The Indian Soldier’s contribution during World War I and II was monumental, yet their legacy often sparks a debate. Intolerant critics seek to marginalise Indian blood which was split during these wars simply suggesting that they fought for a colonial government.

Do Indian leaders who go and lay wreaths on monuments honouring the Indian soldiers on foreign soils honour the soldiers or simply fulfil a diplomatic obligation?

They must clarify.

And the critics must freely comment on these visible double standards: There is no colonial power that they need to fear. They, the critics do live in a free country now.

Over 11 Lakh Indian soldiers served in World War I, with more than 60,000 losing their lives (Indian Blood, the critics be reminded). They fought in diverse theatres, from the Western Front to Mesopotamia, and their bravery earned them numerous accolades.

In World War II, the Indian Army became the largest volunteer force in history, with over 25 Lakh soldiers. They fought as Indian Divisions and played pivotal roles in campaigns across Africa, Europe, and Asia, particularly in the Burma Campaign, with over 87,000 fatalities (All born to Indian mothers, the critics be reminded again),

It is painful to think that some individuals and groups seek to exclude our ancestors from history to further their self-serving aims.

I am writing a Monograph on Guts and Glory on Foreign Soil during World War I & II.
If you have a story, anecdote or a photo of your unit and ancestor, please do share.

Warm Regards