Sanjha Morcha

Hit stone-pelters with bullets, says BJP MP Vats

Hit stone-pelters with bullets, says BJP MP Vats

Chandigarh, June 11

BJP Rajya Sabha member D P Vats has said stone-pelters in Kashmir Valley should be hit with bullets.Pakistan has started a proxy war with the country and each day our forces in Jammu and Kashmir are being attacked, the former commandant of Pune’s Armed Forces Medical College said on Sunday.”…I am of the opinion that stone-pelters should be hit with bullet,” Vats said when asked about the Jammu and Kashmir government’s decision to withdraw cases against people involved in stone-pelting incidents.Pakistan has not learnt a lesson despite tasting defeat many times in direct wars with India and is now engaged in proxy war, the retired lieutenant general told reporters on the sidelines of a function in Bhiwani yesterday.When PTI today asked him if he stood by his comment, Vats said, “I am an Army officer, the Army has been fighting a proxy war waged by Pakistan for a long time. What does my soldier fighting this proxy war on ground in Kashmir expect of me? As an Army officer, I stand by what I have said.”He also said each day bodies of soldiers killed in Kashmir are sent to their native places.”What should soldiers expect of their officers? We cannot let down their morale. They cannot be attacked and pelted with stones,” he said.Vats (69), who hails from Hisar, was recently elected to the Upper House of Parliament. He had served as the director and commandant of the prestigious AFMC, Pune.He has also served as the chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission between May 2011 and April 2012 during the Bhupinder Singh Hooda-led Congress government in the state. On June 1, two youths were injured after they had allegedly been hit by a CRPF vehicle during clashes between protesters and security forces in Nowhatta area here in the summer capital of Jammu and Kashmir.The duo was taken to SKIMS hospital at Soura here where one of them-Kaiser Bhat-succumbed around midnight. – PTI


Hospital owner claims Rs 16 crore from army for treating jawan son

District officials visited the Ayurvedic hospital and sealed it till further orders.

An ayurvedic hospital in Bhind has claimed Rs 16 crore as expenses for treating the head injury of a sepoy in the Indian Army.

Interestingly, the sepoy identified as Saurav Rajavat, a jawan in the infantry regiment, is the son of the owner of the ayurvedic hospital.

According to the Bhind district administration, Dr IS Rajavat who owns an ayurvedic hospital in the Raun area treated his son Saurabh from 2014 to 2017 and claimed Rs 16 crore as medical expenses.

Saurabh Rajavat was treated with allopathic medicines even though the hospital owned by Rajawat is an ayurvedic hospital.

Army authorities have asked the district administration to look into the hospital’s functioning.

Saurabh Rajavat suffered a head injury while on duty in 2013 and was treated at a private hospital. “He came home in 2014 and from then on his father treated him as he had not fully recovered. The treatment went on till 2017 and the matter came to light when the army received a medical reimbursement of Rs 16 crore,” a district administration official told India Today TV.

“The matter was then referred to the district collector who further marked the matter to the chief medical officer of the state,” the official said.

The army had received two bills of Rs 6 crore each while the third claim was of Rs 4 crore.

On Thursday evening, district officials visited the ayurvedic hospital and sealed it till further orders.

Dr IS Rajavat, however, denied any foul play. “I had submitted three bills. Two were of Rs 60,000 while the third was of Rs 40,000. In total, I had claimed a total of Rs 1.6 lakh. I don’t know how it became Rs 16 crore,” he said.

He also alleged that the army was trying to hide facts as his son, according to him, was hit with an iron rod by a subedar.

“The army got him treated at a private hospital. This was done to hide facts and when his situation did not improve, I started his treatment which ultimately yielded results,” he said.

The district administration has claimed that the matter is being investigated and further action would be taken against the guilty only after investigations are over.


