Sanjha Morcha

Defence ministry gives better cover for LoC jawan families, benefits set to increase

Liberalised pension plan will support wounded or deceased soldier’s family in a better way than existing pension schemes. Will this bring relief to army personnel demanding OROP?

 

Defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman has taken a decision which is likely to benefit border troops and their families. The first full time female defence minister of India has decided to give liberalised family pension to army personnel working on the Line of Control (LoC) or international border along Pakistan.

The liberalised family pension covers accidental death or sustained injury due to natural calamities such as floods, avalanches, landslides, cyclone, fire and lightening or drowning in river while performing operational duties. It also covers death or injury sustained during movement against enemy forces and armed hostilities in operational area.

The liberalised family pension provides for 100 per cent of last permissible emoluments in comparison to normal family pension which provides for 30 per cent of the last permissible emoluments.

The defence minister has approved that the same benefit of liberalised family pension be extended to army personnel deployed along Line of Actual Control (LAC) along India-China border.

Pension has been a hot topic among the armed forces. Army personnel have been demanding ‘One Rank One Pension’ (OROP) for many years. Still disparity exists in the pensions of army personnel even they are of the same rank. There was a major agitation by the army personnel in 2016 for the demand of One rank One Pension. Defence minister’s latest move might allay the fears of large section of soldiers and senior army officials.


Submit proposal for 83 more Tejas, HAL told

Submit proposal for 83 more Tejas, HAL told

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, December 20

The Indian Air Force has formally asked the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to submit its proposal for making 83 additional Tejas fighter jets.Of these, 73 will be the upgraded version called the ‘Mark-1A’ and 10 will be the trainer version — a twin seat version — that will be as per specifications allowed in the variant approved for existing final operational clearance (FOC).The HAL, which will submit its proposal within 90 days (by March next year), is already making 40 Tejas jets as per the FOC standards set by the IAF.At present pace, the Mark-1A could be ready for first flight by 2019. The Tribune had first reported in its edition dated November 14 as to how the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was clearing the hurdles to the project and was more interested in ‘Make in India’ project of the light combat aircraft, Tejas.On November 7 last year, the Defence Acquisition Council, chaired by then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, approved the procurement of 83 planes of the ‘Mark-1A’ version. But a formal order is yet to be placed.It was almost two years ago, in December 2015, that the IAF indicated the requirement of 100 Tejas LCA MK-1A aircraft, for which a formal order is yet to be placed. The plan of manufacturing and completion is from 2018 to 2022-23. The seeking of proposal from HAL, an MoD owned public sector undertaking, is the first step towards getting these jets.There are 123 Tejas jets — in two variants — that the MoD is looking at. Forty planes of the base version have been ordered and are under production. The Mark-1A version will have 43 upgrades over the base version.The IAF wants an AESA radar, in place of the manually scanned Israeli Elta radar. Besides, it wants a ‘self-protection jammer’ fitted with external re-fuelling capability. The MoD has Rs1,331-crore plan to double the existing eight planes per annum capacity of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited.Japan to hold anti-piracy drill with India

  • Japan Coast Guard (JCG) will conduct separate anti-piracy exercises with India and Malaysia, the latter one notably at a port in the disputed South China Sea
  • JCG will dispatch its ship ‘Tsugaru’ to Chennai while its delegation will meet Indian Coast Guard officials before the joint counter-piracy exercise off Chennai on January 19

Hope fades for 5 soldiers

Hope fades  for 5 soldiers
Photo for representation only.

Srinagar, December 14

Even as efforts to trace the five missing soldiers continue more than 48 hours after they were buried under snow in north Kashmir, there is little hope of their being found alive.In two separate incidents on Tuesday when the Valley’s upper reaches witnessed heavy snowfall, two soldiers slipped down a slope in Nowgam sector of Kupwara district while three went missing from a forward post in Kanzalwan Gurez along the Line of Control in Bandipora.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)The Army has deployed avalanche rescue and High-Altitude Warfare School (HAWS) teams. “The search is on but they have not been traced,” a defence official said. — TNS


Animals are unsung heroes of history’

Personalities are important, but we forget the animals associated with them. COLONEL HARDEEP SINGH

CHANDIGARH :“Do you remember the name of the horse who fought alongside Napoleon?” asked Colonel Hardeep Singh, speaking at a session on ‘Military animals: The unsung heroes’ during the Military Literature Festival, here on Saturday.

