Sanjha Morcha

‘Had generals not betrayed Sikh army, British would have left in 1857, there would be no Pakistan’

East India Company had huge resources, both in terms of weapons and men. Even if it had lost one battle, it had no dearth of backups. WILLIAM DALRYMPLE, historian

CHANDIGARH:The British may not have had such a long and free run of the country had the Sikh army not been betrayed by its own generals; and there would have been no Pakistan, said Amar Pal Sidhu, a British historian, at the Military Literature Festival here on Saturday. But well-known author William Dalrymple didn’t think it was so simple.

ANIL DAYAL/HT■ Historians Amar Pal Sidhu, Mandeep Rai and Sukhmani Bal Riar talk on Anglo­Sikh wars at the Military Literature Festival that concluded on Saturday.The fodder for discussion on the second day of the fest was the two Anglo-Sikh wars after the death of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Sidhu, who has written two books on it, said that had the Sikhs won these wars, the British would have lost the first war of independence in 1857. “They won only because they had recruited a large number of soldiers from the disbanded Sikh army.”

A DIVIDED DURBAR

Dalrymple, however, said, “The East India Company had huge resources at its disposal, both in terms of weapons and men. Even if it had lost one battle, it had no dearth of backups.”

The Sikh army, on the contrary, was a treacherously led force. The Lahore Durbar itself, he said, was facing factionalism. There was a Dogra faction, a Rani Jindan faction besides many other intrigues, he said.

Yet Mandeep Rai, a former bureaucrat and historian, maintained that had the Sikhs got an edge over the British, the results would have been different regardless of the resources. Maharaja Ranjit Singh had raised a very powerful and cosmopolitan army. “He had Muslim gunners who never fled the battlefield. Then there were Gurkhas, Sikhs and Hindus. It was a most cosmopolitan army.”

But this army had a mind of its own and turned mutinous once he died. Sidhu said, “Unable to govern it, politicians such as General Lal Singh, the vizir, and Tej singh, commander-in-chief, decided to destroy it and ally with the British for stability.”

STAB IN THE BACK

About some of the acts of treachery that let to their defeat, Rai said the Sikh army lost the Battle of Subron because Gen Tej Singh, the commander-in-chief, crossed the pontoon bridge linking the two flanks of the Sutlej and ordered its destruction.

The battle of Firoze Shehar on December 12, 1845, was also lost due by treachery. Rai said General Henry Harding had asked his aide de corps to bring out his sword so he could surrender after the battle that continued till late night. But, next day, the battle changed course due to the machinations of General Lal Singh.

The fallout of Sikh victory over the British, said Sidhu, would have been far-reaching. The Anglo-Afghan wars wouldn’t have taken place as Punjab would have been a strong buffer. “And last but not the least, there would have been no Pakistan as Punjab would have been a secular independent state,” Sidhu declared.

Confessing that he is no expert on the Anglo-Sikh wars, Dalrymple said one reason for the fog that continues to surround the Lahore Durbar is poor access to archives. “The Punjab archives are housed in the Central Punjab Secretariat compound. To get to its gate is a difficult task, leave alone accessing the archives.”

But that hasn’t stopped historians from writing about this chapter of Indian history. Sukhmani Bal Riar, a history professor at Panjab University, read out a long list of scholars who have written on this subject.

Sidhu, who has visited the sites of all these battles, is already working on a third book. And the saga of the wars continues.


On Armed Forces Flag Day, Guv lauds role of soldiers

On Armed Forces Flag Day, Guv lauds role of soldiers
Governor NN Vohra being pinned a flag on Armed Forces Flag Day at Raj Bhawan in Jammu on Thursday. Tribune Photo