‘All would’ve been killed, but for our brave youth’ Shillong’s Punjabi Lane residents still jittery as normalcy returns

‘All would’ve been killed, but for our brave youth’

Curfew relaxed: People move around at Punjabi Lane in Shillong on Thursday. Tribune Photo

Bijay Sankar Bora

Tribune News Service

Shillong, June 7

http://

“Had our youth from Punjabi Lane not put up a brave resistance, they (the aggressors) would have resorted to genocide,” recounted Gurjeet Singh, the secretary of the Harijan Panchayat Committee and president of the Gurdwara Committee at Punjabi Lane, Bara Bazar, here.“A 400-strong mob, armed with weapons and petrol bombs, came with the obvious intention to raze the colony. The police were caught offguard. But 30-40 youths from the colony, carrying swords, repulsed the attack. Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) P Pandey did a commendable job in saving us,” Gurjeet Singh told The Tribune. Punjabi lane has the oldest gurdwara in Meghalaya that was built in 1893. Over the years, because of the burgeoning population of Scheduled Caste Sikhs and other non-tribal communities, the place has turned into a ghetto. Residents come out on the street from their ramshackle dwellings, work and go back. “The process of relocation of residents from Punjabi Colony was initiated way back in 1987. All state governments since then have failed to solve the problem.

http://

Original land documents are with us. There have been legal issues, but court rulings have been in our favour. If they could evict us legally, they would have done so long ago. But they know they can’t and now intend to resort to force to scare us away,” the community leader said.“When our forefathers arrived here, it was a jungle. Now that the area has become a prime location, they (local Khasi tribe) want to capture it by any means. The latest violence is the handiwork of powerful politicians and some NGOs who want to set up business here. Those who came to attack were merely tools in their hands,” said Baba Joginder Singh, another community leader, who is Jathedar, North East Zone Rangreta Dal.Even as life is limping back to normal with curfew in Punjabi Lane rescheduled (2 pm to 5 am), the residents continue to remain jittery. A high-level committee formed by Chief Minister Conrad Sangma to examine the long-standing demand for relocating Punjabi Lane residents held its first meeting and decided to begin the process of collecting documents. The committee chairman and Deputy CM, Preston Tyngson, said they would meet again soon. 

 


When Veterans Forget the Unity of the Military to Play Politics Instead BY LT. GENERAL BHOPINDER SINGH

Political polarisation


 As the institutional angst of the Armed Forces brews— following questionable orders like lifting of traffic restrictions for civilians in the cantonments, utilising military manpower to clear garbage or build railway bridges, inaccurate spin-doctoring of military heroes in electioneering, cuts in order for the assault rifles, unending OROP sophistry—blame for the debilitation of the institution invariably falls on the politico-bureaucrat combine or the ostensibly servile, serving ‘Generalship’ of the Armed Forces.

Somewhere conveniently, as the surrogate ‘voice’ of the Armed Forces, the Veterans, have incredulously forgotten their own actions (or inactions) as the systematic degradation and devaluation of the institution, started at the time of Independence itself.

The fact remains that as the legitimate and only plausible ‘voice’ of the institution, the Veterans too have got too politically polarised and dangerously disunited in either defending or venting against the dispensation of the day.

2014 General Elections was the turning point in the political baptism of the Veterans, with the Rewari rally assuming the defining moment of the political usurpation of the ‘Indian Soldier’.

Ironically, the electoral gratification of appropriating the imagery of the ‘Indian Soldier’ was not just to bank the Veteran vote, in as much as it was to build compelling credentials of political-muscularity, ultra-nationalism and governance-decisiveness that would logically accrue to any political party that sought to project itself as the champion of the ‘Indian Soldier’.

Post-elections, political pragmatism and basic disinterest ensured a sub-optimal One Rank One Pension (OROP), continuing shortages in weaponry and equipment, and the unthinkable spectre of war heroes languishing on the footpaths of Delhi. However, armed with promises (later clarified as jumlaas), a new phenomenon of ‘primetime warriors’ emerged in the TV newsrooms, resplendent in their tilted Military caps, blunting any contrarian views with an immediate moral/nationalistic cover, that was afforded naturally to Veterans.

Unknowingly, the politicalisation of the ‘Indian Soldier’ ensued in full swing and the politicians were delighted to use the invaluable ‘covering fire’ offered by the Veterans in slamming any opposition view as ‘anti-national’, in an ever expanding interpretation.

The concept of ‘larger good’ ensured that the inherent untruths in overtly political claims like ‘first time ever’ (prefixed to the ‘Surgical Strikes’) were allowed to become a gospel-truth. And even when some partisan Veterans were challenged on the specific claims, they fired back with arguments referring to undeniable blunders of previous dispensations, as the justification for ‘minor’ inaccuracies.

The groundswell of ultra-nationalism was inadvertently injected with the emotional testosterone offered by the ‘newsroom warriors’ who allowed political moves to be defended as prudent for the Armed Forces.

