Sanjha Morcha

Army mulls hybrid vehicles for high-altitude areas

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, October 30

After decades of sustained deployment in some of the highest operational areas in the world, the Army is now exploring the feasibility of developing hybrid vehicles for use in high altitude areas to overcome the problems of degraded performance and high attrition that combustion engines face due to extreme cold and rarified air.

Army Design Bureau (ADB), the nodal agency dealing with the project, has flagged the issue for urgent redressal by the industry or research institutes as there is effective means to mitigate the problem as yet. ADB is the repository of all technical know-how for the Army and is the interface between government and private establishments for design, development and innovations.

At present, special grade fuel and oil is being used in high altitude areas, but these are not very effective during peak winters from November to March, often leading to vehicles becoming off-road.

Many areas where the Army is deployed — Ladakh, Kargil, Lahaul and Spiti, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh — experience sub-zero temperatures for several months in a year.

The engine horse power of conventional vehicles drops considerably in high altitude areas due to lack of air density and pressure. Further, due to extreme low temperature fuel and oil freeze or their viscosity increase, thereby affecting flow through the engine hoses or blocking injectors and filters increasing the risk of seizure, according to an Army engineer. Lubrication of engines and other moving parts is also affected, leading to frequent change of parts.

Hybrid vehicles with dual power source can overcome such problems as electric drive achieves greater efficiency in stop and go mission profiles as compared to conventional engines. The regenerative braking resources stores power as electrical energy resulting in greater fuel efficiency and an electric motor can generate instantaneous power for better off road maneuvering, engineers said.

Hybrid vehicles are a relatively new concept in India that is available in some passenger cars, but it is restricted to start and stop functions rather than drive power. The US Army is also said to be developing hybrid vehicles.


Ladakh’s long wait for more

Ladakh’s long wait for more

Think long term: Setting up a Divisional Commissioner’s office will go a long way in meeting the regional aspirations of the people of Ladakh.

P Stobdan
Former Ambassador 

Protecting Ladakh against prolonged troubles in Kashmir was long overdue and so was the imperative of addressing some of the aspirations of the people there. Ladakh holds 60 per cent of J&K’s territory and plays critical role for national security that can’t be overlooked. Also inconceivable has been how Independent India (at the behest of Nehru) reduced Ladakh’s profile of being one of the five kingdoms in the Himalayas into a mere neglected district of the Valley.

Joseph Korbel, father of former US Secretary of State Madelaine Albright, wrote in 1950 that Kashmiri leadership was playing a trick on the people of Ladakh, if not frightening them to surrender under their control. For seven decades, New Delhi has turned a blind eye to Kashmiri sabre-rattling and the trickery upon the people of Ladakh — perhaps even worse than Pakistanis’ exploitation of the people in Gilgit & Baltistan. In the late 1970s, Sheikh Abdullah drove a wedge between Kargil Shia versus Leh Buddhist, besides creating a nefarious ‘Greater Kashmir’ concept to obliterate Ladakh.

The myth of J&K as a unitary state (a heritage of Dogra fiefdom) has outlived its historical inviolability. India should have thought about doing away with any subjugation links that Ladakh notionally had with J&K. After persistent articulation for the status of a UT, the Union government finally agreed in 1993, as interim measure, to create the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council. In 1995, the Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs announced the Act enacted by the President under the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Legislature (Delegation of Powers) Act, 1992, to provide for the establishment of Autonomous Hill Development Councils and an Inter-District Advisory Council in the Ladakh region. 

The Act had to be passed during the phase of the third and longest Governor’s Rule (1990-1996). But the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council (LAHDC) Act in 1997, passed by the NC government, was toothless. It was in 2002, during the time of the PDP-led coalition government in J&K, that a semblance of power was devolved to LAHDC of Leh district through an amendment to the 1997 Act.

It was remarkable that then CM, Mufti Sayeed, within two months of his coming to power, decided to delegate greater financial and administrative powers to LAHDC (Leh) and create a similar LAHDC for Kargil as well. Under the new Act, the LAHDC chief executive councillor was given the status and perks of a Cabinet minister and executive councillors of a deputy minister’s rank. The council was empowered to decide on the allotment and distribution of land, superintendence and control over the council employees. 

