir’s Pulwama district on Tuesday, police said.

They said a cordon and search operation was launched at Bandzoo Pulwama after an input about the presence of militants.

“As joint forces of police, Army and CRPF were carrying out search in the area, an encounter broke out with the hiding militants. In the gunfight, two militants were killed and a head constable of the CRPF was critically injured. The CRPF jawan of 182 Battalion was taken to hospital where he succumbed to his injuries,” a police officer said.

Two AK rifles have been recovered from the encounter site.

The CRPF head constable has been identified as Sunil Kale of Solapur in Maharashtra.

The identity of the militants is being ascertained.

The officer said the operation is under way.


Brig Ganguly to be security adviser to Punjab police Officer is a specialist in counter-terrorism

Brig Ganguly to be security adviser to Punjab police

He will be tasked with training, equipping and employment of special operations group and other specialised units of the police.

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, June 22

The Council of Ministers today gave approval to the appointment of a retired Army officer, Brig Gautam Ganguly, as the Security Adviser in the rank of DIG in the Punjab Police for three years. He will be given a monthly remuneration of the last pay drawn at the time of retirement minus the pension admissible to the officer.

He will be tasked with training, equipping and employment of special operations group and other specialised units of the police. With a stint as the Force Commander in the National Security Guard, Ganguly has headed operations for counter-terrorism, counter-hijacking, VIP security of key installations, the agenda item tabled in today’s Cabinet said.


Army chief reaches Ladakh to assess LAC situation Will take field commanders’ feedback on talks; violent clash with China at Galwan Valley had left 20 Indian soldiers dead

Army chief reaches Ladakh to assess LAC situation

Gen MM Naravane interacts with the soldiers at the Military Hospital in Leh on Tuesday.

Arun Joshi
Jammu, June 23

Army chief Gen MM Naravane reached Leh on Tuesday on his two-day visit to Ladakh to assess the ground situation close to the LAC between Indian and Chinese troops that the world sees as a new flashpoint in the region between two nuclear-powered nations, especially after a violent clash at Galwan Valley on June 15.

The brutal clash in Galwan Valley surrounded by the barren mountains and jagged peaks had left 20 Indian soldiers, including a commanding officer, dead. The incident for which India and China blamed each other took place at the LAC after a gap of more than four decades.

Also read: China dismisses questions on its casualties in Galwan Valley clash

This is Gen Naravane’s first visit to Ladakh in recent weeks, especially after the stand-off began in the first week of May.

Gen Naravane’s visit comes at a time when the Indian and Chinese troops have strengthened their positions along the LAC amidst the two rounds of talks at the military commander level. The talks seek reversal of the hostilities on the border that intensified after the June 15 clashes in Galwan Valley in eastern Ladakh.

The army chief, sources said, would take a micro and macro look at the situation and seek real-time information and strategies to be adopted to deal with the situation at the LAC. He would also focus on the strategies that would make China retreat its troops to the positions that they held before April this year.

The face-offs had started in first week of May and they escalated to a bloody clash in Galwan Valley on June 15. That incident put back the progress of the military commander-level talks held on June 6. That position was sought to be retrieved in the June 22 talks in which, sources said, a forward movement seemed to have been achieved, though the details are quite hazy at the moment.

“The army chief’s visit should be seen as a move to boost the morale of the troops and also share the resolve of the country to stand by them,” sources said.


Indian, Chinese militaries agree to disengage from friction points in eastern Ladakh, PTI quotes sources

The talks were held in a ‘cordial, positive and constructive atmosphere’ and it was decided that modalities for disengagement from all areas in eastern Ladakh would be taken forward by both the sides

Indian, Chinese militaries agree to disengage from friction points in eastern Ladakh, PTI quotes sources

New Delhi, June 23

In a positive move, Indian and Chinese armies have arrived at a consensus to “disengage” from all friction points in eastern Ladakh at a marathon meeting of top military commanders of the two sides on Monday, official sources said.

The talks were held in a “cordial, positive and constructive atmosphere” and it was decided that modalities for disengagement from all areas in eastern Ladakh would be taken forward by both the sides, they said.

The Indian delegation at the nearly 11-hour talks was led by Lt Gen Harinder Singh, the commander of the 14 Corps, while the Chinese side was headed by Commander of the Tibet Military District Maj Gen Liu Lin.

The talks were held in the midst of escalating tension between the two countries following the killing of 20 Indian Army personnel by China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in a violent clash in Galwan Valley on June 15.

India termed the incident as a “premeditated and planned action” by the Chinese troops.

“There was a mutual consensus to disengage. Modalities for disengagement from all friction areas in eastern Ladakh were discussed and will be taken forward by both the sides,” said a source.

In the meeting, the Indian delegation strongly raised the “premeditated” assault by Chinese troops on Indian soldiers in the Galwan Valley and demanded immediate withdrawal of Chinese troops from all areas in eastern Ladakh where the two militaries are on a standoff, people familiar with the development said.

The Indian side also suggested bringing down the number of troops by both sides in their rear bases along the Line of Actual Control, the 3,500 km de-facto border, they said.

The first round of the Lt Gen-level talks were held on June 6 during which both sides finalised an agreement to disengage gradually from all standoff points beginning with Galwan Valley.

However, the situation in the region deteriorated following the Galwan Valley clashes as the two sides significantly bolstered their deployments in most areas.

On Sunday, the government gave the armed forces “full freedom” to give a “befitting” response to any Chinese misadventure along the LAC.

