Sanjha Morcha

US cracks down on Indian IT firms; lists steps to detect fraud

US cracks down on Indian IT firms; lists steps to detect fraud
The application process for this year’s H-1B visas opens in US.

Washington, April 4

The US on Tuesday announced multiple measures to “deter and detect” what it described as “fraud and abuse” of H-1B work visas, the most sought after by Indian IT firms and professionals.

The announcement by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) comes on a day on which the federal agency started accepting applications for H-1B visas for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2017.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

The USCIS announcement indicated that the US government is going to be tough and stringent in approval of H-1B visas this year.

The USCIS has a Congressional mandate to issue 65,000 H-1B visas in general category and another 20,000 for those applicants having higher education, masters and above, from US universities in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Asserting that its multiple measures announced today will further “deter and detect H-1B visa fraud and abuse”, the USCIS said the H-1B visa programme should help US companies recruit highly-skilled foreign nationals when there is a shortage of qualified workers in the country.

“Yet, too many American workers who are as qualified, willing and deserving to work in these fields have been ignored or unfairly disadvantaged. Protecting American workers by combating fraud in our employment-based immigration programs is a priority for the USCIS,” a statement said.

The USCIS also announced the launch of an email helpline against abuse and fraud of H-1B visas. The USCIS will now onwards take a more targeted approach when making site visits across the country to H-1B petitioners and the work sites of H-1B employees.

The USCIS will focus on cases where it cannot validate the employer’s basic business information through commercially available data; H-1B-dependent employers (those who have a high ratio of H-1B workers as compared to US workers, as defined by statute); and employers petitioning for H-1B workers who work off-site at another company or organisation’s location.

Targeted site visits will allow USCIS to focus resources where fraud and abuse of the H-1B programme may be more likely to occur, and determine whether H-1B dependent employers are evading their obligation to make a good faith effort to recruit US workers, a media release said.

Noting that it will continue random and unannounced visits nationwide, USCIS said these site visits are not meant to target non-immigrant employees for any kind of criminal or administrative action but rather to identify employers who are abusing the system.

“Employers who abuse the H-1B visa programme negatively affect US workers, decreasing wages and job opportunities as they import more foreign workers,” it said.

“To further deter and detect abuse, USCIS has established an email address, which will allow individuals (including both American workers and H-1B workers who suspect they or others may be the victim of H-1B fraud or abuse) to submit tips, alleged violations and other relevant information about potential H-1B fraud or abuse,” it said.

The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows American firms to employ foreign workers in occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise. The technology companies depend on it to hire tens of thousands of employees each year.

During his election campaign, President Donald Trump had promised to increase oversight of our H-1B and L-1 visa programmes.

The White House also warned against abuse and fraud of H-1B visas by companies.

“The Trump Administration will be enforcing laws protecting American workers from discriminating hiring practices,” White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told reporters at his daily news conference.

Today opens the application process for this year’s H-1B visas, he said.

“The President has spoken about the H-1B visa programme in the past,” he added.

“The White House acknowledges that there are issues with the programme as it currently stands. However, there are several laws that are on the books that went unenforced in the previous administration,” Spicer said. —PTI


Dalai in Tawang: Test of India’s will Syed Ata Hasnain

Should India expect a Chinese response other than political and diplomatic?

Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama (Photo: AP)

 Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama (Photo: AP)

The current standoff between India and China over the Dalai Lama’s visit to Tawang from April 4 is a lot more than just his emotive longing to visit the great monastery which he had last graced in 2009. It’s a political, military and diplomatic game which China, more than India, has been indulging in for the past many years. India has usually been the responder. During the last two decades of the 20th century China followed the principle of stable borders and decided not to disturb the status quo lest it hinder the process of its modernisation. Only the standoff with India at Sumdorongchhu in May 1987 after the Indian Army’s Exercise Chequerboard, caused short-term disturbance of this policy. From 1993, when the Peace and Tranquility Agreement was signed, there was relative peace at the borders. However, one can recall how progressively over time India perceived that eventually it would have to be the Chinese threat it would have to militarily contend with in the long term. George Fernandes as defence minister was one of the few who had the courage to openly say this in 1998.

