Sanjha Morcha

OROP- The Great Betrayal  

My Photo
I think it’s time now that we term OROP – One Rank, One Pension, as APAB – A Promise and Betrayal.
Betrayal seems to have become a habit with the present regime. The Prime Minister betrayed the people of India in his promise for repatriating the nation’s money illegally stashed away in off shore banks and now he has betrayed our great and loyal armed forces in his promise regarding judicious implementation of One Rank One Pension.
I am a much saddened man today, and I cannot understand why our great leader, who was beloved of the masses, beloved of the defence community of India, has decided to betray them so cruelly.
I recall that after Narendra Modi’s nomination as Prime Minister on September 11, 2013, at his first election rally in Riwari in Haryana on September 15, he assured the defence forces of his support to implement One Rank One Pension. This promise was continuously repeated at several other election rallies across the country. In fact it was the repetition of this promise, and the trust that the defence community placed in Modi, that compelled the then Finance Minister Chidambaram to include the OROP in his February 2014 budget, and make a token allocation of Rs 500 crores for it. Of course, they did nothing about it.
Resting on their hopes, the ex servicemen community contributed very significantly to the BJP victory especially in North India, where most of them reside – Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Delhi, and of course UP, which has the largest number of ex-servicemen in the country.
Even over the last one month, the nation has witnessed the daily mortal risk faced by members of our defence forces, and the sacrifice demanded from them for defending our country. So that we can then sit back in our comfortable chairs and pass judgement about what went wrong or right. Just in the last one month, we have seen tragic loss of life of our brave soldiers in Pathankot, in Siachin, and at the J&K Line of Actual Control, something that has become a recurring event.
And we acknowledge and reward the sacrifice of our brave and patriotic soldiers by betraying the promises that were made to them by our political leaders.
Details of the OROP had been well defined in the Koshiyari Committee Report, 2012, which had been placed before Parliament and been unanimously approved. The NDA Government confirmed this definition in Parliament in 2014. Jaitley’s Budget of June 2014, continued with its assurance of implementing the OROP. Jaitley was then both Finance and Defence Minister, and the defence community was full of hope and expectation, thinking they would more speedily get their dues through a single window clearance.
But after the Budget announcement, a period of complete inertia set in, until Parrikar was appointed Defence Minister on November 9, 2014. The new Defence Minister held consultations with representatives of the defence organizations, and there was great satisfaction when in February 2015, he came out with a Draft Government Notification that satisfied the legitimate demands of the defence services. They eagerly awaited the implementation announcement in Jaitley’s next Budget of 2015.
But a shock was in store for them. The Budget of 2015 contained not a word about OROP or its implementation. There was disbelief and consternation among the ex-servicemen, and a sense of betrayal. And that is when the sad spectacle of the agitation by our brave and patriotic ex-servicemen started, which continues even today. Experts on statecraft, starting from Kautilya, Machiavelli to the present day state unequivocally that if a country’s army is turning on to an agitation mode, then something is dangerously wrong with the country’s body politic.
Parrikar sent his proposal to Jaitley’s Finance Ministry in February 2015, which hibernated, with the usual excuse that modalities are being worked out. Somewhere during this time, it is reported that the Prime Minister’s Office stepped in, and in September 2015, the hapless Parrikar read out an inconsequential statement (least expected from him, with all his experience and meticulousness) with a howler about VRS – the Voluntary Retirement Scheme – which is not even applicable to the armed forces! These were totally in variance with his own proposals of February 2015, and were made reportedly at the behest of the PMO.
Then started the ex-servicemen’s agitation and hunger strike in full force. And their ultimate humiliation and insult by the Delhi Police manhandling them and physically removing them from Jantar Mantar. I wonder if the Prime Minister is aware of the extremely negative impact this has had on the morale of serving soldiers, and that all news about the on-going agitation has been ordered to be blacked out in the Media, with not even paid advertisements being accepted by mainstream newspapers. This must have been the work of someone who manages these things. It is not difficult to find out who actually handled this shut out of news which must be known to the people.
In November 2015, the Government issued a notification regarding OROP, that was totally at variance with the definition of OROP, as approved by Parliament, or the pledge made by Modi during his election rallies.
