Sanjha Morcha

Indo-Kazakhstan joint exercise concludes

Indo-Kazakhstan joint exercise concludes
Slithering operation being conducted during the Indo-Kazakhstan Joint Training Exercise on Tuesday. Photo: Ashok Raina

Our Correspondent

Kangra, November 14

The Indo-Kazakhstan Joint Training Exercise, “Prabal Dostyk 2017” culminated today with a closing ceremony at the Bakloh Military Camp here.Col NN Joshi, Defence Spokesperson, today said the exercise was the second edition of the ‘Prabal Dostyk’ series of exercises between the two countries. He said the first was ‘Prabal Dostyk 2016, which was conducted in Kazakhstan.He said the 14-day joint training exercise included basic mutual orientation between contingents of the two armies, a joint training in counter insurgency/counter terrorist operations under the UN mandate and culminated with a validation exercise.Col Joshi said the overall aim of the joint exercise was to understand each other’s operational methodology and develop interoperability to enable joint operations by the two armies.Brigadier Navdeep Brar of the Indian Army presided over the closing ceremony. Besides the two participating contingents, the closing ceremony was also attended by observer delegations of both armies which comprised of senior ranking military officers. Personnel of both contingents expressed their satisfaction on the successful conduct of the joint exercise and were confident of having achieved a high degree of interoperability. The exercise also demonstrated the determination of the two armies in working closely with each other to eradicate the menace of terrorism in all its forms. The joint exercise was a resounding success and will go a long way in enhancing military ties between India and Kazakhstan, Col Joshi added.


Life Certificate

Many elderly pensioners find it difficult to carry out regular banking activity or giving Life certificate.
There are banks which provide home banking facility for elders and disabled. Please give a letter to your branch to ask for the facility.In any case by Dec 2017 as per RBI latest orders as per orders seen at

 https://www.labourlawnews.com/banking-facility-senior-citizens-differently-abled-persons/

For life certificate one need not go the home branch put can submit the life certificate as follows
Go to any one who has Jeevan Praman facility and submit. Some welfare NGO have done this.To find  facility go to

https://jeevanpramaan.gov.in/locater

Electronic Delivery of Certificate :The Life Certificates can also be electronically delivered to the Pension Disbursing Agency, without any manual intervention.
Get your life certificate signed by any of the following officials and submit to the nearest branch of your bank and get a receipt for the same.
Officers Authorized to sign Life Certificates
Life certificates issued/signed by one or other of the following authorities/persons can be accepted:-
A serving or pensioned person exercising the powers of a Magistrate under the criminal procedure code (Act-V of 1898).
A registrar or sub-registrar appointed under the Indian Registration Act 1908 (XVI of 1908).
A Gazetted Officer.
A Munsif.
A police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector incharge of Police station.
Master, a Departmental Sub-Post Master or an Inspector of Post Office.
Officers of the Reserve Bank of India and other PSBs in respect of pensioners drawing pension from Banks.
The head of the village Panchayat, Gram Panchayat or Head of an executive committee of a village.
Retired Commissioned Officers of the Armed Forces in respect of pension bill form IAFA-319 of Commissioned Officers, departmental Officers and Warrant Officers.

BRO opens Rohtang-Lahaul road After snowfall, 46 were stranded in Koksar I Vehicles to be allowed in emergency cases

BRO opens Rohtang-Lahaul road
The snow -clearing operation in full swing on the Manali-Rohtang-Keylong highway on Wednesday. Photo by writer

