http://

Washington, December 21

The US acceded to Pakistan’s demand to overlook its secretive nuclear weapons programme following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the late 1970s after Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping convinced Washington to support Islamabad for the “stability” in South Asia, according to latest declassified State Department documents.

The documents reveal that the then Pakistani dictator Gen Zia-ul Haq and Chinese Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping were successful in extracting this price from the US in lieu of Islamabad’s support to America against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

Deng also convinced the US to start giving more military and financial aid to Pakistan, according to the US Foreign Relations 1977-1980 volume on Afghanistan.

The voluminous document indicates that both Zia and Deng successfully convinced the then Jimmy Carter administration that India under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi would be pro-Soviet.

“There are limits on our ability to aid Pakistan because of their nuclear explosive programme. Although we still object to their doing so, we will now set that aside for the time being, to facilitate strengthening Pakistan against potential Soviet action,” the then US Defence Secretary Harold Brown said in a January 8, 1980, meeting with Deng.

“Pakistan has its own arguments, i.e., India has exploded a nuclear device but the world has not seemed to complain about this. So now you have decided to put this aside and solve the question of military and economic aid to Pakistan. We applaud this decision,” said Deng, who later emerged as China’s top leader.

He also convinced the US to not equate India and Pakistan when it comes to giving aid. “Regarding India, we have always felt that the United States should try to cultivate good relations, and this has had a good effect. But India is not a stabilising factor. Perhaps you already know the general election results,” he said. He was referring to the then just-concluded parliamentary elections in which Indira Gandhi came back to power with a majority. Observing that Gandhi had got 70 per cent of the vote, Deng said it was very difficult to judge how India will go. — PTI

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, December 16

Vijay Diwas was observed at the headquarters of the Western Command, Chandimandir, to commemorate the victory of the Indian armed forces in the 1971 War against Pakistan, which led to the liberation of Bangladesh.

Over 93,000 Pakistani troops had surrendered before the Indian Army and were taken prisoners of war.

A solemn ceremony was organised at the Veer Smriti war memorial in Chandimandir to pay homage to the martyrs who had made a supreme sacrifice during the war.

A wreath was laid at the memorial by Lt Gen Surinder Singh, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, on behalf of all ranks.

A large number of serving as well as retired officers attended the ceremony at Chandimandir.

On the occasion, the Army Commander exhorted all ranks to rededicate themselves to the service of the nation and be always ready to take to battle on a short notice and be prepared to make any sacrifice.

He said that the Western Command was ever ready not only to defend the nation from its adversaries but also to support the state governments in north India to maintain internal peace, provide humanitarian assistance in case of any disaster and assist military veterans and their families.

Rajmeet Singh
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, December 14

A resolution by Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh, thanking the Centre and Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan for the Kartarpur corridor initiative, saw him being advised by the members of Opposition, to not to see the project through the “prism of terrorism”.

While the Chief Minister missed out the name of Navjot Sidhu in the initiative, a Congress MLA praised the Cabinet Minister while at the same time endorsed concerns of the Chief Minister on Pakistan’s bid to revive terrorism.

The Opposition MLAs, including Sukhbir Badal, advised the Chief Minister to be positive and work for the corridor to come through. AAP MLA Kanwar Sandhu said Capt was relying on selective memory while forgetting about the peace initiatives that he had taken when he was the Chief Minister during his previous term.

Sukhbir Badal suggested resolution on swapping land of Kartarpur gurdwara with Pakistan. Minister Sukhjinder Randhawa endorsed the suggestion of Badal.

Amarinder, while appreciating the role of the Narendra Modi government and the initiative by Pakistani premier Imran Khan in paving way for opening of the corridor, warned the Opposition and countrymen to be wary of Pakistan’s designs to revive militancy in Punjab.

He said he would visit Pakistan once peace prevailed between the two countries. He advised Imran Khan to tame his Army in case he wanted peace to prevail.

He did not mention Navjot Sidhu’s name for the efforts put by him in the corridor issue.

