Sanjha Morcha

Ex-soldiers back Congress

New Delhi, Jan. 5: The majority of ex-servicemen associations have extended support to the Congress ahead of the Assembly elections in five states, giving a fillip to the beleaguered party particularly in Punjab and Uttarakhand that have lakhs of families with serving and retired soldiers.

Today, the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM) announced its support to the Congress, days after the Indian Ex-Servicemen League, a 4-lakh strong organisation recognized by an act of Parliament, and the Sanjha Morcha of Punjab did so. Ex-servicemen had supported the BJP in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections.

The IESM, led by Maj. Gen. (retired) Satbir Singh, addressed a joint news conference with Congress leaders Amarinder Singh, the Punjab unit chief of the party, and the chief ministers of Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, Virbhadra Singh and Harish Rawat, at the party headquarters in New Delhi and vowed to “expose” Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “betrayal” and his government’s “insensitivity” towards soldiers.

The IESM has 25,802 full-time members and is the most influential among such outfits. Though not a union of soldiers or officers, the IESM is an umbrella organisation that coordinates with various soldiers’ outfits.

Criticising the Prime Minister for not fulfilling his commitments on the one-rank, one-pension(Orop) scheme, Satbir Singh said: “We have been protesting at Jantar Mantar for 571 days and nobody from the government has come to talk to us. The government’s approach is shameful; it has humiliated soldiers, who sacrifice their lives for the country. We thought making an intervention in the elections is an option before us. We will educate people on the betrayal by the Modi government.”

While ex-servicemen play a significant role in Punjab and Uttarakhand, their belligerent posturing has the potential of affecting the BJP’s pet plank of robust nationalism built on the heroics of soldiers, including the chest-thumping over the “surgical strike” in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Amid chants of “shame, shame” by his colleagues, Satbir Singh said: “There is an old saying – ‘when a soldier has to go begging for his rights before the king, the king loses the moral right to rule’. Decorated soldiers are sitting on the road for 571 days, we knocked at every door, nobody listened.”

“Defence minister Manohar Parrikar once asked me: ‘Are you sitting there for money?’ I told him if a soldier is concerned about money, his body will not come back wrapped in the Tricolour. We live and die for the country, for dignity and honour. This government has gone back on its words, diluted the approved definition of Orop. We will expose them,” he added.

Amarinder Singh, a former Punjab chief minister and ex-serviceman who is fondly called Captain, hit out at the defence minister for his comments on the selection of the chief of army staff. “If Parrikar can’t keep his mouth shut on such matters, it’s time the PM chooses a man fit enough to look after our services, which are the last bastion of stability, secularism, and in whom the country across the board takes pride.”

Amarinder said an “ill-informed” defence minister was dangerous, adding that Parrikar should be aware that the services function according to a rank structure that indicates seniority and is adhered to by custom.

Parrikar said on Tuesday that intelligence inputs had also been considered while taking the decision on the appointment of the army chief.

The government has appointed General Bipin Rawat as army chief superseding two commanders – Eastern Army Commander Lt General Praveen Bakshi and Southern Army Commander Lt General P.M. Hariz. Parrikar has defended the decision, saying it was taken according to laid-down procedure.

Amarinder asked if the comments meant that intelligence inputs had cast aspersions on Generals Bakshi and Hariz. He said both were outstanding army commanders and soldiers of repute, and that “these foolish off-the-cuff remarks were an insult” to them.

The Congress leaders thanked the IESM for its support and promised to fight for soldiers’ demands. Amarinder announced a 21-point agenda for the welfare of defence personnel in Punjab. The agenda will be included in the Congress’s poll manifesto. The chief ministers of Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand too promised to adopt the agenda.

The agenda includes the establishment of an ex-servicemen cell, a separate department for ex-servicemen as guardians of governance, correct implementation of Orop, pay parity between the defence forces and Class A civil services and the removal of “anomalies” in the 7th Pay Commission.

