Sanjha Morcha

Strikes on oil facilities fuel Gulf tensions Maj Gen Ashok K Mehta (retd)

What are the lessons from the lethal strikes on Saudi oil facilities that were forecast and war-gamed in 2012? Sanctions alone will not alter the Iranian regime’s behaviour. The failure of a kinetic response in May/June has emboldened the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to step up the attacks.

Strikes on oil facilities fuel Gulf tensions

Vulnerable: The Saudi regime can’t defend itself despite a military budget of $68 bn.

Maj Gen Ashok K Mehta (retd)
Military commentator

ON September 14, I was in Muscat (Oman) when the Abqaiq refinery and the Khurais oilfield in Saudi Arabia were struck by drones/missiles that reduced Saudi Aramco’s daily oil production by half. One week later, I returned to Muscat to take stock of the devastating aerial strikes that sent oil prices soaring for major importers of Saudi light crude like Japan, South Korea, China and India and assess its strategic impact in the region. In February 2012, I had attended the annual strategic conference at the Interdisciplinary Centre, Herzliya (Israel), where a terrorist strike on oil facilities in Abqaiq was simulated and counter-measures recommended, which obviously went unheeded.

The geography of the region, viewed from Oman, is breathtaking: the Strait of Hormuz sits at the north-western edge of the Gulf of Oman as it enters the Persian Gulf that divides, rather sandwiches Saudi Arabia between Iran to the north and Yemen to the south. The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain girdle the western reaches of the Persian Gulf. The rest of the Middle East — Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Israel — straddles the mighty Euphrates river and the Mediterranean Sea. The Hormuz Strait is a choke point for the movement of oil tankers and shipping in the Persian Gulf via the Gulf of Oman into the Arabian Sea, accounting for 20 per cent of the world’s oil.

Iran-backed Houthi rebels claimed the September 14 aerial strikes with a swarm of 17 missiles and drones that dodged the Saudi air defence network and knocked out 5 per cent of the world’s oil supply of 5.7 million barrels of crude a day. This was a big blow for Saudi Aramco just when  Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, son of King Salman and older half-brother of Prince Mohammad bin Salman, had taken over as Energy Minister, the first time any royal had taken charge of the country’s crown jewels. Aramco claims it has restored half of the lost output and hopes for full restoration by October 14. The stunning success of the not-unexpected precision strikes has unnerved the Saudis, their US allies and other Gulf monarchies in the region. They have unanimously blamed Iran for an act of war, though President Trump has not named the country he despises the most. Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al Jubeir confirmed the source of the attack as ‘not from Yemen but from the north’. Meanwhile, Houthi rebels, in an act of magnanimity, announced a halt to all attacks — drones, missiles and other means — in Saudi Arabia as part of a peace initiative five years after capturing Yemen’s capital Sanaa.Mark Esper, US Defence Secretary, had immediately ordered additional deployment of US troops in Saudi Arabia, including defensive air and missile systems. Trump took to Twitter to declare (on September 14) that our response is “locked and loaded” but “under what terms we will proceed to protect the Saudis, we will have to work out,” adding that “we’d like to avoid war.” Trump’s last five words summed up the US policy on the aerial strikes and the limits to US power. The Trump doctrine, in essence, amounts to bluff and bluster. On May 4, there were four unclaimed attacks on tankers — two Saudi, one Norwegian and one Emirati — transiting the Strait of Hormuz. There was no US response despite noises in the White House that Iran was behind the attacks. Similarly, in June, two more oil tankers were attacked by suspected Iranian patrol boats. Also in June, a $130-million US drone, Global Hawk, was downed over Iran. In July, Iran seized a British ship when British marines tried to stop an Iranian oil tanker. The US was conspicuously inactive during these depredations except in ratcheting up sanctions against Iran and its leaders.

Meanwhile, after Tehran’s latest alleged act of war, Commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRG), Gen Hossein Salami, warned that any country that attacks Iran will become the main battlefield. Tehran displayed remnants of the RQ4-Global Hawk drone that was downed in June, the RQ170 Sentinel drone captured intact in 2011 and the Khordad3 air defence battery which had shot down the RQ4. In addition to threats of retaliation and cyberattacks, the US upped the ante with still new sanctions on Iran and targeting a critical funding mechanism that Iran uses to finance its terrorists including the Qods force — its foreign operational arm. Tehran said US cumulative sanctions would block Iranian access to food and medicine and denied that the cyberattacks on September 14 had disrupted its oil flow.What are the lessons from the lethal strikes on Saudi oil facilities in 2019 that were forecast and war-gamed in 2012? That sanctions alone will not alter the Iranian regime’s behaviour. The failure of a kinetic response in May/June has emboldened the IRG to step up attacks. In case of US punitive strikes — once evidence is available that the source is Iran — Tehran will hit back at Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE and target US troops in Syria and Afghanistan. Clearly, the Saudi regime cannot defend itself despite a massive military budget of $68 billion (more than India’s) and the deployment of US Patriot3 and THAAD air defence systems. Ironically, Russia jumped in, offering its S400 ordered by Turkey, China and India.

