Sanjha Morcha

ਪਠਾਨਕੋਟ ਹਮਲੇ ‘ਚ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਹੋਏ ਪਿਤਾ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਨੂੰ ਸ਼ਰਧਾਂਜਲੀ ਦੇਣ ਪਹੁੰਚੀ ਨੰਨ੍ਹੀ ਧੀ

2016_1image_18_09_548425979c-ll 2016_1image_18_10_007570064nsg-camando_1451876350-ll 2016_1image_18_10_095261294niranjan4_1451898972-ll 2016_1image_18_10_170623757niranjan-kumar8_145188100-ll 2016_1image_18_10_276063212colonel-niranjan-kumar-1_0_0-ll

ਬੈਂਗਲੁਰੂ— ਕਰਨਾਟਕ ਦੀ ਰਾਜਧਾਨੀ ਬੈਂਗਲੁਰੂ ‘ਚ ਪਠਾਨਕੋਟ ਹਮਲੇ ‘ਚ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਹੋਏ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਸੁਰੱਖਿਆ ਗਾਰਡ (ਐਨ. ਐਸ. ਜੀ.) ਦੇ ਜਵਾਨ ਕਮਾਂਡੋ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਕੁਮਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਸੋਮਵਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਨੇ ਸ਼ਰਧਾਂਜਲੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ। ਪਿਤਾ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਨੂੰ  ਸ਼ਰਧਾਂਜਲੀ  ਦੇਣ ਲਈ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀ ਨੰਨ੍ਹੀ ਬੇਟੀ ਵਿਸਮਯਾ ਵੀ ਪਹੁੰਚੀ। ਲੈਫਟੀਨੈਂਟ ਕਰਨਲ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ (35) ਐਤਵਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਪਠਾਨਕੋਟ ਵਿਚ ਇਕ ਬੰਬ ਨੂੰ ਨਕਾਰਾ ਕਰਦੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਸਨ।
ਕਮਾਂਡੋ ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਦਾ ਜਨਮ ਬੈਂਗਲੁਰੂ ‘ਚ ਹੀ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀ ਪੜ੍ਹਾਈ ਵੀ ਇੱਥੇ ਹੀ ਹੋਈ ਸੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਵਿਚ ਪਿਤਾ ਸ਼ਿਵਰਾਜਨ, ਪਤਨੀ ਡਾ. ਰਾਧਿਕਾ ਅਤੇ 18 ਮਹੀਨੇ ਦੀ ਬੇਟੀ ਵਿਸਮਯਾ ਅਤੇ ਭਰਾ ਸਕਵੈਡਰਨ ਲੀਡਰ ਸ਼ਰਤਚੰਦਰਾ ਹੈ। ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਦਾ ਮ੍ਰਿਤਕ ਸਰੀਰ ਐਤਵਾਰ ਦੇਰ ਰਾਤ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਘਰ ਪੁੱਜਾ ਅਤੇ ਉਸੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਤੋਂ ਹੀ ਉੱਥੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਤਾਂਤਾ ਲੱਗਣ ਲੱਗਾ।
ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਦੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਤਕ ਸਰੀਰ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਜ ਅੰਤਿਮ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਲਈ ਬੀ. ਈ. ਐਲ. ਮੈਦਾਨ ‘ਚ ਰੱਖਿਆ ਗਿਆ, ਜਿੱਥੇ ਸਵੇਰੇ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਗਿਣਤੀ ਵਿਚ ਲੋਕ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਹੋ ਗਏ। ਨਿਰੰਜਨ ਦੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰਕ ਸੂਤਰਾਂ ਨੇ ਦੱਸਿਆ ਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੁੱਤਰ ਦੇ ਮ੍ਰਿਤਕ ਸਰੀਰ ਨੂੰ ਜਲਹੱਲੀ ਹਵਾਈ ਅੱਡੇ ਤੋਂ ਕੇਰਲ ਸਥਿਤ ਗ੍ਰਹਿ ਨਗਰ ਪਲਕੱਕੜ ਲੈ ਜਾਇਆ ਗਿਆ, ਜਿੱਥੇ ਮੰਗਲਵਾਰ ਦੀ ਸਵੇਰ ਨੂੰ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਅੰਤਿਮ ਸੰਸਕਾਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ।


