Sanjha Morcha

India, Pak NSAs met in Thailand, ‘talks on terror’ can go ahead: MEA

India, Pak NSAs met in Thailand, 'talks on terror' can go ahead: MEA
Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar. — ANI

New Delhi, January 11

India on Thursday said National Security Adviser Ajit Doval met his Pakistani counterpart Lt Gen Nasser Khan Janjua (retd) last month in Thailand, noting that “talks on terror” can go ahead.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Raveesh Kumar, the spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, told reporters that the focus of the “operational-level talks” was “cross-border terror” and ways to ensure the elimination of terrorism from the region.”India and Pakistan have a dialogue process and we have said terror and talks cannot go together. However, there are other dialogue mechanisms like at the DGMO level or between the BSF and Pakistan Rangers.”Similarly, the NSA-level engagement is part of operational-level talks. We have said terror and talks cannot go together, but talks on terror can definitely go ahead,” Kumar said.The meeting between the two NSAs took place in Thailand nearly three weeks ago. — PTI


Mohit to play a soldier

Mohit to play a soldier
Historical moment: Mohit Raina

Looks like the entire entertainment industry is inspired to make content on the Battle of Saragarhi! While Akshay Kumar has announced Kesari, Ajay Devgn and Randeep Hooda are also set for films on the same concept. And now, we have a TV show too! In the upcoming show, 21 Sarfarosh: Saragarhi 1897, actor Mohit Raina will be playing the lead. The actor, who was seen playing roles in historical and mythological shows till date, will now be back on screens as soldier Havildar Ishar Singh. Mohit will be seen in his new avatar on Discovery JEET channel, which is scheduled to launch in early 2018. On Friday, the makers released the first look of Mohit as a soldier in the much-awaited show. 21 Sarfarosh: Saragarhi 1897 is a fiction show inspired by the real-life story of 21 brave soldiers of 36th Sikh regiment of the British Indian Army which defended an army outpost at Saragarhi in the North-West Frontier Province against an onslaught by over 10,000 Pashtun and Orakzai tribals in September 1897. 


Indian troops are aggressive along border, says PLA

BOTH THE INDIAN ARMY AND ITBP COMMANDERS HAVE RUBBISHED THE ALLEGATION, SAYING THAT IT WAS THE PLA TROOPERS WHO WERE AGGRESSIVE

NEW DELHI: Despite India and China calling truce along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) after the Special Representative dialogue, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has virtually accused its Indian counterpart of being aggressive although no shot has been fired in 40 years.

The December 22 SR level meeting was the first after the 73-day standoff between India and Chinese PLA was resolved on August 28.

The PLA spokesperson’s statement on Thursday that India should “strictly control” its border troops stems from the August 15, 2017 fisticuffs between the Indian Army and its Chinese counterpart in the Pangong Tso sector.

Before going public, the PLA had made it known through diplomatic channels that its troops had sustained injuries during physical contact with Indian forces during LAC patrolling and claimed that Indian troops were showing undue aggression as if it was “the border with Pakistan”.

However, both the Indian Army and Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) commanders have rubbished the allegation, saying it was PLA troopers who were aggressive and were found to be carrying iron rods and sticks during the Pangong Tso incident.

According to senior officials, Indian troops were sensitive to the requirements of LAC patrolling and were committed to maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border.

The PLA first raised this issue at a Track II dialogue at Chengdu this year, where a senior Chinese Army commander told the participating Indian delegation that New Delhi should not be posting troops “from Pakistan border” to the 3,488-km LAC as they “were found to be very aggressive”.

The commander said the PLA posted its troops to the LAC after sensitising them on the needs of the border with India. He hinted that aggressive troop posturing by Indian commanders could lead to a vertical escalation, which would be detrimental to bilateral relations.

While the PLA statement does not wash with the Indian Army or ITBP, Chinese State Councillor and CCP Politburo member Yang Jiechi was conciliatory with his Indian counterpart and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval during the SR level boundary talks.