Akali MLA Gurpartap Wadala, while speaking on the corridor issue, urged the Chief Minister to be positive on the issue. He appreciated the role of Navjot Sidhu.

In reply, the Chief Minister said while every Sikh was happy on opening of the corridor, politics and evil designs of the Pakistan army should be understood.

In reply, the Chief Minister said while every Sikh were happy on opening of the corridor, politics and evil designs of the Pakistan Army should be understood.

Kartarpur: Reckless throw of the dice

The centenary of World War I has reignited literary and academic interest in the contribution of Indian soldiers

Forgotten heroes: The sacrifices of Indian soldiers in WWI were largely ignored in the writings and books on the subject

Sqn Ldr Rana TS Chhina (retd)

World War I (1914-1918) was undoubtedly one of the defining events of modern world history. The conflict set in motion a chain of events with far reaching consequences. While it is now a century since ‘the guns of August’ finally fell silent, the repercussions of that cataclysmic churning are felt around the world till this day.

In India, the war was initially seen as a means to prove India’s loyalty to imperial Britain. Mainstream political opinion in the country was whole-heartedly in support of the war effort with an intensity that took even the colonial administrators by surprise. The prevalent feeling, summed up by Mahatma Gandhi, was that if India wished to obtain greater political responsibility, it must offer its unconditional support to Britain in her hour of need. The ensuing Indian contribution to the war, both in terms of men and material, far exceeded both expectations and capability. However, the stresses and strains imposed by the wartime economy merely exacerbated the cracks that had already begun to appear in the edifice of imperial solidarity. By the time the war ended, Britain’s relationship with India had changed irrevocably. The contiguous social and political effects only hastened the process that would lead to the end of the British Raj less than three decades later in August 1947.

The Punjab disturbances of 1919 had altered the very meaning of memory in the Indian context of the Great War and in the period after Independence, the war was largely forgotten in India and Pakistan. The sacrifice of India’s soldiers was consigned to the dustbin of history in the post-colonial world. The Indian Army that had served with honour and distinction in France and Flanders, East Africa, Gallipoli, Aden, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Palestine, Transcaspia, Persia, and even China, was itself divided between the newly independent states of India and Pakistan. Although both these armies retained an institutional memory of the war in their battle honour days and regimental histories, the new States viewed it as a colonial conflict of little or no relevance to their history.

However, the centenary of the outbreak of the World War I gave global impetus to numerous commemorative activities, research, and public discourse that have all contributed significantly towards our understanding of the conflict and its legacies.

The centenary also generated wider interest in the role played by India in the conflict and gave fresh momentum to commemoration in India and abroad. Within India, the United Service Institution of India (USI) took the lead and spearheaded ‘India and the Great War’ centenary commemoration project with support of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), who supported it as a public diplomacy initiative. The project used the centenary commemoration as a medium to examine the involvement of India and its Army in the war effort as well as the political, social and economic effects of the war on India. It undertook and supported a number of commemorative activities, academic research and community engagement projects, all of which have combined to influence the manner in which the war, with its colonial roots and postcolonial legacies, is viewed and understood within India.

Similar commemorative projects were initiated by Indian diaspora communities in the UK, Europe, Australia, and Canada. Many of these projects overlapped, or formed part of, the framework of national commemorative activities of the diaspora’s host countries. The response and rationale for diaspora commemoration was varied, from adopting a uni-dimensional white-washed and sanitised narrative aimed solely at inclusion, to viewing commemoration within the matrix of institutional and individual racism, both contemporary and historical.

The ‘India and the Great War’ centenary commemoration project engaged with a wide spectrum of partners, from governments down to individuals, including descendants of veterans of the Great War both in India and Pakistan. For many, it was the first time in living memory that the contribution of their forebears was being recognised or remembered.

One of the longer lasting legacies of the centenary commemoration is the number of publications now available that shed new light on various aspects of India’s involvement with the Great War.