Pay Commission Award Not To Be Implemented Before OROP

New Delhi: The Seventh Pay Commission award becomes boon for central government employees, is not going to be implemented before the implementation of One Rank One Pension (OROP).

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had earlier said financing the additional amount would not be a problem to implement the Seventh Pay Commission award.

According to a Finance Ministry official concerned, the Empowered Committee of Secretaries (CoS) for processing the report of the Seventh Central Pay Commission, is taking time to let the notification of One Rank One Pension (OROP) be executed first.

He added the notification of One Rank One Pension (OROP) was issued on November 08, while notification of the Seventh Pay Commission yet to be issued and ex-servicemen are pressing hard to implement OROP with some modifications.

Accordingly, the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations will not be implemented until One Rank One Pension (OROP) is implemented.

“The Empowered Committee of Secretaries (CoS) will sit soon to talk about review of the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations,” the official added.

Besides, hike minimum pay From Rs 18,000, rejection of Pay Commission’s recommendation for abolition of some allowances and advances and amendment to service rules is required, the official said. “For this reason also, time is needed.”

Finance Ministry sources said if the government followed the Seventh Pay Commission’s salaries and allowances revision proposals, expenditures would rise Rs 1.02 lakh crore in 2016.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had earlier said financing the additional amount would not be a problem to implement the Seventh Pay Commission award.

The thirteen-member Empowered Committee of Secretaries (CoS), led by Cabinet Secretary P K Sinha, was formed on Wednesday.

The twelve other members of the committee are the Finance Secretary, DoPT Secretary, Pension Secretary, Home Secretary, Defence Secretary, Revenue Secretary, Posts Secretary, Health Secretary, Science & Technology Secretary, Railway Board Chairman, Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General and Secretary (Security), Cabinet Secretariat.

In addition to reviewing the pay hike proposals for central government employees, the Empowered Committee of Secretaries will also looking after the pay hikes for the armed forces.

The Seventh Pay Commission, led by Justice A K Mathur submitted its proposals to the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on November 19 last year, recommending 23.55 per cent pay hike of central government employees, health insurance insurance scheme for staff and pensioners and doubling the gratuity ceiling to Rs 20 lakh.

The highest salary of Rs 2.5 lakh was recommended for the cabinet secretary; currently his basic monthly pay is Rs 90,000.

The government plans to implement the hikes pay from January this year. The Seventh Pay Commission was set up by the UPA government in February 2014.

Currently, there are over 48 Lakh central government employees and 52 lakh pensioners.


Coast guard officers awarded gallantry awards

short by Anupama K / 12:21 pm on 29 Jan 2016,Friday
For destroying a suspicious Pakistani boat off the Gujarat coast in December 2014, Commandant Chandra Shekar Joshi, a Coast Guard officer was awarded the President’s Tatrakshak Medal by Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar on Thursday. Commandant Abhay Ambetkar was awarded the Tatrakshak Medal for locating the boat. This year, 34 officers were awarded gallantry and meritorious service medals.

Govt releases list of 20 smart cities winners, Bhubaneswar tops

venkaiah naidu smartcities

Smart cities winner: Urban Development Minister M Venkaiah Naidu on Thursday unveiled the list of first 20 cities.. (Express Photo)

Bhubaneswar has topped the list of first 20 cities that will be developed as Smart Cities, followed by Pune and Jaipur. Urban Development Minister M Venkaiah Naidu on Thursday unveiled the list of first 20 cities.