पूर्व सैनिकों ने कांग्रेस के समर्थन का ऐलान किया

वन रैंक-वन पेंशन के मुद्दे पर 570 दिन से धरना दे रहे पूर्व सैनिकों के संगठन इंडियन एक्स सर्विसमैन मूवमेंट ने पांच राज्यों के विधानसभा चुनाव में कांग्रेस को समर्थन देने का ऐलान किया है। कांग्रेस ने भी पूर्व सैनिकों को वन रैंक-वन पेंशन की मांग को पूरा कराने के लिए केंद्र पर दबाव बनाने का आश्वासन दिया है।

पंजाब प्रदेश कांग्रेस कमेटी के अध्यक्ष कैप्टन अमरिंदर सिंह ने कहा कि पार्टी घोषणा पत्र में पूर्व सैनिकों के लिए कई योजनाओं का ऐलान करेगी। उत्तराखंड के मुख्यमंत्री हरीश रावत ने भी वादा किया कि सरकार पूर्व सैनिकों के कल्याण के सभी संभव कदम उठाएगी। उन्होंने पूर्व और मौजूदा सैनिकों के कल्याण के लिए समिति का गठन किया है। कोशिश है कि इन सैनिकों के परिवारों की समस्याओं को प्राथमिकता के आधार पर हल हो।

हिमाचल प्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री वीरभद्र सिंह ने भी पूर्व सैनिकों की मांग का समर्थन किया। एक्स सर्विसमैन मूवमेंट के अध्यक्ष सेवानिवृत मेजर जनरल सतबीर सिंह ने कहा कि कांग्रेस ने वन रैंक-वन पेंशन की लड़ाई में साथ देने का वादा किया है। इसलिए चुनावी राज्य सहित पूरे देश में कांग्रेस का साथ देंगे।

जनरल सतबीर सिंह ने केंद्र पर वादाखिलाफी का आरोप लगाते हुए कहा कि सरकार ने वन रैंक-वन पेंशन की परिभाषा बदली है। पूर्व सैनिक 14 जून 15 से राजधानी के जंतर-मंतर पर धरना दे रहे हैं। पर सरकार की तरफ से कोई पूछने नहीं आया।


Indo-Pak In 2017: Less Action At LOC; New Alliances In Afghanistan; BJP-PDP Need To Buckle Down by Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain

Indo-Pak In 2017: Less Action At LOC; New Alliances In Afghanistan; BJP-PDP Need To Buckle Down

SNAPSHOT

The year 2017 can at best be assessed to be a lower profile year than 2016 with little chance of resumption of any dialogue with Pakistan.

Meanwhile, the PDP-BJP alliance is likely to receive a reprieve in terms of time and this period must be exploited to the hilt in political outreach.

Much of Pakistan’s future India policy through 2017 will be based upon what transpired in 2016. Short term assessments are usually dangerous and trends become unpredictable, but risk based assessment is still essential.

The year 2016 saw Pakistan take its confidence up some notches. Some events drastically changed things for it, both in a positive and a negative manner.

First, on the positive side, Pakistan appeared to have turned the tide against terror after almost nine years. In 2015, post the massacre of children in Peshawar’s Army school, a renewed resolve emerged in Pakistan to go after the “bad terrorists”. This year, the number of terror related incidents reduced drastically and the security agencies achieved a semblance of control over Karachi. Rogue terror groups were targeted and their leaderships eliminated.

Second, Pakistan’s hold over the Afghan Taliban loosened considerably; it could not prevent the spring offensive for the second consecutive year although news of Taliban operations did not emerge in international media.

Third, the relationship with President Ashraf Ghani deteriorated, leading to the kind of remarks the latter made at the Heart of Asia Conference at Amritsar earlier this month.

Fourth, the relationship with China continued to blossom with the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) becoming the most important hinge around which the strategic relationship will revolve. Pakistan’s national confidence seemed to receive a boost.

Fifth, the US control over Pakistan reached a nadir and Russia’s overtures to Islamabad took observers by surprise.

Sixth and the most important development was Pakistan’s decision to change priorities after July and concentrate on Jammu & Kashmir. Pakistan may or may not have a hand in propping up Burhan Wani but it surely had an involvement in the uprisings post his encounter.