On September 25, President Rouhani was unrepentant and defiant at the UN even as a US-led international group to protect navigation in the Gulf was revamped. Gen Joseph Dunford, Chief of Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said: “All options have been presented to Commander-in-Chief Trump,” adding that “it is a political judgement not for the military to decide.” Strategic choices are located between inaction and escalation. For Trump, in testing times, discretion seems to be the better part of valour.


BRO opens bailey bridge over Chotta Dara on Lahaul highway

BRO opens bailey bridge over Chotta Dara on Lahaul highway

Photo for representation only.

Tribune News Service

Mandi, October 29

The Border Roads Organisation (BRO) opened a 50-feet bailey bridge over the Chhota Dara nullah on the Gramfu-Kaza highway in Lahaul Spiti district today. It would provide better road connectivity to the people of the Spiti valley.

A long road stretch at Chhota Dara was in a bad condition for the past few years, posing problems for commuters coming to Manali from the Kaza side or travelling from Manali towards Kaza. The road is important strategically as also for tourism purpose.

Earlier, this road was under the Public Works Department, but its maintenance work was handed over to the BRO a few years ago. As it snows heavily in the area, the BRO gets little time for its maintenance and as a result the road remains in a bad condition at several places.

The people of the Spiti valley have been demanding maintenance of the road for better connectivity. BRO Commander Col Uma Shankar said, “The BRO has set up a 50-feet bailey bridge over the Chhota Dara nullah on the Gramfu-Kaza road. This nullah was creating a lot of trouble for tourists and locals but now the road has been restored. The bridge material was used from reserve stores of the BRO”.

Nullah created problems for commuters

The BRO has set up a 50-feet bailey bridge over the Chhota Dara nullah on the Gramfu-Kaza road. This nullah was creating a lot of trouble for tourists and locals but now the road has been restored. The bridge material was used from reserve stores of the BRO. Col Uma Shankar, BRO Commander

 


India, China coordinate on patrolling along LAC 

ew Delhi India and China are for the first time patrolling Fish-Tail II, one of the 13 disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-east Arunachal Pradesh, in coordination with each other in an attempt to build mutual confidence and maintain peace along the border, a senior official in the security establishment said on condition of anonymity.

Fish Tail-I and II are in the easternmost corner of Arunachal Pradesh. Fish Tail -I is largely glaciated terrain, and patrols from either side are few and far between.

The proposal for “coordinated patrolling” was made by India at a high-level meeting between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian army in June in the run-up to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram,Tamil Nadu, earlier this month.

The two sides met in Arunachal’s Kibuthu, one of the seven designated border personnel meeting points. The Indian side was led by the commander of theDinjang (Assam)-based 2 Mountain Division of the III Corps of the Indian Army, the senior official cited above said.

China agreed to the Indian proposal, leading to structured “coordinated patrolling” along Fish-Tail II, the first time that such an exercise has been undertaken by the two countries, the official said.

“One of the key takeaways of the 2018 Wuhan summit, which followed the 73-day-long standoff between the Chinese People’s Army and the Indian army at Doklam, was to give strategic guidance to both armies to reduce border tensions. The coordinated patrolling is a step in that direction,” a senior ministry of defence official said.

The standoff at Doklam, in the India-Bhutan-Tibet trijunction, began on June 16, 2017, when the PLA entered the area in a bid to alter the status quo in violation of Beijing’s existing understanding with both India and Bhutan. The issue was eventually resolved with the disengagement of border personnel on August 28 that year.

India had suggested “coordinated patrolling” of the border earlier too, but found no takers in Beijing.

“Coordinated patrolling would mean both sides would inform the other about their outgoing foot patrols, and the areas that the patrol is likely to go and the duration of the patrol,” a second senior official who did not want to be named said.

Patrols from either side go up the designated “claim-line” and mark their presence before returning. “Since the movements of the patrols are known in advance, there is no need for the other side to send a patrol,” a third senior official said.

Faceoffs tend to occur when patrols from either side come face to face. “When patrols come face to face, each have to challenge the other,” the third official said. Recently, Indian and Chinese troops came face to face on the disputed Pangong Tso Lake in Ladakh, leading to a scuffle, according to some reports, the defence ministry official said.

Fish-Tail -I &II are among the most remote areas along the LAC and India’s road infrastructure is extremely poor in this area. India, however, regularly sends patrols, some of which take up to a month to reach their destination. The PLA undertakes sporadic patrols in the region.

“Given the terrain, connectivity and security implications, it’s basically a low hanging fruit where coordinated patrolling can be done. And it may be a good idea and place to experiment with coordinated patrolling and used in other areas too,” the first senior official cited above said, explaining the move.