“Personalities are important, but we forget the animals associated with them,” he said.

While military animals fought on the battlefield and risked their lives for different countries, their bravery has not been documented as that of their human counterparts. Lt Gen Baljit Singh, a panellists on the session rued that canine soldiers in India have not been given their due credit. One of the heroes that he talked about was Bobbie, a mongrel with the Berkshire Regiment. He guarded the regiment and accompanied his handler Lance Sgt Peter Kelly onto the battlefield in Afghanistan in 1880.

“During the war, the British force was overrun by the Afghans, and over half of the regiment was killed. Bobbie kept barking furiously and also sustained serious injuries. He, however, survived along with a few other soldiers. When he returned to England, he was presented to Queen Victoria, who bent down and pinned the Afghan medal on his collar,” Lt Gen said. Bobbie now remains stuffed at the regimental museum in Salisbury, decorated with the medal.

DOG WHO SAVED SOLDIER’S LIFE

Lt Gen Singh also narrated an account from Brig Darshan Khullar’s (retd) book ‘When Generals Failed’ of an Indian dog who saved a grievously injured soldier. The dog kept on barking after seeing a party, constantly peeped inside a hut and run around it to attract its attention. Upon checking, the team found an emaciated jawan, who came crawling out on his arms.

The jawan later told the officer that he had survived six days on the crumbs brought to him by his canine friend.

Lt Gen Singh emphasised that the valour of canine heroes should be recognised and tales of their bravery told like that of their human counterparts.


Social media is to stay, forces need to use it constructively’

CHANDIGARH: Discussing the challenges posed to the military by the increasing use of social media, panellists agreed that social media per se is not bad and can be used said that effectively in solving many problems.

SANJEEV SHARMA/HT■ (From left) Col Avnish Sharma, Col Ajai Shukla, Maj Navdeep Singh, journalists Ambreen Zaidi and Suman Sharma and student activist Gurmehar Kaur at a session on social media.Colonel Avnish Sharma (retd) said the responsibility lies with military personnel in conducting themselves to because transparency has increased manifolds in the age of social media.

“Civilians see us as an organisation which lives up to the principles of discipline, honesty, secularism and devotion to duty.”

Also in the panel was Gurmehar Kaur who was trolled online for her views on Indo-Pak relations. “The military belongs to the country and polarisation inside it has to be resisted. The propaganda on social media about one or the other party has to be resisted so that saffronisation of military can be stopped.”

Adding to the discussion, Colonel Ajai Shukla (retd), said, “Social media does provide challenge because the security dynamics is involved,” adding that the United States of America has a handbook for the military on the use of social media. “We need to address the lack of understanding,” he said.

Recounting her experience, Ambreen Zaidi, a journalist, said she and her husband were refused rented accommodation in New Delhi because they are Muslims.

She then raised the matter on Twitter and that was the first occasion when the couple’s religion was seen to be more important than the fact they are an army family.

“I was trolled on the social media, given death and rape threats but I wasn’t intimidated. They then started reaching out to my children and I was afraid for a while. However, it all settled down after some time and I started replying to the trolls in a way that hurt them the most,” she said.

Suman Sharma, a journalist, added to what Col Sharma point and said that the social media is here to stay. “It can become a force multiplier if used in a positive way. It is increasing accountability and keeps officers in check.”


’65 war with Pak was a draw: Capt

’65 war with Pak was a draw: Capt
Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh speaks at the Military Literature Festival in Chandigarh on Friday. TRIBUNE PHOTO: RAVI KUMAR

Bhartesh Singh Thakur

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, December 8

“As far as 1965 war is concerned, we made little territorial gains. Pakistan occupied some area in Kutch and we made some gains in north Punjab. It was a draw. We didn’t have ammunition to last beyond a week. After that we would have been throwing stones at each other. It was even,” said Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh at the Military Lit Fest today.He was replying to a question in a session with military historians on whether India won the 1965 war with Pakistan. Islamabad claims victory in the war and commemorates it as defence day every September 6.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)However, Lt Gen TS Shergill, who was also part of the session, said the Indian military did not allow Pakistan to achieve its war objectives. “India secured Kashmir and destroyed their war machines, which they acquired from the US. India didn’t allow them to acquire any territory. They wanted to reach up to the Beas,” he said and described the war as victory for India.On not making the Henderson-Brooks report on the Indo-China 1962 war public, Capt Amarinder said: “The Henderson-Brooks report is being hidden to save political skin. It is a bad decision.”Commenting on India’s forward policy that led to war with China, he added: “We provoked Chinese. Forward policy was wrong. What was the system? Then defence minister Krishna Menon was shifting battalions. Corps Commander was just obeying orders… 4 Div was building houses in Ambala before going for the war. They didn’t have training. It was unfortunate.”On writing military history, the Punjab CM said when he wrote about the battle of Rezang La, which took place during the Indo-China war in 1962, he took seven survivors to the actual battlefield and asked them to narrate the story. “I asked them to take their positions and narrate about it. Different version came out… I even took my 2 Sikh to Poonch… History has a habit of changing. Things are added by interested parties.”Capt Amarinder has authored seven books on military history so far.