Pakistan’ military leadership probably felt that such a moment could not be allowed to pass. With J&K receiving full attention, a diplomatic offensive was launched in the UN and various major and minor capitals around the world. Using the old line of home grown terrorists attacking defence installations in Kashmir, Pakistan denied its own hand in the Uri terror attack and continued the game of denial even as surgical strikes were launched by India to target terror camps across the LOC.

The ceasefire of 2003 almost ceased to exist even as street turbulence and vigilantism continued through four months with an enhanced element of fervour being displayed by the mosques in the Valley.

In November end, Pakistan Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif retired and was replaced by Gen Qamar Bajwa. The line of control (LoC) went quiet even as Bajwa visited his erstwhile command, Pakistan’s 10 Corps which looks after Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The streets of Kashmir had already been witnessing the return of order and stability progressively through November once the seat of government shifted to Jammu.

Strangely, the Hurriyat also reportedly changed its strategy, inviting tourists to Kashmir and pilgrims to all religious sites in J&K and placing greater control over its own calendar. The silence in the Valley is only an ominous one because it’s yet uncertain whether it is due to loss of appetite or arrival at the conclusion that violence in the streets would not budge Indian authorities from their stand.

So what could 2017 be like in terms of India-Pakistan relations with special reference to J&K? Clearly among factors which dictate relations between estranged nations are the strategic environment, the immediate past, personalities at the helm, perceived strengths and weaknesses and payoffs from likely actions.

The strategic environment of 2017 is yet highly unpredictable with the onset of the new Administration, Trump’s personal lack of experience and his probable dependence on a clutch of high level ex military men as advisers. The start point is Afghanistan where Trump may be advised to continue US engagement for some more time to prevent the Taliban making greater progress. That automatically involves greater cooperative commitments from Pakistan, the key state which shares a boundary with Afghanistan, and has some influence (although just marginal) over the Taliban.

Recent reports suggest a Russia-China-Pakistan axis to work on accommodating Taliban as a tool against expansion of ISIS post the Aleppo-Raqqa-Mosul situation. Ignoring India and the US may well spur the US to pursue its interests and maintain or even enhance its presence in Afghanistan. If big power rivalry over the future of Afghanistan becomes a stronger reality through 2017, it could see Pakistan more intensely involved there.

When that happens, the intensity of focus towards J&K dilutes. In the priority, Afghanistan and the Taliban definitely score over J&K and the Hurriyat, which can wait for appropriate times. Sadly Pakistan too is aware that the Indian authorities will not get their act together in terms of placating and stabilising Kashmir. If this be the scenario, Kashmir may see some stability and less Pakistani energy dedicated towards it.

Pakistan is also acutely aware that 2016 was a year which involved greater risk in its ‘war by thousand cuts’ with India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s utterances on Baluchistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, PoK and the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) would also have sent signals of increasing threats to India’s level of tolerance, which is now under stress. The surgical strikes, bigger fire assaults and the increasing criticism against the Indian Army’s rear area security, all raised the costs for Pakistan.

Pakistan would have the choice to spread itself thin through simultaneous focus on J&K and Afghanistan or pursue a more proactive policy towards Afghanistan in conjunction with China and Russia to keep Indian and US influence under control. Any new campaign in J&K could be delayed with the presumption that not much may change and a policy of minimum action to keep the pot boiling may be employed.

The question is how much influence do Pakistan and the Hurriyat actually exercise? That remains the moot point because the new diffused leadership could just decide to resume where it left off last month. In that case, Pakistan would have little option but to grudgingly support and accept the risk. The latter could be calibrated by lowering the intensity of its actions and the utterances from time to time.

General Bajwa’s first 30 days of being quiet gives no indication of the approach he would like to follow. He can choose to bide his time till better opportunities arise, look for one or two mid profile actions which may not risk escalation or he could just reverse policy and do what Musharraf did in November 2003, that is start lowering the temperature and create conditions for a long drawn engagement in a peace process.

From the indicators available, the latter is the least likely because in Pakistan’s strategic circles, there appears a perception that the investment of 27 years in J&K may just be entering its pay off stage. A misreading of this kind is likely to be the cause of missing the opportunity and creating conditions for giving any kind of confidence to India that dialogue could be an option again.

