Sanjha Morcha

COMMENT Vajpayee, Sidhu crossed the line, others need to

Vajpayee, Sidhu crossed the line, others need to

Punjab as a state can do little about how India and Pakistan ties develop or regress. But it stands to directly gain the most if a greater exchange of people and trade is allowed. The benefits of logistics and trade routes are only too obvious. The state, however, almost singly continues to serve the purpose of keeping the flame of a positive bond alive. File photo

Kuljit Bains

Atal Bihari Vajpayee crossed the line in a bus. Navjot Singh Sidhu has done it on foot. As the former departed a world no less divided than he inherited, the latter took a step in the direction shown by his one-time mentor; the direction of peace in the face of obvious hostility. As with the bus initiative, Sidhu’s little excursion across Wagah can be seen as an anti-national act, or an undying faith in the strings that tug at the human heart. Either way, all arguments are semantics.What is, however, not mere wordplay, is the undeniable bond that the two Punjabs across the Radcliffe Line continue to sustain, even as it flies in the face of the narrative generated from New Delhi and Islamabad. Punjabis are simply unable to see it through the prism of history and past hatred; the violence, mayhem, and wars, which they suffered the most. That is because what they feel is present here and now. When a young Punjabi born in the Nineties, post-Independence, post-militancy, even post-Kargil, comes across a Pakistani, what strikes him is the absolutely same features, dialect, idiom, music, folklore. It is just so hard to bury the bond that it’s almost tribal.The past week of Independence Day, Vajpayee’s departure, Imran Khan’s swearing-in, and Sidhu’s walk churned up endless stories and reminders of the conflict between what our hearts yearn for and what realpolitik demands.The most visible sign of the gap was the Retreat ceremonies at Wagah and Sadiqi (Fazilka) border posts. Wagah receives droves of nationalistically motivated tourists, who are treated to a ceremony of aggression, if not hate. Far less known, but much more poignant moments are seen at Sadiqi, where thousands come each year to catch a glimpse of their friends or relatives across the fence, or Zero Line; the frenzied scan of faces to spot their own, followed by a desperate wave, and a shout. Till a few years ago, people were even allowed to shake hands, shed a few tears. Try explaining Indo-Pak ties to them.Exchange of prisoners on Independence Day may be an act of cold diplomacy, yet one cannot but feel the human tragedy we perpetrate in keeping people in jail for decades for no justifiable reason. The Tribune reported the yearning of 96-year-old Amar Kaur (Read story) living in Khanpur, Hoshiarpur, to visit her home in Lahore, and walk the streets of Anarkali Bazaar once before her death. A million such hopes flicker every day.On the other hand was the contemporary political posturing: attacks on Sidhu for hugging the Pak Army chief (despite the Vajpayee-Musharraf handshake); Dal Khalsa in Punjab seeking Pakistan’s help for the “Sikh cause”; social media battles over cricketer Imran and PM Imran. The cynicism, fear, and suspicion could not be better symbolised than the scare caused by mere balloons carried by the wind from Pakistan, bearing messages of “jeeve Pakistan”, that landed in some towns in the Indian Punjab.Punjab as a state can do little about how India and Pakistan ties develop or regress. But it stands to directly gain the most if a greater exchange of people and trade is allowed. The benefits of logistics and trade routes are only too obvious. The state, however, almost singly continues to serve the purpose of keeping the flame of a positive bond alive. That is essential because as and when we are done with hatred – which no doubt has to happen one day – we will need the seed of love to grow back what has been lost. Without that seed, it will be hard to jump across the huge time divide to rekindle the historical bond. Punjab is a repository of that seed.The battle is not about Vajpayee, Imran or Sidhu crossing the line, but about too few people crossing too few lines. If the Pakistani political leadership at one time could think up a “war of thousand cuts” against India, why can’t the people on both sides wage a war of a thousand hugs? Pakistan only sunk while inflicting the thousand cuts, and India suffered in responding to those. No harm trying the alternative.

Back from Pak, Sidhu brushes aside criticism

Faces protest outside Integrated Check Post at Attari

Back from Pak, Sidhu brushes aside criticism

Tourism Minister Navjot Singh Sidhu and Vikram Singh Mehta, a friend of Pakistan PM Imran Khan, at the Attari-Wagah border on Sunday. Tribune photo: Vishal kumar

Tribune News Service

Attari, August 19

Tourism Minister Navjot Singh Sidhu on Sunday returned from Pakistan after attending the swearing-in ceremony of Prime Minister Imran Khan in Islamabad.Though the visit was approved by the Centre, it evoked strong reactions from various quarters.Sidhu even faced a protest outside the Integrated Check Post (ICP) at Attari. Activists of “Pagri Sambhal Jatta”, carrying anti-Sidhu placards, showed black flags to the minister’s cavalcade.He tried to pacify his critics by saying that Imran Khan intended to improve ties between India and Pakistan and “has pledged to take two steps if India takes one”.“Now the need is to take that one step convincingly. The decisions are made at the government level. I was just an invitee in my personal capacity, but I have retunred loaded with love and warmth,” he said.What had offended some back home was his preference of attending Khan’s oath-taking ceremony over the last rites of his “political mentor” and former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. He also drew flak for hugging Pakistan’s Army chief Omar Javed Bajwa and sharing seat next to PoK president Masood Khan.Clarifying his stance, Sidhu said: “When the General walked down to greet me, a brief conversation started on a lighter note. He said to me, ‘Navjot, we want peace’. Then on his own, he cited a proposal to open the corridor leading to Gurdwara Kartarpur Sahib on the occasion of 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev. It is a four-decade-long demand. How could have I reacted to it in a better way other than giving him a hug,” he said.On sharing seat next to the PoK president, he said: “I was sitting with another Indian friend of Khan Sahib when the protocol official asked me to take a seat in the front row. I just abided by it as it was an official function. Many Pakistan dignitaries were sitting there whom I did not recognise. The PoK president was among them. What is the point of giving it a political colour?” he said.The Congress had on Saturday defended Sidhu’s Pakistan visit, calling it a step in the right direction.PPCCchief Sunil Jakhar had said: “Sidhu has shown sportsmanship by accepting the invitation from Imran Khan. The ball is now in the latter’s court, whether he can reciprocate the gesture and show he’s his own person and not a Pakistan Army proxy.”