India and China have an unresolved border dispute that dates back to their 1962 war. Differences in perception over where the border lies have led to occasional tensions, with one side accusing the other of making incursions into its territory.Over the years — in 1993, 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2012 — the two counties have signed several agreements to reduce border tensions.

Separately, China has refused to stop construction in the Tibet valley along Upper Subansari district in Arunachal. The road through the Bisa area to the border doesn’t have the same security implications as the road through the Doklam plateau in Bhutan. The Border Roads Organisation (BRO), however, is about to complete a corresponding road from Tama Chung Chung (TCC) to Maja, opposite of Bisa, the third senior official said.

In response to a detailed questionnaire, the Indian army did not directly comment on “coordinated patrolling” of Fish Tail -II or on the road through Bisa to the LAC being constructed by the Chinese PLA.

But the Indian Army did underline that borders have not been “demarcated,” leading to “differing perceptions” of the border. It also said that despite the differing perception of the border, mechanisms had evolved over a period of time to ensure that “peace and tranquillity along LAC is maintained.”

Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda (retd), who handled several tricky India-China standoffs in the past, said, “If handled maturely and with respect for each other’s security concerns; it is a good concept. The arrangement holds the promise to negate incidences witnessed at the Pangong Tso Lake between the two armies.”

Sudhi Ranjan Sen

New Delhi India and China are for the first time patrolling Fish-Tail II, one of the 13 disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-east Arunachal Pradesh, in coordination with each other in an attempt to build mutual confidence and maintain peace along the border, a senior official in the security establishment said on condition of anonymity.

Fish Tail-I and II are in the easternmost corner of Arunachal Pradesh. Fish Tail -I is largely glaciated terrain, and patrols from either side are few and far between.

The proposal for “coordinated patrolling” was made by India at a high-level meeting between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian army in June in the run-up to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram,Tamil Nadu, earlier this month.

The two sides met in Arunachal’s Kibuthu, one of the seven designated border personnel meeting points. The Indian side was led by the commander of theDinjang (Assam)-based 2 Mountain Division of the III Corps of the Indian Army, the senior official cited above said.

China agreed to the Indian proposal, leading to structured “coordinated patrolling” along Fish-Tail II, the first time that such an exercise has been undertaken by the two countries, the official said.

“One of the key takeaways of the 2018 Wuhan summit, which followed the 73-day-long standoff between the Chinese People’s Army and the Indian army at Doklam, was to give strategic guidance to both armies to reduce border tensions. The coordinated patrolling is a step in that direction,” a senior ministry of defence official said.

The standoff at Doklam, in the India-Bhutan-Tibet trijunction, began on June 16, 2017, when the PLA entered the area in a bid to alter the status quo in violation of Beijing’s existing understanding with both India and Bhutan. The issue was eventually resolved with the disengagement of border personnel on August 28 that year.

India had suggested “coordinated patrolling” of the border earlier too, but found no takers in Beijing.

“Coordinated patrolling would mean both sides would inform the other about their outgoing foot patrols, and the areas that the patrol is likely to go and the duration of the patrol,” a second senior official who did not want to be named said.

Patrols from either side go up the designated “claim-line” and mark their presence before returning. “Since the movements of the patrols are known in advance, there is no need for the other side to send a patrol,” a third senior official said.

Faceoffs tend to occur when patrols from either side come face to face. “When patrols come face to face, each have to challenge the other,” the third official said. Recently, Indian and Chinese troops came face to face on the disputed Pangong Tso Lake in Ladakh, leading to a scuffle, according to some reports, the defence ministry official said.

Fish-Tail -I &II are among the most remote areas along the LAC and India’s road infrastructure is extremely poor in this area. India, however, regularly sends patrols, some of which take up to a month to reach their destination. The PLA undertakes sporadic patrols in the region.

“Given the terrain, connectivity and security implications, it’s basically a low hanging fruit where coordinated patrolling can be done. And it may be a good idea and place to experiment with coordinated patrolling and used in other areas too,” the first senior official cited above said, explaining the move.

India and China have an unresolved border dispute that dates back to their 1962 war. Differences in perception over where the border lies have led to occasional tensions, with one side accusing the other of making incursions into its territory.Over the years — in 1993, 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2012 — the two counties have signed several agreements to reduce border tensions.

Separately, China has refused to stop construction in the Tibet valley along Upper Subansari district in Arunachal. The road through the Bisa area to the border doesn’t have the same security implications as the road through the Doklam plateau in Bhutan. The Border Roads Organisation (BRO), however, is about to complete a corresponding road from Tama Chung Chung (TCC) to Maja, opposite of Bisa, the third senior official said.

In response to a detailed questionnaire, the Indian army did not directly comment on “coordinated patrolling” of Fish Tail -II or on the road through Bisa to the LAC being constructed by the Chinese PLA.