For India, the public pressure to no longer absorb but rather respond in kind or even proactively take military action, has increased manifold. Fortunately, the political leadership remains extremely mindful of its larger responsibility and will not act brashly unless absolutely driven against the wall.

The year 2017, therefore, can at best be assessed to be a lower profile year than 2016 with little chance of resumption of any dialogue with Pakistan. Temperatures at the LoC will remain low unless provoked by another terror act from Pakistan’s soil. The Valley is still in fatigue and doesn’t seem ready for another full throttle agitation, but terror acts will continue especially against army convoys. One or two acts of terror in the Jammu region will necessarily take place to keep a balance north and south of the Pir Panjal.

The alliance of People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is likely to receive a reprieve in terms of time. It must act quickly to curb corruption, enhance accountability and provide governance which will make some positive difference to the lives of the people. If this period is counted as a window, it must be exploited to the hilt in political outreach.

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti has the ability to be uncomfortable while attempting to make others comfortable. This is what she must aim to do to get back that trust which people had in her. It’s been difficult stewardship of the chief minister’s office, but there is enough time to recover and get the act together.


Gen. Dalbir Singh retires after 43 years in service, Bipin Rawat to take charge

The Indian Army chief, General Dalbir Singh, retired today after 43 years in service. He will hand over the charge to General Bipin Rawat. The Indian Army chief, General Dalbir Singh, retired today after 43 years in service. He will now hand over charge to his successor, General Bipin Rawat….The Indian Army chief, General Dalbir Singh, retired today after 43 years in service.

He will now hand over charge to his successor, General Bipin Rawat.

“After 43 years of service to the nation I superannuate today. I salute the martyrs who made supreme sacrifices,” Dalbir Singh said after inspecting a Guard of Honour at the South Block lawns.

“The day I took over I had said that our response to any action will be more than adequate, immediate and intense. Indian Army is fully prepared and well trained to tackle any challenges be it external or internal,” he said.

(With inputs from IANS and ANI)

Why Lt General Bipin Rawat, man who led surgical strikes in Myanmar, is best suited to be Army chief

Top-level sources told India Today that Lt General Bipin Rawat was best suited to counter India’s main security challenge in the form of terrorism. He has 10 years of experience in counter-insurgency operations and even led the surgical strikes in Myanmar. With over ten years experience in counter-insurgency operations along.

and even led the surgical strikes in Myanmar.

With over ten years experience in counter-insurgency operations along the Line of Control, including leading the surgical strikes in Myanmar, the government chose Lt General Bipin Rawat to be the next Army chief and succeed General Dalbir Singh Suhag.

The Centre said Rawat was chosen as he was the best suited man to counter India’s main security challenge in form of terrorism.

“Rawat has 10 years of experience in counter-insurgency operations and was also posted on the Line of Control. He was involved in 1986 operations in Eastern Sector facing China and was also posted in Pulhama in the 19 Division,” senior government sources told India Today.

“In the current situation, we need a person with experience in the relevant area, that is operational experience,” the sources said.

ALSO READ | Congress questions Lt General Bipin Rawat’s appointment as Army Chief

THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT LT GENERAL RAWAT

In his career spanning over 38 years, Lt General Rawat has had “tremendous hands-on experience of serving in the combat areas, and at various functional levels in the Army”.

LT General Rawat has handled various operational responsibilities in many areas, including along the LoC with Pakistan, the LAC with China, and in the north-east.

According to Army officials known to him, Rawat is considered to have a balanced approach towards soldiering, and has compassion and connect with the civil society.

His experience as General Officer Commandng (GOC-in-C) Southern Army Command in Mechanised Warfare has focused towards the western borders, in coordination with the other two services.

“He was found the best suited among the Lt Generals to deal with the emerging challenges, including a reorganised and restructured military force in the north, continuing terrorism and proxy war from the west, and the situation in the north-east,” the sources said.

..

