Sanjha Morcha

Was denied permission to challenge Hindujas’ discharge in Bofors case: CBI to SC

download (1)

NEW DELHI: The CBI admitted before the Supreme Court on Thursday that it was refused permission by the authorities a decade ago to appeal against the Delhi high court order discharging the Hinduja brothers in the Bofors payoff case.

When the matter got listed after five years for fresh hearing before a bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice D Y Chandrachud, even the private petitioner advocate Ajay Kumar Agrawal- who was given special permission by the SC to appeal against the HC order- was absent.

Appearing for CBI, advocate P K Dey said the agency was not permitted to appeal against the May 31, 2005, HC judgment discharging the Hinduja brothers- Srichand, Gopichand and Prakashchand- from the case, along with Bofors company.The bench, which was handling the case for the first time as it was last taken up for hearing on August 12, 2010, wanted to know if the notice issued to the Hindujas on October 18, 2005 had been served. Even CBI did not know if it had been served.
The bench asked, “Where is the petitioner?” But the petitioner was absent and had deputed no one to represent him. The bench asked, “Does the petitioner practice in the Supreme Court?” Dey said that he did. The bench adjourned the proceedings to January.

On October 18, the court had allowed Agrawal to file an appeal against the HC judgment in the absence of such a plea by the CBI. The HC had quashed all charges against the Hinduja brothers and castigated CBI for its handling of the case.
“Before parting, I must express my disapproval at the investigation that went on for 14 years… it cost the exchequer nearly Rs 250 crore… a huge bubble was created with the aid of the media which, however, when tested by the court, burst, leaving behind a disastrous trail of suffering… Careers, both political and professional, were ruined besides causing huge economic loss. Many an accused lived and die with stigma. It is hoped that this elite investigating agency will be more responsible in future,” the HC judge had said.