Sanjha Morcha

Suspicious movement at border; alert sounded in Pathankot

Tribune News Service

Pathankot, March 3

The BSF, working on specific inputs, sounded an alert in Pathankot district following reports that 3-5 persons were spotted “extremely close” to the international border, also called the Zero Line, on the Pakistani side.A Shreenivasan, DIG, Gurdaspur sector, confirmed that an alert had been sounded.“We received some specific reports from our Jalandhar office following which we are working on the inputs,” he said. Today’s high alert comes after weeks of relative calm in the area.The BSF also sounded the Pathankot police in the morning today following which the police went into overdrive, sealing the Narot Jaimal Singh area.Terrorists who were responsible for the January 2 Pathankot Air Force station and the July 27 (last year) Dinanagar police station attacks are said to have sneaked in through the Bamial area. Bamial falls under the Narot Jaimal Singh police station of Pathankot police district.Pathankot SSP RK Bakshi said, “All the villages near the border have been sealed and checking has been intensified.”The last threat received was on January 6 when some terrorists were spotted by villagers near Tibri Cantonment following which Gurdaspur SSP Gurpreet Singh Toor asked the administration to call in the Army.Two days later, the BSF and CRPF also joined the mega search operation. However, nothing tangible came out of the exercise even as the authorities extended their search towards the Dera Baba Nanak area falling under the Batala police district.Police check posts have been set up at various places on the roads leading to Bamial. In the last three months, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) sent at least three alerts to the Punjab Police and the Border Security Force (BSF) on a possible infiltration attempt, with detailed inputs including the number of terrorists, according to sources.


Lieut Gen Balwant Negi visits Roorkee, Raiwala formations

Lieut Gen Balwant Negi visits Roorkee, Raiwala formations
Lieut Gen Balwant Singh Negi, Army Commander, Central Command, with fellow officers, after witnessing an exercise at Purkazi, near Roorkee, on Wednesday. Tribune photo

Tribune News Service

Dehradun, March 2

Lieut Gen Balwant Singh Negi, Army Commander, Central Command, visited formations of Central Command at Roorkee and Raiwala today and witnessed combat engineering training undertaken by Surya Combat Sapper Formation at Purkazi.Lieut Gen Negi reviewed the collective training wherein all combat Sapper specialist units train together to hone their skills by physical execution on ground. He witnessed the complete range of multi-faceted training of mechanical mine breaching using trawl tanks, mechanical dry launch and wet bridging capable of sustained tank traffic and associated myriad activities.Lieut Gen Negi stressed the need to maintain the highest standards of operational preparedness. He commended the Sappers for their ‘josh’ and ‘hard work’ and exhorted them to uphold the glory of the Indian Army.At Roorkee, Lieut Gen Negi visited the Bengal Engineer Group and Centre where he was briefed about training activities, welfare measures for veterans and coordination and liaison of the centre with the civil authorities for internal security duty, including flood relief and response to anti-national elements. He held a windshield tour of the centre and saw the training infrastructure. He appreciated the modern infrastructure of the Hajipir Auditorium, Sainik Institute and the automated cook house for recruits at the centre.At the Raiwala military station, Lieut Gen Negi visited the Army formation. He was briefed on all aspects of operational readiness, training and welfare. He appreciated the cleanliness drive undertaken as part of the ‘Swachh Bharat campaign, yoga training for Army personnel in cooperation with Dev Sanskriti University and the efforts of the formation towards welfare of the veterans and veer naris in the region.Lieut Gen Negi also carried out an aerial reconnaissance of the areas of western Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.


Action on terror more important: India to Pak

Action on terror more important: India to Pak

Simran Sodhi

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, March 2

India today made it clear that action against terror by Pakistan would take priority over any diplomatic activity with it in the aftermath of the Pathankot airbase attack.This was stated today by Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar at the Raisina Dialogue in response to a question. “In the aftermath of a terror attack, if you ask me what do you give priority to, a terrorist attack or a diplomatic dialogue, I think the answer should be obvious,” he said.He said India had been saying for a while now that both India and Pakistan continued to be in touch, especially through the National Security Advisers (NSAs) since the Pathankot terror attack.India has blamed Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) for the Pathankot strike and has handed over evidence to Pakistan to prove its case. It is also demanding action against the JeM leader Masood Azar. Pakistan has formed an SIT and promised action, but not much has happened in terms of real action on the ground.On the context of improving ties with Pakistan, he said India was for a “much more modern relationship” with Islamabad. “I think there was a need to have change in attitude towards a number of issues of which terrorism is a central one,” he said.“It takes two hands to clap and that India would like to have same kind of ties with Islamabad like with other neighbours. We need to remove obstacles which are coming in between India and Pakistan. Most people in this country want to treat Pakistan as a normal neighbour,” Jaishankar said.Meanwhile, in Washington DC, Sartaj Aziz, the foreign policy adviser to PM Nawaz Sharif said Pakistan was “anxiously awaiting” the FS talks between the two countries to take place.