For some years now, China has been testing India’s will and capability through “walk-in actions” at the Line of Actual Control (LAC),  signifying its readiness to reactivate its borders after achieving a degree of higher confidence after the PLA’s modernisation. However, with the coming of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014 and his proactive outreach and intent of taking economic relations well beyond, it appeared that the relationship would finally shed past perceptions. Once the relationship improved, the two nations would be ready for serious negotiations on the border issue. In fact, trade and economics were meant to make the border issue much less significant. A couple of things have disturbed the emerging bonhomie and rare chemistry that was on display between Prime Minister Modi and President Xi Jingping in 2014, that promised a much more cordial relationship.

First, even before Mr Modi took office, China’s broad strategic policy did not ever look towards India as an equal within Asia. Although economic cooperation had continued at a high pitch, the political relationship was always hamstrung by this Chinese perception. It is a natural phenomenon relating to two large neighbours wary of each other’s intent and the border dispute was only a factor for exploitation.

In recent years, China has firmed up its view that India is ever willing to enter into partnerships that primarily target it. India’s legitimate concerns on China’s aggressive stance at the border and in its relationship with Pakistan doesn’t appear to have ever been taken into account; trust was obviously in great deficit ever since 1962. Earlier, in partnership with Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and now with the United States and Japan, extending even to Vietnam, India’s emerging relationships appear to have made China wary. Mr Modi’s special effort to build trust and a personal relationship with the Chinese leadership scored spectacular success, but his special relationships with both former US President Barack Obama and Japanese PM Shinzo Abe perhaps became a fear factor for China. It only underscores the degree of difficulty in maintaining equal and mutually beneficial partnerships with multiple nations without one or the other being suspicious of the other. Second, the coming of the high-profile China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), particularly with the alignment passing through Gilgit-Baltistan, there has been considerable fallout on the region’s strategic environment. Whatever be China’s military and economic compulsions, the execution of a major strategic initiative through disputed territory claimed totally by India impinges on its sensitivity in no small way. It even enhances the scope for strategic collusion between Pakistan and China.

Third, the diplomatic signals have not been encouraging at all. China’s refusal in the UN Security Council to have Masood Azhar classified as a terrorist or placing obstacles in the way of India’s bid to become a member of the Nuclear Supplies Group (NSG) have obviously only created more negative sentiment in India. India sensed that these actions were designed to send home subtle messages about China’s concerns on the emerging India-US Strategic Partnership and India’s efforts to reach out to Japan and Vietnam. For China, anything contributing towards its stronger relationship with Pakistan works against India. Fourth, the recent very visible actions undertaken by China within South Asia appear to be a drawing of the erstwhile “string of pearls” into a tighter noose; strategic messaging packaged smartly. The changing status of ownership of Hambantota port in Sri Lanka in China’s favour and the visit of a PLA Navy submarine to it were ominous signals. The purchase of Feydoo Island in the Maldives by a Chinese company also raises concerns. The ongoing deal of China’s state-run Zhenhua Oil to  buy Chevron’s gas fields in northeastern Bangladesh bordering Indian states also firms up India’s suspicions, more so as Zhenhua is a subsidiary of China’s Norinco defence industry conglomerate. To cap it all, the Chinese defence minister has paid a well-publicised visit to Sri Lanka and Nepal with some attractive offers of defence equipment. The visit was probably timed for the period just before the Dalai Lama began his intended tour.

There is much concern in strategic circles about India’s defiant attitude and expression of strategic independence in taking the decision in October 2016 to clear the Dalai Lama’s visit. He has been invited for a cultural festival by the BJP government of Arunachal Pradesh; even the 10-day period of the visit is longer than usual. China has employed its usual media blitz the way it always does but also got its official spokesperson to express concern over the future course of Sino-Indian relations. India’s stance appears fairly well calibrated. The cumulative effect of CPEC, the Masood Azhar affair and NSG issue had put it firmly on the defensive. It can’t be seen to be remaining at that position in a fast-moving world where comprehensive national power, punching within one’s weight and strategic independence are all seen as rolled into one.