This led the wily politicians to obfuscate uncomfortable decisions like demonetisation, student protests etc. in the inexplicable context of the ‘Indian Soldier’!

Political deflection was further afforded by finger-pointing to the past trysts with the likes of VK Menon, Nehru or even Mulayam Singh as the Defence Minister – and a sweeping political narrative of ‘one better than the other’ was successfully constructed and delivered to the political classes by some Veterans.

Rectitude and the deliberately apolitical moorings which are the cornerstone of a professional military in any democracy, were sadly the foremost casualty in the new construct of the institutional domain. And the ‘voice’ of the Veterans acquired a distinctly political slant with a proselytizing tone, militating against the age-old ethos of ‘band of brothers’ or the spirit of ‘leave no man behind’, that defines the soldering code, profession and unity.

It is no one’s case that the Veterans should not partake of political opportunities post-retirement.In fact, there is an urgent need for more participation. Given their leadership experience in the most challenging of environment the Veterans can certainly be utilised for better governance.

In the US, one in every five lawmaker is a Veteran – however when it comes to the issues pertaining to the institution of the Armed Forces, a ‘closing of ranks’ in the best interest of the institution usually plays out, irrespective and often contrary to their own party positions.

For instance Republican John Kasich had refused to endorse Donald Trump’s Presidential nomination following his infamous diatribe against a slain Muslim US soldier. Kasich had noted, “There’s only one way to talk about Gold Star parents: with honour and respect”. Or again as another Republican and veteran John McCain fighting cancer has recently made clear that he would not want Donald Trump at his funeral.

The algorithms of religion, region, caste or race that define political debates are natural anathema to a soldier and the armed forces, hence the need to protect the domain from any political affiliation, misuse and appropriation. In India, some Veterans have surrendered that apolitical high-ground.

A monolithic military ‘voice’ that singularly swears to the Constitution of the India and not to an individual or political party on matters pertaining to the Armed Forces, is the most powerful push-back to any potential misuse, mishandling and degradation of the institution.

Veterans cannot allow themselves to pawn away their unmatched moral currency at the altar of political intrigues, language and guile.

The politico-bureaucrat combine can only damage the institution if allowed, and it is this breach of institutional camaraderie and apolitical high-ground that has opened the floodgates for invasive division.

All political parties irrespective of their ideologies, agendas and professed concerns have contributed to the current morass. The Veterans must go beyond the charming optics of Defence Ministers flying the de riguer fighter plane, and insist on probity, responsibilities and accountabilities.

It is time for serious introspection within the Veterans to coalesce on military matters, whilst, freely holding on to their political positions and enthusiasms on all other fronts.

(Lt General Bhopinder Singh (Retd) is Former Lt Governor of Andaman and Nicobar Islands & Puducherry)


Cannot tolerate Pakistan becoming haven for terror groups: Haley

Cannot tolerate Pakistan becoming haven for terror groups: Haley

Nikki Haley addresses a gathering on advancing India-US relations, in New Delhi, June 28. Reuters

New Delhi, June 28

Pakistan becoming a haven for terror groups cannot be tolerated and the US has already delivered the message to Islamabad, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said on Thursday.“We cannot turn a blind eye to those harbouring terrorists… Communicating to Pakistan that this cannot be tolerated,” she said while delivering a lecture at a think tank here.She also said that India and the US must be global leaders in the fight against terrorism adding “we can and must do more”.    Touching upon a variety of issues, she said freedom of religion is very important and that a nation such as “ours can only be held together by tolerance”.     On China, she said the country was important but noted that its expansion in the region has been a matter of concern for the US and many other countries as Beijing does not share democratic values.Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent remarks at the Shangri-la dialogue in Singapore to ensure freedom of navigation and stability in the Indo-Pacific, she said President Donald Trump also believes in this vision.Haley said the US supports India’s membership in Nuclear Suppliers Group as it is a nuclear state which is widely respected.She was speaking at the Observer Research Foundation. — PTI


Afterlife for soldiers: Taking better care for less by Ravi Bhushan

The low allocation for defence modernisation has led to demands to downsize the forces. We instead need to examine options that rehabilitate the ex-soldier but reduce his upkeep. The savings can be utilised for importing military hardware.

Afterlife for soldiers: Taking better care for less

WINDS OF CHANGE: A retiring soldier can no longer fall back on the comfort of a joint family.