Tribune News Service

Jammu, December 7

Governor NN Vohra celebrated Armed Forces Flag Day at a function at Raj Bhawan here today.The Governor observed that Armed Forces Flag Day was an important occasion for remembering the valiant soldiers who had sacrificed their lives for protecting the territorial integrity of the nation.He lauded the crucial role of the Armed Forces, both during war and in peace, and observed that their sacrifices were founded in their bravery, devotion and dedication.Chief Secretary BB Vyas, Principal Secretary to the Governor Umang Narula, Principal Secretary, Home, RK Goyal, Director, Rajya Sainik Board, Brig Harcharan Singh (retd), Maj Gen Sunita Kapoor (retd), Col Rawel Singh (retd), Zila Sainik Welfare Officer, Honarary Captain Sansar Chand (Maha Vir Chakra) and Havildar Rashid Ahmad (retd) were present on the occasion.The Governor urged the ex-servicemen among his guests to promote the interests of society by offering their expertise and suggested to Maj Gen Sunita Kapoor, who retired as the Additional Director General, Military Nursing Services, to consider working for the improvement of health care of women and children in the rural areas of the state.The Governor also urged the decorated soldiers — Honorary Captian Sansar Chand and Havildar (retd) Rashid Ahmad to train youth, particularly girls, so that they can join the Armed Forces.The Governor advised Brig Harcharan Singh (retd) to vigorously campaign throughout the year in the government and private institutions and collect contributions for the Flag Day fund so that a large corpus could be generated for carrying out welfare activities for the ex-servicemen and their families.


MILITARY LITERATURE FESTIVAL Many tears, few words for war-scarred

Not much has been written about the plight and rights of soldiers maimed while answering the call of duty

Bhartesh Singh Thakur

History is written by the victors, they say. War history is no different. It is also about wars, victories, heroes and strategies. Sadly, hardly ever does it talk about those disabled for life in the battlefields. Countless among them continue to fight for decades for pensions and hikes before tribunals and courts in the country.Such is the state of affairs of human resource management in defence forces that irrational orders continue to be contested by the bureaucracy right till the Apex court if favourable orders don’t come from tribunals. The Right to Information Act has come to the aid of disabled soldiers fighting court cases. It enables them to be able to get some information from the otherwise opaque military administration. Earlier, the soldiers would not know why their pensions had been reduced.The lower rung officers in pension disbursal administration are more inclined to deny benefits and the top rung just follow those notings in toto. The result: cases being contested for years. There are cases where benefits have been denied even after the intervention of the Chief of Army Staff.It was in 2014 that Maj Navdeep Singh came out with Maimed by the System, an anthology of real-life accounts of military personnel, veterans and kin who fought and even successfully claimed their rights from courts, but after decades and some even posthumously.One of the prominent stories in the book is that of Capt Manjinder Singh Bhinder, who lost his life in the 1997 Uphaar Cinema tragedy, but not before saving 150 lives. His wife and four-year-old son, too, died in the fire. His parents were denied pension benefits on the ground of “death not attributable to military service”. A soldier is expected to respond to emergency situations even on leave, and he had died doing so. His parents had to approach Delhi High Court, which not only restored pension benefits, but also his honour.Another story is that of Gunner Bachan Singh from Ropar, whose pension was restored after battling for 59 years. While serving in Libya, he got injured after a shell fell on the vehicle he was travelling in. He lost function of his right hand. The British Crown retained him in service despite his disability, but India, after gaining independence, sent him back in November 1947. The military accounts branch discontinued his pension in 1949 on the ground that his disability was under 20 per cent,  while it actually was 30 per cent.In the mid-2000s, a letter on the case written to Lt Gen S Pattabhiraman, the then Army Commander, Western Command (he later rose to Vice-Chief of the Army Staff), elicited personal action by the General. Bachan Singh’s medical examination was conducted in 2005 and finally, in 2008, he got his pension back with arrears. He died the same year.Seventeen such stories have been narrated in the book. The corridors of courts are replete with such tales where soldiers have been ‘crippled’ by the military administration, but no one to tell them.In contrast, the West has produced many a literary work on the plight of their soldiers. John M Kinder’s Paying With Their Bodies is about an Iraq War veteran who lost his legs in a bomb attack. It questions a nation’s obligations to those who fight in its name. Audra Jennings’s Out of the Horrors of War: Disability Politics in World War II America shows how “disability is not merely  ‘another’ analytic category for historical analysis, but a crucial part of US political and policy history”. Sam Gaylord’s memoir, Then I Came Home, says the US government did not support its troops in the Vietnam War and has not paid heed to its combat veterans. 