Many injustices are evident in the notification –
1. Fixing the base year as 2013 as against 2014, (which swallows up their salary increment for one year), in violation of what had been accepted in Parliament in 2013 and 2014;
2. Averaging the pension for the rank between the maximum and minimum salary drawn in that rank, a purely subjective exercise, as against the definition accepted in Parliament that it must be determined as the same pension for the same rank for the same length of service;
3. Equalizing of pension every 5 years instead of it being done every year. This results in one rank – 5 pensions!
I’m sure the Defence Ministry, Finance Ministry and the PMO are aware that the fighting armed soldiers retire after 15-18 years of grueling service in the most inhospitable borders of our country, as against the non fighting soldiers who serve for longer tenures in more hospitable and more comfortable working conditions.
It is these fighting armed soldiers with shorter serving tenures and their widows who will be hit hardest, and most unjustly so, if the present formula of equalizing pension every 5 years instead of each year is implemented.
4. Finally, a one man Commission to sort out the anomalies of the package, without representatives from organizations of the armed forces, is not exactly a confidence inspiring measure. Would it not have been more convincing if the Commission was more like the Pay Commission and included the armed forces representatives as well?
I don’t know whether the Prime Minister is aware that our armed forces, patriotic and disciplined as they are, are getting bitter and disillusioned. The present Finance Minister lost to Amarinder Singh in the Amritsar Constituency by 94,000 votes. I am informed that the strength of ex-servicemen in that constituency is about 55,000, and with families, the figure would be the same that Jaitley lost by. Is that the reason for his grouse against the ex-servicemen, as is speculated?
Be that as it may, can anyone explain what the grouse of the Prime Minister against the ex-servicemen is?
I am not writing this piece without disclosing that by letters reproduced under I have communicated to the Hon’ble Prime minister my deep concern about this matter but obviously he is in no mood to respond at all.
Dear Prime Minister,
I do not enter into any correspondence with you for reasons which you know or can easily be given. But I with this in public interest and of course it involves some advice to you which you may not relish but my duty to the nation leaves me no option.
I was shocked day before that somebody whom you know was conveying to the nation his complaint against the three Army men who are in the forefront of the OROP agitation for compelling you to carry out your promise to the Army guys and their widows.
Your post election excuse for non performance of it is plainly not sufficient if not so ridiculous that it is already exposing you to public contempt.
I know that you think that you are infallible and all knowing. It is in my humble opinion an insane illusion.
During his television talks he shamelessly boasted that he would see three guys in jail. I wonder if you know that he had earlier moved the police with the same false complaint and the police rejected it. He has now been persuaded by some whom you know that the police will change their mind.
Dear Prime Minister please listens to what sensible citizens believe. They are convinced that the police is under corrupt pressure from your government. I am warning you that in every election you will encounter precisely public reaction of which you got a clear glimpse in Bihar.
This is an appeal from a humble citizen who was once your friend.
With utmost pain.
Sincerely Yours
Ram Jethmalani
Mr. Prime Minister, you cannot be that naive, that you are not able to see the designs of your trusted advisers plotting against you, who have brought you ignominy in Delhi and Bihar and now have succeeded in alienating you from the armed forces, who had placed implicit trust in you.
Take charge, eliminate your hidden enemies to whom you are giving a free hand, perform your dharma, and redeem your promise to the armed forces and ex-servicemen of our country.
You can still do it. Otherwise, you are plotting your own downfall.
Ram Jethmalani
born 14 September 1923, is an Indian lawyer and politician. He has served as India’s Union Law Minister and as Chairman of Bar Council of India. He has represented a sweep of cases from the high-profile to the controversial for which he has often faced severe criticism. He is the second highest paid Indian lawyer. Ram Jethmalani is known as a maverick lawyer with many distinctions to his credit. He obtained a law degree at an early age of 17 and started practising law in his hometown (in today’s Pakistan) until the partition of India. He married Durga Jethmalani and later, his second wife, Ratna Jethmalani. The partition led him to move to Mumbai as a refugee and he began his life afresh with his family. He has two sons and two daughters, of whom, Mahesh Jethmalani is a well known lawyer.