Should India expect a Chinese response other than political and diplomatic? Prudence demands readiness for all contingencies, and nothing which exacerbates the situation. Military calibration by China is always a possibility, but it must take into account the implications and end results; a strategy without an aim achieves nothing. Does it have the will to launch military operations, and to what purpose? India’s national pride and its international standing is a factor that it cannot ignore. For all their deficient capabilities, the Indian armed forces are no pushover. A localised border action to embarrass India can’t be guaranteed to carry any assurance of success, and will always bear the potential for a larger conflagration. China is known for its strategic pragmatism. It must realise that the Dalai Lama’s visit to Tawang was not designed to embarrass China but more as a message to the people of Arunachal Pradesh. It is a matter of perception even as unnecessary symbolism needs to be reduced in the relationship. Many across the world will be observing these developments, chiefly in East and Southeast Asia, and in Pakistan eyes will be peeled to see if India wilts under pressure. The decision to continue with the visit will give the Indian government much more confidence in handling its northern neighbour.


Bhakra water level plummets Good snowfall over Himalayas expected to offset water deficiency

Bhakra water level plummets

Vijay Mohan and Sanjeev Singh Bariana

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, March 31

While the water level in the Gobind Sagar reservoir at Bhakra Dam is down to just about 14 per cent of its storage capacity, good snowfall over the Himalayas this winter is expected to offset the water deficiency. The storage at this time last year was 33 per cent.Though the water level at Bhakra (recorded at 1,523 feet today) is down 52 feet from the last year’s corresponding figure, inflow into the reservoir this month is more due to increased snowmelt because of relatively higher day temperature, according to Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) officials.With less than normal storage, the BBMB cut the water supply to its member states, including Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan, by 10 per cent at the start of winter season. The sates had also reduced their demand by up to 30 per cent, sources said. The demand for irrigation also goes down during spring because of the harvest season.Relatively less snowfall and rainfall last year resulted in the water level go down to 1,656 feet compared to its maximum permissible level of 1,680 feet. Bhakra, which lies on the Sutlej, is primarily snow-fed. The BBMB policy does not permit water level to fall below 1,507 feet to ensure reserves are available to meet the demand for irrigation and drinking water. Power cannot be generated if water level falls below 1,462 feet.“The average inflow at present is 8,800 cusecs as compared to 6,750 cusecs last year,” an official said. “Over the last two years, we were monitoring inflows as per ‘dry’ pattern, the lowest of three categories. Now it is between the ‘dependable’ and ‘mean’ categories, which places us in a fairly comfortable position,” he said.Higher temperatures during spring season could be taken as an indication of a good monsoon, though the Meteorological Department was yet to issue its long-term forecast, BBMB officials said. Earlier this week, a private weather forecast agency had predicted that the monsoon could be less than normal.The level at Pong Dam is 17 per cent of its capacity, as compared to last 10 year’s average of 28 per cent. BBMB officials said low water level at Pong would enable them to carry out technical inspection of water channels.


Kupwara martyr Capt Yadav cremated

Kupwara martyr Capt Yadav cremated
Captain Ayush Yadav

Kanpur: The mortal remains of Captain Ayush Yadav, who was killed in a terrorist attack at an Army camp in Kashmir’s Kupwara district, were consigned to flames here with full military honours on Saturday. The body was taken to Yadav’s house in Jajmau Defence Colony from the mortuary of the 7 Air Force Hospital around 7.30 am, ADM KP Singh said. People paid tribute to the martyr at his house. From the captain’s residence, the mortal remains were taken to Sidhnath Ghat in a truck where he was cremated with full military honours. Capt Yadav had joined the service around three years ago. Three heavily armed terrorists had stormed an Army camp in Kupwara district of Kashmir on Thursday, killing Yadav and two other soldiers before two of the assailants were gunned down in a fierce 35-minute encounter. PTI

 