ARTRAC chief Soni relinquishes charge

ARTRAC chief Soni relinquishes charge
Lt Gen DR Soni

Tribune News Service

Shimla, November 30

Lt Gen DR Soni today relinquished the charge of the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Army Training Command (ARTRAC).Lt Gen Soni will take over as General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Southern Command tomorrow. He is known for his out-of-the-box thinking and has been a staunch proponent of transformation in the Army based on innovative approaches and exploitation of the latest technologies.During his stint here, he addressed a wide spectrum of core issues. He was instrumental in evolving fresh concepts and doctrines as per the changing strategic milieu. He energised the ARTRAC with the renewed focus on operational-oriented training, leadership skills, assimilation of modern technological tools and accentuated inculcation of “killer instinct” during training.Through his endeavour, he helped in transforming the training establishments across the country as centres of excellence.

 


Rajouri attack: Lance Naik cremated in Talwandi Sabo

Rajouri attack: Lance Naik cremated in Talwandi Sabo
Bidding adieu: Surinder Pal Singh, SP, pays tributes to Lance Naik Kuldip Singh at Koreana village in Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda, on Monday. Tribune photo

Nikhila Pant Dhawan

Tribune News Service

Bathinda, December 25

Lance Naik Kuldip Singh (31), who was killed in the Rajouri sector of Jammu and Kashmir by Pakistan forces along with three others in an ambush two days ago, was today cremated with state honours at his native village, Koreana, in Talwandi Sabo.Kuldip had joined the Army in 2005 and is survived by his ailing mother, wife Jaspreet Kaur and two children.Earlier during the day, Lieutenant General PC Thimmaya, General Officer Commanding, Chetak Corps, paid homage to the martyr at a solemn ceremony by laying a wreath on behalf of all ranks of the Chetak Corps at the Bathinda Cantonment. The mortal remains of the martyr were, thereafter, taken to his village.A large gathering, including a number of Army and civil administration officials, had congregated at the village to pay homage to the soldier. The last rites of Lance Naik Kuldip Singh were performed with full military honours.Bathinda Deputy Commissioner Diprava Lakra said the kin of the martyr would be given Rs 5 lakh, his parents would be given Rs 2 lakh and another Rs 5 lakh financial help would be extended to his family.He also assured that a family member of the martyr would be given a government job. Also present during the cremation were Senior Superintendent of Police Naveen Singla and Talwandi Sabo Sub-Divisional Magistrate Varinder Kumar.


Army Major, 3 soldiers killed in Pak firing along LoC

Army Major, 3 soldiers killed in Pak firing along LoC
Photo for representation only.

Tribune News Service

Rajouri/Jammu, December 23

A Major and three soldiers of the Indian Army were killed in ceasefire violation by Pakistani troops in Keri sector along the Line of Control in Rajouri district on Saturday evening.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)”We suffered three fatal casualties including one officer in the incident. Major Moharkar Prafulla Ambadas, Lance Naik Gurmail Singh and Sepoy Pargat Singh were grievously injured during the ceasefire violation and succumbed to their injuries. Two other personnel also sustained injuries and are undergoing treatment,” a defence spokesman said.Defence sources, however, said four Army personnel were killed in the “unprovoked” firing.The latest violation of the ceasefire agreement took place at a time when Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti was camping in Rajouri district headquarters to address people’s grievances, they said.The defence spokesman said Pakistani troops targeted the Army patrol at Brat Galla in Keri sector at around 1215 hours.The Army, in a statement, said that Indian troops retaliated “strongly and effectively”.Jammu and Kashmir Deputy Chief Minister Nirmal Singh paid rich tributes to the slain soldiers and condemned Pakistan for the ceasefire violation.”Pakistan is indulging in such cowardly actions and is being given a befitting response, but it does not desist from such cowardly acts,” Singh told reporters on the sidelines of a function here.Major Ambadas (32) belonged to Bhandara district in Maharashtra and is survived by wife Avoli Moharkar, while Lance Naik Gurmail Singh (34) belonged to Amritsar district in Punjab and is survived by wife Kuljit Kaur and a daughter.Sepoy Pargat Singh (30) belonged to Karnal district in Haryana and is survived by wife Ramanpreet Kaur and a son, the Army said.“Major Ambadas, Lance Naik Gurmail and Sepoy Pargat were brave and sincere soldiers. The nation will always remain indebted to them for their supreme sacrifice and devotion to duty,” the Army statement said.The deputy chief minister said Pakistan has got isolated at the global stage, especially on the issue of terrorism.”Pakistan is a terrorist state and it will not be too long before the country is declared a terrorist state by the world. It does not only support terrorism but also provide state sponsorship,” Singh said. — PTI


