Sanjha Morcha

ommando’s gallant act saved his squad Killed two militants single-handedly before laying down his life in Tangdhar

Commando's gallant act saved his squad

The Army pays tributes to slain Lance Naik Sandeep Singh at the Badami Bagh Cantonment in Srinagar on Tuesday. Tribune photo

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, September 25

Para commando Sandeep Singh lived and died for the country. The 30-year-old Lance Naik displayed exemplary bravery when he killed two infiltrators single-handedly before laying down his life on the Line of Control in the dense Tangdhar forests in Kupwara district.At least five militants suspected to be foreigners were killed during the three-day-long counter-infiltration operation that began on Saturday at Tangdhar.

Army sources said Lance Naik Sandeep Singh of Special Forces led a search party which launched the operation in the Gagadhri Nar area of Tangdhar on September 22 after an input about infiltration was received. The combing was jointly carried out by the 4 Para commandos and 20 Jat Regiment.“On noticing suspicious movement, Sandeep deployed his squad and moved further to ascertain the presence of militants. He encountered two terrorists at close quarters and a fierce gunfight ensued in which he neutralised both militants. During this daredevil act, he sustained a gunshot wound in his head and succumbed to his injuries as he was being evacuated,” the sources said.

An officer privy to the operation details said the commando ensured the safety of his own squad of the Special Forces. “With utter disregard for his personal safety and upon noticing that his squad was in danger, the commando eliminated two hardcore foreign militants, ensuring the safety of his four-member squad and the subsequent elimination of all three terrorists,” he said.

Lance Naik Sandeep Singh, a resident of the Kotla Khurd area of Gurdaspur in Punjab, is survived by his wife. He had joined the Army in 2007.

Meanwhile, the Army on Tuesday paid a befitting tribute to the commando in a solemn ceremony at Badami Bagh Cantonment. Chinar Corps Commander Lt Gen AK Bhatt and all ranks paid homage to the slain commando on behalf of a proud nation.


Rs 1 crore, govt job for martyr’s family: Kejriwal Promises to amend ex-gratia policy to include those settled in Delhi after joining defence services

Our Correspondent

Sonepat, September 21

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Naveen Jaihind, state Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) president, on Friday met the family members of martyr Narender Singh of the BSF at his native village, Thana Kalan, in the district.

Head Constable Narender was brutally murdered by Pakistan Rangers near the Indo-Pak border in Samba sector recently.

The Delhi CM announced that his government would provide financial assistance of Rs1 crore to the bereaved family and a member of the family would be inducted in government service.

“As Narender’s family has been residing at Shikarpur in Delhi, the state government would amend the rules to make provision for giving them these benefits,” he said.

He said, “Why does the Centre appear so helpless? Why is the Prime Minister so silent? Why is he not replying in kind to Narender’s brutal murder?”

Jaihind chided Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar for neglecting the bereaved family. “The Haryana CM should leave ‘Rahgiri’ and take care of the people of the state,” he remarked.

Later, Haryana Women and Child Development Minister Kavita Jain met the bereaved family. She announced a financial grant of Rs50 lakh from the state government to the martyr’s family and asked SDM Kharkhoda Sweta Suhag to ensure that the cheque gets delivered at the earliest. She also assured a government job to a family member.


Encounter between security forces and militants on Jammu-Srinagar highway

Encounter between security forces and militants on Jammu-Srinagar highway

Gunshots were heard in th area. File photo

Amir Tantray

Tribune News Service

Jammu, September 12

There was an encounter between security forces and militants in Jajhar Kotli area in Jammu district on the Jammu-Srinagar highway on Wednesday.unshots were heard in th area.

The Jammu SSP said militants were intercepted and they fired on the security forces


IAF crew flies to France for Rafale training

NEW DELHI: A six-member Indian Air Force crew is on its way to France to train on Rafale fighter planes, amid politics over the controversial ~ 59,000-crore deal showing no signs of dying down in the country, two persons familiar with the matter said.

A fighter pilot, an engineer and four technicians form the first batch of a hand-picked crew who will train on the Rafale jets as the IAF prepares the ground for inducting the first lot of its new planes from September 2019. The crew, which left for France on Sunday, will be trained at the Saint-Dizier air base in eastern France.