Ravi Bhushan

The Tribune had reported on June 13 that the Army Chief has given the go-ahead for cadre review.  It has been pointed out that a major chunk of allocated defence budget is spent on salaries and pensions and the money left for modernisation is not adequate to meet even essential upgradation of equipment.  The situation is challenging.The current allocation for defense is 1.57 percentage of GDP but defence experts want the outlay to be at least three percent of GDP keeping in view our heavy dependence on import-oriented modernisation. Given its functional requirements, the Army is a manpower intensive organisation. Downsizing of existing manpower is neither in the best interest of our security needs nor effective functioning of the army. In order to deliver results, the Army keeps its manpower profile young. Research shows that after the age of 35, the body starts undergoing depreciation particularly in terms of physical strength, stamina and agility.  Therefore, one may conclude that the real combat age is up to 42 to 45 years subject to normal conditions. As such, retaining manpower beyond 45 years of age, regardless of the rank they hold, has deleterious effect on the fighting capability of the force. As a result, the structure of the armed forces, particularly the Army is such that 70-80 per cent manpower is discharged from service in the age profile of 35-42.  Every year around 50,000 soldiers from Army, Navy and Air Force exit the services and seek second employment in civil life.  The prime of their youth is spent in services, frequently moving from one place of duty to another and by and large remaining disconnected from normal societal life. When they come home, they have prime responsibilities and obligations in terms of financial and social to fulfil since children have grown up by that time.A radical change came about after 1985 in terms of socio-economic background of soldiers.  Earlier, majority of the soldiers used to come from the agrarian background and after completion of their regular engagement they would return home with a modest pension and happily settle down in their family profession or business. The joint family system also helped to a large extent in getting them settled.However, after 1990s, sociometry of manpower joining armed forces has undergone a sea-change.  Though, educational standards increased, most of youth are from weaker social-economic-political background. Therefore, it has become an inescapable necessity for them to seek regular employment after leaving the armed forces. As a result, every ex-serviceman tries his best to get a regular government job. This has brought about joblessness among ex-soldiers owing to the fact that reserved opportunities in government and semi-government sectors are not good enough to absorb such a large number of ex-servicemen. Further, it would be appropriate to throw light on major three segments of ESM. First is JCO or equivalent; they are generally in the age group of 48 to 52 and financially better than ORs (Havildar or equivalent), owing to higher salary and better pension after implementation of 7th Central Pay Commission. They also get employment easily in public as well as private sector given to their supervisory status and skills.The second segment of ESM is ORs.  They constitute 90 per cent of total manpower and always remains in tow, carrying out the orders and instructions of their superiors so as to achieve organisational objectives besides routine active duties involving a round-the-clock schedule. Without this segment, existence of armed forces cannot be imagined.  This segment also faces the heat of maximum casualities in terms fatal injuries and permanent disabilities in the line of operational duty. Since the promotion to the ranks of JCOs or equivalent is limited, 70 to 80 per cent of the ORs quit and join the que for jobseekers in civilian life.But job opportunites in the public sector are limited, and they are compelled to move to private sector where they are offered nothing beyond the post of security guard. Only a few get respectable, reasonable and gainful employment in the private sector based on their skills and educational background.Three-pronged strategyThe way forward to minimise the pension bill and ensure availability of funds for modernisation and rehabilitation of young ex-servicemen is:

  • The policy of pre-release course for defence personnel of all ranks must be abolished forthwith. Instead, every defence personnel leaving force in the age profile of 37-45 should be made eligible for two years last salary drawn so as to enable him to acquire skill or education or course of his choice. This may be termed as post-discharge educational grant.
  • Centre and state governments should work together in providing regular jobs to ORs (Havildar and below) immediately after a soldier is released. The pension system should be abolished, in the process releasing a huge army of clerks. They should be entitled to gratuity with the formula of one month per year basis. In case, a person is unwillingness to join a regular government job, he should be given a golden handshake so as to facilitate a respectable and viable settlement in civil life.
  • JCOs or equivalent should not be considered ESM for the purpose of job reservation since their salary and pension have substantially have increased.