MALEGAON BLAST Purohit moves SC for bail Bombay HC rejected plea on April 25

Purohit moves SC for bail
S Purohit

New Delhi, April 28

Malegaon blast accused Shrikant Purohit today moved the Supreme Court against the Bombay High Court order rejecting his bail plea in the case.A Bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar said the petition would come up in regular course while rejecting the former lieutenant colonel’s plea for an urgent hearing.The Bombay High Court had on April 25 granted bail to Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, accused of plotting the September 2008 Malegaon blast, but rejectedthe bail plea of co-accused Purohit saying the charges against him were ofgrave nature.Six persons were killed and around 100 injured when a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded in Malegaon town of Nashik district on September 29, 2008.Sadhvi Pragya and 44-year-old Purohit were arrested in 2008. While Sadhvi Pragya, 44, who is suffering from cancer, is undergoing treatment a Madhya Pradesh hospital, Purohit is lodged in Taloja jail in Maharashtra.The high court had said that prima facie no case was made out against Pragya and asked her to furnish a cash surety of Rs 5 lakh and surrender her passport to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).The NIA, which was handed over the probe from ATS, had given a clean chit to Sadhvi Pragya, but had opposed Purohit’s bail plea noting that the charges levelled against Purohit were of serious and grave nature.Referring to the report filed by the NIA, the HC had said: “Purohit was the one who prepared a separate ‘Constitution’ for ‘Hindu Rashtra’ with a separate saffron colour flag. He also discussed about taking revenge for the atrocities committed by the Muslims on Hindus.” The HC had refused to accept Purohit’s contention that he had attended the meetings as part of a “covert military intelligence operation”.The court pointed out the statements of the witnesses that it was Purohit who said their right-wing group Abhinav Bharat should not be just a political party, but should work as an organisation of extremists, having the capacity to eliminate persons opposing the same.According to the investigating agencies, the blast was allegedly carried out by right-wing group Abhinav Bharat. The NIA had opposed Purohit’s bail plea and argued that there was evidence in the form of audio and video recordings, call data records and the statements of the witnesses that prove his involvement in the case.According to the NIA, Purohit had allegedly taken active part in the conspiracy meetings and even agreed to arrange explosives to be used in the blast. — PTI


आर्मी कैंटीन (CSD) में पतंजलि आंवला जूस की बिक्री पर रोक

88

सागर मालवीय, मुंबई
कैंटीन स्टोर्स डिपार्टमेंट (CSD) ने योग गुरु रामदेव की पतंजलि आयुर्वेद के पतंजलि आंवला जूस की बिक्री रोक दी है। सीएसडी ने यह कदम इस प्रॉडक्ट के बारे में एक सरकारी लैबरेटरी से प्रतिकूल रिपोर्ट मिलने के बाद उठाया है।

सीएसडी ने 3 अप्रैल 2017 को लिखे गए एक लेटर में अपने सभी डिपो से कहा कि वे मौजूदा स्टॉक के लिए एक डेबिट नोट बनाएं ताकि उसे लौटाया जा सके। पतंजलि आयुर्वेद ने शुरुआत में जो उत्पाद बाजार में उतारे थे, उनमें आंवला जूस शामिल था। बाजार में आंवला जूस की सफलता ने कंपनी को दो दर्जन से ज्यादा कैटिगरीज में प्रॉडक्ट पेश करने में मदद की थी। कंपनी ने अपने प्रॉडक्ट्स को बहुराष्ट्रीय कंपनियों के उत्पादों के मुकाबले सेहत के लिए बेहतर बताया था।

मामले की जानकारी रखने वाले दो अधिकारियों ने बताया, ‘इस बैच की जांच कोलकाता की सेंट्रल फूड लैबरेटरी में की गई थी। जांच में उसे उपभोग के लिए ठीक नहीं पाया गया। पतंजलि ने आर्मी की सभी कैंटीनों से आंवला जूस को वापस ले लिया है।’ सीएसडी और पतंजलि, दोनों ने ही इस संबंध में ईमेल से भेजे गए सवालों के जवाब नहीं दिए।