The LAHDCs of Leh and Kargil have been functioning well, rather in an exemplary way since. But in a major decision on September 27, the State Administrative Council (SAC) — equivalent of a Cabinet in Governor’s rule, under the chairmanship of Governor Satya Pal Malik, has approved yet another LAHDC (Amendment) Bill, 2018, to fully empower the councils with greater administrative and financial powers. Inter alia, the amendments gave more powers to the LAHDC to levy and collect taxes, more administrative control over the staff and more allocation and flow of funds from Centrally-sponsored schemes.

While the people of Ladakh had been seeking a separate legislative arrangement in the form of a UT status since 1951, which the ruling BJP agreed to fulfil prior to 2014, constitutional changes seem unattainable. Since the matter is perceived as linked with the Kashmir issue, it can’t be realised for now. Regions like Ladakh, which are in favour of deeper integration with the national mainstream, cannot be allowed to drift against the current context of destabilising forces in the state.

The Centre also cannot punish the region any longer on the ground of its demographic deficiency (low weight in electoral politics). Considering Ladakh’s geo-strategic significance and in the light of Pakistan recently promulgating the Gilgit Baltistan Order 2018 (entrusting it with an assembly with legislative power) a change in Ladakh is critical. New Delhi has to be mindful of China blustering its way through the region under its CPEC projects which will have direct consequences for Ladakh.

While UT status would remain a long-drawn process, strategic articulation and national security imperative should propel the government to upgrade the administrative status of Ladakh at least to a divisional level. Currently, only a DC-level officer in Leh and Kargil acts as the chief executive officer of the respective council, who, in turn, reports to the Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir and Ladakh based in Srinagar. The Commissioner sitting in Kashmir supervises and controls 12 districts, including Leh and Kargil, in terms of administrative, developmental and law and order situation.

Separating Ladakh from Kashmir Division and setting up a Divisional Commissioner’s office will go a long way in meeting the regional aspirations of the people. The launch of the overarching national vision of a tunnel through Zoji La (11,578 ft), connecting the Valley with Ladakh, in addition to building a high-elevation all-weather Bilaspur-Manali-Leh rail axis and Srinagar-Kargil-Leh axis will go a long way in removing Ladakh’s isolation. The projects are of great strategic, economic and developmental significance. The biggest spin-off will be the region opening up to better influx for tourism.

 


Centre submits in SC details of Rafale deal decision-making process

Centre submits in SC details of Rafale deal decision-making process

File photo of the Rafale fighter jet. AFP

New Delhi, October 27

The Centre has filed in the Supreme Court details of the decision-making process for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets in a fly-away condition from France’s Dassault Aviation.

The details of the decision-making process were submitted to the Secretary General of the Supreme Court on Friday in a sealed cover as directed by it on October 10 while hearing a PIL by advocate ML Sharma.

The Supreme Court had on October 10 asked the government to disclose details of the decision-making process for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets.

Directing that the information would be furnished in a sealed cover and reach the court by October 29, the court had said that it was not issuing notice to the respondents.

The court had sought information from the government as Attorney General KK Venugopal said the purchase of the French fighter aircraft concerned the national security and described the petition as a “political interest litigation” which had been filed when the government and opposition were locked in a severe political fight.

Addressing the court, PIL petitioner advocate ML Sharma had referred to the pricing of the aircraft that had been quoted at different points of time before different forums to drive home the point that price being paid by India was high.

He had taken the court through the history of deal initially starting in 2008, involvement of a corporate house before finally the deal for purchase of 36 Rafale aircraft in a fit-to-fly condition was signed. IANS

 


First biofuel-­blended IAF plane to take flight soon

biofuel,bio-aviation combination,IAF

On November 19, a Russian made AN-32 of the Indian Air Force’s transport fleet will take to the skies from a base in the Western Sector using a mix of Aviation Turbine Fuel and Bio-Fuel. This would be the first ever IAF aircraft to use the fuel mix.

After transporters, the helicopter fleet will fly using Bio-Aviation combination. “It will be a gradual move, and ultimately fighters like the Su-30MKi, and Mig-29 will also be flying using Bio-Aviation Fuel, “ said a senior IAF officer who didn’t want to named.

On an average, IAF flies over 100 transporter and over 500 helicopter sorties in a day. “Using Bio-jet blended fuel is a commitment towards lowering the oil import bill and lower the carbon footprint and strengthen the farm-based economy,” Wing Commander Anupam Banerjee, the IAF spokesperson said.