 


Army orders force restructuring

Army orders force restructuring

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, June 22

The Army has issued a formal order that looks to re-cast, right-size and restructure the officer cadre so as to make it ready for future battles. There are around 39,000 officers in the Army.A high-level committee headed by the Military Secretary—a Lieut General rank officer—has been tasked to study all aspects and submit a report by November-end. A “convening order” for cadre restructuring has been issued by Vice-Chief of the Army Lt Gen Devraj Anbu.The Tribune was the first to report in its edition dated June 13 that Army Chief General Bipin Rawat had okayed cadre restructuring. The “convening order” issued on June 18 lays down terms of reference for the committee.The recommendations of the Ajai Vikram Singh Committee (AVSC) will be kept in mind. The report submitted by former Defence Secretary Ajai Vikram Singh was accepted in 2004.The committee will make projections for futuristic growth and consequent manpower requirements.“The cadre-review exercise should not be misconstrued as a process of up-gradation of posts, or increase in number of higher ranks or be driven by competitive pressure from other services,” says the order.Futuristic projections should form the basis for induction and reduction of officers. An existing study on rightsizing will be considered. The committee will also “examine and identify likely areas for reduction, with focus on the base (entry level)”, says the order.At present, upward cadre mobility of Colonel is slow. The committee has been asked to review existing Corps and even suggest a merger. The Army wants segregation of combat and administrative manpower needs. It is also looking to empower jawans and identify posts on which they can be promoted. The issue of officers who get overlooked at the level of Lieut Colonel (about 36-37 years of age), but continue in service till 54 years of age, will also be addressed.The committee will also suggest what should be the ratio of short-service commissioned officers, who will leave after serving for 10-14 years.The review comes amid rising wage bills. In the ongoing fiscal (ending March 31, 2019), the Army salary bill is budgeted at Rs 80,945 crore and the pension bill at Rs 95,949 crore. In contrast, the modernisation budget is Rs 26,688 crore.For futuristic growth

  • A committee has been tasked to study all aspects as regards restructuring the officer cadre and submit a report by November-end
  • The panel will also make projections for futuristic growth and consequent manpower requirements

Aurangzeb inspiration to nation: Nirmala Visits martyr’s family, forward posts in Poonch

Aurangzeb inspiration to nation: Nirmala

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman meets the father and other family members of Rifleman Aurangzeb in Poonch on Wednesday. PTI

Tribune News Service

Jammu, June 20

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday described the supreme sacrifice of Rifleman Aurangzeb, who was abducted and killed by militants in Pulwama district, and his family as an inspiration for the entire country.Sitharaman said this after visiting the family of Aurangzeb at Salani village in Poonch district. The minister was accompanied by senior Army officers.“I have come here to meet the martyr’s family and spend some time with them. One message I can take back is that here’s a family, here’s a martyr, who, to me and I am sure to the whole nation, stands out as an inspiration,” the Defence Minister told mediapersons.She stayed with the family for about half an hour and handed over a welfare cheque of Rs 5 lakh to Aurangzeb’s father. She also presented shawls to martyr’s brothers and sisters.On June 18, Army Chief General Bipin Rawat had visited the family and had said that the supreme sacrifice by “the brave son of India” would not go in vain. Gen Rawat had assured all possible assistance to the family.Mohammad Hanief, Aurangzeb’s father and an ex-serviceman, had made a passionate appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to avenge the killing of his unarmed son and reiterated his resolve to sacrifice his life for the country.Meanwhile, the Defence Minister also visited forward posts along the Line of Control (LoC) in the Krishna Ghati sector and interacted with the troops.“On her official visit to the state, the minister was briefed by the GOC, Ace of Spades Division, on the prevailing security situation and steps being taken to maintain a close vigil on the LoC and maintain peace in the hinterland,” a Defence spokesperson said.He said the minister also interacted with soldiers and complimented them on their exemplary devotion towards maintaining sanctity of the LoC and giving a befitting reply to the inimical forces.Interacts with soldiers in Krishna Ghati sector 

  • The Defence Minister also visited forward posts along the Line of Control (LoC) in the Krishna Ghati sector and interacted with the troops.
  • She complimented the soldiers on their exemplary devotion towards maintaining sanctity of the LoC and giving a befitting reply to the inimical forces.