But the Indian Army did underline that borders have not been “demarcated,” leading to “differing perceptions” of the border. It also said that despite the differing perception of the border, mechanisms had evolved over a period of time to ensure that “peace and tranquillity along LAC is maintained.”

Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda (retd), who handled several tricky India-China standoffs in the past, said, “If handled maturely and with respect for each other’s security concerns; it is a good concept. The arrangement holds the promise to negate incidences witnessed at the Pangong Tso Lake between the two armies.”

Sudhi Ranjan Sen

New Delhi India and China are for the first time patrolling Fish-Tail II, one of the 13 disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-east Arunachal Pradesh, in coordination with each other in an attempt to build mutual confidence and maintain peace along the border, a senior official in the security establishment said on condition of anonymity.

Fish Tail-I and II are in the easternmost corner of Arunachal Pradesh. Fish Tail -I is largely glaciated terrain, and patrols from either side are few and far between.

The proposal for “coordinated patrolling” was made by India at a high-level meeting between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian army in June in the run-up to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram,Tamil Nadu, earlier this month.

The two sides met in Arunachal’s Kibuthu, one of the seven designated border personnel meeting points. The Indian side was led by the commander of theDinjang (Assam)-based 2 Mountain Division of the III Corps of the Indian Army, the senior official cited above said.

China agreed to the Indian proposal, leading to structured “coordinated patrolling” along Fish-Tail II, the first time that such an exercise has been undertaken by the two countries, the official said.

“One of the key takeaways of the 2018 Wuhan summit, which followed the 73-day-long standoff between the Chinese People’s Army and the Indian army at Doklam, was to give strategic guidance to both armies to reduce border tensions. The coordinated patrolling is a step in that direction,” a senior ministry of defence official said.

The standoff at Doklam, in the India-Bhutan-Tibet trijunction, began on June 16, 2017, when the PLA entered the area in a bid to alter the status quo in violation of Beijing’s existing understanding with both India and Bhutan. The issue was eventually resolved with the disengagement of border personnel on August 28 that year.

India had suggested “coordinated patrolling” of the border earlier too, but found no takers in Beijing.

“Coordinated patrolling would mean both sides would inform the other about their outgoing foot patrols, and the areas that the patrol is likely to go and the duration of the patrol,” a second senior official who did not want to be named said.

Patrols from either side go up the designated “claim-line” and mark their presence before returning. “Since the movements of the patrols are known in advance, there is no need for the other side to send a patrol,” a third senior official said.

Faceoffs tend to occur when patrols from either side come face to face. “When patrols come face to face, each have to challenge the other,” the third official said. Recently, Indian and Chinese troops came face to face on the disputed Pangong Tso Lake in Ladakh, leading to a scuffle, according to some reports, the defence ministry official said.

Fish-Tail -I &II are among the most remote areas along the LAC and India’s road infrastructure is extremely poor in this area. India, however, regularly sends patrols, some of which take up to a month to reach their destination. The PLA undertakes sporadic patrols in the region.

“Given the terrain, connectivity and security implications, it’s basically a low hanging fruit where coordinated patrolling can be done. And it may be a good idea and place to experiment with coordinated patrolling and used in other areas too,” the first senior official cited above said, explaining the move.

India and China have an unresolved border dispute that dates back to their 1962 war. Differences in perception over where the border lies have led to occasional tensions, with one side accusing the other of making incursions into its territory.Over the years — in 1993, 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2012 — the two counties have signed several agreements to reduce border tensions.

Separately, China has refused to stop construction in the Tibet valley along Upper Subansari district in Arunachal. The road through the Bisa area to the border doesn’t have the same security implications as the road through the Doklam plateau in Bhutan. The Border Roads Organisation (BRO), however, is about to complete a corresponding road from Tama Chung Chung (TCC) to Maja, opposite of Bisa, the third senior official said.

In response to a detailed questionnaire, the Indian army did not directly comment on “coordinated patrolling” of Fish Tail -II or on the road through Bisa to the LAC being constructed by the Chinese PLA.

But the Indian Army did underline that borders have not been “demarcated,” leading to “differing perceptions” of the border. It also said that despite the differing perception of the border, mechanisms had evolved over a period of time to ensure that “peace and tranquillity along LAC is maintained.”

Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda (retd), who handled several tricky India-China standoffs in the past, said, “If handled maturely and with respect for each other’s security concerns; it is a good concept. The arrangement holds the promise to negate incidences witnessed at the Pangong Tso Lake between the two armies.”

Sudhi Ranjan Sen

New Delhi India and China are for the first time patrolling Fish-Tail II, one of the 13 disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-east Arunachal Pradesh, in coordination with each other in an attempt to build mutual confidence and maintain peace along the border, a senior official in the security establishment said on condition of anonymity.

