Sanjha Morcha

India summons Pakistan chargé d’affaires to lodge ‘strong protest’

India on Monday summoned Pakistan’s Chargé d’affaires Syed Haider Shah “to lodge strong protest at the recent acts of vandalism and desecration of the holy Gurdwara Sri Janam Asthan at Nankana Sahib, Pakistan, and the targeted killing of a minority Sikh community member in Peshawar, Pakistan”.

sikh youth killed in peshawar, peshawar sikh killed, sikh youth killed in pakistan, Parvinder Singh murder peshawar, sikhs in pakistan, Gurudwara Nankana Sahib attack, Gurudwara Nankana Sahib vandalism, pakistan news

The MEA said India shared with Shah “strong concerns raised by members of civil society, parliamentarians and others at the continued persecution of religious and ethnic minorities in Pakistan, including the recent despicable and heinous acts”.

The war of words between India and Pakistan over the treatment of minorities in the two countries continued on Monday, with India summoning a senior diplomat over the “targeted killing” of a member of the Sikh community and the attack on the Nankana Sahib Gurudwara and Pakistan issuing a statement that accused India of not protecting minorities from “saffron terror”.

India on Monday summoned Pakistan’s Chargé d’affaires Syed Haider Shah “to lodge strong protest at the recent acts of vandalism and desecration of the holy Gurdwara Sri Janam Asthan at Nankana Sahib, Pakistan, and the targeted killing of a minority Sikh community member in Peshawar, Pakistan”.

The MEA said India shared with Shah “strong concerns raised by members of civil society, parliamentarians and others at the continued persecution of religious and ethnic minorities in Pakistan, including the recent despicable and heinous acts”. It said Pakistan’s government was “called upon to ensure safety, security, and welfare of the members of the minority communities in Pakistan, including their places of worship, and take immediate measures to expeditiously bring the perpetrators of such despicable and heinous acts to justice”.

sikh youth killed in peshawar, peshawar sikh killed, sikh youth killed in pakistan, Parvinder Singh murder peshawar, sikhs in pakistan, Gurudwara Nankana Sahib attack, Gurudwara Nankana Sahib vandalism, pakistan news The deceased has been identified as Ravinder Singh (pic), who is the brother of first Sikh news anchor in Pakistan, Harmeet Singh. (Source: ANI)

This is the third such statement issued by India within a week. Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on Monday to reject the “Indian propaganda”. The statement said the “BJP government’s mischievous portrayal of isolated incidents in Peshawar and Nankana Sahib as alleged ‘persecution’ of minorities is part of its smear campaign” and that it is a “desperate attempt to divert attention from ongoing state terrorism” in Jammu and Kashmir and “systematic discrimination against minorities in India”.

It said it “completely rejects these fabrications, which will in no way shield the BJP government from opprobrium by the international community on “the adverse fallout of the discriminatory Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens”.


CDS Rawat to attend key meet on Jan 13

HT Correspondent

letters@hindustantimes.com

NEW DELHI : General Bipin Rawat will attend his first Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) meeting in his new role as the Chief of Defence Staff on January 17, a senior government officer said on Monday.

Rawat took over as India’s first CDS on December 31.

The DAC, headed by the defence minister, is India’s top defence procurement body that evaluates and green lights acquisition proposals made by the armed forces.

Other members of the council are the minister of state for defence, the three service chiefs, the defence secretary, secretary defence research and development, secretary defence production and director general, acquisition. As Chief of Defence Staff, Rawat holds the charge of permanent chairman, chiefs of staff committee — a panel consisting of the three service chiefs.

One of Rawat’s key responsibilities as CDS is to promote the use of indigenous equipment by the services at a time when the armed forces are heavily dependent on imported military hardware.

As CDS, he heads the department of military affairs and is also principal military adviser to the defence minister on all matters related to the tri-services.

He has taken over as Chief of Defence Staff at a time when the three services are facing a worrying fund shortage that could derail some of their modernisation efforts.


After attack, students rise in solidarity

After attack, students rise in solidarityoutrage Hundreds of AMU students take out a tricolour march in UP, protesters in Kolkata organise a torch rally and block roads, while IIT-M students stage demonstrations; ABVP carries out counter rallies
Members of various student organisations protest against JNU violence, at the Aligarh Muslim University on Monday. ani

HT Correspondents

letters@hindustantimes.com

New Delhi : Students on Monday staged protests on campuses across the country against the violence in New Delhi’s premier Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on Sunday night that left at least 30 people injured and provoked outrage. No incident of violence was reported during the protests.