“The IAF will send more pilots and technicians to France for Rafale training in the coming months in batches. It will be the responsibility of these crews to fly the jets to India,” said one of the officials cited above. The Rafale will be the first imported fighter jet to be inducted into the IAF in 22 years after the Russian Sukhoi-30 fighters. The first Su-30 entered IAF service in June 1997.

India and France signed the deal for two Rafale squadrons (36 planes) in September 2016 as an emergency purchase to arrest the worrying slide in the IAF’s capabilities. The squadrons will be based at Ambala in Haryana and Hasimara in West Bengal, covering the northern and eastern fronts.

All 36 fighter planes will arrive by September 2022, a small step on the long road towards building a stronger air force. The count of the IAF’s fighter squadrons has reduced to 31 compared to an optimum strength of 42-plus units required to fight a two-front war with China and Pakistan.

The Rafale jets are tailored for the IAF: India-specific enhancements include helmet-mounted sight, radar warning receivers, flight data recorders with enough storage for 10 hours of data, infra-red search and track systems, jammers, cold engine start capability to operate from high-altitude bases and towed decoys to lure incoming missiles away. The fighters will be equipped with Meteor beyond visual range missiles built by European defence major MBDA Missile Systems. The Meteor’s no escape zone is touted to be three times greater than that of current medium range air-to-air missiles.

While the UPA has alleged that India paid ~351 crore more for each jet than other Rafale customers, the NDA government has asserted that the basic aircraft price is 20% cheaper under the NDA than what was on offer under the UPA in 2007.

The IAF has defended the deal saying the Rafale brings tremendous capabilities at a reasonable price. The government has said the prices are not comparable because of several factors: the fighter numbers, the time since the previous negotiations; the fact that the previous deal was not viable and couldn’t have been closed; and the weaponisation and customization of the warplanes.

The NDA has also said that it cannot disclose the price on two counts: a confidentiality agreement with France, and the strategic reason of not showing its hand to India’s enemies. The opposition has claimed the confidentiality agreement doesn’t apply to this deal.


Brig MS Dullat involved in a serious money laundering case worth ₹371 crore .

CBI files case against bank officials for fraud

The CBI has found Brig MS Dullat involved in a serious money laundering case worth ₹371 crore . He was summoned in the court on 6 Sept, He did not inform DSOI about this. The governing body of DSOI must terminate his membership as per bye rules of DSOI. He is defecto VC of DSOI. It’s shameful to have such dubious characters as members of elite Army clubs.

The Central Bureau of Investigation has registered a case against three then Assistant Managers of the Indian Overseas Bank and others, including a retired Brigadier, for allegedly causing a loss of Rs. 321 crore to the exchequer.

According to the CBI, Brigadier M.S. Dullat (retired), Dinesh Kumar, the then proprietor of Vision Procon, Amanpreet Singh Sodhi of Heights International, Aman and Gaurav Kirpal of Sai Bhakti Impex Pvt. Ltd and Hong Kong-based Colour Wave (HK) Ltd. have been made accused, apart from unknown public servants.

“The accused, in connivance with the branch officials, siphoned off bank funds under the garb of Letters of Comfort in favour of the Hong Kong-based company purportedly issued by officials of the Indian Overseas Bank, Chandigarh, to the Punjab National Bank, Dubai, and the Bank of Baroda, Bahamas,” said CBI spokesperson R.K. Gaur.

 


Contrasting fate of two warriors by Lt Gen Bhopinder Singh

Sadly at a time when the US was eulogising its warrior-statesman Senator John McCain, there was no respect shown towards India’s legendary saint-soldier, LT Gen Hanut Singh, whose premises were sealed in Dehradun

The ‘profession of arms’ bestows a certain nobility, morality and sovereign responsibility that are unmatched in its emotional import to the nation state. The selfless nature of its professional calling often necessitates the combatants to honour their sworn commitments to the Constitution by paying the ‘ultimate price’.