MC Thakur

Manali, November 22

A week after heavy snowfall blocked the Manali-Rohtang-Keylong highway, the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) today cleared the stretch. Vehicles are expected to cross Rohtang on Thursday.According to an official of the BRO, snow has been cleared from both sides of the 13,050-ft Rohtang Pass, the gateway to Lahaul-Spiti.He said the surface was still slippery due to the presence of a thick layer of ice. Till the filing of this report, no vehicle had crossed the Rohtang Pass. A large number of people in Lahaul valley are eagerly waiting for the authorities to open the road.Koksar rescue post in-charge Pawan Kumar said although snow had been cleared, the road was still slippery.He said 46 persons, who were waiting for the road to open at Koksar, were being provided food and shelter.“We have been asked to send vehicles from Lahaul to Koksar first. Today, we checked the road condition and found a number of frozen stretches between Koksar and Rohtang,” he said.The BRO’s 38 Border Road Task Force commander Col Arvind Awasthi said the highway would not be opened to the general public, but in case of an emergency, vehicles would be allowed to pass.According to officials in Lahaul, first preference would be given to those who were stuck in the valley and only then vehicles from Manali would be allowed to come towards Rohtang.Many people who wanted to go to Lahaul from Manali had booked taxis to reach Lahaul via Kishtwar route which takes about two days.Meanwhile, the Manali administration is not letting tourists go beyond Kothi.A truck driver, Rajender Kumar, who resides in Mandi district, was coming from Leh towards Keylong when he was trapped in blizzards at Bharatpur on Thursday. He spent two nights in the truck and eventually decided to walk over thick snow towards Keylong.After walking for about 25 km, he reached Snow and Avalanche Study Establishment at Patseo where he was given shelter.A rescue team from Keylong went to Patseu today to bring Rajender to Keylong. He and other stranded persons are expected to cross Rohtang on Thursday.


Opposition against Bharat Ratna for KM Cariappa is a distraction. The real target is General Bipin Rawat

Farooq Abdullah, the former chief minister of Jammu & Kashmir, likes to make provocative statements. Few take him seriously anymore. His latest remark, “Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) belongs to Pakistan”, can therefore be summarily dismissed – but only after setting the record straight.

Abdullah said India had “betrayed” the people of J&K by not granting the state autonomy and not implementing its promise of holding a plebiscite. (Note: Not a word meanwhile escaped from the loquacious Abdullah during his press interaction on the betrayal by successive J&K governments of 4,00,000 Pandits driven from their homes by Islamists and separatists towards whom the father-son party, the National Conference, leans.)

Abdullah senior, as usual, is muddle-headed over the “promise” of a plebiscite in J&K. Of course, a plebiscite was promised by Jawaharlal Nehru. And of course that promise was formalised in a United Nations resolution in August 1948 even as the India-Pakistan war over Jammu & Kashmir still raged.

war690_111717021202.jpgIndian soldiers during the 1947–1948 war. Photo credit: Wikipedia

The resolution said: First, enforce a ceasefire. On December 31, 1948, a ceasefire was duly enforced. The resolution went on to say: Second, all Pakistani troops and other irregular Pakistani fighters must vacate the whole of Jammu & Kashmir.

Was that done? No. Sixty-nine years later, PoK remains under illegal occupation by Pakistan in defiance of the 1948 UN resolution.

The UN resolution said third and finally: Once all Pakistani troops and other Pakistani irregular tribal fighters vacate the whole of Jammu & Kashmir, a plebiscite in the state will be called. By not complying with the second condition of the UN resolution to vacate PoK, Pakistan forfeits the right to the third condition: ie, a plebiscite.

Farooq Abdullah knows this perfectly well. And yet every few months, in order to placate the National Conference’s communal vote bank, he raises the issue of autonomy, plebiscite and PoK.

He is best ignored but the issues he raises cannot be.

Abdullah’s comment contradicts India’s position on PoK articulated in an all-party resolution adopted by a Congress-led Parliament in 1994 that PoK is an integral part of India.

Abdullah’s scatter-brained remark, however, serves the useful purpose of shining a light on the first war between India and Pakistan in 1947-48 over Jammu & Kashmir spearheaded by Field Marshal KM Cariappa whose “singular distinction”, historian Ramachandra Guha recently wrote, “was that he was the first army chief. He was not necessarily the best, either in the field or as a tactician.”

cariappain690_111717020857.jpg

Is Guha right?

Consider the facts.

Cariappa was the first Indian army chief, taking over in January 1949 from the last British chief of the Indian army, Lt. General Sir Roy Bucher.

What was Cariappa’s role in the long battle in 1947-48 to drive the invading Pakistani army and its tribal forces out of Poonch, Kargil and Uri?

In early-1948, as GOC-in-C of the Western Command, Lt General Cariappa led the force that recaptured Poonch, Kargil, Dras and other areas that the Pakistani army had overrun.

The Indians had been ill-prepared for the war over J&K that erupted weeks after the accession of the state to India. The Pakistani army, helped by irregular tribal fighters, made deep inroads into J&K. General Cariappa appointed Lt General KS Thimayya as GOC of the 19th Division as the war wore on.