The Army has already sent thousands of additional troops to forward locations along the border in the last one week. The IAF has also moved a sizeable number of its frontline Sukhoi 30 MKI, Jaguar, Mirage 2000 aircraft and Apache attack helicopters to several key air bases, including Leh and Srinagar, following the clashes.

The talks on Monday were held at the Moldo meeting point on Chinese side of Chushul sector in eastern Ladakh and it is learnt that the China’s PLA asked for the meeting. The Lt General-level meeting of June 6 was also sought by the Chinese side.

After the Galwan Valley clash, the two sides held at least three rounds of talks to explore ways to bring down tension.

The two armies were engaged in a standoff in Galwan and several other areas of eastern Ladakh since May 5 when their troops clashed on the banks of the Pangong Tso.

The situation in eastern Ladakh deteriorated after around 250 Chinese and Indian soldiers were engaged in a violent face-off on May 5 and 6. The incident in Pangong Tso was followed by a similar incident in north Sikkim on May 9.

Prior to the clashes, both sides had been asserting that pending the final resolution of the boundary issue, it was necessary to maintain peace and tranquillity in the border areas. PTI


How China has overplayed its hand, writes Baijayant ‘Jay’ Panda

China has sought to contain India with its patronage of Pakistan since the 1950s

China has sought to contain India with its patronage of Pakistan since the 1950s(AFP)

Almost 2,500 years ago, Greek historian, Thucydides, wrote of the devastating Peloponnesian War, “What made war inevitable was the growth of Athenian power and the fear which this caused in Sparta.” There have been other such conflicts in history between established powers and rising ones, not all of which resulted in war. The same theme is playing out today, in the tensions between the United States (US) and China, and China and India.

In his provocative 2017 book, Destined For War: Can America & China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?,Harvard University professor Graham Allison was not optimistic. He wrote, “When one great power threatens to displace another, war is almost always the result”, citing 16 such conflicts in history, of which only four navigated the transition without war.

Nevertheless, war is not inevitable. Among successful examples cited by Allison, the following two are instructive. First, when a century ago, the US overtook the United Kingdom (UK) as the world’s pre-eminent superpower. It took accommodation by the established power, the UK, as well as statesmanship and negotiating skills on both sides.

A second approach involved a different strategy, where the established power, the US and the contender, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) were continually attempting to contain each other for decades, but did not go to war. The Cold War, in that sense, was one of the great successes of the modern era in avoiding all-out war. That was a good thing, considering that nuclear weapons were part of the equation for the first time in superpower conflicts. The US approach to the rise of China had essentially been like that first approach —the UK vs the US— for decades, but has recently been decidedly shifting towards the second strategy, that of the US vs the USSR. China’s approach towards India has always been like the latter.

The US accommodation of China began with the Richard Nixon administration in the early 1970s, at the height of its rivalry with the USSR, when China was an impoverished developing nation. It stemmed from self-interest, of course, not least to counter the USSR, but also to develop a big new market for American products and a source of cheap imports. Earlier American administrations tried the same with India, but failed to crack India’s Nehruvian disdain for free markets and post-colonial suspicion of the West.

There was also a belief in the West, now belied, that as China prospered, it would also become less autocratic and a more open society. While the relationship was mutually beneficial for decades, in recent years, it has soured considerably. As China became the third largest and then the second-largest economy after the US, it progressively stopped playing by the rules from which it had itself benefited, and, in fact, started flexing both economic and military muscles. Nixon himself, long after ceasing to be president, said of China, “We may have created a Frankenstein’s monster.”

China’s approach towards India was always about containment. Right from the 1940s, as both emerged into a new, post-colonial, post-World War II era, it has viewed India as a long-term competitor that must be checked. Thus, its relentless focus on keeping India under pressure, and slowing down its resurgence, from every possible angle, using every possible tool at hand.

China’s India-containment strategy was clear since its early patronage of Pakistan from the 1950s. It has continued to exploit that benighted nation as a client-state, primarily to act as a brake on India. Then, while establishing a detente on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India for nearly half-a-century, China began leveraging its fast-growing economy to implement the “string of pearls” strategy to encircle India from south-east Asia to Africa. This has recently seen sharp acceleration, with the Belt and Road Initiative projects such as Hambantota and Gwadar ports in Sri Lanka and Pakistan, and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor running right through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Most significantly, China has feverishly stepped up its attempts to cultivate Pakistan-like client states among India’s immediate neighbours, as recent developments in Nepal have shown. Furthermore, as covered in the previous edition of this column, in recent years China has also begun asserting itself globally, raising the hackles of nations near and far.

India has also been changing. It had earlier wasted decades of LAC detente (when “no bullet was fired in anger, no life was lost”) by being laggardly about fortifying its border defences, unlike the Chinese. That has changed dramatically since 2014, with huge increases in infrastructure expenditure in border states, both civilian and defence. As many commentators have noted, the recent rapid scaling up of infrastructure on India’s side of the LAC was one of the key triggers for the current clash, with China wanting to intimidate India from trying to achieve parity. The Modi government has also taken similar steps abroad, for instance, by finally commissioning Chabahar port in Iran after decades of delay.

This time, China has badly overplayed its hand, and been shocked by India’s determined resistance. The Modi doctrine is clearly rooted in Kautilyan principles. Unlike his predecessors, he will not be complacent with defences because of opponents’ words of peace. He will seek peace like them, but maintain it from a patient, gradually-built position of strength.

Baijayant “Jay” Panda is the national vice-president, BJP
The views expressed are personal