In mature democracies, where the armed forces serve under the civilian authority, their wilful adherence to the highest ethical standards, discipline and steel elevates their popular perception amongst the citizenry. This is especially true in lands of wounded civilisations, bloody history and ongoing combat commitments (like the Armed Forces of the United States or India).

Within the comity of such forces, this culture is sustained by celebrating examples of its heroic past, individual gallantry and the saga of unimpeachable leadership. Beyond the ultimate victory or defeat of battles, it is raw courage and valour of the combatants that are revered for posterity. Hence, a Vietnam is no less sacred as an Iwo Jima, or in the Indian context, a 1962 as a 1971.

Recently, two war heroes from these lands met with starkly contrasting fate. The United States witnessed unprecedented scenes of national mourning, unfiltered grief and the dignity of a spontaneous outpouring, following the death of its Vietnam war hero and Senator, John McCain, whose memory cuts across societal and political divisions in the fractured nation.

The thoroughbred soldier and son of an Admiral, Naval Aviator John McCain was shot down while flying over Hanoi and was a Prisoner of War (PoW) who was tortured in custody for over five years. His physical disabilities, owing to his military services, never diminished the soldier’s instincts as he blazed his way into a political career that was marked by his trademark uprightness, blunt individuality and loyalty to his nation.

In an amazing show of bipartisanship and grace, former Presidents and one-time McCain-rivals, George W Bush (who defeated McCain in Republican primaries) and Barack Obama (who defeated McCain in the Presidential run-off) heaped eulogies on the statesman-warrior and patriot that befitted the soldier to his nation.

His daughter’s loaded ode to the real hero, “We gather here to mourn the passing of American greatness. The real thing, not cheap rhetoric from men who will never come near the sacrifice he gave so willingly, nor the opportunistic appropriation of those who live lives of comfort and privilege while he suffered and served”, or as Barack Obama movingly noted that despite their differences, “we never doubted we were on the same team”.

The America that John McCain had stood up for resolutely and dignifiedly was one where he slammed his own partyman Donald Trump from taking potshots at a fallen soldier, Captain Humayun Khan, about whom McCain said, “memory of his sacrifice will make us a better nation — and he will never be forgotten”.

Soldiers have institutionalised memories and they do not waver from their scriptures or beliefs, the most supreme among them being defending their country above all.

Sadly, around the same time, a reverse narrative was under way in India when the nation forgot its own iconic and almost mythic ‘saint-soldier’, Lt Gen Hanut Singh, as his abode in Dehradun was sealed by an ignorant, apathetic and insensitive municipal corporation.

The legendary Maha Vir Chakra (MVC) awardee, who assumed folklore while in service itself, had passed away in his ashram in Dehradun in 2015. Unsurprisingly, it was in the ‘abode of gods and soldiers’ that this ascetic and spiritually-inclined soldier spent his last years. The veteran community has been aghast and protested to what they saw as an affront to the memory of the man who served the nation and its military, in the finest traditions as a dashing cavalier, feted hero and an unforgettable General.

The legend, who commanded the famous Poona Horse (only regiment to have won two Param Vir Chakras) in the decisive battle of Basantar in 1971, had his regiment acknowledged by none other than the Pakistanis as ‘Fakhr-e-Hind’ (Pride of India) for his battle daredevilry.

Much later, as a senior officer, his imprint and professionalism as a ‘soldier’s-general’, brilliant tactician and the greatest field commander were burnished — something that the equally legendary ‘Thinking General’ K Sundarji acknowledged by entrusting Lt Gen Hanut Singh with the command of 2 Corps. This contributed to mechanised doctrines in the evolution of Armoured Corps and Mechanised Infantry that stand the test of time.

It is said soldiers do not die but only fade away. However, Lt Gen Hanut Singh’s unique character, rectitude and uncompromising probity elevated him within the pantheons of Indian military history.

A fellow clansmen of Lt Gen Hanut Singh from the Marwar region of Rajasthan, Major Shaitan Singh had fought ‘to the end’ in a fierce display of unparalleled courage, leadership and exemplary patriotism in the Battle of Rezang La in 1962.