By mid-1948, General Cariappa’s troops were pushing the Pakistani army back. The tide had turned decisively in India’s favour.

Politics now struck. Nehru was “persuaded” by the United States to halt the Indian army’s advance. Despite orders from New Delhi to scale back the Indian army’s thrust to drive the Pakistani army out of the whole of Jammu & Kashmir, General Cariappa defied the government and continued to push forward, securing Ladakh for India before operations ceased.

Following the UN mandated ceasefire on December 31, 1948, General Cariappa was appointed the first Indian to head the Indian Army. He took over as commander-in-chief of the army from Lt General Sir Roy Bucher on January 15, 1949. The day is celebrated as Army Day.

General Cariappa was conferred the rank of Field Marshal in 1986 by the Rajiv Gandhi government at the age of 87. The only other Indian army officer to be conferred the rank of Field Marshal (by, incidentally, the Indira Gandhi government) was Sam Manekshaw in 1973, when he was only 58.

rawat.jpg690_111717020907.jpg

As a young Major, Manekshaw like General Thimayya had served under General Cariappa in the 1947-48 India-Pakistan war. Manekshaw though never saw action on the J&K battlefront and was posted to MO Directorate. Manekshaw had, however, proved himself on the battlefield in Burma in 1942 during World War 2. He was lauded for bravery, but did not, unlike Cariappa, get to command a battalion.

Whether or not Field Marshal Cariappa deserves a posthumous Bharat Ratna, as army chief General Bipin Rawat has recommended, is not the key issue. The key question is the accuracy of Guha’s claim that Field Marshal Cariappa’s “singular distinction was that he was the first (Indian) army chief.”

Singular?

The evidence suggests Guha is wrong. There is a deep but unspoken anger among Left-leaning “intellectuals” (I use the word loosely) against General Bipin Rawat following the army chief’s commendation of Major Gogoi in the jeep incident amidst stone pelting in the Valley. Anything that General Rawat says will see bile from these sections of Indian society rise to the surface and curdle, trapped in its sourness.

Field Marshal Cariappa’s Bharat Ratna is a convenient distraction. The real target is General Bipin Rawat.


Congress raises questions over Rafale deal, BJP hits back

Congress raises questions over Rafale deal, BJP hits back
File photo for representation only.

New Delhi, November 14Raising questions over the Rafale fighter aircraft deal, the Congress on Tuesday accused the government of having compromised national interest and security while promoting “crony capitalism” and causing a loss to the public exchequer.The BJP rubbished the allegation, claiming it was intended to “divert attention” as the party bigwigs faced the prospect of being questioned in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scandal.The Congress’ communications department head Randeep Surjewala alleged the government neglected the interests of public sector Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) as Dassault Aviation, the French manufacturer of Rafale aircraft refused to transfer technology to it and instead entered into an agreement with Reliance Defence.He also alleged that the aircraft was being purchased at much higher rates than what was decided after the completion of the tender process under the previous UPA government.The BJP hit right back, with its spokesman GVL Narasimha Rao claiming that the Congress party was engaging in a “stunt” by raising the Rafale issue as it was scared at the prospect of its top leadership, including the Gandhis, being questioned in the VVIP chopper scam.He said after the arrest of middleman Carlos Gerosa in Italy last month and his likely extradition to India soon, “the Congress has made baseless allegations over Rafale deal to divert public attention and to cry political vendetta”.“None of these stunts will work and the Congress must be ready to answer who took bribes in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal as the money trail is going to become known after the extradition of Carlos Gerosa,” he told PTI.“Modi government is known for integrity and all its actions are above board, while the Congress party is synonymous with sleaze, corruption and crony capitalism,” he said.Surjewala said the UPA government floated a tender on August 20, 2007, for purchase of 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) for the Air Force and, post negotiations, two of them—Rafale and Eurofighter Typhoon remained in the reckoning.On December 12, 2012, Rafale was declared L1 vendor, the bidder whose quotation is the lowest, with base price of USD 10.20 billion (Rs 54,000 crore according to the conversion rate prevalent then).It was decided that of the 126 aircraft, 18 would come in fly away condition and the remaining 108 will be manufactured in India by HAL with transfer of technology, he said.After the Modi government was formed in May 2014, Surjewala said, the earlier Request for Proposal (RFP) for purchase of 126 aircraft was cancelled on July 30, 2015, and signed a deal on September 26 the next year for procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets for USD 8.7 billion.Later, he said, Anil Ambani’s Reliance Defence Limited tied up with Dassault Aviation for a joint venture for defence production in India on October 3, 2016.“There is complete non-transparency, flagrant violation of mandatory provision of Defence Procurement Procedure, sacrificing national interest on transfer of technology to PSU HAL and blatant promotion of financial interests of crony capitalist friends of the prime minister have marred the purchase of the aircraft,” Surjewala alleged.The Congress leader claimed that each aircraft would have cost Rs 526.10 crore in accordance with the negotiations under the UPA dispensation. Each aircraft would now cost Rs 1570.80 crore, he said, adding “huge” loss was being caused to the exchequer.“The Modi government is indulging in an unforgivable game of compromising national interest and national security. A huge scam is brewing in the procurement of fighter aircraft.“Grave apprehensions and claims of insurmountable loss being caused to public exchequer are in public domain with the government maintaining a conspiratorial silence,” he said.Surjewala also alleged that the deal between Dassault Aviation and Reliance Defence Limited did not have the approval of the Union Cabinet, Cabinet Committee on Security and Foreign Investment Promotion Board.“It is time for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government to answer to people of India as to why government is buying 36 Rafale aircraft at a highly inflated price compared to originally negotiated base price by UPA-Congress,” he said. — PTI