Apolitical armed forces Introspection best behind closed doors

Apolitical armed forces

The Army chief Gen. Bipin Rawat came out with yet another surprising formulation at a public interaction organised by an Army backed think-tank. In less than a year since taking over as the Army chief, the general has proven to be more garrulous than probably all his predecessors combined. Besides talking up the surgical strikes in Pakistan, which of course was a done thing for the Army after South Block took public ownership of a cross-border operation in peace time for the first time, several of the Army chief’s statements have been on the razor’s edge where detached professionalism acquires hues of partisanship towards the ruling arrangement. These include the L’affaire Human Shield in Kashmir, lending the army for Yoga Day and acknowledging an Army incursion into Myanmar to neutralise militants.These were evidently made-for-TV moments and went against the considered past practice of maintaining ambiguity and preserving the army’s options. But what the army chief said this time was the right opposite: he spoke of politicisation of the armed forces and hoped the military “should be somehow” kept away from politics. If this is what an Army chief feels in public, then there is something amiss. The principal professional obligation of a service chief is to ensure his force remains resolutely non-political and is steeped in conformity with constitutional principles. That is something that the founders of our republic had ensured while formatting the power arrangement of independent India. What exactly was the Army chief trying to convey? General Rawat has so far walked a fine balance: his observations on Myanmar, surgical strikes and human shield have suited the ruling arrangement’s political preferences; but he has held his peace on the army being asked to maintain hygiene or being commandeered to construct railway over-bridges. The army may have aggregated a few blemishes for pulling out the politicians’ chestnuts out of the fire by endless deployment for internal security operations, but in the main, it has a stellar record of causing minimum collateral damage and discomfort to the civilian population. If the Army chief was rankled by internal conversations, he should have opted to convey his impressions to his crowd under Chatham House rules.


Central Asia goes Islamist by Lt Gen Bhopinder Singh,

In the middle of Asia are the five former Soviet republics, suffixed with the Persian word ‘Stan’ (meaning ‘land of’) attached to their ethnic identities, that is, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and then the sixth, Afghanistan (though it was never part of the Soviet confederation). This historical crossroads of global cultures, religions and ideas was the confluence region of the famed Silk Road, which bore the famous Mughal dynasty that ruled the Indian sub-continent.

However, the cultural identity of Central Asia got suppressed under the national project of Sovietisation that disabled perceived elements of religiosity in a quest to promote collectivisation and a ‘proletarian culture’. The ethnic minorities and their innate diversities got increasingly engendered and subsumed in the Russian language and cultural sensibilities, ostensibly as a form of ‘modernisation’.

The dormant impulses of the region found instinctive expression, asserting themselves, in the implosion of the USSR in 1991, and the five Central Asian Republics (CARs) were born. Soon, the reigns passed from Moscow, to its erstwhile party apparatchiks and regional strongmen, who have since maintained relative stability (barring the Tajik civil war of 1992 to 1997), albeit whilst following dictatorial means and methods. Continued life-sustaining aid and invaluable investments from Moscow have also ensured the relatively peaceful relationship of the new republics and Russia, with the forceful retention of officially-mandated ‘Secularism’.

The inherent but dormant sense of Islamic identity was soon fanned and instigated, however, by generous doles from the Saudi Arabian coffers that ensured rapid shipments of religious texts, construction and renovation of mosques and an overall infusion of the alien Salafist strain. Suddenly, the principal fear for the newly independent states of the region was, ironically, religion.