Two months on, Siachen martyr’s family awaits aid

CM had announced to bear study expenses of brother, Rs 10 lakh

Two months on, Siachen martyr’s family awaits aid
Sushma, mother of Capt Ashwani Kumar, with the martyr’s photograph at her house in Patiala. Tribune photo: Rajesh Sachar

Aman Sood

Tribune News Service,Patiala, February 14

Sacrifices made by bravehearts, promises to martyrs’ families by politicians, candlelight marches and debates on TV channels are forgotten as soon as the dust settles.The family of Regimental Medical Officer Capt Ashwani Kumar, who died in an avalanche at the Siachen glacier in November 2015, is struggling to make both ends meet, leave aside keep his name alive for future generation.Sixtysix-year old Anokhe Lal still recalls the last phone call he received from his son Capt Ashwani Kumar, in which they had discussed a few family matters, including studies of his younger brother.However, a week later, an avalanche struck a patrol party at the Siachen glacier on November 13. While 15 soldiers were rescued, Capt Ashwani could not be saved.Various politicians announced compensation and jobs for the kin, but there was no follow-up on promises.The promises made by the state government, including financial help of Rs 10 lakh and all study expenses of the martyr’s younger brother, are yet to be fulfilled.“Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal came to our house on November 21, gave a cheque for Rs 5 lakh and left promising more. Almost over two months since, we are not sure if we will get anything else,” said Lal, worried over his younger son’s future.To add insult to injury, the Patiala Municipal Corporation has ignored the claim of Capt Ashwani Kumar and instead named a road after a councillor who died in an accident on a holiday in HP.A road in Tripuri is now named after Paramjit Singh Dixie, the councillor who died in the road accident in 2014, while a park in Model Town is named after BJP rural president Ravinder Singh Ginny’s deceased father.“I am not bothered if everyone forgets my son’s sacrifices. At least we won’t. We would have been happy if a road would have been named after my son. My youngest son now wants to leave studies and start earning as there is no earning member in the family. Leave aside his education, the government should provide him a suitable job,” says his mother Sushma.All efforts to contact Patiala Deputy Commissioner Rambir Singh turned futile as he refused to take calls or reply to a detailed SMS sent on his mobile.Capt Ashwani Kumar (26), born on August 27, 1989, represented 3 Ladakh Scouts. He was a bachelor and hailed from Patiala. Kumar did MBBS from Government Medical College, Patiala, and was commissioned into the Army on January 6, 2015.


China warns against South China Sea patrols

82787258-0013-0002-1138-000012345678-1455282787517
short by Aarushi Maheshwari / 06:43 pm on 12 Feb 2016,Friday
China has said that nations “outside the area” must not militarise the South China Sea, after reports claiming India and US were considering conducting joint patrols in the region emerged. Meanwhile, US State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner reportedly said that there were no plans to conduct India-US joint maritime patrols in the South China Sea or the Indian Ocean.

Don’t militarise South China Sea: China tells India, US

  • Sutirtho Patranobis, Hindustan Times, Beijing
  • |

  • Updated: Feb 12, 2016 16:52 IST

A ship (top) of the Chinese Coast Guard is seen near a ship of the Vietnam Marine Guard in the South China Sea. China has reacted sharply to a report suggesting that the United States and India were planning joint patrols of the disputed South China Seas region. (REUTERS Photo)

China has reacted angrily to reports of possible joint patrolling by the US and India in the South China Sea, most of which is claimed by Beijing, saying the region should not be militarised by countries from “outside the area”.

Chinese officials took time out from the week-long national New Year holiday to warn the US and India against any naval patrolling in the disputed waters. They were responding to a media report that Washington and New Delhi had discussed joint patrols, including in the South China Sea.

China lays claim to most of the South China Sea but is locked in dispute with Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Brunei and Vietnam over the ownership of islands in the region.

“No cooperation between any countries should be directed at a third party,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Hong Lei said in an emailed statement to Reuters.

“Countries from outside the area must stop pushing forward the militarisation of the South China Sea, cease endangering the sovereignty and national security of littoral countries in the name of ‘freedom of navigation’ and harming the peace and stability of the region,” Hong said.

“We hope that the relevant parties speak and act with caution, refrain from intervening in the South China Sea issue, and especially avoid being manipulated by certain countries and ultimately harming their own interests.”

Read: India, US consider joint naval patrols in South China Sea

A US defence official told Hindustan Time that India and the US had held “informal discussions” on conducting joint naval patrols but no decisions had been made. The officials further said the South China Sea did not figure in those discussions, contrary to a Reuters report on Wednesday which said the two countries planned to start the patrols within the year.

Sources in the Indian defence ministry described the report as “highly speculative”. Indian officials also noted that the country had never conducted joint patrols with any country and there was no change in the government’s policy of joining an international military effort only under the UN flag.