He said that the smart cities will demonstrate how integrated planning  and smart technologies can deliver better quality of life.

There were 97 cities in the Smart City Challenge, of which 20 winners were selected.

Naidu congratulated 11 States and the Union Territory of Delhi who have made it to the top 20 smart cities list. He added a total investment of Rs 50,802 cr has been proposed in the selected smart cities and towns during the five year period.

The smart cities were chosen based on a challenge that required cities to come up with integrated plans, proposals, so that there is maximum analysis and planning.

Below are the top 20 smart cities winners

1.Bhubaneswar (Odisha)
2. Pune (Maharashtra)
3. Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. Surat (Gujarat)
5. Kochi (kerala)
6. Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
7. Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)
8.Visakhapatnam (AndhraPreadesh)
9. Solapur (Maharashtra)
10 Davanagere (Karnataka)
11. Indore ( Madhya Pradesh)
12. NDMC (Delhi)
13. Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu)
14. Kakinada (Andhra Pradesh)
15. Belagavi (Karnataka)
16. Udaipur (Rajasthan)
17. Guwahati (Assam)
18. Chennai (Tamil Nadu)
19. Ludhiana (Punjab)
20. Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh)


Defence Forces Can’t Procure Jammers Under Government’s New Guidelines

Defence Forces Can't Procure Jammers Under Government's New Guidelines
NEW DELHI:  In a surprise move, the Defence Forces have been barred from procuring jammers under new guidelines unveiled today by the government which will now allow only states’ police and jail authorities and central security agencies like IB and RAW to buy the equipment.

The decision to keep Defence Forces out of the list of authorised agencies is significant as questions were raised on the now-defunct Army’s Technical Support Division (TSD).

The TSD, which was set up during the tenure of the controversial former Army chief (now Union Minister) General VK Singh, was accused of carrying out unauthorised operations. The jammers or interceptors imported by the TSD for evaluation purpose could not be accounted for after the government decided to close the unit.

“Jammers can be procured only by states’ police department and jail authorities, and central government security agencies like RAW and IB,” the new policy issued by Cabinet Secretariat said.

There was no mention of Defence Forces being allowed to procure in the new guidelines.

It modifies last year guidelines on procurement and use of jammers which had “Defence Forces” among other authorised agencies that can buy jammers.

The new norms also restricts exam conducting bodies like Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) from procuring jammers but allows it to deploy “low powered jammers to prevent cheating during examinations”.

In case of movement of VVIPs guarded by Special Protection Group (SPG), all type of jammers procured by government agencies should be deployed in the vicinity, it said.

The new policy also bars import of jammers without getting a license from Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT).

“Private sector organisation and/or private individuals cannot procure or use jammers in India. These norms take into account the need to guard against random proliferation of jammers as well as to ensure that jammers installed do not unduly interfere with the existing mobile phone networks,” the guidelines said.

Prior permission of Secretary (Security) in Cabinet Secretariat must be obtained before procurement of jammers, it said.

The permission for procurement of jammer is granted in consultation with SPG and IB who maintain a database of available jammers, the policy says.

The statutory examination conducting bodies are allowed to deploy low powered jammers to prevent cheating during examinations. The same would, however, not be through procurement or ownership of the equipment, it said.

They would be given permission only to take it on lease basis and would therefore have to pay only for using jammers on the specific date of examination, as per the guidelines.

The examination body may consider deployment of jammers in sensitive examination centres based on past experience and other inputs rather than deployment in all centres across the country, it says.

Jammer models manufactured by M/s ECIL and M/s BEL, which are evaluated by concerned security agencies, can be procured.

However, central or state PSUs, wanting to manufacture jammers, can apply to the Secretariat giving details of the model, the source of technology and other relevant information, the norms read.

For seeking prior permission for installation of jammers in jails, the total number of jammers required for installation in prisons need to be assessed by jail authorities in consultation with the local office of the Wireless Adviser, Department of Telecommunications, Government of India before the proposal is submitted for seeking approval of Cabinet Secretariat.