As the bloody Tajik civil war pitted the ‘Islamic Renaissance Party’ as the principal opposition, and in neighbouring Afghanistan, the Taliban took control, repression and persecution of the newly emerging and hardline Islamic groups, intensified. Endemic poverty, suffocation of democratic rights and religious intolerance have combined with easy access to online information to radicalise the hungry stomachs of the region, who look upon religion as the logical salvation. Unsurprisingly, an estimated 2,000 to 4,000 people from the region are believed to have joined Islamic State in the Syrian-Iraqi swathes, and some others in the equally restive Afghanistan-Pakistan region.

The footprints of the radicalised Central Asian diaspora are now emerging in the diverse terror attacks in Kunduz, Stockholm, Istanbul, St Petersburg to, most recently, in New York.

Terror from these lands publicly emerged on US soil on April 15, 2013, when two homemade bombs at the annual Boston Marathon killed three people and injured several others – two Kyrgyz-American brothers Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, were found guilty. Immediately, the West woke up to the intricacies and diversities of Islamist terror from the erstwhile-USSR, beyond the Chechen insurgency.

More recently, inspired by the IS playbook, Sayfullo Saipov, an Uzbek immigrant, drove his rented truck over cyclists and pedestrians in New York, killing eight people. These are not isolated examples of radicalisation, as terror organisations like the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Islamic Movement of Central Asia and Hizb ut-Tahrir have been active in the region for over a decade.

An interesting trend of radicalisation of immigrants from Central Asia on foreign soils can be attributed to the usual sense of disenfranchisement and inability to ‘fit-in’ with the local milieu socially, culturally and financially. This is conveniently tapped into by the ideologues of the regressive and absolutist religious organisations. It is estimated that 85-90% of IS fighters from the CARs were radicalised and recruited when they were in Russia on work!

Similarly, the Stockholm terror attack suspect was a rejected asylum seeker from Uzbekistan, who is also said to have encouraged his friends to join IS. Clearly, the specific targeting of the CARs by the likes of IS, by customising their literatures, manuals and inspirational materials into the vernacular languages, is paying dividends, and the relative obscurity of the region in the global imagination is turning into a recognition of it beyond its much-publicised energy reserves.

Whispers of extending the US Executive Order 1376 (‘Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States’, commonly called the ‘Muslim ban’) beyond Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen have started to include the CARs.

Religion, the unifier

The region’s desperate economic conditions, glaring disparities and the authoritarian governments are engaged in simplistic counter-terrorism, as opposed to preventing it. Strongmen like Kazakhastan’s Nursultan Nazarbayev, Tajikistan’s Emomali Rakhmon and, till very recently, Uzbekistan’s Islam Karimov have brutally muzzled all dissent, centralised the control levers and unintentionally stirred up public resistance by publishing high official approval ratings that run contrary to the sentiment on the street (for instance, the referendum aimed at perpetuating the Rakhmon regime in Tajikistan by aiding his son was passed by ‘95% of the population’, when only ‘92% voter turnout’ was recorded!).

In this region, the dominant strain of Islam is the Sunni Hanafi (with a sprinkling of Shia Ismailis and Imamis), who are essentially localised and more ‘cultural’ in essence, than puritanical or supremacist. But beyond poverty, it is religion that has become the common denominator that unites the mainstream to come under a common platform against the ruling autocrats.

Thus political integration, engagement and inclusivity is a must, as indeed developing a more equitable society wherein the obvious wealth of the land can be shared, as opposed to the usurpation by the infamous oligarchs of the region. These CARs have already supported the ‘War on Terror’ by allowing air access and other strategic investments to the West (including a military hospital made by India at the Farkhor Air Base in Tajikistan). Yet, the lack of democracy and imbalanced economics are dangerously pushing these energy-rich havens into a familiar spiral of religious terror that prevails in the region’s underbelly of the Af-Pak and West Asian regions.

(The writer is former Lt Governor of Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Puducherry)


Three soldiers missing as avalanche hits forward post in J&K

Three soldiers missing as avalanche hits forward post in J&K
Photo for representation only.

Srinagar, December 12

Three soldiers were missing after an avalanche, triggered by fresh snow, struck a forward post in Gurez sector in Bandipora district of Jammu and Kashmir, police said on Tuesday.The avalanche hit an Army post at Baktoor near the Line of Control in Gurez sector during the intervening night, a police official said.He said at least three soldiers were reported missing after the avalanche.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

“Efforts are on to trace the missing soldiers but continuous snow was hampering the rescue and search efforts,” he added.An Army porter is missing since Monday after he came under an avalanche in Tulail in Gurez sector. PTI


The deep state reigns supreme in Pak

Pakistan’s deep state comprising its powerful army, intelligence agencies, notably the sinister ISI and the many terror ‘tanzeems’ it nurtures, called the shots as Pakistan was hit by a radical tornado led by Rizvi.