Indian consulate in Afghanistan attacked, 4 militants killed All Indians safe, says MEA

Afghan security personnel keep watch at the site of an attack in front of the Indian consulate in Jalalabad on March 2, 2016. — AFP

Jalalabad/New Delhi, March 2

India’s Consulate in Afghanistan’s Jalalabad city was attacked on Wednesday with a suicide bomber blowing himself up during the terror strike but all Indians at the mission were safe, Indian foreign office said.

One local staff sustained minor injuries in the attack, nearly two months after a similar assault was carried out by terrorists on the Indian mission in Mazar-i-Sharif in January.

“Indian Consulate in Jalalabad has been attacked. One suicide bomber blew himself up in front of the mission. All Indians in the mission are safe, while a local staff has sustained minor injuries,” External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Vikas Swarup said in New Delhi.

The Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) fired after they detected some movement and gunfire near the consulate complex at about 1:30 pm IST, according to officials.

On January 3, heavily-armed terrorists carried out an attack on the Indian mission in Mazar-e-Sharif which lasted for over 25 hours with all the attackers who attempted to storm the building getting killed by the Afghan security forces.

Soon after that also in January, Islamic State jihadists claimed responsibility for a deadly gun and bomb siege targeting the nearby Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad.

Afghan forces have killed four militants involved in the attack. However, an exact number of attackers was not immediately known.

The combing operation is on after the attackers were killed, sources said.

No group has claimed responsibility for the attack. — PTI


Politicians, military leadership failed army during ’62 war: General VK Singh

No one across the world can match our brave soldiers provided they are trained and equipped well. GENERAL VK SINGH, former army chief

From page 1 CHANDIGARH: Former Army Chief and Union minister of state of external affairs (independent charge) General VK Singh, during a seminar on ‘1962 War: An Appraisal’, organised by the department of defence and national security studies at Panjab University on Saturday, said the political establishment and the higher military leadership failed the soldiers during the 1962 India-China War.

KARUN SHARMA/HTStudents during a seminar on ‘1962 War: An Appraisal’ at Panjab University in Chandigarh on Saturday.Singh added, “It was a war in which the soldiers performed very well. What failed us because of the political establishment and the higher military leadership… why we failed is something that we need to analyse.”

“No one across the world can match our brave soldiers provided they are trained and equipped well. We created a myth about 9 feet tall and 9 feet wide Chinese man, who could have been defeated anytime. I believe the people who do not learn from the history suffer subsequently,” he added.

During the event, a book, ‘1962 The War That Wasn’t’, written by Shiv Kunal Verma, filmmaker and military historian, was also released. Describing the book as very refreshing, Singh said, “A myth was spread after the independence that the military was keen to get into the power. It was one of the reasons the military was kept out of the loop of decision making, which diminished the trust that should have existed between the political leaders and the military establishment.”

Meanwhile, Shiv Kunal Verma said while signing the Panchsheel Agreement, India made concessions to China, which was against the advice given by the military leadership. He added, “The then PM Jawaharlal Nehru committed a biggest blunder by handing over the North East Frontier Area to the Indian Army, which triggered a chain reaction.”

PU vice-chancellor Prof Arun Kumar Grover called upon the department of defence and national security studies to reach out to the military leadership and veterans and create a think tank, which can work on the defencerelated problems pertaining to the country.

Meanwhile, the 1962 War veteran Major General Rajender Nath, who was Second Lieutenant during the 1962 War, Brigadier Amarjit Singh Behl, war veteran, and Brigadier DK Khullar also shared their memories.


N Korea threatens US, S Korea’s Park with ‘miserable end’

Seoul, March 23

North Korea threatened a “miserable end” for South Korea’s president and her American allies today, in its latest colourfully worded attack.

Pyongyang declared it would wage a “retaliatory battle of justice” against Park Geun-Hye, with its artillery units standing ready to turn her office into a “sea of flames and ashes”.

“What the DPRK warns is not hot air. It will be clearly proved by the miserable end the US and the Park group will meet while going reckless,” said the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea (CPRK), using the formal name for North Korea.

The latest volley comes as Seoul and ally Washington stage their annual Key Resolve and Foal Eagle military drills, which this year are the largest ever, in the wake of a recent North Korean nuclear test and long-range rocket launch.

