Sanjha Morcha

India wary as uncertainty mars Trump’s Pak policy by Lt Gen Ata Husnain

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Recent developments have in a way exposed the limitations of India’s campaign to isolate Pakistan internationally
  • Trump’s comments underscore Pakistan’s strategic significance for the US in stabilizing the region.
  • The US flip-flop though, according to officials, is unlikely to see India reverse its policy of no talks with Pakistan.

Trump's comments again underscore Pakistan's strategic significance for the US in stabilizing the region.Trump’s comments again underscore Pakistan’s strategic significance for the US in stabilizing the region.

NEW DELHI: US President Donald Trump‘s tweet that he is starting to develop a much better relationship with Pakistan and its leaders, even thanking Islamabad for cooperation on many fronts, has flummoxed many here, coming as it does shortly after the US seemed to have put Pakistan on notice while announcing its new Afghanistan policy.

The Trump tweet is being seen as an acknowledgement by the US of Pakistan’s help in securing the release of a US-Canadian family from the Haqqani network.

While it may not be a policy statement, Trump’s comments again underscore Pakistan’s strategic significance for the US in stabilizing the region.

It’s difficult for India to dismiss it is a stray, throwaway remark as it follows similar comments by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson recently after his meeting with Khawaja Asif, the Pakistan foreign minister. Describing the US-Pakistan ties as extraordinarily important regionally, Tillerson had said that Pakistan was critical to the long-term stability of the region.

In making that remark, Tillerson seemed to echo Russian President Vladimir Putin’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, who had described Pakistan as a key regional player while warning the US against putting Islamabad under pressure. Kabulov made that remark shortly after Trump accused Pakistan of “housing the very terrorists that we are fighting.”

These developments have in a way also exposed the limitations of India’s campaign to isolate Pakistan internationally which saw the government recently describing the hostile neighbour as ‘terroristan’ at the UNGA last month.

The US flip-flop though, according to officials here, is unlikely to see India reverse its policy of no talks with Pakistan until the latter takes some tangible action on terrorism. They recalled how India managed to name-check Pakistan based, India-specific terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed in the Brics Declaration this year with help from Moscow. China had last year blocked the same attempt by India.

According to Ata Hasnain, Lieutenant General (Retd) with Indian Army and strategic affairs expert, the uniformity of India’s policy of no talks – unless there’s a positive refrain on support to terror by Pakistan – should continue.

“Firstly, Trump’s tweets are not policy statements; they are off the cuff, personal and unconsidered views. Secondly, policies do not change or get formulated on the basis of single acts such as the release of long held American hostages by the Haqqani network,” he says, adding that India needs to work towards encouraging US to force Pakistan to act against transnational terrorism.

Hasnain, however, acknowledges Pakistan’s strategic significance for the US saying that Islamabad was actually never put on notice by the US as a matter of policy even though Defense Secretary Jim Mattis did allude to the need to make more effort towards getting Pakistan to cooperate
Pakistan’s geo-strategic location, says Hasnain, lends it to attract the attention of all major powers particularly due to access to the Heart of Asia, reverse access to the Indian Ocean, the commonality of border with Afghanistan and the existence of the core centre of radical Islam.

“While China may be an all-weather supporter of Pakistan, both Russia and the US look towards purely interest based relationships. Both are aware of the nuisance potential of Pakistan and in many ways both are also supporting it to balance Chinese influence,” says Hasnain, adding that terror is of equal concern to US and Russia which is why they are pursuing a policy of accommodation with Pakistan.

“There is nothing permanent in this policy which is flexible and can reverse on the basis of other competing interests,” he adds.