Apart from the literary and academic interest that it generated, the centenary also gave a fillip to remembrance. The USI’s ‘India Remembers’ project mooted the proposal to have the marigold as a uniquely Indian flower of remembrance. The Government of India, through the USI, has also built a national memorial in France. This memorial, located at Villers-Guislain, near the site of Lance-Dafadar Gobind Singh’s death-defying ride in December 1917, is distinct from the Indian Memorial at Neuve Chapple. It was inaugurated by the Vice-President of India on November 10, 2018, and is the second Indian national memorial overseas, the other being at the Menin Gate in Belgium.

The writer is a Secretary and editor, centre for armed forces historical research

Bookshelf

Honour and Fidelity: India’s Military Contribution to the Great War 1914-18, Amarinder Singh, Roli Books, 2014

Sowars and Sepoys in the Great War 1914-1918, Cavalry and Infantry Regiments of the Indian Army; Ashok Nath; Nathfoundations, Sweden, 2014,

The Indian Empire At War: From Jihad to Victory, The Untold Story of the Indian Army in the First World War, George ;Little, Brown Book Group; 2018

Sepoys in the Trenches: The Indian Corps on the Western Front 1914-15; Gordon Corrigan; The History Press; Reissue edition, 2015

The Great War: Indian Writings on the First World War; Rakhshanda Jalil; Bloomsbury India, 2018.

Les Hindous – The Indian Army on the Western Front ; Rana Chhina; USI CAFHR: 2016

India, Empire, and First World War Culture: Writings, Images, and Songs; Santanu Das; Cambridge University Press, 2018

Indian Troops in Europe: 1914-1918; Santanu Das; Mapin, 2017

The Indian Corps on the Western Front: A Handbook and Battlefield Guide; Tom Donovan and Simon Doherty; Tom Donovan Editions, 2014.

Sources in the IAF’s eastern air command based in Shillong told DH that seven ALGs at Tuting, Mechuka, Along, Wallong, Ziro, Tawang and Pasighat have been upgraded and are ready for use for military purposes while work at another ALG in Vijaynagar wa…

Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/national/refurbished-algs-boost-iaf-706161.html

t is the “strength” of public support that is the power behind every bullet the soldier fires. Loose talk, catering to a limited audience, can ultimately prove enfeebling. Can the nation afford that?

Defence and diplomacy are often said to be opposite sides of the same coin: with the uniforms adding that they are often tasked with clearing up the mess created by incompetent foreign offices. Yet it has been a sterling feature of India’s democracy that unlike what obtains across its western border, a healthy distinction has been maintained between those two facets of governance.

Until now at least. General Bipin Rawat, not for the first time, has turned established norms on their head by contending that Pakistan and India could never enjoy a cordial relationship until Islamabad revokes its status as an Islamic state. There has never been a dearth of Pakistan-bashers in the country (the Navjot Singh Sidhu’s and Mani Shankar Aiyar’s are maverick exceptions) but not even the most Nagpur-oriented of them has never gone as far as the Chief of Staff of an Army that took immense pride in its secular, apolitical credentials.

Not that Pakistan is the only Islamic nation on the planet, are they all to be slammed as pariahs? Does India not have excellent ties many with of them, are remittances from Gulf-based NRIs not a critical component of India’s foreign-exchange reserves? Gen Rawat could undermine the several successes of the MEA in general, Mrs Sushma Swaraj in particular. Not to mention under-cutting the essays of Gen VK Singh. And in a larger context, are Hindu and Muslim intrinsically incompatible?

The “simple soldier” alibi will just not work: Rawat could not have been unaware of the developments over Kartarpur, who authorised him to “take on” Imran Khan? Worse, he stepped out of line at a function at which the focus was on young, impressionable, military cadets.

Was this not a case of nurturing an equivalent of the Hate-India campaign for which we consistently condemn Pakistan? What if other countries cite cow vigilantes running amuck, desecration of churches etc to question India’s secular status? Lambasting Pakistan for its sponsorship of terrorism in J&K is one thing, questioning that nation’s religious status is something else.

And if Sushma Swaraj is unable to ensure that the General refrains from exceeding his brief the MEA risks international embarrassment. Do his “brother generals” endorse his politically-loaded line? The efficiency of a military force is established by its showing in the field, even if the politicians seek to capitalise on surgical strikes etc.