China’s hackles were raised when the United States sent a missile destroyer to patrol in the South China Sea. China has always maintained that discussions surrounding the disputed maritime territory cannot involve third parties. (REUTERS)

Any mention of the South China Sea in international diplomacy triggers a sharp reaction from China, which says no country, other than those involved in the disputes, has the right to be involved.

China has become more assertive in the region and has been building airfields and increasing its naval presence.

When the September trilateral dialogue among the foreign ministers of Japan, India and the US mentioned the South China Sea, Beijing responded with a pointed statement to Hindustan Times.

“China enjoys indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha (Spratly) Islands and their adjacent waters as well as sovereign rights and jurisdiction over relevant seabed and subsoil,” the Chinese foreign ministry said in a written statement.

The response mentioned the “Five Persistence” policy followed by China. “…we have always adhered to the principle of “Five Persistence”, which stands for persistence in maintaining the peace and stability of South China Sea; persistence in settling disputes with the party concerned according to the international laws via bilateral negotiation based on respect for historical facts; persistence in relying on rule-based system to control disputes; persistence in sustaining the freedom of flight and navigation in South China Sea.”

 


Indo-Pak ties tense after Pathankot: US intel chief

Washington, February 10

The relations between India and Pakistan “remain tense” after the Pathankot terror attack and India’s engagement with Pakistan this year may depend on Islamabad’s willingness to take action against those linked to the incident, the US intelligence chief has said.“Relations between Pakistan and India remain tense despite the resumption of a bilateral dialogue in December,” James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, told the Senate Armed Services Committee.“Following a terrorist attack on Pathankot air base in India, which Delhi blames on a Pakistan-based group, India’s engagement with Pakistan will probably hinge in 2016 on Islamabad’s willingness to take action against those in Pakistan linked to the attack,” Clapper said during his testimony. State Department Spokesman John Kirby agreed with Clapper. — PTI


GOC-in-C’s maiden visit to military station concludes

BATHINDA: The two-day visit of Lieutenant General Sarath Chand, general officer commanding-in-chief, Sapta Shakti Command, to the military station here concluded on Tuesday.

HT PHOTOLieutenant General Sarath Chand, general officer commanding-in-chief, Sapta Shakti Command, meeting army officers in Bathinda on Tuesday.

LT GEN SARATH CHAND WAS APPRISED OF ISSUES OF ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL AND SHOWN FACILITIES CREATED FOR THEM

It was his maiden visit to the cantonment after taking over as army commander of the Sapta Shakti Command. General Chand and his wife Bindu Sarath Chand, who accompanied him during the visit, were accorded warm welcome by Lieutenant General DR Soni, general officer commanding, Chetak Corps, and his wife Suman Soni.

The GOC-in-C went around the military station and inspected the infrastructural development projects and amenities at the station to improve the quality of life of the soldiers as well as their families.

During the visit, the commander was also apprised of the issues of the armed forces personnel and shown the facilities created for them. He appreciated the staff for an exemplary display of professionalism.

His wife, who is president of the Army Wives Welfare Association, Sapta Shakti Command, praised the various welfare schemes for the families of personnel of Chetak Corps.

GOC-in-C reviews infrastructure, amenities at military station

Tribune News Service,Bathinda, February 9

Lieutenant General Sarath Chand, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Sapta Shakti Command, on his first visit after taking over as the Army Commander, interacted with all ranks, here today, emphasising on “the need for continuous vigil as the security and safety of the frontiers of the nation rested on their shoulders”.The Army Commander was briefed by General Officer Commanding, Chetak Corps, Lieutenant General DR Soni, about the operational and administrative responsibilities of the formation as well as about the welfare activities undertaken for troops and their families.Being his maiden visit, the Army Commander went around the military station and saw the infrastructural development projects and amenities created within the Bathinda Military Station to improve the quality of life of soldiers as well as their families.During the visit, the Army Commander was also apprised of the issues related to armed forces veterans and shown various facilities created for them.Bindu Sarath Chand, regional president, AWWA, Sapta Shakti Command, complimented the families of the Chetak Corps on their wholehearted efforts towards the implementation of the welfare schemes and impressed upon the families to lead a happy and progressive life in an enriching environment.


Indian and Chinese troops hold first joint tactical exercise in Ladakh

Ladakh, Indian army ladakh, chinese army ladakh, Indo-chinese army ladakh, Indian and chinese troops together, joint operation india china, indian army with chinaPhoto for representational purpose.