कोलकाता की रेफरल गवर्नमेंट लैबरेटरी वही प्रयोगशाला है, जिसने दो साल पहले घोषणा की थी कि उसने नेस्ले मैगी नूडल्स के सैंपल्स में लेड की मात्रा तय सीमा से ज्यादा पाई और उन सैंपल्स में एमएसजी की मौजूदगी भी थी। यह मुद्दा इतना गरम हुआ था कि नेस्ले के पूरे भारत में मैगी ब्रैंड को वापस लेना पड़ा था। कंपनी ने फूड सेफ्टी ऐंड स्टैंडर्ड्स अथॉरिटी ऑफ इंडिया (FSSAI) के आदेश की न्यायिक समीक्षा के लिए कानूनी याचिका दायर की थी।

कैंटीन स्टोर्स डिपार्टमेंट के रिटेल आउटलेट्स में बिस्किट्स से लेकर बीयर, शैंपू और कार तक 5300 प्रॉडक्ट्स करीब 1.2 करोड़ उपभोक्ताओं को बेचे जाते हैं। इन उपभोक्ताओं में आर्मी, नेवी, एयरफोर्स के लोग और उनके परिवारों के अलावा एक्स-सर्विसमेन और उनके परिवार शामिल हैं। सीएसडी की शुरुआत 1948 में की गई थी। इसका मैनेजमेंट रक्षा मंत्रालय करता है। इसके तहत 3901 कैंटीन और 34 डिपो हैं। ज्यादातर कन्ज्यूमर प्रॉडक्ट कंपनियों के लिए सीएसडी के जरिए होने वाली बिक्री उनकी टोटल वॉल्यूम सेल्स का 5-7 पर्सेंट है।

यह पहला मौका नहीं है, जब पतंजलि आयुर्वेद अपने दावों को लेकर रेग्युलेटर्स के साथ विवादों में घिरी है। इससे पहले बिना लाइसेंस के नूडल्स और पास्ता बेचने के लिए उसकी खिंचाई की गई थी। पिछले साल एफएसएसएआई ने सेंट्रल लाइसेंसिंग अथॉरिटी को निर्देश दिया था कि वह पतंजलि को उसके खाद्य तेल ब्रैंड के विज्ञापन को लेकर कारण बताओ नोटिस जारी करे। उस विज्ञापन पर गुमराह करने वाली जानकारी देने का आरोप लगा था।

अब तक पतंजलि की मार्केटिंग अपने आयुर्वेदिक या प्राकृतिक ब्रैंड्स की तुलना उसी तरह के दूसरे प्रॉडक्ट्स से तुलना पर केंद्रित रही है, जिनमें उसके मुताबिक रसायनों का उपयोग होता है। हाल में आईं मीडिया रिपोर्ट्स के अनुसार, राजस्थान, तमिलनाडु, हरियाणा और असम के फूड रेग्युलेटरों ने प्रमुख कंपनियों के नौ उत्पादों को ‘सब-स्टैंडर्ड’ पाया था। ये उत्पाद अप्रैल 2016 से जनवरी 2017 के बीच किए गए टेस्ट्स में फेल हो गए थे।