According those privy to the talks, the Chinese plate was full with ongoing North Korean and South China Sea crisis and, hence, were all for maintaining peace and tranquillity along the border. The Indian side reciprocated the gesture even though the actual resolution of the India-China boundary is far away.

At the SR level talks, both sides emphasised on the need for the two countries to remain in touch with lines of communication open between the top leadership of India and China and ensure that a Doklam-like situation is not repeated.


Lesson in humility from MIAF himself by Wg cdr DP Sabharwal (retd)

Lesson in humility from MIAF himself

Wg cdr DP Sabharwal (retd)      THERE was a call for you from Delhi,’ said my wife as I entered home. When I enquired who it was, she said she would recollect and let me know later. I did not say anything since dementia was setting in her.‘It was some Arjan Singh,’ she said casually, while clearing the table after lunch. ‘Oh my God!’ was my instant reaction as I rushed to the telephone to retrieve the number from the recording machine. I waited for some hours and called him up in the evening. He was on the line and after the greetings, said: ‘Wing Commander, may I have your permission to change the draft foreword of your book?’ I literally froze. Stumped by his modesty, I managed to mumble: ‘Yes, Sir, my pleasure.’ The few words that, as per military training, should have come out instantly and boldly.He rewrote the foreword: ‘My association with aviation started in 1938 when I joined the Indian Air Force but my curiosity about flying started much earlier when I was a schoolboy and used to see aircraft flying over my village. During my flying training, I flew all fabric and wood aircraft with an uncovered piston engine. In fact, one could see the plugs sparking right in front of you.’ In the covering letter he wrote: ‘You may delete or modify any portion you think does not harmonise with what is given in the book.’ A copybook case of modesty at its best!When I went to present him a copy of the book, 100 years of Aviation, in 2003, he received me, and as I bent down to touch his feet, he appeared to step back a little, but hugged me warmly, and said: ‘I appreciate that you give preference to what you learnt from your parents than what the Air Force would have taught you.’During the next half an hour, over a cup of tea, he enquired about my family and the work I was doing post-retirement. He then went down memory lane to relive the years he had spent in, what he described as,  the glorious Air Force. When I presented him my copy of the book and a pen with a request to sign, he got up, walked to his study table, got a nib-pen, and while writing said: ‘Books should be autographed with ink-pen.’ ‘Yes, Sir’is all that I said. I did not have the courage, or the audacity, to tell him that I was offering him an ink-pen.Before taking his leave, I requested him to allow me to touch his feet again. With a smile, he said: ‘Laylo khushi.’ He then placed his hand on my head and said: ‘Waheguru bless you.’He insisted on seeing me off, saying that guests were to be sent off properly. Out of the porch, he came on to the road where the car was parked. He stood erect while I sat down; the driver started the car. Looking back, I saw him moving only when the car was taking the turn out of the lane. It was then I saluted the Marshal of the Indian Air Force (MIAF), who, without saying much, had taught me an important lesson in decency, humility and graciousness.


HEADLINES PRINT MEDIA NEWS ::19 JAN 2018

  1. EX-SERVICEMEN OF DISTT PATHANKOT COMPLETE GOG TRAINING ( GUARDIANS OF GOVERNANCE )::: KHSUHALI DE RAKHE
  2. Guardians of Governance to ensure transparency in execution of developmental works::Lt Gen TS Shergill
  3. INDIAN ARMY REDUCES VACANCIES FOR IMA PERMANENT COMMISSION
  4. PM MODI & DEFENCE MIN BREAK TRADITION, SKIP ARMY DAY AT-HOME EVENT
  5. ARMY TO HOLD MINI-MARATHON ON JANUARY 22
  6. FLAG WAR TO CONTINUE AT ATTARI-WAGAH BORDER
  7. SEPOY’S LAST RITES PERFORMED WITH FULL HONOURS IN PANIPAT VILLAGE
  8. SEPARATISTS HIT OUT AT ARMY CHIEF
  9. NOT DONE WITH DOKLAM YET BY LT GEN SYED ATA HASNAIN (RETD)
  10. MODI, SUSHMA MISLED NATION ON DOKLAM STANDOFF: CONGRESS
  11. ATTACK HELICOPTER RUDRA FIRST TIME IN R-DAY PARADE
  12. A GENERAL & HIS LOQUACIOUSNESS BY HARISH KHARE
  13. APP FOR ARMY VETERANS IN TELANGANA, ANDHRA ::WILL HELP THEM BOOK ONLINE APPOINTMENTS WITH DOCTORS AT ALL ECHS POLYCLINICS
  14. FIRST WOMAN DEFENCE MINISTER ON SUKHOI
  15. SITHARAMAN FLIES IN SUKHOI FOR 40 MINUTES IN RAJASTHAN