No shortage of arms for Army, says chief General Bipin Rawat

No shortage of arms for Army, says chief General Bipin Rawat
Army chief General Bipin Rawat. File photo

Varanasi, November 10

Chief of Army Staff Gen Bipin Rawat on Friday claimed that there is no shortage of arms in the Army.“The Army has no shortage of arms. We have to keep modernising weapons, arms as the technology is upgrading, and we are trying to bring in new and modernised ones in our Army,” General Rawat told the media after attending the bicentenary celebration of 9 Gorkha Rifles at 39 Gorkha Training Centre here.General Rawat also said that stone-pelting incidents in the Valley had decreased.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

“Stone-pelting incidents have come down to some extent. The Army, Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and Jammu and Kashmir Police are working together in the state. Solution to this can’t be achieved overnight. The government, intelligence agencies, state administration all are making efforts. Will be successful if things go in this direction, can say this with belief,” he said.Speaking on nomination of late Field Marshal KM Cariappa for Bharat Ratna, Gen Rawat said, “The final decision depends on the government, whatever is decided will be acceptable.”Earlier in the day, Gen Rawat visited the Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Varanasi with his family and prayed for the safety of soldiers on borders. “Prayed for the safety and security of our jawans on borders,” he said.The Army chief was on a two-day visit to Varanasi, along with his family, to attend the bicentenary bicentenary celebration of 9 Gorkha Rifles. ANI


Three militants killed in Pulwama gunfight

Three militants killed in Pulwama gunfight
As security forces tightened the cordon, the hiding militants fired at them. Tribune file

Srinagar, November 7

Three militants of the Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) outfit were killed in an overnight gunfight with the security forces at Aglar village of Jammu and Kashmir’s Pulwama district, police said.“One soldier of 44 Rashtriya Rifles (RR) was martyred and two soldiers and a civilian were injured during the operation,” police said, adding that the encounter had ended.“The slain militants included two Pakistani nationals and a local. The martyred soldier has been identified as Sham Sunder.” The injured are being treated in the hospital.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

“Three weapons–one AK, one M16 rifle and one pistol–besides ammunition were recovered from the encounter site,” said a police spokesman, adding that the identification of the bodies was being done.“It is the same group that was wanted for the attack on the police check-post in Rajpora.”A joint team of Army’s 44 RR, Special Operations Group (SOG) of Jammu and Kashmir Police and the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) cordoned off the village after getting inputs about the presence of militants there.As security forces tightened the cordon, the hiding militants fired at them after which a gunfight started on Monday evening.  Showkat Ahmad, a civilian, was injured when protesters clashed with the security forces to disrupt the operation against the militants.Internet services have been suspended in Pulwama district to check the spread of rumours. IANS 