The Year Ends: Not So Good For the Indian Army by Lt General VIJAY OBEROI

he Citizen Ends 2017 with insights from eminent persons, columnists and reporters

 2017 started on a somewhat controversial note when General Bipin Rawat assumed command of the Indian Army, superseding two army commanders senior to him. Considerable discussion followed, as barring exceptions, the government usually stayed on the straight and narrow path of seniority. While the government tried to give many excuses for this double supersession, there was considerable scepticism in the media, including social media.

Army Day rolled by on 15 Jan and the PM graciously tweeted: “We remember with great pride all the sacrifices made by our Army. They put their lives at risk so that 125 crore Indians live peacefully.” However, a couple of months later his government swooped down on a peaceful gathering of protesting veterans demanding removal of anomalies of OROP! So, was it a genuine ‘shabash’ or another ‘jumla’?!

The present government seems to like juggling Defence Ministers! In three years we have had four, including one incumbent twice, but in name only, as his first charge was the Ministry of Finance. Manohar Parrikar, after taking over on 09 Nov 14 remained in office for just about two years and returned to Goa-his state. Arun Jaitley became a caretaker defence minister again for about six months, thus completing nearly one wasted year for an important ministry!

Manohar Parrikar, despite being a lightweight in his party, tried to learn the ropes of the Ministry and bring badly needed changes, but could not get the better of entrenched MoD bureaucrats. He could neither satisfy the veterans fully in their long-standing demand of OROP, nor the serving personnel as there was no progress in the much-needed modernisation of the armed forces. He could not resolve anomalies in pay and allowances either. He fell into the bureaucrat trap of setting a host of committees, whose recommendations are mostly languishing in the MoD cupboards. These include the Reddy Committee for OROP anomalies, Promotion Policy Committee and many others. Even the high –powered Shekatkar Committee’s recommendations have been only partially accepted, while the real hard-nosed ones have been quietly buried.

During 2017, the social media was hyperactive on defence issues, To obviate grievances being aired by soldiers on social media, the Army Chief instructed all formations to have a grievance box placed where aggrieved personnel could drop their grievances. This move drew adverse reactions, as the army has always had a highly elaborate and fair system of dealing with grievances.

The end of severe winter coincided with an upsurge in violence in the Valley. The state government was visibly helpless and was more concerned with the upcoming elections in Srinagar and Anantnag. The police and CAPF also had their constraints and failed to take strong action. It was left to the army to contain the local violence as well as neutralise insurgents.

In mid April, the so-called ‘human shield’ episode occupied the media for weeks, if not months. It was actually an innovative and spur of the moment action by a junior army officer for saving personnel on election duty from a mob bent on assaulting, if not killing them. It did not deserve the kind of publicity it received!

Around the same time, a young Kashmiri officer of the army, Lt Ummer Fayaz Parry was abducted and brutally killed by militants in Shopian district, while he was visiting his village, on leave, to attend a wedding. The media; state government; and the Human Rights Groups hardly took cognisance of this brutal act; proving the one-sided reality of violence in Kashmir!