“Inviting open tender from unauthorised manufacturers is a violation of the policy of Government of India in matters of procurement of jammers,” the policy reads.


Future of world economy by Vivek Wadhwa of Stanford University.

Governments, businesses, and economists have all been caught off guard by the geopolitical shifts that happened with the crash of oil prices and the slowdown of China’s economy. Most believe that the price of oil will recover and that China will continue its rise. They are mistaken. Instead of worrying about the rise of China, we need to fear its fall; and while oil prices may oscillate over the next four or five years, the fossil-fuel industry is headed the way of the dinosaur. The global balance of power will shift as a result.
LED light bulbs, improved heating and cooling systems, and software systems in automobiles have gradually been increasing fuel efficiency over the past decades. But the big shock to the energy industry came with fracking, a new set of techniques and technologies for extracting more hydrocarbons from the ground. Though there are concerns about environmental damage, these increased the outputs of oil and gas, caused the usurpation of old-line coal-fired power plants, and dramatically reduced America’s dependence on foreign oil.
The next shock will come from clean energy. Solar and wind are now advancing on exponential curves. Every two years, for example, solar installation rates are doubling, and photovoltaic-module costs are falling by about 20 percent. Even without the subsidies that governments are phasing out, present costs of solar installations will, by 2022, halve, reducing returns on investments in homes, nationwide, to less than four years. By 2030, solar power will be able to provide 100 percent of today’s energy needs; by 2035, it will seem almost free — just as cell-phone calls are today.
This seems hard to believe, given that solar production provides less than one percent of the Earth’s energy needs today. But this is how exponential technologies advance. They double in performance every year or two and their prices fall. Given that California already generates more than 5 percent of its electricity from utility-scale solar, it is not hard to fathom what the impact of another few doublings would be: the imminent extinction of the fossil-fuel industry. Exponential technologies are deceptive because they move very slowly at first, but one percent becomes two percent, which becomes four, eight, and sixteen; you get the idea. As futurist Ray Kurzweil says, when an exponential technology is at one percent, you are halfway to 100 percent, and that is where solar and wind energies are now.
Anyone tracking the exponential growth of fracking and the gradual advances that were being made in conservation and fuel efficiency should have been able to predict, years ago, that by 2015, the price of oil would drop dramatically. It wasn’t surprising that relatively small changes in supply and demand caused massive disruptions to global oil prices; that is how markets work.They cause commodities futures and stock prices to fall dramatically when slowdowns occur. This is what is happening to China’s markets also. The growth of China’s largest industry, manufacturing, has stalled, causing ripple effects throughout China’s economy.
For decades, manufacturing was flooding into China from the U.S. and Europe and fueling its growth. And then a combination of rising labor and shipping costs and automation began to change the economics of China manufacturing. Now, robots are about to tip the balance further.
Foxconn had announced in August 2011 that it would replace one million workers with robots. This didn’t occur, because the robots then couldn’t work alongside human workers to do sophisticated circuit board assembly. But a newer generation of robots such as ABB’s Yumi and Rethink Robotics’ Sawyer can do that. They are dextrous enough to thread a needle and cost as much as a car does.
China is aware of the advances in robotics and plans to take the lead in replacing humans with robots. Guangdong province is constructing the world’s first “zero-labor factor,” with 1,000 robots which do the jobs of 2,000 humans. It sees this as a solution to increasing labor costs.
The problem for China is that its robots are no more productive than their counterparts in the West are. They all work 24×7 without complaining or joining labor unions. They cost the same and consume the same amount of energy. Given the long shipping times and high transportation costs it no longer makes sense to send raw materials across the oceans to China to have them assembled into finished goods and shipped to the West. Manufacturing can once again become a local industry.
It will take many years for Western companies to learn the intricacies of robotic manufacturing, build automated factories, train workers, and deal with the logistical challenges of supply chains being in China. But these are surmountable problems. What is now a trickle of manufacturing returning to the West will, within five to seven years, become a flood.
After this, another technology revolution will begin: digital manufacturing.
In conventional manufacturing, parts are produced by humans using power-driven machine tools, such as saws, lathes, milling machines, and drill presses, to physically remove material to obtain the shape desired. In digital manufacturing, parts are produced by melting successive layers of materials based on 3D models — adding materials rather than subtracting them. The “3D printers” that produce these use powered metal, droplets of plastic, and other materials — much like the toner cartridges that go into laser printers. 3D printers can already create physical mechanical devices, medical implants, jewelry, and even clothing. But these are slow, messy, and cumbersome — much like the first generations of inkjet printers were. This will change.
In the early 2020s we will have elegant low-priced printers for our homes that can print toys and household goods. Businesses will use 3D printers to do small-scale production of previously labor-intensive crafts and goods. Late in the next decade, we will be 3D-printing buildings and electronics. These will eventually be as fast as today’s laser printers are. And don’t be surprised if by 2030, the industrial robots go on strike, waving placards saying “stop the 3D printers: they are taking our jobs away.”
The geopolitical implications of these changes are exciting and worrisome. America will reinvent itself just as does every 30-40 years; it is, after all, leading the technology boom. And as we are already witnessing, Russia and China will stir up regional unrest to distract their restive populations; oil producers such as Venezuela will go bankrupt; the Middle East will become a cauldron of instability. Countries that have invested in educating their populations, built strong consumer economies, and have democratic institutions that can deal with social change will benefit — because their people will have had their basic needs met and can figure out how to take advantage of the advances in technology.