A state run by terrorists

Saeed’s release proves Pakistan has taken a turn for the worse

It is no surprise that a Pakistani court has allowed Lashkare-Taiba (LeT) chief Hafiz Saeed to walk the streets again. From the start, his detention was little more than an eyewash by the Pakistani administration in response to the global criticism of LeT’s role in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. Saeed was not formally charged with terror crimes; his detention was based on minor public order rules. His release is likely an outcome of a changed domestic political landscape in Pakistan. LeT is the terrorist group most closely associated with the Pakistani military, so any serious action against Saeed was unlikely. The battle over his detention helped highlight Pakistan’s state sponsorship of terror to the rest of the world and promoted a broader, long-term policy of isolating Pakistan within the international community.

What precipitated Saeed’s release is the power struggle between Pakistan’s former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and the military establishment. One could almost say the failure of the government to press a charge against Saeed signifies Sharif’s decline. The judgment is just as much a reflection of the military’s heightened power. Part of the military’s strategy is promoting a cluster of political parties to undermine Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz). These include a political party structured around LeT. With Pakistani general elections scheduled for next year, it was necessary for Saeed to be released so that the LeT chief could effect the transition from a pretend prisoner to an authentic politician.

While Saeed’s release is reprehensible, it should be recognised that his conviction on terror charges would have meant a fundamental shift in the mindset of the Pakistani military establishment. His release indicates that if there is any change, it is only for the worse. Rawalpindi’s generals seem to have concluded that it makes sense to bring Saeed and his murderous cohorts into the political mainstream. Pakistan may now cease being a state sponsor of terrorism and instead become a state run by terrorists.


WHERE ARE WE TAKING INDIA LEGACY :: ARE WE LESS THAN MOGULS OR WORSE TO ERASE INDIAN HISTORY

THE VEDIO GIVES INSIDE OUT OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF DAYAL SINGH MAJITIA , A WELL KNOW APOLITICAL LEADER EVER BORN IN INDIA.

WHERE ARE WE TAKING INDIA, IS INDIA NOW VANDE MARATAM ONLY AND NOTHING ELSE. WHY ARE WE PLAYING AND DISTORTING HISTORY AND ERASING A NOBLE SOULS CONTRIBUTION TO THE SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION.

WHY CAN’T  GOVT BUILD NEW COLLEGE WITH THE NAME “VANDE MARATAM OR JAN GAN MANN, OR SADAR PATEL OR DIN DAYAL UPADIYA . IT SEEMS THE AIM IS TO RUIN THE INTERNAL FABRIC  OF THE SOCIETY WITH CHEAP IDEOLOGY  AND DEGRADED MORALS.


Epic Battles: Revisiting Jaswantgarh And Rezangla Of 1962 On Their Anniversaries by Syed Ata Hasnain

The Jaswantgarh war memorialThe Jaswantgarh war memorial
Snapshot
  • Fifty-five years ago, this day, the heroic battle of Jaswantgarh was fought and here’s an account of how 4 Garhwal Rifles along with the Garhwali Bhullas stood up to the aggressor with valour.

17 and 18 November 1962 are two days enshrined boldly in India’s abundant military heritage. These two dates, so close to each other, symbolise valour and sacrifice of the highest order; they relate to the Sino-Indian Border Conflict 1962. As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) fought a largely unprepared Indian Army, thrust into battle at foreboding heights in winter, post after post and defended area after another fell in the way of its advance. Almost a month after the Chinese launched their invasion on 20 October 1962 in NEFA and Ladakh gaining large tracts of territory and forcing the Indian Army to withdraw, two brave units fought an epic battle, each to bloody the Chinese and restore the image of the Indian Army. Coincidentally, one battle was in each of the two theatres of conflict – NEFA (now Arunachal Pradesh) and Ladakh.