Fish Tail-I and II are in the easternmost corner of Arunachal Pradesh. Fish Tail -I is largely glaciated terrain, and patrols from either side are few and far between.

The proposal for “coordinated patrolling” was made by India at a high-level meeting between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian army in June in the run-up to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram,Tamil Nadu, earlier this month.

The two sides met in Arunachal’s Kibuthu, one of the seven designated border personnel meeting points. The Indian side was led by the commander of theDinjang (Assam)-based 2 Mountain Division of the III Corps of the Indian Army, the senior official cited above said.

China agreed to the Indian proposal, leading to structured “coordinated patrolling” along Fish-Tail II, the first time that such an exercise has been undertaken by the two countries, the official said.

“One of the key takeaways of the 2018 Wuhan summit, which followed the 73-day-long standoff between the Chinese People’s Army and the Indian army at Doklam, was to give strategic guidance to both armies to reduce border tensions. The coordinated patrolling is a step in that direction,” a senior ministry of defence official said.

The standoff at Doklam, in the India-Bhutan-Tibet trijunction, began on June 16, 2017, when the PLA entered the area in a bid to alter the status quo in violation of Beijing’s existing understanding with both India and Bhutan. The issue was eventually resolved with the disengagement of border personnel on August 28 that year.

India had suggested “coordinated patrolling” of the border earlier too, but found no takers in Beijing.

“Coordinated patrolling would mean both sides would inform the other about their outgoing foot patrols, and the areas that the patrol is likely to go and the duration of the patrol,” a second senior official who did not want to be named said.

Patrols from either side go up the designated “claim-line” and mark their presence before returning. “Since the movements of the patrols are known in advance, there is no need for the other side to send a patrol,” a third senior official said.

Faceoffs tend to occur when patrols from either side come face to face. “When patrols come face to face, each have to challenge the other,” the third official said. Recently, Indian and Chinese troops came face to face on the disputed Pangong Tso Lake in Ladakh, leading to a scuffle, according to some reports, the defence ministry official said.

Fish-Tail -I &II are among the most remote areas along the LAC and India’s road infrastructure is extremely poor in this area. India, however, regularly sends patrols, some of which take up to a month to reach their destination. The PLA undertakes sporadic patrols in the region.

“Given the terrain, connectivity and security implications, it’s basically a low hanging fruit where coordinated patrolling can be done. And it may be a good idea and place to experiment with coordinated patrolling and used in other areas too,” the first senior official cited above said, explaining the move.

India and China have an unresolved border dispute that dates back to their 1962 war. Differences in perception over where the border lies have led to occasional tensions, with one side accusing the other of making incursions into its territory.Over the years — in 1993, 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2012 — the two counties have signed several agreements to reduce border tensions.

Separately, China has refused to stop construction in the Tibet valley along Upper Subansari district in Arunachal. The road through the Bisa area to the border doesn’t have the same security implications as the road through the Doklam plateau in Bhutan. The Border Roads Organisation (BRO), however, is about to complete a corresponding road from Tama Chung Chung (TCC) to Maja, opposite of Bisa, the third senior official said.

In response to a detailed questionnaire, the Indian army did not directly comment on “coordinated patrolling” of Fish Tail -II or on the road through Bisa to the LAC being constructed by the Chinese PLA.

But the Indian Army did underline that borders have not been “demarcated,” leading to “differing perceptions” of the border. It also said that despite the differing perception of the border, mechanisms had evolved over a period of time to ensure that “peace and tranquillity along LAC is maintained.”

Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda (retd), who handled several tricky India-China standoffs in the past, said, “If handled maturely and with respect for each other’s security concerns; it is a good concept. The arrangement holds the promise to negate incidences witnessed at the Pangong Tso Lake between the two armies.”

 Sudhi Ranjan Sen

letters@hindustantimes.com

New Delhi : India and China are for the first time patrolling Fish-Tail II, one of the 13 disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-east Arunachal Pradesh, in coordination with each other in an attempt to build mutual confidence and maintain peace along the border, a senior official in the security establishment said on condition of anonymity.

Fish Tail-I and II are in the easternmost corner of Arunachal Pradesh. Fish Tail -I is largely glaciated terrain, and patrols from either side are few and far between.

The proposal for “coordinated patrolling” was made by India at a high-level meeting between the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Indian army in June in the run-up to the informal summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Mamallapuram,Tamil Nadu, earlier this month.

The two sides met in Arunachal’s Kibuthu, one of the seven designated border personnel meeting points. The Indian side was led by the commander of theDinjang (Assam)-based 2 Mountain Division of the III Corps of the Indian Army, the senior official cited above said.

China agreed to the Indian proposal, leading to structured “coordinated patrolling” along Fish-Tail II, the first time that such an exercise has been undertaken by the two countries, the official said.