The apex court’s latest order/observations on the Army’s use of excessive force in Manipur, and its rejection of the government’s argument serve as a stark reminder that in public perception the image of the Army is losing its aura. And it is the “strength” of public support that is the power behind every bullet the soldier fires. Loose talk, catering to a limited audience can ultimately prove enfeebling. Can the nation afford that? Nirmala Sitharaman has to answer the query.

he indigenously designed BrahMos missile is a tested and proven supersonic cruise missile and will form the primary weapon on-board these ships, said the official.

New Delhi, December 1

The Defence Ministry on Saturday approved military procurement worth Rs 3,000 crore, including BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles for Navy’s two stealth frigates and armoured recovery vehicles for the Army’s Arjun main battle tanks, a senior official said.

The go-ahead for both acquisitions was given by the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), the ministry’s highest decision-making body on procurement, the senior military official said.

“The DAC chaired by Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman accorded approval for acquisition of defence equipment worth about Rs 3,000 crore,” he said.

India is procuring two stealth frigates at a cost of USD 1 billion and both the ships will be equipped with indigenously developed BrahMos missiles.

“The indigenously designed BrahMos missile is a tested and proven supersonic cruise missile and will form the primary weapon on-board these ships,” said the official.

The DAC also approved the procurement of Armoured Recovery Vehicles (ARVs) for the Indian Army’s main battle tank, Arjun. The ARVs are designed and developed by the DRDO and would be manufactured by defence public sector undertaking BEML, the official said. PTI

Raj Kadyan

I stood on top of the bowling run; the fifth ball of the over. Many thoughts came crowding in rapid flashback. The wife was berating me: ‘What good are you? You could not earn in 40 years what these youngsters earn in 40 seconds? And they are the adulated heroes of the country.’ I countered that we had our own real heroes. She retorted sarcastically: ‘You will again talk of Piru Singh, Abdul Hameed, Sekhon and others who won the highest gallantry medals. And Ashok Chakra Umed Mahra of your own battalion, who died fighting insurgents.’

During her pause for breath, I underscored the point that these were the people who ensured that we as a country lived in peace and safety. Her retort was swift: ‘And who knows them in the country? Remember how our six-year-old granddaughter cried when she saw her favourite cricketer arrested on TV?’

I knew I was on feeble footing but I did not give up. ‘When she grows up, she will learn.’ She went on: ‘Go to any school or college, name your war heroes and see the blank faces.’

I was fumbling for words when she asked: ‘Didn’t you read about the son of Albert Ekka, the 1971 Param Vir Chakra awardee, pulling a rickshaw to eke out a living?’ And then driving the final nail of irony she asked: ‘And who brought even this to light; a journalist from Bangladesh?’

I had lost my speech.

Transferring the ball to my right, I bent forward in a stretch motion to signal that I was honouring the agreement. Wiping my brow from left to right was my way of telling the batsman that I would be balling to the right. He repositioned himself accordingly, exposing the stumps; though in rival teams we had rehearsed all this minutely. The fielding captain moved a player away from where he could have taken a catch in case the ball lofted. All this while the umpire had held up his extended arm signalling me to wait and thus allow time for bets to be placed. His packet, like everyone else’s, would be delivered before the next sunset. The whole thing was working like a well-oiled machine. I felt a kind of thrilling triumph that we could fool millions who watched. Though there was always that small lurking apprehension, if not fear, that the authorities may come calling; curse the modern technology in tracking every blessed thing.

I started on my 16-step run. I could picture every eye glued to my action. Thick wads of greenbacks fleetingly flashed before my eyes.

When halfway I heard the dreaded knock. My heart stopped as I froze in midair, almost levitating. A shake came next. ‘Wake up,’ the wife said. As I opened my eyes I hazily saw the maid standing with the tea tray. ‘Are you ok?’ the wife asked with genuine concern. After all, it is not healthy for a septuagenarian to wake up drenched in sweat.