A bust of Major Shaitan Singh (Medovar/Wikimedia Commons)A bust of Major Shaitan Singh (Medovar/Wikimedia Commons)

On 18 November 1962, in the forward defences of Chushul in the Eastern Ladakh sector, an Ahir company of 13 Kumaon under the command of Major Shaitan Singh, Param Vir Chakra (posthumous), withstood a series of attacks on its position and imposed heavy casualties on the enemy. This company occupying defences at Rezangla, provided depth to the Chushul Bowl, which was defended by 114 Infantry Brigade. In the morning of 18 November 1962, the Chinese PLA contacted the defences of one of the forward platoons. From then onwards it was a battle of attrition between them and the Kumaonis. Outgunned and outnumbered, the Kumaonis stuck on with the age old doctrine adage – ‘last man, last round’. Inspiring this obstinate stand and refusal to withdrawal was the company commander Maj Shaitan Singh who too was finally martyred. 13 Kumaon lost 114 all ranks and nine were severely wounded. This was a classic case of employment of sound sub unit tactics and it resulted in hundreds of PLA soldiers being killed. 13 Kumaon was bestowed with the battle honour Rezangla, the only honour granted for operations in Ladakh.

The second battle honour of 1962 was bestowed on 4 Garhwal Rifles (Garh Rif), for the heroic performance of the unit at Nuranang now called Jaswantgarh on 17 November 1962. It was the only battle honour won by a unit in the eastern theatre in 1962. 4 Garh Rif is my unit; raised by my father in 1959. I was its 14th Commanding Officer. This write up is not a tactical explanation of the battle of Jaswantgarh. It is simply a rendering of a layman account for public knowledge of what really happened and how the unit stood out so valiantly. It is my dedication to the three officers, four Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs), 147 other ranks and seven non combatant tradesmen who were martyred at the Battle of Jaswantgarh. I knew almost all of them having been a six year old with the unit when it was raised. The unit is celebrating and marking the 55th anniversary of the battle on 17 November 2017, located far into the mountains of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) where this year on Independence Day it was again the recipient of the largest number of honours and awards for its spectacular operation against infiltrating Pakistani terrorists. The operation was quoted to me by none other than Gen Bipin Rawat, Chief of Army Staff (COAS); he described the conduct as a copy book model for counter infiltration operations.

Before going on to provide a non tactical explanation of the battle of Jaswantgarh, it may be motivating for the reader to be aware of what Lt Gen BM Kaul wrote about the unit in his book The Untold Story. Describing the performance of units on the eastern front, he wrote “if more units of the Indian Army had fought the way 4 Garh Rif did, the history of the 1962 War may perhaps have been different”

In mid 1962 the unit was serving at Ramgarh, Bihar, and had just returned from counter insurgency operations in Nagaland. In September, it received its mobilisation orders and moved to Chardwar, near Rangia, Assam. As the Chinese threat increased progressively, the unit moved up from Tezpur and was deployed north west of the Tawang Chhu river. It did extensive patrolling and dominated the Tawang area. C company under its company commander, Maj (later Col) Hasta Bahadur Rai, patrolled the upper reaches of Tawang to prevent any infiltration.

When the Chinese attacked on 20 October 1962, the operations commenced from Thagla on the flank and then moved on to Bumla. The aim was to outflank and get to Tawang at the earliest before resting the front on the Tawang Chhu River to allow road building, move up of artillery and build up of logistics. Maj Rai’s company went out of communication with the battalion HQ and fell back much later as the withdrawal to own side of Tawang Chhu commenced through the bridge of Jang. (Please refer to the not to scale sketch in which most landmarks being referred here are reflected).

Schematic sketch showing the advance of the Chinese to Sela between 20 October and 20 November 1962.Schematic sketch showing the advance of the Chinese to Sela between 20 October and 20 November 1962.

The first phase of the Chinese operations ceased with the fall of Tawang. 4 Garh Rif was not involved in any of the serious fighting till then. It had reinforced Bumla with a company for a short while before operations commenced, but it withdrew on orders well before. With the Indian Army defeated and pushed back behind the Tawang Chhu, HQ 4 Infantry Division under Maj Gen MS Pathania issued orders for the occupation of Sela, the highest pass in the area, and its preparation as the new main position. In order to do this, it was necessary to keep the Chinese reconnaissance parties at bay and prevent them from crossing the Tawang Chhu.

It was also necessary that should the Chinese decide to attack earlier there should be sufficient organised defence ahead of Sela, the new main position where the ultimate battle would be fought for the restoration of the prestige of the Indian Army and the defeat of the PLA. Such a task is performed by what is called ‘covering troops’ by deploying ahead, absorbing the initial weight of the attack and preventing contact with the main defences. 4 Garh Rif was given the onerous task of occupying Nuranang, between Sela and Jang, as a covering position and performed the role of covering troops.