“One of the key takeaways of the 2018 Wuhan summit, which followed the 73-day-long standoff between the Chinese People’s Army and the Indian army at Doklam, was to give strategic guidance to both armies to reduce border tensions. The coordinated patrolling is a step in that direction,” a senior ministry of defence official said.

The standoff at Doklam, in the India-Bhutan-Tibet trijunction, began on June 16, 2017, when the PLA entered the area in a bid to alter the status quo in violation of Beijing’s existing understanding with both India and Bhutan.

The issue was eventually resolved with the disengagement of border personnel on August 28 that year.

India had suggested “coordinated patrolling” of the border earlier too, but found no takers in Beijing. HTC


Veterans update yourself on ECHS

Dear Veteran brothers Please update yourself….!!
1. Fixed Medical Allowance @ Rs.100 was introduced w.e.f. 01.12.1997.
2.Fixed Medical Allowance @ Rs.1000 was increased w.e.f. 01.07.2017.
3. ECHS members not eligible for Medical Allowance.
4. ECHS facility is now extended to the dependents of ex-recruits boarded out are drawing Disability pension.
5. ECHS made compulsory for those discharged after 01.04.2003.
6. There is no fee for pre 1.1.96 pensioners to join this scheme.
7. From 1.1.96 to 31.3.2003 they have to pay to join this scheme.
8. From 29.12.2017 the rates have been increased. (From Recruit to Hav rank Rs. 30,000, From Nb.Sub. to Hon.Capt and Equivalents. Rs.67000 & for all Officers Rs.1,20,000)
9. If you are having 32 KB individual white card, you can use up to Dec 2020.
10. If you are having Temporary ECHS slip, you have to apply for NEW Card.
11. If you have lost your ECHS card, you have to apply on line for new card.
12. If you are a member of ECHS make sure that you are not paid Fixed Medical Allowance.  If you are paid, wirte a letter to the bank to stop it, otherwise your ECHS Card will be suspended.
13. War disabled pensioners & widows are exempted from paying ECHS contribution.
14. If you are having old 16Kb (Red colour combined card), you have to change it before Sep 2018.
15. Keep note of your PPO No and always give your particulars like Rank, Group, Qualifying Service and date of birth in case of any query.
16. Always keep your pension account jointly with your Spouse. (E or S or F or S basis)
17. All family pensioners must give nomination to their pension accounts.
18.Update your pass book entries regularly.
19. Collect Pension slip from bank every month and keep it safe.
20. Link your Aadhaar Number and PAN number with your Pension account.
21. Name of your spouse in the PPO and in the Bank account must be same.
22. If your and your spouse date of birth is not with your Bank, please submit your school certificate, Aadhaar card, PAN Card, Voter ID to the Bank for recording your Date of Birth.
23. Do not forget to give Life Certificate to the Bank in November every year.
24. All Pre 1.4.1985 pensioners must make sure that their Spouse name is there for family pension.  If not, apply for endorsement of family pension immediately through ZSB to your Records office.
25. All pre 1.4.1985 pensioners, who do not have pension book or PPO copy, please apply to bank and get a copy
26. If a pensioner dies before the age of 67,his spouse should get the same pension as her husband.  From the date of death till the deceased attains age of 67 or for 7 Years whichever falls early.
27. The pensioners who completed 80 years of age are eligible to get 20% increase in their basic pension as additional pension.  If you are not getting, you have to apply to the bank with the proof of date of birth.
28. EPF Pension in addition to Defence Pension Family pension allowed w.e.f. 27.07.2001
29. ESM can draw two pensions separately without any ceiling w.e.f. 01.01.1996.
30. DR. for re-employed ex-servicemen with some conditions w.e.f. 18.07.1997.
31. DR. is admissible to employed family pensioners without any condition w.e.f. 18.07.1997.
32. Minimum Ordinary Family Pension as per 7th CPC  is Rs.9,000+ DR  w.e.f. 01.01.2016.
33. Minimum Special Family Pension as per 7th CPC is Rs. 17,990 w.e.f. 01.01.2016.
34. Compensation for Delayed payment of Pension/Arrears to be paid w.e.f. 01.10.2008.
35. Improvement in pension for ORs & JCOs as per CDA Circular 430 w.e.f. 01.07.2009.
36. Additional pension is payable after 80 years on both the pensions, if any one drawing two pensions.
37. Additional pension is applicable for WIP/Disability Pension/Lib.FP & SFP.
38. Joint notification of family pension was introduced from 01.03.1985.  Those who do not have    joint notification for family pension, they have to apply immediately.
39. Dual family pension is payable from 24.9.2012. as per CDA Cir.504 dt.17.01.2013.  The families of ESM who were drawing two pensions and died before 24.9.2012 were denied dual family pension at that time.  As per CDA Cir.504, they are eligible for two family pensions.
40. W.E.F. 01.07.2009 the concept of Broad banding of percentage of disability/War injury Shall be extended to Armed Forces Pensioners who were invalided out of service prior to 01.01.1996 and are in receipt of disability/war injury pension as on 01.07.2009.
41.Broadbanding for all pensioners is applicable wef 01.01.2016(Circular 596)
42. The Cap on maximum WIP i.e. not to exceed emoluments last drawn has been removed w,e,f, 01.07.2009.
43. Liberalised family pension came into existence from 01.02.1972.
44. If you are having disabled children, unmarried daughters, widowed daughters, you must apply for Part II order (POR) for pension benefits on later dates.
45. Always check your pension with your Rank, Group, Qualifying service and date of birth.
46. Apply for financial assistance for disabled children from  KSB if you are not getting from anywhere.
47. If you have lost your ESM ID Card, you have to apply for duplicate from Zilla Sainik Board.
48.Your full date of birth must be recorded in your Aadhaar Card.  Your mobile number also to be linked to your Aadhaar card.  Visit Aadhaar permanent enrolment centre for any change.Nowadays banks are also entrusted to be Aadhaar enrolment centre.
49. ADLR Scheme Funeral Grant Rs.10,000 w.e.f. 08/07/2016. Paid by Canteen.
50.Zilla Sainik Board pays Rs.5000 funeral grant.
51. Dignified Last Rites grant from Army/Navy/Airforce HQs amount differs.
Note:- There are many more to know shall keep updating.
KNOW YOUR DUES AND RIGHTS