In Uttar Pradesh, hundreds of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) students took out a Tiranga, or tricolour march, on the university campus in solidarity with JNU . Members of the AMU Teachers Association also joined the march to condemn the violence on the JNU campus, where masked assailants attacked students with sticks and rods.

Former AMU Students’ Union vice-president Hamza Sufiyan blamed the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the students’ wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), for the attack on JNU students. “They must be booked. The government is booking people for protesting… it must lodge cases against the people who have gone inside a university campus and beaten up students and vandalised the premises,” he said.

The ABVP held counter rallies on several campuses and blamed Leftist students for the violence in JNU. It claimed that the ABVP activists were also targeted.

Protests were also reported from the Banaras Hindu University and the Allahabad University, the two other central universities in Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow University vice chancellor AK Rai said there was “no law and order problem” on the varsity campus even as he refused to comment on the mob attack on the JNU campus.

Students from West Bengal’s Jadavpur University (JU) and the Presidency University (PU) belonging to the Left-wing organisations and ruling Trinamool Congress took out a torch rally and blocked a road in Kolkata soon after the mob attack on Sunday night. A protest was staged outside the PU on Monday.

“Let the ABVP stoop as low as it can but it would not be able to defeat us. All the ABVP members are goons. They earlier proved it in the JU and now at the JNU. Students will put up a united fight against these fascist hooligans,” said Debraj Debnath, a Students’ Federation of India (SFI) leader from the Jadavpur University.

SFI is the students’ wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Rabindra Bharati University vice-chancellor Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury called the attack on the JNU campus dreadful. “I know no words to condemn this repugnant act. This is unimaginable in a civilised country. How could masked outsiders enter the girls’ hostel and what were the security staff doing?” Chaudhury asked. The JU and Calcutta University teachers associations issued separate statements condemning the attack.

In Guwahati, students of the Gauhati University, the Cotton University, and other institutes gathered at the city’s Nehru Park for a protest rally. “The police remained mute spectators to the violence. It seems the goons had indirect support from the government. We fear such incidents could get repeated in other universities,” said Moon Talukdar, the general secretary of the Post-graduate Students’ Union of the Gauhati University.

“The attack on JNU students and teachers was perpetrated by those in power in Delhi with the intention of curbing protests there. It could be an attempt to give a different direction to the protests happening elsewhere with regards to the National Register of Citizens and the Citizenship (Amendment) Act,” said Pranjal Kalita, former general secretary of the Cotton University Students Union. In Tripura, the Left-wing student bodies held protests at separate places.

In Kerala, the functioning of many educational institutions was disrupted due to the SFI’s strike call in protest against the mob attack. The SFI has asked students to boycott classes to protest against “saffron goon” attacks on the premier university. In Bihar, the Patna University Students’ Union president Manish Kumar led a sit-in on campus soon after midnight. “The violence against the JNU students and teachers is shameful. The RSS [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh] is behind it and the organisation needs to be banned,” Kumar said.

Patna University vice-chancellor Rash Bihari Prasad Singh said that the situation was under control. “We are keeping a close watch. So far, there has been no untoward incident reported from anywhere,” he said.

Protests were held in all major educational institutes in Bengaluru, including the Indian Institute of Science and the Bangalore University. Nawaz Mohammed Khan, a student at Bengaluru’s RC College, said they gathered on Sunday night for a protest and some of them were detained briefly. Another RC College student, Elizabeth David, said, “Our protests would continue till action is taken against ABVP.”

Protests were also reported from


Army’s effort to strengthen bond between people

Army’s effort to strengthen bond between people

Tribune News Service

Jammu, January 5

To foster and reinforce brotherhood, harmony and national integration for strengthening the bond between the people of all communities, the Indian Army conducted a Kaumi Ekta Meet at Badhal village in Reasi district.