In J&K, Operation Sadbhavna of the army continued to be a resounding success. In a situation where the state government does nothing to provide good governance, it is only Sadhvana that brings hope and succour to the people. Its effect on the hearts and minds of the people is starkly visible when thousands of Kashmiri youth come for the army’s recruitment rallies.

2017 was another wasted year for joint endeavours by the three services, despite the army pushing for it. The Air Force continues to be highly obdurate, without any cogent reasons; the bureaucracy is loath to give up its current role of being the virtual joint headquarters; and the political leadership is blasé, as it has only elections and vote banks on its mind. Consequently, a CDS and joint structures continue to be a major weakness at all levels.

In May, a border action team (BAT) of Pakistan Army had crossed the LC in the Krishna Ghati Sector and mutilated bodies of two personnel. The brutality of the act drew severe criticism from the international community. Since the Indian Army does not indulge in such brutalities, it responded in its own time and in different areas and avenged the action.

India’s unresolved territorial disputes with both China and Pakistan continued unabated during 2017. Along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China, a major standoff that lasted over 72 days in the Doka La area, near the southern tip of the Chumbi Valley, was handled with aplomb by the Indian Army, especially as it had major politico-diplomatic-military facets, as a third country-Bhutan was also involved.

In J&K, the Line of Control (LC) ostensibly under a mutually agreed cease fire for nearly two decades remained active on account of Pakistan continuing to infiltrate Jihadi insurgents and terrorists across it. Deployment of army continues in the north-eastern states too.

Thus, instead of reduction of operational tasks, the army keeps getting deeper in both the morass of counter insurgency operations and border defence at the same time. Although Indian Army soldiers are well trained; well led; and are physically and mentally tough, these repetitive tasks are taking their toll and do affect morale adversely. The political leadership seems to have no plans to change this situation by other means, although the strength of all types of police forces; administrators; and subordinate staff; keep increasing, as do their pay and allowances, while the army plods on with antiquated equipment, reduced emoluments and ever-increasing tasks.

Despite its high numerical strength, the Indian Army continues to be a hollow army. Consequently, its’ ability to undertake various types of military operations on the modern battlefield stands greatly reduced. There are three major reasons for this state of affairs. The first is the abysmally low defence budget that has been dwindling every year and now stands reduced to just 1.5 percent of the GDP. The second is our complicated procurement procedures. Despite eight Defence Procurement Plans (DPP’s) having been issued in nine years, there is no change in the situation.

The third reason is that while ‘Make in India’ policy of the PM resonates in discussions; media reports; committees; election ‘bhashans’, and the like, precious little action is visible on the ground. The PSUs carry on in their lethargic ways as in the past; the DRDO has produced little that could be called satisfactory by the users, despite huge time delays and cost overruns.

The army’s shortages of weapons and equipment keep mounting. In broad terms, bulk of its weapons and equipment are either in an obsolescence or obsolete state. As an example, the largest army, the infantry that is the backbone of counter insurgency operations as well as for fighting battles and wars, has no modern weapons and equipment. All Arms and Corps are in a similar state. Reserves of ammunition of all types are also at a record low.

Despite the above, talk of wars on two fronts and even two and a half fronts have been articulated by highly senior persons, who should know better!

A most peculiar order was passed within a few days of the new Defence Minister taking over (the fourth change in three years of the present government!). The army was ordered to clear garbage left by tourists. While the army hierarchy, acting as the proverbial sacrificial lambs, meekly accepted it, there was furore among the veterans and in the social media. They rightly stated that at no given moment should the country’s military be deployed to tackle something as opposite to their line of duties as garbage collection. Why are local civil government institutions/officials shirking their responsibility?

A month or so later, the Defence Minister again tasked the army on a non-military task, to construct four foot bridges across local train lines in Mumbai, when elaborate and better expertise is available with the Railways and it is their job. It was a political move to bail out both the Railways and the BJP-led government in Maharashtra, who were twiddling their thumbs after an accident on a pedestrian bridge. It is a mystery why the army accepted it!