Defence Ministry to decide on Army’s Rs 10,000 crore Akash missiles proposal for Pakistan, China border

The proposal to acquire two regiments of the Akash Prime missiles which can be deployed in high altitude areas to counter China and Pakistan would be discussed at the meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council scheduled to be held today.

Defence Ministry to decide on Army's Rs 10,000 crore Akash missiles proposal for Pakistan, China border

NEW DELHI: Seeking to prevent any intrusion of aircraft through the mountainous borders with Pakistan and China, the Defence Ministry is set to discuss a proposal to acquire two regiments of the Akash Prime missiles which can be deployed in high altitude areas above 15,000 feet.

The new Akash missiles which will have an extended performance range than its predecessors are being prepared to be deployed in high altitude areas in Ladakh which shares boundaries with both Pakistan and China. ..
Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/71685060.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst


ndian Navy to conduct exercise in Arabian Sea

Indian Navy to conduct exercise in Arabian Sea

For representation only. File photo

Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, October 20

The Western Naval Command of the Indian Navy has started a fortnight long exercise in the Arabian Sea.

“With the withdrawal of the monsoon and improved sea conditions, this is the right time to test our operational preparedness, validate procedures and try out new strategies and concepts of naval operations,” a naval spokesperson said.

The exercise will include live firing drills, helicopter operations from ships, operational logistics, and communication standard operating procedures are some of the areas that will form the core of these planned exercises in order to hone operational skills, testing of training efficacy and validate existing seamanship practices and procedures.

The Indian Navy has been a key presence in the Arabian Sea following its prolonged anti-piracy deployments in the Gulf of Aden and Op Sankalp off the Gulf of Oman.

The Western Naval Command just concluded an offshore security and contingency exercise code named “Prasthan” on October 17.

It may also be recalled that the Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had embarked the Western Fleet in end-September and the Navy had used the opportunity to exercise carrier-based evolutions and fighter operations during the event.


Gear up for tech warfare, service Chiefs tell DRDO

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, October 15

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval along with Chiefs of three services on Tuesday asked the Defence Research and Development Organisation to be ready for future wars entailing different technology and suggested what conflict could mean some years down the line.

The NSA and the three Chiefs along with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh were at the DRDO ‘Directors Conference’ here. “The two-day conference that began today will debate multiple issues,” said DRDO Chairman Dr G Sateesh Reddy as the country’s top defence scientists heard out what the forces wanted.

The conference will be deliberating the way forward and the future needs. It will see industry collaboration, service requirements and how the academia will pitch in.

“Start preparing for a non-contact war… If you don’t think now, it will be too late,” said Army Chief General Bipin Rawat, asking the DRDO to focus on cyber, space, laser, robotics and artificial intelligence.

Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria, Air Force Chief, suggested, “In five years, no one will talk about stealth. The radar development is such that it will pick up even ‘low radar cross section’ (military parlance for picking up stealth features). We will need data fusion, superb radars and ability to quickly launch missiles.”

The IAF Chief, who has been a test pilot for light combat aircraft Tejas was effusive in praise. “The LCA helped technology grow, it’s the best we have. The fly by wire and composites that are now 40 percentage of the structures will help in future,” he said.

Navy Chief Admiral Karambir Singh made specific suggestions. He said the goal of getting local products to replace imported ones was best left to industry and the DRDO could focus on state-of-the-art weapons. “See, how an organisation like the DARPA of the US became a reality,” he said. The DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is responsible for development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

For his part, the Defence Minister heaped praise on former President and DRDO ex-Chairman Dr APJ Abdul Kalam on the occasion of his birth anniversary. He unveiled a bust of Dr Kalam at the main entrance of the DRDO. “We have to be operationally ready and reduce dependence on imports,” said the minister.