Two years ago, the IAF sent Wing Commander Asheesh Srivastava to study the use of Bio Aviation Fuel at the Centre for Air Power Studies (CAPS). Subsequently, the Indian Institute Petroleum and the Centre for Military Airworthiness & Certification and the Directorate General of Aeronautical Quality Assurance were roped in.

“If we do this well we may never need to import crude oil for our armed forces. This bio-jet product looks, smells and performs exactly like Aviation Turbine Fuel. If we are able to work this out as we anticipate, our aircraft, vehicles and warship can all bank on domestic reserves of indigenously developed and produced renewable fuel,” Dr Anjan Ray Director of the CSIR -Indian Institute of Petroleum said.

Every year, the IAF pays about Rs 40,000 crores for Aviation Turbine Fuel. With Bio-Aviation Fuel, the IAF expects its fuel bill to drop by about 10 per cent. “Initially, the plan is to use a 90-10 mix (90 litres of AFT mixed with 10 litres of Bio-fuel), gradually, as the supply and production of Bio-Fuel increases the plan is to move to a 75 -25 mixture,” a senior official involved with the process who didn’t want to be named said.

To ensure that production of Bio-Fuel doesn’t affect the land available for food-grains, Bio-Fuel will be produced only from non-edible oils that grow well in arid lands. Gujarat, for instance, offered 10,000 acres arid land to produce non-edible oilseeds. Other states that are keen to produce non-edible oil seeds and put up plants to produce Bio- Fuel include Punjab, Haryana, Chattisgarh, Uttrakhand and Telagana.

If the test flight that starts from November mid-week goes as planned, IAF will show-case its capability during the Republic Day fly past on January 26, 2019, a senior IAF official said.

First Published: Oct 17, 2018 10:26 IST

 


For changes in Army, a study of past vital by Lt-Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd

innovative change is the acme of military effectiveness. However, much depends on the circumstances dictating such change and the process adopted.

 

 

For changes in Army, a study of past vital

Changes on anvil: The Indian Army has not lagged in innovation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lt-Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd)

Lt-Gen Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd)

From the reportage about the most recent conference of the Army Commanders, the Indian Army appears hell bent on organisational changes, ostensibly to save Rs 7,500 crore every year and have more money for its capital budget for modernisation. What these changes will be and what effect they will have on the operational capabilities and war-fighting doctrines is an issue that is very comprehensive and can spark a debate. A review of the historical process of change undergone by the Indian Army both at the tactical and operational levels while comparing this with our adversary, Pakistan, can set the tone.The Indian and Pakistan armies have, over the past 70 years, undertaken reviews, like any other army of the world, by continuously studying each other, available technology, concepts and doctrines of other armies, the operational terrain and environment of the times with constraints such as budgeting and resource availability, to optimise their effect in battle. In the Indian context, the two-front threat (China and Pakistan) has been a major consideration; the Pakistan army does claim a second threat on its western front, which in comparison, is marginal. An analysis of some major changes adopted by the two countries over the years is essential for an understanding of the matter.

Pakistan army’s innovations

An immediate recall about the Pakistan army: there are two issues that used to strike us quite starkly many years ago. Very early, Pakistan raised the Recce & Support (R&S) units for the role of tank destruction using anti-tank weapons. These light units reinforced the capability of engaging with a much stronger armoured component of the Indian Army, as a cheaper but very effective option. These units also had heavy infantry automatic weapon detachments to reinforce weaker segments of the holding force in areas under engagement. It afforded much higher flexibility in battle. To overcome its size disadvantage, the Pakistan army decided to enhance firepower at the cost of manpower; it innovatively equipped its basic infantry sub-unit (the section) with two automatics as compared to our one. The Indian Army finally raised R&S units only commencing in 1983 and similarly reinforced our basic sub-units with a second automatic around this time; a good three decades later.

It hardly needs much memory to recall that in 1965, we were surprised by Pakistan’s 6 Armoured Division (a second armoured division), the existence of which was not known to the Indian General Staff. It is after 1971 that we raised a second armoured division and then a third (initially a mechanised division). Among other marked innovations of the Pakistan army was the raising of the artillery division to provide concentrated fire support and flexibility in the mechanised battlefield. We subsequently raised three such divisions. Pakistan also adopted the concept of Air Defence (AD) Command for greater centralisation and control of AD resources all over its territory and defence of its nuclear strategic assets, in the face of a superior Indian Air Force. India has not felt the necessity of such an organisation. Pakistan was the first to include Army Aviation as an essential arm of the Army. It had the advantage of facing no resistance from the Pakistan air force.  Eventually, the Indian Army’s aviation arm did emerge.