In a quirk of fate, Major Shaitan Singh (Param Vir Chakra) was from the Kumaon Regiment and goes down in the glorious soldering traditions of Uttarakhand as a proud ‘Kumaoni Officer’. It is this reciprocal dignity, appropriations and soldiering ethos that were invoked by the titular head of the famed Marwar Rathores, Gaj Singh, in his plea to the Chief Minister of Uttarakhand to respect the memory and protect the abode of Lt Gen Hanut Singh in Dehradun.

Chief Minister Harish Rawat would be personally conversant with the sensitivities involved in the matters of military, as like most others in Uttarakhand, he too belongs to a military family.

However, in India, political tides and commercial compulsions often combine to regress the sacrosanct into forgotten commitments. Much has been politically invoked in the name of the ‘Indian soldier’, yet it is these insensitivities that raise questions about the real intent, extent and respect for the uniformed fraternity.

As Abraham Lincoln famously said, “A nation that does not honour its heroes will not long endure”, holds true in all ‘lands of the free’, be it the US or India.

(The writer, a military veteran, is a former Lt Governor of Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Puducherry)


French Media Raises Questions Over Rafale-Reliance Partnership

The Rafale deal inked between the Indian and French governments has been frequently making headlines in the home turf with the Congress-led Opposition hurling accusations of corruption against the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government. Now critical views of the secretive deal are propping up in the French media as well.

Recently, France 24 – a State-owned TV network in France that caters to international audience – published a scrutinising piece titled “French Rafale jets deal sparks political storm in India” on the partnership between the makers of Rafale, Dassault, and Anil Ambani’s Reliance Group as a part of the offset clause of investing 50 percent of the 8.7 billion dollars in the Indian defence system.

The State-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was expected to be the natural partner considering its 78 years’ worth experience. Instead Ambani’s Reliance Group which had launched a new defence company called Reliance Defence only 13 days prior to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s announcement of the new Rafale deal, landed the partnership with the government’s approval, the France 24 report observed.

Describing the relationship between Anil Ambani – the younger of the Ambani brothers – the article said:

While the 59-year-old billionaire businessman has had little success in the telecom sector and no experience in the aviation industry, he does have a special affinity for India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister.

The piece described Ambani’s relationship with Modi to be “disconcerting” at times.

“The admiration, at times, has reached disconcerting levels, such as a 2016 “birthday message” by Ambani to Modi, which hailed the Indian prime minister as a “leader of leaders” and “king of kings” who “dreams with his eyes open,” the piece said.

It also characterised Modi’s reign since 2014 to be stained with allegations of “crony capitalism” with the BJP taking private donations to political parties to “new levels”.

The article also weighed in the opinions and accusations of reputed advocates, journalists and former BJP members regarding the “falsehood” and the secrecy of the deal.

Comparing the Rafale deal to the Bofors scandal which ultimately led to the defeat of the Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress government in 1989, the article said that history “may just repeat itself in the upcoming 2019 election”, as the Opposition hopes for, “except this time, with the tables turned”.

(The Quint is now on WhatsApp. To receive handpicked stories on topics you care about, subscribe to our WhatsApp services. Just go to TheQuint.com/WhatsApp and hit the Subscribe button.)


WHY WERE THE INDO­PAK TALKS CALLED OFF?

There’s no doubt India-Pakistan relations are accident-prone and when they go into a tailspin, they usually raise disturbing questions rather than provide meaningful answers. Yet, even by these standards, what happened last week defies belief. The government has a lot of explaining to do. But will it? Or will we be left befuddled?

To begin with, why at this time did the government agree to a meeting in New York between the Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers? The announcement came two days after the brutal killing of a BSF jawan, who was found with his throat slit. It also followed the announcement that September 29 would be observed as Surgical Strike Day. And let’s not forget the steadily worsening cycle of violence in Kashmir, for which Pakistan-supported terrorist groups are responsible. So was this the right moment to schedule a meeting of foreign ministers?

Second, the claim that this was just a meeting but not a dialogue is hairsplitting. Undoubtedly, the two ministers would have discussed terror, and that includes the situation in Kashmir. The MEA also confirmed that access to the Kartarpur Gurudwara would be raised. Would this not have been substantive talks? And doesn’t that amount to a dialogue?