 


Chased, Gen’s grandson hits PCR vehicle, arrested

Chased, Gen’s grandson hits PCR vehicle, arrested

Had ‘stolen’ Rs 40,000 from home

  • Sources said before the incident, suspect Kanav Hoon’s kin had called up the Panchkula police to inform that he had stolen Rs 40,000 from the house and driven away following which a message was flashed by the police. The matter is being probed at the Sector 7 police post, Panchkula.
The Hyundai Venue, which was being driven by the suspect.

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, October 9

A 32-year-old motorist, grandson of Lt Gen PN Hoon (retd), a former GOC-in-C of the Western Command, who was allegedly driving under the influence of liquor, has been arrested by the UT police after he reportedly hit a PCR vehicle twice when he was signalled to stop the vehicle, a Hyundai Venue. The vehicle was involved in an accident in Panchukla and UT cops were intercepting the offending vehicle when the incident took place on October 7.

According to the police, Head Constable Sada Shivtripathi was on PCR duty when information was received from the Police Control Room that a vehicle that was involved in an accident in Panchkula was spotted near the Transport light point.

The PCR vehicle which was near the spot chased the vehicle and signalled the driver to stop the vehicle near the Railway light point. However, he hit the PCR vehicle with his car and sped away from the spot.

The PCR staff kept chasing the suspect and tried to stop the vehicle near the Bapu Dham light point. However, the suspect again rammed his car into the PCR vehicle. The police said his car broke down and he failed to escape from the spot.

The police rounded up the driver, Kanav Partap Hoon, a resident of Sector 6, Panchkula.

A case under Sections 279 (rash driving), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from the discharge of his duty) and 186 (obstructing a public servant in the discharge of public functions) of the IPC and Section 185 (driving by a drunken person or a person under the influence of drugs) of the Motor Vehicles Act has been registered at the Industrial Area police station. The suspect has been arrested and the vehicle impounded by the police.

 


Dassault Aviation releases photos of IAF Rafale RB 002

Dassault Aviation releases photos of IAF Rafale RB 002

Rafale RB 001 formally joined the Indian Air Force (IAF) on October 8, 2019, and the second combat aircraft from Dassault Aviation with tail number 002 is getting ready. Dassault released photos of Rafale RB 002 in flight on Wednesday, just a day after handing over the first of the 36 fighters to the IAF in the presence of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in Bordeaux city’s Merignac.

A series of five photos released by Dassault Aviation shows the twin-seater Rafale RB 002 flying over the sea, forested area and open fields. IAF will get eight twin-seater Rafale trainers while the remaining 28 aircraft are single-seaters.

IAF Rafale RB 002

The day on which the first Rafale joined the IAF was also the 87th Air Force and Vijayadashmi, a festival which celebrates the triumph of good over evil.

IAF Rafale RB 002 jet

RB on the Rafale tail stands for the current Chief of Air Staff Rakesh Kumar Singh Bhadauria who was a key figure in clinching the deal for the 4++ Generation fighter during his tenure as the IAF deputy chief.Rafales joining the IAF have been modified with several India-specifics intruments to make them more potent and lethal. IAF is also getting MBDA’s deadly Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air and Scalp subsonic cruise missiles along with the Rafales.

IAF Rafale RB 002 fighter jet

IAF will arm two squadrons with the Rafale combat aircraft. While 17 Squadron Golden Arrows with 18 Rafales will be based at Ambala in Haryana to tackle threats from Pakistan, with the remaining 18 jets will arm 101 Squadron Falcons and be stationed at West Bengal’s Hasimara Air Force Station to take care of any Chinese misadventure.

IAF Rafale RB 002 combat aircraft

A team of IAF pilots, engineers and technicians are undergoing training on Rafale jets in France and the first aircraft will land in India in May 2020. IAF will receive 18 Rafales by February 2021 while the 36th aircraft will reach the country by April-May 2022.


Army veterans’ rally in Akhnoor

Our Correspondent

Jammu, October 6

A mega rally of Army veterans was organised by the Crossed Swords Division at Tanda, Akhnoor, on Sunday which draw a huge response.

It gave an opportunity to veterans to solve their pension anomalies, health-related issues and grievances. To make the endeavour meaningful, a holistic approach was adopted wherein more than 3,000 ex-servicemen, widows, ‘veer naris’ and their kin belonging to Akhnoor were felicitated with mobility aids and utility items. The General Officer Commanding, Crossed Swords Division, said no incentive could ever compensate the sacrifice of soldiers and their kin, who had served the motherland. He also reassured the beneficiaries that the Army would always be honoured to look after the well-being of its veterans and their families.