Holds Kaumi Ekta Meet

  • The Indian Army conducted a Kaumi Ekta Meet at Badhal village in Reasi district to foster and reinforce brotherhood, harmony and national integration for strengthening the bond between the people of all communities
  • Sarpanch, panch express gratitude

The aim was to understand the difficulties of local population and help them in finding reasonable solutions.

The participants of the meet included villagers from nearby villages, officials from the civil administration and the Army. During the meet, a detailed discussion on the subject theme was carried out and all prominent persons took active part in the event.

The gathering was convinced of the fact that the Army was working towards continuous development of the area and its people in all aspects, including infrastructure, social facilities, education, political freedom and religious harmony. As many as 24 locals from Badhal and adjoining areas attended the meet.

Village elders, sarpanch, panch and prominent locals thanked and expressed their profound gratitude towards the Army for organising the meet and taking this noble initiative for locals which will create a positive atmosphere between the Army and the locals.


Burnt body of retd Navy officer found in Thane

Burnt body of retd Navy officer found in Thane

Thane (Maharashtra), January 5

The charred body of a retired naval officer was found in his flat in Badlapur township of Thane district in the early hours of Sunday, the police said. The deceased was identified as Guddu Singh (50).

Singh, who lived in Delhi, had come to Badlapur with his wife three days ago to sell off his flat, said a police officer.

Around 1.30 am, neighbours noticed smoke coming out of the house and alerted the police. After breaking open the door, the police found Singh’s completely burnt body, said senior police inspector LM Sariputra of Badlapur police station. His wife was missing, he said.

The police have registered a case of accidental death and the body has been sent for autopsy, he said. — PTI


States cannot lower fines below prescribed limits under Motor Vehicles Act: Centre

States cannot lower fines below prescribed limits under Motor Vehicles Act: Centre

New Delhi, January 6

No state can lower traffic penalties below the level prescribed under the new Motor Vehicles Act, the central government said on Monday.

In an advisory to states, the road, transport and highways ministry said the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 is a parliamentary legislation and the state governments cannot pass any law or take executive action to lower penalty below the prescribed limit unless President’s assent has been obtained to related state law.

The transport ministry had sought legal advice on this from the law ministry after one of the states had notified amounts for compounding of certain offences lower to what has been prescribed in the new Act.

The new Act with stricter provisions has come into force in the country from September 1, 2019.

“Ministry of Law and Justice has tendered their advice after seeking opinion of Attorney General of India. The Attorney General has inter alia observed as under: “The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended by Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019) is a Parliamentary legislation, the state governments cannot pass any law/take executive action to lower the penalty/fine below that prescribed under the statutory provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, unless the assent of the President is obtained to such state law,” the ministry said in an advisory to states.

The advisory to the principal secretaries of states also mentioned the legal opinion that in case of the failure of states to implement the Act, reference may be made to Article 256 of the Constitution that authorises the Union of India to issue directions to a state as may be necessary for the purpose.

Article 256 provides that the executive power of every state shall be so exercised as to ensure compliance with the laws made by Parliament and any existing laws which apply in that state, and the executive power of the Union shall extend to the giving of such directions to a state as may appear to the Government of India to be necessary for that purpose.

The advisory also quoted Attorney General’s opinion that “the disobedience of these directions could well attract the provisions of Article 356 of the Constitution of India, and one could therefore proceed on the basis that the central law would implicitly be obeyed by the state governments”.

The ministry said the objective of the Act and enhancement of penalties for traffic violations was to ensure greater compliance and enhancing deterrence for violation of traffic rules which is intended to provide for better road safety resulting in reduction of accidents and fatalities on roads.

Earlier, the government had said that for certain offences Gujarat, Karnataka, Manipur and Uttarakhand had reduced the penalties.

Under the amended Act, violations such as drunken driving and dangerous driving attract fines of Rs 10,000 and/or imprisonment of six months to two years.

Penalty for driving without licence was increased to Rs 5,000 from Rs 500 earlier, while riding two-wheeler without helmets will not only attract fine of Rs 1,000 but could lead to suspension of licences for the next three months. — PTI

 


Crazy Trump, don’t think everything is over with my father’s martyrdom, says Iranian commander’s daughter

Crazy Trump, don’t think everything is over with my father’s martyrdom, says Iranian commander’s daughter

Iranians pay homage to Qassem Soleimani and others. AFP

Dubai, January 6

The daughter of the slain commander of Iran’s Quds Force told a huge crowd on Monday at his funeral ceremony in Tehran that the United States and its ally Israel faced a “dark day” for his death.