Government may assign post at par with Army chief to superseded Lt Gen Praveen Bakshi

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is expected to speak to Bakshi and the other superseded officer, Southern Army Commander Lt Gen PM Hariz, to examine issues of seniority in the force. The government may assign Lieutenant General Praveen Bakshi, who has been superseded for the post of Army chief, a position…The government may assign Lieutenant General Praveen Bakshi, who has been superseded for the post of Army chief, a position of similar stature to be created soon, sources told Mail Today on Tuesday.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar is expected to speak to Bakshi and the other superseded officer, Southern Army Commander Lt Gen PM Hariz, to examine issues of seniority in the force days after Lieutenant General Bipin Rawat’s elevation as Army chief. The appointment of Rawat, a counterinsurgency specialist, raised eyebrows among opposition parties because he was given the job ahead of two more senior candidates.

The ruling BJP has retaliated by accusing rivals of “politicising” defence matters. The last time the senior-most officer of the army was superseded for the appointment was in 1983, when Gen AS Vaidya took over instead of Lt Gen SK SinhA

Also read: Political slugfest breaks out over Army chief’s appointment

Parrikar will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi by January for a presentation on creation of the post of permanent chairman of the chiefs of staffs committee (COSC) who would be responsible for tri-services issues such as procurement, training and futuristic planning for the military.

“Bakshi is a sound officer and is of very high intellect and capability. We would want to use his experience and intellect for the forces’ betterment” senior defence ministry sources said.

“He is a capable officer and still has seven-eight months left in service. He will be considered for the post along with other officers.” However, the sources clarified that Eastern Army Commander Bakshi, who met Parrikar on December 20, has not been given any assurance or promise as “lollypop” that he would be given the post for abiding by the government’s decision on Army chief.

Experience

Sources said during the meeting with the minister, Bakshi raised the issues related to adverse situation for officers from the armoured and artillery divisions in getting experience in counterinsurgency operations compared to those from infantry battalions.

On the matter of sorting out seniority issues between Rawat, Bakshi and Hariz, sources said Parrikar is likely to take up the subject with the Southern Army Commander on December 30. “The minister has already had a word with Bakshi and the indications are that he is not going to quit from the Army in wake of the decision,” the sources said.

In a major shakeup, the government announced on December 17 Lt Gen Bipin Rawat as the next Army chief, considering his experience in dealing with the country’s “biggest threat”- terrorism in Kashmir and the Northeast.

Sources said it was felt that Rawat was best suited for the job under the circumstances. On the government choosing Rawat over Bakshi, the sources said, “On a spinning wicket, a spinner would be chosen over a fast bowler and a seamer, but it doesn’t mean that those left out were bad bowlers in any way.” Rawat is from infantry while Bakshi and Hariz are from armoured regiments and the two have comparatively little experience in dealing with terrorism.

Rawat will take over as the Army chief on December 31, replacing General Dalbir Singh Suhag. Lt Gen Bakshi went on leave on Tuesday for the next few days, to Bhubaneswar, and is likely to join office after the New Year weekend.

Reform

Top ministry sources said the government’s decision to appoint Rawat ignoring the seniority criteria in the services will prove to be a reform as this will do away with factionalism. Earlier, based on date of birth and seniority, officers could figure out the next service chiefs five to six years in advance and coteries would start forming those in line of succession.

“Now nobody would be sure of their future and everybody would be giving their best in their commands for bagging the top job,” they said. Meanwhile, Western Air Commander air marshal SB Deo would be appointed as the next Vice Chief of Air Staff as the incumbent, Air Marshal BS Dhanoa, was named the next Air Force Chief.


Bad weather foils IAF bid to retrieve bodies from Gurez

Bad weather foils IAF bid to retrieve bodies from Gurez
Army personnel carry out rescue work in Mahazgund village of the Gurez sector. Tribune Photo