An inscription at the war memorialAn inscription at the war memorial

In current times you can drive from Tezpur to Tenga, break journey for the night before you start the next day, the arduous but highly picturesque drive to Sela (13,500 feet) via Roopa, Bomdila and Baisakhi. As you descend from Sela towards Jang, approximately 11 km away is a huge memorial, dedicated to the battle for the covering position at Nuranang fought valiantly by the unit. It succeeded in giving the Chinese a bloody nose. The memorial has changed shape and size many times but it has never lost the reverence of the local people, the Monpas nor that of the hordes of travellers who now halt to stretch, photograph, consume glasses of tea and pay obeisance at the virtual shrine which has emerged over a period of time. The shrine next to the memorial is that of Jaswant Baba. It’s a post martyrdom personification giving him great reverence. Jaswant was a rifleman of 4 Garh Rif. He earned a Mahavir Chakra posthumously for his gallant action at Nuranang. In his memory and honour, Nuranang is now called Jaswantgarh; it’s actually the location of the battlefield which is called by that name.

Here is a description of that heroic display by the unit at Jaswantgarh:

After the fall of Tawang, as the unit withdrew through Jang, almost the last unit to do so, the iron bridge over the river Tawang Chhu was finally destroyed as a reserved demolition. Alfa company under the command of 2/Lt (later colonel) S N Tandon was deployed at the current location of the memorial at the plateau which falls steeply towards the road going down to Jang. The battalion HQ, a company and the three-inch mortars were deployed approximately 1.5 km towards Sela, along the track. One company occupied the high ground to the north across the road and beyond the deep depression through which the Nuranang river flows. The fourth company was towards the south and slightly west of the memorial area covering the southern approach.

By 16 November 1962, the defences were in reasonable state although there was little overhead protection. The defences were being constantly shelled by the Chinese who had good observation from across the Tawang Chhu. Our artillery observation post officers also did likewise against PLA deployment. In the interim the CO, Lt Col (let Maj Gen) BM Bhattacharjee, decided to send some patrols to dominate the forward zone. One of these patrols led by 2/Lt Vinod Goswami volunteered to cross the Tawang Chhu by improvised means to ascertain strength and deployment of the PLA and if possible to capture a Chinese prisoner. The patrol moved by stealth, performed its task. While returning it targeted a PLA bunker and captured a sentry alive. Unfortunately, while bringing the prisoner across the Tawang Chhu it became extremely difficult to handle him as he was also wounded. He was finally abandoned believed dead. Goswami led some other daring missions during the run up to the battle at Jaswantgarh.

Finally on the night of 16/17 November, almost in sync with operations at Rezangla, the Chinese commenced phase two of their offensive. Probing actions against Alfa company were made by Chinese dressed as Monpa women but the troops (Bhullas) responded in time. Through 17 November and till the night of 17/18 November the location came under five heavy attacks and all were beaten back. After the third attempt, the Chinese managed to deploy a heavy machine gun (HMG) on the left (southern flank of Alfa company and its fire made it impossible for the Bhullas to fight effectively. This was the crucial moment. A party of three volunteers was formed. It comprised L/Nk Trilok Singh, riflemen Gopal Singh and Jaswant Singh. This party moved first by stealth and then under covering fire. In a hand to hand melee lasting several minutes the HMG was silenced and the crew was killed.

The bold action involved Trilok providing covering fire from a short distance away while Jaswant and Gopal assaulted and beheaded the PLA detachment with khukris. While recovering the weapon and dragging it back, Jaswant was killed by a burst. Trilok similarly died when the Chinese targeted him realising that it was his fire which had enabled the action. Gopal succeeded in returning with the weapon. The area around Alfa company and the slope towards Jang was strewn with a large number of bodies of PLA soldiers. The fourth and fifth PLA attacks were equally ferocious virtually following the tactics of human waves. However, Number 3 Platoon of Alfa company, under Sub Jatan Singh held on tenaciously.

