Sanjha Morcha

How India and China resolved three major stand-offs in the Modi era

From Chumar in 2014 to Doklam in 2017, Indian and Chinese troops have faced off numerous times over border disputes since Modi came to power.

File image of a meeting between officers of the Indian Army and China's People's Liberation Army in Nathu La, Sikkim (representational image) | Photo: ANI

File image of a meeting between officers of the Indian Army and China’s People’s Liberation Army in Nathu La, Sikkim (representational image) | Photo: ANI
New Delhi: Tensions between India and China continue to run high along the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh, where the two armies are currently in a stand-off.

However, this is hardly the first time India and China have faced off over their border dispute — there have been numerous stand-offs since 2014, when Narendra Modi led the NDA to power.

The number of Chinese transgressions across the disputed border has risen from 428 in 2015 to 663 in 2019, and a number of these transgressions eventually morphed into stand-offs between the two armies. The most prominent examples were near Chumar and Demchok in eastern Ladakh in 2014, at Burtse in northern Ladakh in 2015, and the 73-day stand-off at the Doklam plateau near the India-China-Bhutan tri-junction in 2017.

Smaller incidents of stare-downs between patrolling troops that morph into fist-fighting are rarely reported, but one in 2017 near Pangong Lake in Ladakh got a lot of media attention after a video showing the two sides hurling stones at each other went public. Another such incident took place on the banks of Pangong Lake in 2019.

All these stand-offs were eventually resolved by either diplomatic negotiations or through army delegation-level talks at the sites of dispute.

ThePrint looks at the three prominent military stand-offs between India and China during the Modi era, and how they were resolved.

Also read: India to seek ‘amicable solution’ with China amid military build-up on LAC


Chumar, 2014

A 16-day stand-off ensued between Indian and Chinese forces in eastern Ladakh near the village of Chumar, after Indian soldiers tried to block Chinese construction work into what India considers its territory. This stand-off began on 16 September, the eve of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s first visit to India, about four months after Modi was elected PM.

The stand-off began after the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) tried to extend the road from Chepzi towards Chumar (which India considers to be its own territory), and the construction work was stopped by Indian soldiers. Meanwhile, in Demchok, which is located in the Chumar area, PLA troops had pushed civilians into Indian territory to prevent ongoing work on an irrigation canal.

Soon enough, 1,500 Indian soldiers stood face-to-face with 750 PLA troops.

Following intense diplomatic and military negotiations, the issue was resolved. Troops from both sides agreed to withdraw after a high-level flag meeting led by major-generals.

The stand-off was resolved after India and China managed to reach a quid pro quo. While the Chinese agreed to not pursue construction of the Chepzi-Chumar road, India agreed to demolish its observation hut at Tible in the same sector, and refrain from building bunkers there.


Also read: Stand-off with China in Ladakh is India’s worst border tension since Kargil in 1999


Burtse, 2015

While much smaller in scale compared to the 2014 Chumar incident, another stand-off took place between Indian and Chinese forces at Burtse in the Depsang plains in northern Ladakh in 2015.

This stand-off ensued after the Indo Tibetan Border Police demolished a temporary hut — allegedly meant for surveillance — built by the PLA in Burtse. This was followed by the PLA calling for force reinforcements in the region, and the Indian side responding with tit-for-tat additional deployments.

The stand-off was resolved within a week by local army delegations at the ground level itself, and did not require any intervention by the governments. Following this, the Indian and Chinese armies decided to conduct a 12-day joint military exercise in China as a major confidence-building measure.


Also read: India and China should lower their border tensions, talk more: Ex-envoy Bambawale


Doklam, 2017

The most prominent stand-off in recent years occurred in 2017 at Doklam, near the tri-junction point between India, China and Bhutan. The 73-day stand-off was the longest instance of the two militaries standing eyeball-to-eyeball in decades.

Doklam is spread over nearly 100 square kilometres, and comprises of a valley and a plateau. The area is surrounded by Bhutan’s Ha valley, Tibet’s (China) Chumbi valley, and the Indian state of Sikkim.

“The problem started in June when Chinese army engineers attempted to build a road through the Doklam plateau, claimed by both China and Bhutan. Following ‘coordination’ with Bhutanese authorities, Indian soldiers based just across the border intervened and literally stopped the Chinese crews in their tracks,” noted an article in War On The Rocks.

What followed was a 73-day stand-off, from 16 June to 28 August, and then weeks of intense diplomatic negotiations. While, initially, the Chinese foreign ministry demanded that India should unilaterally withdraw its troops, eventually both sides agreed and announced their withdrawal on 28 August, returning to their pre-16 June positions.

Analysts believe that China “blinked” as it agreed to stop its road construction in the region. But over the past couple of years, reports have suggested that China has been quietly building infrastructure and ramping up its military presence in the region, which has helped it gain an advantage in Doklam.

“Recent satellite images and intelligence reports show the Chinese have erected several permanent military posts, a few helipads and new trenches not very far from where the two armies faced off,” noted a 2018 report in The Hindu.

About 1,800 Chinese troops are stationed, even in deep winter, in the Doklam area, according to other reports.


Also read: In Ladakh, like in Doklam, China must learn to deal with the assertive Indian soldier on LAC