Majid Jahangir

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, January 28

It is a tough task for the Indian Air Force (IAF) pilots flying Mi-17 helicopters from Srinagar every morning to retrieve bodies of 14 soldiers from the Gurez area that has received seven-ten feet snow. The inclement weather has been compelling them to return to their base without any success.The bodies of the soldiers, who died in snow avalanches, are lying at battalion headquarters at Neeru in the Gurez valley and helicopters have made umpteen sorties to access the area but to no avail.“We have been trying to airlift the bodies of the soldiers to Srinagar, but due to bad weather it could not happen,” said Srinagar-based defence spokesman Col Rajesh Kalia. “Due to bad weather, no helicopter could take off on Saturday,” the he said.An Army officer said any plan to carry the mortal remains of the soldiers to their respective native places depended on transporting the bodies from Gurez.The Gurez valley in Bandipora district, over 150 km from Srinagar, remains cut off from the rest of the Kashmir valley for most part of the winter because of heavy snowfall. On January 25, in two avalanches in the Gurez sector close to the Line of Control (LoC), the Army lost 14 of its soldiers.The Army had identified the soldiers killed in Gurez avalanches as a Naib Subedar Aram Singh Gurjar of Karoli, Rajasthan; Havaldar Vijay Kumar Shukla of Murena, Madhya Pradesh; Naik Ajit Singh of Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Sepoy Azad Singh of Uttar Pradesh, Sepoy Devander Kumar Soni of Madhya Pradesh, Sepoy Elaverson B of Tamil Nadu, Sepoy Nagaraju Mamidi of Andhra Pradesh, Sepoy Samundare Vikas of Maharashtra, Sepoy Sandeep Kumar of Karnataka, Sepoy Sanju Suresh Khandare of Maharashtra, Sepoy Sundar Pandi of Tamil Nadu, Sepoy Sunil Patel of Gujarat and Craftsman Ankur Singh of Haryana.However, a helicopter was able to transport the body of Major Amit Sagar from Sonamarg in central Kashmir’s Ganderbal district, to Srinagar and an IAF aircraft later took the body to Delhi late on Saturday. Major Sagar died in a snow avalanche on January 25 at Sonamarg in Ganderbal on January 25.


Gen Bakshi cuts short leave after Parrikar’s message

Gen Bakshi cuts short leave after Parrikar’s message
Lt Gen Praveen Bakshi. — PTI file photo

Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 13

Lt Gen Praveen Bakshi, the Eastern Army Commander of the Indian Army, joined back his duties in Kolkata on Friday after cutting short his leave.The move comes after Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar sent across a stern message to Lt Gen Bakshi who had proceeded on a month-long leave on December 26 after he was superseded and General Bipin Rawat was appointed as Chief.The act of his taking leave after promising support to General Rawat had not gone down well with the Ministry of Defence.Lt Gen Bakshi will be attending the combined commanders conference slated in Dehradun on January 21, General Rawat today said at a press conference in New Delhi.


Post-surgical strikes, Lahore dreams fading into oblivion Promise on getting the border opened missing this poll season

Post-surgical strikes, Lahore dreams fading into oblivion
An old milestone on the Ferozepur-Lahore GT Road, reminiscent of the bygone era.

Anirudh Gupta

Ferozepur, January 11

For the past over four decades, ahead of every polling season, leaders across the political spectrum used to raise the pitch for “Border khula diyange (Borders will be opened)”, perhaps to allure the electorate in this border constituency that shares the international border with Pakistan.However, call it an aftermath of the trans-LoC “surgical strikes” and subsequent aggressive demeanours exhibited by forces on either side of the fence, this catchphrase, which was considered a “magic wand” for the people of this area, has been “missing” from political rhetoric during these polls.“Earlier, this slogan was exploited to the hilt by every candidate. However, none of the politicians is talking about it this time,” said Dr Tirath Garg, political observer.“Not that people don’t want this border to open anymore, but probably given the strained relations between India and Pakistan, the “netas” prefer not to raise any controversy over this sensitive issue,” he added.Till date, all promises to re-open this Hussainiwala-Lahore route for trade and transit, which was closed after the 1971 Indo-Pak conflict, have proved hollow, believes local residents. “Every time, the elections were on the anvil, the candidates used to talk about the need to reopen this border,” said Malwinder Sodhi, a local farmer. Sodhi recalls that before the onset of hostilities in 1971, this border was the lifeline for traders engaged in import-export business of dry fruit, vegetables and other commodities. Besides, local cinema halls used to attract a lot of Pakistani visitors.But the border’s sudden closure sounded a death knell for the economic prosperity of this region. Since then, the residents of this area have been clamouring for its re-opening. “The opening of this border can open floodgates of prosperity for lakhs of people of the Malwa belt, but suddenly the matter has been put on back-burner,” says advocate JS Sodhi. “After waiting for more than four decades, it seems ‘Lahore dreams’ are now fading into oblivion,” he added.