The massive drills — which include air strike exercises targeting key facilities in the North — are a “thrice-cursed provocation” against Pyongyang’s leadership, the CPRK said, according to the KCNA news agency.

In recent weeks, Pyongyang has maintained a daily barrage of nuclear strike threats against both Seoul and Washington over the drills it sees as a provocative rehearsal for invasion.

Tensions have been running high since the North carried out an atomic test in January, followed by a long-range rocket launch that was widely seen as a disguised ballistic missile test.

The UN Security Council responded by slapping its toughest-ever sanctions on the North for violating UN sanctions that ban the isolated state from conducting any ballistic missile test.

In an apparent show of anger, the North has launched a series of short-range and medium-range missiles into the sea off its east coast since last week.

Cross-border ties are at their lowest in years, with the conservative Park maintaining her hardline stance towards the impoverished but nuclear-armed North.

She warned last week Pyongyang was moving on a path of “self-destruction” as leader Kim Jong-Un ordered a nuclear warhead test, in a move that further raised tension. — AFP


Notice on soldier’s bail plea highlights problems in AFT Act

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, March 21

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice to the Central Government after the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) rejected the bail plea of a soldier who was awarded 10-year rigorous imprisonment by a court martial for his alleged role in the office-jawan clash at Nyoma in 2012.The notice has focused attention on provisions of the AFT Act and some recent judgments on it thereof, which have restricted the remedial measures available to armed forces personnel to appeal against orders passed by the AFT. A larger Bench of the Supreme Court is adjudicating on the issue and the matter is pending for settlement.Though the petitioner’s appeal was pending before the Armed Forces Tribunal, he was denied bail despite being in detention for more than three-and-a-half years. He has contended that the AFT Act specifically bars an appeal against interlocutory or interim orders passed by the Tribunal, even to the Supreme Court and bail being an interlocutory order, there is no option but to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.Though the High Courts were granting relief till March 2015 to soldiers and ex-servicemen aggrieved by the AFT’s orders, this stopped after an SC order, which stated that since an appeal was provided to the Supreme Court under the AFT Act, final orders of the Tribunal should only be challenged before the apex court only.The situation caused a problem as it rendered litigants remediless because there was a statutory bar under Section 31 of the AFT Act in approaching the Supreme Court except in matters involving a ‘point of law of general public importance’.While civilians had a 3-tier appeal mechanism comprising the lower courts, high courts and the SC, the Armed Forces Tribunal became the first and last court for the defence community.It has been averred in the bail petition that since the Armed Forces Tribunal Act provides no scope of appeal for interim and interlocutory orders passed by the AFT and that even the Union of India has been approaching the High Courts against such orders.

SC ruling leaves litigants with no option

  • The AFT Act bars an appeal against interlocutory or interim orders passed by the Tribunal, even to the SC and bail being an interlocutory order, there is no option but to approach the HC
  • Though the HCs granted relief till March 2015 to soldiers and ex-servicemen aggrieved by the AFT’s orders, this stopped after an SC order, which stated that since an appeal was provided to the SC under the AFT Act, final orders of the Tribunal should only be challenged before the SC
  • This rendered litigants remediless as there was a statutory bar under Section 31 of the AFT Act in approaching the SC except in matters involving a ‘point of law of general public importance’

AFT’s denial of bail to soldier: HC notice to Centre

MOHAMMAD WAS AWARDED 10-YEAR JAIL BY A COURT MARTIAL FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN SLOGANEERING DURING THE LEH CLASH INCIDENT OF MAY 2012

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has issued a notice to the Centre after the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) rejected the bail plea of a soldier, Naseer Mohammad. Mohammad was awarded 10-year jail by a court martial for his alleged involvement in sloganeering during the Nyoma (Leh) officer-jawan clash incident of May 2012.

He was denied bail by the tribunal despite being in detention for more than three and-ahalf years.

The AFT Act specifically bars an appeal against interlocutory or interim orders passed by the tribunal, and the bail being an interlocutory order, there was no option but to approach the high court, the petitioner had argued in his appeal. The bench of justice Mahesh Grover and justice Lisa Gill has issued notice to the Centre for May 19 seeking its response.