“Crazy Trump, don’t think that everything is over with my father’s martyrdom,” Zeinab Soleimani said in an address broadcast on state television, after US President Donald Trump ordered an air strike on Friday that killed General Qassem Soleimani. Reuters

 


The options before Iran

The options before Iran

Much admired: Devoted to the revolutionary Islamic cause, Soleimani led the force from the front with courage, making him a hero for large sections of Iranians.

Vivek Katju
Ex-secretary, Ministry of external affairs

President Trump’s decision to order the killing of Gen Qassem Soleimani, the legendary leader of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard’s al-Quds force, in a drone strike in Baghdad on January 3, has domestic political and foreign strategic objectives. The most significant in the former category is to show his decisiveness in protecting US interests even though he stands impeached by the House of Representatives in which the Democrats have a majority. The important element in the latter is to convey to Iran and also US regional allies that he would not hesitate to go where his predecessors have not gone — targeting individuals however high they maybe in the Iranian system, if they cross his red-lines.

After the Ayatollah Khomeini-led Iranian Revolution of 1979, the country’s political and security system became dedicated to protect revolutionary gains against domestic and foreign enemies. While an elected governmental system under a President was established, ultimate power, superseding those of all authorities — executive, legislative and judicial — vested in the Supreme Leader, initially Khomeini himself, and after his death in 1989, in Khamenei. The Supreme Leader chosen by the country’s top Shia clergy for life intervenes on issues he wishes to, and significantly, the Revolutionary Guards who holds the reins of the state’s coercive apparatus work for the Supreme Leader.

The Guards’ external force — al-Quds — is responsible to protect the country’s revolutionary system against foreign forces and spread its influence abroad by all means. It especially focuses on West and Central Asia, and has developed formidable Shia militias in the region which assist Iran in pursuing its agenda. Soleimani led the al-Quds for over two decades, during which he became Khamenei’s favourite and a formidable power-wielder in Iran, and, through Iranian networks, in the region. Dour and taciturn, utterly devoted to the revolutionary Islamic cause, he led the force from the front with courage. All this turned him into a hero for large sections of Iranians. Equally, it earned the al-Quds, and he himself, US ire (both were formally declared terrorists) even though there were no doubt contacts between him and the US in the shadowy terrain of intelligence and subterranean warfare. Certainly, Soleimani had connections with the intelligence services of the region, including India. These ebbed and flowed with circumstance and time.

The US has justified his killing on the claim that he was planning imminent action against US interests and personnel in the region. It has also blamed him for the death of over 600 US defence personnel in the fighting in Iraq. The immediate chain of events which led to the US action began on December 27, when an Iran-backed Shia militia launched rockets against a US base in Kirkuk, in which a US contractor died. Two days later, the US attacked the militia base, killing 25 of its members. In response, the militia breached the security perimeter of the US embassy in Baghdad and destroyed its reception area on December 31. The standoff continued for a full day with US personnel within the embassy building. The US blamed Soleimani for orchestrating the incident and his alleged involvement evoked parallels, within the US system, of the attack on the country’s embassy in Tehran in 1979, and of US diplomats held hostage for 400 days. That cost President Jimmy Carter his second term. Clearly, Trump wanted to demonstrate to the faithful, as the election season begins, that unlike that Democratic Party President, he is no ‘softy’ and is willing to cut off the head of the snake.

Soleimani’s killing is a major step in Trump’s anti-Iran agenda which began with the jettisoning of the Obama nuclear deal. During the campaign, Trump asserted that the deal was harmful to US interests and that Iran had made a fool of the Obama administration in the negotiation. To rub the Democrats even more, Trump tweeted, inter-alia, after the announcement of Soleimani’s death, ‘Iran never won a war but never lost a negotiation.’ Trump has virtually shut the diplomatic door on Iran and has piled on pressure through sanctions and in shoring up the US’s traditional Sunni Arab allies. At this difficult time, it was Soleimani who was keeping Iran very much in the regional game through his actions in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Palestine and through Shia minorities in other regional states.