Ex-servicemen body to support Cong in assembly polls

New Delhi, Jan 5 (PTI) Congress today got a boost with a prominent ex-servicemen organisation lending support to it for the upcoming Assembly elections, alleging that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has done “precious little” for their welfare.

The Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement (IESM), which is spearheading an agitation for OROP implementation for last 571 days here, announced to support Congress in presence of PCC president Amarinder Singh and chief ministers of Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand Virbhadra Singh and Harish Rawat respectively.

Speaking at the AICC headquarters, IESM chairman Maj Gen Satbir Singh (retd), hit out at the Prime Minister for not fulfilling his promise of granting OROP to all soldiers and accused the government of changing the definition of OROP as spelt out by Congress-led UPA before it was voted out of power.

In an apparent dig at the Prime Minister, he quoted Chanakya to say the king is not worthy of respect if a soldier has to go to him to seek something for him or his family.

Insisting that IESM, which is a federation of ex-servicemens organisations all over the country, has agreed to back Congress in the poll-going states as also elsewhere in the country as the party leadership has agreed to a charter of demands on OROP and related issues for welfare of soldiers, Satbir Singh said.

“Congress has given its agreement on implementation of OROP… We fully support the Congress in all the state in these elections,” he said.

The League has also taken upon itself for educating people to cast vote to those who fulfill their assurances. “We will be with you if you dont break our assurances,” he said.

Amarinder Singh said most of the ex-service organisations throughout the country will be working together for the benefit of the Congress.

He said the movement entered its 571st day of protest at Jantar Mantar, on issues which they feel as ex-servicemen are vital for welfare of servicemen, like OROP, 7th Pay Commission and most importantly the downgrading of precedence of various ranks of the Army in relation to civilian counterparts.

“The last issue is the biggest thing. The Izzat of a serviceman is more important than anything else. These issues are not limited just to Punjab. But, is affecting everybody,” he said.

Amarinder said there is great strength in servicemen. “We have all come on the same stage to work for benefit of all,” he said.

“We have agreed to an ESM cell at the Chief Ministers Office and we have started a new department called Guardians of Governance,” the PCC chief said.

“This will be a paid organisation which will employ ex-servicemen down to village-level and monitor how funds are spent. We hope this will help us improve the governance of Punjab,” he said. (MORE) PTI SKC/SPG DIP


LEAVE SUPPORT: GEN BAKSHI OFF TILL JANUARY 26

THE DEFENCE MINISTER SAID IF SENIORITY WAS ONLY CRITERION THEN COMPUTER COULD HAVE SELECTED CHIEF ON BASIS OF DATE OF BIRTH

NEW DELHI: Barely a few days before the government named General Bipin Rawat as the new Army chief, Eastern Army commander Lieutenant General Praveen Bakshi proceeded on a month’s leave till January 26.

Bakshi was overlooked for the army chief ’s post despite being the seniormost but expressed full support to Rawat.

Defence minister Manohar Parrikar on Tuesday, however, said if seniority was the only criterion then a computer could have selected a service chief on the basis of date of birth and there was no need to follow the rigorous procedure spanning months. NEW DELHI: Eastern Army commander Lieutenant General Praveen Bakshi may have pledged “full support” to army chief General Bipin Rawat but there hardly seems any possibility for cooperation in the coming weeks.

Bakshi, who was overlooked for the army chief ’s post despite being the seniormost, has gone on leave till January 26. It is rare for army commanders to go on long leave, a senior officer said.

South Block sources confirmed to HT that Bakshi had sought and was granted onemonth leave.

Defence minister Manohar Parrikar on Tuesday said if seniority was the only criterion then the computer could have selected a service chief on the basis of date of birth and there was no need to follow rigourous procedure spanning months, analyse Intelligence Bureau reports of candidates or seek the approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.