Cross-border friendship in Rome by Vijay Sabharwal

Cross-border friendship in Rome

Vijay Sabharwal

IT’S been seven decades since the Partition, but the relations between India and Pakistan are still complex, verging on hostility. Most people don’t know what goes on across the border, except what their media tells them. But there are many who refuse to harbour animosity against the other. And therefore, whenever they come across each other, they rarely see an enemy. In fact, owing to the similarity in food, culture and language, they tend to become friends with greater ease. I observed this during an exchange programme initiated during the tenure of the Vajpayee government. It is heartening to see those visitors maintaining ties with their counterparts to date. In my own experience, too, I have noticed during my foreign visits that whenever people from these two nations meet, especially in a third country, they go out of their way to help each other. My recent visit to Rome further strengthened my perception about the other side and the desire for amity.I went to enquire about the city tour bus for Vatican City and found that it would cost 22 euros for a ticket and 40 for two. On my way back to the hotel, I was approached by a man offering me two tickets of another bus company for just 36 euros. Apparently, my familiar appearance in a foreign country prompted him to ask if I was an Indian. His face gleamed with joy when I nodded. ‘I am from Pakistan.’ I told him that I was born in Eminabad (now in Pakistan), to which he zealously responded that he was from Lahore.   We began talking. I told him that though I didn’t know much about Pakistan, as I was a child when we moved to India, I had fond memories of my father’s friend, Sheikh Mohammad Ali, who had retired as Principal of Dayal Singh College, Lahore. ‘I used to call him Chachaji and he often visited our place even after the Partition.’ A look of astonishment crossed his face and he exultantly took my hand in his own, saying he was a graduate from Dayal Singh College, and coincidentally, his father had studied under Sheikh saheb in the same college! ‘See how close we are, but it is the politicians who have separated people of the two nations,’ he sighed.Introducing himself as Hanif, he further reduced the ticket price to 32 euros. Meanwhile, my wife joined us. He greeted her and started explaining the itinerary for the tour. When she told him that except for Vatican City we had already visited the rest of the places, he asked us not to waste money on the bus tour, and rather take the Metro. He took us to the nearby station and helped us buy return tickets for only 3 euros each. While we were lauding Hanif on our way back, we happened to meet another Pakistani who got us delicious biryani at reduced rate as a gesture of goodwill.While cherishing Rome’s memories, Hanif’s words often make me ponder whether it is the lack of political will or positive vision that is not allowing these two nations to embrace each other. Whatever it is, the people don’t desire perpetuation of this separation.


Rana Gurjit must go Time to move away from moral squalidness

Rana Gurjit must go

EIGHT months after The Tribune exposed how people of meagre means but close to Punjab Power and Irrigation Minister Rana Gurjit Singh had managed to secure sand mines in auction, the powerful Cabinet member has submitted his resignation. As it turns out, Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh has held on to the resignation letter since January 4 without letting anyone get wind of it. A chance to make the best of a bad situation was lost in May itself, when the Chief Minister could have scored some brownie points by “promptly” removing from the Cabinet a person whose integrity had come under question.

 

By delaying acceptance of the resignation, he is compounding the mistake. There is nothing to consult in this with party president Rahul Gandhi. It is an open-and-shut case of moral shabbiness.Instances of less-than-perfect conduct by members of governments should not surprise anyone. But in this case, it is Capt Amarinder Singh’s personal standing that is at stake.