 


At RSS HQ, Pranab preaches tolerance

Says any attempt to define India through religion, intolerance will dilute its existence

At RSS HQ, Pranab preaches tolerance

Pranab Mukherjee being welcomed by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. PTI

Aditi Tandon

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, June 7

Warning that hatred and intolerance diluted national identity, former President and Congress veteran Pranab Mukherjee on Thursday spoke from an RSS platform to declare nationalism was not bound by race or religion.As his visit to the RSS headquarters in Nagpur to address new recruits of the organisation sparked criticism from Congress leaders, including his daughter, Mukherjee cautioned that any attempt to define India through “religion, dogma or intolerance” would only dilute the country’s existence.His half-an-hour address had a lesson for everyone. To the RSS, the former President recalled “vasudhaiv kutumbakam” (the world is one family) as the soul of Indian nationalism; to new Sangh recruits he spoke of the need for harmony; to his parent party Congress, he emphasised the need for dialogue and to PM Narendra Modi, he quoted Kautilya’s lessons in governance.Unfazed by the fact that he was standing with people he had ideologically opposed all his life, Mukherjee used the occasion to drive home “diversity and acceptance” as the bedrock of Indian nationalism and to remind the pracharaks of the need for unity.“We derive our strength from tolerance. We accept and respect our pluralism. We celebrate our diversity. Any attempt at defining our nationhood in terms of dogmas and identities of religion, region, hatred and intolerance will only lead to dilution of our national identity,” the former President said.To sceptics, including his daughter Sharmishtha, the ex-President said informed public engagement was essential in democracy. “A dialogue is necessary not only to balance competing interests, but also to reconcile them. We may argue, may agree, may not agree but we cannot deny the existence of multiplicity of opinions,” he said.Wading through India’s past, Mukherjee spoke of how through 3,500 years of being ruled by dynasts, India’s 5,000 years of civilisational unity remained unchanged while foreign elements were absorbed to create a new synthesis of national unity.“Multiplicity of cultures, faith and languages makes us special,” Mukherjee repeated to 707 pracharaks, passing out after rigorous RSS training. He carefully dotted his speech with quotes from S Radhakrishnan, Rabindranath Tagore, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Bal Gangadhar Tilak to hammer home his point. “When Tilak spoke of swaraj, he meant a swaraj for people encompassing all castes and religions and languages.” He lauded the Constitution at a gathering full of RSS sympathisers, saying, “For us, democracy is not a gift, but a sacred trust… The Constitution is not a legal document but a Magna Carta for the socio-economic transformation of society. From our Constitution flows our nationalism.”The former President also commented on the “routine of violence” in the country, saying India may be the fastest growing economy but it was lagging on the World Happiness Index.“You are young. I must tell you that manifestations of rage are tearing our social fabric. We must free public discourse of violence, both physical and verbal. We must move from anger and conflict to love and harmony. Our motherland is asking for happiness. Our motherland deserves happiness,” Mukherjee said as he marveled the fact that 1.3 billion Indians used 120 languages, 1,600 dialects, followed seven major religions, belonged to three ethnic groups and still stood united under one flag, one Constitution and one identity.“This is Bhartiyata,” the former President said at the RSS headquarters after he had paid tributes to Sangh founder KB Hedgewar, calling him a “great son of Mother India”. Earlier, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat spoke of the irrelevance of controversy around Mukherjee’s visit.Veiled message to PM  “When we go to Parliament, just above the lift at gate no. 6 is inscribed Kautilya’s quote “In the happiness of people lies the happiness of the king, their welfare is his welfare. The State is for the people. People are at the centre of all activities of the State and nothing should be done to divide them. The aim of the State should be to galvanise them to fight a concerted war against poverty, disease and deprivation. Only then can we create a nation where nationalism flows automatically.”Message to Sangh“India’s nationhood is not one language, one religion and one enemy. It is perennial universalism of 1.3 billion people who use 122 languages and 1,600 dialects… practise 7 major religions… live under one system, one flag and one identity of being Bharatiya and have no enemies. ” — Pranab Mukherjee, former President Bhagwat on visit“Pranab Mukherjee will remain what he is and the Sangh will remain the Sangh even after the event. The RSS wants to unify the entire society and no one is an outsider for it. People may have different views but they are all children of mother India.” — Mohan Bhagwat, RSS Chief(With inputs from Shiv Kumar)

‘Dirty tricks at play’

Tagging a morphed picture showing Pranab sporting the RSS cap, his daughter and Congress leader Sharmishtha Mukherjee said: “See, this is exactly what I was fearing and warned my father about. Not even few hours have passed, but BJP/RSS dirty tricks dept is at work in full swing!”— Agencies

 


Civil-Military Relations: Let’s Not Weaken the Corporate Character of Our Forces by *Lt Gen (Retd) DS Hooda*