“There would be no requirement of any Raksha Mantri, there would no requirement of Cabinet Committee on Appointment because then it is a computer job. Date of birth decides who becomes General,” he said.

The Kolkata-based Eastern Command is responsible for guarding the line of actual control, India’s undefined border with China. Bakshi went on leave on December 27, raising a few eyebrows as his junior Rawat replaced General Dalbir Singh as the army chief four days later.

An Eastern Command spokesperson said Bakshi was on leave for “personal reasons”.

The duration of Bakshi’s leave was not known till now. On the day Rawat took over as chief, Bakshi extended his “best wishes and full support” to him, ending speculation that he may resign.

January is one of the most important months in the army calendar as several important ceremonial functions take place in the month, ranging from Army Day (January 15) celebrations to investiture ceremonies to Republic Day-related functions.

On December 31, Bakshi told officers over video conference that he would continue to serve with “full professional sincerity.” In promoting Rawat, the government ignored the seniority principle and the claims of Lieutenant Generals Bakshi and PM Hariz to the top job.

Playing down the controversial supersession, Parrikar said all candidates considered for the army chief ’s post were equally competent and due procedure was followed in making the appointment.

He told reporters that the procedure laid down for selecting service chiefs nowhere said seniority was the norm.

Bakshi and Hariz were commissioned in December 1977 and June 1978, while Rawat joined the army in December 1978. But Rawat’s experience in Kashmir and the Northeast tipped the scales in his favour. After taking over as army chief, Rawat said he had worked with both officers, had respect for them and everyone would cooperate to strengthen the army.

Superseded Lt Gen Bakshi goes on 30-day leave till R-Day

 

THE DEFENCE MINISTER SAID IF SENIORITY WAS ONLY CRITERION THEN COMPUTER COULD HAVE SELECTED CHIEF ON BASIS OF DATE OF BIRTH

From page 01 NEW DELHI: Eastern Army commander Lieutenant General Praveen Bakshi may have pledged “full support” to army chief General Bipin Rawat but there hardly seems any possibility for cooperation in the coming weeks.

Bakshi, who was overlooked for the army chief ’s post despite being the seniormost, has gone on leave till January 26. It is rare for army commanders to go on long leave, a senior officer said.

South Block sources confirmed to HT that Bakshi had sought and was granted onemonth leave.

Defence minister Manohar Parrikar on Tuesday said if seniority was the only criterion then the computer could have selected a service chief on the basis of date of birth and there was no need to follow rigourous procedure spanning months, analyse Intelligence Bureau reports of candidates or seek the approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.

“There would be no requirement of any Raksha Mantri, there would no requirement of Cabinet Committee on Appointment because then it is a computer job. Date of birth decides who becomes General,” he said.

The Kolkata-based Eastern Command is responsible for guarding the line of actual control, India’s undefined border with China. Bakshi went on leave on December 27, raising a few eyebrows as his junior Rawat replaced General Dalbir Singh as the army chief four days later.

An Eastern Command spokesperson said Bakshi was on leave for “personal reasons”.

The duration of Bakshi’s leave was not known till now. On the day Rawat took over as chief, Bakshi extended his “best wishes and full support” to him, ending speculation that he may resign.

January is one of the most important months in the army calendar as several important ceremonial functions take place in the month, ranging from Army Day (January 15) celebrations to investiture ceremonies to Republic Day-related functions.

On December 31, Bakshi told officers over video conference that he would continue to serve with “full professional sincerity.” In promoting Rawat, the government ignored the seniority principle and the claims of Lieutenant Generals Bakshi and PM Hariz to the top job.

Playing down the controversial supersession, Parrikar said all candidates considered for the army chief ’s post were equally competent and due procedure was followed in making the appointment.

He told reporters that the procedure laid down for selecting service chiefs nowhere said seniority was the norm.

Bakshi and Hariz were commissioned in December 1977 and June 1978, while Rawat joined the army in December 1978. But Rawat’s experience in Kashmir and the Northeast tipped the scales in his favour. After taking over as army chief, Rawat said he had worked with both officers, had respect for them and everyone would cooperate to strengthen the army.

 

clip