Can a terrorist sway a nation? … Harish Khare

TODAY, the Frenchmen will be queuing up to vote for a new President. But just three days before the voting was to commence, shots were fired, and a policeman and an Islamist terrorist killed on the Avenue des Champs-Élysées, right in the heart of Paris. There is a shadow of terror and death over France and this shadow threatens to overwhelm the vote. This time, the French voters will be electing more than a president; they are being called upon to make a choice as to what kind of France they want — or, equally importantly, do not want. The Frenchmen have for centuries prided themselves on their civilisational centredness. They have felt themselves to be unique. Others have conceded, however reluctantly, this claim.The French nationalism has always presented itself as a self-contained nobility, directed against neither any other nation nor race. The Frenchmen take legitimate pride in their flag, food, fashion, wines, cheese, art galleries, and other countless fads; yet, all this is marked by a kind of self-assurance that is not mean-spirited. Now, terror threatens to undo this national rectitude. France has witnessed a number of terror attacks in the last two years. But so far, the French society has remained calm and undeterred. The people have not yet been tempted to turn their back on what is called the European project — collective salvation and collective sharing of prosperity and security. Each terror attack tends to strengthen the hands of those who are in favour of closing of the borders and relying on ‘national’ security resources. Today, the people the world over will watch whether the French voters would allow a terrorist or a bunch of terrorists to goad France away from this civilisational self-assurance — or they, too, would give in to xenophobia and vote for a right-winger like Marine Le Pen. If the vote turns out to be in favour of Ms Le Pen, then it would be a most astounding intervention in the French affairs.Marine Le Pen seeks to tap extreme nationalism, of the kind that brought Donald Trump to the White House. The Islamist organisations would have reason to feel enormously satisfied if they manage to influence the French to vote against their better instincts. We in our own country are no stranger to the phenomenon. A handful of persistent terrorists and their malevolent handlers have intervened decisively in our internal politics — and, have opened up space and demand for ‘strong’ leaders who would deal ‘decisively’ with the terror-monger; the strong leaders, in turn, feel trapped by that temper and find themselves abandoning the tested virtues of moderation and mediation. Pakistan-based terrorists appear to have succeeded in making us jettison our own superior republican prudence and become very much like Pakistan.                **********IT is the bane of our times that everyone wants to play to the gallery. The Prime Minister has joined the crowd and has made his pronouncement about an end of the VVIP culture, as symbolised by the lal batti. In Punjab, the new Congress government is making a fetish of ‘lal batti gul.’ As if the so-called VVIP culture ends with the removal of lal batti or that the VVIP culture itself was at the root of the much larger crisis of governance. A letter to the Editor, from an excise and taxation inspector, in The Tribune (April 22) reminds us that there is much more to ‘government’ than a mere beacon. By the very definition, the ‘government’ represents the collective authority in a state or a country, and everyone exercises that authority in the name of the President. And, at times, it is absolutely imperative that this ‘authority’ be symbolised by an outward sign. The outward sign invokes awe in the citizen and fear in the culprit. A policeman is not a policeman without his uniform — nor, without his danda. And it is the danda that invokes fear among the criminals and confidence among the citizens. And that uniform gives the policeman the assurance that anyone messing with him would be deemed as challenging the iqbaal of the Indian state. All societies devise symbolism to separate the rulers from the ruled. A lal batti is only an outward symbol. While the lal batti does make an official, public or political, stand apart, it does not bestow upon him any unlicensed power. All authority needs to be exercised within the framework of rules and regulation. And this is what our civil society should be insisting upon rather than celebrating too much the removal of a beacon light.               ********** A few weeks ago, I was presented GS Cheema’s The Ascent of John Company — From Traders to Rulers (1756-1787). It turned out to be an absorbing read because it is a tale superbly told. In the very first few pages, Cheema sets the theme of his tale: the British were a bunch of outright looteras: “fraud and peculation is commonplace, while forgery, deceit, and brute force, are freely resorted to in the pursuit of wealth. Every European is there to make a fortune as fast as possible, and when an obstacle presents itself, it is ruthlessly crushed, often in connivance with the courts of justice.”The picture of the English character we get from Cheema is very, very unflattering. The Englishmen are shown as always in the hunt for “great windfall opportunities.” The Englishmen, for example, could have taken over the subhadaree of Bengal (including Bihar and Orissa) but preferred not to “because they preferred to extort presents from the prince they had sponsored, presents which could be explained away as the customary presents given by a prince to his supporters and well-wishers. If they had taken over the suba themselves, the Company would have insisted upon the right to audit the revenues of Bengal, and any such presents would have required the approval of the Court of Directors.” What ruthless greed from the presumed advance guards of enlightened civilisation. Later, Cheema cites Edmund Burke’s indictment at Warren Hastings’ impeachment trial as how Hastings had finessed the art of extorting money from hapless nawabs and the begums. Hastings would get an allowance of two hundred pounds a day on a visit from a host. Burke would thunder: “I believe that there is not a prince in Europe who goes to such expensive hospitality of splendour.” Cheema also gives a glimpse of the nature of the justice system the English had put in place: “The Zamindari or Faujdari Cutcherry dealt with criminal matters. The procedure was again summary, the punishment could be fine, imprisonment, hard labour in chains upon the roads for any length of time, even for life, and by flagellation, in capital cases, even to death. The nawabs would not permit the execution of a Muslim by hanging, that being regarded as too ignominious, but they had no objection to the offender being flogged to death. The whip, which is called the chabuk, was wielded by the executioners with such dexterity that a man could be killed with two or three strokes!”The Englishmen were the new nabobs. And, they lived it up. They could do it because they were, as Cheema puts it, “shaking the Pagoda Tree,” thinking of new ways of minting money, mostly illegally.Anyone reading this book would be left wondering at what time did the presumably superior Victorian virtues start asserting themselves? The picture of the English character we get is certainly at odds with that depicted in Philip Mason’s classic, The Men who Ruled India.               ********** AND lastly, perhaps the most amazing news of the week has to be the revelation that Serena Williams was eight-week pregnant when she recently won the Australian Open. This should put to rest more than one myth about female fragility.That calls for coffee, black and strong. Join me.