Focusing on humanitarian aid and disaster relief, the Indian and Chinese troops held the first joint tactical exercise in Eastern Ladakh sector of Jammu and Kashmir on Saturday.

Part of the ongoing initiatives being taken by both the countries, the joint exercise lasted the entire day in Chushul-Moldo area on Saturday, an Udhampur based Defence ministry spokesperson Colonel S D Goswami said.

Led by Colonel Ritesh Chandra Singh, thirty Indian personnel participated in the joint exercise. The Chinese delegation was led by Colonel Qu Yi, the spokesperson said, adding that the exercise was code-named “Sino-India Cooperation 2016’’. The joint exercise was based on a situation of national disaster occurring on the border and subsequent coordination of rescue mission by joint teams of both the countries, he added.

It compliments the Hand-in-Hand series of India-China joint exercises, including the recently conduced one in Sikkim, the spokesperson said, adding the increased interaction among both the Indian and Chinese troops is “very positive step in enhancing confidence and building relations between the two armies’’.

– See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/indian-and-chinese-troops-hold-first-joint-tactical-exercise-in-ladakh/?utm_source=inshorts&utm_medium=inshorts_full_article&utm_campaign=inshorts_full_article#sthash.K2ZhhYDC.dpuf


Decks cleared for Leh airport expansion

Tribune News Service

Jammu, February 5

The Indian Air force (IAF) today agreed to vacate the airbase at Leh, which would be used for expansion of the civilian airport by the J&K Government.This was revealed during a meeting held by Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, Asgar Hassan Samoon with the officials of the IAF, the Airport Authority of India and the civil administration here today.Samoon was informed that the state government had identified alternative land for the existing IAF airbase in Leh, which would pave the way for expansion of the airport for civilian use. The officials further said the land was approved by the IAF authorities.The district officials of Kargil, meanwhile, informed the Divisional Commissioner that in exchange for an alternative site, the Army had agreed to vacate a large tract of land presently under its control, which would be used for the expansion of the town.The IAF officials, who attended the meeting, said the alternative site offered by the state government in Leh had been examined by the experts and they were ready to take over if the state finalised the deal.The Divisional Commissioner was also informed that the modalities were being worked out to shift the existing airbase in Leh to the Airport Authority of India (AAI).Samoon said the paperwork to finalise the dealing should be taken up on priority so that land was transferred to the civil government by the end of February.On January 28, The Tribune had highlighted that the expansion of the strategically-important Leh airport, located 10,683 feet above the sea level, had failed to clear administrative tangle as the IAF had refused to vacate 11.8 acre of land, which had been identified for the project.The expansion project includes construction of the new terminal building to cater to peak-hour passenger rush and creation of new parking bays.The Divisional Commissioner said the administration would transfer the airbase to the Airport Authority of India for development.He said the transfer agreements should be taken up on priority to fully exploit the huge tourism potential of Leh and Kargil, which in turn would generate employment opportunities.Samoon, meanwhile, directed the Airport Authority of India to ensure proper sanitation at the Srinagar airport so that it doesn’t become a breeding ground for dogs and birds, which would pose threat to the safety of air passengers, besides adding to local population.He also directed the AAI to explore the modalities for starting night operations at the Srinagar airport. The IAF officials attending the meeting said they had already given in writing that they had no problem if the airport hosts flights during night.

IAF agrees to vacate airbase

  • The IAF on Friday agreed to vacate the airbase at Leh, which would be used for the expansion of the civilian
  • airport by the J&K Government
  • IAF officials say the alternative site offered by the government in Leh has been examined by experts and they are ready to take it over as and when the state finalises the deal
  • Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, Asgar Hassan Samoon has said the transfer agreements should be taken up on priority to fully exploit the huge tourism potential of Leh and Kargil districts
Indian Air Force to vacate its Leh airbase

The Indian Air Force has agreed to vacate its airbase at the Leh airport, to allow the airport to be expanded for civilian use, for boosting tourism in the region. An official spokesman added that the Air Force will develop its base at an alternate site identified by the Jammu and Kashmir government once the state government finalises the deal.

Arrest Pak spy: AFT to Punjab DGP

KULDEEP SINGH WAS DISMISSED AFTER A COURT MARTIAL FOUND HIM GUILTY OF SPYING AND COMMITTING THEFT OF ARMY PROPERTY

CHANDIGARH: The Chandigarh Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal has come down heavily on Punjab Police and asked the state police chief to get the absconding Pakistan spy Kuldeep Singh arrested.