Child bravery awardees keen on career in defence, police

Tribune News Service

2016_1$largeimg19_Tuesday_2016_015228693
National Bravery Award winner Dishant Mehndiratta with his parents at a press meet ahead of Republic Day celebrations in New Delhi on Monday. His swift action helped overcome a sticky situation when a robber threatened his mother at their Panchkula home. Photo: Mukesh Aggarwal

New Delhi, January 18The child bravery award winners are keen to serve the nation and want to achieve their aim through a career in defence and police services.Dishant Mehndiratta wants to join the Navy. Fascinated by the sea, he thoroughly enjoyed a recent visit with his family to Mumbai and Goa. His quick thinking and lightening fast action helped overcome a sticky situation when a robber threatened his mother at their Panchkula home. He was already bleeding from the cut on his face, but the urge to save his mother drove young Dishant to fall at the robber’s feet, pull his leg and snatch his knife. He then overpowered the assailant with his mother’s help and raised an alarm. Neighbours came to their aid and the robber was arrested.“The man had put a knife at my mother’s throat and wanted to rob us. All I was thinking was how to snatch his knife and save my mother,” said Dishant as he explained how he pretended to seek mercy at the assailant’s feet in order to grab the weapon from him.Twelve-year-old Dishant was at home with his mother and younger brother when a man came to their Panchkula home on April 4, 2015, and said he wanted to meet his father. It was only when the assailant took out a knife that the three realised that they had let an armed robber into the house.As 10-year-old Joena Chakraborty chased the man who had snatched her father’s mobile phone in Delhi, she was only thinking that something wrong had been done. She started chasing the man across a busy Delhi street after her father shouted that his cellphone was missing.“I knew he would head for a narrow alley, so I reached there before him and caught his legs even though people were shouting that he had a knife,” Joena said during a function organised by the Indian Council for Child Welfare for Bravery Award winners.Joena also has suggestions ready for Prime Minister Modi’s Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. “There should be a Swachh Bharat army of people empowered to collect fines from litterbugs. People who litter must be fined. Repeat offenders should be fined double. Photos of offenders should be publicised to shame them,” said Joena who wants to join the police when she grows up.Sixteen-year-old Arjun Singh will receive the Sanjay Chopra Award this year for saving his mother from a tiger which entered their home in Malgaon village of Tehri Garhwal in Uttarakhand. Arjun’s mother was feeding cattle when the tiger approached their home on July 16, 2014. She screamed and then fell unconscious. Arjun rushed out of his house and picked up a sickle. However, realising that using the sickle would take him too close to the large feline, he quickly picked up a stick and waved it at the tiger. By this time, neighbours came to the house and the tiger fled. Arjun is keen on a career in the Army.