Yet, 24 hours after agreeing to a meeting, the Indian government called off the talks. The two reasons it gave are far from convincing. They only raise further questions.

First, it cited the killing of three special police officers at Shopian. However, as this newspaper has reported, already this year 37 Kashmiri policemen have fallen to militant bullets while 13 BSF jawans have been killed along the Line of Control or international border. If the earlier 50 deaths did not preclude a meeting it’s strange that three more should have scuppered it.

The government’s second reason for calling off the talks is even more bizarre. It’s the stamps issued by the Pakistani postal service which glorify Kashmiri terrorists, in particular, Burhan Wani. Whilst, no doubt, the stamps are offensive and provocative, they were issued in July and before the elections that brought the Imran Khan government to power. It hardly makes sense to cite them two months later. That suggests the government was earlier unaware of them which, if true, would be perplexing.

Finally, the statement calling off the talks seems to deliberately break with the careful tone and moderate language India has used in the past. Instead, it spoke of Pakistan’s “evil agenda” and the “true face of the new Prime Minister of Pakistan, Imran Khan”. No doubt Mr Khan was equally intemperate and personal in his response, but India’s former high commissioners to Pakistan have not withheld their criticism of the Indian statement.

So what exactly happened? Indeed, will we ever be told? This time, at least, our newspapers and television channels have raised the right questions but the government has retreated behind a wall of silence. Beyond the external affairs ministry spokesperson, no one has thought it fit to explain anything.

To say the least, this is strange behaviour in a democracy. Meanwhile, Pakistan has been left to look like the aggrieved party or, at least, the one interested in taking the first step to improve relations. What a strange, if not inexplicable, turn of events.

 


Army dons a different role at LoC, wins over hearts Soldiers distribute candies to kids

Army dons a different role at LoC, wins over hearts

An Army officer reaches out to a child near the Line of Control in Poonch sector. Tribune Photo: Inderjeet Singh

Amir Karim Tantray

Tribune News Service

Poonch, September 28

The Army is mostly busy in tackling militancy in the hinterland and infiltration along the Line of Control (LoC), but when soldiers have some free time, they mingle with locals and win their hearts in different ways.In this border area, locals, mostly children, were seen treating men in olive green with great respect. Whenever an Army vehicle passed through a civilian area, children offered salute to soldiers. Officers and soldiers reciprocated with love and presented chocolates and sweets to the children. “This was not the case earlier when our battalion was posted on the forward post. Earlier, people used to stay away and children used to run away on seeing soldiers and our vehicles,” said Colonel Bhupinder Singh, Commanding Officer of the unit posted in the Poonch sector along the LoC. “But through our sustained efforts to mingle with people, we have been able to earn their love, respect and confidence,” said Colonel Bhupinder Singh. An Army officer stopped his vehicle and offered chocolates to children moving on the road. Due to this humane nature of the Army, people’s approach towards the Army has changed. “Such is the bonding now that children ask us about our well-being and that of our families,” the Commanding Officer said. Despite threat of infiltration, the Army has allowed locals to graze their cattle and perform agricultural activities near the forward posts. The local Army unit also comes to the help of locals when they are faced with any difficulty.


And the real winners of the strike are..by . Maj Gen Ashok Mehta (Retd)

Now even martyrdom has been politicised. The families of the brave refuse to perform the last rites until the relevant lawmaker has done his sacred duty. A political leader even questioned the fuss over deaths. “Soldiers are paid to die,” he said.

And the real winners of the strike are...

Maj Gen Ashok Mehta (Retd)
Former GOC, IPKF, Sri Lanka

We should not be overplaying Surgical Strikes Day as its primary purpose is not eulogising the soldier but extolling the virtues of the BJP’s political leadership. Undoubtedly the Special Forces’ action was uniquely commendable. Make no mistake. This is a case of revelling in reflected glory. Therefore, it was extremely disingenuous on the part of Human Resources Development (HRD) Minister Prakash Javadekar to say the UGC has issued an advisory to universities to celebrate Surgical Strikes Day on 29 September. Government has also asked TV channels and FM Radio to invoke nationalism on 29 September.