Two groups are today dominating discussions about civil-military relations in India. The first group is the veterans who continue to protest over the definition of OROP. Recent images of soldiers and their wives being pushed and shoved into police vans has again brought into focus their long-standing demand. The second is a group of junior officers from the services who think that their career interests have been ignored and have gone to the Supreme Court. Grant of NFU to the military is another case pending in the same court.
There is also considerable consternation in the military leadership over the issue of status parity. And this leadership is not the few Generals, Admirals and Marshals but the approximately 50,000 officers, a vast majority of whom are middle and young level officers. They directly lead men on land, sea and air and put themselves at maximum risk. The whole issue of the military being a Group A or Group B service is bewildering to them. And justifications about the military being neither Group A nor B, being advanced by some of our own senior officers, are inexplicable.
It is often argued that it is only a handful of veterans and serving officers who are actually complaining, and that their demands are unreasonable. Both these statements could be true but it does not naturally follow that these will not have any impact on the character of the military ethic. This is what should worry us all.
One of the cornerstones of the military ethic is its Corporateness. Members share a strong group identity based on common values and pride in their very critical responsibility towards the nation. Within this corporate structure is a strict hierarchy of ranks. If today members of the military prefer to take to the streets or the courts of law, rather than relying on their senior leaders, it could weaken the corporate character of the military.
The military is a unique profession. No other profession demands that your primary role is to lay down your life in the pursuit of your duty. General John Hackett, in his book The Profession of Arms, called it the concept of “unlimited liability”. In Jammu and Kashmir alone we lose more than 200 soldiers each year, not only battling terrorists but also to the brutal terrain and weather.
To get men and women to accept this huge sacrifice requires a forging of character where the best of values come to fore. Hackett wrote that qualities such as courage, fortitude and loyalty are deliberately fostered, not because they are desirable, but because they are “essential to military efficiency.”
What is the current civil-military dispute about? Is it about more pay, privileges or a better lifestyle? There can be no comparison in lifestyle because no individual in any other profession earning an equivalent salary lives in a 10 x 10 foot bunker where you are snowed under for six months. The soot from the 1945-style heater, which is fired by kerosene oil, is an all pervading presence, from your hair to the fingernails to the choked nostrils. The privilege is nothing more than a bunch of great comrades who are suffering the same privations.
The real fight is about honour. Honour or ‘Izzat’ is the edifice on which the ethical and moral foundation of any military rests. Traditionally, the Indian military has given great value to the concept of honour — the honour of the unit which must always be protected and personal honour which drives a man even in the face of certain death. If officers and men feel unwanted and under-privileged it could weaken this edifice. Unfortunately, this fact is not given enough attention. Putting out tweets and spending time with soldiers during festivals is a great gesture but is not enough to assuage the angst.
There are two different models in the structure of civil-military relations. In The Soldier and the State, Huntington recommends ‘‘objective civilian control’’ that ensures civilian control and maximizes professionalism at the same time. He argues that a highly professional military seeks to distance itself from politics, thus strengthening civilian control. In contrast to Huntington, Morris Janowitz, in The Professional Soldier, argued that the military will invariably come to resemble a political pressure group, and that this is not necessarily a problem as long as it remains ‘‘responsible, circumscribed, and responsive to civilian authority’’. He recommends the military’s ‘‘meaningful integration with civilian values’’.
There are supporters of both models but in India, objective control has been followed and has stood the military in good stead. There is no real need for change, and political parties need to be sensitive to this. Constantly evoking the sacrifice of the Indian Army in every political debate is harmful. It could politically influence soldiers. The loyalty of a soldier is to the military ideal, which is a constant, and not to a political ideology. This is the correct democratic way.
Surely it is nobody’s case that the military is completely losing its professionalism. But problems, however small, if not tackled in time can blindside you. If some cracks are visible, they need to be quickly repaired and not papered over. The government practice of forming of one more committee has now lost its credibility. Decisions will have to come from the political executive.
Minor changes in OROP, grant of NFU (non-functional upgrade), an improvement in career progression, and an honourable status to military personnel are a very small price to pay for ensuring that the character of the military ethic is not diluted. Political leaders, the bureaucracy and senior military leadership must join hands and work towards that goal. This will ultimately not only empower the military but also the nation.
I close with a quote from Huntington, “If the civilians permit the soldiers to adhere to the military standard, the nations themselves may eventually find redemption and security in making that standard their own”.