There has been an inconclusive debate on the selection system currently prevailing for officers of flag ranks. Although the selection system for promotions in the army is as fair and comprehensive as is possible, yet aberrations came in when promotions based strictly on command vacancies falling vacant for a particular batch were changed/tweaked for extraneous reasons. There is a move now to cut out the anomalies, but a formal decision is yet to be taken.

As the year was approaching its end, two important announcements were made, but the media reported only one. The planned upgradation of rank structures of nearly 1.5 lakh JCO’s and Jawans over the next five years was well received. Essentially, it is a cadre review, which was last carried out in 1984. While benefiting individuals, it has some negative connotations too. Cadre reviews only succeed when additional slots are created within and outside the army, otherwise there will be severe command and control problems on the one hand and stagnation in different ranks at different times.

The second decision was the declaration of 2018 as the ‘Year of the War Disabled’ by the Army Chief. The proposal for this was mooted by this writer at a War Disabled Personnel Rally at Pune in May this year, in his capacity as the President of the War Wounded Foundation, an NGO functioning for all war disabled personnel of the army, navy and air force. Maybe the media is waiting for a formal announcement!

The induction of women in the ranks, initially in the Corps of Military Police (CMP) came in for a lot of criticism, as it was rightly read as a political sop and not needed for a country that has hordes of male volunteers waiting to be recruited. This move is also likely to create adverse management problems, without any tangible gains.

An event widely reported in some sections of the media was the first Military Literature Festival (MILFEST) of the nation held at Chandigarh. It was a joint venture between the State of Punjab and Headquarters Western Command. Both the Governor and Chief Minister of Punjab were fully involved in its planning and execution. The LITFEST proper was preceded by many army teams performing and showing their skills, much to the delight of the people of Chandigarh and nearby cities. Besides highlighting wars fought by the armed forces; lessons learnt; individual accounts; military history of Punjab and so on; the LITFEST proved that ‘Military Literature’ is not an oxymoron’!

The bottom line is that no real change has taken place in the army in 2017. However, because of efforts of the army and not the government, there is better appreciation of the army and the tasks it performs for the nation. There is a definite need to reduce tasking of the army on internal tasks, so that they get adequate time to train for their primary task and also have a better quality of life.

As India rises in stature economically and technologically towards a more eminent position in the region and the world, it has to concurrently build on its military power. The political leadership must take this issue seriously, lest the country is found napping when ‘push comes to a shove’!

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/4/12573/The-Year-Ends-Not-So-Good-For-The-Indian-Army

(Lt General Vijay Oberoi is a former Vice Chief of the Army Staff)

clip


Cockiness alone won’t do by Sandeep Dikshit

Cockiness alone won’t do
GO EASY: The testosterone-infused narrative is shaping public perception.