As the battle was enjoined and the Garhwalis were creating history, the Chinese probed the flanks from a wide arc infiltrating self contained troops into the depth areas north and south of Sela. The pass was well stocked for battle and nearing completion of its defences, which were spread on both shoulders. Unfortunately there remained a perception in the mind of senior commanders about the invincibility of the Chinese soldier and an image of them being 10 feet tall, persisted. The masterful resistance by the Garhwalis at Jaswantgarh could not alter that perception.

As reports of Chinese infiltration came into HQ 4 Infantry Division there was panic, and orders to withdraw from Jaswantgarh were issued even as 4 Garh Rif was ready for more. It had sustained very few casualties, in fact, just three killed and a few wounded. Its three remaining companies were largely untouched except for shelling. However, through 18-19 November the unit withdrew on orders and reached Sela. There, the Commander 62 Infantry Brigade, the famous Brig Hoshiar Singh, briefed Lt Col Bhattacharjee. Two columns for the withdrawal to Bomdila were formed one each under the Commander and the CO. Two companies each of 4 Garh Rif formed the protection of each columns, which had many HQ personnel and stragglers withdrawing in panic.

The two columns ran into a series of Chinese ambushes as they tried cross country movements. In one of the ambushes, Brig Hoshiar Singh is reputed to have been wounded and captured. His refusal to submit to his captors is reputed to have enraged them leading to him being killed in cold blood. The Chinese strength of infiltrators far outnumbered the strength of the withdrawing columns. The attrition on the ambushes was intense and the troops dispersed in small groups many crossing into Bhutan on the west and made their way towards the rear, suffering intense cold with many cases of frost bite. Many were taken prisoner, including Lt Col BM Bhattacharjee and the Adjutant Capt Dharam Pal. Major HB Rai, 2/Lt SN Tandon and 2/Lt RP Singh were among the prisoners. 2/Lt VInod Goswami, Lt Hari Kishen Dev and Capt BK Nath(RMO) were killed at unknown places and time during the withdrawal.

The Garhwalis proved heroic in the custody of the Chinese too. They were singled out for maltreatment because of their stiff resistance at Jaswantgarh. Capt Dharampal was tortured and placed in isolated confinement due to his numerous attempts at escape. He was my first CO when I was commissioned in 1974. The strength of martyrs of the unit amounted to three officers, four JCOs, 147 ORs and seven non combatised tradesmen. A very large number became winter casualties. When the unit assembled at Ramgarh, the new CO Lt Col IS Rawat, KC had to virtually carry out re-raising. All citations were sent under his pen after meticulously charting out events from interviews with the men. The unit had lost its war diary and all its property. The citations led to award of two Maha Vir Chakra (MVC), 7 Vir Chakra (VrCs), 6 SMS and a host of other awards. Lt Col BM Bhattacharjee and Rifleman Jaswant received the MVC; among the VrC winners were L/Nk Trilok Singh, Rifleman Gopal Singh, 2/Lt SN Tandon, 2/Lt VINOD Goswami and Subedar Jatan Singh Gusain. The unit was finally awarded the battle honour Nuranang which is colloquially called Jaswantgarh.

Unfortunately the local people have created a myth around the battle of Jaswantgarh, crediting the resistance and heroic action only to Jaswant Singh and two young girls, Nura and Sela, who allegedly helped him resist the Chinese. Local folklore has it that the Chinese finally captured Jaswant Singh and beheaded him, taking his head away as trophy. These tales have their own place and have been written about and romanticised by media; even a film is being made about the myth of Jaswant Singh.

The only truth lies in the historical record of The Garhwal Rifles and the great spoken reputation that the Garhwali Bhullas acquired after the heroic battle of Jaswantgarh. Today, on 17 November, on the 55th anniversary of the battle, we, the members of the community of the Jaswantgarh Battalion bow our heads in reverence to our ancestors and resolve never to let down the reputation and name of the Nation and the Regiment.

This has to end with the war cries of the Garhwalis and Kumaonis.

Kalika Mata Ki Jai! (war cry of the Kumaonis).

Bol Badri Vishal Lal Ki Jai! (victory to the followers of Badri Vishal). Badri Vishal is the personification of Lord Vishnu, the presiding deity of the Garhwalis.

Jai Hind!

The author is a second generation officer of 4 Garhwal Rifles, the unit which fought at Jaswantgarh. He was its 14th Commanding Officer.