This unprecedented carte blanche makes India resemble the neighbour across the border as manufactured display of patriotism is with an eye on elections, 2019. Schools and colleges will make enemy dummies and re-enact encounters along the border to instil affection for soldiers. Drilling nationalism by diktat is never a good idea. Why was the first anniversary of Surgical Strikes not celebrated last year? We commemorate Vijay Diwas, Kargil Day and Army, Navy and Air Force Days.  The government does not realise that sending female ministers to tie rakhi on soldiers in Siachen or lip servicing gallantry of soldiers has a political objective: instead of placing soldiers on a pedestal the government puts its own record on high ground.

Why not Operation Cactus?

The government does not celebrate Operation Cactus the superb surgical strike in the Maldives in 1988 or numerous surgical strikes during Operation Parakram and many other clandestine operations. But shallow cross-LoC multiple raids which Pakistan denied, and which did not achieve their political mission of curbing, if not eliminating, cross border terrorism, is tom tommed in reality, to publicise the decisiveness of the political leadership rather than the heroics of the Special Forces. All the soldiers who participated in the Operation were awarded gallantry medals but its key architect, former Army Chief Gen Dalbir Suhag remains unrecognised.

The real winners of the surgical strikes are Prime Minister Modi, Party President Amit Shah and then Defence Minister Parrikar. The post-surgical strike politicisation of the army was unabashed. In Lucknow, weeks after the operation, surgical strikes were equated with the 1971 war victory. I chanced to be in Lucknow with HQ Central Command and was aghast to witness banners and posters across town portraying Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, now GoC-in-C Northern Command (then DGMO) flanked by Modi, Shah and Parrikar. Not just that, shortly later, Modi was felicitated at a civic reception at Lucknow with the award of the mythological mace of victory – the conqueror in chief. Elections in UP were close at hand.

Just a month ago, Shah said: “why should we not publicise the surgical strikes during the elections?’ Why not? Because it politicises the military which thanks to its ethos, traditions and ethics, has remained professional, secular and apolitical whereas a large number of elected representatives in Parliament have criminal cases against them. The Chief Minister of the largest state probably has a dubious record. The infamous Coffingate implicated a Defence Minister who was finally cleared by India’s highest court. Now even martyrdom has been politicised – the families of the brave refuse to perform the last rites until the relevant MP/MLA/Minister has done his sacred duty. A political leader even questioned the fuss over deaths. ‘Soldiers are paid to die,’ he said.

Wuhan killed `Doklam Day’

The BJP has left no stone unturned to extract political mileage from the surgical strikes. In every Modi election speech, it is given star billing. Modi had considered a Doklam Day but Wuhan dissuaded him.

During the Karnataka election this year, he created a faux pas. Instead of focussing on the Kodavas (Coorg) martial spirit and the record number of Generals Coorg had produced, he got his military history all muddled. Coorg has produced two Army Chiefs, one a Field Marshal: KC Cariappa and KS Thimaya. Modi claimed the Congress had humiliated them which is factually incorrect. Field Marshal Cariappa’s son Air Marshal Cariappa was livid but generous, only blaming Modi’s speech writers. But the damage to Kodava pride and heritage had been done.

Extracting loyalty

The Rafale has taken centre stage. The government has ensured that senior serving officers of the IAF attended a seminar normally populated with veterans and a houseful of media to staunchly defend the cost, modalities and virtues of the contract.

No one is questioning the versatility or combat supremacy of the Rafale: only how it has been turned into a political football to the detriment of the morale of the IAF, DRDO and HAL. This marathon political battle is not ending anytime soon as national security has become a combat casualty.

To his credit, Modi is unstinting in his praise for soldiers — surgical strikes et al — but when it comes to the Seventh Pay Commission, short-changed them. There was imperfect implementation of OROP and meagre amounts were allocated for modernisation (BJP MP and former Union Minister Gen (Retd.) BC Khanduri, chairman of the standing committee on defence, was prematurely removed from his post for his criticism of inadequate funding of defence). He is silent on both issues. That is his style: skirt the difficult questions.

After the surgical strikes day… maybe soon we might have a Rafale Day.