Sandeep Dikshit

LAST week, India commissioned a new submarine after 17 years. This was yet another opportunity for some joyful, vigorous back-slapping in the national security crowd. Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman all but made PM Modi the star of the show till social media informed her that most of the project spanned the tenure of the UPA government.Yet, the breaking of waters by the solitary, though strikingly deadly submarine, was made out as a watershed event in India’s march at military muscle-building. There was little word about the existing capability — down to 13 undersea vessels and less than half operational at any given time and in no match to China’s 50-plus submarine fleet.National security is admittedly a sensitive subject and involves some self-censorship. But not a single commentary dwelt on the severely compromised characteristics of the submarine after the last September leak of 22,000 pages of its sensitive operational data. Veteran submariners say a submarine becomes naked and exposed if the enemy captures its distinctive noise, heat and electro-magnetic emissions. Did the government apply correctives as it had promised? Were they adequate? If the embarrassing exposure of all its operational characteristics had been modified, why is there no follow-up order on three more submarines?The might of the Indian Navy has become something of a myth, especially in the undersea. Neither are there adequate submarines nor deep-sea rescue vessels to extricate our submariners if one of the undersea boats packs up. India is reportedly entering the nuclear era of submarines but its sole Russia-leased nuclear boat is in the dock after busting its sonar panels, its eyes in the murky sea.Yet there is tall talk about how a brave India is plunging into uncharted waters in concert with the US, Japan and Australia to counter an aggressive and abrasive China, keen on dominating its peripheral oceans.Forget the compromising of operational data of the submarine, the cyberspace is surprisingly silent on the results of the probe the French government had promised; the issue is why each submarine is Rs 1,000 crore more expensive and if there was any penalty for the five-year delay in its launch.Instead, the Indian security establishment and its cheerleaders have happily moved on to the next major cherry on the defence acquisition calendar — a $8 billion project for more submarines. There will be another new acquisition-related excitement this month — the purchase of anti-missile missiles from Russia. Each battery will come packed in its original crate and there is not even a token technology transfer envisaged in this multibillion dollar deal. But there will be another round of jubilation over India joining an exclusive club of countries with a missile defence shield. No questions will be asked about the fate of DRDO’s several tests of our own missile defence shield or the worth of the late Missile Man’s claim of having made India self-sufficient in defence.If this vigorous flagging of India’s military muscle was intended to impress the neighbours, three developments last week should dampen our exuberance. The Foreign Office was compelled to issue two thinly veiled warnings. Sri Lanka was testily asked to keep India’s security concerns in mind: an allusion to the 99-year lease to China of the Hambantota port juxtaposed with Colombo’s procrastination on an Indian request for the same favour for the Trincomalee port.The Maldives was the next to get the rap. It seems no longer ready to adhere to the “India First” dictum,  especially when the largest number of tourists bankrolling its economy are from China. It largely operates India-gifted military hardware and is networked in the Indian Naval surveillance system. Yet India was uninformed when its Majlis approved an FTA with China. Worse, the Maldives is now viewing the Indian ambassador from the same lens used by PM Modi for the Manmohan Singh-Mahmud Kasuri dinner meeting. It suspended three employees for a conversation with the Indian envoy in Mali.The third setback has happened in Nepal where the election results from the mountains, its political heartland, have brought a new elite to the fore that is under no past obligation to the Indian security managers or the RSS cadre that had worked together in vain to refashion social equations in the Nepalese Parliament.The absence of criticism, scepticism and constant questioning in national security debates has left the common citizen uninformed about India’s true place in the global constellation of nations.The Kargil War was one where the national security apparatus was tested and found wanting. The 1962 War was an earlier occasion for meticulous self-examination of the state of our military responses. Both led to salutary changes in the way we conduct our defence affairs as well as a reappraisal of the alternative tools of persuasion and dissuasion at our disposal.This faculty of introspection; of ascertaining where we truly stand is now in a short supply. This inhibits not just an honest appraisal but stunts our problem-solving abilities and prevents a sincere appraisal of the future.Embarrassing developments are allowed to fade, unquestioned. December is the Russian season, when there is a flurry of high-level meetings in the run-up to the annual summit. But there has been no examination of the impact on Moscow’s psyche about an alleged hush-hush tour by either the Americans or the British to examine a sophisticated submarine leased to India.Of course, India does not have a parade ground Army. Neither are its armed forces predominantly symbolic. It is as lethal and responsive as the best in the game. But the incessant talking up of the armed forces — there is no let-up in the celebrations of the surgical strikes — while dissuading the public scrutiny of its warts does the cause of nation-building a disservice and shields the security managers from being called out for their bloopers.  The testosterone-infused narrative is shaping public perception: Talks with Pakistan are disfavoured; Nepal can be brought to heel with a few spies and RSS cadre; frequent invocation of the Buddhist link will keep Sri Lanka in good humour; and, regime change in the Maldives will resolve all issues. All these easy-fixes are conceived under the misplaced assumption of a massive Indian military umbrella that has the others, presumably, impressed and in awe.India lives in a tough neighbourhood and it makes sense to remind the more adventure prone about its military muscle. But the macho man needs to take a back seat occasionally. An occasional, if spectacular, military operation also does not stir this tough neighbourhood.  

sandeep4731@gmail.com