One of the most innovative responses in reorganisation within the existing resources was the Pakistan army’s raising of the Centralised Corps Reserve (CCR) for its two desert and semi-desert corps when the threat of the third Indian strike corps emerged in 1990. One may recall the conversion of the HQ Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) of Operation Pawan to a Corps HQ and organised with offensive resources to take the battle across the Rajasthan desert. Unnerved by this, Pakistan quickly put together resources to raise the CCRs by incorporating the returning formations from Saudi Arabia with existing reserves. Gradually, as more resources were raised, these have become two full-fledged mechanised divisions.

Indian Army’s innovations

It is good to give the adversary more than his due just as it’s been done above. However, the Indian Army has not lagged in innovation, although admittedly at the tactical level it was forced to respond to many innovations of the Pakistan army.

At the operational and strategic levels, three innovations mark the Indian Army’s successful adaptation to the changing environment. The 1975 Experts Committee, comprising Lt-Gen Krishna Rao and Maj-Gen K Sundarji (later both Chiefs), recommended a series of measures in reorganisation at operational level of war fighting.

The major lesson here is that none of these were immediately adopted. They underwent a serious doctrinal testing in simulated conditions, wargames and exercises with troops before adoption.

1 Among the most famous was the conversion of many of the divisions of the Strike and Pivot Corps of the plains to the now famous acronym — RAPID (Reorganised Army Plains Infantry Division), giving them a better mechanised capability for manoeuvre in offensive and defensive operations.

The second innovation is the Rashtriya Rifles, 63 units of which today battle terrorists in J&K and manage the counter-terrorist environment. Raised in 1991, this specialised force with a permanent presence in the operational environment, with troops being rotated, has freed up regular units for conventional role; today it optimises for that role. It is one of the finest experiments in Indian military innovation.

3 The third innovation was an almost 180-degree change in concept: the adoption of proactive strategy after Operation Parakaram (the mobilisation effort post the December 13, 2001 terror attack on Parliament). It led to the battle group concept (BG), gave much more teeth to the Pivot Corps to initiate early operations without awaiting the much larger Strike Corps and thereby defeat Pakistan’s much quicker mobilisation effected due to the far shorter distances of its cantonments from the border. Both sides have relocated formations on the basis of this change. Pakistan today unsuccessfully attempts to stymie our thinking through the threats of employing tactical nuclear weapons.

Innovative change is the acme of military effectiveness. But much depends on the circumstances dictating such change and the process adopted. Nothing done in a hurry pays dividend and doctrinal testing, at least through simulated wargaming, and a season or two of exercises with troops contributes to the stability of change

 


Darshani Deori at Golden temple to get new doors today Replicas of original ones, seashells used for ivory effect

Darshani Deori at Golden temple to get new doors today

Baba Sukhwinder Singh Bhurewale inspecting the new Darshani Deori doors to be fitted at Golden Temple in Amritsar on Friday. Vishal kumar

GS Paul
Tribune News Service

Amritsar, October 5
The Darshani Deori, the archway leading to the Golden Temple sanctum sanctorum, will get new doors, a replica of the ones installed by Sikh ruler Maharaja Ranjit Singh about 200 years ago. The doors — 118 inches in height, 110 inches wide and with a thickness of 4 inches — will be installed at a ceremony on Saturday that will be attended by SGPC president Gobind Singh Longowal and his colleagues.

The original doors — a sandalwood base with a silver sheet studded with carved ivory attached with golden screws — were unhooked for repairs for the first time in 2010 after these were found to have decayed with time. On July 4, 2010, the mammoth task of restoring their glory was allotted to Kar Sewa Baba Kashmir Singh Bhurewale. Meanwhile, temporary doors were installed as a stop-gap arrangement.

The restoration work was to be completed within a year but was delayed owing to several hiccups, SGPC chief secretary Dr Roop Singh told The Tribune. For one, the wooden base was found to be beyond repair. Another hindrance was non-availability of ivory that was to be engraved on the doors’ borders. As the sale of ivory is banned, the SGPC decided to leave the original doors ‘untouched’ and create replicas with the help of seashells to create the desired effect. On February 15, 2018, it again allotted the work to Baba Bhurewale.