SC fiat to govt on POWs

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday had a word of caution for the government that any deviation from its stand that the issue of Indian prisoners of war (PoWs) languishing in Pakistani prisons can’t be taken to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), will have its own ramifications.

“The Centre’s stand has been that the issue cannot go to the ICJ. Can it change the stand now? It will have its own ramifications,” a bench comprising Chief Justice TS Thakur and R Bhanumathi observed.

The remarks came after the bench wanted to know from government’s counsel R Balasubramanian whether the ICJ has any jurisdiction to go into the issue.

He said the Centre has taken a stand that ICJ has no jurisdiction on the issue. The bench was told that in the past Pakistan had taken some of the issues to the ICJ.

The bench was hearing a batch of petitions raising the issues of POWs, the brutality meted out to Saurav Kalia during Kargil War and the beheading and mutilation of bodies of two Indian soldiers in 2013 by Pakistani army, for a direction to the Union government to move the ICJ.

It was also hearing an appeal filed by the Centre challenging the Gujarat high court order directing the Union government to move the ICJ on Pakistan illegally detaining 54 Indian armymen in breach of an agreement between the two countries after the 1971 war to exchange all POWs.


Former Punjab Governor JFR Jacob dead

Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service

2016_1$largeimg13_Wednesday_2016_121846695
Lt Gen J.F.R. Jacob waves goodbye at Punjab Raj Bhavan as he leaves the office of Punjab Governor and UT Administrator in Chandigarh in May 2003. Tribune photo by Manoj Mahajan

New Delhi, January 13Lt Gen JFR Jacob (retd) died in the National Capital on Wednesday. He was 93. Jacob was the Chief of Staff of the Eastern Army Command during the 1971 war with Pakistan.Lt Gen JS Aurora was heading the command at Kolkata when the Indian Army and Air Force liberated Bangladesh, which was then known as East Pakistan.Jacob was the Governor of Punjab and administrator of Chandigarh between November 1999 and November 2003. Jacob, a bachelor, was living in Delhi’s RK Puram.  He died after a brief illness at the Army’s Research and Referral Hospital.

Lt Gen JFR Jacob & I interacted often. Had a memorable interaction when he presented his autobiography to me. pic.twitter.com/h32apAvBrm

— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) January 13, 2016

He authored the book ‘Surrender at Dacca’ in which he explianed the surrender of 90,000 Pakistani troops.Jacob as the Administrator of Chandigarh brought in people-oriented changes. He was famous for dropping in unannounced at public offices to check their functioning.

Very sad news: General(Retd)JFRJacob, Indian War Hero,Proud Jew,Friend of Israel,has passed https://t.co/gBZWze6SxS pic.twitter.com/kz994hIFoX

— Daniel Carmon (@danielocarmon) January 13, 2016

Israel Ambassador in India Daniel Carmon also paid homage to General Jacob as a proud “Indian and a proud Jew”.
He said he was a living bridge between the people of India and Israel, adding that he was sorry for the loss.


Reservations are not enough

A quota for women in the paramilitary forces must be followed up with real feminisation of security doctrines, writes ANURADHA M CHENOY

Anuradha M Chenoy is professor, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi The views expressed are personal

There has been a long-standing demand that women be part of security, peacemaking, peacekeeping, get protection during armed conflicts and be politically empowered. The Union home minister has said that there will be 33% reservation for women in constable-level posts in the Central Reserve Police Force and Central Industrial Security Force, which are paramilitary forces. Will this empower women or securitise and militarise society? Further, what about other reservations for women, like in Parliament?