The reason for that is his well-known close ties with Rana Gurjit Singh, a man of resources. It is understandable that the Chief Minister may have found sacking Rana difficult precisely because he has a reputation that he stands by those who have stood by him. But a choice has become inevitable between obligations of personal friendship and preserving his own name; or worse, letting a tainted person have access to state’s resources. Besides accepting Rana’s resignation, the Chief Minister needs to institute a genuine inquiry — not the earlier eyewash — to see if any legal culpability is made out against the minister who seems to have dabbled in business with the government.Embarrassments over distribution of resources and licences hit the Congress government in Punjab rather early this time.

A lot of precious time and energy of the government, Assembly, and leaders of both the Opposition and the Congress have been taken up in levelling and countering allegations. It is time Capt Amarinder Singh stepped in to visibly put an end to the laissez-faire arrangement in government that every other person seems to be taking advantage of. The Rana distraction must end, and the task of governance be attended to.


Army Day: Weapons, equipment displayed

Army Day: Weapons, equipment displayed
Students look at equipment on display in Bathinda on Monday.

Tribune News Service

Bathinda, January 15

To mark Army Day, the Chetak Corps organised an event, “Know your Army”, at the National Fertilisers Limited complex here today. During the event, various weapons and equipment of the Army were displayed. The objective of the event was to enlighten the public about the defence forces and encourage the youth to join the armed forces.People from various walks of life attended the event, which provided them an opportunity to have a first-hand experience of witnessing infantry weapons, armoured fighting vehicles, communication equipment, air defence guns, artilleries, radars and other equipment.A number of stalls were setup to share information about recruitment and medical services. The event received a good response from school and college students.The district administration and people appreciated the efforts of organisers for holding the event. They said such events provided an opportunity to society to know about their Army.


US trying to convince Pak that India is no threat to it: Defence Minister

US trying to convince Pak that India is no threat to it: Defence Minister
The minister said the perception of India was one of the foundational divergences between Pakistan and the US.

Islamabad, January 16

The US has been trying to convince Pakistan that India is not a threat to it and Islamabad should change its strategic stance towards New Delhi, Defence Minister Khurram Dastagir Khan has said.He said it is time for a courteous yet “ruthlessly candid dialogue” with the US “with everything on the table” to remove all misunderstandings between Islamabad and Washington.Reading out a policy statement on the government’s foreign policy contours and the security situation in Pakistan in the National Assembly on Monday, he regretted that the US downplayed India’s aggressive posturing along the Line of Control (LoC) and Working Boundary, the Dawn reported on Tuesday.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

The minister said the perception of India was one of the foundational divergences between Pakistan and the US.“It’s time for a courteous yet ruthlessly candid dialogue between Pakistan and the US with everything on the table,” the defence minister said.Khan said Washington had been trying to convince Pakistan that India was not a threat and, therefore, Islamabad should change its strategic stance.“But the truism remains true. Both India’s capacity and intents are today hostile towards Pakistan,” he alleged.Pakistan accuses India of using Afghan soil for carrying out hostile activities against it, a charge India has dismissed.Khan alleged that “India has amassed men, material and garrisons along the border with Pakistan” and said that 2017 was the deadliest year in terms of LoC violations by India and the killings of civilians.“India today is a highly militarised and an increasingly belligerent neighbour,” he claimed, adding that the unrelentingly hostile and anti-Pakistan stance taken by the current Indian government had reduced drastically the space for any advocacy of peace.The minister said Pakistan was being made a scapegoat as the US was not winning (the war on terror) in Afghanistan.He said Pakistan had cleared the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Karachi and Balochistan under the Operation Zarb-i-Azb and there were no safe havens for terrorists in the country.He urged the US to recognise the sacrifices Pakistan and its people had made in the war on terror since 2001.He also criticised the US for not pursuing internal reconciliation in Afghanistan, which had now become a safe haven for terrorists. PTI