Craftsmen from Agra were specially engaged for carvings on black sheesham. “Every detail was captured through micro-digital photography that helped study the pattern minutely,” explained Baba Sukhwinder Singh Bhurewale. “Barring ivory work (which is replaced with seashells), the new doors are an error-free copy. The craftsmen from Agra took eight months to complete the job, using six quintals of sheesham and 65 kg of silver,” he added.  The original doors will be placed in a glass case at the Golden Temple ‘parkarma’.


Original doors were installed in 1800 AD

  • The original doors carved by Yaar Mohammed Khan were installed by Maharaja Ranjit Singh in 1800 AD
  • These were presented to him by a Sikh family of Sursingh village
14
SHARES

Terror charges against Purohit, Pragya

Terror charges against Purohit, Pragya

Sadhvi Pragya

Shiv Kumar

Tribune News Service

Mumbai, October 30

A special court on Tuesday framed charges in the 2008 Malegaon blast case against former Military Intelligence officer Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and five others for terror activities, criminal conspiracy and murder, among others.Judge Vinod Padalkar, presiding over the special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, said the Abhinav Bharat organisation with which the accused were associated was formed with the objective of carrying out terror attacks. He said a bomb containing RDX was planted on a motorcycle that left six dead and 101 injured.

All the accused have been charged under various sections of the IPC, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and the Indian Explosives Substance Act. Appearing before the court, the accused said they did not plead guilty.Sadhvi Pragya said the NIA had first given her a clean chit but later framed charges against her. “I am not a member of Abhinav Bharat. I have said in the past also that I am in no way connected with this organisation. This is a kanoon ka khel happening here,” she said, adding that the terror allegations were being levelled against her at the behest of the Congress.

Lt Col Purohit’s lawyers pleaded for deferment of framing of charges as they were set to appeal in the apex court against Bombay High Court’s order refusing to stay the framing of charges.


Appoint senior-most officer as Army medical chief: SC Sets aside lateral posting of Air Force officer

Appoint senior-most officer as Army medical chief: SC

Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, October 29

Setting aside the lateral shifting of an Air Marshal to the post of Director General Medical Services (Army), the Supreme Court on Monday directed that the senior-most officer in line, Lt Gen Manomoy Ganguly, be appointed to the said post.

On August 10, the government posted Air Marshal Rajvir Singh then DGMS (Air Force) as the DGMS (Army) in the rank of Lieutenant General. Medical officers are rotated amongst the three services and don the uniform and ranks of the service they are posted to.

This was challenged by Lt Gen Ganguly, recently promoted from the rank of Major General after a court battle, on grounds of seniority and merit. The issue of the appointment of DGMS (Army) has seen several rounds of litigation in the Armed Forces Tribunal and the apex court that had also resulted in the appointment of another Lieutenant General being quashed earlier.

“We are of the opinion that the process undertaken by the respondents in taking decision to appoint Air Marshal Rajvir Singh as DGMS (Army) does not stand judicial scrutiny. We are constrained to set aside the appointment,” a Bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan ruled.

Pointing out that the first fundamental error occurred in lateral shifting of Air Marshal Rajvir and considering his candidature along with others, the Bench said it was contrary to guidelines that permitted lateral shifting only in exceptional circumstances, which did not exist in the instant case.

Remarking that it failed to understand why the methodology of Overall Average Performance (OAP) was thought of by the Army Chief to adjudge comparative merit of officers in the fray when, concededly ACR grading has never been used as a criteria for posting of a Lieutenant General officer earlier, the Bench said the OAP mechanism was foreign to the Army’s selection guidelines.

The case

  • On August 10, the government had posted Air Marshal Rajvir Singh, then DGMS (Air Force), as the DGMS (Army) in the rank of Lieutenant General
  • This was challenged by Lt Gen Manomoy Ganguly, recently promoted from the rank of Major General after a court battle, on grounds of seniority and merit.

Money gifted to Ambani, none for OROP: Rahul

New Delhi, October 27

Congress president Rahul Gandhi today met a delegation of ex-servicemen and promised them to implement One Rank, One Pension (OROP) if his party was elected to power. He attacked the PM for “giving a gift of Rs 30,000 crore to inexperienced Anil Ambani in the Rafale deal, but not giving Rs 8,300 crore that would be enough to implement the OROP”.

“All ex-servicemen said the BJP government has not implemented the OROP. They also spoke about the situation in J&K, the non-strategic approach of the government, the divisions created there and the cost being paid by our soldiers. They also discussed Rafale. And these are connected,” Rahul said. — TNS