Iran has reacted with fury and Khamenei has vowed revenge. In a virtually unprecedented step, he has personally chaired a meeting of Iran’s National Security Council to take stock of the situation. Despite the rhetoric, he knows that Iran is in a very difficult situation. Its economy is weak as the sanctions are biting and it cannot risk all-out hostilities with the US. The question therefore before Khamenei is what he can do to assuage anger on the streets and show the region, and the wider world, that Iran can extract a price. On its part, the region and the major powers are anxious that West Asia does not descend into outright turbulence which would impact the energy market and dislocate life on the Arab peninsula. Hence, most countries have had reservations about Trump’s order to kill Soleimani and have urged restraint. Despite this, the risk to US nationals in the region and of attacks against the US and its allies has certainly increased. Also, Iran may take action to upset US-Taliban negotiations, and cause major difficulties for it in Iraq.

Interestingly, in his remarks to the media, Trump indirectly dragged India in the Soleimani matter when he said, ‘Soleimani made the death of innocent people his sick passion, contributing to terrorist plots as far away as New Delhi and London’. For India, this remark was unnecessary.


The officer and his Sahayak

When Major Manekshaw was wounded during World War II, his orderly insisted that the doctor attend to his officer, else he would shoot him. Thus, Sam Manekshaw survived to lead the Army to victory in 1971

The officer and his Sahayak

Lt Gen Harwant Singh (Retd)

IN the military, a soldier is assigned to an officer to attend to his small personal requirements, such as prepare his dress, serve bed tea, keep his room in good order, etc. This sets the officer free to deal with more important issues demanding his attention, more so during operations.

A few years ago, someone thought that the term “orderly” was not in keeping with the democratic norms and decided to rename him as “Sahayak”, though his range of duties and commitments remains the same.

Over time, a strong relationship builds between the officer and his Sahayak. The latter would go to any extent to make his officer comfortable. Thus, an orderly of a Polish officer during World War II would bring hot meals from the enemy kitchen for his officer. He continued with this enterprise for quite some time till one day he was found out and taken prisoner.

When General Musservy came to India to attend the centenary celebrations of his regiment, so did his long-time Sahayak. The two went into a long hug with tears flowing down.

Sahayaks not only attend to the basic needs, but often proffer advice to the officer. While I was working as a staff officer, my Sahayak, finding that I was not regular with the morning physical training, would often lecture me on the need for an officer to remain fit. He continued lecturing me till the annual test of 5-mile run, where I beat him and others in the HQ squadron by a wide margin. After that he never brought up the subject.

During training camps, the officers are accommodated in tents of various sizes, depending on rank. Camp equipment is an essential requirement; such as camp cot, a hurricane lamp, an odd stool or table and in the bath tent, the necessary items like foot board, bucket, mug, stool and a commode, better known as “thunderbox”.

We were at one such camp when a young officer, straight from the academy, arrived late in the evening. He was assigned a tent and a Sahayak. On discovering that the officer had just his bedding and a small box with none of the camp essentials listed above, the Sahayak was in a quandary.

The young officer, after leaving his baggage with his Sahayak, went to the officer’s mess. After dinner, everyone moved to their tents and so did this officer. On opening the flap of his tent, he found that his bedding was neatly laid out on a camp cot, there was a hurricane lamp, stool, a hanger or two and the bathroom was fully equipped with a bucket full of water, “thunderbox”, etc. He felt happy at having come to a regiment where they took such good care of their officers!

He was immersed in these pleasant thoughts when someone shouted that his camp cot was missing and soon more protests were heard. A search commenced and one by one these items were taken away, with this officer helplessly watching. Soon, his bedding was on the grass and there was nothing else left with him.

The officer’s Sahayak remained in the shadow and when every item was taken away, he was overheard telling another Sahayak, “Main taan sub kuch ikattha kar ditta si, par saab kolon sambhaleya hi nahin gaya.” (I had collected everything, but the Sahib could not consolidate his hold on these!)

Finally, when Major Sam Manekshaw was wounded in Burma, during World War II, his orderly carried him to the Medical Aid Post where the doctor declared the patient beyond help and tried to move on to the next wounded soldier. At this, Sam’s orderly insisted that the doctor attend to his officer, else he would shoot him. Thus, Sam Manekshaw survived to lead the Indian Army to victory in 1971.