The deep state reigns supreme in Pak
Khadim Husain Rizvi. reuters

Lt-Gen Kamal Davar (retd)

History displays an immutable propensity of repeating itself in nations, institutions and organisations when some of its lessons continue to be discarded at the altar of political expediency or unenlightened self-interest. Neighbouring, restive Pakistan, despite its many abortive attempts with genuine democracy, fell once again on its knees to the unholy trinity of its ‘deep state’. Pakistan’s deep state comprising its all-powerful Army, its intelligence agencies notably the sinister ISI and the many terror ‘tanzeems’ it nurtures, called the shots as Pakistan was hit and near-paralysed, for nearly a month by a radical tornado triggered by a newly formed fundamentalist outfit, the Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah led by a Muslim cleric, Khadim Husain Rizvi, belonging to the Barelvi sect of Islam. That an elected government had to plead to its Army to restore law and order in the nation displayed for the ‘umpteenth’ time where power essentially rests in Pakistan and the unaccountability of the Pakistan army to its elected government. Provoked by a seemingly innocuous alteration in wording of the swearing-in for a Pakistani legislator, the radicals — whose number is alarmingly rising in Pakistan — termed the amendment as blasphemous and went into an overdrive, as they blockaded the Islamabad highway to Murree. Though there were hardly 3,000 protesters, they successfully choked road links around Islamabad and soon the protests spread to many parts of Pakistan. ‘Dharnas’, on the call of Rizvi were staged at Lahore, Peshawar, Faislabad, Sargodha and other towns and houses of some ministers torched. Over a dozen protesters were shot dead and around 255 injured as a result of the security forces firing at the agitators.The beleaguered PM Shahid Khaqan Abbasi asked Pakistan Army chief, Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa, to control the deteriorating situation. It can happen only in Pakistan that an army chief can refuse a legitimate order from his duly elected prime minister and get away scot-free! The wily general refused to take on the protesters but assured his PM that the army will ensure the security of governmental buildings and other sensitive installations. Importantly, the Pakistan Army played an important mediatory role in defusing the situation by persuading the Pakistan government to make the hapless Law Minister Zahid Hamid resign from his post as demanded by the extremist protesters. That the army’s sympathies rested with the radical elements on the streets tellingly revealed the contours of Pakistani politics likely to shape up soon. The timing of these protests, the release of the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist strike mastermind Hafiz Saeed, the waning of mainstream political parties and rise of radical forces portends an ugly future for Pakistan’s polity. Compounding the worsening milieu are efforts by former President General Pervez Musharraf to re-enter the political environment. His giving a clean chit and expressing his admiration for the terrorist kingpin Hafiz Saeed and the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jamaat-ul-Dawa, especially in their nefarious efforts in J&K, must be factored in by India’s security establishment. Is Hafiz Saeed’s efforts to “politically mainstream” his newly established Mili Muslim League, the emergence of other radical political outfits are a mere coincidence or has the Pakistani Army’s subtle nod to make Pakistan into a totally militarised Islamic state? The emerging scenario, with the general elections slated in 2018 thus is fraught with ominous tidings with regards to the deepening of collusive ties between the army and the extremist forces in Pakistan.India, as it continues with its established policies of non-interference in the internal politics of a neighbouring country, yet cannot remain indifferent to the happenings in Pakistan. The emerging Pakistan army and radical elements nexus is fraught with danger for India, even Afghanistan and the region. China, with its economic investments in Pakistan, will back Pakistan’s deep state for its strategic interests. Even the US, at least till its commitments in Afghanistan, will, admonish Pakistan to lay off terrorism in its neighbourhood but continue to reward it financially and militarily. India will have to chart its own path to ensure its security with enhanced preparedness while it gets Russia, Afghanistan and Iran to synergise their efforts to keep a rogue, nuclear-armed Pakistan in check. Thouogh radicalism among the common folk in Pakistan is on the ascendant, there still exists a sane civil society and some of its diaspora which India needs to address and encourage with a multi-faceted approach. Being the largest nation in South Asia, India’s responsibilities, naturally, go beyond its borders.