Choosing optics over outcomes

The government’s Pakistan policy seems to be based on whims and is devoid of a real framework, writes JYOTIRADITYA SCINDIA

The Modi government has recently warmly welcomed and rolled out the red carpet for a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) from Pakistan to come and investigate the Pathankot airbase attacks. On the subject of export of terror to India, India has always maintained that there is no distinction between the activities of State and non-State actors in Pakistan and the latter are only used as a proxy by the Pakistani establishment (mainly the army and ISI) to further its agenda of targeting India. Now, by callously inviting the Pakistani JIT to India, the government has played right into the hands of the Pakistani establishment, which conveniently offers “non-State actors” as an excuse for its export of terrorism to India. Past Indian governments have worked extremely hard and had succeeded in pushing Pakistan into a corner, by diplomatically asserting that the Pakistani State is an active abettor of terror rather than purely victim to it. The recent actions of the Modi government have washed away years of this effort and effectively dismantled the box that Pakistan was caged in; the invite to the Pakistani JIT, which includes an ISI member, is tantamount to giving it a clean chit on terror incidents.

PIBPrime Minister Narendra Modi, who, before the elections, used to talk about showing ‘red eyes’ and loudly condemned writing ‘love letters’ to Pakistan, has today adopted the ‘pappi-jhappi’ doctrine to win over his Pakistan counterpart Nawaz SharifWhat is even more damning is that India is yet to get a Letter Rogatory (LR) — a request from a court to share evidence to help investigations — from Pakistan. In the absence of this letter, any evidence collected by the JIT could easily be challenged in a court of law and may not even enjoy judicial admissibility in Pakistan. So, while India may hand over conclusive proof of Maulana Masood Azhar’s and the JeM’s involvement in the Pathankot attack to the JIT, it may be de-linked from the judicial process against them in Pakistan, effectively beating the entire purpose of the said investigation. The Indian government has claimed to have received assurances from the Pakistani authorities about the non-requirement of the LR, but by accepting Pakistan’s explanation, India is being absolutely careless and not according the technicalities of another country’s judicial procedures the seriousness they deserve. This episode is but one example of the Modi government’s dismal policy vis-à-vis Pakistan, which has been marked by the absence of farsightedness, complete non-transparency and flip-flops.

Cross-border infiltration and terrorism have an unfortunate pattern of rearing their ugly heads whenever any high octane engagement is undertaken by India and Pakistan — the Lahore declaration under the earlier BJP government was followed by the Kargil War and PM Narendra Modi’s stopover in Lahore to attend PM Nawaz Sharif ’s birthday and his granddaughter’s wedding resulted in Pathankot. This government has conveniently chosen to emphasise optics over outcomes when it comes to its Pakistan policy. There is absolutely no framework for engagement with Pakistan and decisions seem to be made spontaneously and on a whim. Pakistan is yet another example of the BJP’s post-election U-turns and its penchant for managing headlines over managing policy. The same Modi who, before the elections, used to talk about showing “red eyes” and loudly condemned writing “love letters” to Pakistan, has today adopted the “pappi-jhappi” doctrine to win over Sharif. Sushma Swaraj, then leader of the Opposition and now external affairs minister, who used to forcefully demand suspension of talks with Pakistan until their “aatankvaad ke thikaane” were destroyed, now refers to the Indian PM’s surprise visit to Pakistan as “statesman-like”, tweeting “Padosi se aise hi rishte hone chahiyen”.

Even after coming to power, the U-turns and flip-flops haven’t ceased. The main conspirators of the Mumbai attacks have not been brought to justice, Pakistani diplomats have not stopped meeting the Hurriyat leaders, there have been close to a 1,000 ceasefire violations since the government took office and there have been repeated terror strikes in Jammu and Punjab — killing three in Kathua (March 2015), seven in Gurdaspur (July 2015), seven in Pathankot (January 2016) and five in Pampore (February 2016). What is the BJP’s, and more importantly the government’s, position on Pakistan? Is it “talks and terror can’t go together” or “the two countries will talk only if they have to discuss terror and not Kashmir” or “the perpetrators of 26/11 and Pathankot should be brought to justice before we talk” or “any third party involvement with the Hurriyat is where we draw the red line”? Alternatively, is Modi’s Pakistan policy based on exchanging saris and shawls with the Pakistan PM, and visiting Pakistan to wish him on his birthday and attend his granddaughter’s wedding? The country needs to know, the Opposition needs to know and perhaps, most importantly, ministers in the government need to know.

India needs to negotiate from a position of strength — that means we must decide not just when and where we talk to Pakistan, but also what we talk about. The Congress has always advocated peaceful, but results-oriented, negotiations to settle all disputes with Pakistan and dealt with the situation skilfully and sensitively when in power. It made sure Parliament and the Opposition were always taken into confidence and the media periodically briefed through a single channel of communication. Now what we have is absolute mayhem and confusion — even the senior-most ministers of the government are unaware of the PM’s visit to Pakistan, the visit of the Pakistani JIT and whether or not the JIT will be provided access to the Pathankot airbase. The desire for media attention and personal glory seems to have superseded national interest to yield foreign policy that is directionless, toothless and ineffective.