kaffeeklatsch@tribuneindia.com

 


Won’t be pressured, says Pak over Jadhav’s death sentence

Won’t be pressured, says Pak over Jadhav’s death sentence
Kulbhushan Jadhav was ”arrested” on March 3 last year by Pakistani security officials in Balochistan.

Islamabad, April 12

Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa said that they would “not come under any pressure” over executing former Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav, who has been sentenced to death for espionage, a media report said on Wednesday.

Chief of Army Staff General Bajwa met Sharif over the latest diplomatic flare up between India and Pakistan, amaa TV reported.

“They agreed not to come under any pressure” on the issue of Jadhav, the channel said, but gave no other details.

The two are also believed to have discussed Pakistan Army’s military preparedness and reviewed security, as well as discuss the situation prevailing at the border, Radio Pakistan reported.

This is the first meeting between the two since Bajwa took over as head of the army earlier this year.

The meeting comes days after the army chief sanctioned Jadhav’s execution after a military court held him guilty of spying, charges he, and India, deny.

The decision has sparked spark reaction from India and its leadership. In a statement issued in Parliament on Tuesday, Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj warned Pakistan that it should consider consequences of executing Jadhav and that India would take the execution of an “innocent Indian” as a “pre-meditated murder”.

India claims Jadhav was abducted and taken to Pakistan while he was in Iran, adding that the charges against him were concocted and the trial was “farcical”, leading to an “indefensible verdict”. PTI

 


Pathankot attack: NIA submits list of 39 witnesses

Tribune News Service

Mohali, April 10

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) today submitted a list of 39 witnesses in the Pathankot airbase attack case to be examined during trial in a special court in Mohali.Sources said the court had issued summons to one Vimal Kumar for his witness in the next hearing on May 2.The chargesheet in the case has named four accused, Maulana Masood Azhar, chief of the terrorist organisation Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), Mufti Abdul Rauf Asghar, deputy chief of JeM and brother of Maulana Masood Azhar, Shahid Latif, launching commander, and Kashif Jan, main handler of Pathankot attackers, all of Pakistan. A Red Corner Notice has already been issued by Interpol for the arrest of these terrorists.The accused, all Pakistan nationals, have been charged for offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Arms Act, 1959, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.


HEADLINES —10 APR 2017

BUGLERS BRING ALIVE SARAGARHI BATTLE

GOLDEN JUBILEE OF 11TH BATTALION OF THE GARHWAL RIFLES CM RAWAT FELICITATES EX-SERVICEMEN

12,000 KM TO PAY TRIBUTE TO MARTYRS RETD MAJ GENERAL PEDALLING TWO MINUTES EACH FOR 21,000 FALLEN SOLDIERS

ARMY TO REPLACE ANIMALS WITH ALL­TERRAIN VEHICLES

LINKING OF AADHAAR, PAN MADE EASY

HINDUISM AT RISK FROM RSS BY APOORVANAND

US AIR STRIKES SAY MORE ABOUT PUTIN-TRUMP TIES ROBERT FISK

‘WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF UDTA PUNJAB, WE NEED TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE NOW’