Kuldeep was dismissed from the army after a court martial found him guilty of spying and committing theft of army property in 2006. While being in army, Kuldeep, a resident of Gurdaspur, crossed over to Pakistan along with his service weapon. He remained absent for four years and eight months from 196 Field Regiment till he was apprehended by troops of 25 Punjab. He was charged with committing theft of the property belonging to the government as while leaving he took one carbine gun; twenty 9 mm ball ammunition and one carbine magazine with him. Between December 1999 and August 2004, Kuldeep had passed on secret information pertaining to the Indian military to Pakistan.

Kuldeep had filed an appeal before the Punjab and Haryana high court, which granted him bail in 2010 till the pendency of his appeal. After the formation of AFT, the case was transferred to it. Kuldeep’s appeal was dismissed in January 2014, and it was ordered that since accused was on bail, he should surrender to military authorities within 15 days from the date of the order.

As he did not surrender, nonbailable warrants were issued but couldn’t be executed by the office of the Panchkula deputy commissioner of police. Thereafter, the non-bailable warrants were issued again in May 2015 and sent to Gurdaspur superintendent of police for its execution. The SP was also instructed that if Kuldeep could not be apprehended due to any reason, the details of his immovable property be obtained from the revenue agency and compliance thereof be reported to the AFT. However, Kuldeep could not be apprehended nor the details of his property were sent.

The AFT again sent a reminder to the Gurdaspur SP but in vain. “All these facts are staring at us where the police (executing agency) should have shown concern…there appears to be a lukewarm response to such a grave situation. The petitioner stood convicted and sentenced for serious offences, he could be a grave hazard to the security of the nation,” said the bench comprising justice Surinder Singh Thakur and Lt Gen Sanjiv Chachra (retd). The DGP was asked to ensure that Kuldeep was arrested soon (by an officer not below the rank of an SP).

Corps of Signal win hockey tournament

AMRITSAR: Jalandhar-based army team Corps of Signal (COS) emerged overall winners at the three-day 39th Baba Pallaha Memorial All India Hockey Tournament, which concluded at Baba Pallaha sports stadium in Butala village, here on Wednesday.

The COS competed against Lyallpur Kha ls a College, Jalandhar and defeated it with a score of 3-0. The winners were also awarded a cash prize of ` 51,000, while the runners up got ` 31,000 by the Baba Pallaha Hockey Tournament Committee (BPHTC) organising committee.

Meanwhile, Rajnish Kumar and Ramandeep Singh from COS and Lyallpur teams were also declared as the ‘best players’ of the tournament. In total, 17 teams from all over North India participated in the event.

Ra ghbir Singh Bal and Randeep Singh Bal, the president and the vice-president, of the tournament committee, respectively said, “This annual tournament has attracted many youngsters towards the national game hockey from not only Butala but also from near and far off villages.”


OROP implementation tables released: Initial cost to exchequer pegged at Rs 10,500 crore, recurring cost estimated 7.5 cr

Although, a section of veterans is still protesting against the provisions of the pension scheme, Centre seems firm on going ahead with the version rolled out in September.

 By Mohammed Uzair Shaikh on February 3, 2016 at 7:38 PM
New Delhi, Feb 3: One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme will be implemented by the Centre beginning next financial year. Government has released the implementation table, revealing the cost which will be incurred by the exchequer. Although, a section of veterans is still protesting against the provisions of the pension scheme, Centre seems firm on going ahead with the version rolled out before them in September.Although, the ex-servicemen had demanded the base date to kept at April 1, 2014, Government has decided to keep it at July 1, 2014. The arrears from July 1 to December 31 will be Rs 10,900 crore. Annual recurring financial implication on account of OROP implementation at pension scale of 2013 would cost a recurring amount of Rs 7,500 crore until the next revision. (ALSO READ: One Rank One Pension: All you need to know about OROP scheme)

The amount of pension will be revised once in five years. Ex-servicemen had strongly objected to the clause, calling it ‘Five rank, one pension’. Instead, they had demanded the revision of pension at every one or two years. However, incorporating the populist demand of the army veterans would further increase the burden on the economy.

The Budget for Ministry of Defence will be increased by a significant 20 per cent. Since the pension of former army personnel is released through MoD, it will require more funds.