SAMEER SEHGAL/HTThe belief that women are essentially peaceful and should remain this way is a binary stereotyping rejected by all genuine social research, which shows that men and women can be trained to be militarist and aggressiveThe argument for affirmative action for women in security is, first, women should have more roles in security and peacekeeping. Second, women should have equal opportunities in all public institutions. Third, since more women are engaged in all types of armed conflicts, insurgencies and even terror attacks, state security needs more women security personnel. Fourth, the nature of military methodology has dramatically changed from pure physical combat to more push button and smart technologies. Fifth, the UN Security Council has passed many resolutions like 1325 and others that ask countries to involve women in peacekeeping and protect women in conflict situations.

There are several aspects to the debate of women’s role in war, security and peace. The traditional point of view is that security is a male affair. And indeed, wars have been dominated by men who planned, fought, became heroes and martyrs and then wrote war histories and made war films. War, security and even strategic thinking are largely masculinist discourse that intersects comfortably with patriarchal and militarised frameworks.

It was generally believed that women have been absent from wars. But this has never been the case. Women played secondary roles in wars, as wives and mothers of soldiers, as care givers, maintaining logistics involved. Women’s bodies have always been seen and equated as territory during war, where women are symbols of honour who can be either violated or safeguarded.

The belief that women are essentially peaceful and should remain this way is a binary stereotyping rejected by all genuine social research, which shows that men and women can be trained to be militarist and aggressive, with the caveat that since women do have motherhood functions and roles, they are just less inclined to use force. Further, women are more inclined to oppose wars because through history they have been at the receiving end of violence during war, post-war reconstruction and during peace. In addition, they are left out of peacemaking, power-sharing and state political activities that remain the domain of men.

Many argue that it is best to keep women out of security forces because this will militarise women and increase the use of force in civil relations, making society even more violent. Why should women be excluded from the huge security complex? Women, like men, have the right to make the choice of joining security forces. Moreover, if security forces follow international laws, especially the Geneva Conventions and its additional protocols, they would be better places to work in.

In Israel, every adult has to do military service. However, women are not sent into major battles, but do participate in security activities. There is currently a debate in Israel if women should be involved in major combat roles and hostilities. The situation in the United States and the European Union is similar. The experience of US women security posted in Afghanistan is known to have been very controversial, where many women were raped and sexually harassed by their own colleagues.

So what does 33% reservation for women in select security services, and that to at the lowest level, mean? One small step forward, which needs to be assiduously followed up by meaningful changes for women’s effective participation in State institutions. This can come if there is affirmative action for women at all levels and all institutions, beginning with Parliament. Women constables will clearly not be in any position to take decisions — their importance lies in their presence and training.

The intention of bringing in women should be to make a more gender-sympathetic and pro-people security force. The key would be to train the security forces, both men and women, to be gender-sensitive, work in accordance with the Constitution and be trained in human rights. Further service conditions for women need to be improved. This means adequate facilities, including for child care and medicare.

Ultimately, women cannot be deployed merely as constables. A move such as this will have real meaning if women have avenues to be promoted, join the security at different levels and, most important, are also decisionmakers and participants in peace processes. Currently there are several peace talks between the Indian State and insurgent groups. One that was recently concluded was the talks with the NSCN (IM). None of these talks have any presence of women. For serious security sector reforms, there is a need to have women, civil society and people’s representatives participating in these talks.

There is a need for India to adopt the UNSC resolution 1325 and other following resolutions in a much more serious way. It is clear that while women are needed for security, they are much more needed for peace. To make peace sustainable and think of security as one that combines national with human security is the only way that security itself can be truly achieved. Getting 33% reservation for women in one section of the paramilitary will only have meaning if it is urgently followed up with real feminisation of security doctrines.