Hint of duress in Pak video of ‘spy’

NEW DELHI: India rejected a man’s purported video confession that Pakistan peddled on Tuesday to reaffirm its allegations about detaining an Indian naval officer for espionage and encouraging terrorist activities in Balochistan and Karachi.

AFP PHOTOPakistani Lt General Asim Bajwa (left) gives details about alleged spy Kulbhushan Yadav in Islamabad on Tuesday.Pakistani military spokesman Lt General Asim Bajwa began a media briefing with a six-minute video of the “Indian spy”, who makes a series of comments that match Islamabad’s allegations about India fuelling a separatist movement in Balochistan and inciting violence in financial capital Karachi.

The video features multiple quick edits and the audio appears to go out of sync from time to time, which hint that it was shot under duress.

India repeatedly denied both charges, saying the official took premature retirement from the navy and has nothing to do with the government.

The Indian foreign ministry said the man, identified as Kulbhushan Yadav, was harassed while operating a legitimate business from Iran.

“While we probe this aspect further, his presence now in Pakistan raises questions, including the possibility of his abduction from Iran,” it said and asked Pakistan to grant consular access to Yadav.

The man’s statements “clearly indicates tutoring”, the foreign ministry said and, hence, “We are naturally concerned about his wellbeing in these circumstances.”

The footage shows the man saying he began working as an intelligence recruit after the attack on 2001 Parliament in New Delhi in which nine people were killed. He apparently set up a small business in Iran that provided him cover for frequent trips to Pakistan before becoming an agent for Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) — India’s external intelligence agency — in 2013.

He says he was caught trying to cross into Pakistan from Iran on March 3.

“Kulbhushan Yadav is a serving Indian naval officer whose primary mission was to foment terrorism in Karachi and Balochistan,” Lt General Bajwa said. “He converted to Islam and worked at Gadani under the cover of a scrap dealer.”

But there is no proof that the retired navy officer was detained in Balochistan, India had countered.

Yadav owns a small ship and used to carry cargo from ports in Iran to various destinations, sources told PTI. He could have been detained after he strayed into Pakistani waters and was being wrongly charged.


Defence strategy experts need of the hour, says ex-Army chief

Defence strategy experts need of the hour, says ex-Army chief
Union Minister of State for External Affairs Gen VK Singh (second from left) with VC Prof AK Grover and other dignitaries at Golden Jubliee Hall, PU, in Chandigarh, on Saturday. Tribune photo: Manoj Mahajan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, March 26

Indian universities should produce experts in defence strategic studies to guide military personnel not to repeat their old mistakes if any war is fought in the future. Former Army chief and Union Minister of State for External Affairs and Statistics and Programme Implementation (Independent Charge) Gen V K Singh stated this while addressing a seminar on ‘1962 War: an Appraisal’ at Panjab University here today. The event also marked the book release of “1962 The War That Wasn’t” by Shiv Kunal Verma.Referring to the PU Defence Studies Department where courses related to the strategic studies was going on, he said such departments were the need of the hour. He said in other developed countries special departments were created by the government so that specialisation and analysis of history and wars of the country could be done to understand the loopholes. This was done so that their soldiers did not repeat such mistakes in future wars. But in India, defence studies meant what we learn in NCC and nothing else, he said. During his address, he said those who did not learn from history suffered a lot in future.Referring to the 1962 war, he appreciated the courage of the Indian soldiers and said they performed well but the defeat was due to political establishment and leadership at the top of the military which lacked in taking the right decision at the right time. He stressed upon analysing the situation of 1962 war to learn what went wrong so that it should not be repeated by the military in the future.Clarifying the myth that after Independence,  the military was keen to go on war to show their might to the neighbours, he said during the 1962 war, military was not taken into confidence by political heads before taking a final call on the war. The political establishment cheated the military by not actively consulting it.Meanwhile, filmmaker and military historian Shiv Kunal Verma who authored the book “1962 The War That Wasn’t” mentioned that while signing the Panchsheel Agreement, India made concessions to China which was against the advice given by the military leadership. PU VC Prof Arun Kumar Grover called upon the Department of Defence and National Security Studies to reach out to the military leadership and retired military officers and create a think tank.  Gen Kulwant Singh, Maj Gen Rajendar Nath, Brig Amarjit Singh Behl and Brigadier DK Khullar also shared their views.The 1962 war veterans Maj Gen Rajendar Nath, Brigadier Amarjit Singh Behl and Brig DK Khullar were also present. They were given standing ovation by the audience.